Alienation of affections

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/28/jilted-husband-awarded-8-8m-after-suing-wifes-lover.html

I wrote a post ages back on the old laws that protected marriage.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/07/04/which-laws-kept-marriages-intact/
“Protection from adultery is the crucial means of safeguarding marriage for future generations.”

Protection from cheats is one.

Marriage is a contract. Yes, you should be held to your oath of monogamy.

Holding the seducer responsible doesn’t divide the house.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/10/30/std-free-blood-tests-before-marriage-kept-it-good/

Also counts under criminal conversation. “Open marriage” cucking is effectively already illegal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_conversation

Way more expensive than a hooker.

How women feel being chatted up

Picture the bus or train creep.

They act like you engaged them in a conversation. That, or you owe them in their mind because forming a sentence is the new standard of bravery for numales. 0-60 or you’re a “bitch”, or, ironically a “whore”, which is who they should be soliciting for that. (Why don’t women like modern men? Maybe because you won’t stop insulting us for having human boundaries?)
Like a dog with a chew toy, they refuse to let you politely leave.
Nothing is more inane than how much they supposedly lift, how much they supposedly make, how good a ____ they supposedly are…

Inwardly:

This applies even if we fancy you at first. The interest level drops. Modern men are more vapid than the average woman in any previous time period. We’re instinctively repulsed by this. Men needed courting so we could slowly care about your bullshit.
What do you think the common whine ‘but he’s different!’ is referring to?

You’re insulting us. We aren’t shallow. You clearly are (with men, it’s science and porn doesn’t help). You get rejected. You call us shallow, despite turning down someone superficially a good catch. You brought it up?

Do you cuss out companies if they don’t select you for a job?

No, that would be stupid. Women talk, so this isn’t any less stupid.

Related to the deceptive guy who claims to be friendzoned (you said you just wanted to be friends, you said you didn’t want to date, you invited hang-outs…) mixed messages weirdos, becoming an ogre that totally justifies your rapedar instinct in .5 milliseconds – you were never in the running because women cannot think with a penis we do not have

At least they can’t complain of something else like strangerzoned. Entitled prissy bitches. It has never been socially acceptable to solicit people in the street. You aren’t arrested, that doesn’t make it normal or acceptable. You’re signalling that you lack social connections or skills to get any woman to pay social attention to you without chasing her. Literally, physically stalking her down a street and yes, it is stalking. At most, they offer you their number, you don’t have to ask. This is how socializing works and you don’t automatically assume it’s a sexual thing. Not everyone is desperate or looking.

OR

this, the apex of the loser pyramid

No means no but no also means fuck off when you have to repeat it.

You can’t change it. It’s biologically impossible. In thinking you can change it, there’s something wrong with you or you’re a rapist who doesn’t actually care what the lady thinks.

Inwardly:

We have a phrase “…who are you?” trans. for Americans: you are nothing to me, leave me alone.

It’s the original stay in your lane. Bosses use it too, it isn’t sexual. It can also mean stop talking if a person must be in a meeting room. It works by the power of awkward silence and body language, like …women.

Then after intruding on personal space in public (every society has rules), being rude repeatedly and trying to force interactions (up to physical contact, unwanted, unsolicited, technically illegal*), you present us with a choice to accept this hostile takeover bid or reject you.

Yes, I wonder why the rejection rate for cold approaches is almost 100%.

It’s a mystery for all of time.

I have witnessed women troll men who come up to them. Wastehistime was a response to wastehertime, if you look it up. As in, if you want to play emotional head games, women will win. I don’t advocate talking to anyone this desperate because as well as verbal hostility (ugly) they are probably literally violent.

Ask yourself, since male upper body strength is twice that of women, approximately the same divide as regular men to NFL players;

Why should we have to let down gently an entitled stranger who wasn’t smacked as a child?

…Exactly, they’re not our problem. We escape the situation.

The men complaining about women who complain about harassment is like playing spot the vegan but reducing your rape odds. They could go to a gay bar for a month and report on what it’s like…..? They never do.

What to do?

Don’t approach strangers randomly. We can see the stink lines of desperation. We’re embarrassed for you. Think: do they talk to me like a child? Well, you don’t know this is something humans don’t do. So yeah. Valid.

*you can’t just go up grabbing people, that’s assault
if it’s only friendly, you’d do it with men as often

You want a connection, expand your friend groups. Yes, hard work, like all relationships. This also controls for people on your own level who will respond to you.

Note:

Bitch is now a compliment solely because these losers have changed the accepted definition of it.

What is sexual coercion? (hint: not consensual)

It’s a positive sign when the sluts and manwhores kvetch over this information getting out.

It’s a great way of outing rapists, like the vegan test. Just discuss rape by fraud and out pop the rapists.

Oddly they’ll talk about male rape as a red herring, when men are probably coerced as much as women based on porn myths i.e. men always want it.

These are your rights. Your right to personal sovereignty, physical power over your own body. They don’t want potential victims to know their rights.

Like, there’s nothing wrong with being a consumer, but purchasing stolen goods is still illegal. Fraud is always possible.

http://www.consented.ca/consent/coercion/
“It’s not that they did not say “no,” but that they could not say “no.””
People will happily admit duress is wrong, but make it something physical, than written… suddenly they argue it’s ‘complicated’ – no.

http://www.loveisrespect.org/content/what-sexual-coercion/

Or you could stop blaming the victim and simply bring back seduction law, which prevented some of the lesser-known forms of rape. (Because consent needs to be fully, truthfully informed).

Seduction is a form of abusive manipulation. It’s sick that society uses the term to mean something admirable.

Seduction is illegal under English common law. Simply enforce it.
Most of the American system is based on it too. Sinatra was charged with it.

Link: The evolution of female choice in seduction

https://aeon.co/essays/why-do-the-most-flamboyant-males-have-the-evolutionary-edge

True signals or GTFO.

boom suck it

In evolution, the carrier is the more valuable parent.  Inviolable truth.

If you aren’t a parent, evolutionally, your life is meaningless. Ouch.

The sex with costlier decisions has the power (right of refusal). The other proves their worth.

Also, parthenogenesis.

Link: Sign of K-shift – PUA shaming

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3420433/TINDER-WARNING-Woman-tricked-sleeping-man-met-dating-app-shames-sticking-posters-showing-photo-workplace.html

All the hallmarks of a PUA, including the over-reliance on drinking spots.

They're so stupid it's a laughriot

Man seduces woman, woman publicly shames him.

Sounds fair, actually. Even the r-selected are turning, slowly. It’s always the women who shift first.

Seduction laws will be brought back in soon enough and there’s no deadline on criminal prosecutions (no sexism either). I hope the PUAs have a savings account for all the lawyers they’ll need (name and other identity fraud will make it worse, as previously covered).

The best part is that, by PUA theory, it wasn’t harassment at all (and so he can’t legally claim that) because she was doing him a favour. AMOGing over local men and a severe DHV as a player. She might as well have written “Serial Seducer” above his name and photo.

Her reputation management would help her. His ‘shame’ would simultaneously protect K-women, who are forewarned, and attract the sluts. Gossip is totally legal and it isn’t defamation if it’s true, he has no legal recourse whatsoever.

Comparing it to violent rape is pretty cheap but this woman is r-selected (Tinder) turning K, what do you expect in transition?
Seduction and its modern equivalent, rape-by-fraud are considered in many ways practically similar anyway (legally, coercion vitiates consent).

For those who dispute the existence of conditional consent, we have seen it already in the manosphere: consider that consent is always conditional between two parties. As a social contract. For example, a heterosexual man’s consent is conditional on his partner’s biological sex as female. Hence, a deceptive transsexual raped him. If it applies to men in dresses, it applies to men without.

Seduction starts within marriage

http://www.yourtango.com/200941926/how-seduce-difficult-women

It’s short but the man speaks the truth.

It’s like being rich. Becoming rich is the easy part, staying rich is the kick.

If you care less after you’ve signed your life over, you shouldn’t have married them. When you stop trying, the marriage is over. A marriage is a dual effort.

Also, it handily points out the American mistake: it takes far more work to keep one woman happy forever than a number of cheaper ones for a few weeks at a time. The best seducers have the loyal marriages to the best wives.