Video: not an argument

People miss how beautiful that expression is. However, in specific cases, they should be able to break it down precisely why or they themselves have no reply, no argument, simply an assertion.
You have no requirement to answer a non-question, it’s a habit of socializing that we speak upon the completion of a sentence, it doesn’t require that sentence have merit. The Burden of Proof rests on the initial speaker, still.

Yet it can’t be used to outright deny or dismiss without having a specific reason why.


Meanwhile, the only way to effectively deal with r-types, ignore them, however loudly they scream.

See Best Post.


You only protect your own, but they have made it clear they are against you. Don’t lift a finger.
They say strength is bad until they want you to use it on their behalf.

Hey, if they’re so strong without their weapons, if their arguments have the same calibre as a bullet, go right on ahead and let them stand independently, you oppressive shitlord, and die that way if necessary. It’s what they would’ve wanted.

If evil imports evil, what is there to save?

Yourself, is the answer to that question.

Self-interest is rational. Pathological altruism is insanity.
You help those who would help you, the other side of the golden rule. Darwin’s rules. Sacrifice for people who would sacrifice you is patriotism dialed up to the incredible level of a cartoon character.

I swear most of Molly’s job is talking down the autistic from their pedestal of self-righteous stupidity.
If anyone deserves the Rasputin treatment, it’s a terrorist. Thankfully, your taxes go to pay people with guns already. The Parliament attacker guy? Shot, if memory serves, by a white guy with glasses. In a country that stupidly restricted guns. Even we don’t need you, Gun Bro. If the State can’t do the basic thing of shooting the bad guys for us…

I’ve never, ever heard of a liberal defending a conservative from any attack, ever.
Anyone?
They are not like you. They do not like you. Partially because you would defend them, implicitly stating they’re too weak to do it themselves. If you respect them as adults, leave them be. Let them live (and die) free. You are not their precious State, you have no duty to them, you are not getting paid, that is not your job ~z-snap~. You can’t play hero to two villains. They have engineered this setup on purpose. By importing violent left-wingers, they get the distraction to sneak off (reward of cowardice: survival) and the claim to victory (reward of victory). They literally do not lose.

If they don’t value their own safety, why should you?
America is too diverse to be united. You have the Diverse States of America.

He’s wrong about signalling (thinking) as a sign of tribe. Anyone can signal, its value is nil. How many of those diverse callers would help him, if he needed it? The odds are against, aren’t they? There are plenty of r-types signalling K as the idea spreads to new groups and creeps into mainstream awareness. The other day I heard a random cafe-owner say, “I want to protect this country, I’m like a wolf.” R-types invade by signalling. It’s a social invasion, they’re the fifth column, the barbarians sacking Rome from the inside, a swarm of locusts crying out as they hit you. History has taught us the hard way that ideological unity comes from genetic homogeneity.
The culture war is one of ideas. The weapon is a meme. A tiny little piece of information, a snippet of truth.

Signallers are, more often than not, liars.

They signal whatever ‘virtue’ is powerful, hoping for scraps from that table.

They are the begging dogs of society, asking you to hunt for them. It’s like every time Roosh calls for “someone! do something!” and his little internet boyfriends scurry to rescue the damsel and White Knights whatever he asks for. What are you, his wife? At least “think of the children!” defends the helpless. Adults have no business defending other adults. They rise and fall on their own merit, raised or dashed on their own petard.
K-society says: They do it themselves or it doesn’t get done.
R-society? It’s very espionage, ultra deceptive.
They offer you friendship while holding a knife in their other hand. They extend an olive branch first because it’s less effort, not because they like you or believe in the healing power of metaphor. There is a bargain they author, that you never asked for, and if you don’t like it, the carrot, they’ll ‘offer’ the stick. This is called a con. Con artists rely on confidence and trust. Virtue signallers rely on confidence and trust…

They want control over you, that is their power, to wiggle you like a little puppet.

In a victim culture, they are the biggest victims. In a K-shift, they are magically K-leaning.
Occam says: It’s all a lie.

I warned you, years ago. I knew these interlopers would pop up like fleas.
They don’t mind you dancing the right-wing jig as long as it’s to their exact tune.

Guess which is which.

If your friends are your enemies, you’ll never succeed. How to test?

A k-type invented the expression: actions speak louder than words. Until I see you sacrifice for this tribe, it owes nothing to you. If all you have are words, speak to the birds.

Just because someone is smoke-signalling your tribe doesn’t mean they’re on your side. Indeed, this makes it less likely, a friend doesn’t feel the need to keep reminding you they’re not a foe, not a threat, like they’re anticipating something…

DO NOT TRUST A DODGY SIGNAL.

The incongruence should ping to you. What’s in it for you?

In the super-complex theories of strategy, this is called A Trap. It’s a primitive form of distraction by claiming Ally while wearing the coat of your enemy to cuckold him for whatever reason before attacking when factors are on your side and you can turn your coat back and show your true colours. This is the problem with games like chess, where the colours never change sides because they were bribed or got bored. You never get betrayed in chess because the enemy never falters and it’s all very polite and open, two equal lines fairly opposing one another with Queensberry rules. That was 2nd generation warfare, we’re on four. Then again, maybe it’s a commentary on the reality that a leopard can’t change its spots. Who knows? I certainly don’t.

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/226350.html
“Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.”
They don’t fully quote it for some strange reason. The Bible is actually very witty.

Ask – why do they want your trust? Why aren’t they doing literally anything else? What’s their game? 

It’s a great way to buy time when you know you’d lose in a fair fight.

aka cheating

If this was the 15th century, a ship running up your flag is probably pirates.

And they won’t kill you with rum.

Newsflash: BAD GUYS LIE. THEY LIE OR THEY WON’T FOOL YOU LONG ENOUGH TO WIN.

Back to terrorism. All the way back, centuries and centuries and centuries, like the ideas.

Self-proclaimed liberals have a lot in common with the mythological ‘moderate Muslim’; that is to say, they will claim to be loving and giving until they have power and numbers to be the opposite of those things.

The ‘American Indian’ only gave with the expectation of receiving more in future.

A liberal is a dictator waiting to happen. Biding their time until everyone else has disarmed and made nice.
They know exactly what they are doing. That is what guys like these do not get. Everyone else is slowly waking up. We make memes.

comment
“So if I’m understanding Stefan’s argument correctly it is: “While you certainly have the right to defend yourself, you have zero obligation to defend anyone else against a threat.” Is that the argument you are taking issue with? If so, what is your counterargument? If there is an obligation to defend others where does it come from?”
They want all conservatives to rush to protect them, like the police. While we are occupied, they survive and screw over the next batch of rueful idiots. The type who, at the Gates of Saint Peter, would claim the moral victory is more important.
The self-styled ‘liberals’ scoff at loyalty to children, nuclear family and country… until it comes to discussions of noblesse oblige (without class???), pensions, the social contract and human rights (without property rights). Then it’s all about universalism, collectivism and helping those who can’t/won’t help themselves. They are morally relative, liberal with logic ….wrong, in bad faith (100% deliberate). What they say is usually ‘not an argument’ because it comes from a hypocrite (no-proof), a deceiver (valid use, not ad hominem) and they argue it from bad faith, really pushing something else entirely under the radar.

They are loyal to their own body, especially the neck. They don’t want to save the pandas, they want to save their own skin.

In common speech here, they’re ‘trying it on’ i.e. they know they’re lying to get what they want and disappear when their half comes due, but they’re hoping you don’t know that.

All their virtue signals are overt pleas to get, without giving. 

Argument and clause. Devil and detail. Plan and plot.

Essentially it’s;
>HELP THE OUTGROUP! THE INDIVIDUAL IS NOTHING TO THE GROUP! SACRIFICE AT ALL COSTS!
>…STOP DEFINING THE INGROUP! THAT MODEL IS REDUNDANT AND EVIL!
and that, my friends, is why we mock them.
See: Why mockery?

It is also why you shouldn’t trust ambassadors. 300 was right.

That diverse cast of people calling into Molyneux are attempting to appease him while he gains power (they smell a whiff and cannot yet crush him) and then to advise him to his destruction once he has gained it (and after they have gained his trust). That is what high-IQ r-types DO. The toxic friends of the world. The fairweather traitors and degenerate preachers.

Clinically, they have many names. Sociopath tops the list.

Question a normal person: #crickets

Question a sociopath: you are (lie), (lie) and (lie), evil person! Appease me! Account for your sin!

They’ve found a scapegoat to slaughter.

Sociopaths especially detest those who describe their tactics to the masses for protection.

You can’t defame the truth, though, can you?

What happened to most of the edgelords?

They weren’t.

The edgelords, with no edges. The type to assume woman and feminist are synonymous, and liberal means gay, and refer to women as ‘females’ and ‘girls’, never noticing the ripple of cringe.

They’d use some of the same words (cuck, degenerate) but it was an empty power play to make shekels from personal branding, usually YT.

Most so-called alt-righters shouting it from the rooftops (and alt-lite, if that’s still happening) are just signallers punching down at feminists (just the women); they don’t even believe in CM, they don’t know, care or wanna know. They want someone to beat on and women seem a good target.

On any other topic e.g. Roosh’s race, they’re cuckier than the cucks. They retreat so far up their own arse, everything smells like shit. They are milquetoast keyboard alphas, totally incompetent IRL. Look at the manosphere. Look addit. Ask them: are all men equal? 

responses are hilarious and full of dissonance

wrong dr house urgh shut up idiots

they believe in sexual hierarchies, but also there are no leagues?
sex with a woman is good, the woman having sex with you is bad
there is no Hell but God’s a good idea
opinions mean nothing, unless a man has them
men can’t be ugly but women are shallow bitches
modern woman is entitled, man deserves social reparations
women are the cause of the world’s problems but totally incompetent
men have no duty to society but it sure owes us
real men…..
science is great because it questions things but don’t question me
projection is only real when women do it
men are always rational and therefore superior
women can’t be smart, look at this graph
I need a smart woman who’ll let me manipulate and humiliate her, but no other guy

The white Muh Dicks.

Bullies, all of them, pretending to stand for something other than their flaccid egocentrism.

The sort to look up to Nietzsche, seriously. You should be impressed.

As for degeneracy, those hypocrites and false prophets….

It’s no loss to our cause, believe me.
They were never with our cause.
They never understood us. Technically, they cucked us for a while, or tried to, cheering against our enemies doesn’t make them allies.

Virtue Signals in painful detail and the 1%

http://www.socialmatter.net/2017/02/06/ever-wanted-know-virtue-signals/

“Regardless of why and how virtue signals acquired their prestige, it is worth acknowledging the end result up front. First, simply as a matter of mental discipline: most right-wingers who are considering counter-signaling understand that a counter-signal makes them literally Hitler, but are surprised by the amount of uninhibited (and apparently genuine) class-hatred they will receive. Because the contempt comes as a surprise, it can be disconcerting and demoralizing. Being mentally prepared for it helps. If your social status is a sore point in real life, knowing that leftists treat everyone this way can help you stay detached. If you find the contempt stinging because you’ve never experienced anything like it, treat it as research into how leftists actually feel about the underclass they pretend to adore.”

They think of poor people as pets.

“But conversely, understanding how much political posturing in normal life is motivated by apolitical status-seeking, you can tailor your rhetoric much more effectively. When people virtue signal: play dumb, mock them, or pretend to find “problematic” attitudes (racist? patronizing? cis-centric?) in their virtue signals. Even explicitly praising a virtue signaler’s level of education (use the word “articulate”!) will discomfit him: blatant virtue signals are still virtue signals, but blatant status signals are tacky. The need to signal one’s status betokens low status, so a signal must be subtle and understated to communicate high status.”

Give them a disgust expression from the corner of your eye, immediately hide it then change the subject.

As if they’d told you they use hookers, at a children’s nursery group.

If you make them feel awkward, they stop.
That’s the secret emotional trigger you need.

“If would-be virtue signalers discover that whenever they try to signal their status only drops, they will get frustrated with signaling games, lose interest, and start to resent people whose virtue signals are more elaborate and earnest.”

Already happening, attacking other left-wingers for making them look bad, itself a signal.
No True Lefty, SJWier than thou.

See: Why mockery?
Well, it got me Brexit and Trump in the White House.
If only Farage for PM, maybe coalition.

http://www.socialmatter.net/2017/01/29/heres-how-trump-should-tax-the-rich/
CONSUMPTION TAX.
Champagne, holidays, festivals.
Things only rich people buy and in bulk.
Nothing that affects the poor or even the majority of the middle-class.
Instant vote-winner, since you can drop their taxes as futile.
The 1% is almost half-Jewish, any attacks will be called anti-Semitic.

comment “Stop taxing people’s labour, investment and accomplishments.”

That’s the point of taxing the right things.

The hypocrisy of the signalling Right

I lost a bet to write this because it’s the reddest of redpills. Shove it up your rectum, there’s plenty of room.

You’re probably not gonna like me for this. Stop reading if you’re easily trigg-ed (cough Forney cough).

But I call out these things wherever I see them. No penis passes. No ingrouping/No Enemies on the Right special appeals, because that is my point. You are not right wing, if we’re still going by what is likely an outdated paradigm based on behaviours, in light of identity politics, which are largely innate.

Literally most of the supposed Right Wing has a serious issue with hypocrisy. You wanna lead? #1 Be the example. Otherwise, GTFO. It’s literally the bare minimum for inclusion. If you want a stable society of smug marrieds, you need to get married or at least desire marriage if you meet your One. Don’t advise other people to do what you would not or cannot do yourself. You don’t get to ride the carousel and then complain why do carousels exist? You. You’re the consumer keeping this damaged system (SMP) in business.

Common sense, seriously.

Give up your own degeneracy THEN I’ll trust you’re opposed to it.

well leaves nope no go leaving

Otherwise, you’re an empty signalling piece of shit.
No better than the SJWs. Narcissism of small differences, it burns like your probable STDs.

The rest of us can totally see it. 20/20.
I’m finally pointing it out.

People who cannot control themselves seek to control others. This is the rule with SJWs and the people who repurpose the fashy memes seriously.  Note they don’t have the originality or sense of humour to come up with good ones themselves?
For example, these people with negative Social Intelligence come on here asking if I’m actually a man but anytime they wanna criticise me, I magically become a woman. Okay, that’s misogyny (and magical thinking) and all your claims to meritocracy fall flat when you do this. This is why feminists laugh at you, which is fine, but by extension and association (you steal our memes and terms) at people like me. The MSM loves you because you drag down us.

Minor point: I hate how being funny is now seen as a masculine thing when it’s really a gay thing. Going by pop culture. Which is actually a feminine thing, if we’re selecting a gender. I’m actually very femme in my critique. There’s nothing wrong with me. There is something wrong with expecting women to act like men (feminist programming, pornography) socially and sexually.

You think I’m bitchy? That isn’t an insult to an actual woman. I’m meant to be femme, fam.
I’m funny and I’m feminine. I don’t care if you approve or I’d camwhore on YT and sit next to Milo on panels for Old Media shekels.

Don’t like it?

well fuck off gary oldman

This isn’t a safe space for crybabies, I don’t give a damn which side you claim to be on. Know a tree by its fruit, motherfuckers and wifeswipers. If you think actual cuckoldry is funny, and Beta Bux, you aren’t really party to our level of integrity or the ideas discussed therein. We don’t actually hate other men. We critique politi-cucks because they sell out everyone and our futures, female and yes, your competition, other men. Real men. Men with a future. Manly men who don’t need to keyboard warrior themselves by slagging off the opposite sex before they cry to sleep at night, Tinder still open in their free hand.

It’s like the old people who ‘don’t get’ GIFs (cough Roosh cough). Well, you aren’t the target audience, how is that my problem? You’re acting like I should change the way I operate for your comfort.

Back to the people who judge everyone to distract from the total genetic and social failures of themselves. This doesn’t work.

They’ll bitch about Sandra Fluke slutting it up, but when they slut it up, that’s fine for society! It doesn’t increase everyone’s insurance payments, either, does it? They get real cagey about it. Why the shame? Why hide your face and name, AlphaBro5000?

I'm so vague I may as well be inhuman unless my ego catches up to me

If women were really attracted to your beliefs, why hide them IRL? It’s such a teenage fuck fantasy but coming from old men (30+, no excuse) discussing ‘swimming in pussy’ seriously it makes you wonder if the Western values can be saved. CM got to them and they don’t even know what they’re pushing. They care about being cool and would sell their souls to do it. It’s pathetic. People like that detract from our moral authority if we allow them to feed off our ideas, leech our readers and take donations (whores of Patreon) like a Church of Depravity. You know they aren’t paying taxes.

You can easily see them whining like entitled babies because they can’t find a Mummy to marry. Why? Society doesn’t owe you a whole other person, you have to earn it. Step 1: stop crying.

Their abandonment expectation pings strongly male borderline.
If you think everyone else (female) is crazy, get your own head checked, maybe.

They can’t get women because wife material aren’t lesbians. We see how bitchy and effete they are. Gay men are the original misogynists, as I’ve observed feminists point out in a rare, redpill moment.

They can’t attract women to the ideology because they try to kick us out. It’s intentional.

To quote Aurini, of all people;

Well who do they hate? They hate the original fans. All these movements, the masses show up and hate the founders. They wanna moderate the tone, make it more inclusive

The projection is strong and true. See the Alt Light. I called this months ago when they tried outgrouping the AR founders by calling us… cucks.

i don't even whatever

Oh noes, what-ever will be do?!!! Of all the insults? Are you kitten-mee?

why confused what wtf

I was aghast at the time. I mean, not bothered, they can’t stop us or our memes and they certainly can’t control us like that rant seemed to imply. We’re smarter. We have the IQ in this equation. We don’t scream into video cameras.

what ho whatwhat hello yep yes yeah we know english

On their own sites it’s worse. They censor like SJWs.

They think Ban Hammer makes them correct.

It’s the SJW paradigm. They have SJW tactics, like safe spaces, censoring and doxxing. They’ve tried to fake doxx me, which was relatively funny as a study in projection.

These people don’t wanna overturn the r-selected Sodom, they benefit from it. Watch what happens when you offer to restrict their porn to 18+. Wailing like a toddler. Is that a pro-family conservative value, people?

Here’s a tidbit of wisdom for ya.

What’s good for the goose, is good for the gander. Know what this means?

If it’s good for men, it’s good for women too. This is how logic works. Either the behaviour is prosocial or antisocial.

Nothing to do with feminist equality. Feminists breathe, breathing isn’t feminist.
Quit it with the non-sequiturs.

The Muh Dicks can go to the Middle East where their culture belongs, where they’ll feel really comfy in a Taharrush or Eve Teasing setup. Because a woman in a miniskirt is the problem and showing skin is evil (ask yourselves what species of ‘Christian’ is this and did it survive the Industrial Revolution). Meanwhile, men walk around with their bitch tits out and women magically resist the temptation to rape them.

Back to the rampant sexuality, which is meant to be healthy because Darwin? These people didn’t read Darwin, clearly. He’s very stern and disapproving of bestial sexualities. It’s inhuman. He discusses breeding, not ONSs. Hence, non-human animals are not degenerate, they lack the agency and choice and birth control.
Where exactly, did Darwin say this thing about men being able to fuck whatever and wherever? Where did the biology touch you, Jerry? No place for naturalistic fallacy, the average IQ of Alt Righters is higher than your Asian anime waifu. They’ll admit objectively that culture is over-sexualised, freely, but if you dare suggest, if you dare question Internet-Alpha-Man, that he might be oversexed and it might be unhealthy if you look at the psychiatry and suicide rates…. you must be a feminist because, apparently, they follow the Biblical virtue of prudence now?

Detour: They say ‘Double Standard’ like it’s an argument? They use it like a thought-terminating cliche, like a K/O instant win of the argument. This is the poison you get corrupting us from the manosphere. That’s not an argument. It’s basic logical hypocrisy. You say human rights, that applies to all humans. You say meritocracy, that is blind to anything identity and purely based on merit. Double Standard is a fallacy when there are two sets of rules to one society. It cannot work practically. It’s a logical inconsistency. Do you understand how stupid you sound?

It’s maths, you manwhores.
Has the HPV penetrated that much of your microbiome?
We all know about the hypofrontality. It’s brain damage, reeeee.

Women are people, worthy of respect. Women are half the equation for a prosperous society.

If you disagree with that, you’re not traditional.

The West was built off the backs and blood and sweat of good women and good men. Neither is the enemy. The feminists want that Gender War to have something to do. That isn’t looking in a mirror. Anyone who wants to turn you against your natural inclination to the opposite sex is an enemy to the nuclear family, they are anti-natal.

Ask these people if they want Hook-Up Culture, State Sponsored Abortions and Free (Taxpayer) Birth Control (chemical abortifacents). If they say Yes to any of these, they are Left wing. Instead, they are deceivers, trying to subvert the right wing with the promise of Free Goodies and dopamine addiction. Same way they did with the poor black community, look at your future.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Black-Mans-Guide-Out-Poverty/dp/1503119688

You’re just an inverted feminist, with the sexes switched out. Call yourselves MRA, you wanna rentseek and feed from the trough with the other piggies. Call yourselves MGTOW, you never actually Go, do you? You never leave women alone, especially online? You seek us out. It’s creepy. We can see you’re not doing any of the things you claim to be. We are smarter than you. You may delude yourself, other people aren’t wearing Blinders.

Men can err. Women can err. Neither sex is good or evil. Common sense.

They claim they want Patriarchy but a Patriarchy would’ve strung them up by now for corrupting their daughters and binge-drinking. Don’t get me started on the creepy pedophilia of sex tourism. They’re lying, they’re empty signalling hoping to win points from both sides.

The priors are all wrong, all the way down. Turtle logic. All the way down. The circular reasoning of It’s all female’s fault (fun fact: most women aren’t feminists) because I said so. …And? Anyone with your notch count, worse who’s proud of it, is no moral authority. This isn’t a game, this is the future of society at stake.

But women are natural conservatives, once we’ve bred and have something to protect, men are natural liberals if you look at any worker’s union, whether or not they breed. Look at the class pyramid Marx pointed out, the majority is working class and the majority of working class men vote Left, men are natural socialists because it backs up their natural provision duties. Quit projecting and look at the facts. If you look at voter trends as I have on here, men are the liberal problem. Quit applying American SJW on campus demo BS to the rest of the world. It’s a bubble. It isn’t real, look at the stats or be content in your laziness/ignorance.

It’s a class issue and SJWs will do anything to deny that, because they’re upper-middle privileged.
You don’t see working class men making bank by bitching on Youtube, do you? Too busy working to keep people like you in antibiotic shots, which thanks to people like you, are now failing.

The wages of sin used to be paid by the sinners. This was just.
These people will protect these things, this corrupt degeneracy, this ‘culture’.

After all this time, they still don’t get the Matrix references.
And these people claim to have founded us? Bich plz.

They don’t want to revolution or reform anything. They care for pleasure and being narcissists, pulling one over on conservatives by signalling as one while playing feminist to screw them too gives them extra shots of pozz dopamine.

They are parasite singles, as the Japanese correctly fingered. This is simple;

If someone claims to complain about degeneracy, they’d better not be contributing to it.

That’s the sound of a thousand body pillows being stuffed into mattresses in the distance.

Nod and back away from the crazies

The same people who never hold the male feminists and SJWs and founder of FEMEN accountable. Because Penis Pass. This is, to turn a phrase, hella dodgy.

There isn’t a separate Deadly Sins list for women and men. You’re either going to Hell in this White Christian society you claim to want, or you’re not. Simple enough reasoning, you’d think.

For pointing any of this out I get called a feminist. Really? Ad hominem doesn’t work, silly. I’m still correct and the points stand on their own merit whatever you dislike about my personality or my tone (tone policing wahey). Really, I was mean? Welcome to reality, remove the dummy from your gaping rainbow cakehole. You kiss your mama with that misogynist maw? If all women are whores, that includes your Mother. I tend to agree. Idiots cannot see their unintended consequences or unfortunate (logical) implications, but it’s funny to those of us with an IQ with digits of three.
Good luck keeping a Patriarchy when no woman will sleep with you, dipshits. You need our support and our complicity to breed. We aren’t robots that keep the babies of rape, either.

Consent requires a basic level of intelligence to know when and what to reject. [Also why if women can’t vote, fucking them would be pedophilia, legally. Either we have agency and can make such weighty decisions like reproduction or not. Pick ONE.]

Even ‘crazy’ feminists need the security of birth control before sleeping with the crazy of you, man who wants ‘no-strings’ sex like that has ever existed in the history of humanity. Sluts are damaged forever, but ignore player burnout. Why does no decent woman want me? [1]

Listen to yourselves.

I listen to myself.

Darwin doesn’t apply to sterile sex and even IF she got pregnant, you’d be the first lot to 180 your ‘principles’ (really signals) and demand an abortion OR an exemption from child support.

To quote pieces from elsewhere.

The world doesn’t owe you sex. That’s entitlement. No IFs or BUTs. That’s entitlement. Put down the porn. They’re the male Sandra Flukes expecting the rest of us to give them orgasms…. because they exist, therefore they deserve it.

Did porn tell you that?

porn cheat archer

If you think hypersexuality is a positive force for society, you’re a feminist.

The Sexual Revolution was feminist. The defining cornerstone. If you wouldn’t unwind that, you don’t want a Patriarchy. Either it existed historically, in which case the feminists are right, or it never existed like Male-Only Suffrage and you’re wrong. Again.
They have no power over men without sex, as the failed strike not to sleep with Trump supporters has proven. Turns out, most of his supporters were straight and female (women win elections in democracy by sheer force of numbers) so this is awkward. Your definitive woman-hating ideologies fail basic predictions. Congrats, you’re in the same category as global warming. Hug it out, happy non-breeder. 

They would agree with that sentiment, I think. I have no illusions where these supposedly right-wing males stand. The lays never lie. Your politics is proven by your personal life.

Women being biologically distinct from men doesn’t make us inferior. What I just described is sexual dimorphism. It’s a silly question, morality doesn’t apply in science. Feminists try to force the issue, doesn’t work. Either it’s true or it isn’t and if you choose to make spurious claims, yeah, people will think you’re full of it, because you’re hiding behind the apron strings of Science like a surrogate rhetorical Mommy. Oh, you have one study? Call Al Gore. At least he commits. Read a real book. The maximal difference is within chance level, about 5% tops. Unlike race, which you deny while using the term ‘racist’ for opponents. The modern human is androgynous too, so this is probably far less in our reality. Apply logic, remove Womb Envy (as real as Penis Envy).

Like, I’ve been here for years. Literally years. I know how this goes.

You can’t outsignal an original member.

These male entryists, these absolute antisocial degenerate losers wheedle their way into a successful cultural bandwagon (e.g. the Manosphere) and start booting out the original members that made it good (they don’t but it looks that way cos we leave). If this sounds familiar, it’s the SJW tactic that ruined Geek Culture.

Mainstream is fine. These people are cancer.

So they come up to people like me and try to outgroup me. Like Oh, it’s a shame the Alt Right has women, we don’t hate women but let’s all move to a homoerotic island for Male Supremacy.

“Let’s you and him fight” – this is the abuse tactic called triangulation.
Characteristic of gaslighters and rabbits, but I repeat myself.
Divide and conquer, like this is new? Like they invented this??

How stupid do they think we are?

Real men want a good wife and good children. They oppose anything that stands in the way of that ambition, the only real ambition if you remove contemporary culture selling you on the SATC ‘dream’ of materialism and sex blogging. They don’t get much joy out of bitching on a sausage-fest forum and crying into their hentai porn screen with the futility of someone who doesn’t deserve their fertility.

They burned down the manosphere and other associated groups and now they’re trying to do it with us.

It won’t work because we’re basing our material on reality and have smarter people naturally but if we don’t pay attention soon, removing the sin equivalent of kebab won’t be as easy. Our MSM rep will suffer. ‘Member that Vox Day (OK on other topics) claims to know what white people need to do better than we know ourselves. Why are we allowing the mystery meat to lecture us? Someone please explain the reasoning here. Isn’t this the problem in the first place, taking tips from the outgroup that hate us?

Misogyny, which does exist on the internet (as well as misandry, can’t have one without t’uther), rots any ideology that seeks to create a healthy society because men and women need each other and that’s nothing to be ashamed of. It isn’t bitchy/faggy/weak to want to breed and raise your spawn. Anyone who tries to shame you for the biological imperative to settle down and have a family is brainwashed. Essentially, if they say the nuclear family is good, they’re also claiming you’re not good enough to reproduce. Mellow on that thought.

The manosphere is the male equivalent of Carrie Bradshaw. If you find a good woman, you don’t need books on Text Games and Juicing Recipes. If you have kids, you don’t have time to give traffic views to their clickbait. You have unplugged from their system. The PUA scam relies on you being Forever Alone. Like its proponents.

If people want to let their genetics die with them, I think they should be encouraged.

These entryists burned down the manosphere with bitchy sweeping statements about all women. Sure, sure, NAWALT. But it’s true. It’s like when the feminists go on about men being rapists. It’s true that sweeping statements have no basis in reality. You’re being sexist. You are not judging the person based on their actions, but their sex, and making exemptions (a fallacy) based on a special sex. Just because you spend all your time in clubs surrounded by the worst quality people (birds of a feather) doesn’t make women in the same city like that. There’s an egregious problem with Americans projecting and trying to World Police the sexuality of the world (non-America).

You are Sodom. Sort yourself out.
You are the hub of degeneracy. No pity party for you. No limp-dick standing around Won’t Someone Do Something? You’re the Alpha Males, that means it’s your fault. Responsibility is an alien concept to r-types, even the somewhat self-aware ones for sexual manipulation (rape) purposes.

Magical White Man isn’t going to ride in and save you. You are not the victim, you are the criminal. You caused this mess. You are not Princess Peach in need of rescue from the meanies. Don’t try to Snowflake while throwing up bravado. It doesn’t work. It fools nobody. Hypoagency is a feminist lie. Men have as much self control as women. You are possibly more responsible if you believe in ‘Men should lead’ theories. Since leaders bear the brunt, logically.

Society doesn’t improve because men won’t improve.

That doesn’t mean notch counts, this isn’t Pacman.

The West won’t save itself because the men are expecting women to rescue them.

It’s simple.

Don’t be degenerate. If you ‘can’t’ do this, why do you expect your kind to do it too?

Unless you don’t expect change, which makes you a vacuous, signalling liar.

Impotent or deceptive, it can only be one.
Either way, we don’t want you. The problem is not with us.

^HINT.
After this, most obvious of signs, flashy neon, they still won’t get it.

Sure, these people masterminded the whole meme thing, right, Alt Right?

[1]  Really I should trash-compact my points less. I know.

And being nice gets you nothing. That’s called the First World standard. It’s the minimum. You aren’t special for being polite to women because women are people, the same way women aren’t entitled to a drink because they smiled at a guy.

A puppy is nice.

Nobody wants to fuck a puppy.

Have the standards for husband slipped so low?

The self-aware r-types try to win women from both sides by signalling K. Run away. They’re crazy. Leave them to the cokeheads and sluts. Let the genetic suicides get on with it and burn out their pleasure circuits. Yes, that’s what (player) burnout is.