I saw one in a shop and I’m scared.
I saw one in a shop and I’m scared.
Not only will this be applied to men by gay guys with programming skills (introducing a way of faking harassment) BUT the timing of this accomplishes 2 things:
It revokes the right to not be humiliated (as in times of war) from Christian, moral women.
Being seen naked is a specific form of medical consent, lock the programmer up.
Use of likeness to produce illegal porn, passing off as real, distribution without model release signatures, violating religious right to modesty etc.
It violates fraud law, there’s defamation, human rights violations especially dignity, this is NOT Brave New World, America.
You are not entitled to other people’s bodies. Sexualization of unwilling participants is anti-human.
The Jews of Hollywood have failed to capture Gen Y and Z white women (more conservative than previous generations) so now fall back on this to digitally force them into prostitution.
Digital sex slavery. Cyber sex slaves. Bravo, atheistkult, another pillar of civilization besmirched.
Simply mock up the programmer’s mother in various pornographic poses to really drive the evil of this home.
I don’t think this software actually exists, more of an advanced form of photoshop.
Still illegal as sin. Public vice should be publicly shamed.
America is Freud’s retarded stage of genital fixation.
They have a Common Purpose.
Apparently decades of observed mental illness, substance abuse, attachment disorder, later divorce, the cycle of abuse with their own children, trauma including PTSD and high suicide rates don’t count as ‘harm’.
Apparently they need to spontaneously combust.
that one went down the memory-hole… put it back
Rapist nanny state, called it.
Sex Ed is grooming, people. Sexualisation of minors is grooming.
In full, top article:
“PIE members were lobbying NCCL officials for the age of consent to be reduced and campaigning for “paedophile love”.
reduced to zero
campaign for sweetest spot on a stake
Their view that children were not harmed by having sex with adults appears to have been adopted by those at the top of the civil liberties group.
Today we publish extracts from an NCCL report written for the Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1976 when Mrs Hewitt was general secretary.
It says: “Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offence. As the age of consent is arbitrary, we propose an overlap of two years on either side of 14.
They’re already prosecuting like this in cases by the CPS.
Minors can’t cry rape because their rapist is claiming willing.
And gets away with it. Look at the law.
‘Rape gangs’ are actually sex slave owners. It’s slavery.
(Pedo rings are just one form of sex slavery.)
Actually, consent documents would be a good idea but it’s called a marriage certificate.
‘Consent’ is a will o’ wisp for predators.
“Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage.
“The Criminal Law Commission should be prepared to accept the evidence from follow-up research on child ‘victims’ which show there is little subsequent effect after a child has been ‘molested’.
Gaslighting, victim blaming.
“The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage.
Sexual predator says its teeth aren’t sharp.
“The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and paedophile.”
Justice is dead.
Mrs Hewitt, 65, was general secretary between 1974 and 1983. After days of intense pressure, the former Labour MP for Leicester West finally admitted last week the NCCL was “naive and wrong” over its ties to PIE.
Sure. Save the hive.
She said: “Any suggestion that I supported or condoned the vile crimes of child abusers is completely untrue.
“As the NCCL archives demonstrate, I consistently distinguished between consenting relationships between homosexual men, on the one hand, and the abuse of children on the other.
men, not minors
and plenty of men are raped regardless
“When Jack Dromey, as NCCL chairman in 1976, vigorously opposed PIE at the NCCL AGM, he did so with the full support of the executive committee and myself as general secretary.”
However Labour MP Dromey’s opposition to PIE has been questioned by its former chairman, convicted paedophile Tom O’Carroll, who claims he felt “welcome” at NCCL meetings where he sat on the gay rights sub-committee.
Now they’re teaching it in primary schools!
Step by step instruction.
Mr O’Carroll said: “While they did not like PIE and did nothing to support our objectives, they were afraid of appearing insufficiently ‘right on’.
Thought Prison: “Effectiveness is irrelevant: for political correctness abstract and altruistic allocation is intrinsically superior to human agency; it is therefore morally necessary to replace individual freedom with systemic coercion, regardless of the consequences.”
Coercion vitiates consent. We, the People, do not consent.
“Consequently they were nothing like as strenuous and public in their efforts to distance themselves from PIE as they are now claiming.
“Dromey is quoted as saying ‘I was at the forefront of repeated public condemnations of PIE and their despicable views’. That’s news to me. Maybe by ‘public’ he meant imprecations muttered to cronies at his local pub.”
Dromey’s wife Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour party, was legal officer at the NCCL between 1978 and 1982. She has expressed her “regret” over the NCCL’s involvement with PIE but has pointedly declined to apologise.”
Bring back hanging when?
We need a referendum on how to deal with paedophiles.
I could think of a few.
I demand more objectification of men in films to balance it out, it’s only fair.
If we’re going for hypersexualised entertainment, don’t leave straight women out.
If it makes straight men uncomfortable, they’re just gay. (No, really).
It’s sexist that women have to actually watch for the plot.
The plot of comic films is shit. I say that with love.
What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
Do it for the economy.
Source: “Eleven Little Roosters” by RoosterTeeth
RESPOND TO DEMAND, HOLLYWOOD.
p.s. I am actually 100% serious.
Superman would’ve been a huge success as a series based on female viewers alone if he just wore a super codpiece. No heterosexual woman would deny this. You’d go. You’d hate yourself later, but you would.
Even Aquaman’s covering up, I am offended. Geeks wait decades for this zeitgeist.
It would’ve made Batman v Superman somewhat tolerable.
Captain Marvel might as well be Muslim with how much skin she doesn’t show, it’s stupid.
We all remember the kinky BDSM X-men uniforms. Those films were popular.
Indecency in the 1930s. I’m put off my ice cream by some of the things I’ve seen men get away with on beaches.
I love to hear about the ancient basis for Strauss-Howe but to remain published they missed out the sexual immorality and open debauchery that characterizes it. (And causes it).
The age that mocks virgins and worships the whores, a man put it to me once.
I was very young at the time so I didn’t believe it could exist, described it as Hell.
He didn’t laugh with me. Now I know it was strangely accurate, as I was forced to look at a picture of a Kardashian on the cover of a gossip magazine today while buying a drink. Virtuous people or anyone with genuine spirituality and values is considered the foolish one, because it is believed there are no standards unless inverted, no consequences for anything ever.
Any time period that judges your value based on your whorishness, male or female, is to be despised.
You are not your khakis, fine but you are not your body parts, that’s so much worse. You can buy new fucking khakis.
Pop culture isn’t popular, it pushes whores onto us as people we should admire and real people are sick of it. They have nothing to say, it’s just whorish bullshit everyday. Your penis and/or vagina work, we don’t care. We don’t care about your bowel function either. It’s the genital phase of Freud’s work, regressed and backward.
It isn’t bread and circuses, it’s shots and “Love” Island.
Perverting the word love to cover lust is another sign.
Saying sleep with instead of fuck.
Saying slut instead of whore.
Saying party animal instead of alcoholic.
Saying boyfriend/girlfriend instead of lover, even the word lover they cringe at and need to cover yet again what they do from themselves, living in sin.
Saying assault instead of rape.
Saying child predator instead of pedophile.
Lies, damn lies.
How many “right wing people” actually attack the PC polite phrases for degenerate acts, that give them a fig leaf of respectability? Take that leaf away and society can call it out. Keep it there and it festers uncontrollably.
These are the cultural Marxist inventions of the 20th century and you’re going to allow that?
You don’t want censorship? Start there. They’ve got you censoring yourself on that bullshit.
The deceit of one’s kin (and to abandon duties) comes from the various lusts – to control, dominate, rape (as in to take) all sorts of things.
Status symbols, that’s all the spiritual life some people have, junk and vapid toys.
The pride leads to lust, leads to wrath, leads to avarice etc. etc. It’s a horrific chain.
People can say all they want that now is the most peaceful time in history. But those who are not blind can see the truth. No other generation had expended as many resources in such a small amount of time. No other generation has destroyed as much nature as we have. No other generation has been as dependant as we are on the resources at hand. The world is heading towards one of the greatest catastrophes in human history.
I hate to pick up this broken record but I’m gonna play it again.
Do you realize how most sins are no longer tried as crimes? Even rape and murder can now simply not be investigated, because of who you are, that is lawlessness. Already here babe.
That’s why we live in the worst of times, worse than the endgame of Rome, they don’t even know they’re evil or when questioned about what evil does, laugh and enjoy it. That is Satanism, the essence of it. The pride, the savagery, the nihilism, the hedonism. We think this is normal, historically the modern world is a monster.
We’re trapped in a societal prison with all stripes of criminals, who are celebrated by one another, and no judge, no justice. Every dystopia is a documentary for now. Future historians will balk that we suffered so much evil to thrive.
Drunkenness, lechery, debauchery alone would put at least 2/3 citizens in prison and they’d be happy to be there. They’d claim up is down and evil is the ultimate, supreme good.
How has evil not corrupted their hearts? You can’t be paying attention and think most modern humans are good. Know a tree by its fruit. Their lives aren’t a single percent holy. They are disgusted by the idea.
Humans didn’t abide by the law, natural or divine doesn’t matter. There will be consequences and my only regret is the few good people (who are scattered everywhere) will be severely inconvenienced by them. At BEST.
Because the stupid or evil people (depending on your pill chroma) want to be “independent” now, sure.
While it’s the feast years and they can wrack up debts.
What about when anything goes wrong? Literally any-thing.
Who will the Mob of degenerates pile onto? With their pre-rehearsed “learned my lesson, it was all a mistake, now you owe me to fix this for me” routine? The rotting stench of entitlement.
That’s right….. they’ll expect a bailout on every level, a level playing field too, they’ll demand their sins be erased because they have no shame, never did. No guilt. They act like psychopaths and have the mindset to match, pure predator. Predator of fellow man. That is the part that kills me.
This cannot end well.
But an end must come.
We’re returning to 50s morality where strangers can’t talk to one another without it being weird.
Here, it’s still pretty weird and not just a London thing, it’s English and cultural.
LEWDNESS IS ALREADY ILLEGAL.
Disturbing the peace and other offences.
Honour culture coming back. We didn’t need to say it plainly to fellow high IQ Europeans with a Christian culture. Criminal White men who tried it on were fought with canes, umbrellas and hat pins. They tried to claim sexist, despite attacking first. We could stop the conflicts any time we like with deportations of rule-breakers. One strike and you’re out, we have the CCTV. But is it worth hurting some poor white girl for existing, for someone who doesn’t have to be here in the first place, should we wait until there’s already a trauma? Women don’t respond to sexual attention in public like men, it’s a negative experience. Singling out a person in public is bullying. When it’s sexual, it’s acting like looking good is a sin (so women dress more like men and they’re still whining). Women don’t need to act like men or the way predators want them to act (gaslighting, “you should take it as a compliment!” – nope, still illegal). It’s humiliating, intentionally, it’s mocking, equivalent to groping a child (also low testosterone). It’s forced sexualization so traditional men are most opposed to harassment, the street isn’t a free-for-all brothel – the assumption is No. We don’t allow one group (children) to be harmed in public (by those who find them sexually attractive) blithely (children can’t help looking cute/what they are either) so no, this isn’t Brave New World, there is no entitlement to the bodies of others. You can’t rob a bakery because you’re hungry, we expect people in the First World to act like a human, dogs can have more control on these matters! Does cake before a hungry man have more rights than a white woman in her homeland? Who do we care about more, ingroup safety or outgroup “honour”? Who is we? Guest right has long expired. Social trust is more important than anyone’s feigned feelings of dishonour, they dishonoured themselves by their criminal actions.
This problem won’t go away. The lower IQ, the weaker self control. Weak-willed people have no excuse. If you don’t like the West, move. You aren’t important.
The subtext is: to prevent harassment/rape, women should look less like women.
This has never been true. It’s a blatant lie, blaming the victim. Covered head to toe, women are attacked and have been historically. It’s like saying a poor man is never robbed. And how can a rich man or an attractive woman stop being, stop existing? Laughable psychopathy on display, to insist the world magically alter its properties because these people don’t want to control their degeneracy. The predator DESERVES to be met with force.
Victims don’t deserve it, that’s a just world fallacy!
Maybe if you’re nice to the tiger/Muslim, it won’t eat/rape you! That isn’t how predation works, cuck.
Should you take it as a compliment that a burglar found your house “nice enough” to rob? You should enjoy the slanderous “attentions” of the SJWs!
The real meaning is “let us”, be completely passive, let us harm you and play along (don’t “snitch” and assert your human rights). We don’t take that aiding and abetting, enabling approach to predators in the civilized world.
A straight male sexual predator will be attracted to women because they’re women, whatever they look like. You cannot help being in that category. It’s genetic, the way you were born and exist. Like a child cannot help being in a pedophile’s predation group. Is it their fault for looking too cute? Should we ban cuteness? Predators are a sheer minority and we mustn’t fall for their tricks or lies in enabling them. They are wrong, not the people they harm. There is no Original Sin of whiteness or attractiveness, unless you’re insane.
But harassment’s always been illegal?
Why should your culture come last? That’s why they are there, to be in your culture.
The hypoagency proclaimed by sexual predators is detestable. Going to a nudist beach shouldn’t “provoke” rape, you piece of shit. Children walk around naked too…. just saying.
We are not America. They allowed in the past century, their laws to slide to speak to and treat one another like shit. Watch how many harassment laws they break on “prank” shows to lube you up for it. That isn’t funny.
Meanwhile, not a word on groping, grabbing, rape.
“What’s key is … that the laws of the French republic forbid insulting, intimidating, threatening and following women in public spaces,”
They need these laws now. How long until more etiquette laws are brought in?
The PUA scam pretends to sell non-white men a method for turning any white woman into a free whore. It’s a scam but the “techniques” which legally qualify as harassment will land them in court eventually, including incitement to harass, I tried warning for years. They made their bed. Prison bed.
It’s incitement to harass on a sexual (sex, noun) and race basis too, so like… triple illegal.
If you ask a question more than once, it’s coercion. Goes for sales too. If the first No isn’t respected, why should the 20th? Although wearing someone down is an abuse tactic.
It’s like the French women who had to move but still said diversity was good because, men don’t realize, they might literally be murdered for saying anything less to the press. Diversity takes away your liberty. To know who rules over you…
Cut off the welfare state to the non-French and they’ll leave. It’s the only way to handle an infestation of leeches, cut off supply.
Emma Thompson complains her daughter was grabbed but says nothing about the legal right to self-defense or fear of being stabbed and melted with acid.
When you can’t defend yourself, you’re a slave.
Meanwhile, on the child connection
Minors cannot consent. Set it to 18/age of majority!
Burn in Hell, scumbag.
The sheer volume of rumours I’ve heard about him and his Pleasure Island palace.
Apparently, his son was induced to try or saw things no child should.
The objective fact alone is bad enough.
He’d lend out women like you’d lend out tupperware. We now must live in the sexualised culture, including of teens, that he made. Oh, what an icon. And even if you don’t participate in the degeneracy, you’ll be held to this postmodern sexual revolution culture’s standards and objectification, where a woman dressed nicely (AKA as a woman, not androgynous or manly) is considered fair game to harass. Cunture, surely.
And they wonder why women en masse made less effort with their appearance in direct proportion to the objectification in media that any woman looking womanly = hooker, and can, nay, should be solicited!
Women used to dress like ladies, yes, when men weren’t allowed to shout at them in the street for it.
Maybe men can switch on the rational part of their brains and think that maybe, just maybe, this negative reinforcement, this demeaning punishment, has something to do with it?
The thought process goes as such
I could wear this nice dress, but it’s likelier I’ll be harassed, stalked and possibly attacked. Feminine clothing attracts sexual predators. Guess I’ll wear trousers again, on second thoughts.
[However, sexual signalling is not a thing, it does not exist academically or otherwise.]
I’ve seen men try to blame women whatever we were wearing. and use that nonsense term to intellectualize it. No, it’s because they have a vagina, can’t help that. Can’t help having secondary sexual characteristics either i.e. a figure. Any clothing will show that up.
Porn-addled lewdness has caused this so-called androgyny problem. It isn’t a problem, it’s self-protection in an era where men don’t punish their own; when we do risk it to try and express God-given femininity, ask female friends what happens. We even have special PC terms for what was formerly only a way ghetto people spoke to one another “the wrong sort of attention” – not from women, though, was it? Yet another great thing white people adopted from black culture. White men are, as the old saying goes, ‘acting black’, so white women dress like the men. Common sense.
Reduce crime and women will feel safe enough to look like women again.
along with the so-called ‘feminine penis’. I despised typing that. Curse you internet.
I’m in a teaching mood.
Called a anasyromenos pose.
Onto the non-sexual flashing, it’s only because modern culture is heavily sexualised that we instantly view nudity as such.
Anasyrma, women flashing, is classically used to ward off evil, including demons. This is why feminists expose themselves.
It’s also a de-erotic display of nudity, non-sexualising it and normalising it like it was in classical times.
I mean, it’s just hair. Men have it on their face too.
We might call the behaviour flashing but there’s no sexual intent or arousal whatsoever, it’s comparable to the Greco-Roman attire that frequently exposed breasts or became translucent under direct sunlight. There’s no shame because we also show other body parts like arms and ankles, but it shouldn’t be objectified as sexual by a witness either.
There are female flashers and voyeurs but they are incredibly rare and the typical by far is male perpetrator, female victim. It falls under the clinical category of courtship disorder.
Meanwhile, the minority of men who sexualise everything in existence unless they aren’t involved, (then go on a long tirade about objects like sex toys being a sign of mental illness in women) are also the reason stuff like this exists.
Can the BlowYo sex toy actually replicate the feeling of a blow job?
It’s quite funny when such men, trying to appear worldly, are completely naive to the fact vibrators exist for men.
Have at it.
Should you be worried about your vagina absorbing the ingredients in your lube?
I wouldn’t be shocked if this were bad for the male microbiome too.
I like watching audiences. You can tell a lot about a speech/lecture/talk by watching its audience. These ones look like ugly, snorting pigs, snuffling for truffles and squealing in ignorance when something intelligent happens above their heads.
To repeat an old joke, BBC – British Bolshevik’s Channel.
“Barbie is descended from a sex toy”
“Little girls learn to flirt with their fathers.”
“Sex education is propaganda for promiscuity.” ~ the man on the panel.