A Critical Review of Genius Famine’s Review

Because it’s been years since I read the book, (it actually came out in 2014-2015, moron) I’m going to ‘review’ (rip to shreds cruelly) this review. [tldr: Y’ALL NEED HBD, JESUS.]

5,000-ish words. Putting the shit into shitposting.

Because I can.

I feel I’ve lost YEARS off my life doing this, like the machine in Princess Bitchin’ Bride.

That’s its name now.

They’re bigging up Charlton because so many others (including yours truly) did first. Happy little lemmings of the online trend.
I’m happy for him and his co, Genius Famine is a solid 4-star book. It’s actually K-selection, that missing puzzle piece, a norm of religiosity is a part of it, not the other way around. Also, excess religion kills everyone. Massive hypothetical problems right there. MOVING TAYLOR SWIFTLY ON.

I need another yacht party, preserve me in Russian Standard.
http://www.vdare.com/articles/the-genius-famine-the-death-of-religion-will-lead-to-the-death-of-genius-and-the-death-of-civilization

WE NEED HARDER SCIENCES. It’s a little like porn, the soft stuff is never enough.
“intelligence is negatively correlated with genetic signs of high mutational load–such as an ‘asymmetrical’ (ugly) face”
I linked to that the other day lately, and I’m basically the ONLY person round these parts who calls it mutation load when the correct scientific nomenclature is ‘genetic load’. I thought mutation/al was more descriptive. I am one literary bitch. WHO is stealing my shit?
Naturally, the only solution to an unnatural, manmade boom is artificial eugenics. I digress. There isn’t even a bar cart in sight. It’s my inner alcoholic.
Charlton tries so sincerely to answer an HBD question with philosophy, applying religion to (a problem of) evobiology is one of the funniest things I’ve ever heard. My linking to his blog was intended as a supplement, not the substantive meal. For that, look up key HBD authors. If God himself came down on a fluffy cloud and zapped people with lightning bolts like a rock star Zeus, it still wouldn’t change the fact DNA exists and evolutionary genus have undergone speciation. If God created everything, why is any of his creation a bad thing to you? Where is your faith? Why wouldn’t He want us to understand all the incredible detail He threw into this video game? He’s got the whole world in his hands. So technically, God is cupping your balls. Respect Him.
The Industrial Revolution is fingered in A Troublesome Inheritance (uncited) but the evidence to support it is limited. Sharing the technology seems to have been the problem, the profit motive. Releasing certain technologies puts them in the hands of the low-IQ by default. This doesn’t end well, see the concepts of game theory and the arms race for further details.


There were actually two sexual revolutions before the one we know of the 1960s. Boomers are not the pivotal generation of history. The 60’s finale is the nail in the Western coffin with the Long March Through the Institutions, as the brilliant minds of the prior century finally died off.
1 – The Romantic Movement of the early 1800s. You’ve heard of it, Byron? Suddenly feelings were more important than facts and everyone realized what a special snowflake they were.
2 – The Belle Epoque and a little beforehand. The lifetime of Oscar Wilde fits it neatly. Again, the postwar generosity of K-types to struggling unfit societies in the name of God is the problem. Yes, I posit that Missions from God are demonic. When you consider everything they spawned to the outgroup is suffering – from the continued spread of leprosy, booming and starving populations, the rise of HIV, NGO child rape scandals and various tribal wars over scarce resources, the do-gooders of the 19th century killed it for the whole world of the 20th onward, who have had a dependent child in the guilt over the Third World it created ever since. Prove me wrong, internet. I know you can’t.

There’s an academic book, about 500 pages, called Pathological Altruism if you wanna know the mindset behind dumb white people who selfishly think the whole world should aspire to be Just Like Them. As if that’s possible or desirable. It’s written by a woman though, so I don’t expect it to make the same splash in this part of the internet, that constantly complains there aren’t enough women (while insulting and ignoring our contributions, bc thinking tits are terrifying).

HBD answers the concerns about inter-class fertility/fecundity, because class is rather constant based on your genome down the centuries. As in, social mobility has its limits. You can look all this stuff up in your own sweet time, you are literally online to be reading this, you’ve got no excuse.
This is forbidden science because it is predictive. The current paradigm of equalism is not.
The factors mentioned in this article precisely fit into other topics.

e.g.
Family size – time preference, present and historical age at marriage, cultural expectations, national wealth and debt. Therefore, you’d expect Western(er) fertility will NEVER rise until national debt is removed as a dysgenic pressure. Not one of you wankers boo-hooing over the future has mentioned this. Clarey got close.

Not as random as it sounds.
I say Westerner because Magic Dirt isn’t real and we don’t want to bring up fertility in the West using non-Westerners, who have their own homeland to despoil. People are not interchangeable cogs, personality is genetically heritable too! You can’t build high-trust healthy societies with people who prefer to marry their child cousins and rig elections.
DNA PROVIDES.
Luther, while based AF, not so much, on these topics.

The word dysgenic isn’t used in these conversations either. Atheism may be dyscivic but agnosticism is a human right. The Pope hates this.
Personality metrics are as important as IQ. Plenty of the world’s leaders are above-average IQ, they know what they are doing. These are the Fifth Column.
By chance alone, they couldn’t keep doing exactly the wrong thing for the People.
There are many myths about Christian fertility. If you breed beyond your ability to provide, another tenet of the religion, then all the children and the entire family die. This happens quickly or slowly, with reduced prosperity and poor marital prospects in times of K-selection, that either cause no marriage to occur, sub-standard fertility in the non-assortative pair match, excess labour and no creative production (bad for epigenetics) and/or mutation accumulation. Time preference correlates to industriousness and what we now call grit but is essentially prudence.
It’s tempting to claim Idiocracy! because listing pop culture in place of papers is part of the dumbing down you so despise but first you must understand what an Idiocracy is = r-selection.
The K-shift we are undergoing is a prelude to the Malthusian contraction of population better known as the Malthusian trap. Think the big toothy metal things in cartoons.
You cannot describe demographic patterns without the Malthusian trap.

Nobody cites the meme “demographics is destiny” when that’s obviously the topic too. If you’re trying to make the complex easy to remember for simple readers. I just use GIFs to break up the text. Evidence of too much thinking intimidates them, y’see.

Get with the clickbait times, grandpa

The best argument I have seen on the spread of upper-class genes by the death of the lower orders was the spread of Black Death. This happened in bursts that appear to correspond to social and cultural leaps. It also targeted the urban leeches.
It is not a coincidence.
The strangest regressive trend is the spread of STDs, which are not purely r-selected, since the species must reproduce in K-types too and spouses do cheat. In the era of premarital sex, they may have brought the infertility or birth-defect causing pathogens (by mutating development) into the marriage itself. Religion happens to prevent these problems e.g. no prostitution, keep celibate, it doesn’t answer them. The strongest candidate for a shift after Black Death is the probable damage caused by Syphilis. I noticed this but I haven’t found anyone to explicitly study it.
There is also the matter of atheist scientist superhero. It’s a myth of scientism. There is social pressure. Anonymously, plenty of scientists identify as non-atheist, something else. The atheism probability exists on a bell curve of one to two standard deviations; beyond this, belief in the supernatural and faith in bizarre, paranoid delusions also increases greatly.
That’s why they tend to go a bit ..loopy at the end. Especially the mathlete Olympiads.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Grothendieck

There’s a shocking lack of historical (OLD, dusty-ass) case studies (Freud did this! If Freud can do this!…) and historical or cultural asterisks on the (largely but hardly acknowledged personality) theories of Genius Famine, but the bare bones is correct.

Here’s where I go off on one.

“The emancipation of women only worsened this fall in IQ, argue Dutton and Charlton.”

There is no evidence and quite the opposite, as child IQ conforms highly to maternal IQ and there is growing evidence about the benefits of delaying motherhood, at least until after the teenage years, once the body has stabilized and ceased to grow. Men traditionally delayed fatherhood too but don’t expect parity in discussion because questioning your priors is so sissy apparently.
The suffrage was universal, as the most cursory reading of history will confirm. Women could actually vote in many places before it anyway. ‘Women’s suffrage’ is a feminist myth.
I’ve covered this and so have others, in extensive detail. Modern young woman is more conservative than the average young man and in Charlton’s own country, women now vote more conservatively than men. This is a mathematical trend you can take to the sperm bank. Calm down.

Fridge horror. Did nobody bother to look this all up?
Where is the intellectual curiosity in intellectuals these days?
You don’t just get to proclaim an opinion because of your name or its letters, or else we’d take Lena Dunham’s advice on the biology of abortion. This is called an appeal to authority, emotional children.

 

It’s also another reason I go anon. I don’t want to get attacked IRL for stating basic truths any asshole could point out with five minutes and an internet connection. You are already in the place you need to be, I’m crudely drawing a map.

“They have far fewer children than less intelligent women, who are more likely to become pregnant young and by accident”

That is a failing of the Sexual Revolution, availability and attitudes to contraception, the abandonment of fathers and all those things combined that caused the monolithic rise of the modern welfare state. These are the true culprits of the issue, not voting. Most socialists are men, for example. Cthulhu swims Left. The voting is splintered far more by race than it ever could be by sex, and not one of them has the stones to finger ‘race’ as an issue. Try studying Voting Behaviour 101. See the recent election of Trump, where white women mostly voted for him and hardly any non-white. It’s a racial composition matter.
On a finer note, I’ve yet to see a modern civilization that isn’t white in root or base. I don’t see civilization as a bad thing either, it depends what you consider Peak, a question the NRx keep bitch-slapping over, especially in the Catholic blogs, that I feel Brucey would enjoy.
It is also strange to note that they deny intelligent women exist – until it’s tempting to criticize us for our responsible breeding habits.[But if we’re irresponsible, we’re also evil single mothers? Because all conception is intentional, right? And the father will definitely marry them, huh? And finding a spouse is so easy for anyone, m/f, not-dumb? And they have magical solutions for all these conflicts of the postmodern with the biological? Without actually going into the biology of it? ] Intelligent women breed far more often than intelligent men, if you look historically. They do not. There is no comparison of the sexes upon which to make these snide remarks. They fixate on one half of a whole problem. Blame Women! as your standby is literally sexist (and stupid, these are societal issues). As would be Blame Men! be sexist, and stupid for similar, anti-natal reasons. I proffer Blame R-types, since they are exactly the problem here. It doesn’t stroke the ego but it settles the mind.

Women discuss family problems far more than men, you just don’t look for us.
Family politics is literally our domain, the home.
You don’t get to pretend this is your area. It shows. Low EQ and SQ.
Men crowd around a table and discuss money, women discuss socially.
Maybe ask mumsnet how easy raising babies is today?
IF so, why no more stay-at-home dads and let her do the ‘hard work’?

The looming factor post-IR isn’t mentioned once. The world wars were incredibly dysgenic.
The healthy and young and brave died. The cowards and feeble and corrupt remained safe and plump and sexed at home, to later provide for their children (Parental Investment Theory) and give them an advantage over war widows (the reason for our welfare state).
Draft limitations are a problem not one man has the courage to mention.

You spared the genetic detritus. Darwin is laughing at you.
Might I impose that this selective blindness is an arrogant bias, on part of a sex who wishes fully to blame the Other?
Where geniuses do breed, they do not mention the potential for dead-end mutations e.g. Goethe’s children.
I suppose they mustn’t know? That’s encouraging.

Not to mention the female germline is more stable. The male is prone to mutations, because it’s constantly regenerating. So any problems with homosexuality, for instance… yeah, that isn’t on women. Infertility in men is literally measured by their mutations. Little X-men swimmers. The superpower is schizophrenia.

The American Model of collegiate academia killed the Medieval University of Europe. Chief among the concerns is tenure. There is no sound reason for tenure, a form of academic welfare. Naturally, I expect too much for academics still in the Matrix-like system to admit this. Universities have too much money and hence waste their time. It’s affluenza on the level of an organisation. I do not expect that idea to be popular, but it is the truth. If Harvard couldn’t be left money in donations and wills, would it be so arrogant? Would the conceit spread to its founders? Why is the state teat extended to these people? They have become like the modern church, with the same problems e.g. tax exemption. The Bible says ya gotta pay taxes. The Vatican gets around this by being the State. Again, I don’t expect these problems to magically wax into focus given the bias of the writers, I have to mention it.

And someone’s going to act like it can afford to go unsaid.

“Academics contribute to this by getting funding, publishing frequently, and attending conferences.”
The social scene is poison. There, I said it. It’s populated by the midwits Vox Day complains about. They think they’re clever because they all mutually agree. Aren’t they lovely? Good in front of a camera, bad thinkers.

It is a little sexist to call the model of fault Head Girl when her role is often second to Head Boy and anyone British knows what a massive kiss-up the Head Boys are. Most of the leading academia they complain of is still generally male, so I wonder how they can square that circle…

The obedience of school is the Prussian model. It’s based on the male military complex. Before that, the rote form to teach monks. ..Were they girly too?
Boys’ schools do not magically produce geniuses on par with Tesla. Women and femininity are not the problem and assuredly not a weakness. This is a cheap, trivial argument. The problem is sub-par management, which, if you look at politics too, is decidedly male. Is the masculinity a problem? No. Gender has nothing to do with it. The people running the show are simply incompetent, due to generations of suck-ups getting promoted, largely thanks to credentialism.
I fear they may be a little intimidated by the findings that girls’ scores have exceeded boys’. Well, if we stopped grading on a curve, used a mixture of testing metrics (papers and exam because there are problems with both), in an anonymous exam condition it’s the same paper, either you know your stuff or you don’t. If we stopped grading on a curve, male grades would slip further down because they don’t care, they’re kept in education beyond vocation age (13-14). Girls are more receptive to any instruction, including education. Blame the white matter, learning is a social experience. Maybe in one-on-one tutor setups boys would do better, but good luck getting state funding for that!
Also, why do grades need to be an intersex competition? Curriculums have always been crap, you’re meant to go beyond it.
“This person will be excellent at playing the academic game and will make a great colleague. But they won’t innovate; won’t rock the boat.”
The problem there is a culture called collectivism, it is the opposite of Western individualism and dampens creativity. Snuffs it, kills it dead. It’s prevalent in Asia, not female-only spaces. You also cite a personality trait called agreeableness and another, conscientiousness. Personality types are not wrong per se, they have a place. Bad academics were hired there by other bad academics who slipped through the old net and now academia is bad. Where is the XX in this, specifically? There were all-good female colleges and still are, same with boys’. Don’t grasp for simplistic bullshit.
If you knew as many stories about Catholic boarding schools as I do, you’d know godly obedience is not the norm. Have you heard of St Trinians? If anything, the veil of religion is an excuse to misbehave, because you can just go out on Saturday and confess to a priest on Sunday and it’s all fine with The Big G by Monday.
Naturally, I don’t expect two men to know this. However, it’s their job to check.
Part of the rationale of mixed sex schools was to reduce rebellion caused by sexual frustration, by channeling it socially. It has been moderately successful, except class sizes present a new issue.
The above incompetent management issue applies to religious schools for boys as well, that also have rampant abuse (fagging), pedophilia and homosexual problems... don’t ask the ‘hard’ questions though, guys. Very manly.

“Once upon a time, they note, a ‘country vicar’ had lots of free time to research” –botany, no
You can’t build a quantum tunnel in the average English garden. Stop it. Citizen science is dead barring medical trial subjects.
Ironically, those botanical studies led to the theory of evolution. It is strange to read a man who clearly doesn’t believe in evolution, make references to biology that stands on it.
There were also scientific nuns. They do not get a look-in (ever) although they meet the criteria of being both heavily religious and scientific….
Moreover, the search for Adam and Eve led to fossil studies. It’s almost like you can’t suppress epistemic truth and this upsets idiots.

“The genius has no institution to nurture him and his potential will not be fulfilled.”
He has never needed one, he needs a shed.
Scholarly pursuits didn’t begin in the Middle Ages!

Let’s wrap this up a little.

The problems are thrice:
1. if everyone is equal, nobody is special and there’s no such thing as genius. We don’t need to worry about it or nurture it because we must deal with the dullards and dunces, who need us the most, say the low-IQ themselves, who want to feel superior to someone.
2. if geniuses can’t get credit and funding, they can’t do anything. Duh. Science has a price tag.
3. if geniuses somehow happen to succeed, society looks for any way to tear them down out of envy, from claims about mental illness (currently, autism) to political reasons or simply Tall Poppy Syndrome.

Obviously.

“But we have reached a point where our lives are so secure, and where death is so remote, that we no longer believe that our lives, or our society, has eternal significance.”
All Cultures Are Equal lies. PC censorship, yes, we know about.
Punishment of in-group preference.
I mean, these concepts aren’t hard to research.
Most exist on wikipedia, for beginners.
“Western society is selfish; the human race is damaging the Earth.”
Those are two separate points. Europe is the only continent below replacement level.
We are the only sustainable continent. No conversation on sustainability can be had until we address population. The Left thinks it owns the environment as a topic, but they’re really retaining ground so we cannot discuss this in the mainstream, public spheres (denying a platform?)…
“In addition, our high level of comfort means that the problems with which a genius may now grapple are either too theoretical to care about or too long-term to think about now.”
Lie.
“He will cause offence and question the dogmas which give us the comfort of certainty all for the sake of a problem so distant that most of us can postpone thinking about it.”
Lie. I’m sick of these sweeping statements that pretend to be scientific. You get some jumped-up upper-middle class white prick who thinks he’s the next Hitchens because he ‘cares’ about XYZ topic (right-wing virtue signalling). Hitchens read books before mouthing off. For many years. Go back to reddit if you want delusions of grandeur.
“In this context, of life not being serious, we would expect the genius to be pilloried.”
How is life less serious now for anyone paying attention? Literally how? Where is my surfboard to coast?
It’s more serious and seriously depressing than ever!
Sweeping statements!
Geniuses are not insulted, they are denied. They are disqualified so as to be ignored! The findings may as well not have happened!
The cultural message is Noblesse Oblige is dead. We don’t need you, we haz iPhones.
Unmentioned goes the fact that most illustrious scientists were members of the aristocracy. I guess Neoreaction slices a little too close to the nerves!

Academia just replicates the environment of aristocracy – badly.
Look up the story of ‘snob’.

“And geniuses are more sensitive than most.”
In themselves, yes. Externally? Have you read the stories about Newton? He was a Grade A pillock socially, a total misanthrope who neither cared about nor sought approval. It was awesome.
He was worse than House. #herogoals
But I suppose the author wants to self-identify (Hello, Millennial) with Illustrious Status Group by the convenient emotions of existence. Why? If what you’ve written in that very paragraph is true, you’d be signalling anything you could that you were anything BUT a genius, if they’re so openly reviled!
Common sense, there is not.

“Life will become harsher and simpler and, eventually, more religious.”
This is already happening with economics and I linked to Jaymans exemplary coverage of liberal fertility being a feature, not a bug.
They tend to assume all religion is good for science though, when clearly it’s just the one (Protestantism) that allows it.
Not one big Mormon scientist, is there? Catholicism literally killed people for doing maths during the Renaissance. We could be living on other planets and piloting flying cars by now if the Pope weren’t a thing (and nothing in scripture says we need one). The Bible actually says to beware of false prophets who try to replace scripture and that God wants his followers to be happy and prosperous. That would be an easier sell, huh? Human rights aren’t really negotiable if you want someone’s labour so persuasion is the trick.
“At the moment, it seems that there’s nothing we can do to stop this short of a horrendous reversion to pre-Industrial levels of child mortality.”
We won’t stop magically knowing how child-rearing has evolved, this kind of knowledge isn’t academic. It’s preserved in the matrilineal line. This is obvious.
No blackpills unless they’re real.

“But if we could better nurture genius then somebody might come up with a solution before it is too late.”
Almost sounds like the entire point of eugenics. And do you want historical reversion or progress? Biblical living standards or First World ones? Decide. Pick one.
Also, way to pass the fucking buck. You want it? You do it, prick.

These people say they’re So Smart (complete with IQ claims) …but not smart enough to get off their arse and actually do something.

Sure thing, kid. And they call us damsels.

Your armchair philosophy is gonna Save Da World.

Adults in the room, inwardly:

Why should a Feynman work for you?… There is no sane answer to this question. Rand’s stake of a point in the heart of greedy vampire societies that don’t appreciate the people who make it so good. Marx said who do you work for? Rand says WHY.
God-damn the entitlement of normies to the hard-earned property of the intellectual.
Fruits of one’s labour, a human right. Read your philosophy, child. Sowing, reaping…

It justifies the homesteading and other stuff you advocate when civilization ‘dies?’ If tribes in the middle of nowhere can acknowledge this, the higher IQ should be able to wrap our heads around.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_theory_of_property#Exclusive_ownership_and_creation
Anything less is slavery. It’s a theft of one’s LIFE-TIME.

It is evil. Bible says a man who will not work, should not eat.

Aaron Clarey has actually covered this, there is no greed, there is only theft. It’s well-known in economics that anything less than a choice is force. That’s left-wing, isn’t it? All working [no leisure, no robots] … according to his abilities…[like you can work above them?] in a kind of commune [rejects family]… that contains everyone [supranationalism, no borders, open borders]… for universalism, a value. [we call this multiculturalism, still]
A little on the theft and self-ownership angle. This isn’t egalitarianism in the modern variation that doesn’t work, it’s from humanism, originally.
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/curr-students/IB/IB-lecture-notes/ib-p7-plt-handout-1.pdf

At most, they the producer get to choose to limit it to potential consumers as they see fit – exclusive to themselves, genetic kin…not everyone. This is Polyanna stupidity, Bill Gates has kept most of his fortune and he’s meant to be the nice one. As stated above, taking things from geniuses is part of the Problem TM. No regulation, no oversight, no Nanny State. Control is part of the ownership conditions. I don’t get to decide to sell your house. They got to that point, you didn’t – they earned the right to tell you to fuck off and build your own spaceship.

Pearls of wisdom are not for the herd of swine. Nope.

“The genius will combine this very narrow intelligence with very narrow interests.”
Hahahahahaha, you’ve never met one, have you?
They take time to decide on topics and between those, they rove. See von Neumann.
Don’t believe the Hollywood trope of a man in slacks sitting in front of a blackboard screaming WHYYYYYY? at the air (or God?) and throwing balled-up pieces of paper at his coworkers who JUST. DON’T. UNDERSTAND. Like that’s *their* problem. The tortured genius is trite and over-used as a metaphor for teenage angst.

STAHP.


“He’ll also be socially awkward and eccentric.”
Define this. Everyone is a weirdo once you get to know them for a few years.
Do you mean autism?
Rain Man wasn’t autistic.
Stop.
Being.
Stupid.
Question.
Your.
Assumptions.

Priors. Whatever fancy fucking name you want. If it makes you feel clever, delta/gamma-tier.

I proceed, insulting nobody in particular.

“They tend to be useless at everyday things”
I knew. I just kneeeew the digs would come in eventually. Point three.
Do you mean all of these people are savants?
No.
And you don’t technically need to be autistic to have savant or splinter skills.

Do they look this up?

*whispers* NO.

INTELLIGENCE IS NOT A DISEASE.
DO NOT PATHOLOGISE IT.

WHY AM I YELLING.
BECAUSE IT’S THE MOST IMPORTANT POINT IN THIS CRITIQUE AND I LIKE YELLING, IT’S 5AM HERE.

If you actually want a society led by people better than you (some kind of aristocracy cmon), to care and take care of you, then don’t play into the enemy’s mind games.

“they are very fragile people and they are not usually interested in money”
Are they children? Can they not develop? Well, if you’re basing that last on the tenured….
“They need long-term security so that they do not have to worry about ordinary things, which they not interested in and are no good at.”
I feel basing this on mathematical niche SWPL men of the 20th century America is a method flaw.
Einstein is not the prototypic genius. Read more.
He became famous as a meme. The tongue meme. You know the one.

“If we can make these changes, insist Dutton and Charlton, then in spite of declining intelligence, it is possible that a genius may be produced who can develop a solution to this problem”

And I must scream.
What problem.
Define the problem.
HOW.
Use your four operational brain cells.
IF no geniuses = problem, how can we sprout one like a magic beanstalk of N-IQ?
IF intelligence is declining, surely plug the leak in the boat before you begin to bail?
IF there are geniuses, give them the media platform. Give them power. The media platform is the biggest problem because it encourages the stupid. Stop the comedies and MTV reality shit, even the ones you like you must give up America. It’s like taking a dummy from a baby, for much the same reasons.
IF academia is the problem, it isn’t geniuses then, is it? It’s the Cultural Marxist structure that is hostile to anyone that tells the truth.
IF someone had a solution, none of you would listen. That’s your own point, by the way!
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
Being lectured about degeneracy from a resident of New York.
The irony is five miles deep into Chomsky’s rectal cavity.

I quit this topic, for like… five months, until I’ve forgotten why I hate it again.

I already know the default reaction to this post, for example.

How shitposty do I have to be for you to listen to me? This is proof of what I mean, you complain everything spoonfeeds but then throw the rattle when someone dares break it down because it wasn’t how you’d do it. That’s the purpose of teaching, dumbass. You can’t yet. It wouldn’t work.

It isn’t personal, it’s societal. Not everything is about you.

Get new rhetorical strikes, please. Buy some. Get a GF pillow and a sense of humour too.
Next there’ll be a series of E-books on How to Save Western Civ and step one is grab the testes’ cream…
None of this will be glib, for we are truly the damned. How can you fix people who brag about being broken? How can you save what you can’t find? How can you cooperate with people who turn everything into a WWF match?

Old sexist adverts again – this time re men

HAPPY NOW.

A picture is worth a thousand strawmans. I’ve included ‘problematic’ implications.

ambitionpills
>Implying men are worthless without a fat wallet. Come on, we know what ambition means.
hemanvoice
>Implying bravado is the only true masculinity.
appeartaller
>Implying malnourishment (look it up) makes you less human.
artinstruction
>Implying men are useless if they do not take up an effete hobby.
marriedman
>Implying married men do no work around the house and are all lazy bums.
catchman
>Implying men are some strange hog-like creature which can be lured and trapped with fatty food.
improveface
>Implying ugly men are silly, socially clownish and don’t deserve respect.
drunkard
>Implying men are addicted, useless layabouts who need to be poisoned for the good of the family.
sexspoon
>Implying male sexuality is shameful, in your own marriage, like a schoolboy.

Pick-up scams are also old hat. There are much older ads that gave advice on how to talk, a coded phrase.
pickup1
>Implying the only thing a man cares about is women.
>Implying (all) men are desperate.
>Implying men value themselves based on how they please random people.
>Implying without sex, men are nothing.
trainyourwife
>Implying you married a dog. Who sides with an advert over their wife?
sexharmony
>Implying you’re doing sex wrong, whatever you’re doing, according to the male equivalents of spinsters, the bachelor. A random, single man knows your genitals and how to please your wife better than you do.
hypnotism
>Implying no conscious woman would willingly go out with you.
erectol
>Implying men must be ready and willing to have sex with anything at all times, like a pogo stick you can just hop on anytime the wife wants. Fuck consent, apparently.
avoidmarriage
>Implying love is a weakness, loneliness is a virtue, creepiness is male and men are users, sexual exploiters who don’t need women for anything like companionship.
gayboy
>Implying any man who takes pride in his appearance must be vain and well, gay.
millionlook
>Implying men are only valuable in marriage for their money.
magictie
>Implying a tie will keep your woman in line for when you inevitably fail to. A tie is more persuasive than you.
notopros
>Implying men are weak-willed and deviant.
learnyez
>Implying the only way to teach men anything is to beat it into them.
beatwife
>Implying domestic abuse is discipline, because a real man needs to strike a woman to lead her.
headachecap
>Implying a hat is brain food and men will buy this to be smarter. No, it literally uses the term brain-food.
manlybath
>Implying cleanliness is for sissies.
nervouspills
>Implying emotions are terrible. Feel shame.
malesedation
>Implying men need to be sedated.
husbandyouth
>Implying men are superficial and cannot appreciate personality and other invisible assets. Also, rather simple and visual, like a dog. About as much loyalty.
alonetime
>Implying a man who wants alone time is deficient in something, probably sex.
mustachetrainer
>Implying sagging mustaches are the male equivalent of sagging breasts.
meatjuice
>Implying … something about cavemen. I’m amazed that Juice Bro guy hasn’t tried to bring it back.

Roosh’s press conference, a breakdown

This will be brief but I wanted to highlight how ridiculous this is.
He thinks this makes him look good when he’s actually taking a dive like Anita Sarkeesian, he’s literally playing Victim Pro.

cool mocking shades yes peace

About as smooth as gravel.

http://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/transcript-rooshv-press-conference-6216.html

Bear in mind the AS comparison, I’ll come back to it. Rebel outsider or precious victim, you can’t be both.
Bearing in mind, he said this before, to repeat myself;

https://archive.is/oh4Zo

I can’t say I’m angry at their coverage. The reason is that there is nothing the media can do anymore to hurt me, and even if they paint me as a baby murderer, I will still gain readers because of it. When you are in an anti-fragile position, you’re immune to all manner of attacks, and so it’s the coverage alone that helps me because it gets my ideas across to those who have yet to see it.”

Ready? Here we go.
(Also if someone wants to shop his face on that chicken, please be my guest).

Roosh: All right, are you ready? Is that a yes? Oh, we have a new one. Where do you work from?

Female Reporter: Um, Martha Stewart?

Roosh: Martha Stewart?

Female Reporter: Yes.

(Laughter)

Roosh: Okay, yeah, sure. I don’t know how she got in here. Someone must have told her. All right, so first I’m going to make a statement and then you can ask me anything. Cool?

Insulting a woman for doing her job for yet another woman is an excellent way to prove you aren’t a misogynist, what a way to begin. Someone give him a speech course for the Muslim equivalent of Christmas, please.

All right, so the world has gone insane in the past week.

Gaslighting the world press. I don’t think that’s gonna work.
But yes I’m sure the whole world is at fault, not you. #whatnarcissism

Why? Number one, I had organized meet ups around the world for men to enjoy a social happy hour to meet in private and talk about anything. Work, politics, girls, just to meet.

Just to meet. Is that why all the security? Code names, really?
When you say politics, is that a yes or no to foreign sedition?
When you say girls, (and not women,) do that include tuition on how to get them into bed when otherwise they might not?

Okay? Number two, a year ago I wrote an article How to Stop Rape. This article, to a 10-year-old, was obvious that I didn’t intend to legalize rape or cause harm against women.

He sounds like he’s implying his average reader has the IQ of a 10yo. It wasn’t even his worst article, I’ve covered his degeneracy, completely serious and claiming to be truthful, and I believe the Daily Mail used that post to cherry-pick a quote, I recognized my own work.
There’s a new concept called Schrodinger’s Douchebag, they’ll say something raw and depending on the reaction, will reveal whether they were serious (and edgy) or ‘only joking’ and blame you for what they said. As in, how could you think I meant the thing I composed in my head? I don’t think that’s gonna work on… what? Millions of people? A billion? Blame-shifting only works on the type of immature girl he prizes himself on targeting.

But starting on Sunday, a lot of you have lied by saying that I am a pro-rape advocate.

That was literally the point of the article. Thought experiment or no.
You did write IN advocacy of it. And specifically rape of women, which you never philosophically justified. Philosophers still advocate their positions, even when mocking them. Read a book?
I want to pull a Diogenes and hold aloft a chicken *cough* while proclaiming;
“Behold! I’ve brought you a man.” *Roosh softly cucking*

He wants women to get hurt!

You said it would teach them a lesson. How can that possibly be misinterpreted?
He’s gonna turn into a slang term at this rate, it’ll go from douche to Roosh the Douche and eventually just Roosh.

If you think I’m being harsh, he actually said: “Bad encounters are sure to occur, but these can be learning experiences for the poorly trained woman

Is this how feminists feel all the time? Victim blaming, minimizing, speaking of women like dogs, no blame on the criminal while he’s claiming victim in his own speech.

and  “The exception for public rape is aimed at those seedy and deranged men who randomly select their rape victims on alleys and jogging trails”
…unlike those seedy enough to use pick-up? getting them too drunk to consent? drugs not out of the question?

And then the third thing, you said the meet ups are about rapists. They want to gather to learn how to rape. They are going to exchange tips. Some of you have called it a rape rally! What the hell is that? A rape rally? So because of that I’ve been all over the world in terms of the news. Over 100 articles have been written.

This is especially interesting because he didn’t actually deny it. He’s catastrophized it (for questioning his *snort* moral fibre) but he didn’t say, ‘no, I’m not going to teach them how to take sex from unwilling women.’

He needs to be very careful about this because if he keeps implying legal action and talking big, a lawsuit might be started by a larger party to get in first, setting events off, and everything about him will come out. Possibly some past rape accusations such as when he lies about his name, as he admits to doing. Pick-up might even be outlawed from a case that large, defined as hate speech as I already explained the legal precedent in seduction law and fraud.

The result is what? I’m currently the most hated man in the world.

Please.

don draper crying baby wah wah wah

You’re like those celebrities who complain when cameras follow them.
You choose the work, you choose the attention. You don’t get to pick only the positive attention, big baby. And he slags off women for being whiny victims, can we say Projection?

Governments from all over the world have talked about me. Australia has tried to keep me out.

It’s their country, entitled prick. You were saying all about the perils of immigration in other articles.

They called up their Navy to keep me out because they thought that I was going to get in through a private yacht.

Cos you said you’d go by boat, sneaky little liar. He misses out, ‘forgets’ anything that makes him look culpable.

So the Navy got called up. In England, the House of Commons debated me for half an hour to say how I’m a bad man who shouldn’t be allowed entry.

Yes, I know, I’ve been there.

dean winchester supernatural evil smirk lol laughing amused

Where do you think they got that idea? You said you hated London, you told men never to go there (we need our tourist money), after all, why should we let you back? Nobody owes you a visa. Then you go on to slag off Glasgow for having Scottish soul. Roosh makes friends wherever he goes, how he does it, nobody knows….

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/daryush-valizadeh-watch-uk-parliament-debate-banning-repulsive-us-pickup-artist-1541972
“If criminal offences have been committed – including incitement of violence against women – then the government would expect local police forces to deal with any offenders appropriately.” That’s your formal warning, FYI.
Also, the sarcastic tone to naming “Return of Kings” is because they’re slagging off a real-life monarchy. In case you didn’t catch that. You bitches write about it, we live it. GSTQ.
Are you oppressed or not? If so, you can’t be surprised the Man (the local law you PUAs keep ignoring) is keeping you down. If not, you’re a liar.

Mayors from everywhere, Canada, have said were going to keep him out (like they could anyway they are just a mayor, a mayor can’t keep someone out). The governor of Texas said the same thing. Police from everywhere said that all meetups will be monitored.

Public meetups. If you meet up IN PUBLIC, it’s a public meetup. That’s what words mean.

A private meetup for men is going to be monitored. 1984 is here.

It isn’t private. Anyone could show up. It isn’t on private property, at best rented. Land laws aren’t the same, it’s a semi-public space, so banning anyone on demo grounds is illegal. As he admitted, there is a political motive I’m sure intelligence services will be looking into, and those need to be filed and registered with the proper authorities, ahead of time. Even SJWs have to do this. You can’t go to a foreign land and expect their laws won’t apply to you…. unless you’re a Roosh.

Worst of all, my family’s address was put on the Internet through the hacking group Anonymous

Even better, give them a pitying look and smirk no matter what they say.

ah, that name again…

comes up a lot doesn’t it?

and your colleagues at the Daily Mail confirmed the doxx and say that I my mom’s meatloaf everyday.

DM is a gossip rag, as the writers will freely admit down the pub. They like ‘spoons. Nobody takes it seriously. They post on the Queen, cancer and various outrage porn. Most of the writers are preening middle-class toffs, like the Sun, which is toffs being ironic. The Guardian is toffs being hilariously serious.

Dozens of threats have come in.

Ooh, dozens. Is that more or less than AS? ZQ? Is this a competition now?
He said multiple times we shouldn’t take online bullying seriously, that the threats weren’t real so these SJWs should get over it.

Someone said that they’re going to burn my house down but save my mom. So I’m glad, but you have to understand that your work and the work of your own colleagues have incited a mob based on lies that has put my family in danger. If they get hurt right now, God forbid, it’s because of you. It’s because you didn’t read a damn article, you misinterpreted, and now we have this rage mob to where, as you can see, I had to hide this. I told you don’t tell anyone.

He’s a thirty-something year old MAN and he’s still pointing the finger and blaming other people for his fuck-ups?
Notice he doesn’t blame the victim when it might be him?

I must state right now that not a single woman has been hurt by me.

He didn’t use the r-word… odd diversion…
And the oven-worthy post proves that emphatically false.

I’ve never been accused of rape.

Give it time.

I’ve never been charged.

That’s… not the same thing…..

No follower of mine has read something by me and then gone to rape because I know if they did hurt a woman it would be all over the news. Not a single woman has been hurt.

Big talk.

Yet, there is a real rape mob somewhere and there is media from the country where that mob is. Who wants to volunteer what country has an active rape mob? What happened on New Year’s Eve in Cologne?

Typical rabbit.
You’re ganging up on me, you should feelbad! Don’t look at me, look at that guy! That other guy! Let’s you and him fight! [Roosh is a woman confirmed]
Ignore the Muslim predator writing books encouraging brown men to take Europe, country by country, calling all white women whores for these other Muslims in Europe, going country to country, calling white women whores! That makes me doing it O.K.! Right?

also, “active rape mob” – subconsciously, he’s thinking he runs the passive rape mob, who could be that overt about it but prefer trickery, and that makes it morally acceptable

Does anyone know? Someone? On New Year’s Eve mobs of men assaulted women, they raped them, and what did you guys do? You covered it up.

that was just the German Government, wrong audience, get a lesson pls

So when a real rape happens that goes against the agenda of your boss, you actually hide it. But then when no rapes happen and I try to do a meetup you lose your shit.

Nothing happened because you cancelled it, can, can he hear himself?

So I just wanted to come here just to state that not only are you guys not honest in your reporting of me but that no one has been harmed and when real harm takes place you don’t say anything. That is not right and not fair. I pray to God that nothing happens to anyone that is close to me and if it does it’s your fault. That’s my statement.

No, who started it?

Typical rabbit.

I might’ve talked shit but he punched me! I might’ve slapped him but then he hit back! Wah wah wah! I could never be the instigator!

I’m surprised he isn’t crying. You can get fake tear stuff online.

All right, is there anything else?

Reporter: Why do you think people think of you as a rapist?

Roosh: They need a target to get all the rage that the citizens have to put it on someone that doesn’t conflict with the agenda of your bosses and the ruling establishment. Roosh, go after him, it doesn’t matter if he gets hurt but we can’t go against our immigrant agenda. We can’t go against the feminist agenda. So we need to get the masses (the idiots who believe the stuff that you write) and put it on to something else. So you put it on me. I’m just a scapegoat. They are just using me.

Bear in mind what I re-quoted up top.
He asked for it.
He really wanted it.
He was gagging for it.

Yes, those are common appeals to the jury from rapists.

You know what really bothers me here? How low, how cheap, how evil, does a person have to be to use rape victims like that? For his own ‘agenda’? As a Get Out of Jail Free card? Not even that, a Criticism-Free Card.

But, I’m going to harness this. I’m going to harness all this coverage that you guys are giving me and convert it to money and women. That’s what I’m going to do. That’s the job that I have to do. I’m getting emails from a lot of girls right now and I plan (once this drama dies down if I can survive it) I may have to get in touch with them. That’s what you given me. You have made me one of the most famous men in the world. Granted, it was a lie. It was a lie. But hey, this is where we are right now so I’m going to work with what you gave me.

IF I did it……

….and he’s going to keep doing it. Officially, after this point, he deserves no empathy whoever he tries to rope in. He chooses to continue doing the same thing, and in an SJW-esque display of madness, expects a different result.

Female Reporter: Do you acknowledge that any of your writing might be genuinely offensive or upsetting to some people?

Roosh: So what?

He thinks that is a macho response. Pause. Drink it in.

American Psycho is the best satire of the 20th century

Like a little ghetto bitch.
Yeah, I called you a ho, so what? What are you gonna do about it, fight me? #seconds later# omg I can’t believe you hit me you crazy bitch!

If you make your private life public information, we’re allowed to judge. Again, you put your name, face and intimate life out there (in nauseating detail). You rejected your own legal right to privacy on those topics.

Female Reporter: Do you blame all of their reaction solely on media misinterpretation?

Roosh: I blame them for not reading what I write, for taking the mentality of a 10-year-old kid.

The ever-mature, You’re just too stupid to appreciate my genius! emo kid line.

Female Reporter: Your writing is offensive on its face.

Roosh: So what? So what? I have freedom of speech.

in AMERICA

in AMERICA

#grabs speakerphone#

IN AMERICAAAAAA.

(aka not where you wanted to hold your meetings)

Be offended, good, that means my writing got you.

3edgy5u

spot the fallacy: if you’re upset, you must be wrong

answer: non-sequitur

Female Reporter: So you acknowledge that you did provoke some of this yourself.

Roosh: I acknowledge that as a writer my job is to get attention and I did it. Right? But so what if you are offended. So what if I make fun of you? Is that we’re at right now that we can’t write things that hurt people’s feelings?

We’ve always been at that point, I wouldn’t expect you to understand. This is called the First World. It’s called etiquette and it’s the reason your ancestors came here from that Muslim shithole where gang rape is a fun family sport. How has nobody mentioned his sister? Must I do everything?

You can write whatever you want.
You can’t complain about the reaction.
Except you are. Is he borderline cos that would explain the entitlement and the constantly striving after a (neomasculine) identity.

Good, get offended, feel something, but don’t lie. Don’t lie. And that’s what you guys have done.

Don’t lie, says the guy who lies about his name.

Male Reporter: So do you consider yourself a victim in this scenario?

Roosh: You know what? No. [acts like it] I take full responsibility for everything that I have done but that doesn’t mean that I can’t state what you did wrong. [shifting the blame] I’m not saying “oh, I wish I could turn back the hands of time. I wish I didn’t write that article.” No, I wrote it. It came from my mind and it’s going to stay. But if you did something wrong then I get to  call you out on it too. Right?

He… he thinks he’s a moral authority.

scoff skarsgard

Female Reporter: So, do you have any regrets about publishing the article?

Roosh: None. None.

A man with a conscience would have mentioned his mother. I guess he ‘forgot’ to care now the topic of his own pain is off the menu and her shield status has expired.

Female Reporter: Well, you added this was a thought experiment this week. Do you regret not adding that early on?

That’s my question.

Roosh: I regret that people are so stupid that I have to put that in there right now. I never imagined that people would take that in a literal way to lie in order to push their miserable agenda. I never thought that you guys would lie about it. But now, because the masses believe the nonsense that you write, I have to treat everyone like an eight-year-old kid and say this [wait, say it? it wasn’t?] was a thought experiment even though to anyone who is not an idiot should have known that.

You should know the true meaning of what I write without me having to say, even though, as a writer, my entire purpose is clarity. He wants us to read his mind.

Expresses my feelings on this issue

Reporter: So why did you write it originally?

Roosh: Because I am a writer #slowclap# and I write things to make a point. That article was making a point about personal responsibility. That a woman’s safety is not only in the hands of men but it’s in their own hands too. That’s why. I guess that point didn’t get through, so on that account I did fail. I failed to give the point but that doesn’t mean that I did anything wrong. I did not.

#speechless#

Reporter: So a woman that got raped did something wrong.

Roosh: You know, if a woman got raped that is a sad thing. That is a bad thing.

Have you ever seen serial killers confess?
They feel the need to point out murder is bad, repeatedly, because they expect nobody else will know or remember if they don’t. That’s how out of touch this is.

But whose fault is it? #facepalming# Is it the woman fault? No, I’m not saying that. [literally just did, previous sentence] But a woman can do things to reduce the likelihood that she will get hurt. If I get a BMW car right now and I leave the key inside and I park it in a bad area and it gets robbed. Whose fault is that? Is it the thief’s fault? Or is it my fault for being a moron?

He keeps digging.
You think he’s done, but NO-

he keeps-

DIGGING.

There shouldn’t be thieves. Or rapists. That’s the moral point. You are a moron.

Reporter: It’s the thief’s fault.

Roosh: Okay, but would you advise me to leave the key in there? Of course not! Only an idiot would. So okay, so I’ll go ahead and be an idiot but don’t be mad when her car gets stolen. Just do the right things to keep yourself safe. We can’t even tell people what to do anymore to keep themselves safe? That’s weird.

By that logic, you could tell a person to do absolutely anything as long as you say it will keep them safe. Who are you to control other people? Who are you?

Reporter: When you say thought experiment, what was the thought experiment? What specifically?

Also my Q.

Roosh: The thought experiment is that if the government wasn’t completely holding the hand of adult women every step of the way and telling them that nothing you can do is wrong, maybe they would do a little bit of a better job not incapacitating themselves with alcohol and drugs and meeting random guys on the Internet that they don’t know and going to his house to watch Netflix.

You …teach men to do that. Just that. That’s literally your life’s work.
Doesn’t that make you the more responsible party?

sex with actual women mgtow infight

I think I could get laid by more women than Roosh. They certainly hit on me often enough.

Okay, and let’s hold men completely responsible for trying it on with a woman who isn’t 100% willing? Yes? No? Oh, you don’t think they’re a rapist? The Government shouldn’t completely hold the hand of adult men every step of the way and tell them nothing they do is wrong! Meeting random girls is risky! Drinking alcohol on a night out too! If you take that risk, you deserve a true/false rape accusation! For being a moron!

See how this works?

Reporter: But is this experiment just one blog post? Is it a website? Is it books?

Reporter 2: Can you just break down the lie? What I mean by that is can you break down the the crux of your article? Because some people here are unfamiliar, at least I am. I’m not from the Daily Mail.

Roosh: Can you read? I mean can you guys go. No, look guys, you want me to break it down. Read it!

The Do you even lift? of replies.

Down down down he goes…

Reporter: I mean how it got twisted by the media.

Roosh: The media said that the article said that this man wants to legalize rape. That was a lie.

WHY YOU MORON. HOW. SPECIFICALLY. REASONS. LOGIC.

Reporter: Okay, what part of your satirical argument that you’re making can you maybe understand that they took and turned it into that lie?

Roosh: Not honest. They were not honest and they knew it. The people who wrote that and said that the article is true, that that is a “pro-rape” article, they lied. That’s it. They are lying people. Most people in the media are liars.

He just keeps saying they’re liars without explaining as if that’s gonna wash.
Also, saying that to the media? Not smart. Doesn’t he call himself an entrepreneur?

Reporter: So you made a suggestion in this article which was what? Because I haven’t read it.

Roosh: Are you listening to what I’m saying, my friend? I’m telling you that I tried to make a point about personal responsibility. That’s what I did. Okay? You missed that point. Everyone here did. Some people got it. 

Is English his first language?

Reporter: Is this like a multi-year point though? You been trying to do this for like four, five, six years. What about, like, Return of Kings?

Roosh: Okay, is there an article there that you don’t like? That you got offended by?

Reporter: Well, on the front page as soon as you get there one click away it gives you a list of articles to read on “Rape Culture” Was Manufactured To Wage An Unjust War Against Men.

Roosh: Bingo.

WHYYYY.
I put myself through this so you guys don’t have to.

Reporter: The Equality Movement Is Allowing Women To Tyrannize Men. The Deregulation Of The Sexual Marketplace.

Roosh: Okay, you’re just reading headlines, man. Read the articles.

YOU WROTE THE FUCKING HEADLINES.
The outrage! The posturing! Faux brain cells!

Unless he’s admitting to writing clickbait, which makes him no better than the media he slags off.

Reporter: Is this is part of your thought experiment?

Roosh: No, these articles are making a point. [you said the same thing about the rape one] They provide evidence. [no] They provide arguments. [hella no] You’ve read it and you take from it what you want [you can’t write for toffees?] but don’t then go into your media outlet to lie about it. [you haven’t explained the lie though, still, making us doubt there was one]

Reporter: Is the satire something else?

Roosh: How to Stop Rape was a satirical article.

as opposed to…?

Reporter: Okay.

Roosh: These are not.

None of the others? Is this official? So unless tagged, serious?

Female Reporter: So, you know the outrage isn’t only about that one article. A lot of people think that you’re writing about women in general being submissive and [bad audio]. It’s also offensive.

Roosh: I don’t care. #press conference holds shakily#

Female Reporter: Is that something that you believe?

Roosh: Do I believe that a woman should submit to a man? Yes. Does that mean that my family’s address should be put online because of that? And the media should stake out their home because of what I write? No. Using these lies to incite these idiots on the Internet? No.

Wait, that is rape. That is literally the definition of rape, the physical, sexual submisson part. Yes, you do believe in rape. What does Islam mean again, to submit? Submission is not a choice or regarding of consent or human freedom, it is forced. He is trying to play traditional people with this neomasculinity crap but we know the use of the words we choose and it’s submission of a wife to her husband, as they mutually agreed in their vows, not A woman to A man, a random man she owes nothing.

No woman should submit to him because he is a bachelor, a word as insulting as spinster because they require no social respect. The command about submission only applies to married folk, and only when there is a conflict (rare), it doesn’t mean She Does Everything He Says. It means the woman backs down in the event of a dispute within the house. That’s it, a small trivial point rarely exercised. A woman is not a slave (his inner Muslim is coming out). The majority of the time they are a team, a single unit, the House against the World, such an imbalance of tyrant and slave would drive the marriage to dissolution.

Hark the entitlement goes deeper.

Reporter: What’s your justification for believing that women should be submissive? That seems to be…

Roosh: I’m not here to argue why I believe what I do. #yes# #yes you are# Okay? You have to go online, I’ve been writing for years and years, if you really care about that go do your homework. I’m just here to talk about the events of the past week.

He sounds like an omega in this. They’re spiteful and vengeful. They’ll obsess for years and plot. Reams of paper he spilled ink on these topics, it would make sense.

Reporter: I did read some of the things that you wrote and I’m curious and a lot of people here meeting you for the first time are curious to know where you…

With these rude interruptions (why are PUAs always rude little shits?), he’ll get a little dot by his name on their files.
Code Don’t Go Easy.
Keep digging, fool.

Roosh: I really think that you guys don’t read things. You see, Caitlin will write something

Note how the stupid wrong person in his examples is always female?

and you’re like “Okay, Caitlin’s article it’s getting hits so I’m going to copy and paste hers”. So it’s like a game. You guys are writing the same thing. I’m just try to understand what is happened. As you can see of been under a lot of stress [AMYG-DALA!] from all this mob that is coming after me because of the things that you wrote that don’t conform to the real world. I don’t get it. And it’s clear to me that you guys haven’t done your research. You’re ready to write that this guy is pro-rape without knowing where that false idea comes from.

Remember: rabbits project.
It’s you! It’s your fault! You’re deluded! They can’t possibly have read what I wrote because it’s impossible to disapprove of, even though I said I like offending people [above] and even if they did disapprove, I don’t care, so what? What are they gonna do, hit me?
#wait#
Stop talking about the things I wrote after I said multiple times in this very speech I enjoyed the attention!

Female Reporter: Roosh, I have a question for you from the Bang books. So I obviously have done my research and there are several instances…

Roosh: I know. She has known about me.

Female Reporter: …There are several instances in the Bang books where you recount having sex with women who were too drunk or incapacitated to consent. Now people reading that would certainly come away with the impression that you raped those women.

Man is drunk? Roosh calls it rape and backs the MRAs, bleating about ma ooman rights. The rapist must be locked up! This is evil!
Woman is drunk? Roosh calls it seduction and charges men to read about it. He must be respected in his ‘rights’ and allowed to profit and say anything Little Rooshie feels like! This is good – for men!

But he doesn’t hate women! He just treats us differently! …. Less human. That isn’t misogynistic….

#sound of flickering dictionary pages#

Here’s the definition of misogyny!

Hatred of females.
(under Hatred, this is a Psychology Dictionary)
A deep, enduring intense emotion expressing animosity, anger and hostility toward a person, group or object. Hatred is usually assumed to be characterized by a) the desire to harm or cause pain to the object of the emotion and b) feelings of pleasure from the object’s misfortunes. [rabbits’ MO, clearly we need to scan Roosh’s brain, Roosh, the guy who admits to watching rape porn]
(under Sexism)
A prejudice based on sex. …First, a prejudice is generally treated as an attitude or belief, while the term sexism generally connotes differential action and behaviour towards persons which discriminates them on the basis of their sex. Second, the term is nearly always used with respect to discrimination against females, a unitary focus that derives from the objective data of society but which unfortunately delimits the meaning of the term.

See? Completely different to what Roosh does.
Not.

Most of his articles are literally sexist. That’s why feminists mention ‘double standard’ so often, holding a double standard on the basis of sex (not some other third factor) is literally sexist. He does it all the time. As I pointed out, in that pro-rape article, he wanted not rape legalized, but specifically the rape of women. That is the very definition of sexism. Like if I said ‘men can’t be primary caregivers’ that is purely based on their sex, nothing about possible ability for the act (individual-based potential/likely ability is moot for discussion, it doesn’t matter), and marks them out, discriminates them as subject on the basis of their sex. Their demographic group. Ding ding Prejudice Lane.

Roosh: I don’t know anyone except for maybe you that thinks that [Reggie? Can we get Reggie Yates on line 1 Cheryl?] and people who have lost their minds when it comes to consensual sex. [gaslighting again oh dear]

Also, consensual sex is just sex. No need to point it out.
~coughs and points to the serial killer thing~

People who don’t have any idea what girls are doing outside right now and what they will do in an hour or two once they get drunk and pick the guy that they like and let him do whatever he wants with her. So macho sex writing, to convert that to rape takes such a leap of faith that you have to be a liar to think that’s true.

Questioning someone’s true memory of a thing you literally wrote is also gaslighting.

Could you all imply my facepalming so I needn’t type it?

Female Reporter: You literally say that they were too incapacitated to consent.
#cheering from the peanut gallery#
Roosh: Macho sex writing is not a court. It’s not a piece of evidence that you can… Maybe some things I wanted to come across as an aggressive guy. Maybe I did. But just because there doesn’t means that there is a victim out there and she suffered. Have I raped anyone? No.

wow omg likey

Actually real name/identity blog posts and published works are admissible in a court of law.
European law, at least.
And if you’re selling books as true, when you know you fudged the details, that is Passing Off and other trade infractions, including fraud…

It seems like a matter of time before he’s literally telling it to the judge. Never seen a speech this bad. None of them are even lawyers, can you imagine? They could sell the court tape, I’d buy one.

Reporter: Is that fiction?

Roosh: No. It’s not. My interpretation of it may be, but she’s just taking quotes out of context anyway.

no =/= maybe
either it’s a quote OR it’s out of context

and he’s calling them stupid?

Reporter: You made a point that you have an office that overlooks a golf course. You made that clip about speed before is that true?

Roosh: Golf course?

Reporter: Yeah.

Roosh: I have no idea what you’re talking about. Golf course?

Reporter: Yes, you have an office that overlooks a golf course.

Roosh: I don’t remember ever saying that, man.

I do not recall.

Reporter: You mentioned the immigrant agenda and the feminist agenda before. I’m trying to get a better idea of what your personal politics are.

Roosh: I would say that it’s anti-globalists which the Daily Beast represents a globalist type of platform.

You travel the world, for work, you are a globalist.

Reporter: What do you mean by globalist?

Roosh: Anything that benefits the current top 1000 men in the world in the US and Europe. You have a globalists and you have the nationalists. I would lean more towards a nationalist. Tradition, patriarchy, local solutions instead of globalization.

hahaha fuck you

Degenerate scum thinks it’s people. Pat pat.
You wish you were cool.
You didn’t wanna know before the power balance shifted. Called us all sorts of things for defending our countries, even now when we enforce our borders against the likes of you.
A Patriarchy (married men, fathers) would hang him (bachelor) in the town square for seduction and rape.
Patriarchy is not kind to men. It is cruel to bachelors and spinsters. Patriarchy is kind to traditional people who don’t ‘play’ around (ever) and spread disease (he admitted he’s failed to use condoms).

BTW You don’t deliver ‘local solutions’ by skipping the country.

Reporter: So does that mean you’re voting for?

Roosh: Donald Trump comes the closest to what I think is true.

Please let Trump ban him from the USA as a Muslim. Please. It’d be so funny. Cancel his passport one time, just to see his face.
I happen to know for a fact that Mr Trump is a delightful fellow in private, who loves women. He won’t side with you, Roosh the Douche. He is married with children. Note the rabbity technique of siding with the largest group, largest reputed male authority figure, trying to pass themselves off as One of Us? For personal protection?

#chicken noises#

Female Reporter: You express concern about your family after you were doxxed. Does that make you regret threatening to doxx reporters and protesters? Who…

Roosh: I never threatened that. I said I was going to make a list of the names and the social networking accounts. I never said I was going to share their address. That was another lie. Another lie is that I live with my mom. It’s like you guys can’t stop lying. A man can’t visit his mom? I wished I lived with her! But no, that was a lie. See now, I don’t think it’s a good idea to say it but I live somewhere in Europe.

…………………I’m guessing on a visa?

So I’m just here for a short time and I happen to be here and the Daily Mail… I have to say though they had a lens that was far away I was like what’s that over there and you see on the Internet it was right there so… There’s people outside my dad’s house now probably.

http://europe.newsweek.com/roosh-v-return-kings-meeting-422724
Literal Quote: “We must hold journalists fully accountable for their incitement.”
If the post was innocuous, why did he lock it?

Female Reporter: You own that house then right?

Roosh: No, I don’t own the house.

Female Reporter: It’s registered in your name.

Roosh: Well, I don’t know how. #cringe#

Female Reporter: So it’s not your house?

Roosh: It’s not my house. Okay let me stop that and start again. So I don’t want to stay here all night with you guys. I have other things that I have to do so were going to wrap this up at 8 o’clock. Cool?

All that talk of being liars, he sure wants to put a stop to any easy Y/N questions…

Reporter: What else has happened these last couple of days? Did you get dozens of [bad audio]. Has your phone been ringing off the hook? Or your parents’ phone?

Roosh: You know, I think from a security standpoint it’s not smart to share that kind of stuff.

Like he said about celebrity rape claims, we can’t just believe him because he said it happened. Without proof, he must be lying. We have to assume that first now. There are just too many professional victims going around trying to rentseek, sorry.

Reporter: Where do you office out of? Do you find yourself writing on the road?

Roosh: There’s a golf course that is outside of my office… No.

(Laughter)

Roosh: I’m mobile, so um. Office out of, I never heard that kind of phrase before (laughs) but Starbucks? You know?

Reporter: Can you confirm that you did have to upgrade the DDOS protection on the website after the threats?

Roosh: We already had it because my servers were attacked last year. So we already had the systems in place but they were sending 20 million false requests every hour.

Reporter: Actually 20 million?

Roosh: Yeah, that’s the actual number.

Sounds like an anon op.

This was on Tuesday. Monday and Tuesday. Once the Australian thing hit. Now I must say, when the Australia thing hit that was a lot of fun because those people were obsessed about me and I was telling them that I was to come in by boat. But then the shit kind of got real once it came here, you know? Having fun with them is good but when they announce your address and are advising people to go down that then it’s no longer fun.

What, see you in person? For your shitposting online? Right of reply?
Hey, you wanted meetups.
Someone could even say you needed to take some… ‘personal responsibility’.
The only person responsible for your safety, after all, is yourself. If someone attacks you, it might not be entirely their fault. Something you wrote might have provoked them in the same way a short skirt might provoke a rapist. That was the key takeaway message of the article, wasn’t it? That if you can’t completely ensure your physical safety, and nobody can, crime perpetrated against you is somehow your fault. Even a little?

Reporter: Would you say that media misinterpretation is the best thing that ever happened to you?

Roosh: The best and the worst. I mean what’s going to happen now? I’m going to be known, because of you, as a pro-rape advocate for the rest of my life until I die. Oh, that’s the guy that believes that all women should be raped. But at the same time they’re going to say that’s the guy. They’re going to know me. I could take a dump in a box right now and sell it because of you. So that’s what you have done to me. You have made me such a famous guy. I was a guy with the blog, just a guy with a blog, and you have taken me from here to this based on a lie. Now, I’d rather you had not done that but it happened and that is life right? So you’ve got to deal with what actually happens.

Reporter: Would you consider donating some of that money to a rape crisis center?

Roosh: (laughs) I mean I think that the fact that the entire mainstream is trying to stop rape and assault against women I think they’re doing fine. But if they want to donate money to me to help with the bodyguards that I have to hire right now then they are more than welcome to.

Wait, wait –what?

We’re meant to feel sorry for you because YOU don’t feel physically safe?
Are you fucking kidding?

I just… I can’t even. Wow. Just wow. Such irony. Much sexism. Wow.

Reporter: How many bodyguards do you have around you right now?

Roosh: Unfortunately, I can’t share that right now but you can count which guys back there are kind of large, you know?

How many are ROK readers?
Zero, because they’re all pussies.

Reporter: So what are the plans for the next couple of days?

Roosh: The next couple of days is really, probably, to get out of town since it is a little bit hot right now.

Run rabbit run rabbit
run run run…

It’s not that I really think someone is going to come and stab me but it’s not smart to stay in the city where everyone knows where I am at. So I will probably go up or down the East Coast.

Reporter: How often do you return for your mom’s meatloaf?

Roosh: I come for the meatloaf once a year for like one month. And hey, you know, I like to stay with her. I wish I could stay more. I was trying to stay for a month but now, because of this, I had to say goodbye to her.

Mommy Issues.
Hey, he calls the opposite on random women all the time, I think that’s fair.

Reporter: Have you had any trouble traveling internationally yet and you expect it?

Roosh: No. I think England did not go ahead and say that I’m banned. I don’t think Australia will let me in now.

That’s cos you cancelled beforehand. It was unnecessary.

Reporter: Do you plan on trying to go to Australia?

Roosh: I don’t see why I would go there. Yep.

Female Reporter: What does your mom think about all this?

Roosh: My mom is angry. My mom is very angry.

Female Reporter: At you?

Roosh: Not at me. At you guys. She wants me to hit you guys back. Like you don’t understand a Middle Eastern mom, they get angry. I’m having to calm her down because she wants to fight. I’m saying Mom you gotta simmer down now. But no, she said son I support you, do what you gotta do, this is a matter of your speech and as long as you’re not doing anything illegal.

His mother is more of a man than he’ll ever be.
Not a good man, supporting that, but still.
When it comes out he’s done something illegal (over so many years there must be something that sticks) I wonder what she’ll do.

Reporter: What does she think of your treatment of women?

Roosh: Treatment of women? My mom doesn’t know. My mom doesn’t know how I make love to this girl or that girl. [but you film it] She knows who I am. She knows that whatever I write on the Internet and the monster that you have made me there that I have never hurt a woman. [no she explicitly said she supports you AS LONG AS you aren’t a criminal, there’s a catch] You would think by now, guys, that one girl would come forward and say “Yeah, Roosh did it, he raped me”.

Is he seriously tempting fate that hard?

One, you would think. Not one has come forward. Not one. Even though I have been known everywhere. So how do you explain that? Not one.

He seems to be implying that rape doesn’t count unless it’s recorded.
As if plenty don’t go to the police for whatever reason. They can still come out later.
#coughs Bill Clinton, Bill Bill Clinton Bill#
Just because you’ve been alright so far doesn’t mean you’ve got away with it.

It is weird how a lie can get to this point in time. So I’m not sure what the function of the media is because if you’re just going to lie and when the public is really in threat like in Germany was. Women in Germany right now are in threat. You don’t protect them but you come against me, what are you doing?

Reporter: The media cover that pretty extensively. I can email you a bunch of… (offers proof)

Roosh: After the outrage came. From day one? No.

Reporter: That is absolutely not true.

Reporter is correct. Roosh is lying. The media is covering it plenty, actually.
Previously, they were blocked by politicians in the EU, because it was an ongoing case and they didn’t want the illegals to disappear and skip to another country, that wasn’t the media per se. Blame Schengen.

Reporter: Back to what Caitlin was saying earlier, do you at least agree that, legally speaking, the technical legal definition that a woman is too drunk to consent to sex and you have sex with her, that is legally defined as rape. Can you at least…

Roosh: How about the man? If the man is drunk, can he consent to rape? [impossible]

Reporter: We can talk about that in a moment.

Roosh: No, no. It’s the same thing.

If it’s the same thing, and drunk men are categorically raped, then yes, you did rape them, the drunk women.

Reporter: No, no, no, you’re not answering the question.

Roosh: You’re not going to tell me what is right and wrong.

Spoken like a true psychopath. Indignation over questioning their morality, because they have none, so they won’t be able to explain it (like how he couldn’t explain the supposed lie).
They don’t actually know, that’s the joke. They change it, verbally, as they need to manipulate people.

Reporter: Okay, woman, man, whatever, that is a legal definition of rape. Do you disagree with the legal definition of rape?

Roosh: If a man is drunk and a woman has sex with him is it rape?

Reporter: Yes.

Female Reporter: It is not the legal definition of rape in many places though.

Reporter: In many places no…

Roosh: You’re trying to redefine the definition of consensual sex so that every man is on the hook for rape. That is what you’re trying to do. So no, I don’t agree with you.

No, the example was a female rapist.
He’s trying so hard to be a psychopath with this I’m gonna say borderline again, they idolize psychos.
Apparently drunk men are fair game to him from now on. So hey, let’s wait until he’s drunk and pay a really fat feminist to sleep with him. Come on, it’ll be funny. We can film it (since he also advocates that every time a man has sex) and split the royalties.

Reporter: Do you believe Bill Cosby is a rapist?

Roosh: I haven’t seen all of the evidence but I think that it’s weird that 20 years after… [that’s a No despite drugging them, hmmm…, will anyone ask if he’s handled drugs?]

Reporter: If any of these women came back and said “Oh, Roosh did whatever”, here is somebody with a long history of…

Roosh: The evidence that I have seen is girls wanted to be with him and take drugs with him, and then 20 years after that say that he hurt them.

No, they didn’t want to, that’s why he slipped it in their drink.
Deception.
And why would they want to take drugs that make them unconscious? Out cold? With no memory? Drugs a rapist would use, that give no thrill to the victim? And why would he wait for sex until they were out cold?

The Muslim genes express themselves eventually, don’t they?
He literally doesn’t see the problem. He is blind to it. He cannot see, like Bill’s victims after the coffee.

Reporter: So you don’t agree that that is a legal definition of rape?

Roosh: I don’t think that they are being honest.

That was a yes or no question. He’s being evasive at his own gig.

Reporter: If they were?

Roosh: If they were, look man I’m not a lawyer. See this is where we are right now where the mainstream is so obsessed about rape. [no you chose the topic to write that article] We don’t even know what consensual sex [just sex, it isn’t sex without consent, it’s rape] is anymore. This is what we have done. [sharing the blame? no that fails] So no you’re coming after me for an article where, clearly, I didn’t intend for people to think that I want all rape to be legal. [no not all rape, just rape of all women] So we’ve lost our minds. [gaslighting] From now on about sex, the United States is just gone. [then revoke your citizenship] We don’t know what sex is anymore. We don’t know what consensual sex is anymore and that’s because of the work that you have done.

Normal people with a healthy conscience know what consent is.
They have never required the media to inform them.

Reporter: How did this become your issue? We all have different issues we care about passionately, how did this become yours?

Roosh: It’s not my issue. I’ve written over 3000 articles and maybe 10 of them were about rape.

Yes, like “How Women Train Men to Rape“.
And, remember that serial killer confession point again?
How could I forget “Six Reasons You Should Not Rape A Girl.
Hint: None of them are ‘because it’s evil‘.

His #1 reason? It hurts your penis. …How would he know?
He goes on to list “Hypothetical reversals” for when it’s acceptable. No really.
#2 Self-exposure to STDs. #wait for it#
#3 Prison (being caught)
#4 Child support (I am not making this up)
#5 Hookers are easier.
“Hypothetical reversal: You want to experience the rush that comes from committing a felony.” He sounds experienced.
#6 Finding a slut and tricking her into bed is easier (and presumably not rape in his twisted mind).
Considering all the blather about drunk women, consider this finishing paragraph.
“If you’re reading this right now, it’s safe to assume you already have the morals that prevent you from becoming physically violent against a woman, but for the man who has been raised by lions, I hope this list helps him understand the self-harm of committing such a horrible act. As long as you don’t confuse violent rape with the legal act of sleeping with a promiscuous girl that’s as intoxicated as you, you should be okay.”

Crazy people think if something isn’t explicitly on the lawbooks, it’s okay. That it’s moral, in fact. That is their damage.

And as for Roosh’s personal blog, we all know he typed this gem with his own two hands.

rooshvrapistdrunk

Roosh: “During sex, all the power belongs to the male… She doesn’t care about equality, or protecting women from men like me; she just deeply resents the fact that sex is where men completely dominate.”
Other people have been quoting him too.
https://daryushvalizadeh.wordpress.com/
In the UK at least, this is illegal.
https://daryushvalizadeh.wordpress.com/2015/07/21/roosh-explains-how-he-gets-always-unprotected-raw-sex-no-matter-if-she-insisted-for-condom/
This is rape. Consent is conditional, as I have explained before and cited the relevant statute. If a woman says ‘with a condom’, it isn’t a negotiation. There is no compromise. It’s either sex or rape.
“Roosh explains that he lies about his STDs, and that all the men should lie about their STDs or if they were ever tested, this way assuring that raw unprotected sex will happen.”
Also rape, and criminal charges like ABH may be placed (Actual Bodily Harm) for knowingly passing on a venereal disease.
Roosh: “I’ve had several girls insert my beautiful naked cock inside them while chanting “Get a condom !”
“Girls are supposedly the more intuitive of our species, but if so many feel right about fucking me without a condom, then I must conclude that they don’t know shit. They’re all dirty little whores who truly disgust me with their sex habits. I don’t care if she’s a lawyer, government worker, or environmentalist—if she lives in a metropolitan city and fucked you by the third date, she’s a bucket of disease”

Hey, he wanted us to go read his stuff, I’m obliging.

Do you think he’ll ever look in the mirror one day and hate himself? I don’t.

Reporter: [bad audio] (starting to doubt this transcript is honest)

Roosh: Because when I was in college I want to learn how to make love to every attractive girl that I saw. [whatever their wishes] So I needed to learn which skills that I had to do. Is there anyone that I have not called on yet because I’m trying to think of who is kind of quite. Why are you guys here then?

Reporter: Martha Stewart over there.

(Laughter)

Female Reporter: Um, are you happy?

(Laughter)

Roosh: That’s why we didn’t call on her. I mean happiness is what? Am I happy that people have the wrong impression of who I am? No! But am I happy that I’m probably going to cash in on this as long as I can survive the next couple days? Hey, you gave it to me, you gave me a package and now I will run with it. You can’t turn the clock back. [famous last words]

Reporter: How much have you made off of this in total?

Roosh: You know I have to get my accountant to really tally it. Has sales of books gone up? Yes. Has advertising sales gone up? Yes.

Reporter: What is your vision for the future for male-female relations?

Roosh: (laughs) Okay, well, what I’ve been trying to show on my website is that equality doesn’t work. I mean it doesn’t. If we have a divorce rate that is 50% or more, it doesn’t work. [most of those are 2nd, 3rd… divorces, many by men] I think we have to go back to the days where the man leads the household. [you don’t have a household, your opinion is invalid] I think that’s the only way. But are we in the US? I don’t think so. I think there’s a couple of countries left where we can, maybe in Eastern Europe. The Muslim countries… You guys love Islam so I’m thinking that you guys would love… You guys give it a pass. They have a patriarchal system in the household. Do you get on them for that? In an Islamic marriage, there are some Muslim guys here, rape cannot happen during a marriage. Do you write about that? No.

Reporter: Yes.

Roosh: No you don’t.

Reporter: Yeah we do. I’ll send you a bunch of links on that.

He keeps lying, it’s so sad.

Roosh: Please do, please do. And I’m going to read them carefully. But you guys give it a pass, you guys give Islam a pass for a patriarchal model that I write about but you come after me. Can we get something over here?

Female Reporter: She’s just my photographer.

Roosh: (Sighs)

Female Reporter: I am mostly here just to listen. Everyone else has mostly covered all the questions that I would’ve asked so.

Roosh: Ask anything.

Female Reporter: Why did you pick this hotel?

Roosh: I used to actually come here on dates. I used to bring dates here. This was back in 2000s. This was a place where I used to bring a date. We would sit on a couch upstairs and I would make my smooth moves on them here. This was 2005, 2006.

Reporter: Just to clarify something earlier, you were saying that Donald Trump was the closest. Besides the anti-PC stuff, what do you like about his 2016 campaign?

Roosh: He hates you guys too.

Reporter: Besides that.

Roosh: That’s enough for me. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Reporter: The media is not a political ideological position.

Roosh: Becoming anti-establishment is. You don’t understand, half you will be out of a job within five years time. [also, wow]

Post-collapse, bloggers will starve. You have no other skills. You’re a parasite
(I don’t monetize because of this, giving me time to do useful things, this is a hobby).

Reporter: So you like that he is nationalist and anti-establishment.

Roosh: And the reason is you’re not serving the needs of the public. You’re not. The establishment sites are losing views and I’m sure a lot of you have not seen your salaries increase in the way that you wanted. It’s because we don’t believe in the mainstream anymore. In this case, what you did to me is now showing the world what you guys do and how you operate.

They’ve been asking reasonable questions, douche.

Reporter: I didn’t do anything to you…

Female Reporter: Why did you end up canceling all the meetings? Because a lot of them weren’t going to be protested right?

Roosh: A lot of them were. I would say at least half of them. This news made it to Russia.

Female Reporter: [bad audio]

Roosh: Who said they’re not? You know, a mistake that I made was saying lets let these masculine, strong men organize, who hate the government, probably, and meet. That was kinda dumb. Because this could be a threat against us. So if we have to go underground, I’ll go underground. We never had a goal where we had to do everything in public.

Sounds like a terror cell.
Is he going to join Islamic State next? Full terrorist final form? He already praised their system where they kill, rape and starve little girls. They’d be dead by now without Western aid.

Reporter: If you and the people who follow your website closely are so strong, why do it in secret?

Roosh: Are you going to go to a meeting where the cops are on you?

As if the secret police are going to announce they’re secret police, goddamn.

snort lol laugh haha hmph derision yeah duh really uhuh mhmm princess bride

If MI5 doesn’t already have a UK agent on this under deep cover I’ll eat my hat. This cheeky Robin Hood number.
Isn’t he proud of his ideas? #chicken noise# Dare you to get a soapbox in London, it has plenty of Muslims.

Reporter: I have before. [this is a specimen Roosh is unacquainted with, a man with balls]

Roosh: I don’t like this guy. I mean he’s just being argumentative. #CHICKEN NOISE INTENSIFIES#

Female Reporter: Was there supposed to be a public component at all to these meetings?

Roosh: No, it was just the most efficient way to organize people who like me and who like my site. Hey guys, just meet here at this time.

Female Reporter: They were not planning on doing anything there. They were just going to hang out, right?

Roosh: No, okay, I’m going to tell you. There were going to meet at that point and say where’s the Pet Shop? It’s right here. Okay, hey cool, what your name? Where are you from? There’s a bar over here let’s go for a drink. That was it! That was it and then the worldwide anger came.

and discuss what? a bar is public so… if we recorded you, that would be alright?

Reporter: But again if they’re strong, masculine, brave, why the subterfuge? #slowclap#

Roosh: Because you have angered a mob that wants to disrupt their meeting because you have gotten governments against them by lying about their intention.

Why not prove them wrong by showing up and being peaceable? Unless you didn’t want to be peaceable. Rabbits are such cowards. Yes, run along. Run along. You were called out and exposed, you got burned.

Now the world thinks that they’re going to meet to rape people. So why are they going to meet now? Do you think it’s smart to go and meet now? After that? You would go to a meeting where everyone is targeting you as a potential person who is going to rape. That’s what you would do? Of course not! You don’t seem like the type that would stand up to someone who is coming against you. I mean, do you lift? You don’t lift.

What, I was kidding above, I didn’t think-

Reporter: No, I don’t.

Roosh: I do lift but I lost some weight.

david tennant 10 lol laughing cracking up

They're so stupid it's a laughriot

laughing rdj crack up

I’m just saying, like, this guy is saying go into the fire. Who is going to do that?

A MAN.

A male with conviction and honour.

That’s absurd! This is where all these absurd ideas come from, from you guys. It doesn’t make any sense! It doesn’t make any sense. (sighs) So we got five more minutes.

Reporter: Do you feel that leaving town or having bodyguards takes away from your masculinity?

#wheezes#

#dying of laughter#

Roosh: No! If your life is in danger, no. [it isn’t, are SJWs a true physical threat or not?] If you want to stand up and fight and get into a confrontation, that’s fine, but right now the heat is on my mom and dad so me leaving is going to take the heat away. [no nobody threatened them] So I am considering them in the actions that I do. Last summer I had two speeches in Montréal and Toronto and the same anger came. What did I do? I stood there.

[You ran like a little bitch, turned and flipped them off from behind bodyguards and a closed door, it’s on camera. I saw the footage.]

Why? Because my family was not in danger. They didn’t post their address. For the record, I held the speeches even though the mayors came out against me but now it’s not worth a public happy hour to go against the police, governors, mayors, and all that stuff and put the safety and privacy of the men who follow me… I can’t toss them into that. [hey at least they won’t be raped] I can toss myself into that. [yeah] I can hire a bodyguard. [no, then you’re risking the bodyguard] I can go out right now and drink (which I will) but I’m not going to put them in danger. [If it came down a choice of Them or You, you would though, wouldn’t you? r-type scum, no loyalty] That would be like just looking out for me instead of the men who trust the things that I do.

I think he cancelled because HE didn’t wanna show up.

Female Reporter: How many men would you say those are?

Roosh: It’s hard to say, but based on the site traffic that I get for Return of Kings, I get one million uniques each month. Out of the hard-core people who really follow me it could be as high as 200,000.

Forum stats are much lower and more accurate. Lies.

Female Reporter: And how many of them were you expecting to go to these meetups around the world?

Roosh: There’s no way to know because it was just show up. Okay, so we got time for one more.

There’s no way to know because you **cancelled**.

Reporter: How many women have you been with?

Roosh: (sighs) A lot. I have been with a lot, but that’s not relevant to the current matter at hand. But thank you. Thank you all for coming. I expect more lies in your articles that are going to come up but I just wanted to do this to show what the truth is. Okay? So have a good night.

He counts notches (ew) but refuses to state a number?
Yeah, he’s lying, it’s much lower than people expect.
I heard a really good joke that he’s probably a virgin. I wish it was funny but I refuse to laugh at female pain.

Sorry, up top I assumed this would be brief but the Questions took up a lot of time and I had good material.

Why are universities blocking formation of men’s societies?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11670138/Why-are-our-universities-blocking-mens-societies.html

Sexism? Sue.

A male Durham University student was so moved by the suicide of a close male friend that he felt compelled to start a society for other men who may need support – only to find it blocked by the Student Union this week for being too “controversial”.

poor dear (not sarcasm for once)

When Adam Frost, 21, a third-year Italian and French student, proposed the Durham University Male Human Rights Society, he was ridiculed on campus, with remarks such as “Isn’t this a bit like starting a society for white people’s rights?”
oh no oh dear hides facepalm double
Why not do that too?
Don’t white people have rights anymore?
The Equality Act says it IS possible to discriminate against white people, I fucking read it.
The SJWs seem to think you can ONLY support your group if you play a Victim Card, whether or not you have one – untrue. You can start a group to further your interests on nothing, with no cause at all. Don’t buy into ANY of their frame.
Adam told me: “Last October, a friend who was depressed reached out to me, but I didn’t know what to say. I tried to help, but two weeks later I found out he’d killed himself. That hit me hard. I started looking into male suicide and found some shocking statistics. The reason behind that is that male depression isn’t taken seriously – we’re supposed to just ‘man up’ and deal with it. Men are ridiculed.

Which group ridicules men?

“It’s incredible how much stigma there is against male weakness. Men’s issues are deemed unimportant, so I decided to start a society.

Fair.

“But it was rejected by [Durham’s] Societies Committee; they said it was ‘controversial’ – and that my aims were ‘too similar to those of Fem Soc [Feminist Society]’. That’s just not true. They told me I could have a men’s group, but only if it was a branch of the Fem Soc, which struck me as unacceptable.

No boy’s clubs allowed. Start one off campus, I found out some time back the rules usually only apply to communal campus space. Then find a no-win no-fee lawyer and go to town. On proceeds (because you WILL win) fund the group’s space.

“To show why, I went through the Fem Soc policy documents, where it specifically says, ‘Feminism exists for women’ and ‘it would be extremely unreasonable to expect this space to support and cater for the needs of men’…..

Men are the enemy.

Tweet Emma Watson for her opinion, with a picture of the “Feminism exists for women” document. I am 100% completely serious. The bitch can’t deny you the opportunity for your own space, since she tried that UN BS. When even she ignores you, you have certifiable proof they’re all like that.

Seinfeld: PC students don’t know what they’re talking about

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/comedy/comedy-news/11659812/Jerry-Seinfeld-Politically-correct-students-dont-know-what-theyre-talking-about.html

Jerry Seinfeld has ruled out playing university audiences because they are too politically correct – and he counts the entire younger generation in that.

While Seinfeld was promoting his internet show Comedians In Cars Getting Coffee on a sports radio show, DJ Colin Cowherd said that Chris Rock and other comics steered clear of student audiences because of political correctness.

Seinfeld said, “I hear that all the time. I don’t play colleges but I hear a lot of people telling me they’re so PC.”

When asked if political correctness hurt comedy, Seinfeld replied, “Yes it does.”

He added that comedians like Louis CK, whose Saturday Night Live monologue about paedophilia and racism caused something of a stir last month, avoided problems because he “doesn’t care”.

“Everybody has their hot zone. Their heat map. Those are the jokes you do. For me, I talk about the subjects I talk about because for some reason, I can make them funny.”

Seinfeld described his 14-year-old daughter saying that her mother’s suggestion she might one day spend time with boys on weekends was “sexist”.

“They just want to use these words,” he said. “‘That’s racist. That’s sexist. That’s prejudice.’ They don’t know what the [bleep] they’re talking about.”

what was the first PC term?
Using Jew as an insult or verb, wasn’t it?