What happens to teenage rape victims?

Another reason forced marriage in a society or “child brides” are barbaric.

Plus a side track on promiscuity, statist preventable disease enabling and STD gene evolution.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X04002575

“Results
The lifetime prevalence of forced sex for females and males was 10.2% and 5.1%, respectively.

I’m disgusted by that alone.

What a “revolution”.

Feed the entitlement of (serial*) rapists.

For the overall sample, feeling sad/hopeless(odds ratio [OR] 1.9), having considered (OR 2.1) or attempted (OR 1.4) suicide, being a victim of physical dating violence (OR 2.8) heavy cigarette use (OR 1.4), binge drinking (OR 0.7), having multiple recent sexual partners (OR 8.3) and unprotected sex (OR 1.7) were correlated with a history of forced sex. Among females, associations were found among sad/hopeless feelings (OR 1.6), having considered suicide(OR 2.2), fighting (OR 1.3), physical dating violence (OR 2.1) heavy cigarette use (OR 1.8), multiple sexual partners (OR 9.3) , alcohol/or drug use before sex (OR 1.6) and unprotected sex (OR 1.5). Among males, associations were found among sad/hopeless feelings (OR 1.8), attempted suicide (OR 1.9), gun carrying (OR 1.8), physical dating violence (OR 4.3), multiple sexual partners (OR 7.8), unprotected sex (OR 1.9), and other ethnicity (OR 3.3).

Conclusions
Although a history of forced sexual intercourse affects a small number of adolescents,

10% of girls isn’t small….

1 in 20 boys neither?

it is an important public health issue. The psychological and behavioral correlates of forced sexuality

Flashback to all the statist propaganda of Sex Ed.

If we adults can’t be trusted with guns or sugary drinks because they enable bad behaviour, what about practically Tantric marital sex guides given to single, horny teenagers, along with condoms and pills?

Is that not encouraging anti-social behaviour?

The emphasis on “safe” sex is denying the legitimacy of celibacy. It assumes everyone is a slut. They can get that information online anyway. Innocence is illegal because explicit, brain-altering pornography is freely available (no credit card wall to safeguard from child access).
A single person shouldn’t be sleeping around, the touted health benefits of sex are statistically non-existent (compared to real exercise, comparing anything to a couch potato would be a benefit, that’s just bad science) and psychologically they’d be better off handling matters themselves if physically desperate than endangering everything from their marriage prospects to their mental health to their future cancer death risk.

Then there’s the rape allegation from sexual coercion, which is legally valid. How many teenagers are taught that instead of an ugly form of physical entitlement a la Brave New World?

Sex is the adult marker. Yes, it is serious and should be taken deadly seriously. The fallout of a sex life can get you killed (crime of passion is a legal defence in France).
Parents shouldn’t allow sexually active children to live with them anymore. It’s abnormal and contributes to this culture of infantile adults, with all the endorphin-producers and none of the struggle to get them. They regress and functionally retard themselves because those rewards signal the brain that it needn’t develop further, having earned the reproduction status in the tribe (and virgin genuises like Newton never really stopped growing intellectually, along with other comparable groups like monks). Children with early sexuality never catch up mentally either, for this reason. The window of opportunity is lost, it’s like trying to feed plant nutrients into a fruit that’s already been plucked. Future generations will look back in horror that we force-feed ducks to make liver paste but how much more that we encourage the most depraved degeneracy in the most vulnerable – children, which stunts their life, by outcomes? And an addiction, as freeing them?
If you’re mature enough to make babies (that’s what it is) then you have no right to intrude on your own parents. Traditional societies held this rite of passage important. Men who brag about losing their virginity aren’t taught to value purity of the body and psychological pair bonds, they’re kept ignorant of these (by vindictive sluts who want to convert others to misery) and consider themselves men for performing like prostitutes (white men, how far ye have fallen) for a near-stranger who doesn’t love them enough to give them children for it (the test of female loyalty is the investment of fertility). It’s empty. They think they’re proving how they’re independent but they still exist on their parent’s health insurance or under their father’s roof, it’s objectively pathetic. I’m surprised the Boomers didn’t give them a trophy. The Manwhore Medal.
Congratulations, you’ll make an inferior husband with every notch! – Just like the divorcing Boomers.
It is not “fun”, not sport, not exercise, not “good for you”, there is no upside to promiscuity. Scientifically, legally, it’s a con. It’s a self-numbing, self-soothing habit (which unlike masturbation, promotes disease**) that makes strangers have trouble connecting or ruin their pair bonding for the eventual marriage they, again, feel entitled to.

But won’t actually get (quality or bust).

Where did all the good women go? You made them notches. The rest of the world is laughing at America bitching about the consequence of their own causes. You want a culture of sluts, now you have shit marriages. You made your bed. America was the Patient Zero of how to fuck up an amazing civilization with degeneracy in modernity (and yes while planned you went along with it for gibs). You’ve done everything wrong but refuse to reverse it, whining that The Government should “fix it” with further incursions on responsible people’s freedoms when it’s individualism that caused it and…aren’t these guys libertarians? Highlights include bitching about abortion but wanting to keep it legal in cases of premarital consenting sex and bitching about disease rates but refusing to use condoms like a grown-up.

Are you men or not? Either you’re held responsible for your actions or not.

A basic fact that’s been known for ages:

Anyone terrified by being a parent isn’t mature enough to be having sex. If the thought of being a mother or father disgusts you, you shouldn’t be using those parts like Lego bricks (the ones that don’t un-stick) because you can’t un-make a baby.

How often does it mention that? At least, not to do anything downstairs with the opposite sex because… babies happen. They can’t act shocked when the process of baby-making produces one. That is normal.

How much of an idiot do you have to be, to deposit living sperm into or close to (anal) a vagina, and be surprised when a baby comes out nine months later? If you never want kids and you don’t get the snip first, age 18, you deserve to be laughed at. Women can’t get done age 18 but men can get it easily. It’s like something out of Idiocracy to act like your fertility is a surprise, that was a main joke at the opening of the film. You can show them all the pictures but they assume their lust can temporarily suspend the laws of biology. And they treat pregnancy as a disease, like the late-term abortion monsters. (You consented to make it, that’s all sex is, sex is not an orgasm, nobody is stopping you from having those, it even happens in sleep for both sexes. I would add that the cultural focus on orgasms is intended to weaken bonds with pressure and tire people though, it isn’t the purpose and shouldn’t be a focus if you care about health.)

Expecting infertility is abnormal. Really creepy, if you think about it.
A union of death.

Sex Ed doesn’t educate at all, it misinforms.

suggest that these youth have been harmed

really?

the overt pedos saying about raping menstruating little girls are abusive?

wow, shook

and may further place themselves in harm’s way.

Self-destruction, common reaction to abuse.

People are not sex toys or ego pacifiers, whatever Sex Ed has “taught” you.

Intimacy means a lot to people who aren’t psychologically broken. It’s serious. Only a psychopath sees people as toys.

Furthermore, the profiles of adolescent females and males who report such experiences are distinct in ways that warrant their independent examination and attention.”

Different biology, different trauma. Female virginity is more complex of course, involving fertility as the carrier sex and there’s the high risk of physical permanent damage including scarring. Given that fact, the female is historically considered worse (protect the baby-carrying sex is a survival instinct, female fertility or available brides are a vital resource of a race) but men and boys merit individual study as a sex that tries to reduce their numbers (abused) and improve their life outcomes too, while acknowledging sex differences without shame. A cultural change is needed there.

No sex without (full) consent, as this shows, that’s just rape.
It ruins lives.
Strangely, it also increases race-mixing. Stress dampens the typical aversion? Or it seems riskier? This would apply to any racial dynamics, remember, so a black girl would become more likely to sleep with a Mexican, for example.

This is a major factor in suicide, unspoken.

Slutty men and women are far more likely to be acting out their abuse in a way they feel they control.

https://psychologydictionary.org/repetition-compulsion/

It is informally known as “acting out” but instead of relieving themselves of the pain, it’s a temporary purge that brings on feelings of shame and isolation, which they’re often told means they must sleep around more. By the Sex Ed groomers.

Sex is not a suitable anti-depressant. If you must, just masturbate (needing porn is a form of impotence). There’s higher esteem and satisfaction where studied anyway, don’t expect the groomers to tell you that (otherwise how could they rape their students?) … they want to convert people to their miserable lifestyle.

Emotional distance is not normal in men, nor stoicism (philosophical stoics are very close to people) but it’s a fear of emotional intimacy, especially with the demographic of their attacker/s.

*Their libido doesn’t disappear after one attack.

**The MRAs going on about male cancer studies don’t want to research how bad the habit of promiscuity is for the health of a male body because they might have their feelings hurt. They might be judged or questioned (death before triggering?)… There’s a link between anal “sex” and various cancers, for example. Fuck like a gay man, get the same disease risk profile of one. They hardly research it (fine, die?) but penile cancers etc all rise because of fecal bacteria (you know they refuse condoms, just like a homo).

And they’re the reason syphilis is back (men are the major carrier). Hope you like your dick dropping off because you’re too manly to protect it (valid Q: who would know you use condoms unless you tell them and have you seen how many male porn stars get HIV?). Antibiotics are failing on various STDs because the Government gives them all the antibiotics they want without telling them to be less of a slut in future and, being stupid, they use them wrong – directly causing resistance. 

The State shouldn’t hand them out again because hey, you can’t be trusted to use them properly and take measures to avoid infection, so eventually they will fail because of your behaviour.

Another cause of resistance is that they often have multiple STDs (and don’t tell the other party beforehand, which is rape), that swap genes. Still the State refuses to quit enabling the walking public disease cases. The rest of us suffer.

The STDs are preferentially evolving within the male system because nobody is telling the manwhores to stop. The rest of us don’t want to die on the operating table for a large garden splinter age 44.

They grow where irresponsibility lives.

Proof:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180627160523.htm
“The analysis revealed that 9 percent of gonococcal genes showed increased expression exclusively in men and included genes involved in host immune cell interactions.”
The female expression was half that. Tell the manwhores to stop (and the slutty women obviously) or the drugs will become smothered and ineffective in the human immune system (i.e. of all of us).

The “I’m not harming anyone” libertarian argument is bullshit! We have genome data!

It’s evolving around your stupidity. To kill the species.

(By infertility or direct mortality does not matter).

Statistically?

America doesn’t need a baby boom either, you need the contraction that’s happening because few of you can get married, can afford children and raise them properly plus the Baby Boomer generation was a fluke of history (and world war dead), repeating it will constrict your society and cause more Boom problems. More people, less prosperity (see India). Picture overflowing sewers. You need to be K-selected and focus on quality while reducing foreign (genetic) competition for your domestic tax base resources (your birthright). You cannot out-breed the billions of Asia and Africa and South America. America is a small country compared to most of the globe. Thankfully, you don’t have to.

And immigration doesn’t actually help, Magic Dirt doesn’t fix their tendency to over-breed.

The guys going on about the Spartans can’t sit out in the cold overnight once but never talk about the boy rape by “mentors” (it was Ancient Greece), not being able to choose who you marry (class was important) or being forbidden from living with your own wife until age 30 so… we’ll pass on that system. While making men full citizens age 30 is a good idea neurologically, for voting especially, the sexual stuff is creepy. Plus, you’d 100% be drafted. Sparta was a military force, you can’t be a Spartan male in lifestyle and not be drafted. Usually these same guys getting misty-eyed about Brotherhood (military cult dogma) also bitch about the idea they might be drafted as “sexist” – yes, but in a good way. Men evolved to fight. Men are better equipped to defend themselves. Women are needed so the nation doesn’t die biologically (whatever the outcome) and many women don’t reproduce either (social reasons) but men always fought one another as a rite of passage for a wife and few ancient men bred, your odds are better nowadays. Why complain you have an advantage (self-defense) and the state knows about it? Would you rather be a woman, and physically weaker? Are you sure?

(Physically weaker and more likely to be sexually attacked, 10% lifetime rape risk up top, great combo – there’s your ‘hate crime’).

update:

I didn’t know this existed already until I looked but fuck you America.

http://advocatesaz.org/2012/11/20/std-awareness-antibiotic-resistant-syphilis/

HOW DO YOU KEEP GETTING WORSE. HOW.

“and when the disease goes untreated, it can cause severe, possibly fatal, damage to the nervous system.”

Slutty preppers die first.

Yes it is

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/08/14/harvey-weinstein-sex-trafficking-lawsuit-can-proceed-judge-rules.html
“Weinstein claimed through his lawyers that letting the lawsuit proceed to trial means sex trafficking laws now cover all sexual activity between adults when one person holds power and influence over the other.”
Yes? And?
Tears of a psychopath.

What is holds there? Define holds? They’re so stupid they trip themselves up in their own defense. Threat of punishment however vague (inc. stonewalling and other emotional abuse) or doing the (things) anyway is rape. You’d have to lack a conscience not to get this. That isn’t really asking, that’s telling. Telling someone how to use their body (an ownership right) is trafficking. 

Sounds awfully like a whip hand, a master and a slave dynamic. That is illegal.
For any employer to induce illegal activities (workplaces don’t allow relationships) would be.
When you use the “power” to get the “sex”, that is trafficking. That is all they do!
There are rapists who use their “power” of intimidation to receive “sex” in an alley… was that consensual?

Do plush settings suddenly mean a person is magically free of the risk of harm?

Does their No hold more weight?

What did you enjoy doing to the women who told you No?

Sexual sadism is not legal, you subhuman monster.

A person who is not totally free to say no and have that respected is a slave, they cannot truly say yes either. Coercion means any consent later given is under duress – it doesn’t count! This even applies to contracts (not that your NDAs apply to illegal activities).

This has been part of the law since the Vikings, they couldn’t even kiss a woman unless it was a raid (war). If you won’t respect boundaries, where’s the consent in crossing them? And consenting to something doesn’t make it socially acceptable, you nutbar. Pretending you’re just too damn irresistible fools no one. The expected response is always No. Otherwise, I can dip into your bank account, and just assume you’re okay with it.

A person’s livelihood is how they stay alive and it’s the thing slave-owners “held” over their captives.

You’ll notice rapists like to lie about rape law. Wonder why!

And no, the “freeze” response of the nervous system, common to terrified women and children, is not consent. Actually, it’s a sign to stop and back off. Humans use their words and there’s no excuse not to. Ironically, the word “frigid” just captures that evolved response to other predators e.g. ones that hunt by motion, like a sabretooth tiger. Consent can never, ever be presumed. PTSD soldiers go frigid when thinking of battle, that’s the level.

Passivity isn’t consent or an empty house is “asking for it”. Women and children know they cannot fight off an attack, so they freeze. This is biological fact. It doesn’t “mean” anything but that. Victim blaming people for having a nervous system?

This reminds me of the weird American loophole that allows cops to rape their detained suspects, and later say it was consensual. See the part about consent =/= ethical? There should be a law that while at work you can’t “have sex with” someone, even if they’re wearing handcuffs. Passively.

You can’t drink beer, sexual matters should be off the table too. In a civilized society. Everything else aside, the power imbalance makes consent impossible. One party literally has a gun.

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/evbvem/two-cops-got-charged-with-rape-after-a-teens-desperate-public-plea

“oral sodomy” too, quite a term

Link: Sexual coercion

http://what-when-how.com/interpersonal-violence/coerced-sexual-initiation/

It isn’t about “inhibitions”, like not being a tart is a bad thing, it’s about the ability to resist.

“not currently included in the legal definition of rape” False, it’s always been under seduction law.

Telling people what we should be told as children is great because everyone loves you except for the rapists, who out themselves in the process of complaining about warning people how to spot abuse.

Maybe…. don’t abuse? Then you won’t get “falsely accused” of it?
An accusation isn’t false because it happens to you, narc. (They reinterpret reality. Called gaslight.)

Sexual coercion can easily turn into rape, because if one No isn’t good enough, they won’t listen to dozens more either.

What a “player”

Rapist jailed after beating woman and keeping her as a ‘sex slave’

During cross-examination, vile Patton even asked his defence barrister: ‘How can it have been rape if there was no violence?’

Where the hell would someone get such a totally wrong idea?

This is why coercion and threats don’t count as consent. Legally.
It is much the same as a written contract.

Leeds Crown Court heard that Patton was ‘obsessed’ with his victim and he threatened to hurt her family and damage their property if she did not agree to meet him.

He should be swinging from a rope like the Rotherham lot. How can white supremacists claim to be superior while they’re soft on people like this? You want to let this one run around near your sisters, mothers, grandmothers, daughters – because an owner of a penis can do no wrong? You think you’d get low crime that way? Like majority white Europe never hanged people?

No Patriarchy in history went nicely on abusive little men, let alone easy.
They knew they only get worse, a rotten apple mustn’t be allowed to spoil the barrel.
His victim is ruined for life. As an r-type, you’d expect him to be proud of this.

Sexual entitlement, this is where it leads.

Today, at the same court, Patton was sentenced to 13 years in prison.

For seven charges? I hate this country. Why bother? Why not 13 days? 13 minutes?

Patton, who in the past had told the woman she was ‘nothing but a dog’,

Clean the gene pool, please. Men, this is your gender role.

slapped her repeatedly and even brandished a knife before telling her he was going use her as a sex slave.

Where did he get that idea?

Did anyone ask? ….

“No violence” guys, and if you think he’s nicer to other men, you’d be naive.
Psychopaths are worse with men than they are with women.

But women need to “give men a chance”, right? Fuck our right to safety, let’s coddle some snowflakes.
When men give creepy guys on the bus a chance, we might listen.

Patton has previous convictions for criminal damage, theft and battery.

And just 13 years?

And doing anything to an unconsenting person is violence. Because of the consent part. So I’m guessing low IQ with omnipotent fantasies of Genghis Khan?

(He probably thinks Khan wasn’t a rapist either).

The battery occurred in 2014 when he pinned his own mother to the floor by the neck and then punched her once in the face.

Alpha.

A generation with no father to slap them for getting out of line? Guessing.
What’s the bet he blames his mother for his deadbeat father? Would this be delta or omega, in the silly hierarchy?

But we can’t bring back drafting why? If they’re violent thugs anyway?

After being locked in the house the first night, his victim banged on the windows and screamed to attract attention, but Patton ran over and grabbed her by the mouth and nose, put his arm around her neck and told her to shut up.

“No violence” guys.

He choked her but no violence, obviously.

Having put his arm around her neck, Patton threw her on the floor then picked her up and threw her on the sofa, smothering her and causing her to struggle to breathe. When she told him that she did not want him, Patton replied: ‘Wrong answer.’

“No violence”.

Sometimes the feminists have a point. The right to refuse anything is a basic human right of liberty. I bet he didn’t want to marry her, either, so a traditional excuse of “but it’s creepy love!” wouldn’t wash.

I doubt her father would give permission to let a man abuse his daughter, in marriage or out.

This isn’t a thing where it’s okay when white people do it. I see too many soft men talking tough about tan-toned women but when it’s a white person and especially a male there’s an almost privileged number of excuses made.

But there’s no such thing as male privilege (read end, I now believe). Any woman who doesn’t want to be raped is a feminist (well, shit, I guess we all are, how terrible of us not to be whores from porn).

No, there are no excuses for any aspect of this. It is evil.

EVIL.

Evil when any sex, race, sexuality does it.

Pure, Satanic evil.

Patton grabbed her hands and made her hit herself in the face. She was petrified, crying her eyes out, and he picked up a knife from the mantelpiece.

 

“No violence”

She was screaming for him to calm down. He was telling her she should slit her throat, but she managed to calm him down and he forced her to kiss him and tell him she loved him.

“No violence”

The next morning, he told her that if she performed oral sex on him that it would calm him down before ejaculating inside her wearing no protection.

Rape, would count even in a relationship. Clear elements of force (ordering, changes).

It’s like the callous men assume this can never happen to them either.
Plenty of male rape victims in the world. Rapists use the same tactics on them.

Let me guess, after the (attempted) coercion, she put up last minute resistance?

That force has a legal name, rape.

Check the legal codes. I did.

When the victim went for a shower, Patton came in and raped her again.

I wonder if Roosh V’s forum will welcome him with open arms for having a “concubine”. Check the web history, I’m certain you’ll find it, but the police haven’t reached the level of common sense where they look for incitement to rape and “rape isn’t real” (because women aren’t human) propaganda. I said this would happen years ago, you plant the entitlement and lie about the laws then eventually some psycho will act on it.

But the propagandists are also legally culpable. This isn’t a “game”…

‘Given his young age, I am going to give him the benefit of the doubt and not say that he is dangerous.’

He should be swinging. I’m sure he’ll convert to Islam while he’s in there. He’ll fit right in.

Update: I can only find the false dichotomy of rape and violence (rape is inherently violent as the ultimate sexual, violent crime) in PUA materials.

This was literally the top of the search results. Don’t get mad at me.

e.g. http://www.rooshv.com/how-to-stop-rape

“What I’ve gathered from the words of these future Pulitzer Prize winners is that women are not getting raped by violent offenders while taking a jog in the park or walking through a dark street—they are getting raped by men they already know,”

I can’t find this false distinction anywhere else? Can anyone else show an earlier origin?

Seriously. Genuine request. Where did this toxic narrative come from?

“I also read that men must be taught not to rape,”

but what of the places that teach them to rape?

“which means that they are all born with the capability to rape and have zero instinct to know that taking a woman with violence is improper.”

Define violence. You don’t have to pin someone down if you coerced them but both are violent acts in consent law, whether it’s sexual or cheating granny out of her title deeds. Any force of consent is not consent.
In that very wording there is already violence “taking”, rape means to “take”.

The basic premise of that mess was: It isn’t my male duty to control my body, it is the world’s responsibility to tread on eggshells around it for me.

SJW logic.

That’s why everybody thought wow, what a pajama boy. Handle your own feelings, including lust. That’s in the sodding Bible. The men who claim to know how sexual relations should play out better than Jesus

pic unrelated

and that strangely put all the social power on one side (a dying society, because the sexes can’t cooperate) is a sign of how our times are done for.
And if rape were legal, it would mostly be men raping other men. It would involve murder. You can’t have a rape culture without a high risk of homicide. The world would be a gay bar toilet at 2am. Somehow I don’t think this is what they envisioned, being very echo chamber. The highest sex drive men… are gay. The streets would be like prison for the average man, kidnappings and false imprisonments would be the norm.

There was no logic to call it a “thought experiment”, it was a stupid metaphor (private space*, sexual safe space, yes!) about how a woman’s No is never real because neither is rape. If you don’t believe in certain things, what’s the point calling yourself a society?

This guy (top) lived out Roosh’s rape “experiment”, on “private” (read: false imprisonment) property. Nobody else seems to have made this connection.

*Which is ironically calling on ideas of a marital bed and conjugal rights to endorse fornication and rape.

What is sexual coercion? (hint: not consensual)

It’s a positive sign when the sluts and manwhores kvetch over this information getting out.

It’s a great way of outing rapists, like the vegan test. Just discuss rape by fraud and out pop the rapists.

Oddly they’ll talk about male rape as a red herring, when men are probably coerced as much as women based on porn myths i.e. men always want it.

These are your rights. Your right to personal sovereignty, physical power over your own body. They don’t want potential victims to know their rights.

Like, there’s nothing wrong with being a consumer, but purchasing stolen goods is still illegal. Fraud is always possible.

http://www.consented.ca/consent/coercion/
“It’s not that they did not say “no,” but that they could not say “no.””
People will happily admit duress is wrong, but make it something physical, than written… suddenly they argue it’s ‘complicated’ – no.

http://www.loveisrespect.org/content/what-sexual-coercion/

Or you could stop blaming the victim and simply bring back seduction law, which prevented some of the lesser-known forms of rape. (Because consent needs to be fully, truthfully informed).

Seduction is a form of abusive manipulation. It’s sick that society uses the term to mean something admirable.

Seduction is illegal under English common law. Simply enforce it.
Most of the American system is based on it too. Sinatra was charged with it.