Orientation, amygdala?


We need volume studies.

h/t Anonymous Conservative

Note: would apply to homosexuality/heterosexuality, not paraphilias.

They argue from ignorance all the time, lamenting the studies don’t exist.

Because they refuse to do them.

“About one in seven (14 percent) claimed that their orientation had changed from exclusively homosexual to exclusively heterosexual”

Control for porn addiction and that would go up.

Think about it, your orgasms are being trained to respond to a man’s manhood.

Pavlov’s penis. The cue shouldn’t be another man.

Then there’s actually a phobia of women rooted in childhood abuse.

Again, control for that and again, success rates would soar.

If you’d do it with a woman, why not a man?

Logically, there is no way to deny that. Sexual acts are based on body parts.

You can have sex with men and not be homo, somehow!

What is a bro job? And why are they so popular?  

Orientation? Based on behaviour?

They wanted your straight men. We warned you.

Straight men are the ultimate catch for gays, there are forums discussing poaching them. (1)

Porn has been used this entire time. Any unusual form of sex will be twisted as queer.

Now it’s you can give oral to a man and not be gay, despite gay men being defined by that.

Next, it’s anal or fingering or rimming. For women, it was kiss a girl and like it.

Anything bro is tainted, pun intended. It will always end up a sexual lure. That’s the male weakness. Notice how many “BRO-triarchy” alt right writers are totally homosexual and anti-family? The fellowship of the bros thing has one purpose: trap straight men into a gay orgy. No girls allowed. Call it a Viking bonding experience and drug them. A false flag “party” because rape victims saying they were drunk get no sympathy.

Suddenly, all the misogyny makes sense!

Have you counted how disproportionately “pagan” men are homo? Did this ring NO bells for you whatsoever? All the night time, strong alcohol bonding experiences in the middle of nowhere didn’t twitch your sense of rape danger?

BTW, oral sex (with anyone) unprotected is leading to the spread of STDs, more than any other kind.

“Don’t knock it until you tried it” assumes everyone is pansexual or whatever the trendy term for slut without standards is. It assumes you can’t be trusted to know your own sexuality.

Warned ya.



“Yeah. it’s quite possible to turn a str8 man gay.
Out of sheer curiosity, the right situation, and the right person can easily tunr a str8 gay man gay.”

Believe us now?

“Merely thinking about it doesn’t make you gay but when thought turns into a reality then you have yourself a whole different story. Alot of str8 guys are under the assumption that merely getting head from another guy doesn’t make them gay. It’s a nice ythought but they are wrong and usually those are the kind of guys woyu wanna be weary of because they don’t seem to unbderstand the sexual nature of what it is to be gay.”

Yeah, you want the hardest catch, the really straight ones!

Use your Google-fu, Neo!

The most common question most str8 guys ask are “Do guys do it better?”. [2]

What the F do you think they’re going to say?

It’s like asking the Big Bad Wolf what you taste like.

Do not ask a sexual predator if they’re good in bed!


No, they don’t. I asked some very, very, very, very slutty bi guys.
That’s why they tend to settle with women and prefer dating women.

In technical terms, the disease risk is high, they’re normally high and come too quickly and they’re completely selfish lovers.

Did we all learn something today? Good.

Look up the predatory questions.

Men are in as much danger as women.

Fact: Brotherhoods are totally straight and family-oriented, they are father support groups. Anything less is not a brotherhood, you cannot have a brotherhood of bachelors (a school or monastery) or gays (that’s call a sex club or a gay bar).

Musical interlude to ponder this issue.

Update: the “it’s what you’re attracted to” thing (lie) is like trying to measure the financial cost of window shopping. It isn’t shopping. For the same reason daydreaming about UFOs doesn’t mean you were abducted. Sexuality is Darwinian, objective and observable behaviour. Anything else, is something else and unscientific emotional appeal. They say that, the sexual predators, to exploit curiosity. None of the phrases about curiosity are positive (kill the cat).

Bringing alcohol into it changes nothing. It also implies consent issues. And what, do all gay men need to be off their face, that’s insulting…?

A penguin doesn’t feel “attraction” and attraction isn’t a mental process, it’s a physical one. Sexuality is an instinctive drive. You can have the hots for someone you do not like as a human being, they are separate. Lust is not love. You can’t ask a gay penguin what it’s attracted to or what it kids itself into identifying with for social desirability (lie).

If you are physically capable of performing certain acts with a type of person, that is ALL sexuality is. If you cannot muster the physical capability (psychological and physiological) then you are not that thing.

To avoid confusion and despicable lies.

A homosexual man is physically capable of performing sexual acts with men and not women.

A bisexual man is physically capable of performing sexual acts with either men or women.

A heterosexual man is only physically capable of performing sexual acts with women and not men.


Stop kidding yourselves. The fact you’re happy to watch a man fucking in porn (not repulsed, disgusted, turned off) shows a lot of these men are bi and in denial. There is no curiosity. If you’re curious, you are bi. Stop with the denial.

It’s like saying you tried cuckoldry at an orgy. No, you are a cuck. It is defined by practice. The Hollywood orgy types are literally all cucks. Elon sharing Amber round like a joint is a cuck, Talulah sharing round Elon is a cuck.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckquean That is literally all it is.

The “try something before deciding you don’t like it” thing is ridiculous. If you kill a few people to see if you like it and change your mind, are you any less a serial killer? In most interviews, they admit to just trying it out, that’s their motive. If you do heroin, five times and drop it, are you less a heroin user? You cannot magically scrub yourself clean of bad behaviours by writing it up as a “mistake” like Cindy from CA, life doesn’t work like that. It’s called a delusion. It’s still a part of you and always will be.

So much for the “don’t be ashamed” or “if you disapprove you must secretly be one” group.

We are the most oppressed people sexually in all of history, because we are lied to, encouraged to put ourselves in vulnerable, easily abused positions because other people like the idea of it (we should perform it for them) and we cannot openly discuss sexual disgust and interpersonal repulsion. Yay, so free! I feel liberated, don’t you!?

Where saying No makes the targeted party feel bad.

Say No to the wrong lech and you might get arrested for a hate crime.

Everybody belongs to everybody else? No. No means no. Old people are not entitled to young ones, ugly to good-looking, fat to thin, gay to straight. No is the only word you need to master and if you can’t, you’re a slave. A slave is a person who cannot refuse.

Any wonder young people are striking? Passivity is the punishment.
Since you cannot explain, you are not allowed to say anything.

the r in Refugees Welcome signs + funnies

Look at the facial expression in the Bible quote. That’s an atheist going to Hell for blasphemy.

Spliced with photo of actual ‘refugees’. A picture is worth a thousand words.

Hopefully the Manchester attack, nail-bombing little girls has redpilled these feminists.
Somehow I doubt it. This is the one that started it all.

This one in particular triggers me, the way to kill it is with apathy: So?

So was Jack the Ripper, so was Hitler, so is Trump. Tired of whataboutism.

“they are us, we are them”


Meanwhile, actual refugees

Yeah, let’s not save these people waving round the white flag of Christendom.

Are they welcome in YOUR home? Why not?

JK Rowling has yet to take in any ‘refugees’ that someone offered to pay to fly to her homes!

She is irrelevant. Like…

Emma Watson hasn’t spent a night in the Calais camp alone, without security.

Locks are racist! No borders? No walls! Let’s all live in pagodas! 

Now a series of triggering memes and funnies.

It’s been a while. 120 funnies. Some repeats. A few serious.

about as real as her hair

Going by her Coco the Clown makeup, I think they do.

The People do not consent to open borders. The native people.

Everyone into Lord of the Rings.

All harassment is bad but sexual harassment is the worst.
It’s the First World, fucking act like it.
Recently, a German woman was beaten by a ‘migrant’, because she told him not to call her a bitch.

Tesla’s expression, my fucking sides.

He never said that but yes. Fitness is in adaptation.

Just like consciousness. You can’t touch it or test it. It’s unfalsifiable. It’s the scientific concept of spirit.
It isn’t scientific though.

Sexual orientation theory is BS. There’s only behaviour – which hole is your goal?

SJW’s playbook.

The alt-lite treats the J-word as their N.

And strange brown men on the street.

The temporary alliance of SJWs and Muslims is simple: the sexually entitled support the sexually entitled.
Also take down White Man but obviously, SJWs aren’t white or men, typically.

Comic: The Left’s cognitive dissonance on sexuality and trans


Credit: Liberal Trendies

Did I say cognitive dissonance? That deeps it means insanity.

Also, ‘you shouldn’t use transsexual, that means something different’, until you talk about it negatively for scientific reasons, then it’s suddenly synonymous with transgender and other groups…. And also, ‘absolutely nothing to do with sexuality’, ignore …The Facts.


Porn tastes slay orientation theory


It made sense for biology, to explain behaviour. It’s Darwinian, to reproduce or not.

Now it’s become an excuse to be all talk, “I identify” so you have bizarre findings like this, and ‘heterosexual men’ also dubbed ‘Men Who Have Sex With Men’.

The push to accept pedophilia

Predators all operate in the same way.

It starts like a certain religion, with children.

Step One of Infiltration: “We’re harmless!”

Like the Big Bad Wolf in nana’s dress. The Trojan (sorry) Horse. They say they want to live in peace, while constantly stirring up trouble. Peace is code for ‘Leave me alone whatever I do’.

Then comes the request.

Step Two: “Pity me.”

Rhetorical, appeal to emotion. “Real” victim, by existing. And probably money. They get you to trust them, make their deviance socially acceptable. This way, they can get close to authorities e.g. the classic single mother, the social workers whoring off helpless orphans as having ‘boyfriends’, prevent teachers from reporting them or just freely search for victims to target.

Then finally, what they’ve been working up to…..

“Let me in.”

They say ‘You can’t choose who you’re attracted to.’ As if you can rape anyone you’re attracted to in the street a la Roosh’s ‘satire’. As if people don’t have rights, and private bodies, and physical attraction cannot be ignored.

Actually, sexual tastes are mutable/fluid/changeable/trendy/fashionable, as porn users have proven in various studies. You seek what you feed. A man seeks out anal porn, they’ve turned themselves homosexual. They’re conditioning themselves, training their body’s sexual response cycle. A man seeks out goat porn, child porn, etc. They choose to orgasm to these deplorable things, out of personal weakness. You may hear them say they are shocked by those things, not sexually aroused. Okay, then why touch your junk while viewing it? Nowadays, it is common for men to consider that masturbation requires porn… a view pushed by degenerates, wishing for new recruits, knowing about the desensitization cycle because slippery slope does apply to physical stimulation. Like going to the gym and building muscle. You load on more until you buckle. The body is one big input and output machine. Sex is the biggest carrot (sorry) of incentive in behaviourism. It builds Empires and destroys them.

If you take up babysitting jobs while fantasizing about little girls, you don’t get to blame other people for being ‘bigoted’. Projection of guilt doesn’t work. He already lied to himself, to other people, stalked around his chosen demo, scoped a target, and engineered a situation where he could commit a crime. That is 100% him.

Hold adults responsible for their actions, victim culture is based on infantilization, babying people and holding them to lesser standards. Standards are not ‘unfair’, they are necessary if you want respect. Sometimes I get accusations of being sexist toward men. It isn’t my fault men commit the majority of sexual crimes. That is my exact point. They are 100% responsible for their actions, including the oven-worthy ones. As are women when they rarely make those evil choices  e.g. https://www.icetrend.com/morgue-worker-arrested-after-giving-birth-to-a-dead-mans-baby/

Evil isn’t a male/female/Christian/Muslim/Hindu/atheist/whatever thing. That is my exact point, exactly. It is a choice, which everyone has. If you cannot accept the responsibility of adult choices, you do not get the rights associated with adulthood either e.g. the ability to consent to sex, a choice. Such people are correct, they should be treated like children – but with no half measures. Hence, the asylum was made, to give these people the peace they needed.

Briefly, on stigma.

Every time I see a BS argument about ‘ending stigma’ like a mean rumour on the playground, in practice trying to blame other people for being the victim and reacting as such to unacceptable behaviour from the sick who inconsiderately refuse to get help or take their meds, I know I’m seeing a person that has never witnessed true mental disease. Psychiatry follows the Medical Model. Mental illness, is also mental disease. They are the same thing in synonym and in theoretical backing. Like client and patient refer to the same person. It’s like someone with Black Death who visits family, not caring if someone else gets hurt. At best, they’re terrible sociopaths lacking remorse and empathy in spreading it by choice (cough HIV cough). They should seek solitude and treatment until they are safe for society.
Depression isn’t someone posting crying emoji on social media. Psychosis isn’t limited to thinking you shit unicorn sprinkles. Mania isn’t painting pretty swirly pictures with cutesy hashtags. Depression is a mother drowning her baby because the father refused to co-parent and there aren’t enough hours in the day alone*. Psychosis is murdering your parents because they refused to make you Mac n Cheese so they were obviously demons. Mania is jumping off a building because they thought they were could fly on the power of good intentions. Enabling those sick people for your own ego is also sick. Sick people require treatment, this is common sense. If they don’t require treatment, they are not sick, and therefore, require no sympathy, as they are perfectly well and simply bad at coping with everyday stressors. As many people are without bellyaching about it and promptly seek mechanisms to forever fix their own issue, responsibly. Stigma is the sane reaction to the insane. Diseased people are dangerous, whether the illness is mental or physical. You cannot guilt people into placing themselves in harm’s way. That is wrong.

Abnormality isn’t any excuse for criminality. The law is not a guide on what is psychologically healthy.

Back to pedophiles.

Acceptance, it starts. Everybody accepts that degenerates exist. We have the internet. We know you’re there. What they mean is Accept me in your life.

Against freedom of association and its less-discussed flipside, the Right to Ostracize. 

Eventually they move onto celebration, but all the parades in the world won’t quiet that little voice inside called a Conscience. They don’t like the idea of God because God sees all, even the things that person is in denial of while it is convenient.

But if it’s something you can’t help, there’s nothing to celebrate. If it’s a medical condition, it needs to be kept private for treatment. Otherwise social pressure comes in. That’s why therapists must be confidential, because even their balanced account will bias the recovery. These people slander themselves, happily. They are quite stupid. Reputation has repercussions. You want to write about rape in a lascivious tone? People will think you’re a rapist. You want to write about abusing little girls? People will think you’re a pedophile. Nobody forced you dudes.

It’s like how the self-styled ‘pansexuals’ love orientation theory, although an All option is an impossible orientation (it’s like a sphere as a degree) but then they begin listing all the things they aren’t into. When Pan means all. So no, the meaning of the word implies you are a necrophile, and a pedophile, and into bestiality. That is the meaning of the word. If you use that choice of word, you are going to be considered among that lot. Personal definitions don’t apply to the public. You don’t get to play thought police.

Educate yourself = Brainwash yourself with my opinions for me.

FYI This is Pan.

At the very least, pansexuals are goat-fuckers. If you are not a would-be goat-fucker, don’t call yourself a pansexual, dipshits. Otherwise, when you use that term thinking you’re cool on tumblr, you’ll find yourself swiftly unemployed as the creepy guy. It is creepy. Creepy is the new edgy. If you get a face tattoo or stupid hair, you’ll be fired for that too. Welcome to social consequences for social ineptitude, brought to you by maths.

*Anyone who disputes that very common story, ask yourself ‘Where was the father?’ At literally any point beforehand.

Link: ‘Sexual Orientation’ and ‘Gender Identity’ are meaningless

All this coming up. They’re still banging on the pedophilia drum.


Not opinion, but a fact. There is no agreed-upon definition in academia.

This gets into arbitrary vagueness, it could literally be like 50 shades of grey. There could be 50 different terms for 5 things, each slightly different along a scale. The scale could be contracted or expanded, from 5 to 5 million terms, and people would still identify themselves along the Likert scale because that is how humans respond to scales in self-report. They fall prey to experimenter’s biases. Kinsey used it to justify his own fetishes. Including the mere use of Likert instead of checkboxes, intended to give firm results. How special do you feel? Do you identify as a snowflake?

In the most logical, hardest scientific terms, here would be the genuine definitions that would work in law (nothing less would work);

Sex (noun): chromosomal. Male, XY. Female, XX. Various genetic disorders would thus be accounted for under Both (still within the binary of a dimorphic species).

Gender: firstly, nothing to do with identity. Masculine, Feminine, Androgyne (both). According to Jung, everyone has both, which makes the last category meaningless, so everyone would fit into masculine or feminine based on their 51%+ score on something like…. The Bem Gender Inventory? Purely psychological, fluid and prone to change.

(Sexual) Identity: behaviour and its choice (see? nothing to do with gender and arguably, sex).

Sexual Orientation: which sex do you identify in sexual terms (physical attraction toward)? Male (sex as a noun), female (sex as a noun) or both (bisexual). If neither, you don’t have one, so it isn’t a valid question to answer, a simple N/A or blank would suffice. Note: non-physical attractions are invalid as all normal humans feel those (agape) and this is a polite descriptor of lust.

This last rules out invalid claims to orientation (based on age, a changing factor, species or other non-humans, or state of life, for example). Paraphilias (fetishes) are likewise discounted, as non-personal attractants by definition.

Social conditioning (inc. pornography) CAN change sexual orientation/identity, as most people know it:

This does not bode well for the future of Sex Ed at increasingly younger ages pushing abnormative sexualities. Maybe Putin knew something we didn’t? At the very least, porn should be credit-card subscriber-based only, cut off completely from children, the entire video model is truly as addictive as alcohol or drugs (maybe 21 in places);


99% of these people were adults and had had time to form a proper sexuality and relationships prior to their issues. This meant, that as one neuroscientist suggested, with the right help their brains could be returned to their previous sexual identity, even if the images they had viewed cannot be completely forgotten.

For a boy aged 10-14, with no previous sexual experience, there is no reset button. [DS: this is because the brain kills off or ‘prunes’ the disused connections] We could have future generations of young men who objectify women and have totally unrealistic ideas of sex and in some cases men who will have their brains re-wired by extreme imagery to the extent that they could be a risk to the women and children around them. We shouldn’t put our heads in the sand and await for some true scientific evidence. We need to do something now.

Who does that sound like?

Is this a better test (than erections) for sexual orientation?…………

It is a dangerous practice and any parent who encourages their child to indulge (separate from the debatable issue of masturbation), is frankly guilty of child abuse (as all future centuries will see it, like we see cocaine in Coca Cola for Victorian children now or other hard drugs in ‘cough medicines’): http://yourbrainonporn.com/why-shouldnt-johnny-watch-porn-if-he-likes

There’s a kicker though. The capacity of our teen to wire up new sexual associations mushrooms around 11 or 12 when billions of new neural connections (synapses) create endless possibilities. However, by adulthood his brain must prune his neural circuitry to leave him with a manageable assortment of choices. By his twenties, he may not exactly be stuck with the sexual proclivities he falls into during adolescence, but they can be like deep ruts in his brain—not easy to ignore or reconfigure.

Sexual-cue exposure matters more during adolescence than at any other time in life. Now, add to this incendiary reality the lighter fluid of today’s off-the-wall erotica available at the tap of a finger. Is it any surprise that some teens wire semi-permanently to constant cyber novelty instead of potential mates? Or wire their sexual responsiveness to things that are unrelated to their sexual orientation? Or manage to desensitize their brains—and spiral into porn addiction?


Loneliness can make a person more addiction-prone (as a self-soothing or self-medicating behaviour?)

In short, the same reward circuitry in their brains that makes them want to fall head over heels also leaves them especially vulnerable to addiction. In contrast, most rodents don’t like alcohol. They have to be bred specially to use it. But both prairie voles and humans will drink, suggesting that similarities in their reward circuitry make possible a strong buzz.

…Bottom line: Drugs can hijack the bonding mechanism, and register as a sort of love-substitute.

I’ve never known a lonely man who didn’t have a self-soothing behavior to try and compensate (a lot of alcoholics, some porn addictions, a few other drugs, a LOT video games as a secondary ‘hobby’ – when it’s a time sink like TV) and periods that reminded them of their loneliness acted as weakness triggers to engage.

…It’s almost as if the reward circuitry of a pair bonder has a “little hole” crying out to be filled by a pair bond (even if the individual never bonds). In the absence of a mate, a pair bonder will look around for something else to fill that “hole.” Obviously, we humans often try to fill the “hole” with lots of friends, serial affairs, porn, drugs, alcohol, devotion to a guru or a cause, or whatever—all of which furnish, or at least promise, some neurochemical satisfaction.

The important point is that the brain mechanism that primes a pair bonder to bond is mechanical, not rational.

So no, they aren’t ever choosing to do these things. That is not a plausible answer. Addiction muddles the concept of motivation.

…Note: Pair bonding is not a moral strategy; it is a mating strategy, and arises from a subconscious brain mechanism. The vole example demonstrates that bonding is not a cultural phenomenon…..

Please read The Mating Mind for details.

According to biologist David Barash, normal pair bonder “sexual behavior is neither especially frequent nor especially fervent.”

Manosphere is wrong on marriage again….. (priorities change when children arrive).

The fact that pair bonders stay bonded without constant sexual fireworks suggests that the bond itself is normally rewarding.

K-types ahoy.

All of this means that much of today’s sex advice won’t work well for lovers who want to remain paired.

Including the manosphere (short-termism), while encouraging married men to cheat and bemoaning high divorce rates.

As far as male N sexual partners, more monogamous men (lower count) are happier:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/cupids-poisoned-arrow/201107/guys-where-do-you-fall-the-monogamy-spectrum because the novelty factor isn’t guiding/controlling them (impossible perfectionism, hedonic treadmill, they can literally never stop because boredom becomes akin to death).

But hey, they don’t want to be told that because they’ve already screwed up and out of spite they want other men to screw up too, much like slutty feminists who encourage good girls to go bad…. (In sum: the r-types deserve one another).

As the previous link makes clear, in behavioral context, it makes them less human (more like a hollowed-up sociopath they admire);

Such effects impact relationships. Constant novelty is one of the prime reasons Internet porn is a superstimulus for the brain. Erotic training that relies on novelty as aphrodisiac can condition users such that familiar partners quickly lose their luster—confining users affected to shallow hook-ups. Also, the non-climax aspects of sex (skin-to-skin contact, kissing, comforting stroking, playful behavior, etc.) may be too unfamiliar and subtle to register as deliciously rewarding. Unfortunately, these are the very behaviors that soothe the brain and help couples strengthen their bonds.

If you have any doubts as to the damage of these early influences, look up “psychological imprinting porn”

Anti-gamergate SJWs are pro-paedophile

Well, they’ve already got the foot in the door from homosexuality. Most paedos are same-sex.

They’ve had it re-labelled an orientation and the MSM hasn’t covered it.
This is their endgame, a Brave New World where evil adults, there is no other word for it, but evil, will ruin the lives of innocent children for pleasure.

h/t Vox Day.
Lso: http://thelibertyzone.com/2015/09/02/smells-like-pedo-bear/