But that would save civilization

Trust r-types to come up with the best anti-dysgenics plan yet, out of an attempt at humour.

You take the bullets out of the gun before you wave it around, rather than covering everyone in Kevlar, logically.

Finally, a rite of passage I could get behind.

The financial and social burdens (approval) to enter matrimony used to put a damper on bad unions so a more technical approach must be considered. If you’re so alpha, why be concerned you won’t pass the fitness tests? The MRAs could be happy no fiendish, evil woman would sperm rape them, no more ghetto, no more alimony, everybody’s happy!

Literally 100% of women would endorse this plan, unless they’re spermjackers.

Seriously, all women would endorse this, unless parasitic. Only the reproducing rapists of men would disagree too. It literally cannot go tits up, my dudes. Think of the savings in the welfare system, for starters. That’s less tax necessary right there. Fewer screaming future criminals born into the world. Imagine the triggering of the Left at having no victim class to lord it over, no dysfunction sociologically. Instead, we nip their future voters in the bud, an existential genocide. They wanted to be replaced, right? CALL THEIR BLUFF. Pay all men a bonus of 10k to get it done upon 18 (and possibly to avoid the draft). Seriously. And get check-ups to ensure it holds. We’d end poverty overnight! The biggest predictor of poverty is premature parenthood! They can fund a future and have better odds of marrying well then too. Everyone wins!

Most Boomers wouldn’t exist if abortion laws weren’t brought in by them, but some years earlier. The hippies would’ve killed themselves. As the hippy mutates in every generation, imagine they just… stop. No oops babies for the manosphere to fake cry about. Everybody wins! It’s like our version of the Spartan selection. All you have to do is prove you’re not a fuck-up. Anyone with an IQ above a hundred can do that, if they choose. Imagine that culture of duty and honour. (fans self) It’s anti-Idiocracy. Galton would approve. All child related welfare would end overnight, including the immigrant breeding competition. The rationale of war widows is long gone. You chose to wed, you chose to bred, you can fund them all by yourselves instead. Therefore, the ‘anti-racists’ should logically support a move that quells anti-immigrant sentiment, by treating them like responsible adults. Spread your seed, pay to breed. Children are the ultimate luxury expense.

However, this would only work if ALL unmarried men had to do it (and already-married men also had to pass the tests of basic stability, mentally and financially). We don’t live in a tribal society anymore, solutions must be sweeping. Since men don’t carry the babies in this species, there’s no issue with medical side effects (and extraction under local is possible). Test all children at birth for paternity, publish the results in a public database and the system is rock-solid, all married men have assurance (or shame). If a married man sires a child adulterously, it’s easy to prove (paternity fail) and he is legally forced to get the snip-snip (a stigma and deterrent) and his wife can sue for the adultery (illegitimate children presenting a legal threat to their pre-established contract, maintaining the Biblical sanctity of the marital union in culture and encouraging women to marry out of this sense of safety). It’s a perfect system where everyone is kept honest. I think even MGTOW could agree to this. The problem genes in the species would die out. Degeneracy would disappear, gradually receding into small pockets over time until it went extinct entirely. It used to be underground and controlled for a reason. Rapists would fail in their strategy of stealing reproduction as a choice from women (so most rape would not happen, contra Freud’s blatantly dishonest assertions) or be easily caught. The moral culture would be gentrified and entitled parents would no longer exist because conception is not an accident. Most mental illness would also vanish. What is the downside? The Pill has already partially accomplished this, e.g. gay guys complain the gay ‘community’ is shrinking because many r-women who’d produce them are functionally infertile – but women aren’t responsible for the main r-strategy, literally called sneaky fucker in evobio literature. It’s the young dumb, and full of cum demo of low IQ men. We all know it.

Do you want to play Russian Roulette with the species?

The Pill damages women’s fertility in the long-term (look at gen X and IVF) and they’re giving it out to minors like smarties, for a long term use its inventor advised against, so this flip is really the only responsible solution. Surgical solutions on women would impair childbearing ability. This way would kill postmodernism forever, while allowing superficial bread and circuses to soothe the unfit (to be parents). It’s heavily patriarchal and gives men all the social power while allowing the cream to, er, rise. And replicate. Men improve as a group, genetically. Stupid women go barren as the viable men don’t want them. Women cannot deceive men as to their intentions. Women are respected as babymakers, but in a way we’d all agree with – protectively, no toxic pill chemical expectations poisoning our womb all because men can’t ice themselves for one afternoon. It isn’t like it’s every month for a week, is it? As Nature/God’s design intended, before the Industrial Revolution screwed us all over as a species with urban IQ shredders. There are also fewer great beauties among women because modelling and marrying with the Pill took them out of the breeding population, this would encourage those women back, with enhanced status to viable men and grant prestige amongst women. Women would get more feminine and beautiful as a sex, because all women have a natural desire to reproduce (conscious or not) and modern men pretend we don’t (to their own demise, sometimes). Easy sex has meant the ugliest women could breed, this reverses that trend. Forever. Natural selection of unfit female genes would thereby be restored, without reversing advances in gynecology. Femcels would actually exist and the baby rabies motive in the most rabid of SJWs would be laid bare for all of society to see. It would be undeniable and the power balance, interesting to see. If you only got it reversed to get married, divorce rates would plummet because the husbands would all be mentally stable, capable of leading strong families.

Again, marriage used to connote this filtration purpose – for MEN. By withholding their paternity for a woman who is worthy, wife material. Think about it.

In reality, looks and IQ correlate. And what man doesn’t want wide hips?

Hoes would need to work in Costco. Imagine it. You say muh female accountability and responsibility sure, but the only way to en-FORCE is to impose it, since women are the passive sex in the species and mirror changes in men with a brief time delay e.g. hyper sexual culture. You cannot affect change in women without first changing all men. It’s biologically impossible. This is genius. Smarter people on average by default. As national IQ rises, so does national GDP and life outcomes of the citizenry. There is no downside unless you’re a spiteful mutant.

As a society, we need to stop acting like women get themselves pregnant. It’s a curious, irrational mental block in the chain of biological causation. It’s such an elegant solution I had to post.

There is literally no downside to that plan. We clearly need a synthetic fitness test to match our synthetic era. Begin with a countersignal, it’s brilliant! It’s hilarious this is horror dystopia to a guy who will clearly never convince a woman to reproduce with him by conscious selection. It culls only r, who hate kids anyway. We’re sparing children abusive, ‘permissive’ parents and it’s 100% Biblical (the connection to God shown by the men, who might do an Onan with their own wife – this avoids that, it gets reversed to get wed – beautiful!). We’d stop seeing atheist couples treat matrimony like a narcissistic party with no fruitfulness (DINKs). Pretty much only conservatives would breed, and seeing as how partisanship is mostly genetic in studies, the Left would be dead. If neocons were smart, they’d come up with this stuff. Appeal to the high time preference by encouraging their genetic suicide tendencies. The political centrists have already Pilled themselves out of existence (a chemical abortifacient, see above – the Pill replicates the miscarriage effect of endometriosis, it’s secretly evil) but men shagging women on it never considered themselves responsible for potential abortion (unlike God). Two absolute facts (common sense) of any high IQ civilization: 1. Men are responsible for their seed, not women. 2. The Pill gave women too much power, I said it. Short of banning it, because you’re all the real pussies here, this evens the odds and feminists couldn’t complain because mens’ body, their choice to breed, since if all men got it by law there’d be no more sneaky fucker strategy, no alphas ripping the rest of you off (see seduction law for how that turned out, America) nor paternity issues with random cads concerning married men – also women couldn’t bitch about side effects, there’d be no need to take it without genuine medical requirement. It spares women suffering, including rape babies! The feminists should be cheering this on! The only valid reason for abortion -barring a fluke fatality risk- would disappear overnight. SHOW ME THE DOWNSIDE HERE, SJWs.

nb Men would have all the power in courtship again but no manwhores could complain because they’re freer than before!

If society wishes to treat fertility like a medical pathology, let’s be reasonable.

The fallacy of poor analogy where a fuck-up of a man (future deadbeat) is synonymous with a rape victim is my only problem with that tweet’s metaphor.
Technically, just enforce the patriarchal law that men have zero rights to a child if they failed to marry the mother. That’s literally why men got married, to have a legal right. If you’re not married to her, that is not your child legally and you have no say.
Conservatives already figured this all out millennia ago. It’s in the Bible.
It tells men to avoid seductive women, fornication and adultery i.e. only sleep with your wife. A man had no legal rights to illegitimate children, because they were so. Most of the West’s ills are due to this socialist oversight. Yes, the woman would have to go it alone, but compared to….? It’s either that or shotgun weddings by definition. Imagine if all deadbeats were forced to marry the mother/s of their babies and support them, to relieve the rest of us for caring for sprogs we didn’t consent to make (a policy of: not my orgasm, not my problem). America’s Idiocracy failing is the moral failing of recognising deadbeats as legitimate fathers. They are not patriarchs, that is a privilege (the woman consents to marry, easy to prove) and not a right or entitlement in any civilised society. It protects a family’s rights to approve of their child’s reproduction choice (as the fruit of their investment and marital contract). You can’t protect anything without deterrents, even an empty house will attract druggies wanting to do smack. Also, prevent second spouses (in a cinderella effect) from taking what is due to the rightful heirs of the first union. This is easily done and actually what a patriarchal culture would practise, over the laddish cult of hedonic cads dodging responsibility for their own fuck-ups, expecting everyone else to pick up the welfare bill while simultaneously feeling entitled to all the privileges of fatherhood. Men honour their commitments.

to avoid obvious questions based on post rarity:

re Robin Hood, I did say Zoomers would be losers. It’s only just begun.
Their data is more valuable than their trade, RH users are morons. All the data feeds into AI algos that pre-empt them and due to fibre optics, win. You’re paying the casino to look at all your cards while playing against you, basically.

re Trumpkin
Calm before.

re me
still not dead, and that’s amazing, considering. There’s a very long, comprehensive list of people I have pissed off. Mostly hiding in my BOL in the country. It’s great. Wifi sucks. Various celebrities are following suit. Isn’t it weird how half of Hollywood has gone quiet and people who used to get photographed constantly dropped off the map?
Hoping there’s no EMP because Chicoms may get pissy if their invasion plan is thwarted. Half of Hong Kong arriving in England would make Boris look just as based as I always claimed he was. As you know, I’m his biggest fan. The perma-vaccine push every four months looks less like ‘crazy conspiracy’ every damn day. Nobody listen to Cassandra! I am very used to it!
We’ll probably be fine. 85%. If somebody kills Trump I’ll be worried.

The usurper won’t last long.

Currently: watching a video of Mads Mikkelsen doing the drop splits. It’s been a rough year.

Family units are made by avoiding family destroyers

Weird I’m shown this after watching ONE Better Bachelor video. Almost like these education videos make the r-types reeee. Hey, when anything gets big it becomes mainstream info and you can’t put the rattlesnake back in the bag. The narcissism signs channels also get pushed (go incognito to see)…. silly broflakes. Aren’t you ‘proud’ if you’re doing ‘nothing wrong’?

Much is said online of f-f gaslighting, like SJW propaganda that all men are scum but m-f gaslighting is more damaging to society and its future prospects, especially when deceptively aimed at sheltered K-women to impair bonding and exploit that damage. You get the rare female ‘player’ types like Amber Heard but all these antisocial tricks are sociopathic so it’s just ASPD prevalence in the population anyway. Sociopaths are scum, there are just more male ones. If I didn’t grow up in a redpill household I might’ve fallen for some of these myself, women are too trusting, it’s the oestrogen. It’s a genetic fallacy to assume the quality of men acting toward women is the same as the 1950s, let alone 1850s, and since men lead society, the bad example brings everyone down by standard. Moral decline is male-led.
However, society (America, cornerstone of The West) has become more psychopathic – hedonic, sexually promiscuous, violent crime/sadistic media, no future goals, parasitic lifestyle, compulsive (sweet) lies, takes no responsibility (hypoagency in adults). The Weinsteins have written the rulebooks. Hollywood romcoms suck ON PURPOSE. Happily married women don’t go to see them!
Men are natural liars, hence the glibness and superficial charm of psychopaths, who are almost exclusively male. Also, all great actors are men because men are natural born liars, character is overcoming that for integrity. That’s why female character doesn’t work the same and female liars are considered masculine (usually lesbian). If you have sisters, mothers, daughters, friends you care about, help the fellow Ks to avoid r-types in ALL forms. There is no Sisterhood or Bro Code, those are collectivist (multicultural*) r-select psyops. They are thought-terminating cliche to gaslight a group that translate as ‘injure your prospects to benefit me’. Toxic friendships are one thing, avoiding deadbeats saves LIVES.

*anti-patriotic

Shannon writes: “Tell yourself all the things you want to hear. “I’m beautiful, smart,etc…so you are not waiting for a man to tell you what you already know. Men will say and do anything to just use you. Know your worth!”

Good advice to avoid all glib predators. I grew up hearing nice things so when I heard them from users, I just shrugged and agreed because my parents loved me…. this pissed them off. This was instructive. Predators hate healthy self-esteem so they try to enable the insecurity of the young (parenting other people’s kids – creepy!) to make for easier pickings later or outright target the young (legally or illegally). Pedos are just the lazy sexual predators, all humans are objects to them, some on the lowest shelf to grab.
‘Game’ is not normal, it’s a term describing the gaslighting of sexual slavery. It normalises sexual predation, something patriarchy always condemned. It is actively anti-K by exploiting that gene pool and damaging its monogamous courtship model, it’s sexual strategy sabotage of Ks by r. We need to establish ways to raise good children who can navigate the low-trust psychopathic society. There’s no ability to mince words because well-raised children ARE naive.

Monet: “I always hear men say “Women don’t know what they want” heard that my whole life everywhere”
Only from the low IQ ones, projecting. They wait to see a woman they like and conform to her, for a while. PDs do this, especially BPD and HPD. Women seem to have life goals as teens: marriage yes, kids yes, where to live. Men are more freeform and the dumb ones have no concrete plans at all. Voting was based on property ownership to exclude the useless nomadic bachelor and Sparta actively taxed them for being parasites. Low IQ people project, it’s just that statistically, there are more low IQ men than women and society doesn’t notice the women due to normal socialisation skills.
Anytime you hear a sweeping statement complaint, with no data (or the contrary data) then it’s a projection. So much cope. If women were aimless and useless, the female suicide rate would dwarf the male and we don’t live in that world. The low IQ complain of a thing while also denying it in the same sentence because they assume everyone else is too stupid to notice too. Women have higher verbal IQs, that’s why women are turned off so many men. It’s our way of testing their IQ. So women want to TALK – in person, which shits up low IQ men. They panic without the digital crutch. Anyone can sound smart online (allo allo allo). They have to check-in with other men what to say because they’re too stupid to form a sentence (ghetto women too, both groups low IQ). The romance novel leads are always ELOQUENT. PUAs sell communication copy/paste hackjobs.
“Women don’t know what they want” – projection AND gaslighting. Women aren’t confused, they just disagree with you – probably because you’re stupid. These men who constantly bump into ‘crazy’ people never like to be asked, have you ever tried to see it through their eyes?

Low IQ has no insight, no empathy.

They need forums of other predators because their interpersonal retardation requires a collective hivemind, spoon-feeding ‘insights’ by crowd sourcing. They cannot think by themselves. They read every trendy self-improvement book going*, too. Trash brains.

Have you ever considered, you might be stupid? Smart people do. Stupid people don’t (fragile ego) and never ever improve, so all other people are ‘crazy’ or have an ‘attitude problem’. Maaaybe it’s you. Low IQ cannot mentalise somebody smarter than they are, so cognitive dissonance rationalises as ‘crazy’ or in cases of morality ’emotional’. Yes, serial killers view it like this too. They only killed three people omg.

Arm mothers and daughters with wisdom.

*Antisocial predators hate people discussing their ‘tactics’. Even tactics is aggressive language re intimacy. It’s not a war. The violence is implied by a predator/prey dynamic. A sneaky underhand coercive predation. Greene’s ‘seduction’ book (seduction is still illegal on American law books) calls the woman the ‘target’ – but all they want is fuzzy romance, right?

Russell Brand on Joker

It’s sad this guy of all people has a better take on this than the average right-wing youtuber.

Nice until we’re not basically. Classism from plutocracy. It isn’t about means of production but native resources. You can’t pull yourself up by your bootstraps… if you don’t have boots.

comment

WTF! Is that really Russell Brand? This is brilliant best Joker review on YouTube and spoiler free on top of that

r-types do understand what they’re doing, they’re just over-estimating their intelligence and competence

consumer culture and such, they know

cultural deprivation of survival needs, including right to self identity (the new patriotism gap is filled by the tranny stuff, imaginary identities), it’s needed for sanity, hence not in the hierarchy

cultural treason, betrayal of meritocracy

they’ll pretend to wanna work with us in the future, to control and subvert, as you see him cuck toward the end

convenient timing

they’ll be like a cult and want a ton of slaves, r-types are easy to spot by no pair bonding ability

think termite mound implosion, you don’t want to align with predatory men, they screw men too

Penny dropped, has it?

Casual Sex Creates Guilt


Wow, it really is the current year.

What’s next, AOC admits Communism/socialism has been tried and always failed?

He’d have done better going with Islam, his ancestral religion.
I wonder how long this will last.

Drug-based religious epiphanies are fake. They’re always deceitful, demonic in nature.

That’s why ‘shamans’, savages and all sorts of occulty bullshit rely on it, including self-aware Satanists.

It’s an illusion and half the attendees of Burning Man experience the same drug-based ‘revelations’.

If God’s word didn’t move you for decades, it wasn’t that. He’s talking about the world, too worldly for it to have been real. He’s also preaching with zero grounds. No humility.

Still, it does seem like he always knew it was wrong to slut around and did it anyway, suggesting a false conversion to control the religious with false piety and twisting lies akin to the CHINO kind. Cynically, it could be a gamble to make money off a fresh demo. In which case, Muslims have more money.

You can’t ‘game’ God into a place in Heaven, nobody will listen to a sinner from the church and this won’t allow him control over white women. It’s laughable if he thinks he can dominate women as a man, women who believe men ain’t shit compared to God.

He seems to be repeating, almost word for word, what many people among us have been saying for years (while he slagged us off for it):

“Sleeping around is the most common example. Outside the confines of love and family, sex is perverse and immoral, because it denies the reproductive aspect of humanity to treat others as masturbatory tools that are used and discarded.”

That’s called objectification and it’s dehumanizing. Congratulations, you agree with the feminists on something (although objectification does exist, it’s connected to the Sexual Revolution, Patriarchy usually protects its women).

“It turns out that men who have received sexual pleasure from sluts will then attack sluts for being… sluts.”

He discovered the wikipedia page on projection. But men who sleep with female sluts are ALSO sluts, that’s what a slut is.


It’s also Madonna/Whore, men who are repulsed by ‘good girls’ as sexual options or cheat on the wife instead of loyalty, with a slutty mistress.

It is a mistake to assume everyone is guilt filled and projecting though.
If they’re not loudly going after people and quietly going about it, they’re probably just naturally promiscuous. Rare, but occurs.

“scarcity of eggs-”
myth, women actually produce new eggs during post-birth life, it’s been studied and that myth debunked
the male gamete constantly refreshes, compounding mutation rates

“shortened window of fertility” paternal age is a huge factor in miscarriage, stillbirth and sub-fertility in men as well, especially after 30 quality starts to drop and after 40 especially (see paternal age tag)
the high autist rate is something researchers have openly blamed on the ‘trend’ for older fathers, trying to deter them from waiting, which the MSM hasn’t amplified as important because it hates you

“You see this in black, Asian, and Indian women who attack “white privilege” and “white supremacy” while simultaneously dating white men or being attracted to them.”

going after white fever, brave

Push that button if you want ANY influence. Sex issues are so 2010, now it’s all about race.

“Other behaviors that create guilt are masturbation, especially with the aid of hardcore pornography, and sodomy, which are both direct forms of self-abuse.”

Both sexes masturbate in their sleep naturally, zero guilt I’ve ever seen reported in studies. If God designed us, that one gets a free pass. Unless it’s the baby Jesus buttplug. Porn causes guilt because it’s voyeurism.

‘Straight’ men engaging in anal are at new risk of previously only homo-common diseases.

and less navel-gazing, America

FIX the problems rather than a circlejerk TALKING.

Priceless inclusion given:

“If I didn’t stop having casual sex, I would find new and ingenious ways to insult women.”

I’m sorry his sister died and all, preventing me from temporarily using harsher words about this convenient conversion, but this guy is sounding like a brown Russell Brand.
Acting like a beast doesn’t ever become washed off the record and to assume one is forgiven before death is pure Churchian. To lecture as if one has moral authority from doing evil is pure Satan. Hubris?
I get the feel why so many of these guys are ‘finding’ Jesus is because they want the Have it all I predicted YEARS ago – they want to fuck around with sluts in the pussy parade then have a Christian (best religion for this) waifu once their T-levels drop and they aged out of clubs.

That won’t happen. You need decades to prepare to be a good husband.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/05/29/global-christianity-is-still-globalism/

I don’t spare dishonest women from critique either.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/05/11/is-homemaker-the-new-welfare-queen/

but the I told ya so is STRONG

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/01/27/born-again-christians-are-the-worst-cucks/

COPE, manwhores, COPE.

The wages of sin last for decades. Seeing how old PUAs end up will be an object lesson.

In the comments are race-mixing guys trying to claim (appeal to exception) that their kids are different or (gag) better.
Thankfully the odd person is pointing out the basic scientific facts, more or less 1. those kids self-hate, since there’s no place for them in the world and they belong nowhere 2. those kids are clinically depressed and 3. they have health issues (so write off grandkids or great-grandkids). No progeny? Wasted investment. Don’t marry any woman based on sex appeal (esp. fetish), duh?

There’s also direct Bible admonishment: https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/03/10/they-dont-quote-this-line/

http://biblehub.com/proverbs/5-20.htm

For why should you, my son, be exhilarated with an adulteress And embrace the bosom of a foreigner?

among other choice lines

comment

“I’d rather become a monk/hermit instead of wifing up a different race than mine or a white slut.

Wait until the Tiger Mom divorces kick in with the next recession.

Asians only stay if you pay.

When your income grows stale, they bail!

Grace trumps race in regards to salvation, but not in the material world. Miscegenation is forbidden by the moral law, yet unless you don’t know some biblical Greek you’ll never know.

I am not a friend of the CI movement, but they have some interesting truth nukes you cannot argue with (scroll down to “The Sixth Commandment”): http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/nl720.htm”

Here it is:

“In most translations of the Bible, Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are translated: “Thou shalt not commit adultery.” In the literal translation of the Anointed Standard Translation of the New Testament and in the true translation of the Ten Commandments in The Truth Unveiled, these passages are translated as: “You will not mongrelize”.

In many people’s minds, there is a very great difference between these two translations, though, as we shall see later, this is due primarily to the purposeful degeneration of the etymology of the word adultery. At issue in the Greek Septuagint and in the Greek New Testament are two Greek words: ou moicheuseis. …

In the Latin Vulgate, Exodus 20:13 was translated as non moechaberis and Romans 13:9 as non adulterabis. The Latin word moechaberis is an inflected form of moechari, a transliteration of the Greek moicheuo, and is of little etymological importance since what it means is merely dependent upon what the Greek word means, which we will explore. However, what is important is adulterabis, an inflected form of the word adultero, since this is the Latin word most often used in the Vulgate and elsewhere to translate the Greek word moicheuo. 

The Greek word ou and the Latin word non are simply negative particles, translated not. Thus, the words that we need to define in order to determine the correct translation of Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are the Greek word moicheuo and the Latin word adultero. 

I am rarely impressed but congratulations.

First, in order to define the word moicheuo, let us turn to a commonly used and commonly available dictionary, the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, edited by Gerhard Kittel and translated into English by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Now let us note that Kittel was a well-renowned German Greek scholar and is held in high-esteem by the scholarly community. 

Under the entry word moicheuo, the following definition is given: “of the intermingling of animals and men or of different races.” [In the German original, Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament, we find the original words of Kittel: “auch von Vermischung von Tier und Mensch oder von Mischung verschiedener Rassen”]. 

This, of course, is the classical definition of mongrelization. So the Greek of the New Testament and the Greek Septuagint confirm that the translation “You will not mongrelize” is correct. 

Now that we have defined the Greek, what about the Latin Vulgate? Now we must define the Latin word adultero, and we shall do so using the finest Latin dictionary currently available and the standard among Latin scholars, the Oxford Latin Dictionary: “To mix (a substance or kind) with another, adulterate: to impair the purity or strength of, to give a variety of appearances to, change . . . to corrupt, debase.” Once again, when this is applied to people, we have mongrelization. So we find age-old agreement between the Latin and the Greek. 

Wow.

This explains their group-level reproductive issues, if explicitly forbidden by God.

Among other details like marital problems, notably the domestic abuse rate.

And divorce rates.

Therefore, using two of the most respected reference works available regarding Biblical Greek and the Latin language, and simply looking the words up, we find that these verses in the Bible are in fact an explicit prohibition against race-mixing. 

To any intellectually honest person, the above definitions should be more than enough to convince him that the Bible explicitly prohibits race-mixing. This is exactly why the coalition of evil is so against a true and literal translation of the Word of God. In fact, it may be stated that their theology is little more than a justification system for the breaking of this divine law of God. If the translation You will not mongrelize is wrong, then the two reference works cited above, certainly two of the most prestigious works of their type available, are also wrong. Any legitimate Greek or Latin scholars would agree with these definitions; anyone who would disagree with these definitions have in fact turned their backs on legitimate scholarship and should stop being hypocritical and admit that they do not believe the Bible instead of trying to change what it and what legitimate scholars say.

Now, many people will simply go and find a dictionary that defines the above words as adultery, and then ignorantly presume that adultery is defined as marital infidelity and simply forget about the two definitions cited above.

To show the stupidity and intellectual dishonesty of these people, I have previously written a work entitled Hidden Truth, now published under the title The Truth Unveiled, which gave many more proofs of the definitions of the Greek and Latin family of words commonly translated adultery, and examined in detail every Biblical passage, both Old and New Testaments, where these words occurred. That is not the purpose of this present work. The reader is encouraged to also read the chapter regarding this family of words in The Truth Unveiled for a complete Biblical analysis of this family of words. The objective herein is to examine in detail the etymology of both the Greek and Latin words commonly translated adultery, the ways these words were used in other Greek and Latin literature and in key passages in the Bible, and to explore how the web of deception regarding these words has been woven through the degeneration of language. The information presented hereafter is indisputable and not a subject of debate: one will either be intellectually honest and believe it or one will suffer the fate of all liars and those who help make a lie. 

Bloody hell, a gentleman and a scholar.


God split the peoples of the world, this was his will.
The mental and physical health issues prove it.

Why will the sluts deny this?

R-selected men sexually select the outgroup, it’s a dominant indicator of what they are.
This is known.
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/128777-a-man-s-sexual-choice-is-the-result-and-the-sum
A man who wants kids with the outgroup is an inferior and he’s backing the horse that might accept him.

““A man’s sexual choice is the result and the sum of his fundamental convictions…. He will always be attracted to the woman who reflects his deepest vision of himself, the woman whose surrender permits him to experience a sense of self-esteem. The man who is proudly certain of his own value, will want the highest type of woman he can find, the woman he admires, the strongest, the hardest to conquer–because only the possession of a heroine will give him the sense of an achievement.””

They bet on a future where you are dead, the Beige people world of NWO planning.

The term is race traitor for a reason. There can be no bargaining with people who want to kill you just as assuredly as suicide bombers. They are actively genociding their white DNA (literally gene-cide*) and replacing you like a cuckoo baby in your homeland (they never wanna move out…). No white woman will submit to them out of disgust, they’re almost entirely gammas. Some are involuntary race mixers because no fellow white will have them! Non-whites use them for babies, green cards and money. Among Asians, white>masculinity, that’s why the same guys almost never land objectively better looking Latinas, where it’s inverted and masculinity is prized.

Prove me wrong, internet. How long do fetish spouses last in hard times?

It isn’t a unique (and biologically validated) disgust:

Why do blacks reject mulattoes because something something colorism?

Why do these guys (pictured) all have the same Look, and only land Asians without trouble?

and the eternal classic

Hence, white gammas go weeb. It’s science, more or less.

Frankly, this one looks gay as John Barrowman.

Gays think they’re in the closet because they’re on that r-select sexual spectrum, preferring less dimorphic women.

Why do all weebs have this soft, shriveled look? Some group of men get together and figure this out.

I’ll be called jealous of women with no waist or hips…. somehow.

*Non-whites gain more than 50% dominance breeding with whites, with our recessive genome, hence the fetish for us globally.
I’ve linked to it at some point here. It was mentioned alongside genetic distance.

comment

“The other races (Negroids and Mongoloids) have been created way earlier than the Caucasoids, which is archaelogically and genetically proven. The blue-eyed-gene for example goes back to exactly one common ancestor. Then how comes no Asian or African has colored eyes?”

True but there’s also multi-regional hypothesis.

“You can read in different historical accounts about the decay that (only) mulatto societies have upon morals and environment.

In no small part to lower IQ than the purebred parents and r-selected sexual strategy (quantity over quality) depressing quality of living. The Third World chooses to be poor, because they choose to have too many children. It’s as simple as that. The low IQ detail is compounded in each generation by improper breeding habits, since crime (like rape) and libido are both higher in that demographic, in any race. If they’re gonna infanticide any sex, the ones who rape and rebel would be better candidates. Then there’s the fact each race evolved to its environment and the mixed race (technically raceless) are not well-adapted to any environment, so you’d expect them to comparatively fail in every environment, since it’s about Darwinian genetic competition with those who didn’t mix. I blame the parents who chose this for them. They’d be most competitive to live in the lower IQ society of one of the parents. That’s why conqueror’s kids are an exception, higher IQ DNA dissolving into a lower IQ society (too low is/should be wiped out) succeeds better than the natives, in that case. It fails when reversed.

Change the white society, lose the society.

Needs more genetics, more studies. Generally correct.

What does ‘good breeding’ actually mean? K-select.

Race-mixers are also, in studies, less attractive on average than same-race counterparts. Children are the IQ mean of the individual parents. Look at the national IQs of these brood women and that’s a terrible mean, plus regression to the mean pulling kids down anyway. Galton, ironically.

The darker a person’s skin, the higher their testosterone, again, compounding the r-selection.

Those white guys will find their beige kids resentful, slutty and probably drawn to SJW politics because in their utopia, everybody belongs. They’ll learn, too late.

Elliot Rodger, that Yang Marxist, more to come, I’m sure.

In the Travels of Marco Polo you have an account (Book I, Chapter 14) in which fair-skinned Tartars took black Indian wifes. The mixed race offspring ravaged the city of Camandu, and even acquired magical and diabolical knowledge they used for their raids.

You may have good intentions but misinformation and lacking in knowledge creates more evil than good. As it is written in Hosea 4:6:
My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.”

comment

“Instead, he bangs them and then refuses to take part ownership in his own degeneracy.”
Blaming ‘culture’ and ‘society’ and the women is still evading shame. Shame is personal and earned, the bad rep.

What do you expect? They’re r-types! Mentally more akin to a child! Gimme brains!

Let the weeb Other his own kids, as long as he’s happy to self-deport with them when the homeland thing becomes the global norm… again.

That’s in the peaceful scenario.

The SJWs hate ALL white men, even their own father.

Race-mixing won’t be any kind of defense when they come for you, too.

Proof, in the Bible: “21 Brother will betray brother to death, and a father his child; children will rise against their parents and have them put to death.”

https://biblehub.com/matthew/10-21.htm

Prediction: Roosh will go some kind of Buddhist then Muslim then a weird hybrid.

Because my my my how the tables have fucking TURNED.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/03/05/roosh-on-the-alt-right-in-his-own-words/

“The alt right is worse than feminism in attempting to control male sexual behavior”

Why did he choose Christian?

Acceptable races are South American, Persian, Armenian, and European (non-Northern).”

I can hear 8chan fire up the gas chambers on that line.

As if “I’m not white. Why should I care about the future of white societies?” wasn’t bad enough.

He talks about subversion and outsiders ruining any open system. So will he try and get in with the TradCons?

At this point I’ll stop feeding the troll PR unless something major happens.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/02/19/some-manospherians-throw-rattle-from-pram-the-alt-right-is-run-by-cucks-now/

I knew this was coming.

Note the ressentiment of ‘it’s secretly the women and their Lilith magic!’ as if adult men aren’t responsible for their own opinions, much like Roosh isn’t responsible for his words coming back to bite him on the a-and I digress.

He wanted his face on it.

They all have the same line. I did that but it isn’t Me anymore. I turned my back on it, accept me. Sure, like a porn star marrying once her career is over. Your Trojan Horse has failed, deal. He finished by saying the phrase ‘rape hysteria’ and playing Damsel because all this attention is apparently a threat to them and their social circle. R-types.

Let’s see if this modest (and holding back) post is taken with the humility we typically expect of this lot.

reading:

https://lookism.net/showthread.php?tid=443231

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Roosh_V

Pharisees of the peen.

Roosh V takes the “God Pill,” embracing Jesus after getting super high on shrooms. No, really

Current year, highlight reel.

Men who visit hookers are a huge disease risk

https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2019/01/06/anti-gay-pastor-fired-prostitutes/
But they think THEIR degeneracy is normal.

I love especially how he criticizes homosexuals when you know he’s probably the anal guy.

Literally the same behaviour, same disease risk.

If you practice sodomy, you are a sodomite.

This is not hard to understand.

The sodomy problem is only half gay.

It’s also half straight.

Why scapegoat? It won’t lower your disease risk.

You’re not morally superior to sodomites if you ARE ONE.

These guys don’t realize nobody is impressed, they’re actually disgusted. That’s what you do if you’re desperate in prison, not popular. Porn stars almost always get HIV eventually from it, what a role model.
Plus they’re functionally gay, if not identifying with it.

The delusion is STRONG.

“I can act like one but don’t judge me like one” er no?

Nobody wants to hear about how you love coating your penis in fecal microbes.
Many men don’t wash their hands. We have every right to be disgusted.

Keep that shit to yourself.

Little known fact, mutilated men prefer anal because the circumcision ripped out many of their nerves. No, the sensation isn’t better – that’s how intact men feel normally. Men circumcised as adults are horrified in studies at what it does to their sexual pleasure, that’s why they don’t wait to perform the surgery – no sane man would want it!
Update: I posted about this fact here since the data wasn’t posted here before:
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/01/07/circumcision-risky-behaviours-studies/

Porn is trying to kill you. The saliva thing makes it worse.
http://www.publichealth.pitt.edu/Portals/0/IDM/MPH%20JC%20Articles/Saliva%20and%20Gonorrhea.pdf?ver=2016-04-11-084337-140
http://www.catie.ca/en/pif/fall-2014/getting-bottom-it-anal-sex-rectal-fluid-and-hiv-transmission
Trannies are a health risk because of anal. Nothing else.
https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1108
Women are now catching HIV like men – thanks to anal propaganda in porn.

Click to access EF08L44.pdf

Act like a gay guy, catch the same diseases.

Because bisexuals exist – guess which orifice they prefer?

Narcissistic male views marriage as status symbol

And a cover. It is less a yoke and more a ball and chain because they expect to take, take take and never give (even their gender role) unless they expect more in return – so not a union, more like running a business.

Good marriages aren’t a scoreboard.

Being married isn’t an achievement, you signed your name. It isn’t a status to hit others with like a rhetorical weapon. A good marriage is an achievement but I guarantee the married men bitching about single women don’t have one of those. Shouldn’t you be with your family than wasting time online? It’s un-Biblical, they’re bad husbands. They cherish every woman BUT their wife. (And they deny their body belongs to their wife).

The Madonna/Whore complex means they are emotionally impotent with their own wife. They hate her because she is his wife. (Because they hate themselves, thus resent her for loving him).

They don’t have empathy, they can’t love (even themselves). They can only imitate and parody i.e. seduction, “romance” cliches, while acting out of sync behind the mark’s back (lying, confabulated memory, cheating). It’s ALL superficial so they intend to lovebomb, mirror (to seem like a soulmate) and trick “good” women into the trap of legal union (personality disorders do this all the time, usually the mask doesn’t slip until after the wedding so long courtship had the old role of filtering them out). The prey can’t escape.

There is usually gaslighting during courtship into codependency (or deeper from an already codependent woman) so he uses the woman for supply before the marriage but she views it as emotional intimacy (wrong*), taking advantage of the novelty of the situation and fact she hasn’t seen all his sides (not informed consent). They don’t even know how bitter he is until after marriage, typically (because he is running off her supply so it doesn’t come out). These are later the divorced guys who act like innocent maidens attacked by the dragon of divorce and warn all men off marriage because they personally sucked at it. (Husband is a job so they devalue it once it turns out to be, you know, WORK).

Psychopaths are best known for doing that bait and trap thing with marriage, we need strict legal protections from such people (men and women both) and psychopaths are the most pathological narcissist.

There are plenty of good videos on that channel, including ones about women and traits the narcissist seeks to take for themselves via relationships, as an emotional vampire.

Oh, and they always cheat in marriage. They claim all men are similarly weak or “unhappy” because they don’t like other men either, thinking of other men as happy, faithful or good husbands would kill them on the inside.

So when no-fault divorce is over, they’ll be screwed twice!

Marriages require both parties to have emotional maturity (cooperation, compromise) so any union with a narcissist in it is doomed, even if the other party is a literal Saint. Naturally, it’s never their fault, like any incompetent person so they get married again and again and make the same “mistakes” again and again but there’s no agency involved apparently.

They were innocent victims of the vagina, as they purchased a ring and got down on one knee and said things they didn’t mean and spent months planning and turned up to say some lines and where, oh, where, did they go wrong?

They’re never wrong, according to them. Despite how their life is always a mess.

They’ll claim men are leaders in a marriage but resent the business of actually leading.

This is the guy who’ll claim to be traditional but hates religion and has a long, long line of “exes” you’re not “allowed” to “judge”. They’re such hypocrites they’re a walking joke.

*Emotional labour is real and doing too much of it (for two whole people) can kill a woman (stress x disease risk) or, rarely, a man. Commonly, a man is killed by stress at work (physical labour) but a woman’s lifespan is shortened by stress at home (emotional labour) so who a woman marries can literally be life or death, it can be the difference of a happy life and extra decades. Women need this information.

I’d bet good money that Type A men have an unhappy marriage and the woman has a similar disease risk profile. A married man’s primary responsibility is to his wife and until society pushes this point hard, men won’t try. They’ll ignore the marriage for career, friends, addiction (workaholism is the socially desirable addiction though). If the man won’t Be the Man, nothing the woman does will succeed. Men shirk their duties, abandon the home (literally or spiritually) and what can a woman do about that? Force him? No! Then she’s being the man!

And random but when society values women’s happiness and feminine energy levels over her contribution to GDP, we’ll be nicer overall. EVERYBODY WINS.

I’ve seen feminine women mocked by other women (envy) and torn down by men (who knows it’s easier to bed a High T harridan). Pick your poison, guys. Either you want women to earn their keep and be a whore in your bedroom or you want a docile purer kind and shun the former. You can’t expect mutual exclusives, it’s impossible. And you have to be worthy of the woman you want or it won’t last.

Funny example

One guy I spoke to said he liked “traditional women” but he also filtered FOR a “career woman”.

His words. He thought this was clever. He wanted the status of her “achievements”, you see.

When pressed (and I was pressed myself at the ignorance), he said he expected a woman to have a “good” (secure) job (be locked in), and have “at least” a middle-class salary. I just told him he sounded like a woman… from the 50s.

He literally did, I swear, there were other details that sealed it e.g. sexual experience. Why would any sane man want a wife who’s had more fun with other men?

He insisted there was no contradiction or way this could possibly backfire on him. That, my friends, is the idiot in action. When I pointed out those are impossible values systems, polar opposites, he claimed a traditional woman would be “bad in bed” (like you can’t teach them?) and “lazy” for not wanting an office job. The feminist propaganda has sunk into men the deepest.

They feel entitled to seek their male qualities in their wife.

That’s dysfunctional and you can’t convince me otherwise.

How lazy! What, is he going to take on the female role and give birth?

He only claimed to want trad because it’s the current status symbol, because he likes the idea of it and the supply it might give him. He married an SJW. She cooks sometimes and “lets him” tradlarp. He’s a moron. The woman who is cautious is feminine, there’s no rush – the woman desperate for a husband, any husband, is using you.

I have betting odds on his divorce. Easy money.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/07/16/why-wont-women-be-right-wing/

As it is, hypersexualised porno society has made women very masculine, higher T. They also need it to defend themselves in a low trust, multiculti society and that, naturally, never gets a mention. Unsafe society = everyone gets more aggressive. Sort out the former and the latter reverts.

We’re cultural refugees, in a way. Pining for a world that doesn’t exist.

We live in the dishonour culture, where people who act like whores aren’t ashamed of it, they’re proud. With freedom of association, we could avoid these people (m/f).

Not every man who wants to get married would be a good husband. Sometimes they want a slave to abuse but in the Bible such treatment (like property, like using a machine or a PA, housekeeper) instead of the equal yoke, to love and to cherish, was grounds for divorce. So nope, they can’t hide behind religion…. unless we can stone them for adultery (lawsuits were less bloody).

Trad test: what should be the punishment for adultery?

Trads know adultery is a crime. To “commit” adultery demands punishment.

Good men versus porn addict liars

Prime example why women need social protection.

Christians need to talk about this or our own group is a sitting, gullible duck.

Lies have legal consequences.
http://www.lovewhatmatters.com/im-that-girl-that-spent-6-months-with-a-ring-on-her-finger-that-girl-that-planned-an-entire-wedding-only-to-find-out-a-week-prior-it-was-all-a-lie/

A few obvious points, obvious to fellow K-types.

Never marry an addict.
Porn is cheating.  (see Bible)
Porn destroys marriages. (because adultery is the thrill)

“The coldest thing I’ve ever witnessed in my entire life is the lying eyes of the man I love, gazing deep into my soul as multiple lies rolled from his lips. He knew it was all a lie, but for some reason, he could look at the woman he claimed to love so dearly straight in her eyes, and lie to her face. I never knew until that moment how unconsciously cold a single person could be.”

A liar for years? Congratulations, you avoided a miserable marriage to a filthy narcissist. Being married to one of those (m/f) can make you wish you were dead, if you read countless online accounts, so God was protecting you from that.

To lie multiple times (and every day) plus once caught? Narc.
Possibly psychopath, since he only seemed to value her as a status object (wife).

Good women can still be treated like dirt by burned out r-types pretending to be traditional to cash out and “have it all” (but once the novelty has worn off, they cheat and get divorced anyway, they just wanted the status – women can do it too). Women have a right to know and avoid bad marriage prospects. (As do good men from bad women).

betrayal trauma occurs when someone we depend on for survival or are significantly attached to, violates our trust in a critical way.”

A divorce would be Christian in this case, if they had married because 1. he was depicting himself in “false light”, she didn’t know who she was marrying. Plus the abuse psychologically from the cheating (2, betrayal trauma) and the addiction itself (3, which causes brain damage).

He portrayed himself as a good, honest man to trick her into legal wedlock.

Good honest women need to be protected from this type. She was true.

He didn’t even know what love is!

Makeup you can wash off. Lies void contracts. His narc mirroring caused her emotional bond, she never really fell for him because there is no him. There’s nothing in there! No person!

Narcs prefer to bond with empaths so good women must be especially vigilant. They assume you’ll be like a replacement mother figure and never leave them, you see. There’s logic. Whatever abuse, a mother’s love is eternal.

You can’t have a good marriage and Christian life + children with an r-type.

They are never satisfied in ANY marriage, it’s the nature of personality disease!

If they could change, they’d have done it before you met or they’d be prudent enough to never get an addiction in the first place.

Narcissists run the Bird with a Broken Wing routine, don’t fall for it.

Send them to a shrink, don’t play Mommy! Your husband is supposed to be the one caring for YOU.

Professionals have to train and gain the ability to prescribe serious meds for this! You can’t talk it out!

The level of psychopathic disdain to lie to her and plan this deception over years…. likely psychopath.

I bet he randomly showed up at a church to go wife-hunting (yes, hunting) because a PUA forum told him to. AVOID the crazy. Peeple was a good idea – as a courtship app. It replicates an honour culture, where reputation is well known.

Imagine hiring a business partner and finding out they have a criminal record. Like that only a very intimate betrayal. Possibly rape by fraud. Possibly. Note her disgust at the mask drop. Solid K response.

Psychopaths’ MO is to hide who they really are (for years) until AFTER the marriage. So you can’t run.

All other mental illness typically presents before a wedding so a psycho is literally every man/woman’s worst nightmare as a fiance/e.

Get a background check. If they get defensive, immediately break it off.

False light on wikipedia doesn’t discuss marital fraud anymore (bring it back, Trump!) but there are others.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misrepresentation

misrepresentation is an untrue or misleading[1] statement of fact made during negotiations by one party to another, the statement then inducing that other party into the contract.[2][3]

Marriage is a contract.

Legally binding.

The misled party may normally rescind the contract, and sometimes may be awarded damages as well (or instead of rescission).

https://info.legalzoom.com/meant-fraud-grounds-divorce-24925.html

Fraud
The definition of fraud in the context of divorce law varies between states. Generally, it means that one spouse grossly misrepresented issues so important that the other spouse would not have married him had she known the truth. For example, when a husband tells his wife before they married that he had never been married before and she discovers after the marriage that he was lying. His lie about his previous marriage may be considered fraud, especially if the wife can show that she would not have married him had she known this was his second marriage. Little white lies usually do not constitute fraud.”

Precisely. Christian expectations for a Christian marriage. It’s very simple.

Lies have legal consequences, degenerates.

Marriage is all about who/what you are. You lie about that, clear-cut case of fraud. K-types deserve legal protection. R-types shouldn’t care because they don’t want to marry!

Do we have to get them to sign a legal disclaimer that they haven’t falsely represented themselves?

Isn’t the marriage contract enough?

You’re late

http://www.unz.com/akarlin/the-rights-human-capital-problem/

I was discussing the Signalling Right and fake Ks years ago.

The rightist Swine is a nominally conservative type who is openly promoting traditional values such as God, homeland and family but in reality he’s a treacherous calculated Machiavellian type of low moral virtue, high time preference and low loyalty.

Fake Ks playing both sides. Won’t work.

You can’t “Have it All.”

The same way a leftist activist is constantly talking about the oppressed proletariat and while raising his own political power and enriching himself with other people’s money, the Swine of the Right is constantly talking about the virtue

There’s your problem.
No moral authority.

I’ve said this.

of raising a family, the depth of his faith and the love of his homeland, and at the same time using every possible opportunity to raise his political power and wealth in the most corrupt and criminal way possible, regardless of the consequence to the things he nominally holds dear. The Swine usually has very little manners, and behaves like a brute

Know them by their fruit blah blah blah yada yada.

You know this point. I won’t repeat this point.

despite of his education. In short, The Swine is a swindler and a charlatan who successfully uses right wing rhetoric

Con artist.

Like a tithe for political signalling.

Signal with YOUR LIFE.

Live it or GTFO.

I’m tired of tradlarp men who are like marriage and kids for thee but not for me. Slutting is evil unless I’m doing it. We need strong fighting men but the draft is mean.

Or the worst, fence-sitting: I’m a social liberal, economic conversative. trans. Everyone must like me! Please like me!

That is a cuck. Selfish individualists.

Impossible too. You want a huge national debt then? How else pay for the liberalism? It’s a black hole.

Libertarians who want to shackle others with the free shit they believe should exist. The liberal picking someone else’s pockets and calling it charity.

It isn’t charity with someone else’s money.

Craven pricks.

to expand his wealth and political power. In a way, he is either a communist apparatchik who successfully replaced the hammer and a sickle with the cross or the village brute who finds it very convenient to sit in the first row on a Sunday mass.

They think traditionalism = hating women and using them like slaves.
They are that bestial. And ignorant of history. Like divorce was invented in the 1960s? Like cheating on a spouse is normal or Biblical? Like women are large children instead of ..women? Like they don’t make an effort in the homemaking thing? Like love matches don’t have rules? Like fornication is okay? Like alcoholism is necessary? Like courtship is for suckers? They assume the shallow 20th century lies about how these things worked.

It’s like the porn star pretending to be Born-Again Christian (there is no such thing as Born-Again, anything, that’s prideful) once her career tanks.

You can’t cash out with a clean slate.

God can see.

comment: Conservatives offered realism and a sense of human limits to the Lefts quest for perfection. They misunderstood Tradition – which is about the quest for perfection just as much as Leftism is. Had the Right offered its own version of the quest for perfection, it might have stood a chance.

They think we’ll be so weak as to forgive them like it’s a human thing. Worse, treat them as superior for having the “experience” of deliberate evil. No, Russell Brand. Your status here is worm. Earn your keep quietly for decades before lecturing the faithful. We are not grateful you’re here, we existed before. You can’t fake this.

They’re holier than thou atheists. It’s creepy. We don’t need their input.

They have no character and we can’t treat dishonorable people otherwise.

We refuse to treat the local slut like a monk. Fuck off.

The only light you’ve seen is on an ATM. We won’t corrupt ourselves and shelter you.

But progressivism is the terror

It destroys the world and kills every culture it touches.

It drags down the highest tech societies.

Materialism + Hedonism + Equalism* = Progressivism.

*”Liberal Creationism”

http://www.henrydampier.com/2016/07/terrorism-creates-jobs/

Survival instinct is the worst signal to them, that you don’t self-hate, that you want to preserve something good, that you don’t want to go down with the poorly constructed ship.

We have lemmings, laughing as they jump off a cliff.

The muddled view of Westerners has been to decide to aggressively evangelize the world to adhere to the progressive faith….

Perhaps the more significant (and even darkly amusing) issue is that slave raids are now common enough in England that the government bothered to produce a report about it which claimed that the practice was pervasive throughout Northern Europe. It’s not so much that Westerners can’t be roused to action on behalf of foreigners in distant lands — they can’t even be roused to battle in defense of local girls.

To even begin to attempt to rouse people against it is to provoke the wrath of the authorities.

Low in philia.

There is no state charity because it’s compulsory. Charity had no problems when it was voluntary and Church-run (philia institution). The Government is low in philia because a dollar is a dollar is a dollar. The whip-hand goes to those who pay them.

This country was gun-stripped under dodgy pretense but the wedding next month is getting weapons protection.

Why?

If we’re so equal?

Why do some people get the right to self-defense?

If foreigners don’t realize that they really want to be progressives deep-down, if we spend enough money on foreign aid, capitulate to shakedowns from foreign powers, and show an unwillingness to use nuclear weapons, they will eventually learn to become more progressive.

r-brain.gif

Collectivism is genetic. They have already “utterly failed” – Merkel.

Malaria medications et al. for signalling savior white people really fucked over our age-old strategy of getting rid of them – send them abroad on “missions” and they won’t come back. At least machete attacks are up.

One way to convert more people to the progressive cause, it’s thought, is to respond to provocations with greater and ever-more-insistent demands to be tolerant

No, you don’t know these people. I do.

I go to their parties, their charities, their galas, their vacations, their funerals, their many, many weddings, their dinners and their common meetings and meeting places.

They aren’t throwing up the white flag AT ALL.

The message is clear: take the other white people and leave us alone!

So they are. Have been for decades. They do. For now. They’ll allow the betrayal as long as their own kind are spared. They are selfish, greedy cowards. That’s all.

This is being challenged by numbers. Hence slight push back. Toothless, still. People scared of unwashed kale. You should hear some of the shit they tell me. Fairies, crystal alignments, any superstition to replace religion.

Everyone else – The Lion.

The poor people are the scapegoat, the sacrificial offering. They all blamed for all sin. This toughens them.

They assume they, enlightened Saints, will always be spared.

Hollywood will always be sick until white leading men are a thing of the past.

“Dey took our jobs!” say the rednecks in South Park. Keep laughing, let’s cut off California’s water supply.

It’ll happen.

Already, they can’t pay their bills because Hollywood refuses to pay its “fair share” of taxes.

https://www.theperspective.com/debates/entertainment/hollywood-too-white/

We’ll see how funny it is when Lawrence is on the street as a syphilitic crack whore.

[she does not currently have syphilis, to my knowledge but it is on the rise]

Notice less signalling white men since the non-whites have started asserting themselves?
They grow bolder every day, turnin’ everyone a K.

With hardly any white people to prop them up, the social justice movements are dying.

If only we had a metric for this.

Spot the Coincidence

Joan Rivers knew about Lawrence and Weinstein then Rivers ends up mysteriously dying on an operating table. Uhuh. Then most of Harvey’s girls’ pics get leaked, all their blackmail and only their blackmail material, blamed on “hackers” (read: Anonymous, who doesn’t care about famous tits), after a rumour they’re gonna take him down circulates.

I don’t like internet people getting blamed for the degeneracy of normalfags.

I don’t like it one bit.

When is Assbender getting divorced from that dog?

But not all the yacht girls: Winslet, Hayek and co are safe. For the time being.

Personally, I want to see Blowjobs Rosie go down.

Geffen, Spielberg, many creeps walk free. They make money.

Sweet, sweet, tax-free pedo change.

In other news, Dale Winton, gay Trump admirer, turns up dead.

Socialists, the small-time dishonest

Oh, you might try to pretend this video doesn’t apply to you.

Like you’re too good to need a boost.

It applies to everyone, don’t lie.

Oh, but you might say, this has nothing to do with the half-way slide from socialism to Communism, which killed hundreds of millions of people.

Well, aside from missing the point, they have studied it.

http://reason.com/blog/2014/07/22/socialists-are-cheaters-says-new-study

An ideology pushed by rationalizing thieves, which produces more of the same.

Until, eventually, the bandwagon effect means the whole system collapses.

All producers become parasites.

Communism and socialism are great ways of burning up resources.

Problem is, you can’t stop it. Don’t blame the hedonic treadmill, it’s rentseeking group competition. It’s a thieve’s arms race. One group gets X, your group needs, nay, DEMANDS, X+1. Because the resources are still finite so you not only have no choice (WORKERS’ FREEDUMB!) but to participate but you must also be aggressive (immoral).

Communism kills jobs via the security of the labour itself (no trade unions if there’s no boss to depend on) and the fruit (income, savings).

Why so many champagne socialists?

Well, they believe the workers are too dumb to take advantage or they could outcompete. An argument to IQ.

This would be correct if numbers were not worth more in such a system.

You have one man stealing 1 million from the workers.

You have a thousand men stealing a thousand. Which represents the greater problem in society?

Sure, both. But one caused another, didn’t it? Eventually it’s dog eat dog, every man for himself and his family. This sounds like capitalism but too corrupt to have true signals. There is no full rebound. I wonder how that feels…

What about the quality of people involved in this?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5520657/Troubled-kids-likely-favour-radical-socialist-policies-adults.html

Mentally maladapted for the world, they cannot honestly compete.
So far, so r-select.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/05/least_surprising_academic_study_of_2017_physically_weak_men_tend_to_be_socialists.html

Yep.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/tories-attractive-socialists-conservatives-labour-study-wealthy-good-looking-a8186836.html

TOLD YA SO.