Chastity has long been known, the physical temperance.
Sex (as such, in isolation from married love) leads merely to the desire for more sex. Sex is – like many intense pleasures, such as heroin – addictive. Furthermore, also like heroin, sex induces tolerance, requiring escalation of dose. In those in whom frequency has reached a maximum, there develops a decadent need to push boundaries and transgress – in order to maintain the desire and the response.
Sex isn’t like eating, it isn’t a right (entitlement is pride) or necessary and it isn’t an empty or meaningless pleasure.
It literally changes your brain.
Lust is trained to increase only by repetition, it’s insane to claim otherwise. It’s impossible to sate. Our hypersexualised culture, which puts it on billboards before tots, is inducing more to get you in more fiscal and moral debt. How to self-soothe? More porn! Porn teaches you to be voyeur, to seek out deviant materials with no end (hurtcore) and saps the very energy you’d need to fix your life. It’s the hobby of wastrels.
Without porn, without that legal prostitution, men and women would actually love each other! Instead, they’re trained to view the other and themselves as an assembly of body parts and ranked according to the number of things their grandmothers would be ashamed of trying.
Even men are now pressured to ‘try’ everything in baby steps, or you’re a loser/bigot. It started with blowjobs (inferior to full sex and previously almost unheard of), then suspiciously Peter Pan-like women giving them, then threesomes, then anal, and now ‘going gay’. What? Are men too stupid to see where this is going? It is quite obvious by now, they want to lead you away from anything healthy and nuclear family. If everyone’s a deviant, nobody is!
Atheism (cultural) and nihilism (angsty teen reduced version) are the minimum working hypotheses of Huxley for lazy people. You don’t need to try and be good if there is no good.
Scientifically, credit goes to Freud for libidinal energy, the life force.
And Jung for sublimation, what we’d call genius productivity.
There are, he held, an indefinitely large number of such instincts, but these can be reduced to a small number of basic ones, which he grouped into two broad generic categories, Eros (the life instinct), which covers all the self-preserving and erotic instincts, and Thanatos (the death instinct), which covers all the instincts towards aggression, self-destruction, and cruelty.
Thus it is a mistake to interpret Freud as asserting that all human actions spring from motivations which are sexual in their origin, since those which derive from Thanatos are not sexually motivated–indeed, Thanatos is the irrational urge to destroy the source of all sexual energy in the annihilation of the self. Having said that, it is undeniably true that Freud gave sexual drives an importance and centrality in human life, human actions, and human behavior which was new (and to many, shocking), arguing as he does that sexual drives exist and can be discerned in children from birth (the theory of infantile sexuality), and that sexual energy (libido) is the single most important motivating force in adult life. However, a crucial qualification has to be added here—Freud effectively redefined the term “sexuality” to make it cover any form of pleasure which is or can be derived from the body. Thus his theory of the instincts or drives is essentially that the human being is energized or driven from birth by the desire to acquire and enhance bodily pleasure.
It builds societies. The childless don’t care.
Many geniuses, where not celibate or married (chaste), were ruined or driven mad e.g. Hemingway, Byron, Edison, largely due to a certain out-of-control fault in their personality.
Sexuality is the most destructive force known to man. It reduces empires to ash.
Slaves weren’t usually brought in for labour but rape. Men always ruined themselves.
Stories of decadence and moral decay are always led by men, by the phallus e.g. pederasty.
Vice has become virtue, sex as exercise, it’s obscene.
Virtue is seen as Freudian repression, a twisted denial of the ‘goodness’ of pleasure.
Look up the raging pervert Kinsey for how that turns out. Degenerate is simply the original term for antisocial.
The whore is worshiped and any form of purity must be corrupted in the name of mature ‘experience’. Virginity is seen as a badge of shame, teenagers compete for racking up numbers an Old World prostitute would blush at.
The young are sold down the river by the lecherous old, who naturally want to predate on them. Yes, have it all, ignore all the statistics that fucking around young messes you up for life. Pair bonding, who needs that prison? Wow, why are young fuckboys so angry and desperate and lonely? They’re following their naturalistic fallacy wherever it points (women who do it are no better but follow men in the trends, if men had standards they’d adapt).
When Christians, including die-hard Catholics, make excuses for fornication, we’re all fucked.
If your politics does not extend to your sex life, you don’t really believe in it. Personal life used to define your principles e.g. I am a monk, therefore I am celibate. The hypocrisy of this age is sickening, to believe in nothing but claim superiority while debauching the same society you chide.
For example, why do family films show more than a kiss between adults?
Look at the commotion caused by The Kiss film. Scandal. When society was strong.
It’s weak, we are a West of weakness and made of weak people. They have weak impulse control and this ruins their life, as they deserve.
The alcohol advertisements have taken over where the tobacco ones left off.
The myth of Prohibition glamour made all ‘parties’ since more akin to orgies. Thanks, Mafia!
Replacing vice with vice and creating our own ills. We don’t deserve to be saved.
Show me a slut (either sex) who isn’t a wretch.
Oddly, you’ll never find a fulfilled, perfectly contented one.
Supposed bon vivant Casanova was miserable. Anyone’s happy that drunk.
“Sexy” is no longer rude, it’s meant to be a compliment!
It’s like the anal butthole problem (buttholes have never been sexy), since when is ‘I want to use you like a hooker’ a good thing?
School lied, it doesn’t make you popular, quite the opposite. Nobody wants a ‘friend’ they can’t trust around a spouse, another friend of the opposite/same sex or a sibling/parent. Adults used to have public conduct and standards of propriety. Men are little better than the women and in many instances worse (howling at people in the street). This is the First World? Our ancestors died for that?
Burn in Hell, scumbag.
The sheer volume of rumours I’ve heard about him and his Pleasure Island palace.
Apparently, his son was induced to try or saw things no child should.
The objective fact alone is bad enough.
He’d lend out women like you’d lend out tupperware. We now must live in the sexualised culture, including of teens, that he made. Oh, what an icon. And even if you don’t participate in the degeneracy, you’ll be held to this postmodern sexual revolution culture’s standards and objectification, where a woman dressed nicely (AKA as a woman, not androgynous or manly) is considered fair game to harass. Cunture, surely.
And they wonder why women en masse made less effort with their appearance in direct proportion to the objectification in media that any woman looking womanly = hooker, and can, nay, should be solicited!
Women used to dress like ladies, yes, when men weren’t allowed to shout at them in the street for it.
Maybe men can switch on the rational part of their brains and think that maybe, just maybe, this negative reinforcement, this demeaning punishment, has something to do with it?
The thought process goes as such
I could wear this nice dress, but it’s likelier I’ll be harassed, stalked and possibly attacked. Feminine clothing attracts sexual predators. Guess I’ll wear trousers again, on second thoughts.
[However, sexual signalling is not a thing, it does not exist academically or otherwise.]
I’ve seen men try to blame women whatever we were wearing. and use that nonsense term to intellectualize it. No, it’s because they have a vagina, can’t help that. Can’t help having secondary sexual characteristics either i.e. a figure. Any clothing will show that up.
Porn-addled lewdness has caused this so-called androgyny problem. It isn’t a problem, it’s self-protection in an era where men don’t punish their own; when we do risk it to try and express God-given femininity, ask female friends what happens. We even have special PC terms for what was formerly only a way ghetto people spoke to one another “the wrong sort of attention” – not from women, though, was it? Yet another great thing white people adopted from black culture. White men are, as the old saying goes, ‘acting black’, so white women dress like the men. Common sense.
Reduce crime and women will feel safe enough to look like women again.
That isn’t possible at all.
The Sexual Revolution was designed to reduce the pool of suitable wives.
And to a lesser extent, the suitable husbands (no cheating, no regret, can be satisfied sexually).
Virgin shaming, as it’s been dubbed, is the entire purpose.
This ‘defense’ against slut shaming is based on two lies 1. promiscuity is good for individuals and/or society and 2. sex is a sport, it is athletic and you must do it frequently and well then brag about it or you are missing out on the human experience or you’re less than human/adult. Those are both evil ways to think, if you look. Many of feminism’s problems would dry up if neither of those cruel mindsets applied to people.
It’s like introverts and extraverts, both groups will always exist.
They shine in different times but now society is larger, populations denser and we’re supposed to stay civilized.
When society favours one, things go wrong. Naturally, the sexual experiment has shown all those pesky religious types were right – adultery is up, children have more psychiatric issues than ever, various fetishes are normalized, deviants such as pedophiles are gaining acceptance in tolerance, and undeniably, there are now STDs which cannot be treated. This is a regression, society is devolving and going backwards.
Those with a natural sense of temperance and what’s been called sexual modesty, and it is natural and good to be modest (we evolved for small tribes after all) will naturally feel disgust to those.. lacking.
Those lacking it won’t understand it, and choose to project their feelings of confusion and shame onto those who feel an emotion they cannot, labeling it wrong and unnatural to soothe their conscience (it’s really prostitution the longer you think about the requirements, all intended to serve).
This is the one type of freedom that is bad for humans. Always has been. The neuro-pull is too strong.
It might be acceptable – if contraception didn’t exist.
However, sexuality is the most destructive force in society and contraception makes this more toxic.
Sex is neither a need nor a right. Never has been. It is a drive and desire.
Society must never confuse the words. This is the big lie.
It doesn’t help that a cynical society only sexualises (even children) to sell you things, to use this weakness against your best interest.
Millennials are so SJW because they think they stand to gain £££££££.
When the promises of the Left prove false, such as home ownership, stable work and retirement….
A sea change wouldn’t describe it, tsunami might.
We’re completely self-indulgent but it’s a secondary effect of generational depression.
Gen X were angry, we’re depressed, Z are apathetic.
“I’m a millennial, metaphorically I feel the moral corruption of my generation, whispering to me that I should just fuck bitchez and leave well enough alone, that I’ll never succed as a tradionalist, that I’ve fucked enough bitchez and can’t possibly marry, it’s hypocritical of me to support traditional marriage or heteronormativity. If I believed in demons, I would say the sexual immorality we were all but taught in school by the boomers is one.
I know that other millennials would be with us if they didn’t have easy access to genz pussy on tinder, and others would be with us if they didn’t see ideas as separate from their personal lives / see the path of redemption as hypocrisy.”
The degeneracy isn’t just killing people individually, it’s killing their futures collectively.
Enabled by people who detest them as Straight, White Males.
Now, what do you offer a Straight White Male to destroy himself, since you can’t do it yourself?
The Sexual Revolution. It ruined men.
Until that problem is addressed and acknowledged and well-known, the exploitation of man’s greatest weakness, then all the crying about universal suffrage is a red herring. There isn’t a single “right-wing” man I’ve seen online that isn’t as “Sex Positive” as the most virulent SJW. That’s why we’ve lost. Bacchus isn’t Jesus, it’s Satanic.
Postmodernism, any modernism, can only be defeated by a return to tradition, but the men are too weak.
They’re all too weak now.
From thinking with their dicks, worse than any case of PMS.
PMS never killed a race.
If you pointed at a random American man or woman on the street and shouted Whore! you’d probably be right.
Note the contradiction of ‘healthy’ ‘infected’. They know the cancer risk and doubtless others.
This is being pushed as healthy?
Meanwhile, there are probably psychiatric effects from HPV…
and this includes men, who retain STDs in their urethra (the area isn’t sterile), as well the inevitability of male birth control.
Nevermind, your fear is completely justified.
Feel free to make your own.
So let’s talk about the Red Pill, shall we?
This little red pill where any group is magically exempt from criticism… almost like a privilege. Offense is “how dare you imply my demographic is morally fallible!”