White immigrants are still r-types

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/aug/16/pawel-relowicz-faces-jail-crude-offences-women-hull

Getting the dregs of any country is bad.

White people are not made equal to one another either.

Glorifying someone because of their skin colour is downright anti-social. There is zero need for immigration, we must be self-sustaining wherever possible. Self-loathing from the fake right because Muh Polish r superior is just as cringe-worthy as some SJW fawning over a Syrian Muslim.

Letting someone like this in harkens to a pro-Europe bland culture that never existed. Europe has never been united because it’s impossible, Empires DIE.

Magic Dirt doesn’t apply to other whites and genetic distance shows difference at a subrace level too.

Eastern Europe is a shithole. They have the r-selected birthrate and low child investment to prove it. Importing people from those places will attract opportunistic dregs outsourcing their childcare costs to the ‘fellow whites’.

Because they love us so much… as long as we give them free shit our own people are entitled to.

Gibs to whites is immoral too.

Thou shalt not steal. So much for Christianity.

This muh fellow white bullshit is cucky, libertarian and anti-national.

Bare minimum, consider IQ and criminality. Never fund the outgroup’s reproduction.

Oppression from Fellow Huwites is a bitter pill to swallow.

Eastern Europe didn’t tighten up its standards over the centuries like the West and it shows, they deserve the comparatively inferior system they have now. No excuses for them either. If they really loved their country so much, they wouldn’t infest ours like a white chinatown (cultural invasion, replacement) and eat the seed crop like hungry rats aboard the Titanic (pillaging, post-invasion).

Oh but muh cultural enrichment, right?

Why does the Guardian love them, that tells you everything you need to know….

Why is mugging, stabbing and burglary up in London but DOWN in Poland? [see end]

The so-called red-pills have blinkers on for Muh Fellow White crime and it’s sickening.

Ben Bruce Provides Reports Showing Poland and Romania Have More Inmates Than Nigerians In UK Cells

Nationality of prisoner by crime, 2016:

Theft 1 Romania, 2 Lithuania, 3 Poland

Robbery 1 Ireland 2 Romania

Fraud 1 Romania 3 Albania

Burglary 1 Romania 2 Poland 3 Ireland

Violence 1 Poland 2 Ireland 3 Lithuania

Yes, our fellow whites are so caring for us!

It’s all non-white, right? Wow, you’re so red-pilled! All white immigrants are magically saints!

They’re totally not playing you and your bullshit sense of white loyalty. Which has never existed in all history, it’s been nationalism or bust.

For a reason.

Because a Polish bloke raping your sister is so much better. The whites only cucks disgust me. How deluded do you have to be?

I don’t wanna live near foreign thieves and sex pests, I don’t care if they’re so white they’d glow in sunlight! Advocating for them purely on the morally meaningless grounds of pigment is a betrayal of the domestic people, who can move nowhere else. It’s still genocide, of the people and culture, it’s still a replacement. It’s also a betrayal of native men, whose work is stolen, directly, by people with de facto MORE options.

No work, no money, no family. It’s directly impacting our birth rates.

These cuckoo egg pregnancies are not one of us, genetically, culturally, criminally and they will leave (abandoning us to debts they ran up with their welfare) when the economy contracts, predictably (r-types).

Covering for criminals is emboldening them to get worse.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2102895/Immigrant-crimewave-warning-Foreign-nationals-accused-QUARTER-crimes-London.html

Accusations: 1st place Poland, 2nd Romania, 3rd Lithuania, 4th Ireland, 8th French, 9th Italian, 10th Portuguese. Yes, famous non-white countries, and I’m sure the criminals here love the people enabling it because Muh Whites make civilization, right?

London is so civilized now! Walk through any Polish-dominant area alone at night and see how safe you feel, among your fellow white! It’s totally like the 50s, surrounded by fellow Anglos! They’re just like us! Diversity is our strength! We need them!

We all know what they’re teaching their kids. Giving your kid a crowbar is not civilized behaviour.

Many become builders to know how to break into said structures. A lot case a joint while working on it, they have a reason to be seen on the property later and they can keep prices low as bait because of pawn sales. It’s easy to become a burglar when you know who’s living alone, who’s on holiday, what security they have and you made a spare key.

We must dispel this hilarious myth that all white people are civilized, it’s shit.

Why trust someone with a foreign passport to secure your home, when they can hop on a plane today? Rich people don’t hire Trojan builders, it’s known what they really are. The builders can also be scouts for valuable items, related to the burglar. House parties are also used for scouting.

Muh white ppl = civilization!

like Spain? Portugal? Greece? France? Romania?

Even Hitler didn’t believe that and he was on some serious meds.

Believing this will ruin us, like it ruined Rome.

Yes, the women are hot, so what? If you remove the trowel make-up most of them look weird (manjaw, with African broad, fat-lipped mouths) and plain (beady eyes, large nose). From the neck-down the average is okay but the problem is comparing to fat people, so they’d always look better obviously. Compared to healthy body weight anglos or West Europeans generally, they have blatant peasant limbs (stocky) and squat torsos, no waist on the women unless starved. Athletic boyish figures when young, prone to obesity past 30. You can get on a plane to Poland any time you like, that’s no reason to import the whores of eight welfare kids on the rest of us. The hot ones get thrown into modelling and out of normal reach anyway, they peak at 15. Come back 8 years later and they’re a mess. They age like Polynesians, if there’s anything there, a strong bloom from about 15-25 then age like festering shit on the sidewalk in summer. R-types peak sexually earlier.

Nordic women are the real natural beauties of the region, no make-up required (especially the Kardashian eye make-up, that’s how you spot fug). Oddly, they’re not queuing up to live here. Nor become breeding sows on our taxpayer teat. Funny that.

We must be honest about the myriad anti-social ways immigrants are screwing us, even when it makes us uncomfortable. No free passes, that is a weakness.

Let’s face it, there are shitty white people too and they’re a bigger threat, when you think about it.

Unless sex crimes in a foreign nation are suddenly okay when a white guy’s doing it?

http://archiwum.thenews.pl/1/11/Artykul/371867

2018: The number of thefts, robberies and acts of vandalism have decreased in Poland, a daily reported.

Such offences dropped by 22,000 incidents in the first half of 2018 year on year, the Rzeczpospolita daily said citing statistics released by Polish police headquarters.

They’re not giving us their best.

No wonder Poland’s so happy.

Criminal, white-collar and road offences totalled 404,000 in the first half of this year, decreasing by 29,000 year on year.

Thefts numbered 47,000 from January to June 2018, falling by 7,200 year on year.

Car thefts reached 4,500, dropping by 600. Robberies and acts of extortion decreased by nearly 1,000. The police also recorded fewer robberies with the use of a weapon or other dangerous instrument.

Andrzej Borowiak, spokesperson for the police force in the central Wielkopolska province said: “We are glad to see a drop in incidents such as assaults or property damage.”

“In the Wielkopolska province the crime rate fell over 10 percent, which is a significant shift,” he added.

Meanwhile, in the eastern Lubelskie province the crime rate dropped 16 percent, Renata Laszczka-Rusek, spokesperson for the local police, told Rzeczpospolita.

If Poland’s getting so nationalist, when are they taking their people back?

Don’t they want them?

Nobody asks this. Because they’re weak.

Brain drain is a myth, duh.

https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Crime_statistics#Home_burglaries_down_by_10_.25_between_2012_and_2016

Over 350 per 100k here, closer to 30 per 100k in Poland.

Did their criminals just magically disappear?

Do your research.

I am only salty for good reason, after reading a lot of data.

Get on a plane and fuck a Polish whore if you want, don’t bring them here to rob me and then have the brass cheek to complain about immigrants. I used to think they were nice too, they ALL do that nice routine until they take over an area. Then they seem to turn but the appeasement (r-selected) was always fake.

Look at the stats out there. We’re being played.

Figure it out now, or when your life could depend on it during a global recession.

Sexual predators pretty much general criminals too

Why the death penalty is a good idea, clinical side:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12616928

Trait empathy and criminal versatility in sexual offenders.

Associations between trait empathy and criminal versatility were examined in a sample of 88 incarcerated adult sexual offenders (29 extrafamilial child molesters, 26 intrafamilial child molesters, and 33 rapists). Considerable criminal versatility was observed, with 60% of the whole sample and 88% of recidivist offenders having previous convictions for nonsexual offenses. Regression analyses showed significant associations between trait empathy and nonsexual offense convictions, but not between trait empathy and sexual offense convictions. More specifically, greater involvement in violent offending (e.g., assault, robbery) was associated with lower levels of empathic concern and higher levels of fantasy. Greater involvement in miscellaneous (e.g., traffic, drug, public order) offending was associated with lower levels of empathic concern. We argue that insufficient theoretical and empirical attention has historically been given to criminal versatility among sexual offenders, especially among child molesters. In particular, we suggest that developments in empathy training for sexual offenders may benefit from distinguishing needs of criminally versatile and non-versatile sexual offenders. More knowledge about trait empathy in sexual offenders, and about situational factors that may override otherwise normal empathic responsiveness, is needed.

Nice to know misogynists are related to pedophiles.

If you don’t ‘think’ a rapist is sexist, I dunno what to tell ya.

You’re probably a misogynist?

It’s odd because most pedophiles are male on male, typically, so two sides of the same coin?

So pedophiles are just misandrists who find it easier to target physically weaker boys? Is that their tactic? While misogynists go more for adult women, being weaker but easier to plausibly deny as ‘consenting’.

Previously, rapists would claim not to know the victim… until DNA.

If empathy must be trained, which it cannot be (brain development, neural pruning) maybe those “incapable” of not attacking people should be put down like dogs, that keep attacking people. You don’t “lose” your temper, you choose to attack someone. Rape isn’t an accident, you hypoagency-pushing liars. If they’re a danger to society and for some obscure, rare, brain damaged reason cannot actually control themselves, they should be locked up in asylums. 

Impulse control is a choice.

Over-ride seems to imply all men as rapists just waiting for an opportunity. BULLSHIT.

My hunger can overwhelm my urge not to steal a croissant… wait, I don’t do that, because that’s crazy. You don’t get to blame the world for your personal weakness.

Muh Dick is invalid.

r-types expose themselves

“It’s you, not me!”

spot the r-type is a fun game

slippery slope is not a fallacy, it’s pushing tolerance for evil

first it’s about letting your son be a manwhore, spreading STDs like a gay guy, causing various aborted pregnancies and without consequence, shun marriage

next thing you know he’s dressed in drag and eyeing the family dog

lefties wanna hook ’em young because if everyone’s doing it, they imagine they can avoid consequences forever

muh sexual expression has no limits, zero limits, there isn’t a level of depravity they won’t hit eventually for novelty thrills

When the Midwest receives demands from Dem voters for food, remember this.

“we explained” excuses don’t make a thing less evil

Never look at their behaviour and hold them accountable. Nope.

Don’t look at the Biblical list of crimes and wonder whether they’re there for a reason.

 

Before Rotherham

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2443705.stm
“Officers have also been surprised that most of those arrested are professional people with no previous police record.”
Serial bullies in the workplace. They don’t stop being toxic, it just mutates to the situation. Abusers in the street are likely to be abusers at home are likely to be abusers at work, but the crime data doesn’t account for repeat offender cases, it goes by instance of particular event and splits it all up. There are fewer of these people than we think and we can round them up with the will.
Did they all attend the same “leadership” seminars?
“Detective Superintendent Jon Hesketh of West Midlands Police said many of those identified as suspects were working as teachers, police officers and in other jobs giving them access to children.”
And ‘power’ to grope and strip people.
“He said he had been “incredibly surprised by the number of people and by the occupations of those people and the positions they held”.”
Attracted to power, a predator? How shocking.
“Thomas Reedy, who ran the website and made millions from it, is now serving a sentence of 1,335 years.”
Lead is cheap?
“The officers said they sympathised with their British colleagues’ lack of resources.
But they questioned what could be more important than protecting children from horrific sexual abuse.”
This is why I pray QAnon has some truth to it.
Considering the pornographic conversion efforts extensively noted online elsewhere, it’s a wonder the tool of “free” (age of consent-less) porn is legal but…. what do I know?

They’ve even managed to groom children into making pornography of themselves!

(“nudes” used to be an art term)

The pedophiles love how the law has made exceptions for this child pornography from minor to minor, much like rape (no age of consent reached) minor to minor goaded by Sex Instruction* at school, it’ll make the case to abolish consent law easier. It used to be in all cases of rape, including adult, consent was never presumed. Now contrary to the law, everyone is assumed by pop culture to be a slut and this plays into the hands of rapists who cannot evade DNA evidence**. Global gaslighting, how empowering.

Shaming the normal, with the common sense of prudence and self-respect, while celebrating the deviant that corrupts the idiots, with a host of psychiatric complaints. The latter is Hollywood, the world’s largest asylum. Trust nobody who wants to live among that mess.

It’s an amazing con:

Hand a child a spying camera attached to an internet-connected phone and tell them taking softcore porn photos of themselves will make them popular. (Just don’t give the game away by calling it softcore porn, they might grow a conscience or expect money). Why else would smartphones be sold to minors?

One generation ago parents feared the worst was stripping. Better a stripper than amateur porn.

*Biology was the subject, grooming and making it personal was not necessary. If it looks like the ideology of sexual predators, and encourages activity (incitement) like sexual predators, it is.

**Previously, they’d claim it was made-up and the event never took place.

People who believe in nurture and no nature – what do they imagine porn trains us for?

#bonobolife

And why has the encouraged rise of porn consumption (sex scenes are now in kid’s films) correlated strongly to the demise of the nuclear family?

Women get prison for sexual humiliation of a man

Throw away the key. It must have been horrific.

I post these stories to prove that 1. there are terrible White people and I don’t stick up for these tarts, 2. the law is equally applied for these crimes but owing to 3. the numbers of one sex committing a crime (perps) are skewed, you rarely see it. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen, there is justice on sexual crime and we can’t be silent. I may fit into the same category as these white women but I’m not about to defend their actions like feminists, SJWs and MRAs or MGTOWs would suggest. If it’s wrong, it’s wrong, whoever does it.

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/570073/Girl-gang-sex-attack-on-footballer-jail-time-bizarre-sex-assault-footballer-star

Standards apply to everyone. This is the First World and we need to act like it.

Harassment still illegal but apparently women need extra protection

This is silly. I saw some anti-fems complaining about it and it made no sense

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/county-in-uk-makes-it-a-hate-crime-to-upset-women/article/2596356

It’s already illegal.

Harassment, assault, stalking.

I got a tingling sensation in my Bullshit O’Meter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demography_of_Nottingham#Ethnicity

28.46% non-white.

There’s your necessity.

In an effort to crack down on the alleged “tidal wave of abuse and harassment” women face every day, the county’s police force is now considering things like catcalling and pickup lines to be a hate crime if they are directed toward a woman from a man.

They’re never directed the other way and those things are already illegal, they just made it official.
Because you don’t see it the other way, they didn’t mention it.
However, a woman groping a man on public transport? Illegal.
A woman stalker? They happen to celebrities most famously, illegal.
Women being chucked out by a bouncer for refusing to take No for a reply? I’ve seen that more often than the man equivalent because women assume they won’t be hurt or punished for doing it. Illegal, police can be called.

The law is being applied equally but the crime is not practiced by both sexes in the same manner.

includes behavior targeted towards a woman by men simply because they are a woman.

antisocial behaviour
already illegal
however, hate crime is largely hinged on targeting, so yes, it would be, just like the Rotherham rapists going for white girls
it’s part of their motivation, since nobody can help what they were born
we can’t suddenly become men whatever surgery is available
the anti-fems are usually smarter than this…

Of course, that could include anything a woman deems offensive or unwanted from a man. It’s completely subjective.

Exactly. All crimes are on a case-by-case basis. We have these things called judges and juries to sort it out? Not public opinion, or even personal opinion?
Assault is completely subjective according to our law.
Men commit most crimes, this is an expected pattern that they would be the main perp. In any crime. Based on stats.

Newsweek reports that now “everything from verbal comments to unwanted physical approaches” will be considered a hate crime. Send a woman a text when she doesn’t like you? Hate crime. Tell your female friend she looks good today? Hate crime.

That’s hysterical over-reaction. From ‘men’. [or someone who panders to the insecure ones]
You are not forced to make lewd comments (always illegal) nor block someone’s physical space or prevent them from moving, say by grabbing (always illegal). Even our police cannot do those things, see kettling, they’re wearing body cams now. Pick-up endorses these things as building rapport, being an alpha dog and ‘escalating’ ‘kino’. …If the internet told you to jump off a cliff….
How could sending a text be illegal if she gave you her number? Did you take the number? Illegal.
If she’s your friend, why would she report you? How is ‘looking good’ an insult??? [This one nonsense example makes more sense further down when you see the ‘journalist’]

The MGTOW-pandering lot want something to complain about again. This isn’t even in your country. You said something had to be done post-Rotherham, this is part of it. Mind your own shit. You have riots, plural.

The only thing mentioned in the Newsweek article that even remotely sounds like it merits the time of police officers is when a man takes a photo of a woman without her consent. Depending on the type of photo and reason for taking it, that can be disgusting.

We don’t base our laws on how it sounds like to skanky Americans?
Without her consent is the entire frickin’ point. Without. As in, cannot obtain. As in, denied.

Erm it isn’t about what makes the man feel comfortable – that’s the point. If you go up to any stranger and cause public disturbance they could report you, whatever your sex or sexuality or fetishes. Begging is illegal, so is soliciting. This is in keeping with the antique laws, old as paper. We are not a high trust society. You can’t expect to be welcomed by strangers, that is unreasonable, entitled and egoistic/emotional. Women are the ones being approached, not their choice, 99% of the time it’s that way around, the ‘men’ in question do NOT listen when told by a fellow citizen to respect their right to be left in peace because of this shit they read online, and then, as these twerps remind us, all women are in physical danger of rape, so we need to be extra vigilant to potential rapists and protect ourselves.

Pick one. Stranger danger or men do their damn job if they’re claiming to be so masculine.
How do we protect ourselves? Well, we banned guns, most knives, we can’t touch one another, so words will have to do. Fire with fire.

That includes telling a creepy stranger who clearly only wants a free hooker and to comment on your body like parts at a butcher to go fuck himself. Men don’t like being treated this way either, they find it humiliating, demeaning and emasculating.* Real life is not porn. There is no entitlement to sex. They could just leave a card and say nothing but where does it call that illegal? Nowhere! Instead they want to reduce the rights of women in the First World. Unmarried women, because it’s less likely they’ll get beaten up by relations, but I’ve seen it tried on married ones too. Those people are trash. Do not defend them, even vicariously.
Those photos are often posted online, another crime. Upskirts on porn sites for example. Faces are shown, identifying information like locations and bus routes. Do most men wear skirts? No, but I’m sure the law would also be applied to upskirts of a man in a kilt if you want to get decked by a Scotsman. Please, go ahead, internet toughie.

There was no intent to disrespect the unknown woman, but now, just because a man took the photo, that could be a hate crime.

Yanks and your emphasis on bloody opinions. High off your own gas. That sounds like a great legal defense, I didn’t mean to. Truly, superb. I didn’t mean to corner her and grab her and refuse to leave her alone when asked. There was no intent to disrespect in any of that behaviour, judge.

Filming in public is illegal, I covered this with pick-up artists filming in London.
Photos can be incitement of harassment or simply derogatory, libelous to the reputation. Especially with lewd comments. Getting the picture? Actions have consequences. If it gives you a sexual thrill from a stranger, it’s probably illegal e.g. frottage. Your ignorance of our law does not excuse that.

All those whiny outrage feminist articles that most people laugh off as first world problems are now influencing actual criminal law.

Look up the actual criminal law.
Fucking spergs. Shoot these people with the anarchists, they’re a waste of air.
Protecting people is so bigoted! ~ retards

If a Muslim comes up to your 9 year old niece and asks a lewd question, this law would protect her. We don’t have guns and almost no right to physically defend ourselves. What else is there, darling?
It’s a reaction to the cultures they freely admit are truly misogynistic. As in, women as cattle-whores. With no choice, so keep trying it on. Any unchaperoned woman is fair game to rape. Okay, side with those people, but don’t pretend your incentive is First World freedoms.

There is no arguing against this if you look it up. Journalists do research, not this vacuous bitching.

Shockingly, domestic abuse won’t be considered a hate crime, even though it is an objectively offensive crime, because it has its own established procedure. Go figure.

Number one. OPINION IS NOT LAW. Ahem.

It won’t be considered a (new) crime (on the books) because it’s already a crime with all the full statutes to cover it, isn’t that TERRIBLE?!

Checkmate, feminazis! You already protect women in the comfort of their own home!

what wtf wut confused shocked are you seeing this omfg how

Also, men are protected from being battered by their spouses too! Because that happens and the law recognizes it! The UK legal system hates men and this is PROOF! ahahahahaha!

“Understanding this as a hate crime will help people to see the seriousness of these incidents and hopefully encourage more women to come forward and report offences.”

Guess the perps. Why would they be afraid of reporting white men in their own country?
Because it isn’t mostly white men committing these crimes.
It’s those who prey on white meat. Sure, screw the harassers whatever their race, same with all criminals, but sexual crime isn’t fine if the perp is a white male. There are no Get Out Of Jail Free cards, unless you’re really arguing for some kind of institutional, legally valid white privilege?

“Women and girls face a tidal wave of abuse and harassment every day. Our law has to send a clear signal that this is not acceptable. It is a crime.”

That woman quoted as if she is wrong, is correct. It’s a re-codification and clarification of the law, this happens locally all the time (case law?). I may think hate crime logic is flawed, severely, but if you’re gonna have it, it’d be a good idea for places like Sweden or Germany to take it up, don’t you think?
The purpose is to DETER more serious crimes, by people who already don’t respect the law of this country.

…who could that be?????

It protects the white women because the men aren’t doing it.

omg really wtf go away no audrey

This will become common, and necessary, as things get worse.

Sure, blame us. Blame the victims. You want tradition, though, right? As long as you don’t have to get off your arse.

It must be nice to have so little actual crime that the police can focus on such things.

It sounds like the nasal tone of a bitchy pajama boy. I could also go into a Swiss bank wearing a ski mask and holding a black water pistol. I don’t because that is a stupid thing to do. Do not act like a rapist if you are not a rapist. If women must protect ourselves, the law must support us in that endeavor because the men forsook their sex’s historical duty.
If women are victims, should the police laugh it off? But when the NYE attacks happened it was all “they’re hurting our women! we must stop this! we need more laws!”

The real question: why do you assume your behaviour toward women would get you into legal trouble?

Wouldn’t the judge let you off, if you truly did nothing wrong?
It’s like the ones who say I just wanted to buy her a drink as if that was really It and spiking drinks doesn’t happen. Women are not under any obligation to accept attentions from men, it is dangerous. That’s why men threaten women with rape online, when we can’t even see who it is but they can see us. Playing I’m Not Like the Other Guys snowflake routine doesn’t work, because you are a stranger. The rapists say that too. The ones so nice they have to remind you/tell you how Nice they are, because you can’t be trusted to form that opinion by yourself. Nobody should be given the benefit of the doubt where matters of physical safety are concerned. This isn’t even a sexual point, it’s common sense.

Freedom of association. Freedom. As in, everyone. Nothing to do with voting rights (suffrage was universal, not female) or emotionality (ostrogen is not the emotion hormone, if anything that’s testosterone with clear forensic links to crime and mental instability). There’s really no such thing as too much oestrogen in women, and in men it’s actually too little testosterone, rather than oestrogen, causing their health problems. HBD doesn’t care about your feels. “Estrogen is partly responsible for creating healthy sperm” #science

Do you remember what the excuse was, of the Rotherham rapists to the police?
They’re our girlfriend.
How was this possible?

They picked her up. Between ‘home’ and school. Pick-ups. Literal. In taxis. 

They go on to mention an online poll, about online stuff.
As if that has anything to do with this.
Online. Aka not in public. Not a law. Not even English.

Then-

That actually makes this law misandrist, since only men can be the perpetrators even though women are guilty as well.

It doesn’t say that and case law, a single case, could easily disprove it. With the help of the Equality Act, you silly Yank.
‘That’ says nothing but triggered opinion. You and your specious non sequiturs.

As we’ve seen time and time again from outrage feminists [American] on social media [online], any criticism of a woman is misogyny [patently false]. That would make this article misogynist [if you say so?], but I wouldn’t be prosecuted [but…you just said… it broke a law] — not just because I don’t live in Nottinghamshire [you don’t need to, it’s called a holiday?] — but also because I’m a woman. [nope, a lesbian would also be guilty of harassing women, you utter prat]

This guy (sperg logic, more masculine) is as retarded as Lindy West.
Even she wouldn’t go that far into Whataboutism derailment combined with What IF.
I often slag off male opinions on this topic when they’re wrong, because men are usually the only ones discussing these things. This is an example of a dippy conservative cuck, shilling for shekels like the best Jezebel tarts.

Wait, so all this being triggered is still from a woman, objecting to misogyny objections, even though there’s no feminists in sight?

….Wow America. You used to be cool.
She’s actually siding on the same side as ISIS, because America.

Kevin-Hart-Really-o rlly lies

It’s like a Yank right-wing Claudia Boleyn, she assumes that anything protecting women is automatically bad and wrong based on her political position (more insulting, as true conservatives do not hate women) but actually Claudia is more logical than this person.

It’s almost as if we abandoned our moral standards and manners, and then panicked over their absence and are now trying to bring them back in the form of legislation.

WE?

OUR?

Whither this liberal universalism henceforth stench?

Who is dis bich?

Let’s take bets, shall we?

Well, that explains everything.

Well, that explains everything.

Her message is Don’t listen to stupid women – unless they’re me.

She’s jealous of the women who actually get hit on, regardless of the danger involved. No wonder she hates feminists. Narcissism of small differences, isn’t it?

Spot the difference.

Spot the difference.

We have a self-hating women vying for male attention by insulting herself like a male feminist/self-hating beta and a man-hating woman who wants to fuck men out of revenge by taking their own money to make it possible.

“I’m on Instagram because of peer pressure” reads her Instagram bio.
Yes, her politics are informed by similar concerns.

She is living proof that she is wrong but sees no contradiction.

Women don’t think like me. aka I’m special. You’re a woman. Technically. Proving women can and do, in fact, have differing opinions. Like men. I’m careful to say feminist when I mean feminist, not woman. It’s silly to assume someone always takes a position for sexual attention (like White Knighting) as if there are opinions you can’t hold for logical reasons, but in this case…

Why do I think she’s attention-seeking for her career?
Well before, a few years ago, she was covering such important political topics as milk.

http://townhall.com/columnists/asheschow/2012/08/13/when_did_milk_become_bad_for_you

I will refrain from the obvious joke about guzzling approval.

She also cosplays. According to search engines.

I wonder, if a Muslim were to harass her in this costume, whether she’d be asking for it?

Tbf, she denies it. I doubt that’s her arse neither. Otherwise she’d know about harassment firsthand.

Whatever, point still stands. If that was her in the picture, feel free to harass her whatever she is wearing or doing or even if she asks you to stop, because women are never legitimately the victims of bad men since feminists exist.

All men are good and would never harass, stalk or rape women!
Ignore those pesky crime data reports!

That isn’t just as retarded as the All Victim narrative!
No Victims, heard it here first.

*http://metro.co.uk/2015/06/06/this-is-what-happened-when-a-woman-catcall-men-5233425/
They only included the ones in this reel where men liked it. Try it in real life. Ask random men to smile in the street and watch their Wow you creep reaction. Whoever does it. Have a load of regular feminists go up to men and paw at them, building kino. I said if they wanted to ruin Roosh V, they’d follow him around copying him. Forever. And distribute his step-by-steps in public flyers. Well, if it’s legal and morally acceptable, no problem right? So they can’t complain when other men hit on them because that’s misandrist. Men get to hit on whoever they want, including other men. Watch what happens when we take the brakes off gay rapists.

harassment

No, that is exactly what men do nowadays. They call it banter or lad culture, it isn’t. They walk up to women and speak like that, like they’re in porn. I find recording them makes them go away because they know there’s something to be ashamed of. This law is supposed to make them confine that stuff to anonymous internet comments where it’s less likely to escalate and easier to prove. Young men talking the way rappers only used to get away with in music videos.

It’s an American expectation based on tipping culture, antidepressant culture with pills to make you smiley and the power dynamic of servers. A random woman in the street is not angling for a tip, any tip. A neutral expression is not sad. I once heard a model describe it thus when recounting one instance, “No, I won’t smile at you because I’m not serving you. In fact, I’m better than you because you need my approval and you’ll never have it.”
If women don’t smile at you, maybe you’re the reason?

Any random person talking to you in public is weird. Doesn’t need to be sexual.

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/northerner-terrorised-london-by-saying-hello-20151001102473

the world is not America
women do need protection, that isn’t saying men do not
also, women need a labour ward, is this sexist?

these people are still crying sexism for any acknowledgement of differences but also trying to argue the feminist crying is wrong because logic and differences? Idiots.

Modern lechery

modernlechery

The anti-feminists fail when they fail to see crime as a problem when the perpetrator is male and their excuse is hedonism.

There’s salacious and then there’s inhuman.

You’d think the so-called traditionalists would be anti- these things because they are all the byproduct of a heavily sexualised culture. Alas, hedonism lies.

For example “forced to have sex” = rape. Coercion obviates consent.

These are the fruits of the sexual revolution and they’re all rotten to the core.

Psychologically, any man with a willing woman in front of him who wants to stick it in the other hole is kidding himself about his sexuality and doesn’t get to use any evolutionary argument regarding women, ever. It’s an exit, not an entrance.

Men have no respect for women anymore but it began when they lost respect for themselves. It’s projected onto women. For example, if you ask for nudes, you don’t get to bitch about the acquiescence to your request.

The harm of pornography will take decades to understand in any… depth. Sorry. And porn is cheating according to none other than The Bible (viewing with lust).

Women, if he says differently, watch gay porn. All the time. At breakfast. In the bedroom instead of sleeping. In the garden, volume turned right up. Nothing to be ashamed of, right? No addiction here. These men also love anal so they can’t object, right? You’re watching the experts at work.

Modern women are so disrespected they’ve lost sight of the difference between pleasing a man (feminine) and being controlled by a man (who isn’t even their husband so they owe him nothing, also it’s abuse).

The manosphere doesn’t help itself by portraying all women’s issues are shrill hysteria.
No wonder regular people switch off when they try to wield the rhetoric of male abuse when they laugh at that of women. The behaviour is evil, the prevalence determines the examples used. Welcome to English.

Video: The feminist rape myth (obviously it’s a sexual crime)

It’s based in Freudian beliefs to see everything about sex- except sex. Where crime is concerned, that is BS.

Rape is both a violent crime AND, primarily, a sexual crime.

Think of male prison rape. You beat the guy over the head with a lead pipe? Violent crime. You beat the guy with the head of your pipe? Sexual crime.

Essentially, the people who push this want the sexual implications removed as an aggravating factor in sentencing. When a criminal decides to do crime A over B, there is a rationale. Evil, but logical.

Rape is committed by (usually men) too weak to work for it, with high time preference, no conscience and so little sexual allure that this is the only mating strategy that might allow them to procreate.

The feminists have a dual purpose – where they can also square sexual attractiveness away from…. sexual crime.

what wtf blackadder

It’s based in the ultimate property ownership of ONE’S OWN BODY.