Implying that acting with free will is a bad thing.
[inc. freedom of association].
Pro-pathological altruism and demographic suicide.
If something happens throughout society, you needn’t indoctrinate kids in its existence in school.
An exclusive category with no exclusions is an illusion, it doesn’t exist.
If you can’t say what it isn’t, it’s unfalsifiable.
I wonder if this might be oppressive to a race, therefore invalid because if the concept of racism itself is racist, there’s also no such thing.
From an academic paper covered previously. That quoted is the indisputable fact, unless you deny Darwin.
Lefties are the real Creationists.
If Darwin were taught in schools, nobody would fall for equalism.
Oh, the crime of being an unwanted fetus.
Make an update for the next election, someone.
e.g. Humans are greedy bastards never to be trusted versus Social engineering is good and public sector workers deserve better pensions than the taxpayer.
Violence is wrong, it’s against democracy versus Won’t do as we say? Prison! No? We’ll shoot you!
You must be tolerant versus “Social Justice” is noble to destroy you.
Genocide is wrong versus You don’t deserve to live in peace.
We celebrate diversity versus White people don’t belong here.
If you hurt them, that’s evil versus if they hurt you, it’s okay when they do it.
That’s right, smear on a lipstick full of shimmery bullshit. Including lead (and wonder why girls are depressed). [Literally eating lead.]
The Victorians ate arsenic but this is worse. Arsenic temporarily improved the complexion.
Using the term ‘mica’ for what’s essentially powdered foil suggests women wouldn’t want it if they knew what it was.
It isn’t like there’s a connection between dissected and tested Alzheimer’s plaques and aluminium deposits, is there?
Why are the Boomers raised on cans of this stuff seeing an explosion in Alzheimer’s rates?
As always, at first, go to the ‘officials’. Find out the Party Line.
“Although aluminium has been seen in amyloid plaques”
“there is no solid evidence that aluminium is increased in the brains of people with Alzheimer’s disease.”
Whew, what cognitive dissonance.
It’s literally forming those plaques that ARE the disease but nbd?
Solid evidence – like a solid chemical analysis of solid plaques in the solid brains of solid dead people with Alzheimer’s?
Look at the hustle to move those goalposts.
“Because some people with the disease had aluminum deposits in their brains, it was thought that there was a direct connection…”
There’s no negative evidence possible for that to stop being proof.
It’s literally in their brains.
“However, after many years of study, no conclusive evidence links aluminum to neurodegenerative disease”
I detest scientism. Look at these papers and tell me what’s ‘conclusive’.
(Apart from donations of mega-corps to Super PACs to prevent this mega-lawsuit).
“A multi-institutional team of researchers has defined for the first time how metal ions bind to amyloid fibrils in the brain in a way that appears toxic to neurons. Amyloid fibrils are linked to the development of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Creutzfeldt-Jakob. Although metal ions, most notably copper, can bind to amyloid in several specific ways, the researchers found that only one way appears toxic.”
But how, ‘critics’ argue, could this possibly occur? What’s the mechanism? Nobody has proven a mechanism….?
“Link between Aluminum and the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease: The Integration of the Aluminum and Amyloid Cascade Hypotheses”
“In particular, the link between aluminum and Alzheimer’s disease has been the subject of scientific debate for several decades. However, the complex characteristics of aluminum bioavailability make it difficult to evaluate its toxicity and therefore, the relationship remains to be established.”
Uhuh. Isn’t that your job?
If it’s impossible, why are you getting paid?
“On the contrary, aluminum is a widely recognized neurotoxin that inhibits more than 200 biologically important functions and causes various adverse effects in plants, animals, and humans.”
“Mounting evidence has suggested that significance of oligomerization of β-amyloid protein and neurotoxicity in the molecular mechanism of AD pathogenesis. Aluminum may play crucial roles as a cross-linker in β-amyloid oligomerization.
Here, we review the detailed characteristics of aluminum neurotoxicity based on our own studies and the recent literatures. Our aim is to revisit the link between aluminum and AD and to integrate aluminum and amyloid cascade hypotheses in the context of β-amyloid oligomerization and the interactions with other metals.”
But HOW could this POSSIBLY operate? – intellectually dishonest douches.
Note the prestige of journal. International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, those hacks.
But on a MOLECULAR level…. – douchecanoes.
“Quantification of the Aβ peptide in Alzheimer’s plaques by laser dissection microscopy combined with mass spectrometry”
It’s behind a paywall but it’s there. Check the academic pirate bay.
It’s been known for a while.
2000: “Aluminum has been identified as a neurotoxin for over 100 years.”
So stop using it in food, cosmetics, deodorant, cookware and cans?
Their use actually came in well after it was a known neurotoxin. Because that isn’t dodgy.
Reference for that sentence:
Doelken P:Naunynschmiedeberger. Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol 40: 58-120 cited by Crapper McLachlan DR., Lukiw WJ, Kruck TPA, Aluminum, altered transcription, and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Environ Geochem Health, 1990; 12(1-2): 103-114.
Link for that: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01734059
“The etiology of some, if not all, cases of Alzheimer’s disease is linked to a mutation in the proximal portion of the long arm of chromosome 21∶21q11.2 → 21q22.2. While the functional consequences of the mutation are unknown, we speculate that one consequence of the mutation is loss of the natural barriers and intracellular ligands for aluminum. As a result, aluminum gains access to several brain sites including the nuclear compartment in certain neurons of the central nervous system.”
I know both my shit and my bullshit.
1990. Who owns the aluminium? That’d be a fun tour of genocide.
1992 laser study, note prestige of journal.
“Selective accumulation of aluminum and iron in the neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer’s disease: A laser microprobe (LAMMA) study”
“In addition, probe sites directed to neurons identified in snapfrozen cryostat sections from 2 subjects with Alzheimer’s disease revealed similar spectra with prominent aluminum‐related peaks, confirming that our findings are not related to exogenous contamination through fixation, embedding, or other procedures prior to analysis. This study further confirms the association of aluminum and neurofibrillary tangle formation in Alzheimer’s disease.”
But I guess I’m just scared of non-stick pans, where’s the evidence?
I didn’t embellish before but it’s a clear-cut case of plagiarism.
Archive a few of these.
“Professor Bartocci traced a link between De Pretto and Einstein, through Einstein’s best friend, Michele Besso.”
He hated being famous because he feared being outed in his own time.
The guy practiced incest and people still praise him.
Incest has never been a controversial thing to oppose.
The Jewish IQ posterboy is a plagiarizing pedophile.
“like a beggar clothed in purple, whom ignorant people take for a king.”
spot on! strong words from a mild-mannered foreigner
The crazy hair matched his sexuality, even to divorce in that time was a no-no. His first wife got the Nobel money because her work as a mathematician nabbed him the prize. Letters proved it, he had to run everything past her. It’s no coincidence the Nobel is a public fiction of rich Jews giving other Jews prizes for their mutually-agreed superior intellect, think of the optics.
Why are no other intellectual prizes recognized or allowed?
Curiously, his socialism is praised despite famously running away from …a socialist regime.
Like a typical sociopath, he was a creep, a hypocrite, a liar and a thief. That’s simply the proven fact.
He denied the science required to operate on his triple A and the hubris killed him.
I can already feel the heat of hate I’m going to get for this.
There’s a broken record.
You’re being played.
Not all (crime) are (demographic) is an excuse to dismiss data.
Probability data. It happens to the HBD crowd all the time.
A derailing tactic intended to keep you ignorant and fixated on casting aspersions (ad hom). Bullshit rhetoric. There’s no debate. It’s the statistical equivalent of anecdote and rejects the heinousness of the crime in question. In a civilized, First World society, the acceptable number is zero.
They want you to forget this.
(I also think that traumatizing a person with crime should be an aggravating offence, we already implicitly have this but it’s been forgotten in sentencing for political expedience e.g. aggravating factor for taking a child’s innocence away or raping a celibate/faithful Christian or a virgin, same principle. It could even apply to male rape of a straight man, since there is another layer to the trauma based on the individual’s beliefs and identity. “Hate” crime should be put toward those ends if anything, protecting the in-group against the out-group of the really spiteful (anti-Western) predatory targeting and life ruining. The system we have is broken because it defends the out-group like infantile damsels when they are literally criminals explicitly targeting the in-group of the society they chose to live in. That is “sexual terrorism”.)
I’ll take the one with more data as example.
Muh “not all men are rapists”
– but most rapists are male, it’s just un-PC to collect demographic data (including race) and publish it.
Seriously, try to find rape data by sex and/or sexuality, I did. Couldn’t find anything reliable. Isn’t this suspicious?
We need a data collection charter where such information in the public interest must be collected and published freely, with no distortions. Including the rate of demonstrably false accusations. It viscerally sickens me that a raped man by another man must expressly state he isn’t homosexual to be taken more seriously. Where are the libertarians on that privacy? Consent is never an assumption, property rights begin with the body.
You’re being hoodwinked. So I looked up American data since a lot of you are filthy Americans.
You won’t pay attention unless I’m talking about you.
Best I could find in a moderately long search attempt.
OT but “Attempted rape includes verbal threats of rape.”
How many men plead ignorance on that one?
All this insufficient data (even at collection stage) is intended to keep men and women at one another’s throats. To lower the fertility rate. It is dyscivic.
Sex-based triangulation. You cannot fight the system that oppresses you if you’re busy engaging in an impossible game of one-upmanship.
They also want to deny unPC but true stereotypes by hoping you won’t ask for full datasets.
Your taxes are paying for them already, you should get all the information.
They also are intellectually dishonest to report victim but not criminal.
Revised Oct 2018 data from 2016 (latest).
“The rate of violent victimization against males increased from 2015 to 2016, rising from 15.9 to 19.6 per 1,000 males age 12 or older.
From 2015 to 2016, the rate of aggravated assault against males age 12 or older rose from 2.7 to 4.2 per 1,000.
The rate of violent victimization against persons ages 25 to 34 rose from 21.8 per 1,000 persons to 28.4 per 1,000 from 2015 to 2016, and the rate for females in this age group rose from 24.6 to 33.4 per 1,000.”
>implies women are not persons but O.K.
Who attacked them? A ghost? It is a common incomplete sentence and poor grammar. It’s also scientism.
You need a Punnett square and I see none.
Male, female and male, female. Basic stats again? Otherwise an individual reading cannot know their risk.
“Not all men” really is the fake right equivalent of the fake left’s “not all immigrants”.
-but most terrorists are foreign, culturally and racially, it’s just un-PC to collect demographic data….. again.
See the pattern?
You’re chasing your tails.
Red-pill statistics can make men look really, really bad. Men have a right to know the likes of rape data, in particular, because they need to know they’re at great risk from other men as well.
Naturally it doesn’t list the latter but they take one step forward in two steps back by collecting male victim data…. only to neglect entirely listing the female. Mathematics in need of context. Society is not just one group, you collect all the data or it’s close to useless. They know this, it’s deliberate. This is intended to bait silly MRAs who won’t even notice it doesn’t mention perp details.
They do make another error in saying Male for Male Victim rape and subsuming the female in an age range.
Piss-poor data entry. I notice everything.
Collect ALL the data or no, we cannot debate it.
It would entirely become a futile argument of ignorance.
They know this. Mathematically, you have no data.
Conveniently, they don’t have to change and lower the crime rate (toward zero) if you don’t know how badly they’re doing their job.
5% of the latest reported US crime was rape.
That’s absurdly high for such a specific and brutal crime.
(This is what happens when you don’t keep serial offenders off the streets).
1 in 20 criminal acts was rape. You need all the data, America.
If I hadn’t screencapped this, you probably wouldn’t have believed me.
Irony! The dramatic irony!
Statistically you’re more likely to suffer domestic violence than stranger violence. That is horrifying. You were over twice as likely to get raped as burgled (1.99% in 2016). Do the libertarians care about bodily rights? Statistically they should care twice as much as about burglaries. The average citizen is twice as likely to be raped as generally assaulted, do you consider non-sexual assault a real problem?
You call yourself the First World? Greatest nation on Earth? Please, lead by example.
We’re right there with you. Bring back the standards of civil behavior, the etiquette. Update it, sure, but you do need it back again, what little data you have is starkly apparent in this. Perhaps enshrined in law, to make sure everyone is clear.
Not all- is NOT how statistics work.
Using big words doesn’t make it a debate.
You are not sounding intelligent to anyone who uses their brain.
Demand more data and think for yourselves.
Fellow Westerners are not the enemy. It is those who keep you shrouded in ignorance and wasting your time attending a digital circus of vicious fallacies. Oh but the delivery of their lies is so sweet, right?
Not all (blank) – they cant.
They don’t have to be.
It’s a false equivalence.
Rape doesn’t belong in the First World and neither do hostile foreigners.
Hopefully you can see why they won’t let me near a television camera.
You’re only watching the puppets who never raise real points. You can’t settle real issues in a soundbite or cheeky Youtube clip.
“Boys will be boys” is pathological altruism enabling the psychopathic of the male population against everyone else and sexist infantilisation.
Note the link says one third that magically disappears.
Fake news, people who can afford to go to Waitrose are going to boutique butchers.
“One in eight”
“Britons is now vegetarian or vegan, according to a new report on food shopping that underlines a revolution in the UK’s eating habits.”
Invest in healthcare, there’s a boom in medical conditions on the horizon.
Veganism: The brain aging diet?
Vegetarian and vegan are totally different diets, stop conflating them, the false equivalence gives me a Vitamin B12 deficiency brain shrinkage headache.
There’s also the blatantly obvious fact that more plants increases pesticide ingestion. Organic plants still contain a lot of pesticide, increasing intake substantially (% of diet) will steamroll omnivore consumption.
Plus the animal and bug murder of ‘pest control’.
A five year-old could understand that making food involves killing things, that also want to eat your food. Biological competition?
Here’s where they sneak in the propaganda:
“A series of influential reports have said that avoiding meat and dairy products is the single biggest way consumers can reduce their environmental impact on the planet, because farming animals is such a CO2-intensive process.”
So is the article about a Waitrose survey or mysterious, unlinked (!) reports?
“Nick Palmer, the head of Compassion in World Farming UK says “Science proves that the healthiest diet is one that is plant-heavy. By eating less meat, fish, eggs and dairy
most food, then
and choosing higher welfare when we do, we can all help animals, people and the planet.””
Science proves – no, it doesn’t.
Source? There are certainly no solid studies like that on vegans. We’ve been looking but all they hand us is hand-waving conjecture and reddit-tier self-report. Scientism promotes the high-fructose diet of veganism and their skin shows it.
Also, people are animals. If you really wanted to help the planet, you’d commit suicide. Total extinction of your carbon footprint, as a carbon-based life form.
The Waitrose info seems to confirm it’s a static fad, as in, no new people are taking it up.
“Publication of the findings represents awkward timing for Waitrose.” PR. Fake news. A term banned in the press here now.
Faking data for the public should be illegal, especially when these people are dispensing medical advice.
Back to pure, organic bullshit:
“The number of vegans in the UK, who shun all animal products including dairy and eggs, has grown fourfold in the past four years from 150,000 to 600,000,”
Wait for it.
“…according to the Vegan Society.”
Would they lie to us? And that isn’t very encouraging considering rising obesity levels, what % of vegetarians and what % of vegans are overweight at all?
Look at the Waitrose data. There are tiny percentages involved.
For <50s, the number is static between age ranges. There is no movement.
The lines added represent the mean for almost all age groups, and it wobbles within 1-2%, nothing!
“Waitrose was the first UK supermarket to install dedicated vegan sections in 134 of its stores in May.”
Ah, this is an advert.
What’s the difference between a cucumber and a vegan cucumber?
What you do with it.
That justifies the price hike.
“This year, we’ve seen vegan food go mainstream” said Natalie Mitchell.
No, it isn’t, the rate of uptake isn’t higher with people under 30 or even 20.
If you’re gonna lie with statistics, get good with it?
“people are discovering that it tastes amazing.”
“Many of the vegan and vegetarian respondents said they missed bacon sandwiches and pork scratchings.”
“About 60% of vegans and 40% of vegetarians surveyed said they had adopted the lifestyle over the past five years, with 55% citing animal welfare concerns, 45% health reasons and 38% environmental issues.”
So what? Relevance? Make a different article proving that.
They don’t want to label halal meat, let alone ban its inhumane production in this country. They don’t care about the animals. Whatsoever.
There are no good studies I’ve seen on veganism altogether and vegetarian studies are fraught with method errors then environment – well, most new meat demand comes from China so you’re barking up the wrong tree. And their demand is only rising with their population boom.
That is not your imagination, Israel consumes BY FAR the most meat in the world (poultry value cinches it).
When are you shaming them, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and Peru?
Are the Guardian calling on the UK government to reduce production in this country of Halal and Kosher meat (insufficiently or not at all stunned, torturing the animal?) and to stop selling it abroad, increasing cruel meat demand? No? Then they don’t care about the animals.
“Scientific research published this year found that without meat and dairy consumption, global farmland use could be reduced by more than 75% – an area equivalent to the US, China, the EU and Australia combined – and still feed the world.”
So who eats the most meat? Clue – not white people! Are we all meant to go on rations (worse than rations, majority food group eradication) for the supposed benefit of other people in the world who don’t?
Shaming people for eating, they’re totally serious.
BCD – children deserve to develop properly and adults require adequate nutrition for fertility, especially women. I’m shocked the feminists are too dense to twig that shaming dairy is heavily sexist against women.
Before someone who can’t google gets triggered at the word ‘sexist’…
“Researchers in the United States have found a link between a low-fat dairy diet and increased risk of anovulatory infertility.” For one study.
There is definitely a link between veganism (worse, no dairy) and female infertility which remains unexplored.
“In the drinks aisle, Waitrose singles out the popularity of organic wine.”
Alcohol is proven to permanently damage your DNA. Health reasons, huh? Not signalling?
Wine doesn’t have mental benefits over beer, either. It’s false stereotype.
“Waitrose’s managing director, Rob Collins, said: “Being mindful of how we live and eat has become a priority in today’s world. As we become increasingly mindful of our own health, the wellbeing of our family and that of the planet, we’re reshaping how we shop, cook and eat.””
Read: consume less food so your betters can consume more, for the good of socialist globalism.
It won’t make you stupider, that’s impossible….
“It was this new meat diet, full of densely-packed nutrients, that provided the catalyst for human evolution, particularly the growth of the brain…”
Fun fact: A lot of Hollywood goes vegan because it allows their body to handle more drug abuse.
“Is Your Medicine Vegan? Probably Not”
The Darwin Awards need a Vegan section.
“Some people avoid products that are tested on or derived from animals, but don’t feel drug-use, smoking, and the like are directly related to the issue of animal cruelty.”
Here’s an illustration of the issue I take with surveys on diet.
I hand-typed this.
2007 – 3618 adults
2009 – 3219 adults
2010 – 548 adults
2011 – 1031 adults
2012 – 1491 adults surveyed.
2007 – 3% vegetarian (more female), 2% vegan (more men).
2009 – 3% vegetarian, 5% partially (WTF is that? That’s normal).
2010 – 2% adults AND children vegetarian. Less than 1% vegan.
2011 – 2% adults AND children vegetarian. Less than 1% vegan.
2012 – 2% adults AND children vegetarian. Less than 1% vegan.
Opposite politics, reporting the same shoddy “data”.
Thinks that make you go Hmmmmm….
What propaganda? Fake news is banned.
You don’t need a phrase like that.
“As of 2016, Asia Pacific held the largest share of vegan consumers globally, with approximately nine percent of people following a vegan diet in this area.”
I am shocked they would lie. Shocked and horrified.
Imagine my shock, dear viewer. Just picture it.
You could blow me down with a feather. Much disappointment in the Establishment.
I used to believe in academia, like Santa.
It’s like Clock Boy but retro forgeries in suspiciously European styles!
I’ve seen so much retconning of the gallery of famous scientists, engineers and inventors to include Muslims, despite zero actual evidence. When you have to invent historical smart people, it makes the recent lack of achievement stand out more? And what happened to your IQ since then? More inbreeding? It isn’t like you were barred from studying or working on it like the women, is it? And what’s with the helplessness then? Why do you need the West bringing you water in the desert if you’re so much fucking smarter than us? Why do you still have survival based problems about various diseases and Biblical style droughts? Why does every place that turns Muslim sink back about 500 years minimum in living standard? Why not have a Muslim sci-fi film and be fucking done with it? Like the cringefest that was Black Panther but beheading someone for making a tapestry of Allah.
Maybe making a tapestry of the beheading of the guy making a tapestry of Allah. How civilized!
Intellectual honesty and openness are racial (heritable) traits the East has never, ever had.
The European dark ages are a myth but the Islamic ones were never over!
They hate heliocentrism, they didn’t invent a fucking telescope to see other stars.
And they don’t get to claim the Ancient Egyptians either, while I’m at it.
Koran is very clear that the Sun revolves around the Earth and we’re the centre of the Universe. Stars cannot be Suns or else it involves awkward questions about gravity.
These people literally die of diarrhea in the current year because they wipe with their hand! They won’t pick up basic hygiene practices other peoples have been doing for thousands of years.
That’s why they fell for the desert nutjob religion. It plays into every animal impulse and condones it, they’re constantly in the news for raping and murdering their own daughters.
They are thick enough to immigrate into a degenerate Western culture and punish their relatives for growing up to emulate it.
It’s like the Jews claiming to be so fucking smart when they actively chose to settle in the desert then act like God was oppressing them. Sorry, no.