Bilinguals NOT smarter, data twisted

http://scienceline.org/2014/07/are-bilinguals-really-smarter/

Don’t believe me, here’s a quote from the researcher herself.

This idea that bilinguals are smarter is relatively new. Up until the 1970s, most educators believed that learning two languages at once would confuse children and slow their cognitive growth.

and the honest research backs this up, many times over
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/04/27/dont-believe-bilingual-propaganda/

But science disagreed with these convictions, says Ellen Bialystok, a professor of psychology at York University in Toronto, Canada. The advent of neuroimaging technology (specifically the CAT scan) in the 1970s granted scientists a new way to investigate how different brains process language. But the emerging evidence wasn’t the only reason bilinguals seemed smarter; Americans’ changing attitudes played a big part, Bialystok says. As the cultural xenophobia of the 1950s subsided, society as a whole began to accept the shift towards multiculturalism.

Scientific.

Bialystok has been researching the bilingual brain for decades, and she is adamant: Bilinguals aren’t smarter than their single-language counterparts. “I think it’s a real problem that [my work] may be interpreted that way,” she says.

Again, for the liars:

Bilinguals aren’t smarter than monolinguals.

Bilingual brains differ in their use of executive function — a system that helps the brain access particular regions or memories when prompted, like a neurological Dewey Decimal System. A person needs executive function to switch between tasks or look for a friend in a crowded restaurant. When less developed, executive function also makes adolescents more reckless.

Contrary to media reports, executive function is not the same as intelligence, Bialystok reiterates.

Conflation, false equivalence, media lies.

They are distinct, discrete, different entities. It’s as stupid as someone claiming that obesity is the same as calories or suicide is the same thing as rope. You can tell the journalists are largely bilingual to make these common comprehension errors in semantic fluency.

But I can’t find a modern, genuine IQ study of many participants that honestly compares monolingual to bilingual. How odd. You’d think they’d want to settle the debate. Unless they’re dishonest?

But pinning down the concept of intelligence itself is not an easy task. Dictionaries define intelligence as the ability for a person to absorb and apply information — and that’s part of what executive function does, too. But this abstract definition of intelligence doesn’t mean much to science,

translation – It isn’t science. It’s propaganda.

We already have IQ, which they refuse to compare honestly because it’s real (Binet) and precise so you can’t really lie.

Bialystok says, and “that’s one of the reasons you can’t say that bilingualism (or increased executive function) gives you more of it.” Intelligence and executive function have a murky relationship and, because of this obscurity, Bialystok may be right to doubt their synonymy.

May be?

Scientist wants to deter liars, she may be right!

Why did I look this all up?

https://frankreport.com/2017/08/23/rainbow-cultural-garden-is-geared-to-the-wealthy-at-125000-per-child-per-year/

His concept is based on his theory that teaching children from earliest infancy in multilingualism develops greater brain development.

Totally not political. Totally not a failed attempt at eugenics.

Mr. Raniere does not speak any foreign languages. He can speak only English.

Mr. Raniere’s program provides each child in the Rainbow Cultural Garden seven different foreign babysitters. Each babysitter speaks in their native language to the child.

Totally not a pedo ring.

The brain actually prunes sounds with age, you’re slowing that process down. It’s bad for them.

1st article

But the surprising part is that the parts of your brain where the lexicon is stored don’t just turn on and off when you need them; they’re engaged all the time.

Linguistic ADHD, yay!

Changing neural pathways to meet new needs is a concept called neuroplasticity, and these constant tiny decisions reinforce the brain’s new configuration to make them more efficiently.

Nope!

This reminds me of the multi-tasking studies where people thought they were better but were actually worse. It’s literally the same brain problem. You have limited capacity.

They have a delayed reaction time, the exact opposite.

He determined that bilinguals had more activity in both hemispheres of the pre-frontal cortex, which controls executive function.

No, not really. Actually, not at all. It does a lot of things, including language processing. That’s way too broad.

e.g.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105381199990441X

Functional Specialization for Semantic and Phonological Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex”

You can’t just claim executive function without fucking testing it (and discounting other processing in the same regions). A picture doesn’t tell you that.

The increased activity, he hypothesized,

guessed

stems from the need to repress one language in order to answer correctly in the other.

slowing
objective retarded reaction

Other researchers, including Bialystok and Costa, have conducted similar experiments over the past ten years, all with comparable results.

What you claim is not what you found.

You have a picture. You use it for studies, it isn’t really a study by itself.

False results can be duplicated with effort. Especially when it involves merely labeling a picture wrong.

Prefrontal cortex is a language centre, for it not to fire up, they’d need to be dead.

Don’t believe me, here’s a nature article, bitches.

Prefrontal cortex doesn’t not equal = smarts. It = listening, consciousness.

https://www.nature.com/articles/nn1299_1131

“Dual streams of auditory afferents target multiple domains in the primate prefrontal cortex”

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ana.410280502

“Large‐scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory”

“This approach provides a blueprint for reexploring the neurological foundations of attention, language, memory, and frontal lobe function.”

I can find this, why can’t you?

1st

Even if the relationship between bilingualism and actual intelligence is unclear

one IQ study, that’s all I ask for

 executive function can help people do a lot of things that may make them seem smarter, such as doing more things at once and cancelling out distractions.

see?

This is like the useless person who pretends to multi-task.

 But, Costa says, “Everything else equal, bilinguals may have a reduced vocabulary in each language.” Bilinguals certainly know more words overall, he notes, but in each individual language, their vocabulary may suffer.

in practical reality

“Everyday practice with the second language makes you control the language; you need to focus on the new language while you [ignore] the other one. This is what seems to help the development of executive function.”

aka school lessons are useless

The long-term cognitive benefits, Costa says, really outweigh the minimal short-term detriments.

No, no proof!

If you mean dementia risk, debunked that in the last post. Considering the brain of bilinguals is permanently changed and slowed on many tasks, there are multiple, permanent deficits.

You could say, a functional disability.

Multicultural Future?

Kaku is ridiculous.

Yes, the future is Star Trek, no delusions there.

No more or less than Star Trek.

Yes, current politics won’t change at ALL. Ignore the inconvenient science of demographics.

Yes, the sub-100 IQ majority of the planet won’t blow itself up or start WW3 with nukes, we’ll become space travelers. You can trust an idiot with a machine gun, times a million.

Yes, obviously all differences borne of evolution will be magically forgotten because the porn network exists.

Everyone will be happy.

Obviously.

Scientism Commies.

We don’t have an economy, fix that and I might believe the other shit is possible.

These people are selling you a rainbow unicorn. You can buy it but you’ll never get it (kinda like a Tesla, ba dum tssh).

When the money runs out, don’t mourn for these people. They deserve to lose their shorts.

When university funding of “scientists”, the new priests, stops, will they be dedicated and research at personal cost, like Newton did? Not in a million years. They are there for the easy money. State funding of science has killed the golden goose. In Newton’s day, there weren’t scandals every five minutes. There was rigour.

Con artists hacking p-values. Theoretical physicists don’t really need to prove their fairytales to have a career (real proof, not looks good on paper). It’s astrology except we’re sure planets actually exist. Tiny strings? Not so much. Sounds like a teapot moon or a dragon in a garage. An invisible dragon.

No multicultural society (or atheist, same thing) has lasted ONE war, ONE famine or ONE economic collapse. He speaks with all the arrogance of a man who never saw the world pre-WW and doesn’t care to pick up a history book either.

Silicon Valley would die if disconnected, as a parasite, from the USA.
If you can’t find clean water or grow your own food, you cannot claim any intellectual superiority. Your own ancestors would be revolted, you’d be considered lower in status than a child.

EU = not what it is, that’s what they claim it is. The EEC was just a trading group.

Planetary communication = we lose our passwords constantly, Sky boxes malfunction and databases get hacked or wiped. Our technology is sub-par, Pollyanna.

These people are realistic as their spherical cows.

We are more religiously obsessed than ever before.

I don’t mean the Muslims, although it is fastest growing in the most populous continent, Asia.

The evangelism of equalism needs to die.

If a Type 0 Civ lets the toilet cleaner boy pilot the space ship, they die.

That’s why you don’t see Types beyond.

Equality is the progress killer. Your ignorance is NOT good as the truth.

Don’t blame science for your atheism

The atheistkult is trying to replace the dogma of a God with the doctrines of scientism and faith in your fellow man like Saints of Truth. Don’t do that. If you change your beliefs, that’s on you, don’t shrink in agency, externalize your locus of control and shift the ‘blame’ onto someone else. You don’t get to blame life (the fates) or society (elders) or the internet (you don’t have to trust what you see online).
Your brain is your business, you are not being influenced by external forces (demons, in ancient terms).
Own your choices, you scoundrels.
A minor point but many men have a magical conversion from faith when their sex hormones start surging, and happen to magically remember like an 80s movie amnesia patient once those settle down in the 30s/40s and beyond. No. That isn’t how it works. There is no Christian of convenience, you were never Christian. A God-fearing person cannot un-know that intuition about the spiritual world. You cannot un-see the colour blue. You cannot un-understand the structure of a peeled orange.
You are in denial, more clouded in judgement than ever. Look up the psychiatry of Freudian denial, it is just the same. A denial of motives, base instincts and a solution to what we now call cognitive dissonance. By consciously lying to yourself. Otherwise, why feel the need to convert people to atheism, if you are so certain of your position? Why does there need to be a term for not thinking something? Where does the obligation to save them come from? Francis Bacon? Shall we make him a Saint on par with George?
Wait, he was Christian, never mind. Christophobia fits far better than other religions, because the fear demonstrated of Christians, not the Church or state power but everyday happy people minding their own, is astounding. The self-styled atheists posture themselves as anti-Christian. They are some of the most pro-Christian people alive. Why do I say this? They believe Christian culture is the norm, Christian principles and rights (WASP, classic liberalism) are greatest thing ever, undeniable and should apply to the whole world, like missionaries. They want to spread the WEIRD culture, the Western attitudes. Raising awareness and education? Set up an atheist church and stop kidding yourself. Hold meetings every Sunday over a copy of God Delusion.

What will they do when Dawkins snuffs it?

Does he get a funerary rite?

There is no study of Christians and atheists in a hospice or dying at home (that I have seen), but I can bet what it would say. Atheists hate their life (observation), blame God (blame game again) and become bitter with each birthday (since this is all there is and deep down, they know they waste their potential). Wouldn’t such a study prove once and for all which mode of life is superior?

The humble pie would choke such prideful people.

We are not fooled by Churchians or CHINOs. There is no such thing as born-again (American horse-shit) and still, when someone does repent, they don’t arrogantly boast or pridefully boss around others,assuming they are forgiven. You can never presume forgiveness (pride, knowing God’s mind) but must act to prove yourself the rest of your life (yes, commitment!). The former sinner does not have moral authority over people who always did the right thing, what could they possibly have to teach that isn’t obvious?

Most men (mankind) are too weak and selfish to handle the requirements of religion (even fasting) and too caring of materialism or fleeting, false popularity to believe in anything deep (any-thing). They simply aren’t good enough for religion, they know they would fail and so oppose anyone who does embrace it (envy, wrath).

To see someone successful at it enrages them (they seek out Christians for this reason, to troll because they know they have no argument), like an SJW witnessing an attractive, feminine woman, her blood boils.
To tear someone down, they must be above you. It must work. They are dishonest about this.

Religion isn’t the false consciousness (post-Reformation Christianity at least), it’s acting like you have a religion but denying to yourself that you need it psychologically.

You do, humans do (read more studies) but you are bad at it.
If you believe in religious freedom so much, leave the Christians alone. Don’t try to make it political. Go after every other religion, too? All hundreds of them? Apply your Crusaderism to the world, equally and logically.

I keep seeing men getting all craven and become weaklings on the topic of cutting off their spiritual life like it was a tumour. What, like a God figure isn’t going to see into your heart and know it’s full of shit?
They try to make out like piety and the pious are damaged. No, it’s a virtue. You keep it quiet but it’s there. In modernity we call it a conscience and people who mock those are the damaged ones.
At the very least, the protectionism, lies and funding scams on the taxpayer should infuriate these (mostly small government) men but that would require consistency. The Reproducability Crisis barely made a drop in the ocean, such is their pursuit of truth.

You don’t get to define the truth, that is a lie.
The truth exists beyond you, it isn’t relative, it won’t be something you’ll like.

The Boomer switch into postmodernism is rooted in one philosophy that many so-called smart people miss: moral relativism. For something to be good, there must be evil. The world is an absolute down to magnetic spins. You cannot deny this duality, polarity and opposition.  You try. Squirm all you like, you know I’m right.

You can’t embrace truth without punishing liars.

OR

hate what is evil, cling to what is good

If you want to be atomic and selfish, don’t inflict it on other people. Cruelty is never a morality. The amoral are united by their cruelty.

Before some troll goes there:

Do I think churches should be taxed? Yes. Fully. If it’s part of society, it should be taxed. Do I think religious schools should be funded on the taxpayer? No, none. Real Christians don’t need a fistful of cash to teach. Schools need huge funding cuts overall and to slice away the Ivy League style donations funds that leeches feed off. These debates are nonsense. There are standards and if Christians cannot meet them, we should all throw a Kool Aid party like war-time Berlin.

We’ll have to when national debt crunches us anyway. (Seriously, a lot of Gen X/Y will kill themselves when the circuses stop, they’re completely maladapted to a real economy).

If they’re going to keep shooting at you, make a smaller target. (Galt, basically).

Listen, if you want to be a conceited prick and lord it over people who deny themselves various things, fine, but you also need to get off your smug high horse to do it. You cannot be both. You cannot think yourself a good person while doing evil (or antisocial) things. If you’re destructive, you don’t get to bask in a halo-like glow of the creative.
You don’t get to pretend you’re deep when your understanding of religion (any) is so facile it was shaken by rhetoric (which is all emotional, you children) and so fragile your lifestyle and mindset can be ‘debunked’ by Youtube videos.
I have seen this claimed and they acted like the internet posters were peerless holders of knowledge. No, that’s a cult. No human knows everything.
Someone who is completely cynical believes in nothing, betrays themselves as incapable of belief and fulfilling that vital side of life (look at the studies into life expectancy and happiness!) and cannot be trusted on a subject they are incompetent at. I do not ask to play netball with a person who has no hand-eye coordination.
These people are not intellectuals and certainly never philosophers.
All they have are buzzwords, memes and smug mockery of people happier than them – narcissists.
Parental issues to one side, they need to look at themselves before judging something they can never see.
Virtue signalling doesn’t work for people who don’t believe in virtue. They grow increasingly desperate and we see that with the mutation of SJW talking points. Dawkins was swallowed by it! Where was the solid security of his principles then? The man is weak, he has the principles of quicksand.
Christianity hasn’t been a ‘threat’ to him in decades. He still spends most of his time grinding away at the Church with a personal grudge, now an angry, bitter old man taking speech shekels. He won’t dare be brave enough to handle the Muslim problems. He won’t admit demographics anymore, such is his love of money…

Typical Boomer logic: I’ll be dead so LOL, that isn’t my problem!

Science is not an opinion, it has never had one unchanging position on anything. Many scientists are religious (there are studies) and it seems the most important the scientist, the more religiosity they have/had. As for ‘stupid’ beliefs, that isn’t how belief (subjective) works. I bet these same guys believe in UFOs instead of angels, Zion or ghosts instead of demons. Demonic AI is like a HIV among atheistkult. Stop.

Powerful thing you can’t see or resist controlling the world? Not Satan, nope!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_demon

Could we be living in an evil simulation?  is an old idea. Can only rely on a Higher Power.

Demons do not mean what you think they do. Patriarchy and other ‘evils’ could be classified as demonic in ancient societies (Bacchus?).

Silicon Valley comes up with nothing new, it’s full of drug-addicted Ivy League morons raised on Daddy’s cash.
https://www.wired.com/story/the-other-tech-bubble/ You have to be rich to move there.

If you don’t believe in any fate, how can there be any luck? Basic questions never occurred to these supposed intellectuals.
To reiterate my original point, do not blame anyone or anything but especially science. You sound retarded. Science is a tool used by humans, you can no more blame it than a hammer on a bench. There is no divine authority to science because it creates nothing, it reports on somethings that humans note that may/not exist in the way they perceive. Science is a witness, it isn’t the cause of an event.

Accept your impotence.
There is no appeal to sacred science on matters of philosophy because science is a philosophy, a narrow one called empiricism. The Scientific Method is all the science there is and ever will be. It dictates nothing and often slaughters your holy cows e.g. Global Warming predictions, fail.

How could the climate deity betray you? You divined all the omens! Must appease!

Science is permanently changing and the fundamentals of the world do not. It is a logical error to apply it, it does not follow.
The method is a tool used by humans, who can be inept or corrupt or bribed or plain wrong. You have the typical polyanna leftist view of humanity, which all the findings have shown to be mistaken. Only philosophy can compete with philosophy (it is not self-correcting any more than a book is self-reading and whole theories are rarely disproven and discarded) but science is really a practice. You might as well be rain-dancing against the ozone.

Shake your stick, atheists, it’ll make no difference.

Muh Butterfly effect, O.K.

Science isn’t a magical force to replace the magical force you feel you lack control over. There is more in common between scientific reasoning (pattern finding) and folk magic (sympathetic magic) than you will ever know.
You can’t be bothered to properly research it and no, Youtube or Google do not fucking count. Specialist websites and e-celebs do not count, they are biased. You must do the work yourself and read some very old books e.g. Kant’s Pure Reason, any Descartes, some Newton. Do not stick to 20th century ramblings by glorified degenerates like Einstein, there’s a reason the major discoveries occurred before this time, the method has become weak as the people using it. If you dare bring up the sell-out engineer Nye like he’s a scientist, I will find you and fucking cut you on the astral plane. He’s like the mascot Barney the Dinosaur for scientism. A kid’s TV show presenter, look at your claimed authorities and begin to see why everyone ignores you. Society is structured a certain way because people are and people don’t change thanks to propaganda – you’ll know on your death bed.
Popper is a philosopher, not a scientist. There is no experiment to prove or disprove God, Pascal’s Wager is the closest we have and a sound, pragmatic view, but still – do not blame science for your personal flaws/sins. Science doesn’t work that way.

What you are trying to do has been named by psychiatry – like learned helplessness (related), it’s absolution of responsibility. It doesn’t exist.

Your body, your brain, your belief, YOU.

There is no method without experimentation and findings. No, talking does not count.
We were warned – Father of Lies, going all the way back to Loki.
Are you going to deny the frequency of human deception too?

There are plenty of studies, don’t be anti-science!

(Questioning findings is not questioning the approach. like hating one claimed work of art doesn’t mean you hate all art). It reminds me of the vain people who are too stupid to understand that they are disliked for good reasons so they call everyone jealous (clubber types) when you can’t be jealous of a vapid person whose entire life is meaningless crap. Nobody is jealous of shit.

Atheists insult things like white identity because you didn’t build that but hey, you didn’t discover anything past your navel so get off Newton’s dick! You aren’t allowed to be proud of that, it’s really sad.

Atheists fear the deadly sins being a societal standard again. Sloth in particular. Show me an atheist who has Protestant work ethic…. they don’t exist.

Gluttony is a great way to spot a loser group. Which religion has the most obese people? What if we include atheism? Surely the ‘logical’ people would be able to carb-count? If you lack the mental rigour to put down the junk food, why should anyone listen to you?

It’s like the findings on the socialists and communists being weaker and more likely to cheat for money in studies. You choose your belief to fit your personality and your desires, what you wanted to justify doing anyway. This isn’t noble, it’s low. SJWs don’t want to put effort into their appearance, so they claim it’s wrong to. Boom, you get what you want and a lush new moral high ground to boot! PUAs don’t want to admit premarital sex (PC term, actually fornication) would be counted as rape in a Patriarchy, the marriage license is the only valid consent, so they claim it means something else and rewrite history (fail to) – boom, everyone is giving them attention they want for being wrong on multiple levels. None of them want to change anything, like roll back the Sexual Revolution that let them work long careers in a rape culture or be club rats without the pressure to marry and become a Patriarch, it’s a rationalization and most people are like that, they don’t actually think. That’s the norm, the average.

Fine, be an animal. Don’t pretend to be anything else.

Crazy people don’t know they are crazy. Moral insanity used to be a common term. They don’t have it, know it, perceive it, recognize it, value it and scoff at practicing it. They are not free, they are evil. There is only a perversion of what is good for the world, psychiatry abides by this idea. Look at the wages of sin, all the cancers being caused by STDs. Almost like a punishment, isn’t it? In scientific terms, cause and effect? What you reap you sow, later and bigger? Asylums were commonly populated with this type of person, we now have studies proving neurological deficits e.g. hypofrontality. They are literally broken human beings and the behaviour is an outcome, the beliefs are excuses. They don’t have beliefs, they don’t have a moral compass beyond instinct.

A surgeon must cut to correct. A farmer must weed to seed. Wood rot must be exposed to be cleaned. It is the same with immorality.

NOTE: Agnosticism is assisted by science. The not-knowing. The moment you claim to know, that is not science, it is an article of faith.

In pure terms, an absence of faith is not more reasonable. Men are suffering new depression rates more akin to the female rate as their belief systems break down. (No, you’re not special boys, female rates are still higher because you refuse to marry. Little girls don’t fantasize about heading an HR department for fifty years). Remember, God is the ultimate man to believe in. You lose faith, you naturally begin to self-hate. Neither is your father the model of all mankind’s potential, he could be a write-off, you are not trapped by his patterns. Unless you choose to be.

Denial is unhealthy, it leads to physical stress that builds up and causes many chronic, fatal conditions on the rise (cancer, heart disease, MS, drug addictions, promiscuity, things demonstrably bad for you and your body and future). The escapism of substances or habits is particular to the male psyche, society used to protect you from it but you insisted you had the right to slowly kill yourself, waving your credit card in the air and begging to be enslaved.

OKAY, said the politicians, moving around their investments to the alcohol companies.

[Clooney owns one, FFS. Ain’t that a sign of collapse? Saint Jolie, also an alkie. She could be growing food for her little brown slave babies in the colours of Benetton (all brown), snatched from their parents and country into her silicon* claws. You know she bribed some people, you know. I guess slavery is okay if they’re brown and babies.]

It’s phrased like a religious conversion (I was in the darkness of religion but then I saw the light of reason). Reason is not the enemy of belief, reason comes after belief to understand it better.

You don’t doubt your existence, your name, your reality (AI excepting), that’s psychotic, to terminally (neurotic) doubt your faith means you never actually had it. I can’t lose a command of numbers because a few equations came out wrong. Still, the fault would be with me, not reality? Some days it looks cloudy, I don’t start saying the Sun might not really exist because I don’t see it today.

Constantly changing your mind is a sign of a feeble one. If you’re too open-minded…

Enlightenment is a religious concept of this gained knowledge. The first atheistkult tried to steal it as something objective. Nah, man. Not gonna happen. You tell me what an atom is without a continuum paradox and we can talk.

Your epistemology sucks Donkey Kong’s balls.
You know NOTHING.

At least we name the unknown and try to appreciate it (humility). You deny it exists so you can strut around like the Universe belongs to you. You’ll still be worm food, dude. You’ll be sorry. Nobody is impressed by brats.

*Her pick-up line used to be “Guess what’s real”.

Socialists in science trying to avoid being scientific

http://quillette.com/2017/07/06/social-sciences-undergoing-purity-spiral/

You picked the wrong fucking field to have feelings.
Especially if those feelings involve censorship of facts you disagree with.
Do you know how many people continue to object to evolution?
Still true. We can see a fetus undergo the stages of evolution in real time.
It’ll never not be true.
We’ve found plenty of Missing Links, and Creationists move the goalposts.
That’s crazy, like suppressing crime and IQ data.

Scientism isn’t real, whatever your false idols tell you. They’re false by nature.

Nurture, as you call it, is mostly measurement error.

You are wrong in MATHS.

Only now, at the end, do they understand.

The multicultural experiment (official media term) was always going to fail because their core premise was that human nature itself could be controlled and experimentally manipulated.

Yeah… people rebel against that.

And it was just colonialism in reverse, instead of going to the poor people to feel superior (missions), they come crawling to you.

“What’s interesting about Haidt’s alternative interpretation of the liberal progress narrative is that he mentions two elements central to the narrative—private property and nations. And what has happened to a large extent is that as the failures of communism have become increasingly apparent many on the left—including social scientists—have shifted their activism away from opposing private property and towards other aspects, for example globalism.”

There’s no such thing as globalism, it’s a void of values. Like there’s no one language, a single language would be the starting point.
Empires unite nations, that’s why the British Empire taught everyone English.
It’s the best language, so you’re still using it.
Globalization has failed because the East has outcompeted the West. A world without white people will not be dumb enough to hand the enemy in various wars your very factories for slightly cheaper Nikes.
In real terms, they bred more, we paid for it and called it ‘aid’ and the future belongs to them barring famine.
Accept your death began with manufacturing. You gave away future prosperity, that’s gonna affect the birth rates.

“But how do we know a similarly disastrous thing is not going to happen with globalism as happened with communism? What if some form of national and ethnic affiliation is a deep-seated part of human nature, and that trying to forcefully suppress it will eventually lead to a disastrous counter-reaction? What if nations don’t create conflict, but alleviate it? What if a decentralised structure is the best way for human society to function?”

…If?

IF.

jesus my sides

genophilia is a dictionary word

ingroup preference is a well-studied phenomena

genetic diaspora exist, ask HBD chick

they’re so close to the pendulum of r/K, aren’t they?

nations formed of genetic tribes to alleviate conflict when weaponry advanced and made mass slaughter possible but, duh, undesirable, ask a forensic anthro or any evo biologist

hell, ask sacred cow Dawkins if supranationalism, the true name for globalism, is even genetically possible
chimps can’t do it, softy peaceable chimpanzee frequently murder one another for literally no reason than territory
it’s been filmed, I’ve seen it

“What if the type of mass-scale immigration

dictionary definition of invasion met but ok

even without weapons, you can ‘rape’ a nation’s women and state coffers (“economic migrants” literally invaders) and that is their intention

search weapons cache European mosque or something like it
happens all over
just the ones we find

currently occurring in Europe,

meanwhile, Christian genocide in MENA too

Look! A distraction!

containing relatively large amounts of people with different nationalities, cultures, and religions, is going against some of the core features of human nature?

Show me one place multiculturalism in history hasn’t involved a genocide at some point.
ONE.
Look up Neanderthals, it’s now in our blood because it’s the reason we’re here and they’re not.

Maybe it isn’t, but if it is, do we have to wait until after the fact to say ‘well, globalism doesn’t work’, as we did with communism? Surely there is a better way.”

Picking up a fucking history book?

The burden of proof was on the pushers. They never did. Not even in their neighbourhoods or schools. The People never consented. When asked (see Brexit), they reject it.

Like the Unis in general, the social sciences only have a shit reputation now liberals are running it.

Coincidence, this is not.

The End of Science

West Hunter

John Horgan believes that research on race and IQ should be banned, and that having university IRBs veto such research would be a reasonable way of doing so. There are problems with this idea. Not just that freedom of enquiry is a thing of value, and that John, if given the chance, would exchange his soul for a pile of dung – and be right to do so. No, enforcement of this policy entails technical difficulties. For one thing, essentially all IRBs already try to ban such research, but they don’t do a very good job, because they don’t know enough about the subject. Probably nobody does. For example, not so long ago people felt free to speculate that modern humans might have picked a few useful alleles from Neanderthals – including ones that increased intelligence. That was before it was found that there is substantial Neanderthal admixture only in…

View original post 288 more words

What does Marx have to do with China?

Thought experiment: What would Marx say?

Vague shitpost of the obvious incoming.


In an all-white society, he was right to fixate on class because race wasn’t a factor.
Still, race has become too burdensome as a factor, people forget class. The Left aren’t wrong to bring it up, merely to blame it for everything. Class isn’t even blank slate, that’s just the way economists lie about it to deny historic responsibility from their field. Bubbles aren’t natural, unless you mean the soap kind. They are man-made – by crooks.
Marx was right that the middle class have to die. What he missed is that middle-class ideas have to die. That would swiftly solve the problem of the chattering class.
There’s no middle-class without a separate identity to carve, an axe to grind, an other to oppress or uplift, in an appeasement display to prevent their own demise or consolidate their position against same-race competition.
The superpower is in the production. During the British Empire, the factories were here, since the Industrial Revolution. Then America, and they had two profitable wars for the right people. Now, China runs the world. The Chinese aren’t being told to learn English, the West is being told to learn Mandarin. The Chinese have enslaved their own people to spread by immigration, to reach by financial influence and to conquer the West in the long-run. Outbreeding us also outweighs in terms of war. They can afford to lose a billion, we can’t lose a fifth of that without going extinct. The West ought to await Malthus with glee.
Mother Russia will always come up smelling of roses, you never mess with Mother Russia. The Chinese under-estimate the Russian, they don’t understand the psychology. It’s passive, it isn’t aggressive, and it settles very well.
Where are the factories? Where are the workers? Where are the means of production? You might say, They never won a war! But they won. They won something and something real. Further, the US never beat the British, not in real terms. Always one step forward, three back.
The USA has never won a war. Look how independence is going. Do you really think the mass immigration from Africa would’ve happened back then under British rule? Neither of those world wars were necessary.
China won the spoils of all that bloodshed with patience and cheap toys. I think it might be Christmas that killed the Christian. Perhaps the Puritans were right.
However, the consent of the Western worker is a fickle thing. The parasite load of the global economy is reaching tipping point thanks to demographic shifts. Really, it’s a tidal wave and you need to keep a weather eye on the horizon to know when to move. The gene pool is full of mud and antibiotic resistant disease.
Nations have been sold out for less short-term gain.
The financial systems rely on worker consent. Marx correctly pointed out that when they realize the game is up, there are no more gibs and no retirement…. what else is left but rebellion? Slaves rebel.
Statist reward incentives are parasitic on the very people who produce them. I won’t sit here grinding on an old wheel. Gen Y and Z will be fascinating to watch as this plays out. Brainwashed from nursery.
I wanted to point out these basic, salient arrangements.
It’s everybody’s problem.
This isn’t a white issue, but whites do appear to be the golden goose – at least in terms of charity ‘aid’.
I’ve said before, you can’t have white levels of prosperity with fewer white people in society.
Resources are contracting because population is expanding past the elastic.
It’s going to snap.
The sustainable nutjobs lose traction because they never discuss the eugenic need for population control. They do on any other species. By comparison, the UN pretends this will happen magically. Humans are a locust swarm on this planet, but not all humans. #NotAllHumans
The common sense necessity to acknowledge this is missing thanks to vice and corruption, the outcome. The academics expect gold-plated pensions. The politicians want to be voted back in. The economists want grants. The capitalists want fatter margins. The same finite resources divided between a sustainable, reduced population (commonly est. 1 billion, possibly up to 2) will result in instant prosperity. Marx believed that reducing the working-class was impossible, since the rich would suffer but- what if the poor don’t work? Marx is ridiculous for many reasons, but not so much as his followers who believe nothing has changed in almost a century and a half. When practically everything has changed and they also brag about this ‘progress’… cognitive dissonance is a brain cancer, kids.
For the poor to be better off, most of the population has to go. The majority isn’t Rich.
Squeezing the rich would only work a few years… they’d stop producing.
Demographics. Economics is an application, either correct or incorrect. Beyond demographics, there isn’t much to say. Economists are not social scientists*. They don’t care about people. They will screw people to get numbers. Economists would be run out of any medieval town, a saner time. They usually sell Get Rich(er) Quick – this is afforded by a broken currency system and fractional reserve leprechaun money.


There isn’t One solution. There are many. Like a jigsaw. Many problems.
Maybe something like 75% have a similar cause, but they don’t all have the same solution.
People don’t want to look because not only does it 1. suck to live through something you don’t deserve, but 2. the Problem is huge and 3. there are too many details to discuss solutions at this stage of decline. Where’s the will?

*Could we also stop asking engineers and physicists about social science problems? Their opinions are crap. Ask a 5yo.

Also, social scientists are not preachers. Their word isn’t gospel. Neither is a preachers, come to think.

What does Bill Nye, a children’s show presenter, know about how to bring down national debt?
What does Token Black Tyson know about humanities education?
What does ..actually, there aren’t any celebrity female scientists, are there?

We need SOLUTIONS.

A ‘final solution’ won’t fix the social system or the hegemonic cultural paradigm. Yes, you’re very edgy, please move and let the grown-ups talk.

Look at the food security of Asia if you want a blackpill LOL, especially the much-vaunted SE and China (our economic superior). It hasn’t occurred to a lot of  these ‘redpills’ that Asia has only been historically strong because the West is all-time weak. Superpowers are on a see-saw kind of setup.

I think Africa will invade Asia, personally, based on land bridges and farmland.

Aid workers are not saints, they are the devil in a halo.
History will view them as scum, vermin, who encouraged Mass rape, disease and famine.
All for the glory of their pride.

They knew this was coming. They simply don’t care. Look up the disaster of Millennium villages. They wanted their bribe money, free 4x4s, 5* hotels and plenty of brown children to rape.

Google ‘UN rape scandal’ sometime.