Statists want taxpayer-funded pussy

It finally happened.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Incels/comments/4rlc3x/the_only_way_i_could_ever_get_a_wife_or/

I’ve seen people mention (uncabob? I think?) that all this sexual entitlement is essentially calling for AA for supposed ‘incels’ and they’re finally just admitting that ‘game’ is a marketing gimmick cum Ponzi where they circlejerk e-books that don’t attract a wife, at the very least, which is the only way to make sexual entitlement a legitimate thing.

via The Kids Are Alt Right VI

Previous generations of men would be ashamed at this desperation.

‘Incel’ is normal for the unmarried and …not a sin.

Fornication, prostitution, adultery – all sins.
This is why, it makes for weak men.

“My problems are society’s problems” I bet he calls women solipsistic narcissists or something. Men won’t be widely respected again until they whip this trash into line.
Only one group has the right to have ALL its ‘needs’ met – babies. Babies can’t consent.

<obligatory Brave New World reference>

Everyone belongs to everyone else. – rapists everywhere

I bet they’d still reserve the ‘right’ to reject 1-3s.

It seems, like the ‘refugees’, beggars can indeed be choosers.
When society has gone insane.

Sexual immorality in the Bible

Just a reminder for the PUAs lurking. You are not traditional and certainly not Christian. You’re not even cucks, you’re not right-wing at all, let alone Alt Right.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Corinthians+6&version=NIV

Sexual Immorality

12 “I have the right to do anything,” you say—but not everything is beneficial. “I have the right to do anything”—but I will not be mastered by anything. 13 You say, “Food for the stomach and the stomach for food, and God will destroy them both.” The body, however, is not meant for sexual immorality but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. 14 By his power God raised the Lord from the dead, and he will raise us also.15 Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ himself? Shall I then take the members of Christ and unite them with a prostitute? Never! 16 Do you not know that he who unites himself with a prostitute is one with her in body? For it is said, “The two will become one flesh.”[b] 17 But whoever is united with the Lord is one with him in spirit.[c]

If degenerate, if r-selected, not right-wing!

18 Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a person commits are outside the body, but whoever sins sexually, sins against their own body. 19 Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God?

You are not your own; 20 you were bought at a price. 

Louder for the fake Bible-thumpers at the back.

Therefore honor God with your bodies.”

No fornication. It’s a hard rule. An absolute.

You don’t get to play Call out the Degenerate, when you are one.

Why contraception is wrong

Brief but a good point.

https://www.tfpstudentaction.org/resources/forgotten-truths/why-contraception-is-wrong-1

I’d add-
Sinning against the body, public health hazard, the psychiatric damage to both parties… ruined for marriage (probably with other people, so not even giving!).

Sex was celebrated in ancient times because it was fertile, not the act itself. Sterile sex isn’t really sex. It shouldn’t be respected or considered as sex. It’s like junk food acting like gourmet. Culture values this because it destroys us. Even the SJWs, handmaidens of decadence acknowledge that sexualisation is bad for everyone.

Within a marriage temporarily is one thing, there can be medical or financial reasons but there’s still conjugal rights to handle. Extramarital, premarital fornication? Abhorrent to anyone who claims to be Christian.

Lock/key is a poor analogy

It doesn’t prove anything.

Except the degeneracy of fornication.

The premise is unintentionally hilarious. What’s the prior here? Logically?

Women are supposed to limit themselves, as if reproduction is a sin (Bible says No) and men can do what they want (Bible says No). Angels fell for fornication. It’s up there with rape. In fact…

If women are supposed to keep their legs shut for their ‘owners’ (husbands), any man who beds a woman and doesn’t marry her is a rapist.

The Bible does imply this too.

It used to be on the law books as things like Breach of Promise. Aka it used to be illegal to defraud/lie to get sex historically too. Rape by fraud would be traditional to reinstate.

She is incapable of consenting except to be wed, in a church, with her previous owner’s (father’s) permission.

They’re implicitly arguing against the Sexual Revolution. A feminist event that allows them to sleep around. Because they defend their ‘right’ to sleep around… (not endogenous, not a right).

Fallacy of Poor analogy.

They’re implicitly saying that all fornication is rape and sex is otherwise stolen from women by criminal men. We’re helpless. As in, we can’t consent to the guy using the metaphor either. It’s an argument to female hypoagency. Also sexist to men, as all rapists and aggressors who only want one thing.

Men sluttier than women

Nobody is ‘lying’ either. Learn to read the research, not the commentary feed from some butthurt bloke. The lie scales are applied to both sexes (independent variables) in a given study. That is how they are constructed, literally. For comparison’s sake aka the study, it holds.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/sexual-health-and-advice/8958520/Average-man-has-9-sexual-partners-in-lifetime-women-have-4.html

Why the discrepancy? you wisely ask.

There are fewer female sluts than male, but they put out a lot more per…. ahem, head.

cute wink

Result? Men gain more ‘experience’, to put it politely.

Now, a little theory…

Remember, this studies frequency of switching. The cause can be traced back via IV to frequency of sex acts too, as the two variables are intertwined (men and women). Otherwise, logically, and sexual congress requiring one male and one female, you would expect even results e.g. men 5, women 5. Men are switching between more women, as you can see from their mean, but they are switching among the same pool of women, necessarily, whereas the total of females is much lower. The average female switches partner less, yes, but what type is the average woman? …

Told you promiscuity, the act, was the problem, and male in face. If you insist on blaming one sex, they’re at the centre of anything sexual, online and off.

If you have data, go ahead and prove me wrong, manwhores.

This is as silly as arguing cuckoldry in the age of DNA testing.

In short, this suggests, pending further results, that men use and use up a lower quality of woman before trading up socially to their final partner. Kinda like a good hand to hold in blackjack. To have and to hold.. They crave the social security like women crave the sexual kind. Hypergamy is a mass neurosis of projection, to anyone who can read.

You don’t see large groups of women on the prowl, versus Pull Nights ( lads on the pull). [SATC is fiction, globally and historically.]

Pool* = sample, arguably the SMP in practice.
Female mean = the total available females in theory, e.g. including the married, the aged, the ill and the celibate.
You see the issue? They’re all lumped together, the data isn’t stratified correctly. Deliberately.
Even a bar chart based on partner count or sexual frequency in a week would be illuminating.
However, the number of count for slutty males must be even higher, because as not-practicing women hold down the slutty average, the number of non-practicing men hold down the manwhore mean too.

dean winchester supernatural evil smirk lol laughing amused

Isn’t science fun?

This accurately traces the perils of lumping the sexes in together, obscuring mating patterns which crossover i.e. promiscuity. Further data computation was required to assess this question.

Obviously none of this data includes rape or other sexual crimes.
Accusing all men of being rapists is exactly as stupid as accusing all women of being whores. They’re both over-reactions designed to defame the opposite sex’s reputation from different sides (take/be taken, force/choose). Instead it cleverly plays on an old question Can a whore be raped?

Nobody mentions this. So I have to.

Sex duration and the sad-sack of PUA wannabes

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/science/how-long-should-sex-last-7693252

Considering the number of porn addicts, I don’t think that sample’s legitimate. Not to mention the way it can weaken the tissue structures e.g. prone position.
Five minutes isn’t really trying, anything less than ten is lazy.

Even the celibate religious used to train their bodies to last much, much longer (and not ejaculate, which isn’t actually the classical goal of masturbation). There are plenty of resources about training your body in this way, and yet these supposed ‘fit’ and ‘healthy’ men refuse to do it.

snort lol laugh haha hmph derision yeah duh really uhuh mhmm princess bride

Because they can’t.

It’s harder than diet and exercise.

It involves real self-control.

And they can’t do it.

come at me bro scarlet pimpernel

You may think I’m being harsh. Not so.

I’ve never spoken to a man (or woman) who learned to control such things, and regretted it.
In every single case, they said something to the effect of “I wish I’d learned this stuff as a teen, seriously.”

Older men weren’t able to last longer than young ones, while wearing a condom or being circumcised didn’t boost chaps’ performance either.

Arteriosclerosis affects one particular area in men….
This is ignoring the probability of nerve damage with age (considering how many so-called men can’t leave the damn thing alone for a while).

“Another surprising finding was that the older the couple, the shorter the sex, contrary to the prevailing wisdom (probably peddled by older men),” Zietsch continued.”

The PUAs lying about older men being better in the sack are lying to themselves…

Speaking of these degenerate try hards.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/meet-britains-biggest-player-who-7850657

He isn’t good-looking, and he’s clearly massaging those numbers. Go on then, what’s the secret?

“The cut-price Casanova also claims one of his hobbies is “upsetting women”.

And they wonder why they repel Wife Material….
And attract fake bimbos….
And eventually die alone and childless….
Evolutionally speaking, a beta with a single child is more of a success.
Not to mention the odds of him having Pelvic Inflammation, that won’t help fertility.

The gym bunny says his father had 12 children with five different women but “doesn’t know” if that has anything to do with the way he treats women.”

laughing rdj crack up

Their parental issues are so predictable it’s becoming a punchline.

R-types, forever fucked up.