Jordan reminds me of Jordan

http://dexter.wikia.com/wiki/Jordan_Chase

The similarities are uncanny.

There is truth because there is no truth because there might be truth. WELL. I’m convinced!

Truth – what I believe
No truth – beyond me (solipsism, false*)
Might be truth – appeal to evidence* (perceptual bias)

Floppy beliefs, very difficult. He’s taken men’s ability to rationalize and weaponized it against them. Evidence is objective, beyond the self, you can’t deny things you dislike. Appeal to confirmation bias.*

There is no truth – paradoxical statement.

All attempted replacements to Christianity will fall prey to entropy eventually.

I don’t trust people who promise material deliverance without remorse.

It’s Fight Club rhetoric telling men they’re supposed to act like dogs. Antisocial shit.

Metaphor metaphor metaphor rebellion.

The metaphors are the lube.

When I saw people refer to a JP years ago, I thought they were referring to the satirical “guru”.

(awaken with JP)

This is how a psychopath feels, having no inner self (soul).

They see themselves as normal. There’s no conscience to correct the feeling. The narcissism makes them feel like they’re the true ideal, rather.

based on http://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2018/05/it-was-right-there-all-along.html#c5930918308717031439

I could be wrong.

A lot of psychologists are sociopathic, maybe not the full-blown thing but …traits. They enjoy the control over people’s minds. It’s like CEO positions select for arrogance. You can get them to admit this if you play your cards right.

Psychologists never study themselves.

Think on that.

Ruin

“In our time all Greece was visited by a dearth of children and generally a decay of population, owing to which the cities were denuded of inhabitants, and a failure of productiveness resulted, though there were no long-continued wars or serious pestilences among us…. For this evil grew upon us rapidly, and without attracting attention, by our men becoming perverted to a passion for show and money and the pleasures of an idle life, and accordingly either not marrying at all, or, if they did marry, refusing to rear the children that were born, or at most one or two out of a great number, for the sake of leaving them well off or bringing them up in extravagant luxury.”
-Polybius, Greek Historian

Anime was punishment for Hiroshima. We killed their city, they killed our birth rates.

When the men become weak and decadent with their pleasures, society falls.
Patriarchy keeps the men in line, to be men.

What is Solipsistic?

solisistic

Technically, all those men slinging this term exclusively at women while being mistrustful Look Out For #1 types are being hypocrites. Classically, men are the more selfish sex. A self-interested man is quite literally an idiot.

Book source: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=YZ8Pza5f0-QC&source=gbs_navlinks_s

Storied Words: The Writer’s Vocabulary and Its Origins by Jeske

Why does the manosphere think it has the moral high ground?

It doesn’t. At all. In fact, it’s actually worse than feminism in some respects because they know full well how wrong what they encourage and do really is, they see the damage to society and keep doing it because other people are (begging if they jumped off a cliff…). They seem to be dallying with the Alt Right since this EU crisis (whatever) and some dipping their toe into Neoreaction (fine) ideas and acting shocked and pearl-clutching like the worst SJWs when these traditional people reject them. Like, actually traditional, as in living it. Or in politer circles, when they ignore them, hoping they’ll go away.

They don’t get it.
They don’t have the moral high ground.

I have a mixed readership so allow me to explain a bit.

Off the top of my head, like Feminist vs. PUA … let’s consider the so-called ‘degenerate’ behaviours they verbally lambaste when (feminist) women do it while hypocritically enacting them or endorsing them in their common conversations with others who are/will do them aka incitement. (Looks misogynist to an outsider because it is, in some cases, like how dare a single woman support herself with a job – when the alternative is welfare).
I’ve gone for the practical, somewhat PC term destructive because it’s easier to agree upon.

fuckingdegenerates

None of those people with the spare time to push these Zeitgeist online have a real job or an actual life. Their Apocalypse Value is zero. They deserve zero respect. AKA r-types gonna r.

And they wonder why the traditional people are giving them the side-eye.

Really?

She sLAYS them

It comes from a puerile understanding of masculinity, including the laughable attempt to ape Neoreaction’s success with ‘Neomasculinity’, where r-types pretend to reform and play both sides (I guess you could say, game both sides) by talking about K-ideas, what an effort... and bitch “Why won’t women (who aren’t married to me and owe me nothing) submit to me?” when they’ve done literally nothing to prepare for that role and on the contrary, much to disqualify them from the MMP.
As if anyone in their Right mind (pun wholly intended) is going to take pointers on how to be a man from Roosh. Do you want his life? Is it aspirational for traditionalists up until now? What’s your gut telling you? A person’s past and choices can’t lie for them.

Their troubles seem to come from a very convenient excuse to avoid maturity.

Men aren’t exempt from prosocial behaviour, far from it, they’re supposed to be more virtuous to lead women and establish societal standards.

p.s. I see the spelling error and I don’t care.