The Left can’t meme, holy shit.
It’s like a goth phase for degenerates.
He’s the dumb person’s smart person.
And the best meme is obviously this:
Show me IQ by sexual partners or STD history, Peterson.
How to spot a cult, this line:
“There are those on the inside who “get it” and those on the outside who don’t.”
The modern navel-gazer picks over Disney instead of the Bible.
“In his Maps of Meaning course he spends over 4 hours deconstructing the movie Pinocchio,”
digging a latrine for four hours would be more useful
these people are allergic to manual tasks
they’d watch paint dry than do something with their hands
why doesn’t he teach you how to read research papers?
so you don’t have to rely on anyone’s interpretation?
(he doesn’t think you’re smart enough – and he’s right)
“drawing from the cartoon profound insights about religion, myth, society, Marxism, psychology, and religion.”
Marxism, yay! Theft is so deep.
If you want to torture me, set me up Clockwork Orange style in front of someone pontificating about Disney for hours like it’s the Holy Grail.
This is what the SJWs did first. If you twist things for kids, you can brainwash them. It’s the lowest effort manipulation.
Remember when the edgy people used to hate psychology professors?
The field isn’t different. They still hate you.
I’ve written about the distraction on menial work before, typical cult.
Clean up your room?
Clean up your country.
Jesus didn’t tidy a hut.
“You stop doing things that make you feel weak and aim for making your life better.”
REAL SELF-IMPROVEMENT MAKES YOU FEEL LIKE SHIT.
It doesn’t stop.
The funny part of a cult is how the members have total cognitive dissonance, demonstrated in zero self-awareness.
They couldn’t have wasted months watching shit on the internet (I know I do!), no, it has to be life-changing.
If it were true, the signal value would be bad.
Logically, it must be partially false to pass the censors.
Spiritual bypassing again. Addicted to superficial “improvement”. No use repainting the wall when the building is about to collapse.
Look at the simple conflict of “stay out of the mainstream, you’re so special just the way you are” against “Climb the dominance hierarchy”.
What if the system is corrupt? Why support it?
Ah, academic professor, that’s why. Teenagers will hate their parents, never their favourite teachers. And you wonder why so many abandoned kids are socialists. They never replace the teachers with robots for this reason, the real reason. They teach state loyalty with emotional abuse (since teachers are instrumental supports designed to induce obedience in the helpless and always leave).
The people you see on TV (Channel 4 interview) or at the top of Youtube are finger puppets.
The internet is one big Punch and Judy show.
The alt right collapsed when the drama!!!!!1! people came in and started trying to be celebrities constantly cat-fighting one another for attention supply and doing nothing productive. Actively halting productive conversations with gossip.
It’s just as bad as the Kardashian brothel.
However, this was gold. You can allow 1% lolz. It can’t be 99% what you do.
“In order to be able to think, you have to risk being offensive.”
Liars can use common sense, Satan can quote Scripture, Peterson can sound lucid for once.
He’s using the Rules for Radicals technique there, I think. Hoist them by their own petard, hold them to their own standard. SJWs offend everyone so are they also banned? We now have political classes … we notice because they’re in flux. Christians, white people and capitalists (right-wingers) used to be on the bottom of the heap and rise. The left, atheist crowd object to the change in status but can only make noise, having no logical grounding to prevent their slide down.
The end of that video is what I just described, she slides silently down, virtue signalling corrupted.
He didn’t say the best thing: the right to liberty involves risk. If someone disgusts you, you have the right to avoid them. Freedom of association keeps the peace. Emotional appeals have no logical or legal basis. Everyone has emotions. The truth will be the truth no matter what you or I feel about it, bring up Creationists and evolution. Denial has no right to be respected when an individual tries to force society to ignore evidence in biology. It’s ideological fascism.
You cannot outlaw risk, it’s a fact of reality and there is no such thing as a right to be coddled by others. Infantilization is wrong. Entitlement is toxic. Outrage begins within and it is abusive to ask others to regulate your own emotions when you choose to seek out ideas that anger you. It’s an anger management problem.
This is why they don’t let me on TV.
The Virgin/Chad thing was a cringe attempt of middle-class, spoiled American degenerates to pretend they have a conscience e.g. “saves Western civilization”, it actually says that. Next to “centrist” (cuck) and “Disney”. Just “Disney”. The left can’t meme, even when they’re pretending to be right e.g. “speaks the truth” is one “Chad” description. Find the average business major Chad at a festival and see how much shit they talk. They still listen to rap, FFS.
The male equivalent of an SJW. Both are addicted to vice, an irrational sense of superiority from being degenerate, combined with intense emotions and without those intense emotions like a strong tap they collapse from withdrawal. Both are drama addicts.
These people are useless narcissists: http://highexistence.com/dark-side-of-following-your-dreams/
Both are movement poison, waiting for a powerful bandwagon to jump on.
A cuck will collapse (no conscience, nothing behind the verbal) and abandon your team as soon as you call them racist. Racist just means white person.
You can’t stop being white? It’s the white person’s “nigger”. Pets used to be called that with love, it had a variety of meanings. They’re so sheltered they don’t get that a word becomes its use and “racist” was a Marxist invention anyway; words can describe all sorts of things that don’t exist, you bloody unicorn. You don’t have to respect a thing because they made up a word for it, it’s linguistic intelligent design.
(If ID were true, genetic mutations wouldn’t exist, nor would genetic disease).
Denial doesn’t work. Reality exists!
The scientific use of it is a false flag to deplete attention away from the science per se.
The science is still there. DNA is on our side on this one. The word is in the long slow process of dying out among the ignorant who don’t believe in the science.
“Define who you are” – Peterson
oh but nationalism is bad?
Are you not your culture, Mr Myth Man?
Are you African culture too, with your globalism? Who’s your fave Orisha, Peterson? Or does he only study White culture? I’d like a comparison of Yemoja to Luna. Probability = 0.
(As you can guess, I could write a religion book better than Peterson and trust me, that isn’t saying much.. He doesn’t even mention The White Goddess book, haven’t seen it. It explains women in wheat fields as ancestral memory, imho. His view is narrow Greco-Roman Martian sensibility. Within the same pantheon and ignorance, at least appreciate Jupiter and Saturn!)
His lectures plot the same course of intellectual development for female students as male, that is a Gender Studies major’s wet dream.
And are you not beholden to your biology? Then you begin with huge limits e.g. IQ and true self-definition is a farce involving the long-dead American Nightmare.
“Strengthen the individual.” Fucking psychologists.
(They make more money treating 5,000 people for the same problem than telling them all at once and solving it forever. Remember that.)
I think, I drink, I judge.
If you’re new, welcome.
And if the given rationale for that particular mantra is to spare society the responsibility for individuals, that is the express purpose of authority (and taxation) and individualism is the enemy of nationalism. The basis of his brand of individualism cannot be nationalism (improving strength and potency of national symbols and culture). If it’s for the Greater Good of nation then why be opposed to nationalism, why not just skip to that bit?
Save the nation, save all the individuals comprising it.
Any rebuttal? Anyone? If we’re shooting for pure utilitarianism… don’t be easy pickings.
The envious mob can chop up Hypatia. One great individual has no strength in a weak society that doesn’t deserve them.
It’s a myth of mere genius e.g. Galileo, that they cannot be murdered. A fairytale.
Fix the nation, correct the incentives or the tall poppies die and everyone else with them. Throughout history, they pluck off the “individuals” first. Divide and conquer.
What takes out your polymaths and geniuses will easily devastate the common herd.
You can have the tidiest room up to operating room standards and there are still invaders raping your little sister. Are you really a man?
They seek out myth because their life is a lie.
They seek out old culture in a grandiose pastiche because they are disconnected socially from the present and recent past (kin) and want the emotional boost of belonging like a drug without the duties to the in-group. His lectures go over well with kids because they’re dodging responsibility. It’s escapism.
They say they want “meaning”, they crave belonging.
You miss your unique place that is your birthright.
I know this because I’ve been there, the same position as you fifteen years ago.
Don’t waste fifteen years reading myths thinking they hold a key to Atlantis.
To put it in terms a Peterson cultist would understand, meditate on this:
You’re still alienated, surrounded by Disney VHS tapes.
It doesn’t have to be this way.