Video: It isn’t sexism, it’s evolution

If you hate being a man so much, get a sex change (if you think it’s so easy). [1]

Lindybeige:

“How do you get a man to do a dangerous job?”

“Easy! Tell ’em it’s manly.”

[2]

I’ll spend the rest of my life recovering from that secondhand burn.

1 It’s like the guys who say being a single mother or housewife is easy…. then be the parent at home. You can do that but you won’t because you know you’re lying. Or become a nanny if kids are so easy to take care of “properly” and women exploit the system for easy money. Anything with a lot of time and money you’d be jumping to do and you don’t.

2 Patriarchy manipulates more men than Satan. March off to war and abandon your family for the glories of trenchfoot because Churchill’s banker friends wanted to make more money off your bullet-ridden corpse! Even now “manly” is how America sells its servitude – even to women!

Progress!

The people who’d oppose the title are essentially schizo on evolution, they’re tradlarping: “I’m redpill and there are sex differences but if women don’t act exactly like a man and do their ‘fair share’ [3] they hate men….  [4] except when they outdo men at ‘male things’, those bitches.” They’re borderline cases. They’re hopeless.

They think being traditional is easier than being modern. [5] I’ll wait here while the real trad people laugh at that.

It’s very simple logic e.g.

If women are helpless in a fight (inc. a rapist), they can’t be drafted.

Fact, policy consequence. There’s a specific context and application.

Wanting a taller, stronger male to lift furniture is not sexist, it’s prudence.

And you can always say no.

These guys act like any time a woman asks something they must acquiesce.

No. Grow up. Learn to politely say no.

3 Socialists. Lazy goddamned socialists.

4 A person who hated men wouldn’t care if you knew that fact so…. what? What is this as a train of thought? Projection?

Actual misandrists go on marches and stuff, they’re very open about it. Disagreeing with a man or refusing to put up with his effeminate impossible bullshit is not sexism. It isn’t about your sex, it’s your shitty personality, and if you’re going to blame your entire sex for this, who really hates men?

(it’s projection, said so)

And y u never mention race or class?

Classically, and presently, bigger struggles within the male world.
Ah, but picking on women has no consequences, they’re just cowards.

Nagging turns a woman’s nether regions into the Sahara.
Crying about things is what babies do. Women are not sexually attracted to it.

5 Fake K-types are just too lazy to embrace r-selection so they wanna leech off the juiciest steak of self-sufficient people by throwing around words like Community and Masculinity. Instead of having a family of their own and earning their own keep.

You know, like a real man.

As soon as it gets a little bit difficult, they’ll run away.

That’s why no woman wants them too. They’re dead weights.

Women are the picky sex in this species and any man who complains about this is just further advertising why she was correct.

It sounds like this

Person A: you’re getting fat.

Person B: I can’t believe you just said that! [6] I’m down to fifty Oreos a day!

And if they thought that was actually a good point. They didn’t really listen and understand the interaction.

6 Another tell.

Women deal with problems by talking, a man who cannot listen is worthless.
We don’t mind dealing with normal men with indoor voices, the guy who won’t listen, all bitchy with rationalizations? That’s low IQ and everyone hates dealing with them, it isn’t that they’re men, it’s that they’re annoyingly stupid.

At least other men don’t have to put up with the sexual side of the low IQ men – but women do, and it’s the worst part of them. It’s more obnoxious than all the other parts put together.

Men don’t believe this unless they rarely see it e.g. walking up to a woman and trying to force a conversation when her man is standing right there. We fume too, on the inside. The modern lack of manners hurts men more. Because the stupid ones have no leash.

Women assume any man walking up to them is too stupid to actually hold a conversation, otherwise they’d meet you a normal way (not the ghetto trash method). The worst are when the woman understands his point better than he does i.e. she correctly anticipates a come-on and says she isn’t interested to spare his blushes then he misinterprets this kindness and tries to gaslight her into thinking it wasn’t that (nobody is fooled) and she must be vain (when he walked up to her based on looks).

If no one ever “gets you” become a goth, you’re not complicated, you’re dumb.

India and China must go to war because they killed their women. Don’t do it, America. The lazy guys were genetic dead-ends anyway, don’t listen to them. They want other mens’ lines to die out too with utter chaos and ruin so “if they can’t have it, no one else can”.

It’s sexism to expect women to act like men or vice versa, yes there are exceptions but generally.

Monogamous men disempower bad women because they can’t use their one biochemical psyops weapon – orgasms. SJWs fear good husbands.

So who does Patriarchy fear? The fornicators. They’re weakened physically and compromised in society.

What kind of “Revolution” happened in the 60s? Why? It weakened the men.  They wanted to party and have it all than found a family.

The men who complain about being “manipulated” by women are always sluts, aren’t they? It’s like the gambler who goes to casinos and wonders what happened. It’s almost like people with weak impulse control suffer consequences for it – and society is damaged too.

If they want equality of outcome, well, both sinners should be punished.

Idiots. They got what they wanted and still moan.

Same guys who complain birth rate – as bachelors.

First comes love, then comes _____….. 

Those “men” are quite simply, simple.

The answer was bitchy videos on Youtube about “Western” fertility, obviously. And of course they always fucked (they’re scared of the word “fucked”*) women on the Pill, obviously. [7] “Spermjacking” isn’t really a thing, you donate sperm, that’s a choice. Society is not responsible for where you stick it.

*banged, smashed, screwed, the tells of a Peter Pan manchild

they brag about being really bad in bed with violent metaphor

Patriarchy basically opposes the cult of individualism and the delusion that the damage of hedonism is contained to the person doing it. No, the wastrel abuses their family with their hedonism. They’re a bad son/brother/father/husband.

7 If they knew ANYTHING about the subject, they’d know it’s the economy. Men can’t afford to marry and support a housewife, financially.

Fertility rate is connected to GDP.

Do you see why Trump is so important?

Homework: so when I complain about national debt oppressing us, how many future children do you think it’s murdering?

Men rejecting masculinity

Alt title: men rejecting their gender role (then blaming women).
https://www.mercatornet.com/above/view/apatheism-is-more-damaging-to-christianity-than-atheism-and-antitheism/21642

“More nuanced and incisive rebuttals, such as Edward Feser’s The Last Superstition and David Bentley Hart’s Atheist Delusions, somehow never quite achieved the same recognition.”

cabal

“The questions and debates engaged in by the new atheists were often reductive, emotionalized and glib, but one does have to grant that they at least tackled the great questions of faith in their way.”

All redditfags do is strawman and pretend to be House on social questions while their own lives are miserable bachelorhoods full of porn and video games. It’s like church ladies self-congratulating.

Yeah, in spite of mathematical certainty, they’re all 130+ and can’t spell or compose a sentence for shit. O.K.

The only way they feel good about themselves is crusaderism, finding a “sinner” and making them feel bad or stressed e.g. Christians.

“Its supporters soon tired of tedious and repetitive debates,

with their navel

and they began to argue with each other about social justice and political correctness.”

And failed, clue.

Nothing they say is original. They’re multicultural monstrosities.

“The answer lies in the grey zone between believers and atheists.

no?

If you want to find the real wolf steering sheep away from the flock, look not to fedora-bedecked atheists, but to your average apatheist.”

No, hedonist. They pay lip service to virtue to continue a life of vice, massive cognitive dissonance.
You are not special, broflakes. This is not a special thing worthy of a snowflake term.
e.g. they will say all men should be married, and refuse to get married. Idiots.
They will say all men do better in the military and call the draft “sexist” (like evolution didn’t happen).
Women are weak but should magically overpower any male attacker with kung fu grip (but hitting a man is sexist).
They will know about atheist sub-fertility and refuse to be religious because they think it’s beneath them, a status signal, and again, they’re avoiding patriarchal standards i.e. no manwhoring, no carousing, no drugs, no lechery, actual standards of historical masculine virtue.
They don’t want to grow up or can’t (emotionally regressed). Peter Pan spent all his time “having fun” and dodging responsibility.
The idea of being a gentleman or “respectable” is something they dismiss out of hand with another mis-label, cuck.
No, a cuck is someone who rejects tradition and history in their own life while verbally going on (and on and on…) about its importance, they’re cuckservatives hoping to freeload off the backs of real men’s hard work. For thee but not for me. They’re worthless humans, if they won’t contribute they should emigrate. They’d actually take a class on Penis Studies (Man Studies) because they’re so mind-numbingly boring (predictable, all on the same diet, same clothes, same haircut, same reading material across borders, like a cult of dull) and lacking in individuality.

They’ll say men should be providers – and refuse to provide even for themselves (a mantrum) and worse, defend deadbeats!
Cowardly r-types.

“It’s okay when we do it” hypocrites. They’re socialists who self-loathe in different ways. An abortion clinic on every corner and whore pills in every 13yo girl’s hands would be alright by them! Moral relativists. “Social liberal, economic conservative” cucks. All the gibs, as long as someone else pays.

You can only strike from your gender role if you were competent enough to have ever achieved it.

They reject their gender role, like male SJWs, in favour of materalism, atheistic hedonism (acting like an animal). It’s the exact same thing.
In their own ideal society, they’d be rejects!
Nihilism in the pomo sense of the word is the belief system of losers, it’s their cover for postmodernism while pretending to be oh-so different (special) from the SJWs (narcissism of small differences).
Even this article’s like “this is a new and special thing”.
No? It’s just that we notice because dueling is illegal (otherwise their lip would get them shot by a real man) and they can’t be cannon fodder without an overt war. This is what happens in the dysgenic situation when you let the Low IQ males with delusions of superiority (a self-proclaimed penis pass, if you will, on all sin) run their whining mouth about how, in the most spoiled society ever, they’re still abject failures! Oh, poor baby in your air conditioned palace on welfare! It must be so hard!
Their failure isn’t society’s fault, it’s a character fault and on the contrary, the ones bitching online are exclusively reared in the middle-class (they had advantages).

They have no excuse.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/09/19/middle-class-white-male-memes/

If a meme about a spoiled suburbanite Prince stereotype offends you…. it should.

Shame is GOOD.

Their slide down the social mobility scale is a sign the system works. You aren’t entitled to a better life than your parents unless you work at least as hard (complaining isn’t work).

I’d know.

9/10 they’re actually nagging. But they do nothing themselves. Only nag. We have male shrews! They expect the rest of us will step in like their helicopter parents. You’re an adult, we owe you nothing.

The Boomers are right about the entitled ones. It just happens to be the hippy kids.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/01/24/the-anti-spanking-initiative-is-r-selected/

Nagging only works if you’re bound i.e. parents, marriage. Nagging society doesn’t wash and given the advantages men have on many levels (that they deny “male privilege is a myth” when they seek to evade responsibility or champion with hyperbole “men are superior biologically” to signal, both when it’s convenient, like we don’t notice), they don’t have an excuse that blames women e.g. when boys lose out on math tests and other schoolwork, it’s because they study less around the time they discover porn. Asians can’t watch that stuff all day, look at their grades, it isn’t “all men”, it’s all degenerate men who make poor lifestyle choices. So they want a meritocratic system – but only when it leads to positive outcomes for themselves (liars).

If someone works harder than you, they deserve to beat you! Add up hours studied and you’ll find female (and male) conscientiousness isn’t bias, they activate with their IQ the traits which help them. The guy or girl “winging it” the night before deserves to fail*. Low IQ don’t have the IQ to know what they’re NOT doing! That isn’t everyone else’s fault! If there are systemic forces against men in some fields, the same must be true of women in other fields because that is how systems work, ya dummies!

Otherwise it’s like saying there’s north without south or taste without those tacky cheese squares at the other end of the spectrum. Logic is consistent! Smart men address the topic of stupid men – until they’re shouted down as “sexist” (???), like smart women.

It just so happens by nature that there are more lazy men! So yeah, they fail! Confound!

You cannot ignore the left half of the bell curve, men overpopulate it!

They’ve simply never survived in these numbers before because responsibility is the new leprosy in a decadent West. It makes a lot of sense actually. No prior society (that didn’t collapse) ever had to tolerate this much stupid and it shows.

If we live in clown world, send in the clowns…

War is like sexual selection, it’s a good thing that keeps the bad genes down. The modern world is like adding shit to the pool so it doesn’t feel excluded.
It turns out you don’t need to sterilize irresponsible people, just give them a free sex doll on condition they never have children (or they’d be aborted). We could solve this in two generations if we stopped listening to their “feelings” (they don’t have feelings, relativists, they only ramble and screech).

Seriously, hand them sexbots on condition of no kids to inflict on the future world (and no sex crimes, because apparently their hand wasn’t as big as their ego). They’re genetic suicides anyway, that or move them (could be cheaper) to a literal Pleasure Island with no internet (no corrupting the outside world) and they can never leave (I figured Westworld was about this, a brothel prison with no victims, would’ve been cooler). They’d OD in about a week without the nanny state. Actually, a literal death camp could work very simply: press lever 1 for food or 2 for heroin. Technically, it’s suicide. Dummies are predictably hedonic.

*They’ve been told it’s important for literally over a decade. You can lead a horse to water. Education is wasted on the lazy and stupid, and they’re the same people. That’s Dunning-Kruger. They’re blind to what they’re missing because they’re missing it!

They cannot see past their ego to anything, including Pascal’s Wager. Again, deny and dismiss, typical cuck.
The destructive person (antisocial to society) telling you you deserve to be destroyed (like an SJW) because society sucks unless it’s sucking them off (but it isn’t their job to fix it?)… boys who weren’t raised with real discipline have no shame (sociopath trait). They’ve been allowed to get away with ruining themselves and remaining psychologically as teenagers.

It’s just the dysgenic men too proud to become blatant SJWs. 

Actually worse than SJWs, wow. They’d sell their grandma for a porn star.

You can’t sympathize with people who hate you and your people.
There’s the obvious traitor and the sneaky little shits who under-mine attempts to make things better for everyone because the gap to their own life would become greater. Fifth Column is worse.

This won’t end well, idiots

MRAs are stupid as the SJWs, they’re a form of SJW.

You cut off the vital support for the natalism (healthy courtship and family structures) every society needs.

Most men in the world hate you because of your race! For historical reasons, no negotiation out of this one.

How many is that? Let’s visualize!

Consider soil erosion and the dwindling arable land. Lotta people gonna starve.

And “white” is a very small number of genes swirling around, all recessive!

No Singapore brides for you! (Debt/GDP is also higher than America, idiots).

 

Where all the white people at?

Consider the IQ implications too.

That’s incredibly optimistic. I know plenty of non-whites claiming white on the census.
And Russians are technically not white, based on genetic distance. Neither European nor Asian. That’s a quarter or so down instantly.

And half these figures for the men you seek to cooperate with, who still might want to kill you.

National interests, which you might not care about, but many do!

Ah, America, deluded as usual.

https://www.reference.com/world-view/ratio-men-women-world-population-5afd68eb596fbafb

“The world ratio of men to women is estimated to be 1.017:1. As of today, the world’s male population was 3,776,294,273, while the female population was 3,710,295,643.”

Race > Sex for identity politics.

Statistically, if you are being intellectually honest. Your common culture has nothing to do with the average male of Saudi Arabia or Sub-Saharan Africa. Your WEIRD culture is decidedly racial, not even all white, WASP! The decidedly North-Western European genome! Your work ethic has little in common with an Italian, male or female!

You are already a minority. The world minority, by race.

850k/2 = 425, minus 100 or so for the elderly or infant. (conservatively)

325 million white men of fighting age worldwide.

To say nothing of willing. Most modern men are cowards.

And you think the women are your problem?

Not the almost 7 billion strong racial outgroup and growing??

Sure, they won’t try to steal the women either, where’s the precedent? I’m sure they’ll leave you alone, especially as they starve and you’re so successful and they outnumber you!

The Spartans did so well! You can totally take billions of angry hungry people that build the defense technologies you rely on, to sit around keyboard warrioring about middle-class Gender Studies majors!

(Nobody mentions their bachelor tax and subhuman status of unmarried men, treated like children).

http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/

7.6 billion – 850k white = total N white people.

Then there are class factions, you don’t see upper-class white men having any problems getting work, no middle-class men wanna change this system or present with a strong impetus for Brotherhood collectivism! Which goes so well in China and India btw! No nepotism, totally meritocratic! No men left on the shelf in marriage markets there! And since when has a pan-White male union ever existed? Bloody warfare for millennia.

Oh but feminists are the only deluded ones, O.K.

You can never be questioned or wrong, but you aren’t stupid!

Your assumptions magically prove themselves, look at all your imaginary data and cherry-picked “studies” with no replication or concrete methodology!

All men R smart and all girls R dumb, treehouse cooties ew.

Just ignore the left side of the bell curve, one whole full side of the IQ bell curve.

That’s so smart of you, like the SJWs, if you ignore a problem, it’ll disappear!

Because when you look at homelessness, mental illness and crime rates, it was all magically the fault of women! SOMEHOW.

But women deny responsibility for themselves, don’t they guys?

Men would never do that….

Men would never have the hypoagency to deny the murder, rape and theft rates among their sex, would they? They’d never say NAMALT!

They’re red pill! They’re STRONG.

SATIRE INCOMING:

Men would never cry victim. Like in child support cases. It just doesn’t happen. They don’t deny their gender role to provide as patriarchs. They aren’t postmodernist hippies.

Men deserve respect for breathing, even if they act like children. How dare you shame a Peter Pan into growing up! Magical Freudian penis rules. Europe must respect every African male that treads on this soil, right? Don’t be sexist, like Sweden! Open borders because men never do evil or dishonest things?

Let alone the mathematical majority of them!

Men are more capable than women, so should be held to a fitting, higher standard, right?
No?

And men never rape other men, that’s absurd!

Men cannot be victims. Either that or their super-secret “body language” meant they really wanted it because men are the world’s whores, don’t you know? Always willing with anyone at anytime for anything. Because body language is a science, like palmistry. Even a baby can consent if it gives you special body language like crawling on you or SMILING – Saint Epstein will argue in his legal defence. All rape accusations against a man are false, the stats be damned! We demand to be taken seriously, we aren’t blinkered and ridiculous at all. It’s against the laws of physics for men to be victims of stalking, harassment or “real” rape and if you say any different or hold men to any adult standard of behaviour in the First World, well, you’re a misandrist (but misogyny is just, like, science, duh).

And in the olden days, men never died without reproducing, it just never happened.

Men don’t need impulse control, property rights will magically enforce themselves! I can leave my car unlocked in a diverse male area, I can trust my fellow men! I can let men sleep on my couch without paying rent because Brotherhood! It isn’t parasitism, if a man is doing it!

Men are forced to reproduce. It was an Oops! baby, a mistake! They didn’t know sex made babies! They can’t be held responsible for their reproduction! What did you expect them to do, get a minor simple outpatient procedure to ensure it’s impossible?

BUT men make better parents even though women only exist to make and raise babies. Women evolved to care for children but somehow, men are better at it. Men are better at everything, LOL, duh! Women evolved for no skills, are simple as children (but only female children) and a barren woman is useless to the economy, why are the WW2 women laughing at us?

It isn’t like girls and women pass the exact same blinded examinations men do! The IQ difference is definitely bigger than the statistical chance of 5%, especially once you’ve selectively rigged the results by taking out all the predominantly male retards. That’s just science. You hate science if you complain about systemic bias in calculation.

The tests should be different and the same depending on our feelings.
We don’t know the difference between equal and fair.
But women are hypersensitive and emotional. They make rape jokes about us and sausage gags all the time. Making a man feel bad should be illegal, it’s all that snowflake’s fault! They need to go to their safe space but Gent’s clubs are totally valid. No, none of us are gentlemen and weirdly proud but other men aren’t allowed to impose standards on us either! We’ll call them sexist, too!

And the test must be rigged if they do well! Except military tests, then rigging is good. Except we want the female draft. We don’t hate women, we just want them to go overseas knowing they’ll get murdered or captured and raped by foreigners, cuck!

The highest ideal of manliness is an r-selected, alcoholic, drug-abusing, nomadic manwhore. The Sexual Revolution is unquestionable, ignore antibiotic resistance, paternal abandonment and damaged pair bonding ability. We R da best 5eva. Men can never do better than this and should be shamed for trying.

Damaged goods only applies to women, ignore player burnout. Nothing behind that curtain.

BUT fathers shouldn’t be obligated to co-parent, to spend time with their child as a mentor like the old days to ensure its mental health! When a woman fobs her kid off on the nanny, she’s a heartless monster. When a man fobs his child off on a nanny, he’s being responsible and should be given a medal!

Women have a responsibility to breed like a sow but not men! Because that’s how babies happen! Lesbians!
And furthermore, men have a right to continue their genetic line regardless of quality (this isn’t r) and don’t need to pay a cent while the woman is investing biologically in two decades of labour, totally helpless.

It’s Darwin, men must spread their seed (citation needed), I’m sure the kids will survive.
No men in history weren’t absolute, amoral sluts. None were celibate. None died virgins. No great men weren’t crazed rapists like Genghis Khan. What a great man that slaughtering rapist was.

This is the ultimate good for society, which just happens to coincide with my sloth. It isn’t a sin, I am very lucky. This is not a privilege. I’d gladly swap with my ancestors to see more women in dresses.

It’s a coincidence I can act like a big baby and society enables this.

The problem is WOMEN.

I’m oppressed by all the free lust, free welfare, free schooling, free sympathy for my sin!

I hate that my vices bring no consequences, really! I want a Patriarchy, just like you, fellow conservative!

Stop being degenerate? What? It’s my right!!! How dare you! Next you’ll want me to pay for my sexual partner’s birth control! Oh, in Patriarchy?

Well, no, I’d just be raping your Christian teenage daughters and haha, you couldn’t stop me… what’s… what’s the rope for…?

And you’d totally have to pay for my “girlfriend’s” abortions. Not me. You pay for my orgasms. Because I exist.

Prostitution is wrong because then sex has a price paid for by me, person in receipt of service! It belongs on the taxpayer, that’s the moral choice!

It’s never been easier to survive in all of human history but this world sucks because there aren’t busty under-age Japanese girls servicing me under the table at every meal. Women are so entitled to want a husband. But they should find one or they’re defective.

I don’t wanna save for my own pension like a sucker.

We are not the luckiest and laziest excuses for men ever! Wastrel is still a word that totally has meaning now everyone is doing it, so it’s moral! It’s legal too so it mustn’t be antisocial!

Also gay is evil but lesbians are holy. Obviously? It’s just obvious porn does no damage. Fuck neuroscience.

Government largess is only evil when single mothers are doing it, when men hold the baby, they deserve all the money in the world. In. The. World. Or you’re sexist. And I’ll cry at you online but rape threats are funny, totally not to be taken seriously. You’re so weak, we don’t bully anyone. I’d totally say this to your face in public. Twitter is a public space.

R-selection can magically be contained to one sex despite being a sexual selection process between two sexes in societies.

We need traditional marriage and only traditional marriage – except I can cheat without being stoned to death, have bastard children and leave if I get bored without being sued for abandonment. That’s what commitment means. I’m such a catch, why does no good woman want me?

Women are females but male is insulting. Girl is normal and a compliment but if you call me boy, I can attack you. The law says whatever I want it to.

We don’t believe in “male”, it’s a social construct to tell us to man-up like we’re adults or something biological. But there are two sexes and we’re totally different. But we’re tired of double standards, women should be treated equally to men, it isn’t fair. We’re so rational. Ignore the suicidal ideation, all men should be like us. I’d choose this life again. Pass my antidepressants and testosterone pills. This is normal.

SATIRE OVER. Back to the demographic.

And I’m sure there won’t be any anti-white traitors in the white or non-white male group either.

In your dreams.

Where you all happen to have an IQ of 128-135, as you claim online.
But cannot do basic arithmetic like that up top, somehow.

You are not entitled to a waifu, you gotta earn it. That’s the red pill. This economy sucks for everyone. You are not special. Life really is that hard.

The First World is paying for the older generations’ “entitlement” and the rest of the world, with a reduced population. It isn’t the women. You say it’s white women going on welfare while admitting out the other side of your face that the birth rate is next to nothing. Okay, ban birth control? Marry? No? I think you’re too chicken to admit the other factors.

This is biodiversity 101 and you fail. If you think either sex can afford to rentseek and be spiteful, you can’t do maths.
The SJWs ignore it because they want to kill Western Civ, idiots. They don’t just hate white men, it’s women too! Rotherham? 

Misogyny makes no sense, it’s still your suicide and also that of your genetic line (kin).

You sure showed those SJWs, giving them exactly what they want!

Verbal abuse okay when women do it

As long as there is no penis in the vicinity, it’s kosher according to the Guardian.

Shut up and take it, white women!

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/08/how-white-women-use-strategic-tears-to-avoid-accountability

Ah, comment is free.

And no comments allowed.

How’s that freedom of speech ya got there?

This is gaslighting them …. for supposedly gaslighting.

Defending yourself and telling the truth is not gaslighting.

Note how the lower IQ must cheat, they can’t fight fair, even to one another.

It reminds me of Musk calling his wife crying over their dead son “emotional blackmail”. No, tears are legitimate expressions and not violent. Civilization was the first man who hurled an insult instead of a punch – is true. How many white authors on the Guardian make it so popular, huh? If you keep making white women cry maybe you ARE a bully. As we know from trolling, they might be committing a hate crime about both women and white people.

Shut up and agree and doubt your sanity, white bitches!

You aren’t allowed problems, you don’t have the melanin!

I could use that GIF on almost every post. It’s so relevant.

You aren’t allowed feelings that a non-white disapproves of!
But since they can’t get you on hate SPEECH, it’s hate FEELS.

Your feelings are wrong and your behaviours can and should be controlled by your moral and social superiors, who know exactly how you should live your life but Patriarchy was awful, y’all.

How long until their version of Battered Wives (Battered Whites?) Syndrome kicks in?

Intersectionality has murdered signalling SJWism.

I don’t say feminism because that’s long gone.

This is the monster in its place, wearing the face.

You don’t go prog stack. You don’t let the inmates run the asylum.

They over-run your movement like they did your country.

Do they wanna help Africa? Fuck no. They’ll just blame Whitey yet again.

White people iz Satan, apparently. Your death wouldn’t be suitable reparations.

~~~~~Let it go, let it go!~~~~~

Nicki Minaj’s Nazi video on a throne is your future. I hope you’re happy.

Sisterhood was always a lie, there needs to be a Queen Bee and ideally they’re the best specimen, overall most competent.

Eventually, you know, they’ll say being blonde should be illegal.
Or all white women should be shot to prevent future breeding of slavers, some shit.

They literally have no line. Mad with power.

People think my jokes are impossible until they happen.

Here’s the formula:

Current victim group + Insanity + Excuse to be lazy + Money

Women were coal-miners

achtually.jpeg

https://digital.library.lse.ac.uk/objects/lse:daj714zik

As were children, you don’t hear them trying to signal with it. It’s rare to find a male-specific line of work women weren’t roped into at some point.

Why do Americans lie?

Are they too dumb to look it up?

Intellectual dishonest?

Shallow?

Is it because they don’t have a history without us?

For once, the feminists got a point. Working conditions are important but since men worked in more factories, it uplifted men at the same time – something they had no problem with.

Look at all the issues with matchstick factories exploding and asbestos inhalation.

It’s particularly grating because all of the men complaining about miners refuse to do that kind of labour now. Yes, that’s right, they totally claim a gender role only to reject it in practice.

Nice freedom ya got there.

Snowflakes.

Lobsters in a bucket

https://old.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/8m36mt/jordan_peterson_does_an_ama_drama_is_rich_as/

When your ideas would pass muster in the 60s, they’re probably Pollyanna crap-trap.

They’re desperate for establishment approval, to over-run the corrupt establishment.

And yes, I could run this entire blog in GIF form without a hitch.

OT Since nobody asks me.

Misogynists have issues with their fathers.
Misandrists have issues with their mothers.
Think about it. They identify too much uncritically with the same-sex parent. Identification is a defense mechanism because as children they lacked the authority to challenge the parent. They remain emotionally regressed and with other factors, may become disturbed e.g. rape fantasies and semen/period art.
This is standard info if you bother to ask around. They seek out unhealthy, codependent bonding with the same sex (who always seems to let them down, repetition) and rationalize this as a failure in the other, entirely, the whole group. They deny evidence as exceptions. Denial, another mechanism. Displacement of anger to other parent, as the same-sex parent did too (toxic role modelling).
They can’t fulfill their own gender role (actions) and blame the faulty connection on the opposite sex. The opposite sex becomes their externalized Shadow of pure evil. They never integrate it and seek to exorcise themselves by punishing it and its representatives (a sign of inferiority). Over time they feel worse because it’s a part of them (anima/animus) and must come to be loved.

Few reach that stage ever. They loop (repetition) and ruin their life (and other’s).
It isn’t their fault, it’s their childhood, they say.

This exonerates them of all blame and guilt (and agency and control of their life).

I just taught you what Peterson never, ever will. The secret to his success, bad fathers and misplaced angst and shame.

If penis envy is real, so too must be womb envy.

Why don’t women get involved in personality cults like Musk, Peterson, Hitchens, Dawkins? Why is it always the men? Women talk it out. Men deny, deny, deny, until their health deteriorates. Evolution programmed men for blind obedience. They rationalize this as a good thing because no woman is involved to blame. Remember, they avoid conflict with other men. Idolatry is appeasement. They can’t stand up against their father, they don’t stand for anything else (they are not men).

Did Einstein steal the Theory of Relativity?

Celebrity scientists are trash, repeat after me.

https://teslaresearch.jimdo.com/dynamic-theory-of-gravity/ru%C4%91er-josip-bo%C5%A1kovi%C4%87-1711-1787/

Especially theoretical physicists.

The discovery of the DNA structure would’ve been impossible without the imaging provided (and borrowed without asking) by a woman. Who got the Nobel Prize? The two dudes. Including the one who did the borrowing and showed it to the other guy.

That is established fact, FYI.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosalind_Franklin

She died of cancer.

Prior to the Nobel nomination.

https://www.sciencehistory.org/historical-profile/james-watson-francis-crick-maurice-wilkins-and-rosalind-franklin

But of course, where’s the proof of sexism in STEM, internet bros?

These people are so dispassionate and pure, they’d never lie or steal.

“Of the four DNA researchers, only Rosalind Franklin had any degrees in chemistry.”

As for Einstein, he ripped a lot of a lot off.

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/427621/did-einsteins-first-wife-secretly-coauthor-his-1905-relativity-paper/

However, Weinstein has analysed the letters in detail and says that two lines of evidence suggest that this was unlikely.

No motive there.

He used his first wife to do his mathematics, a thing he admitted in his letters.

There is one fly in the ointment. Maric and Einstein divorced in 1919, but as part of the divorce settlement, Einstein agreed to pay his ex-wife every krona of any future Nobel Prize he might be awarded.

Then he dumped her and married a cousin or something?

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/the-forgotten-life-of-einsteins-first-wife/

But where’s the evidence of sexism, guys?

https://www.inverse.com/article/31669-genius-einstein-mileva-maric-nobel-prize

Where would you even look for that?

I just don’t see it anywhere, there is nothing suspicious.

The guy has zippo, works in a place as the lowliest type of clerk where ideas are submitted (including scientific ones, at the time) and BOOM, full of ideas. Sheer, amazing, epic coincidence.

Einstein’s brain

http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2014/04/21/the-tragic-story-of-how-einsteins-brain-was-stolen-and-wasnt-even-special/

Einstein didn’t want his brain or body to be studied; he didn’t want to be worshipped. “He had left behind specific instructions regarding his remains: cremate them, and scatter the ashes secretly in order to discourage idolaters,” writes Brian Burrell

Technically corpse rape

But Harvey took the brain anyway, without permission from Einstein or his family. 

Harvey would tell stories about the brain, about cutting off chunks to send to researchers around the world. Burroughs, in turn, would boast to visitors that he could have a piece of Einstein any time he wanted.

Pure, innocent nerds.

Because a human brain is like a steak and you can just slice a lil’ bit off to give out.

To fast forward a bit: Come 1985, Harvey and collaborators in California published the first study of Einstein’s brain, claiming that it had an abnormal proportion of two types of cells, neurons and glia. That study was followed by five others (the most recent published just this month), reporting additional differences in individual cells or in particular structures in Einstein’s brain. The researchers behind these studies say studying Einstein’s brain could help uncover the neurological underpinnings of intelligence.

No.

And the study couldn’t have been published with a “no, he was totally normal guys!” result.

But that premise is nonsense and the studies are bunk, at least according to Terence Hines, a professor of psychology at Pace University.

A couple of weeks ago, Hines presented a poster at the Cognitive Neuroscience Society annual meeting outlining all of the ways in which each of the six studies is flawed. Some highlights:

That is the academic equivalent of a plate-spinning roast to end all roasts.

Perhaps most problematic, counting cells is a subjective business, and the researchers performing the cell counts were not blind to which tissue was Einstein’s and which was not.

Innocent little angels who dindu nuffin.

 There were no differences in the number of neurons or the size of neurons, the study found, but Einstein’s tissue was thinner than controls.

It was stored in a basement.
Have you stored meat in a basement?

More densely packed neurons, the authors speculated, means that cell-to-cell messages travel shorter differences, which might mean faster processing speed overall. That’s quite a stretch. As Hines calls out in his poster, the finding was based on just one square millimeter of Einstein’s brain.

What’s more, the authors admit to not reporting any of the ways in which Einstein’s brain was similar to controls.

“Yes we lied but you’re an Anti-Semite or something???”

It’s like just missing the beach house off your tax returns.

They forgot guys.

Totally innocent mistake, could’ve happened to anyone who stole lumps out a celebrity’s corpse.

(This is almost as bad as the Monroe necrophiliacs story).

–In 1999, Harvey and Canadian collaborators got Einstein’s brain into one of the world’s most prestigious medical journalsThe Lancet.

Appeal to authority.

Based on old photographs

Do I have to mock this one?

I’m skipping this one.

that had been taken of Einstein’s brain before it was cut up, the researchers claimed that Einstein had an abnormal folding pattern in part of his parietal lobe, a region that has been linked to mathematical ability.

It doesn’t work like that.

They also reported that his parietal lobes were 15 percent wider, and more symmetrical, than those of control brains. Once again, though, the researchers were not blinded to which photographs showed Einstein’s brain. And though the authors were quick to make links between these supposed differences and Einstein’s mathematical prowess, Hines points out that Einstein wasn’t, in fact, a great mathematician.

Even if the statistics were sound, you’d still have the problem of attributing skills and behaviors to anatomy.

phrenology has a sound basis
especially compared to this

There’s no way to know

just the way uhuh uhuh 
they like it
uhuh uhuh

This is neurobiology, remember. Science is easy to fake out.

if X thing in Einstein’s brain made Einstein smart/dyslexic/good at math/you name it, or was just an X thing in his brain.

Dya wanna know the truth?

You’re on this site so I guess ya do.

Behaviours change the brain. This has been known forever. Read any good book and it’ll mention this. The Taxi Driver study is most famous: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17024677

There are others of the same concept

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3541490/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22814662

You can literally grow parts of your brain by being a little bit weird.

Let’s see which brain part they claimed was different, most frequently?

his parietal lobes were 15 percent wider,”

https://eocinstitute.org/meditation/10-key-brain-regions-upgraded-with-meditation-2/#codeword7

http://www.andrewnewberg.com/research/

“When we scanned the brains of Tibetan Buddhist meditators, we found decreased activity in the parietal lobe during meditation”

It makes you toothless. It’s like an evolutionary roll back.

“MRI images showed more brain matter density in the compassion, learning and memory centers in the hippocampus compared to pre-meditation scans. Interestingly, gray matter in the amygdala, a stress and anxiety center, shrank.”

[obviously something like porn couldn’t change the brain ever…]

Meditation (and prayer) literally alters your brain (but meditation is a form of prayer whatever the hippies say and the neuroscience proves it).

https://draxe.com/increase-size-your-brain/

The musical ability might’ve easily caused any brain structure differences.

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2009/04/closer-look-einsteins-brain

“The findings also suggest that Einstein’s famed love of music was reflected in the anatomy of his brain.”

“Witelson’s team found that Einstein’s parietal lobes–which are implicated in mathematical, visual, and spatial cognition–were 15% wider than normal parietal lobes. The team also found other unusual features in the parietal region, although some of these were questioned by other researchers at the time.”

And music.

“One parameter that did not explain Einstein’s mental prowess, however, was the size of his brain: At 1230 grams, it fell at the low end of average for modern humans.”

And the parietal lobe is linked with music.

e.g.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155291

Activation in the Right Inferior Parietal Lobule Reflects the Representation of Musical Structure beyond Simple Pitch Discrimination

But that doesn’t affect size, you say?

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00636/full

Structural MRI-data revealed significant volumetric differences between the brains of keyboard players, who practiced intensively and controls in right sensorimotor areas and the corticospinal tract as well as in the entorhinal cortex and the left superior parietal lobule. Moreover, they showed also larger volumes in a comparable set of regions than the less intensively practicing musicians. The structural changes in the sensory and motor systems correspond well to the behavioral results, and can be interpreted in terms of plasticity as a result of intensive motor training.

Areas of the superior parietal lobule and the entorhinal cortex might be enlarged in musicians due to their special skills in sight-playing and memorizing of scores. In conclusion, intensive and specific musical training seems to have an impact on brain structure, not only during the sensitive period of childhood but throughout life.

I know my shit.

Neuroscience isn’t that hard. Well, apparently it’s hard for the people being paid to not notice this one thing that a non-neuroscientist can notice. You can see it too, right?

One more.

He imagined tons of stuff, right? See things, bit like a schizo?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3420742/

Parietal Lobes in Schizophrenia: Do They Matter?

TLDR: what the fuck do you think.

“We want to propose that in a proportion of individuals with emerging schizophrenia structural and functional alterations may start in the PL

Too tenuous? O.K.

https://www.livescience.com/49244-imagination-reality-brain-flow-direction.html

“In doing so, the parietal lobe assembles elementary building bricks from so-called “lower-order” brain regions to create concepts, said Daniela Dentico, a researcher at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and lead author on the report.”

Thinking a lot, daydreaming, would cause the parietal cells to thicken.

“A leading theory in image processing “posits that our visual mental images are not stored somewhere in the brain, but get actively reconstructed,”

“The researchers could not determine, however, whether imagination originates in the parietal lobe. It may instead flow through the parietal lobe

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942635/

Imagination study.

“Purposeful behavior with objects and tools can be assessed in a variety of ways, including actual use, pantomimed use, and pure imagery of manipulation.”

Perhaps most damning of all, sex difference.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2680714/

“We found that women had proportionately greater gray matter volume in the parietal lobe compared to men, and this morphologic difference was disadvantageous ” (for task)

He had a brain like a chick.

Compare Einstein’s brain to another elderly Jewish fantasy-prone musician and you might have a study.

https://www.bmj.com/content/352/bmj.i969

A matched case study.

“In contrast, we found that men compared to women had proportionately greater parietal lobe surface area, and this morphologic difference was associated with a performance advantage for men on mental rotation.”

Does that mean flatter? But I’ve also seen reference to greater volume? Whatever.

Magical flip flop.

You can get that difference by playing a lot of Brain Training.

Back to the good article.

It makes me angry to think of all that was wasted in these investigations.

There was the monetary cost of the studies — money that could have been spent on work that was not doomed from the outset to fail. There was a personal cost, in that Einstein’s family was essentially strong-armed into agreeing to participate in research that Einstein explicitly did not want to participate in. And there was a public cost, too. In popular-press accounts of these studies over the years, the public was misled about the findings and their supposed scientific value.

Here’s how smart Einstein was — he understood all too well the public’s obsession with him, our obsession with celebrity and special-ness. He knew that if given the chance, scientists would pore over his brain’s neurons and glia, sulci and gyri, and make grand pronouncements about what makes a genius. And he knew it would be bullshit.

Maybe because he knew it would be average?

I do feel sorry for the guy, it’s a horror show to steal someone’s body parts and tamper with them post-mortem. He made it clear he didn’t want it, the family’s permission means nil.