Europhiles love a predator

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-51133850

“By no stretch of the imagination could a contemporary author write so blithely of his seduction of underage girls – and, in Matzneff’s case, of boys too.”

Oh, like that’s worse? Because he also raped boys?

Seduction isn’t Hollywood, that’s a lie. By definition, seduction is against that person’s individual (legal) will and consent, and seduction is still illegal under common law for many reasons, especially of children.
Paedophiles have tried to normalise everything but a fetish to children and only to children is sadistic, they wish to harm and corrupt. That’s the process of evil.

“And even if he did, there would certainly be no-one leaping to his defence, accusing his detractors – like they accused Bombardier 30 years ago – of reactionary neo-Puritanism and failing to understand the wellsprings of teenage sexuality.”

I’m sure there’d be some Muslims in pick-up, somewhere, that’s the re-brand attempt.
It’s disgusting some Westerners try to justify these attacks, knowing the child outcomes of child abuse (mental problems, addictions, suicide, pair bonding issues as an adult, trauma and PTSD). Worse, they say it’s ‘culture’ if the predator is white but apparently a Muslim is so foreign. You can’t pick and choose pedos.

The real rape culture is the ‘free love’ left-wing ‘culture’ that assumes everyone is “up for it”, even children. But what was the kid WEARING when they were raped type of victim blaming. In the First World, we can show skin without some subhuman trying to absolve themselves from their actions with a convenient ‘loss’ of control, ‘loss’ of agency.

Bring back hanging for rapists, it’s very simple. They’ll magically find their impulse control if not enabled by victim culture that sees the scum of the earth as a ‘slave’ to their libido (who isn’t? deal like everyone else) who ‘can’t help’ (can’t resist) attacking. Let children and women defend themselves, they lack the physical strength to do it without weapons. Re-open the asylums if the poor, pitiful, woe-is-me predators can’t function in society, this is why we have so many now. They closed the asylums to normalise this.

Most predators are serial offenders, it’s a tiny group of pedos doing this.

There’s the telling projection of ‘fun’, pedos do find getting away with it ‘fun’ and try to groom victims to agree, to normalise.

“And yet just a generation ago, evidently, the idea of sex between adult men and adolescent girls was not only not shocking – in “enlightened” circles, that is. More than that, it was seen as liberating for the youngsters themselves – a final casting off of the sexual bonds imposed by the old pre-1968 order.”

The Kinsey data was forged, he was a sadist pedo into teen boys and eventually fired for it.

“Gradually his star faded. There was growing distaste for his sexual predilections, and before this latest controversy he was an all-but-forgotten figure outside the Left Bank.

But in 2020 the moral compass had shifted 180 degrees. What had been seduction was now abuse.”

It always was, it’s even in the law, from breach of promise to criminal conversation. Hollywood lies should not be treated as real. Hollywood has imposed a fake norm on us, glamourising predation, what we see now is Power to the People, from the internet.

Hell, they’re still making films that glamourise child rape e.g. A Bigger Splash. 2015?

Memoryholed:

https://worldhistoryproject.org/1938/frank-sinatra-is-arrested

“Frank Sinatra was arrested in 1938 on charges of adultery and seduction. Yes, they used to be able to arrest people and charge them with seduction, something that faced a 23-year-old Frank Sinatra.”

You want traditionalism? A high trust society? Re-instate the charges or the West shall perish.
It’s now called “grooming”, who could ever possibly agree with legally permitting grooming? 

Protect women and children or the future is done for.

It’s a return to history the cuckservatives are too blue-pilled to ever suggest. What if it’s their daughter, their son? Their wife being accosted when they’re away at war? You can’t be around all the time, there must be legal recourse.

“What Matzneff saw as a celebration of sexual adventure with partners who, though young, were always consenting, had become an evil power game.”

No, they groom them, BBC. Children CANNOT consent, but psychologically abusing anyone would vitiate the ‘consent’, legally.

You can tell the BBC covers for pedos by pretending the victims are ‘up for it’.

Again, the laws pre-dated this for good reason, it was pro-social to protect children, boys and girls.

“And when publishing executive Vanessa Springora brought out a book this month describing the traumatic effects of her own relationship – aged 14 – with Matzneff, it was clear that he was now a literary non-person.”

Pedos lie, shocker. Predators lie about their victims.

They also lie to their victims – lovebombing, gaslighting, future faking (specifically covered under breach of promise) – things previously covered under seduction, now euphemistically called “grooming” (PC term, grooming for rape aka seduction). Coercion isn’t legal, whatever you do it for.

“In France the age of “sexual majority” is 15. If an adult has sex with a person under 15 he or she will face prosecution, though not necessarily for rape.”

Then why can’t they vote at 15? They don’t really consider them mentally able, which says it all.

France was over long before they invited the Muslim pedos. Actually, that’s why they invited the Muslim pedos.

Pedos like other pedos.

“At the age of 14 you are not supposed to have a 50-year-old man waiting for you when you come out of school; nor to share a hotel room with him and find yourself in his bed… when you should be having your tea,” writes Springora in Consent.”

Huge age gaps should be outlawed anyway, it always predicts some form of abuse beyond a solid generation (25-30 years or so). When one party’s brain hasn’t finished developing, we have no scientific reason to allow people under 25 to “date” whoever they want, the parents also dropped the moral ball and should be ashamed socially as enabling the rape of their child.

“The other people in his “seductions” also existed and their story is now being told.”
Pedos lie, they’re predators. If they’ll rape a child, boy or girl, why not lie about it?

This is like thinking murderers will obey gun laws.

Age of consent must be majority, sex is medical. Minimum age to marry must match as well, especially in a Catholic country, otherwise this is such a convenient oversight for the Weinsteins.

Europhilia is pedophilia with more wine.
Pushing the culture of places with dehumanising ages of consent, despite their claimed Catholic relgious background, is very telling.

France isn’t losing money on tourism because of Muslims, but the white, French men acting like brutes. It’s been losing money for decades thanks to the Boomer generation of degenerate losers. They’re stalking teenage girls (and pre-teens) and young women, shouting obscenities at them, trying to rub up against them on trains, publicly exposing themselves for public urination like a dog and flashing when a girl clearly just wants to go shopping.
The West needs to get its adult men in order, police to a first world standard already.
The Boomers who enabled this in media and TV should be up on charges of aiding and abetting trafficking, because a steady supply of groomed teenagers doesn’t just happen.

The stories of solicitation of women/girls also require punishment, there’s no such thing as ‘pick-up’, it’s solicitation.
Free love is free license to rapists and harassment, stalking, lying to get in a woman’s house are not uncommon. Psychiatrists know about these tactics. To catch a predator. The West needs to stop making excuses the predatory scum use to harm children, in particular.

Video: Criminal rape victim

Justice is dead, isn’t it?

The “feminists” don’t care.

The police and politicians are in on it.

So much for “hate crimes”, isn’t it?

But “age of consent” has nothing to do with rape, you weirdo. They don’t become non-victims aged 16-18, the pedos are pushing it as “underage sex” – no, it’s child rape. We already have a term, don’t use the Marxist rhetoric.

Pedos self-expose eventually

They have a Common Purpose.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/462604/We-can-t-prove-sex-with-children-does-them-harm-says-Labour-linked-NCCL

Apparently decades of observed mental illness, substance abuse, attachment disorder, later divorce, the cycle of abuse with their own children, trauma including PTSD and high suicide rates don’t count as ‘harm’.

Apparently they need to spontaneously combust.

in context

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/11/labour-bought-data-on-more-than-1m-mums-and-their-children-emmas-diary

that one went down the memory-hole… put it back

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/politics/outrage-as-yorkshire-vicar-calls-lgbti-lessons-state-sponsored-child-abuse-1-9812091

Rapist nanny state, called it.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/06/01/one-cult-to-rule-them-all-one-cult-to-find-them/

Sex Ed is grooming, people. Sexualisation of minors is grooming.

In full, top article:

“PIE members were lobbying NCCL officials for the age of consent to be reduced and campaigning for “paedophile love”.

reduced to zero

campaign for sweetest spot on a stake

Their view that children were not harmed by having sex with adults appears to have been adopted by those at the top of the civil liberties group.

Today we publish extracts from an NCCL report written for the Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1976 when Mrs Hewitt was general secretary.

It says: “Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offence. As the age of consent is arbitrary, we propose an overlap of two years on either side of 14.

They’re already prosecuting like this in cases by the CPS.
Minors can’t cry rape because their rapist is claiming willing.

And gets away with it. Look at the law.

Sick world.

‘Rape gangs’ are actually sex slave owners. It’s slavery.

(Pedo rings are just one form of sex slavery.)

Actually, consent documents would be a good idea but it’s called a marriage certificate.

‘Consent’ is a will o’ wisp for predators.

“Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage.

“The Criminal Law Commission should be prepared to accept the evidence from follow-up research on child ‘victims’ which show there is little subsequent effect after a child has been ‘molested’.

Gaslighting, victim blaming.

“The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage.

Sexual predator says its teeth aren’t sharp.

“The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and paedophile.”

Justice is dead.

Mrs Hewitt, 65, was general secretary between 1974 and 1983. After days of intense pressure, the former Labour MP for Leicester West finally admitted last week the NCCL was “naive and wrong” over its ties to PIE.

Sure. Save the hive.

She said: “Any suggestion that I supported or condoned the vile crimes of child abusers is completely untrue.

Er….

“As the NCCL archives demonstrate, I consistently distinguished between consenting relationships between homosexual men, on the one hand, and the abuse of children on the other.

men, not minors

and plenty of men are raped regardless

“When Jack Dromey, as NCCL chairman in 1976, vigorously opposed PIE at the NCCL AGM, he did so with the full support of the executive committee and myself as general secretary.”

However Labour MP Dromey’s opposition to PIE has been questioned by its former chairman, convicted paedophile Tom O’Carroll, who claims he felt “welcome” at NCCL meetings where he sat on the gay rights sub-committee.

Now they’re teaching it in primary schools!

Step by step instruction.

Mr O’Carroll said: “While they did not like PIE and did nothing to support our objectives, they were afraid of appearing insufficiently ‘right on’.

Thought Prison: “Effectiveness is irrelevant: for political correctness abstract and altruistic allocation is intrinsically superior to human agency; it is therefore morally necessary to replace individual freedom with systemic coercion, regardless of the consequences.”

Coercion vitiates consent. We, the People, do not consent.

“Consequently they were nothing like as strenuous and public in their efforts to distance themselves from PIE as they are now claiming.

“Dromey is quoted as saying ‘I was at the forefront of repeated public condemnations of PIE and their despicable views’. That’s news to me. Maybe by ‘public’ he meant imprecations muttered to cronies at his local pub.”

Dromey’s wife Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour party, was legal officer at the NCCL between 1978 and 1982. She has expressed her “regret” over the NCCL’s involvement with PIE but has pointedly declined to apologise.”

Bring back hanging when?

We need a referendum on how to deal with paedophiles.

*scroll*
COMMENTS UNAVAILABLE

I could think of a few.

What happens to teenage rape victims?

Another reason forced marriage in a society or “child brides” are barbaric.

Plus a side track on promiscuity, statist preventable disease enabling and STD gene evolution.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X04002575

“Results
The lifetime prevalence of forced sex for females and males was 10.2% and 5.1%, respectively.

I’m disgusted by that alone.

What a “revolution”.

Feed the entitlement of (serial*) rapists.

For the overall sample, feeling sad/hopeless(odds ratio [OR] 1.9), having considered (OR 2.1) or attempted (OR 1.4) suicide, being a victim of physical dating violence (OR 2.8) heavy cigarette use (OR 1.4), binge drinking (OR 0.7), having multiple recent sexual partners (OR 8.3) and unprotected sex (OR 1.7) were correlated with a history of forced sex. Among females, associations were found among sad/hopeless feelings (OR 1.6), having considered suicide(OR 2.2), fighting (OR 1.3), physical dating violence (OR 2.1) heavy cigarette use (OR 1.8), multiple sexual partners (OR 9.3) , alcohol/or drug use before sex (OR 1.6) and unprotected sex (OR 1.5). Among males, associations were found among sad/hopeless feelings (OR 1.8), attempted suicide (OR 1.9), gun carrying (OR 1.8), physical dating violence (OR 4.3), multiple sexual partners (OR 7.8), unprotected sex (OR 1.9), and other ethnicity (OR 3.3).

Conclusions
Although a history of forced sexual intercourse affects a small number of adolescents,

10% of girls isn’t small….

1 in 20 boys neither?

it is an important public health issue. The psychological and behavioral correlates of forced sexuality

Flashback to all the statist propaganda of Sex Ed.

If we adults can’t be trusted with guns or sugary drinks because they enable bad behaviour, what about practically Tantric marital sex guides given to single, horny teenagers, along with condoms and pills?

Is that not encouraging anti-social behaviour?

The emphasis on “safe” sex is denying the legitimacy of celibacy. It assumes everyone is a slut. They can get that information online anyway. Innocence is illegal because explicit, brain-altering pornography is freely available (no credit card wall to safeguard from child access).
A single person shouldn’t be sleeping around, the touted health benefits of sex are statistically non-existent (compared to real exercise, comparing anything to a couch potato would be a benefit, that’s just bad science) and psychologically they’d be better off handling matters themselves if physically desperate than endangering everything from their marriage prospects to their mental health to their future cancer death risk.

Then there’s the rape allegation from sexual coercion, which is legally valid. How many teenagers are taught that instead of an ugly form of physical entitlement a la Brave New World?

Sex is the adult marker. Yes, it is serious and should be taken deadly seriously. The fallout of a sex life can get you killed (crime of passion is a legal defence in France).
Parents shouldn’t allow sexually active children to live with them anymore. It’s abnormal and contributes to this culture of infantile adults, with all the endorphin-producers and none of the struggle to get them. They regress and functionally retard themselves because those rewards signal the brain that it needn’t develop further, having earned the reproduction status in the tribe (and virgin genuises like Newton never really stopped growing intellectually, along with other comparable groups like monks). Children with early sexuality never catch up mentally either, for this reason. The window of opportunity is lost, it’s like trying to feed plant nutrients into a fruit that’s already been plucked. Future generations will look back in horror that we force-feed ducks to make liver paste but how much more that we encourage the most depraved degeneracy in the most vulnerable – children, which stunts their life, by outcomes? And an addiction, as freeing them?
If you’re mature enough to make babies (that’s what it is) then you have no right to intrude on your own parents. Traditional societies held this rite of passage important. Men who brag about losing their virginity aren’t taught to value purity of the body and psychological pair bonds, they’re kept ignorant of these (by vindictive sluts who want to convert others to misery) and consider themselves men for performing like prostitutes (white men, how far ye have fallen) for a near-stranger who doesn’t love them enough to give them children for it (the test of female loyalty is the investment of fertility). It’s empty. They think they’re proving how they’re independent but they still exist on their parent’s health insurance or under their father’s roof, it’s objectively pathetic. I’m surprised the Boomers didn’t give them a trophy. The Manwhore Medal.
Congratulations, you’ll make an inferior husband with every notch! – Just like the divorcing Boomers.
It is not “fun”, not sport, not exercise, not “good for you”, there is no upside to promiscuity. Scientifically, legally, it’s a con. It’s a self-numbing, self-soothing habit (which unlike masturbation, promotes disease**) that makes strangers have trouble connecting or ruin their pair bonding for the eventual marriage they, again, feel entitled to.

But won’t actually get (quality or bust).

Where did all the good women go? You made them notches. The rest of the world is laughing at America bitching about the consequence of their own causes. You want a culture of sluts, now you have shit marriages. You made your bed. America was the Patient Zero of how to fuck up an amazing civilization with degeneracy in modernity (and yes while planned you went along with it for gibs). You’ve done everything wrong but refuse to reverse it, whining that The Government should “fix it” with further incursions on responsible people’s freedoms when it’s individualism that caused it and…aren’t these guys libertarians? Highlights include bitching about abortion but wanting to keep it legal in cases of premarital consenting sex and bitching about disease rates but refusing to use condoms like a grown-up.

Are you men or not? Either you’re held responsible for your actions or not.

A basic fact that’s been known for ages:

Anyone terrified by being a parent isn’t mature enough to be having sex. If the thought of being a mother or father disgusts you, you shouldn’t be using those parts like Lego bricks (the ones that don’t un-stick) because you can’t un-make a baby.

How often does it mention that? At least, not to do anything downstairs with the opposite sex because… babies happen. They can’t act shocked when the process of baby-making produces one. That is normal.

How much of an idiot do you have to be, to deposit living sperm into or close to (anal) a vagina, and be surprised when a baby comes out nine months later? If you never want kids and you don’t get the snip first, age 18, you deserve to be laughed at. Women can’t get done age 18 but men can get it easily. It’s like something out of Idiocracy to act like your fertility is a surprise, that was a main joke at the opening of the film. You can show them all the pictures but they assume their lust can temporarily suspend the laws of biology. And they treat pregnancy as a disease, like the late-term abortion monsters. (You consented to make it, that’s all sex is, sex is not an orgasm, nobody is stopping you from having those, it even happens in sleep for both sexes. I would add that the cultural focus on orgasms is intended to weaken bonds with pressure and tire people though, it isn’t the purpose and shouldn’t be a focus if you care about health.)

Expecting infertility is abnormal. Really creepy, if you think about it.
A union of death.

Sex Ed doesn’t educate at all, it misinforms.

suggest that these youth have been harmed

really?

the overt pedos saying about raping menstruating little girls are abusive?

wow, shook

and may further place themselves in harm’s way.

Self-destruction, common reaction to abuse.

People are not sex toys or ego pacifiers, whatever Sex Ed has “taught” you.

Intimacy means a lot to people who aren’t psychologically broken. It’s serious. Only a psychopath sees people as toys.

Furthermore, the profiles of adolescent females and males who report such experiences are distinct in ways that warrant their independent examination and attention.”

Different biology, different trauma. Female virginity is more complex of course, involving fertility as the carrier sex and there’s the high risk of physical permanent damage including scarring. Given that fact, the female is historically considered worse (protect the baby-carrying sex is a survival instinct, female fertility or available brides are a vital resource of a race) but men and boys merit individual study as a sex that tries to reduce their numbers (abused) and improve their life outcomes too, while acknowledging sex differences without shame. A cultural change is needed there.

No sex without (full) consent, as this shows, that’s just rape.
It ruins lives.
Strangely, it also increases race-mixing. Stress dampens the typical aversion? Or it seems riskier? This would apply to any racial dynamics, remember, so a black girl would become more likely to sleep with a Mexican, for example.

This is a major factor in suicide, unspoken.

Slutty men and women are far more likely to be acting out their abuse in a way they feel they control.

https://psychologydictionary.org/repetition-compulsion/

It is informally known as “acting out” but instead of relieving themselves of the pain, it’s a temporary purge that brings on feelings of shame and isolation, which they’re often told means they must sleep around more. By the Sex Ed groomers.

Sex is not a suitable anti-depressant. If you must, just masturbate (needing porn is a form of impotence). There’s higher esteem and satisfaction where studied anyway, don’t expect the groomers to tell you that (otherwise how could they rape their students?) … they want to convert people to their miserable lifestyle.

Emotional distance is not normal in men, nor stoicism (philosophical stoics are very close to people) but it’s a fear of emotional intimacy, especially with the demographic of their attacker/s.

*Their libido doesn’t disappear after one attack.

**The MRAs going on about male cancer studies don’t want to research how bad the habit of promiscuity is for the health of a male body because they might have their feelings hurt. They might be judged or questioned (death before triggering?)… There’s a link between anal “sex” and various cancers, for example. Fuck like a gay man, get the same disease risk profile of one. They hardly research it (fine, die?) but penile cancers etc all rise because of fecal bacteria (you know they refuse condoms, just like a homo).

And they’re the reason syphilis is back (men are the major carrier). Hope you like your dick dropping off because you’re too manly to protect it (valid Q: who would know you use condoms unless you tell them and have you seen how many male porn stars get HIV?). Antibiotics are failing on various STDs because the Government gives them all the antibiotics they want without telling them to be less of a slut in future and, being stupid, they use them wrong – directly causing resistance. 

The State shouldn’t hand them out again because hey, you can’t be trusted to use them properly and take measures to avoid infection, so eventually they will fail because of your behaviour.

Another cause of resistance is that they often have multiple STDs (and don’t tell the other party beforehand, which is rape), that swap genes. Still the State refuses to quit enabling the walking public disease cases. The rest of us suffer.

The STDs are preferentially evolving within the male system because nobody is telling the manwhores to stop. The rest of us don’t want to die on the operating table for a large garden splinter age 44.

They grow where irresponsibility lives.

Proof:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180627160523.htm
“The analysis revealed that 9 percent of gonococcal genes showed increased expression exclusively in men and included genes involved in host immune cell interactions.”
The female expression was half that. Tell the manwhores to stop (and the slutty women obviously) or the drugs will become smothered and ineffective in the human immune system (i.e. of all of us).

The “I’m not harming anyone” libertarian argument is bullshit! We have genome data!

It’s evolving around your stupidity. To kill the species.

(By infertility or direct mortality does not matter).

Statistically?

America doesn’t need a baby boom either, you need the contraction that’s happening because few of you can get married, can afford children and raise them properly plus the Baby Boomer generation was a fluke of history (and world war dead), repeating it will constrict your society and cause more Boom problems. More people, less prosperity (see India). Picture overflowing sewers. You need to be K-selected and focus on quality while reducing foreign (genetic) competition for your domestic tax base resources (your birthright). You cannot out-breed the billions of Asia and Africa and South America. America is a small country compared to most of the globe. Thankfully, you don’t have to.

And immigration doesn’t actually help, Magic Dirt doesn’t fix their tendency to over-breed.

The guys going on about the Spartans can’t sit out in the cold overnight once but never talk about the boy rape by “mentors” (it was Ancient Greece), not being able to choose who you marry (class was important) or being forbidden from living with your own wife until age 30 so… we’ll pass on that system. While making men full citizens age 30 is a good idea neurologically, for voting especially, the sexual stuff is creepy. Plus, you’d 100% be drafted. Sparta was a military force, you can’t be a Spartan male in lifestyle and not be drafted. Usually these same guys getting misty-eyed about Brotherhood (military cult dogma) also bitch about the idea they might be drafted as “sexist” – yes, but in a good way. Men evolved to fight. Men are better equipped to defend themselves. Women are needed so the nation doesn’t die biologically (whatever the outcome) and many women don’t reproduce either (social reasons) but men always fought one another as a rite of passage for a wife and few ancient men bred, your odds are better nowadays. Why complain you have an advantage (self-defense) and the state knows about it? Would you rather be a woman, and physically weaker? Are you sure?

(Physically weaker and more likely to be sexually attacked, 10% lifetime rape risk up top, great combo – there’s your ‘hate crime’).

update:

I didn’t know this existed already until I looked but fuck you America.

http://advocatesaz.org/2012/11/20/std-awareness-antibiotic-resistant-syphilis/

HOW DO YOU KEEP GETTING WORSE. HOW.

“and when the disease goes untreated, it can cause severe, possibly fatal, damage to the nervous system.”

Slutty preppers die first.

Hollywood abuse happens to men too

Of course it does, even people like me readily own up to the reality, it’s rarer but can be more sadistic. Women don’t feel qualified to discuss male-on-male abuse, the same way we try to draw attention to the industries in general.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/oct/31/hollywood-male-abusers-boys-gay-men-kevin-spacey

Men and boys.

There’s even less sympathy there.

What do you think the drugs are for? All minors (or adult and with principles).

Props to the Guardian for actually owning up to this.

They aren’t all bad, all the time.
They have a duty to report on this, considering the luvvie set write for them.

It’s a shame Chester can’t see this. Come on, Corey, the iron is hot!

Sitting around bitching into Youtube does sweet FA.

Note: this follows the SJW outing the white gay male from the victim circle. They don’t have to “keep the secrets” anymore.

Reproductive abuse

is the non-PC term.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/juliegerstein/ian-somerhalder-says-he-threw-out-nikki-reeds-birth-control

I guess it might apply to men but that definition has yet to be written since men don’t carry.

https://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Health-Care-for-Underserved-Women/Reproductive-and-Sexual-Coercion

Interesting but incomplete.

It centres around carrying a baby. The anguish, stress, pain and humiliation.
And men complain about cuckolding. Which is an omission.

Most popular actions are

  1. throwing away birth control or tampering
  2. lying about sexual status, including STDs, but especially fertility. This includes specifics e.g. certain positions or pulling out and you won’t get pregnant.
  3. interfering with a pregnancy, like the most common being the classic pushing the woman down stairs or punching her in the stomach
  4. forcing birth control on a woman e.g. in food
  5. coercion not to use a condom or other contraception.

That last one is most common.

Stealthers are not only rapists but yes, it’s reproductive abuse too. A judge would see it that way, no consent was given to the particular acts undertake by stealth/deceit.
This is how the r-selected breed.

I’m guessing that is why Kylie Jenner is up the duff. Hefty toll.