This won’t end well, idiots

MRAs are stupid as the SJWs, they’re a form of SJW.

You cut off the vital support for the natalism (healthy courtship and family structures) every society needs.

Most men in the world hate you because of your race! For historical reasons, no negotiation out of this one.

How many is that? Let’s visualize!

Consider soil erosion and the dwindling arable land. Lotta people gonna starve.

And “white” is a very small number of genes swirling around, all recessive!

No Singapore brides for you! (Debt/GDP is also higher than America, idiots).

 

Where all the white people at?

Consider the IQ implications too.

That’s incredibly optimistic. I know plenty of non-whites claiming white on the census.
And Russians are technically not white, based on genetic distance. Neither European nor Asian. That’s a quarter or so down instantly.

And half these figures for the men you seek to cooperate with, who still might want to kill you.

National interests, which you might not care about, but many do!

Ah, America, deluded as usual.

https://www.reference.com/world-view/ratio-men-women-world-population-5afd68eb596fbafb

“The world ratio of men to women is estimated to be 1.017:1. As of today, the world’s male population was 3,776,294,273, while the female population was 3,710,295,643.”

Race > Sex for identity politics.

Statistically, if you are being intellectually honest. Your common culture has nothing to do with the average male of Saudi Arabia or Sub-Saharan Africa. Your WEIRD culture is decidedly racial, not even all white, WASP! The decidedly North-Western European genome! Your work ethic has little in common with an Italian, male or female!

You are already a minority. The world minority, by race.

850k/2 = 425, minus 100 or so for the elderly or infant. (conservatively)

325 million white men of fighting age worldwide.

To say nothing of willing. Most modern men are cowards.

And you think the women are your problem?

Not the almost 7 billion strong racial outgroup and growing??

Sure, they won’t try to steal the women either, where’s the precedent? I’m sure they’ll leave you alone, especially as they starve and you’re so successful and they outnumber you!

The Spartans did so well! You can totally take billions of angry hungry people that build the defense technologies you rely on, to sit around keyboard warrioring about middle-class Gender Studies majors!

(Nobody mentions their bachelor tax and subhuman status of unmarried men, treated like children).

http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/

7.6 billion – 850k white = total N white people.

Then there are class factions, you don’t see upper-class white men having any problems getting work, no middle-class men wanna change this system or present with a strong impetus for Brotherhood collectivism! Which goes so well in China and India btw! No nepotism, totally meritocratic! No men left on the shelf in marriage markets there! And since when has a pan-White male union ever existed? Bloody warfare for millennia.

Oh but feminists are the only deluded ones, O.K.

You can never be questioned or wrong, but you aren’t stupid!

Your assumptions magically prove themselves, look at all your imaginary data and cherry-picked “studies” with no replication or concrete methodology!

All men R smart and all girls R dumb, treehouse cooties ew.

Just ignore the left side of the bell curve, one whole full side of the IQ bell curve.

That’s so smart of you, like the SJWs, if you ignore a problem, it’ll disappear!

Because when you look at homelessness, mental illness and crime rates, it was all magically the fault of women! SOMEHOW.

But women deny responsibility for themselves, don’t they guys?

Men would never do that….

Men would never have the hypoagency to deny the murder, rape and theft rates among their sex, would they? They’d never say NAMALT!

They’re red pill! They’re STRONG.

SATIRE INCOMING:

Men would never cry victim. Like in child support cases. It just doesn’t happen. They don’t deny their gender role to provide as patriarchs. They aren’t postmodernist hippies.

Men deserve respect for breathing, even if they act like children. How dare you shame a Peter Pan into growing up! Magical Freudian penis rules. Europe must respect every African male that treads on this soil, right? Don’t be sexist, like Sweden! Open borders because men never do evil or dishonest things?

Let alone the mathematical majority of them!

Men are more capable than women, so should be held to a fitting, higher standard, right?
No?

And men never rape other men, that’s absurd!

Men cannot be victims. Either that or their super-secret “body language” meant they really wanted it because men are the world’s whores, don’t you know? Always willing with anyone at anytime for anything. Because body language is a science, like palmistry. Even a baby can consent if it gives you special body language like crawling on you or SMILING – Saint Epstein will argue in his legal defence. All rape accusations against a man are false, the stats be damned! We demand to be taken seriously, we aren’t blinkered and ridiculous at all. It’s against the laws of physics for men to be victims of stalking, harassment or “real” rape and if you say any different or hold men to any adult standard of behaviour in the First World, well, you’re a misandrist (but misogyny is just, like, science, duh).

And in the olden days, men never died without reproducing, it just never happened.

Men don’t need impulse control, property rights will magically enforce themselves! I can leave my car unlocked in a diverse male area, I can trust my fellow men! I can let men sleep on my couch without paying rent because Brotherhood! It isn’t parasitism, if a man is doing it!

Men are forced to reproduce. It was an Oops! baby, a mistake! They didn’t know sex made babies! They can’t be held responsible for their reproduction! What did you expect them to do, get a minor simple outpatient procedure to ensure it’s impossible?

BUT men make better parents even though women only exist to make and raise babies. Women evolved to care for children but somehow, men are better at it. Men are better at everything, LOL, duh! Women evolved for no skills, are simple as children (but only female children) and a barren woman is useless to the economy, why are the WW2 women laughing at us?

It isn’t like girls and women pass the exact same blinded examinations men do! The IQ difference is definitely bigger than the statistical chance of 5%, especially once you’ve selectively rigged the results by taking out all the predominantly male retards. That’s just science. You hate science if you complain about systemic bias in calculation.

The tests should be different and the same depending on our feelings.
We don’t know the difference between equal and fair.
But women are hypersensitive and emotional. They make rape jokes about us and sausage gags all the time. Making a man feel bad should be illegal, it’s all that snowflake’s fault! They need to go to their safe space but Gent’s clubs are totally valid. No, none of us are gentlemen and weirdly proud but other men aren’t allowed to impose standards on us either! We’ll call them sexist, too!

And the test must be rigged if they do well! Except military tests, then rigging is good. Except we want the female draft. We don’t hate women, we just want them to go overseas knowing they’ll get murdered or captured and raped by foreigners, cuck!

The highest ideal of manliness is an r-selected, alcoholic, drug-abusing, nomadic manwhore. The Sexual Revolution is unquestionable, ignore antibiotic resistance, paternal abandonment and damaged pair bonding ability. We R da best 5eva. Men can never do better than this and should be shamed for trying.

Damaged goods only applies to women, ignore player burnout. Nothing behind that curtain.

BUT fathers shouldn’t be obligated to co-parent, to spend time with their child as a mentor like the old days to ensure its mental health! When a woman fobs her kid off on the nanny, she’s a heartless monster. When a man fobs his child off on a nanny, he’s being responsible and should be given a medal!

Women have a responsibility to breed like a sow but not men! Because that’s how babies happen! Lesbians!
And furthermore, men have a right to continue their genetic line regardless of quality (this isn’t r) and don’t need to pay a cent while the woman is investing biologically in two decades of labour, totally helpless.

It’s Darwin, men must spread their seed (citation needed), I’m sure the kids will survive.
No men in history weren’t absolute, amoral sluts. None were celibate. None died virgins. No great men weren’t crazed rapists like Genghis Khan. What a great man that slaughtering rapist was.

This is the ultimate good for society, which just happens to coincide with my sloth. It isn’t a sin, I am very lucky. This is not a privilege. I’d gladly swap with my ancestors to see more women in dresses.

It’s a coincidence I can act like a big baby and society enables this.

The problem is WOMEN.

I’m oppressed by all the free lust, free welfare, free schooling, free sympathy for my sin!

I hate that my vices bring no consequences, really! I want a Patriarchy, just like you, fellow conservative!

Stop being degenerate? What? It’s my right!!! How dare you! Next you’ll want me to pay for my sexual partner’s birth control! Oh, in Patriarchy?

Well, no, I’d just be raping your Christian teenage daughters and haha, you couldn’t stop me… what’s… what’s the rope for…?

And you’d totally have to pay for my “girlfriend’s” abortions. Not me. You pay for my orgasms. Because I exist.

Prostitution is wrong because then sex has a price paid for by me, person in receipt of service! It belongs on the taxpayer, that’s the moral choice!

It’s never been easier to survive in all of human history but this world sucks because there aren’t busty under-age Japanese girls servicing me under the table at every meal. Women are so entitled to want a husband. But they should find one or they’re defective.

I don’t wanna save for my own pension like a sucker.

We are not the luckiest and laziest excuses for men ever! Wastrel is still a word that totally has meaning now everyone is doing it, so it’s moral! It’s legal too so it mustn’t be antisocial!

Also gay is evil but lesbians are holy. Obviously? It’s just obvious porn does no damage. Fuck neuroscience.

Government largess is only evil when single mothers are doing it, when men hold the baby, they deserve all the money in the world. In. The. World. Or you’re sexist. And I’ll cry at you online but rape threats are funny, totally not to be taken seriously. You’re so weak, we don’t bully anyone. I’d totally say this to your face in public. Twitter is a public space.

R-selection can magically be contained to one sex despite being a sexual selection process between two sexes in societies.

We need traditional marriage and only traditional marriage – except I can cheat without being stoned to death, have bastard children and leave if I get bored without being sued for abandonment. That’s what commitment means. I’m such a catch, why does no good woman want me?

Women are females but male is insulting. Girl is normal and a compliment but if you call me boy, I can attack you. The law says whatever I want it to.

We don’t believe in “male”, it’s a social construct to tell us to man-up like we’re adults or something biological. But there are two sexes and we’re totally different. But we’re tired of double standards, women should be treated equally to men, it isn’t fair. We’re so rational. Ignore the suicidal ideation, all men should be like us. I’d choose this life again. Pass my antidepressants and testosterone pills. This is normal.

SATIRE OVER. Back to the demographic.

And I’m sure there won’t be any anti-white traitors in the white or non-white male group either.

In your dreams.

Where you all happen to have an IQ of 128-135, as you claim online.
But cannot do basic arithmetic like that up top, somehow.

You are not entitled to a waifu, you gotta earn it. That’s the red pill. This economy sucks for everyone. You are not special. Life really is that hard.

The First World is paying for the older generations’ “entitlement” and the rest of the world, with a reduced population. It isn’t the women. You say it’s white women going on welfare while admitting out the other side of your face that the birth rate is next to nothing. Okay, ban birth control? Marry? No? I think you’re too chicken to admit the other factors.

This is biodiversity 101 and you fail. If you think either sex can afford to rentseek and be spiteful, you can’t do maths.
The SJWs ignore it because they want to kill Western Civ, idiots. They don’t just hate white men, it’s women too! Rotherham? 

Misogyny makes no sense, it’s still your suicide and also that of your genetic line (kin).

You sure showed those SJWs, giving them exactly what they want!

Verbal abuse okay when women do it

As long as there is no penis in the vicinity, it’s kosher according to the Guardian.

Shut up and take it, white women!

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/08/how-white-women-use-strategic-tears-to-avoid-accountability

Ah, comment is free.

And no comments allowed.

How’s that freedom of speech ya got there?

This is gaslighting them …. for supposedly gaslighting.

Defending yourself and telling the truth is not gaslighting.

Note how the lower IQ must cheat, they can’t fight fair, even to one another.

It reminds me of Musk calling his wife crying over their dead son “emotional blackmail”. No, tears are legitimate expressions and not violent. Civilization was the first man who hurled an insult instead of a punch – is true. How many white authors on the Guardian make it so popular, huh? If you keep making white women cry maybe you ARE a bully. As we know from trolling, they might be committing a hate crime about both women and white people.

Shut up and agree and doubt your sanity, white bitches!

You aren’t allowed problems, you don’t have the melanin!

I could use that GIF on almost every post. It’s so relevant.

You aren’t allowed feelings that a non-white disapproves of!
But since they can’t get you on hate SPEECH, it’s hate FEELS.

Your feelings are wrong and your behaviours can and should be controlled by your moral and social superiors, who know exactly how you should live your life but Patriarchy was awful, y’all.

How long until their version of Battered Wives (Battered Whites?) Syndrome kicks in?

Intersectionality has murdered signalling SJWism.

I don’t say feminism because that’s long gone.

This is the monster in its place, wearing the face.

You don’t go prog stack. You don’t let the inmates run the asylum.

They over-run your movement like they did your country.

Do they wanna help Africa? Fuck no. They’ll just blame Whitey yet again.

White people iz Satan, apparently. Your death wouldn’t be suitable reparations.

~~~~~Let it go, let it go!~~~~~

Nicki Minaj’s Nazi video on a throne is your future. I hope you’re happy.

Sisterhood was always a lie, there needs to be a Queen Bee and ideally they’re the best specimen, overall most competent.

Eventually, you know, they’ll say being blonde should be illegal.
Or all white women should be shot to prevent future breeding of slavers, some shit.

They literally have no line. Mad with power.

People think my jokes are impossible until they happen.

Here’s the formula:

Current victim group + Insanity + Excuse to be lazy + Money

Women were coal-miners

achtually.jpeg

https://digital.library.lse.ac.uk/objects/lse:daj714zik

As were children, you don’t hear them trying to signal with it. It’s rare to find a male-specific line of work women weren’t roped into at some point.

Why do Americans lie?

Are they too dumb to look it up?

Intellectual dishonest?

Shallow?

Is it because they don’t have a history without us?

For once, the feminists got a point. Working conditions are important but since men worked in more factories, it uplifted men at the same time – something they had no problem with.

Look at all the issues with matchstick factories exploding and asbestos inhalation.

It’s particularly grating because all of the men complaining about miners refuse to do that kind of labour now. Yes, that’s right, they totally claim a gender role only to reject it in practice.

Nice freedom ya got there.

Snowflakes.

Lobsters in a bucket

https://old.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/8m36mt/jordan_peterson_does_an_ama_drama_is_rich_as/

When your ideas would pass muster in the 60s, they’re probably Pollyanna crap-trap.

They’re desperate for establishment approval, to over-run the corrupt establishment.

And yes, I could run this entire blog in GIF form without a hitch.

OT Since nobody asks me.

Misogynists have issues with their fathers.
Misandrists have issues with their mothers.
Think about it. They identify too much uncritically with the same-sex parent. Identification is a defense mechanism because as children they lacked the authority to challenge the parent. They remain emotionally regressed and with other factors, may become disturbed e.g. rape fantasies and semen/period art.
This is standard info if you bother to ask around. They seek out unhealthy, codependent bonding with the same sex (who always seems to let them down, repetition) and rationalize this as a failure in the other, entirely, the whole group. They deny evidence as exceptions. Denial, another mechanism. Displacement of anger to other parent, as the same-sex parent did too (toxic role modelling).
They can’t fulfill their own gender role (actions) and blame the faulty connection on the opposite sex. The opposite sex becomes their externalized Shadow of pure evil. They never integrate it and seek to exorcise themselves by punishing it and its representatives (a sign of inferiority). Over time they feel worse because it’s a part of them (anima/animus) and must come to be loved.

Few reach that stage ever. They loop (repetition) and ruin their life (and other’s).
It isn’t their fault, it’s their childhood, they say.

This exonerates them of all blame and guilt (and agency and control of their life).

I just taught you what Peterson never, ever will. The secret to his success, bad fathers and misplaced angst and shame.

If penis envy is real, so too must be womb envy.

Why don’t women get involved in personality cults like Musk, Peterson, Hitchens, Dawkins? Why is it always the men? Women talk it out. Men deny, deny, deny, until their health deteriorates. Evolution programmed men for blind obedience. They rationalize this as a good thing because no woman is involved to blame. Remember, they avoid conflict with other men. Idolatry is appeasement. They can’t stand up against their father, they don’t stand for anything else (they are not men).

Did Einstein steal the Theory of Relativity?

Celebrity scientists are trash, repeat after me.

https://teslaresearch.jimdo.com/dynamic-theory-of-gravity/ru%C4%91er-josip-bo%C5%A1kovi%C4%87-1711-1787/

Especially theoretical physicists.

The discovery of the DNA structure would’ve been impossible without the imaging provided (and borrowed without asking) by a woman. Who got the Nobel Prize? The two dudes. Including the one who did the borrowing and showed it to the other guy.

That is established fact, FYI.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosalind_Franklin

She died of cancer.

Prior to the Nobel nomination.

https://www.sciencehistory.org/historical-profile/james-watson-francis-crick-maurice-wilkins-and-rosalind-franklin

But of course, where’s the proof of sexism in STEM, internet bros?

These people are so dispassionate and pure, they’d never lie or steal.

“Of the four DNA researchers, only Rosalind Franklin had any degrees in chemistry.”

As for Einstein, he ripped a lot of a lot off.

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/427621/did-einsteins-first-wife-secretly-coauthor-his-1905-relativity-paper/

However, Weinstein has analysed the letters in detail and says that two lines of evidence suggest that this was unlikely.

No motive there.

He used his first wife to do his mathematics, a thing he admitted in his letters.

There is one fly in the ointment. Maric and Einstein divorced in 1919, but as part of the divorce settlement, Einstein agreed to pay his ex-wife every krona of any future Nobel Prize he might be awarded.

Then he dumped her and married a cousin or something?

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/the-forgotten-life-of-einsteins-first-wife/

But where’s the evidence of sexism, guys?

https://www.inverse.com/article/31669-genius-einstein-mileva-maric-nobel-prize

Where would you even look for that?

I just don’t see it anywhere, there is nothing suspicious.

The guy has zippo, works in a place as the lowliest type of clerk where ideas are submitted (including scientific ones, at the time) and BOOM, full of ideas. Sheer, amazing, epic coincidence.

Einstein’s brain

http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2014/04/21/the-tragic-story-of-how-einsteins-brain-was-stolen-and-wasnt-even-special/

Einstein didn’t want his brain or body to be studied; he didn’t want to be worshipped. “He had left behind specific instructions regarding his remains: cremate them, and scatter the ashes secretly in order to discourage idolaters,” writes Brian Burrell

Technically corpse rape

But Harvey took the brain anyway, without permission from Einstein or his family. 

Harvey would tell stories about the brain, about cutting off chunks to send to researchers around the world. Burroughs, in turn, would boast to visitors that he could have a piece of Einstein any time he wanted.

Pure, innocent nerds.

Because a human brain is like a steak and you can just slice a lil’ bit off to give out.

To fast forward a bit: Come 1985, Harvey and collaborators in California published the first study of Einstein’s brain, claiming that it had an abnormal proportion of two types of cells, neurons and glia. That study was followed by five others (the most recent published just this month), reporting additional differences in individual cells or in particular structures in Einstein’s brain. The researchers behind these studies say studying Einstein’s brain could help uncover the neurological underpinnings of intelligence.

No.

And the study couldn’t have been published with a “no, he was totally normal guys!” result.

But that premise is nonsense and the studies are bunk, at least according to Terence Hines, a professor of psychology at Pace University.

A couple of weeks ago, Hines presented a poster at the Cognitive Neuroscience Society annual meeting outlining all of the ways in which each of the six studies is flawed. Some highlights:

That is the academic equivalent of a plate-spinning roast to end all roasts.

Perhaps most problematic, counting cells is a subjective business, and the researchers performing the cell counts were not blind to which tissue was Einstein’s and which was not.

Innocent little angels who dindu nuffin.

 There were no differences in the number of neurons or the size of neurons, the study found, but Einstein’s tissue was thinner than controls.

It was stored in a basement.
Have you stored meat in a basement?

More densely packed neurons, the authors speculated, means that cell-to-cell messages travel shorter differences, which might mean faster processing speed overall. That’s quite a stretch. As Hines calls out in his poster, the finding was based on just one square millimeter of Einstein’s brain.

What’s more, the authors admit to not reporting any of the ways in which Einstein’s brain was similar to controls.

“Yes we lied but you’re an Anti-Semite or something???”

It’s like just missing the beach house off your tax returns.

They forgot guys.

Totally innocent mistake, could’ve happened to anyone who stole lumps out a celebrity’s corpse.

(This is almost as bad as the Monroe necrophiliacs story).

–In 1999, Harvey and Canadian collaborators got Einstein’s brain into one of the world’s most prestigious medical journalsThe Lancet.

Appeal to authority.

Based on old photographs

Do I have to mock this one?

I’m skipping this one.

that had been taken of Einstein’s brain before it was cut up, the researchers claimed that Einstein had an abnormal folding pattern in part of his parietal lobe, a region that has been linked to mathematical ability.

It doesn’t work like that.

They also reported that his parietal lobes were 15 percent wider, and more symmetrical, than those of control brains. Once again, though, the researchers were not blinded to which photographs showed Einstein’s brain. And though the authors were quick to make links between these supposed differences and Einstein’s mathematical prowess, Hines points out that Einstein wasn’t, in fact, a great mathematician.

Even if the statistics were sound, you’d still have the problem of attributing skills and behaviors to anatomy.

phrenology has a sound basis
especially compared to this

There’s no way to know

just the way uhuh uhuh 
they like it
uhuh uhuh

This is neurobiology, remember. Science is easy to fake out.

if X thing in Einstein’s brain made Einstein smart/dyslexic/good at math/you name it, or was just an X thing in his brain.

Dya wanna know the truth?

You’re on this site so I guess ya do.

Behaviours change the brain. This has been known forever. Read any good book and it’ll mention this. The Taxi Driver study is most famous: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17024677

There are others of the same concept

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3541490/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22814662

You can literally grow parts of your brain by being a little bit weird.

Let’s see which brain part they claimed was different, most frequently?

his parietal lobes were 15 percent wider,”

https://eocinstitute.org/meditation/10-key-brain-regions-upgraded-with-meditation-2/#codeword7

http://www.andrewnewberg.com/research/

“When we scanned the brains of Tibetan Buddhist meditators, we found decreased activity in the parietal lobe during meditation”

It makes you toothless. It’s like an evolutionary roll back.

“MRI images showed more brain matter density in the compassion, learning and memory centers in the hippocampus compared to pre-meditation scans. Interestingly, gray matter in the amygdala, a stress and anxiety center, shrank.”

[obviously something like porn couldn’t change the brain ever…]

Meditation (and prayer) literally alters your brain (but meditation is a form of prayer whatever the hippies say and the neuroscience proves it).

https://draxe.com/increase-size-your-brain/

The musical ability might’ve easily caused any brain structure differences.

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2009/04/closer-look-einsteins-brain

“The findings also suggest that Einstein’s famed love of music was reflected in the anatomy of his brain.”

“Witelson’s team found that Einstein’s parietal lobes–which are implicated in mathematical, visual, and spatial cognition–were 15% wider than normal parietal lobes. The team also found other unusual features in the parietal region, although some of these were questioned by other researchers at the time.”

And music.

“One parameter that did not explain Einstein’s mental prowess, however, was the size of his brain: At 1230 grams, it fell at the low end of average for modern humans.”

And the parietal lobe is linked with music.

e.g.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155291

Activation in the Right Inferior Parietal Lobule Reflects the Representation of Musical Structure beyond Simple Pitch Discrimination

But that doesn’t affect size, you say?

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00636/full

Structural MRI-data revealed significant volumetric differences between the brains of keyboard players, who practiced intensively and controls in right sensorimotor areas and the corticospinal tract as well as in the entorhinal cortex and the left superior parietal lobule. Moreover, they showed also larger volumes in a comparable set of regions than the less intensively practicing musicians. The structural changes in the sensory and motor systems correspond well to the behavioral results, and can be interpreted in terms of plasticity as a result of intensive motor training.

Areas of the superior parietal lobule and the entorhinal cortex might be enlarged in musicians due to their special skills in sight-playing and memorizing of scores. In conclusion, intensive and specific musical training seems to have an impact on brain structure, not only during the sensitive period of childhood but throughout life.

I know my shit.

Neuroscience isn’t that hard. Well, apparently it’s hard for the people being paid to not notice this one thing that a non-neuroscientist can notice. You can see it too, right?

One more.

He imagined tons of stuff, right? See things, bit like a schizo?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3420742/

Parietal Lobes in Schizophrenia: Do They Matter?

TLDR: what the fuck do you think.

“We want to propose that in a proportion of individuals with emerging schizophrenia structural and functional alterations may start in the PL

Too tenuous? O.K.

https://www.livescience.com/49244-imagination-reality-brain-flow-direction.html

“In doing so, the parietal lobe assembles elementary building bricks from so-called “lower-order” brain regions to create concepts, said Daniela Dentico, a researcher at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and lead author on the report.”

Thinking a lot, daydreaming, would cause the parietal cells to thicken.

“A leading theory in image processing “posits that our visual mental images are not stored somewhere in the brain, but get actively reconstructed,”

“The researchers could not determine, however, whether imagination originates in the parietal lobe. It may instead flow through the parietal lobe

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942635/

Imagination study.

“Purposeful behavior with objects and tools can be assessed in a variety of ways, including actual use, pantomimed use, and pure imagery of manipulation.”

Perhaps most damning of all, sex difference.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2680714/

“We found that women had proportionately greater gray matter volume in the parietal lobe compared to men, and this morphologic difference was disadvantageous ” (for task)

He had a brain like a chick.

Compare Einstein’s brain to another elderly Jewish fantasy-prone musician and you might have a study.

https://www.bmj.com/content/352/bmj.i969

A matched case study.

“In contrast, we found that men compared to women had proportionately greater parietal lobe surface area, and this morphologic difference was associated with a performance advantage for men on mental rotation.”

Does that mean flatter? But I’ve also seen reference to greater volume? Whatever.

Magical flip flop.

You can get that difference by playing a lot of Brain Training.

Back to the good article.

It makes me angry to think of all that was wasted in these investigations.

There was the monetary cost of the studies — money that could have been spent on work that was not doomed from the outset to fail. There was a personal cost, in that Einstein’s family was essentially strong-armed into agreeing to participate in research that Einstein explicitly did not want to participate in. And there was a public cost, too. In popular-press accounts of these studies over the years, the public was misled about the findings and their supposed scientific value.

Here’s how smart Einstein was — he understood all too well the public’s obsession with him, our obsession with celebrity and special-ness. He knew that if given the chance, scientists would pore over his brain’s neurons and glia, sulci and gyri, and make grand pronouncements about what makes a genius. And he knew it would be bullshit.

Maybe because he knew it would be average?

I do feel sorry for the guy, it’s a horror show to steal someone’s body parts and tamper with them post-mortem. He made it clear he didn’t want it, the family’s permission means nil.

Woman as Medusa

A good metaphor and one he keeps coming back to.

Except Lilith is the dominant, prevailing one in the Western culture.

He won’t mention her because it’s part of the Jewish pantheon.

And Orthodox Jews are bigger misogynists than any Muslim,

Consider that.

I’m linking to this because the “women are repulsed by the visual” post was oddly popular.

Women are attracted to masculine traits. Read: K-selected ones. An r-selected man is a coward, constantly flitting and fleeing. Other men don’t respect it, this isn’t a sexual thing you can blame on women but a defect of character. Commitment phobe is such an insult to men because it basically means deserter of your own life. They do “die” but they don’t have the stones to shoot themselves like their hero Hemingway (the male Virginia Woolf or Sylvia Plath). A man’s life is shaped by the promises he makes on his honour. They never grow up, they immediately ascertain to themselves, by themselves, their inferiority. Why would the world think otherwise?

Existing isn’t an accomplishment, the world owes these men nothing but they expect so much, impossible things. Since the world isn’t a nurturing caregiver (feminine), they take this out on the humans who embody this (women).

The immaturity of r-men is consistent across time periods and cultures. In the army, they shot them. Simply calling a spade, a spade is nothing unless you’re a narcissist with a brittle ego. Then it’s ego death and that’s why the rage, the wrath, the fronting until they’re physically confronted.

Nobody respects the schoolyard bully. Imagine he grew up but his mind and actions were the same. I suppose it’s a kind of emotional retardation. Pity is the opposite of sexy and it has its limits when dealing with adults. When they’re spiteful it goes from seeing them as a child and caring a little, to seeing them as the negative female, which, ironically, they come to embody. Nobody hates the negative feminine more than the positive feminine, the mature woman. And these guys wonder, why are all the women I attract terrible?

Like attracts like. Women won’t tolerate less than men and men won’t tolerate girlishness either. Other adults aren’t your parent but these guys always expect special treatment. Adult exchanges are based on mutuality. Sexist people are selfish around the opposite sex. They deserve to be lonely, that’s life kicking them in the teeth and trying to use the feedback to improve them.

Think of misogynists. They’re bitches, right? They manipulate women to hurt them and get their jollies. Oh, how impressive. You hurt someone who trusted you, wow. How great.

Cowardly women retreat from the game too. These are the stereotypical fish/bicycle people you can find on the social justice tag of tumblr.

Nobody talks about them. Women distance themselves from the immature of their own sex as well. How many female friends does Angelina Jolie have? ZERO.

She’s called Predator on gossip blogs!

This isn’t about men. One problem with modern men is thinking they’re special. Not everything is about men. Most things, in fact. When you think about it, this is a relief. Oh, but if they can’t get negative attention either, what would a toddler do, something with no emotional regulation ability?

That’s right, throw a tantrum.

Mantrum has become a phrase because it has been needed.

If they can’t harden themselves to a simple rejection, which women “suffer” too (it’s no big deal, really, brooding is unhealthy) then they might as well try to crawl back into their mother’s womb. Little kids are scared to talk to adults. Any time you do things in the world – apply for a job, try to make new friends, apply for a new loan, you will probably get rejected.

Maturity is knowing that’s a good thing. Nobody wastes their time.

Everybody has a right to say no and if they say yes, you know they want to be there. It’s a lovely thing.

The stories of Medusa don’t fit the misogynist’s claims very well.

Lilith fits them to a tee.

You can’t trust women.

You can’t live with women.

You can’t bond or connect with women.

Because women aren’t full human beings.

Women are scary.

Women are so scary they must be crazy.

There’s no use understanding them, the unknown is attractive but pure evil.

Definitely never have a child with a woman.

It’s a trick.

They’ll always hurt you, like your mother.

In fact, they’ll kill the babies.

ALL the babies.

They’ll do all sorts of weird sexual things with anyone. 

If they won’t fuck you, they must be fucking somebody else.

Because normal women actually fuck more than the average male porn star.

Women don’t have a nurturing instinct, ignore biology.*

They want to ruin you, they want to hurt you. 

^ see? Fits Lilith exactly.

It’s ludicrous, they make things up. Logically they contradict.

e.g. women are shallow, women date ugly. Women want money, women want not-money more than money.

Good women want a provider, a woman who thinks I need a stable job is a bitch.

I need a woman who looks a certain way, women aren’t allowed to prefer someone else.

Women always want or need a man, regardless of life situation. Men need women like a fish needs a bike.

I have no time for women, I don’t like them, why aren’t I surrounded by them? [ah, MGTOW, Reverse Psychology doesn’t work, you’re still the same person.]

It’s typical liberal irrationality. They claim mutually exclusive opposites and this is why people laugh at them.

With the deeply sexist people (the more you score, congrats), they project their own flaws e.g. the user and abuser will project it on the women he abuses, to sustain his egocentrism of being a good person. Because naturally, humans deserve to be abused….? This is where psychopathy comes in.

Narcissists especially despise anyone with standards. They failed to meet their parents, in their own mind. The higher a person’s standards, the more they will be hated.

A story about two women, one vain about her hair, or a mortal woman being raped by a God … is too much of a victim narrative to squarely align with the misogynist’s claims.

Misandrists claim the same about men, with a few additions.

There are no good men.

They are all immature.

Sweeping statements are generally stupid (lol)

This is demonstrably false but in our times, it can appear true at times.
Like how, if you keep seeking out the worst quality women, it will put off the good ones so eventually the bad side is all you see. When you have a certain amount of life experience, you’ll see people get what they deserve.

This isn’t a maybe.

People get what they deserve.

e.g. you treat people you date like shit? You’ll attract more challenging partners who will treat you even worse.

You’ll see it happen.

People-watching those people is great. Nothing will make you believe in the Bible more than watching their cosmic comeuppance over time. Who do they blame? Never the common denominator.

If someone has a sucky childhood, okay. If the rest of your life is awful, that’s all on you.

*The r-women don’t have a maternal bone.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-501284/Angelina-Jolie-My-blonde-haired-natural-daughter-Shiloh-outcast-family.html

http://canoe.com/entertainment/celebrity/angelina-jolies-daughter-shiloh-breaks-collarbone/wcm/116e1b36-339b-4142-abc4-f44280a4b5ba

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2644859/Angelina-Jolie-reveals-shes-closer-adopted-son-Maddox-genetic-children.html

https://nypost.com/2016/09/25/jolie-exposes-her-rebel-turned-saint-myth-by-trashing-pitt/

And she ended up breeding with another r.

She just wants a Nobel Peace Prize, same as Leonardo.

Put some clothes on, men!

Stop walking around in your underwear and expecting us to respect you!

You must really hate yourselves to go round looking like that.

If we treat you like dirt, you can’t really blame us. You’re indecent.

Er, that’s the historical norm, actually…

The world isn’t like America, we actually have a history.

It’s funny to watch the repressed bi guys say how pencil skirts are the instrument of Satan but get oddly wriggly when men in skinny trousers are around.

See something you like?

They wouldn’t last a month in a corset, which are easier to wear for men by far.

Well? Don’t be sloppy.

https://www.thecut.com/2015/03/yes-men-in-the-18th-century-wore-corsets.html

What, you think only women had to be shapely?

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/men-wore-corsets-and-7-other-unknown-things-about-the-world-of-jane-austen-19759433/