Comic: Sympathy for the Devil

The rapists expecting praise for mature self-control are so current year.

Like the gay guy who ‘resists’ groping a straight man.

Predators are often the same people committing different crimes, thereby artificially inflating perceived criminals in society. Generally, they murder men and rape women (but sometimes also murder) so dealing with one camp’s issue is also beneficial to the other e.g. society would be greatly boosted by the death penalty for the antisocial, guiltless misfits.

Male entitlement crushed by ancient Jews

-puts paid to the notion that Weinsteins would be enabled, although it might’ve only applied to Jewish women (who Weinstein still targeted).

3254 words. In a conservative society, saying any of this would be unnecessary.

https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.75a?lang=bi

Apropos the discussion of the obligation to allow oneself to be killed rather than engage in forbidden sexual intercourse, the Gemara notes that Rav Yehuda says that Rav says: There was an incident involving a certain man who set his eyes upon a certain woman and passion rose in his heart, to the point that he became deathly ill. And they came and asked doctors what was to be done with him. And the doctors said: He will have no cure until she engages in sexual intercourse with him. The Sages said: Let him die, and she may not engage in sexual intercourse with him. The doctors said: She should at least stand naked before him. The Sages said: Let him die, and she may not stand naked before him. The doctors suggested: The woman should at least converse with him behind a fence in a secluded area, so that he should derive a small amount of pleasure from the encounter. The Sages insisted: Let him die, and she may not converse with him behind a fence.

Voyeurism/cuck culture from Jewish (or Fake Jew, YMMV) pornography has addled the brains of many men. Blame the enemy, not your tribal women.

No rape or fornicating. Better God strike you down for your lust.

Now that’s the God I recognise from the Old Testament and Jesus’ orders to look away.

It is also evil for men (doctors) to enable or encourage sin, which checks out. A lot of ‘therapists’ encourage self-destruction, body and soul, to this day. It is likewise, wrong.

Modern men should be ashamed if they lack basic impulse control, ancient men saw women literally walking round with their tits out (Greece, other places) and were man enough not to rape anyone. Clearly, you can’t blame clothes. While God made tits for babies, that doesn’t include crybabies. Like, lesbians don’t want to rape women in the gym shower? Man up.

Or is the muh dick “sexual emergency” sodomy of that Muslim in a white country to a little boy suddenly righteous?

Moving the goalposts won’t work. It’ll just enable gays and pedos to rape you…. a ….slippery slope… indeed….

Entitlement is physical, whether it’s Communists wanting your coin or rapists wanting your, ahem, ‘dignity’. It’s rank materialism and thus rejects all claims or ties to spirituality as a matter of course.

When you think about it, from fat acceptance SJWs to so-called incels, who both wish to impose, they’re all Sexual Communists. It’s Brave New World bullshit. Nobody else cares about what you want, snowflake.

Strangers owe you NOTHING. It’s like Commies who feel entitled to a job from the ‘evil capitalist scum’.

You hate them, no?!

Slavery is illegal, all the actions of it too, like rape or stealing labour. Human rights aren’t going anywhere without you all being drafted to die gored on barbed wire for Israel’s profit margins in the barbed wire sector.

This sexual begging will astonish historians. Especially when they have porn, specialist toys and hands. Their T-levels are pushed even higher with masturbation, why it was called self-abuse. A sexbot would reject them, and probably kill them – Terminator prequel?

Ask them how many gay guys would feel entitled to their hole if ‘everybody belonged to everybody else’, they might get the point. Women have minds and feelings too, like people! God’s people! If women can’t say no to the Darwinian unfit, neither can you because out there, somewhere, is a man who wants to sodomize you – I guarantee it. The standard of most homo men is “they possess an anus” based on the count statistics (100s-1000s, if allowed) so they might get a nasty surprise if any of this actually happened, legally. Actually, is this how Sodom started? Pretty sure.

This type of entitled male complains about prison rape (I’m a victim but not directly attitude) but hey, aren’t they saying it’s okay and even moral if a man feels lust? They’re directly justifying prison rape.

Since you don’t need to consent if a man wants to injure your body, right?

“I want” is a train of thought even a toddler should be shamed for. When your brain develops beyond this, they’re just taking the piss falling back on it. Either get over it (simply by looking away, as Jesus wisely prescribed) OR they’re so brain damaged (poor impulse control is a dominant sign of low IQ) that they belong in an asylum where the wicked existence of the world won’t ‘tempt’ them to be predators (monasteries are also an option, although probably just a more open model of asylum on the same grounds).

Entitlement is a sick combination of practically every sin, especially pride, envy, greed and obviously lust. Anyone trying to justify it as moral is at best a moral relativist and at worst a rapist looking for social approval.

Sex is not a human need. It never has been (especially for women but I digress). You do not need it. You do not need it to live, either. That is a pleasure rhetoric myth from the 60s Free Love hippy bullshit. “Love is all you need” – okay, stop beating your Asian wife first, John. Same guy: “Imagine all the people, living life in peace…” – apply it to your own house first, you abusive prick.

It’s a sign of the backward atheist times that even guys deriding Muslim rape gangs in one breath will use the next to justify their own aspirations to rape a woman for ‘tempting’ them.* This isn’t India or Pakistan, it’s the First World. We don’t negotiate with sexual terrorists, we shoot them. Women looked better in the 50s (1750s, 1850s, and 1950s) and men weren’t catcalling, harassing, stalking and raping them as punishment for being feminine (which have no doubt, is exactly what it is). They can just go live in places that do punish women for femininity (move to Saudi Arabia) but it won’t make them happy either. You’re not entitled to attention from anyone, which is really what the AA for men guys actually want: to jump up the masculine hierarchy without earning respect.

Woman: <is feminine>

Rapists: it’s free real estate.

“Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife” or daughter or sister or aunt…… etc.

[*Actually, how many fakecels are non-white? Where’s that survey? If most of them are browns who feel entitled to white wimminz, because they moved West, that might explain a lot.]

Applying ghetto culture to white societies has and will be the death of us. Catcalling was just the start. White men should be shamed for acting black like that, it’s so immature, like a dog chasing a car. White people use indoor voices, we don’t ‘holler’. Incels don’t dare turn on rap for brainwashing and insulting white people, a notable omission.

The expansion of the discussion of this story is interesting.

The Gemara comments: Rabbi Ya’akov bar Idi and Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani disagree about this issue. One of them says: The woman in question was a married woman, and the other one says: She was unmarried.The Gemara tries to clarify the issue: Granted, according to the one who saysthat she was a married woman, the matter is properly understood. Since the case involved a severely prohibited forbidden relationship, the Sages did not allow any activity hinting at intimacy. But according to the one who says that she was unmarried, what is the reason for all this opposition? Why did the Sages say that the man must be allowed to die, rather than have the woman do as was requested?

Women aren’t whores unless forced by slavery, simple. God made women with dignity, not as sex toys.

The creeps tend to have three motives – physical obviously, social in bragging about their ‘conquests’ (pathetic) and stealing intimacy, forcing a loss of dignity (that humiliating is pathological, specifically psychopathic).

Naturally, the pathological always claim to be normal and even good, evil lies.

Rav Pappa says: This is due to the potential family flaw, i.e., harm to the family name, as it is not permitted to bring disgrace to the entire family in order to save the lovesick man. Rav Aḥa, son of Rav Ika, says: This is so that the daughters of Israel should not be promiscuous with regard to forbidden sexual relations. Were they to listen to the doctors’ recommendations, Jewish women might lose moral restraint.

Proof narcissists have always existed and saner cultures stamped them down like the cockroaches they are. Rapists (inc. would-be rapists) will literally try to hold society to ransom like we should give a damn about their ‘problems’. Sexually perverse extortion. We don’t negotiate with sexual terrorists, again. White people are simply too civilized and high IQ to consider our own people property, our women aren’t poker chips – not to Western creeps or Middle Eastern ones.

Yes, it is degrading, to the family and the woman, who is also a member of said family.

Ordering round women you aren’t related to is… sad, to say the least. Controlling men are always ironically weak in character, it’s reaction formation.

Nobody should follow the weak, neither women nor men. Appeasement of the freaks is r-selected.

These efforts to corrupt women, in this story or the various incel “I deserve/women should…” posts are depraved.

Spot the r-type:

The Gemara asks: But if the woman was unmarried, let the man marry her.The Gemara answers:His mind would not have been eased by marriage, in accordance with the statement of Rabbi Yitzḥak. As Rabbi Yitzḥak says: Since the day the Temple was destroyed, sexual pleasure was taken away from those who engage in permitted intercourse and given to transgressors, as it is stated: “Stolen waters are sweet, and bread eaten in secret is pleasant”(Proverbs 9:17). Therefore, the man could have been cured only by engaging in illicit sexual interaction.

Scorn degeneracy or it defiles society, one example at a time. A rotten apple spoils the barrel.

“let him marry her” implies she or her family wants to let her remain with the lech (Jews, being civilized, didn’t have forced marriage, the woman chose)

Logically, if it was illicit 1. he’s wronging society, 2. he should be punished (stoning should do it) and 3. then it shouldn’t matter what other men or women (inc her father) think, since it wouldn’t be illicit if they approved any intimacy.

You’re not entitled to anything from strangers, anything, from men or women.

This shouldn’t need be explained to adults.

Being logically sound, they also enforced death penalty as a punishment equally for male or female sinners, it was purely based on the crime.

The prohibition and punishment apply both in cases

You can’t run a society on 50% degeneracy.

If men are the moral authority, their immorality is more evil, since their standard is higher by choice.

Even if all women shut their legs tomorrow, men would still sin and probably just with each other (like the Navy).

Take responsibility for your own feels, weaklings.

The baraita continues: Lewdness is stated here, with regard to the punishment: “There shall be no lewdness among you” (Leviticus 20:14), and lewdness is stated there, with regard to the prohibition: “You shall not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter; you shall not take her son’s daughter, or her daughter’s daughter, to uncover her nakedness; they are near kinswomen, it is lewdness” (Leviticus 18:17). It is derived by means of a verbal analogy that just as there the prohibition applies to the woman’s daughter, and the daughter of her daughter, and the daughter of her son, so too here, the punishment of burning applies to one who engages in intercourse with the woman’s daughter, and to the daughter of her daughter, and to the daughter of her son.

See the tie-in to Christian society, this is germane.

So that Jewish story explains Leviticus.

Also, playing Man Card to rape relatives is obviously evil, no “But muh Patriarchy” isn’t get out of Hell free.

Execution by burning is more severe than execution by stoning

That explains Jesus telling the lustful how they’ll burn.

Interestingly, they killed sinners prior to rape (i.e. damaging the woman).

The baraita taught that the word “sin” is referring to women who are forbidden to a man by a prohibition the violation of which renders him liable to receive karet. From here it is derived that a man who attempts to rape a woman who is forbidden to him under penalty of karet may be killed.

And Rabbi Yehuda maintains that the Merciful One says that a rapist must be killed because his victim is prepared to sacrifice her life rather than yield to rape.

Well, yeah. Rape is worse than murder to women. Men would feel the same if they had the same anatomy and/or could get pregnant. The film Alien was a horror film about one man’s fear of rape and being pregnant, true story.

Let the rapist be, she is saying this so that he should not kill her, and therefore the rapist is not killed.

Let the rape victim decide if the rapist is killed, sounds totally fair. He took away her right over her body, it’s kosher she should get a right over his. There is also the common connection between rapists also murdering their victims, so this acknowledges that in a poetic way.

The same laws Christianity is based on also allow self defense to save a life including prevent crime (such as rape).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pikuach_nefesh

So killing a rapist as they attempt it is kosher too, but also mentioned in the Bible as crying out (for the mob to kill him).

The ‘doctors’ were appealing to that valid breach of the law (where it was invalid) to prevent death but an entitled degenerate isn’t going to die from lack of sex or all monks would’ve keeled over in six months. The incels who kvetch “but I’ll die without an Asian GF” should just off themselves if they really believed that. I wonder how many are borderlines, because threatening suicide (even to strangers) to manipulate people is textbook borderline personality (and this apparently happened in ancient times).

“But I’ll die because muh Dick”

“Okay, die.” – society.

Naturally, their bluff is false because they come back to it over literally years.

Aren’t you dead yet? Weren’t you supposed to be dead in like, the 90s? Promise?

The First World should mock Muh Dicks the way it did historically when it was proud and coincidentally successful. Victim culture bleeding into sex/rape is predictable but evil. Rapists in prison claiming they dindu nuffin started it. No, men needn’t lay SJW fatties. No, white women needn’t lay smelly Muslims. No no no no no.

Muh Dicks – putting the mental in victim mentality.

The fact many claim to be libertarian (your rights end….!) is uniquely hilarious.

Your agency is crap and you should feel bad. A lot of people don’t get laid, including religious types, they don’t obsess over it or threaten to hurt anyone. And aren’t libertarians claiming any degeneracy as a social good if there’s consent? So their one true evil would be anyone who violates consent…. like SJW fatties or the bitter rapey majority of ‘incels’.

When both Jesus and his sage forebears from his ancestral religion say the same thing: you are responsible for being tempted, not the thing you ogle, then it’s pretty clear what’s what.

Ogling is a sin.

I say thing because art, billboards etc. They even do this to things, hence object in objectification. We call them wankers for a reason.

“allow” the pitiful excuse for a man to die

God wants the weak to perish, he goes on and on about it and how the way is narrow et al. He sends tests all the time.

rather than have the woman do as was requested?Implies she wanted nothing to do with the creep, even as his wife. So basically you had a predator with a personality disorder (but I repeat myself) trying to force a random woman into letting him (by the power of the law!) rape her instead of killing him, as was her legal right to self defense.

I could ‘request’ a lot of things from men, it doesn’t make me entitled to them.
Other people are not wish genies.

Bloody losers. I bet he’d malinger to dodge the draft, too. Coercion is immoral, a sign of low character.

Having freedom of choice is THE freedom of white, First World societies. THE liberty our ancestors died for.

Both employers, the military (and women) can tell you, NO, you’re unsuitable for this role.

And you have to accept that, rejection is a fact of life. Women get rejected all the time, including in CV studies. We also get rejected at the HR level for being too attractive according to the SJW hags residing therein, so this alleged advantage is pure fiction.

We can reject and be rejected. You can’t nag the system of evolution into changing – the bird that picks up no stone has no mate.

This can include if there are no other applicants. There is no obligation to just accept anyone. Plenty of women are single rather than settle for a whiny entitled soyboy who’d dodge the draft. I wonder if the incel subs (which is not all celibate people obviously* as they claim, anymore than LGB bullshit represents most gays) have polled their attributes. e.g. How many so-called incels choose to be fat? Choose not to shower? Choose not to work?

Can those choices really be called the fault of women? They have no qualms blaming fat SJWs for their own weight, even in true medical cases where it’s morally grotesque e.g. permanent Pill damage, thyroid issue, genetic disorder.

*On the contrary, most celibates I’ve met were really happy about it. No drama, no stress, no disease, plenty of time for sublimation into hobbies or work or the family they already have. Maybe the innocuous (minority of internet) incels are just sick of virgin shaming, which is a very real and precise issue (very small but brutal and wrong) to do with sexualisation and objectification of people based on their sex life (and what Hollywood tries to force us to think it “should” be). However, they contribute to that culture by assuming that women are sleeping around without them (and verbally abusing them for the imaginary slight) when statistically their peers are having less sex than their parents and you know most of that’s the minority of thots skewing the already low data a bit higher. If society praised the virtues of the innocuous ones, their chastity, would they be miserable? Doubtful. I put it to you those are not ‘incels’ because they’re not misogynists or rapists or anything like that, they’re not trying to control others either, they’re just sick of Hollywood’s culty pressure to dictate what they do with their dick. That is 100% justified.

The Sages raised a dilemma before Rabbi Ami: Is a descendant of Noah,who is commanded to refrain from idol worship, also commanded about the sanctification of God’s name, or is he not commanded about the sanctification of God’s name?

It’s interesting to read their little tizzies to understand later metaphors and tie-ins to Christianity later.

Funny to note: no report of the wannabe rapist actually dying. Borderlines bluff.

Tranny sex offender tried sneaking into school

Repeat Sexual Offender Arrested After Dressing Like Woman to Sneak Into School: Geoffrey Kelley

Ballygawley, County Tyrone, UK – A man convicted of three previous sexual offenses has been arrested after he was accused of donning a wig and women’s clothing to enter a local school.

Police accuse Geoffrey Rainey Kelly, aged 35, of putting on a white skirt, pink jacket, pearl necklace and blonde wig, and gaining entry to St Ciaran’s College through a side door.

Not premeditated at all.

School staff say they caught Mr Kelley wandering the halls and attempting to turn the handle on various doors.

When confronted by staff, the man claimed to be searching for a particular third-year female pupil, and gave staff the name. Staff could not find a child listed with the name on the school register, and questioned him further.

Lying.

And what if they had such a kid? Let that thing in a room with them?

Mr Kelly then stated that he was “just looking around.”

It would make sense if most misogynists (sexual predator kind) just pretended to be trannies to attack women in gym showers. It would make sense.

He left the school and drove away in a vehicle, and was later arrested by police at Ballygawley Park and Ride, still wearing the clothing described by St Ciaran’s staff.

Declaring Mr Kelley at high risk of re-offending and noncompliance with bail conditions, Judge Mark McGarrity denied him bail, noting that he had violated a Sexual Offences Prevention Order that bans him from coming within 20 meters of schools and other places frequented by minors under age 18.

like only minors should be protected?

Mr Kelly has prior convictions for sexual assaulting female individuals in 2016 and 2017, and a 2017 conviction for entering a clothing store and emerging from the changing room fully naked in front of a 16-year-old girl who was employed there.

Rehabilitation is impossible when they enjoy offending, literally.

The cure for pedophilia is lead.

also here

Sex offender caught wandering school dressed as woman

Also, library drag freak a convicted pedophile.

“Drag Queen Storytime” Reader at Houston Library a Convicted Paedophile: Albert Garza

Pedos don’t dress up like the big bad wolf anymore, but a hooker.

Well done America

New law will force child sex abusers to pay for their own castration before being released from jail

Needs to be surgical, however, and all rapists, considering criminal versatility this would reduce overall crime.

No half-measures.

A new law will force pedophiles whose victims were under 13 to pay for their own castration before they’re released from jail. The HB 379 bill was signed by Alabama Governor Kay Ivey Wednesday after being introduced by Republican State Representative Steve Hurst. It will see child molesters undergo chemical castration, with drugs used to suppress their sexual urges. Anyone who refuses to do so will be considered in violation of their parole and kept in prison.

They want to let the pedos out, this is an excuse.

And lower age of consent to 13.

Obviously.

Explaining the reasoning behind the controversial proposal, Hurst told CBS42: ‘They have marked this child for life and the punishment should fit the crime. ‘I had people call me in the past when I introduced it and said don’t you think this is inhumane?

Forcing rape victims to carry to term is inhumane. The trauma of any rape victim is inhumane.

It’s discrimination based on age, this cannot be lawful.

The rapist clearly cannot be trusted to use their organ in a legal manner.

If there’s a way to do it surgically to female pedos, them too.

Everyone on the rapist’s side should be on some kinda list.

‘I asked them what’s more inhumane than when you take a little infant child, and you sexually molest that infant child when the child cannot defend themselves or get away, and they have to go through all the things they have to go through. ‘If you want to talk about inhumane – that’s inhumane.’

God didn’t say one rape was okay.

Half measures are evil.

Day before 13? Evil. Day after? Go ahead. WTF.

Rape victims in general cannot defend themselves, they tend to freeze, it’s been studied.

A total just world fallacy requiring telepathy, precognition and super strength.

Let’s leave him drunk in a bath-house and see if he can ‘get away’.

Sometimes people narrowly avoid it but they’re still traumatized and the predator is still a danger.

Hurst has also claimed that his bill could deter pedophiles from targeting children, and reduce the number of child sex offenses taking place.

Yeah make them target adult women and make rape babies.

What trauma?

A woman only deserves legal protection and sympathy prior to age 13, right?

Also, if they can control who they target, it’s fully intentional, premeditated predation and the cure is a rope.

But Alabama attorney Raymond Johnson is among those who oppose it. He thinks existing punishments are sufficient. Johnson explained: ‘They’re going to challenge it under the 8th Amendment Constitution. ‘They’re going to claim that it is cruel and unusual punishment  for someone who has served their time and for the rest of there life have to be castrated.’

These people are subhuman and cannot be rehabilitated.

God never said such people could be pure, the sentence was death.

Sexual sadists are not fully human, the neuroscience is clear.

Man ‘found with 21 severed vaginas’ in his freezer appears in court

Castrate them – before they do it to you.

Sexual predators pretty much general criminals too

Why the death penalty is a good idea, clinical side:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12616928

Trait empathy and criminal versatility in sexual offenders.

Associations between trait empathy and criminal versatility were examined in a sample of 88 incarcerated adult sexual offenders (29 extrafamilial child molesters, 26 intrafamilial child molesters, and 33 rapists). Considerable criminal versatility was observed, with 60% of the whole sample and 88% of recidivist offenders having previous convictions for nonsexual offenses. Regression analyses showed significant associations between trait empathy and nonsexual offense convictions, but not between trait empathy and sexual offense convictions. More specifically, greater involvement in violent offending (e.g., assault, robbery) was associated with lower levels of empathic concern and higher levels of fantasy. Greater involvement in miscellaneous (e.g., traffic, drug, public order) offending was associated with lower levels of empathic concern. We argue that insufficient theoretical and empirical attention has historically been given to criminal versatility among sexual offenders, especially among child molesters. In particular, we suggest that developments in empathy training for sexual offenders may benefit from distinguishing needs of criminally versatile and non-versatile sexual offenders. More knowledge about trait empathy in sexual offenders, and about situational factors that may override otherwise normal empathic responsiveness, is needed.

Nice to know misogynists are related to pedophiles.

If you don’t ‘think’ a rapist is sexist, I dunno what to tell ya.

You’re probably a misogynist?

It’s odd because most pedophiles are male on male, typically, so two sides of the same coin?

So pedophiles are just misandrists who find it easier to target physically weaker boys? Is that their tactic? While misogynists go more for adult women, being weaker but easier to plausibly deny as ‘consenting’.

Previously, rapists would claim not to know the victim… until DNA.

If empathy must be trained, which it cannot be (brain development, neural pruning) maybe those “incapable” of not attacking people should be put down like dogs, that keep attacking people. You don’t “lose” your temper, you choose to attack someone. Rape isn’t an accident, you hypoagency-pushing liars. If they’re a danger to society and for some obscure, rare, brain damaged reason cannot actually control themselves, they should be locked up in asylums. 

Impulse control is a choice.

Over-ride seems to imply all men as rapists just waiting for an opportunity. BULLSHIT.

My hunger can overwhelm my urge not to steal a croissant… wait, I don’t do that, because that’s crazy. You don’t get to blame the world for your personal weakness.

Muh Dick is invalid.

r-types expose themselves

“It’s you, not me!”

spot the r-type is a fun game

slippery slope is not a fallacy, it’s pushing tolerance for evil

first it’s about letting your son be a manwhore, spreading STDs like a gay guy, causing various aborted pregnancies and without consequence, shun marriage

next thing you know he’s dressed in drag and eyeing the family dog

lefties wanna hook ’em young because if everyone’s doing it, they imagine they can avoid consequences forever

muh sexual expression has no limits, zero limits, there isn’t a level of depravity they won’t hit eventually for novelty thrills

When the Midwest receives demands from Dem voters for food, remember this.

“we explained” excuses don’t make a thing less evil

Never look at their behaviour and hold them accountable. Nope.

Don’t look at the Biblical list of crimes and wonder whether they’re there for a reason.

 

Importing misogyny

Anti-white misogyny only.

They just can’t admit it openly.

I no longer trust “right-wing” news reporters, especially alternatives, because they completely missed out this viral video as the true reason France simply began to enforce its harassment law.

Fine, you lie and omit like the left, I won’t trust you like the left.

It doesn’t even have to be sexual harassment, people have a right to walk down the street in peace. It isn’t a strip club and both parties know the attention is an insult. Nobody has a right to take up your time or get your response. We’ve all been eased into this with comedians being cunts and calling it ‘a prank’ or with charity people on the street, in the UK they can’t legally come up to you anymore actually, begging is illegal. As harassment. They can’t even shake those donation tins, it’s coercion. Nothing to do with sex, just basic respect.

These little cowards wouldn’t dare be aggressive in public to men, they pick on the weaker sex like an animal. Notice he chose a lone, thin woman, who clearly couldn’t physically defend herself.

Why don’t most women risk dressing up anymore? Femininity is punished.

The First World must enforce its standards of decency and oppose this American lechery.

Hollywood’s been teaching these people lies.

White people don’t exist to please you. 

White men won’t pay you, white women won’t flirt with you. We don’t want you here, nobody asked you to come here.

Sex Bias in the US Code 1977

Snopes link a suspicious dead end.

https://www2.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/usccr/documents/cr12se9.pdf

But the Left loves women, it just wants them to have no legal recourse to the “she consented” lie of rapists (before DNA it was ‘I never touched her’). Because all women are presumed hookers and have no right to refuse, according to the likes of Ginsburg. Libel of a whole sex.

(This also applies to men and children).

If you want to track when the 50s high trust society died, this document


There is no libertarian argument for prostitution because if you can buy a person (as long as you call yourself a ‘customer’ – renting, or ‘pimp’ – owner/master), the Government already owns you and can therefore order you to do things as your pimp. Anything. The trauma, drug addiction and suicide outcomes of prostitutes prove it is to be discouraged severely on a medical level. 

This claims to be all about “opportunity” (p.102 on the doc, p.109 digital) but the purpose of the law is protection against predators.
If it doesn’t do that, it’s invalid rule.

Monsters wanting to remove the shackles of legal consequences from other monsters.

The law doesn’t give you rights, merely enforces them, we have natural rights.

To claim otherwise is to dub women or whoever else less than human. Only non-human animals can be owned (or rented), so arguments for prostitution (rich people rape) are actually anti-Darwin.

Men who think to defend this don’t realize, rape of men happens all the time. Even prisoners of war are usually forced to watch the rape of others before it’s their turn. Most rapists make absolutely no distinction between male and female, young or very old, you must assume you are next in these acts of precedent. Because you are.

Serial rapists happily rape the disabled, elderly, babies… dogs….

you think they’ll care you have a dick?

inb4 “there’s nothing wrong with it”

Plus, if you had a son, would you like your son to be a prostitute?

early p.98 is funny because it’s such a strawman

  • spending money isn’t illegal
  • spending stolen money is – because it’s stolen
  • sex isn’t illegal
  • buying/renting a human is illegal, whatever the purpose*

Don’t play dumb, scum.

According to B, as an owned human in a “prostitution” ring, they’re already kidnapped. Anything that happens to them …is already illegal.

Sex isn’t illegal. Raping a (sex*) slave is illegal.

Paying their owner isn’t less illegal.

And furthermore, it’s a market exchange – using public currency.

Totally the Government’s (and Tax Man’s) purview.