Superstitious minds

Mini post. Kinda. Why is Benedict Cumberbatch so ugly?

No really. If we’re doing red pill observations, humour me.


I mentioned before about old world superstitions forgotten in recent years.
As recently as my parent’s generation, they considered ugly children the product of sin, that God was punishing their parents for their sin. You can still find this info around if you look but they rarely dive into it.

You could say it’s about STDs but back then people rarely travelled and slept around enough to frequently catch them. The modern microbiome of the slut is more taxed. So what?

Back to the school mocking. If a child had always married parents but became ugly in the teens, questions would be asked openly and they would get teased about whether one or both parents had ever cheated. This is where we get the term bastard. It isn’t actually about bastards, it’s about ugliness. The ugliness of parental deceit.

You can pretty much tell when there’s a birth defect in a baby, the eyes look dull if it’s mental. It’s a known indicator of fatal defects.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875957214001703

2015 Birth Defects in the Newborn Population: Race and Ethnicity

Overall birth defect prevalence was 29.2 per 1000 in a cohort of 1,048,252 live births, of which 51% were Caucasians.

Full white or mongrelised? Let’s assume pureblood despite America (mixed white, mostly). American whites are on average less attractive as white blended than single nation counterparts, even living in America. Models tend to come from homogeneous national areas, (i.e. subrace) a finding that is known to apply to white settlers in Brazil to this day, they send scouts. Specifically.

https://www.thecut.com/2010/06/model_scouts_find_more_than_ha.html

Compared with Caucasians, the risk of overall birth defects was lower in African–Americans (relative risk = 0.9, confidence interval 0.8–0.9) and Hispanics (relative risk = 0.9, confidence interval 0.8–0.9).

Failure to consider abortions for “no” reason or gender as defective. Selection bias. A lot of those already had abortions because they’re high abortion groups!

The risk of overall birth defects was similar in Caucasians and Asians. Relative to the Caucasians, African–Americans had a lower risk of cardiac, genitourinary, and craniofacial malformations but a higher risk of musculoskeletal malformations. Hispanics had a lower risk of genitourinary and gastrointestinal malformation. Asians had a higher risk of craniofacial and musculoskeletal malformations.

Didn’t control for proportion in the population, then non-whites are way ahead.

Craniofacial = ugly. 

Musculoskeletal = ugly. Well, dumpy.

Unless you’re going to argue a big is beautiful for literal birth defects?

And “similar” isn’t same. It isn’t statistical. This is like IVF success studies again (see below).

Why did some old world men witness the birth? All babies look like those reddish potatoes, it can’t be a resemblance. You can tell a resemblance to one parent over another by middle childhood to puberty.
We’re told that it’s about adultery and it might be true if you suspect a man with certain features e.g. skin colour, an extra finger.

Yet, what can you tell at birth? Ugliness.
Whether or not the man in question remembers that reason.

Cinderella effect also applies to genetic but ugly kids (lookism, it’s aka). The parents reject them, even if one genetically caused their fug.

Take Cumberbatch, product of a union involving adultery.
Fugly. Nice voice, but his father is the looker. Mother is a looker too. The issue cannot be genetic.

Some superstitions have a basis in fact.

Why did old ladies peer into a pram to judge the ugliness of the babe?

To see if you’re a SINNER!

[inc Thou shalt not adulterate]

Picking on an ugly white guy wouldn’t be totally kosher. I have other evidence.

We’re looking for spiteful mutants.

Now the post gets huge.

To more data, ever more data, smother the liars in data:

https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/informationregardingmixedraceparentage

“Please may I request the following information, records and documentation under the Freedom of Information Act:

Information in regard to people of mixed race parentage- often called ‘white and black Caribbean’, ‘white and black African’, ‘white and Asian’, ‘other mixed’- being at increased risk of being born with a birth defect, stillborn, or of suffering from fertility problems in their adult lives, which is related to their mixed race parentage

Information regarding NHS policy and practice on the advising of interracial couples, who are prospective parents, about the increased risk of their child being born with a birth defect, stillborn, or infertile in adult life, which would be connected to their, the child’s, mixed race parentage

Please may I also request statistical information and records which display the following:

The percentage of overall cases of babies born with a birth defect, which is attributable to each ethnic group

The percentage of overall cases of babies still born, which is attributable to each ethnic group

The percentage of overall cases of infertility, which is attributable to each ethnic group

The percentage of overall births, which is attributable to each ethnic group”

Reply:

“In Tables 8 and 10, mixed race is included in a single category of Mixed, Chinese and any other ethnic group. This is because the numbers in these groups are sufficiently low to risk being disclosive, and follows agreed statistical guidelines.
a) being born with a birth defect – this information is shown in Table 10.
b) being still born – this information is not published. However, you could request a special extract (further details of how to do this are explained below).
c) we do not hold any information on infertility, and are therefore not able to answer your question about adults suffering from fertility problems, connected to their mixed race parentage.”

Do not hold information my lily-white arse.

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/infertility-ivf-nhs-race-lgbt-asian-black-women-a9216921.html

Table link: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/bulletins/gestationspecificinfantmortality/2014-10-15

“Page does not exist”.

It’s this paper.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/bulletins/pregnancyandethnicfactorsinfluencingbirthsandinfantmortality/2014-10-15

“Some research suggests that Black and Asian women have shorter gestation than White European women, and that this may be due to earlier fetal maturation (Patel et al., 2004). The discrepancies in gestation by ethnicity may also be explained by socio-economic, behavioural and physiological differences among the different ethnic groups (Gray et al., 2009).”

In an ONS report. They know.

“Table 10 (184.5 Kb Excel sheet) shows that for four of the five combined ethnic groups analysed, the most common cause of infant death was immaturity related conditions

(Black, 54%;

Mixed, Chinese and any other group, 44%;

White, 43%;

For a majority, that’s incredibly low.

and those where ethnicity was

not stated, 49%).

For the Asian group, the most common cause was congenital anomalies (41%). A higher incidence of congenital anomalies in Asian populations is well-documented (Gray et al. 2009).”

http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/child-health/gestation-specific-infant-mortality-in-england-and-wales/2012/rft-table-1.xls

Low birthweight and prematurity are both measures of fetal development. Another measure is the baby’s size in relation to its gestational age. Babies whose birthweight lies below the tenth percentile for their gestational age are known as ‘small for gestational age’ (SGA).

Not all babies who are SGA have a pathological growth restriction; they may just be constitutionally small.

read: racially

This may explain why babies of Bangladeshi, Indian or Pakistani origin are more likely to be SGA than White British babies.”

Smaller brains too. Inbreeding depression but also group average by nation. Look at national IQ.

https://www.photius.com/rankings/national_iq_scores_country_ranks.html
Bangladesh 82
Over one whole standard deviation below. According to the likes of Peterson, useless to a Western economy. The average Bangladeshi.
India 82
Recall regression to the mean. Also, friendliness correlates more to low IQ. Do not be fooled.
Pakistan 84
Thailand 91
Philippines 86
Nigeria 84
Jamaica 71, where we’re picking up new NHS nurses.

Enjoy that decline.

Tables 8 and 10 mentioned in FOI request not listed, have to know it’s there.
Under Downloadable Tables:

“Table 8: Live births, neonatal and infant mortality by ethnic group and gestational age at birth, 2012 birth cohort, England and Wales

Table 10: Infant mortality by ONS cause groups and broad ethnic group, 2012 birth cohort, England and Wales”

For future reference, write your FOI requests as “concern for services provided to BAME women” and “progressive need for up-to-date medical guidance for mixed race couples and the biracial in family planning”.

You have to download the excel, click to tables 8 and 10, then read the footnote of superscript 1 to know to scroll right.

Table 8: All others^1
7.1% under 37wks
9.2% SGA

Black SGA: 9.2 and 12.3%.
Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani only SGA: 17%, 16.3%, 14.2%.
White SGA: 7.2%, 6.2%.
Unknown 8.2%.
ALL SGA average: 8.2%.

Something’s off.

Pre-term neonatal deaths
Total: 869
B,I,P: 9, 30, 47
Black: 39, 13
White: 549, 63
Unknown, not stated: 32
All others^1: 87
For such a vanishingly small percentage of the population, how is it 87?
10% of pre-term deaths were “1 Chinese, Other Asian, Other black, Other and all Mixed groups.”

Do you see what I see?

For non-statistically minded people:

Infant death, pre-term
Total: 1232
B 21
I 41
P 66
Black African: 62
Black Caribbean: 20
W native 750
W other 86
Not stated 48
All others^1: 138

See it yet? If you controlled for population ratio, it’d be more dramatic by far.

This is why they hide it and I have to make my own charts.

Term infant deaths
Total: 895
All others^1: 102.
That’s 11.4% from a tiny group of mixed.

Table 10 screen-capped, do your own charts.

Related studies, I do have a point about measurement error.

https://iussp2009.princeton.edu/papers/93139
2009 Fertility by ethnic and religious groups in the UK, trends in a multi-cultural context

Asian tsunami in USA too
https://www.statista.com/statistics/226292/us-fertility-rates-by-race-and-ethnicity/

https://www.statista.com/statistics/281416/birth-rate-in-the-united-kingdom-uk/

From one of the links, can’t find which. Calm down. Either they’re abstaining from having kids once here, infertile, the neonate dies or it’s retarded. Being here is actually a curse since they’re held to the standards and economy of a higher IQ nation. They’re voter birds here for a season or tax chattel and they’ll leave when it’s convenient to.

Ethnicity and IVF

“How a patient’s ethnic background affects her chance of pregnancy, especially with IVF, is a fascinating yet poorly studied area of research. According to a 1995 national survey of family growth, non-Caucasian married women were more likely to experience infertility than Caucasian married women, yet these same non-Caucasian women were less likely to receive any type of infertility treatment—especially treatment with assisted reproductive technologies.

There is very little data in the literature examining ethnicity and its affect upon pregnancy rates with in vitro fertilization (IVF). Ethnic minorities compose a small percentage of patients in the nation’s IVF programs, making it relatively difficult to examine how they respond to various infertility treatments. In the few studies that have examined the affect of ethnicity on IVF pregnancy rates, differing outcomes have been found.

There have been only a few studies specifically comparing IVF success rates between African Americans and Caucasians. The results of two of these studies contradict each other, with one showing that African Americans had decreased pregnancy rates with IVF as compared to Caucasians, and the other finding no difference in pregnancy outcomes with IVF between these two ethnic groups.

Likewise, there are only a few studies directly comparing IVF pregnancy outcomes between Indians and Caucasians. One shows a trend towards decreased pregnancy rates in Indian women and finds that Indian women were significantly more likely to have their cycle cancelled as compared to Caucasian women. In comparison, another study found no significant difference in IVF pregnancy rates between Indians and Caucasians. A more recent study has shown that Asian ethnicity was an independent predictor of poor outcome with IVF. There have been no studies examining IVF pregnancy outcomes in Hispanics in comparison to any other ethnic groups.

We’ll see why.

When I was in training, I published the first study comparing IVF outcomes among multiple ethnic groups. It was a retrospective study utilizing a data set that was the result of the collaboration between three IVF centers in the Boston area: Boston IVF, Brigham and Women’s Hospital IVF Center, and Reproductive Science Center.
We retrospectively reviewed the cycles of 1,135 women undergoing IVF between 1994 and 1998. Only the first IVF cycle for each couple was reviewed. Ethnicity was self-reported. Women who categorized themselves as having a mixed ethnic background were excluded.

Seriously. Measurement bias much?

….In order to better understand how ethnicity affects IVF outcome, it will be necessary to study a larger number of minority patients. In these studies, it is important that all ethnicities be included. If racial differences do exist, IVF treatment protocols could be adjusted to improve the success rates for patients of all ethnic backgrounds. Therefore, further exploration in this area is necessary and very important.”

We did that.

https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/news/bjog-release/

“After adjusting for certain factors including the age of the patient at time of treatment, cause of female or male infertility, and type of treatment (ICSI vs IVF), the study found that White Irish, South Asian Indian, South Asian Bangladeshi, South Asian Pakistani, Black African, and Other Asian women had a significantly lower odds of a live birth than White British women. For example, the live birth rate for White British women was 26.4% compared to 17.2% for White Irish women and 17.4% for Black African women.

The study also found that some groups of women including South Asian Bangladeshi, Black African, Middle Eastern, have a significantly lower number of eggs collected than White British women.

Moreover, South Asian Indian, South Asian Bangladeshi, South Asian Pakistani, Black British, Black African, Black Caribbean and Middle Eastern women were at a higher risk of not reaching the embryo transfer stage.

The paper explores the possible reasons behind the variation and states that while genetic background could be a potential determinant of egg and sperm quality, variation in environmental exposures relating to lifestyle, dietary factors, socio-economic and cultural factors could be influencing egg and sperm quality, accessibility of fertility treatment and behaviour towards seeking medical care and consequently reproductive outcomes.

No, they were living in the same place. Muh Magic Dirt.

Genetics is the ONLY difference now.

You have NOTHING.

DNA causes germline DNA, really? Maybe?

Furthermore, the increased prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in South Asian women may have an impact on egg quality and lower implantation rates.

Shit tier WHR tipped us off on that one, see end.

Dr Kanna Jayaprakasan, Consultant subspecialist in Reproductive Medicine, Derby Fertility Unit, Royal Derby Hospital; Honorary Associate Professor in Gynaecology, University of Nottingham and senior author of the paper, said:

“The data suggests that ethnicity is a major independent factor determining the chances of IVF or ICSI treatment success.

“While the reason for this association is difficult to explain, the potential factors could be the observed differences in cause of infertility, ovarian response, fertilisation rates and implantation rates, which are all independent predictors of IVF success.

“The main strengths of the study are the use of the UK HFEA national database which includes a large number of women treated in all UK units. However, the numbers in some of the sub-ethnic minorities, such as Bangladeshi women, were low in the study.”

Professor Adam Balen, spokesperson for the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) and Chair of the British Fertility Society (BFS) said:

“Infertility affects 10-15% of the population and more people are seeking fertility treatment.

“This interesting study looking at maternal ethnicity provides useful data based on a large number of women undergoing fertility treatment. The reasons behind the variation need to be looked at in more detail but in the future could potentially help improve success rates amongst all groups of women.”

Nope!

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1472648315002564

“Black and South Asian women were found to have lower live birth rates compared with White women”
“Black and South Asian women seem to have the poorest outcome, which is not explained by the commonly known confounders. Future research needs to investigate the possible explanations for this difference and improve IVF outcome for all women.”

Almost like Anglo women evolved to breed in the Anglo climate?

The Ice Age killed the boyish ones.

MORE:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2636517/

“Variation in risk factors and outcomes was found in infants of White mothers by paternal race/ethnicity.”

I wonder which way.
Inbreeding or outbreeding depression?

Guess.

“Status exchange hypothesizes that in a marriage market framework, minority men marry less-desired White women (e.g., of lower education) in exchange for higher social status. The second hypothesis, in-group preference, simply suggests that people prefer members from their own group, and thus, intermarriage is the less desirable scenario.”

Dudebros like “where’s da studies?”

I’m like “Have you even looked?”

“Together they found that mixed-race couples differed significantly with respect to their sociodemographic characteristics from the endogamous couples. After control for those variables, biracial infants were found to have worse birth outcomes than infants with 2 White parents but better than infants with 2 Black parents.6,8–12 (Henceforth, infant’s race/ethnicity will be referred to by the notation “maternal race/ethnicity–paternal race/ethnicity” [e.g., White–Black].)”

DING DING DING DING DING

TIL Wombs iz white supremacist.

“Consistent with Table 1, infants in the White–unreported group had the worst birth outcomes in each category.”

Trans. mixed. Likely Asian since S. America and Black are already covered.

Learn to read, weebs.

“In general, I found substantial variation in birth outcomes within the group of infants with White mothers and fathers of different racial/ethnic groups. This is interesting because it shows that the common practice of using maternal race/ethnicity to refer to the infant’s race/ethnicity, regardless of father’s race/ethnicity, can be problematic.

aka nice way of calling out deception

For example, it is not uncommon for a study to refer to infants of White mothers as “White infants,” even though “White infants” may imply that the fathers are White. In this study, I demonstrated that infants of a White mother and a White father, the real “White infants,” have the better birth outcomes than do those infants of a White mother and a non-White father. Therefore, the practice of using “White mother” to refer to White infants will yield lower estimation of the birth outcomes because there are infants of non-White fathers in the sample.”

They know. It’s a cover-up.

Category errors galore.

“The infants in the White–White group had the most-advantaged birth outcomes, followed by infants in the 3 Hispanic-father groups. Infants in the White–Black group had the second-most-disadvantaged birth outcomes; the differences in birth outcomes between White–Black and White–White infants were statistically significant: White–White infants had a 2% (70 g) higher average birthweight, 26% lower LBW rate (4.64% vs 6.26%), and 39% lower infant mortality rate (0.43% vs 0.71%) than did White–Black infants. Infants in the White–unknown group had the most-disadvantaged outcomes in each category. These heterogeneities within White mothers show that the common practice of using maternal race/ethnicity to refer to the race/ethnicity of the infant is problematic: White–White infants had the best birth outcomes among the groups studied, so any other paternal race/ethnicity pulls down the averages for all White mothers. That is, the birth outcomes of White–White infants are actually underestimated by researchers who use mothers’ race/ethnicity to refer to infants’ race/ethnicity, and thus, the racial/ethnic disparities between White and any other race/ethnicity may be underestimated accordingly as well.”

Relevant!

“…Clearly, the unreported father is a proxy for more-noteworthy factors, because if unreported fathers were merely missing from certificates, their infants’ outcomes should not be so much worse.”

What DO these studies have in common? [Asians]

Could also be child of rape as a confound.

You’ll see.

2012 Biracial couples and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22776059

“Biracial status of parents was associated with higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes than both White parents but lower than both Black parents, with maternal race having a greater influence than paternal race on pregnancy outcomes.”

Evolution is racist or instincts evolved for reasons? Pick ONE.

Your Third World surrogate plan may need retouching.

If it fails or dies or gets retarded, you still gotta pay up! What are the odds?

Why is it so hard to find studies about the most populous race on the planet?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31238617

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30564431
2018
What is associated with IQ and other development issues? Pre-term birth.

“Maternal age, education level, race and ethnicity, smoking during pregnancy, and parity were significant risk factors associated with PTB.”

It’s mentioned along with smoking.

“…The analysis of interactions between maternal characteristics and perinatal health behaviors showed that Asian women have the highest prevalence of PTB in the youngest age group (< 20 years; AOR, 1.40; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.28-1.54).”

I want more studies about them. I’m not scared of reality.

That suggests a genetic predisposition to be present so young. I’d compare PTB to WHR, personally.

“Pacific Islander, American Indian, and African American women ≥40 years of age had a greater than two-fold increase in the prevalence of PTB compared with women in the 20-24 year age group.”

Their own women.

Pre-term study and IQ:

https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/136/3/415
“RESULTS: Across all assessments, VP/VLBW individuals had significantly lower IQ scores than term-born controls, even when individuals with severe cognitive impairment (n = 69) were excluded. IQ scores were found to be more stable over time for VP/VLBW than term-born individuals, yet differences in stability disappeared when individuals with cognitive impairment were excluded. Adult IQ could be predicted with fair certainty (r > 0.50) from age 20 months onward for the whole VP/VLBW sample (n = 260) and from 6 years onward for term-born individuals (n = 229).

CONCLUSIONS: VP/VLBW individuals more often suffer from cognitive problems across childhood into adulthood and these problems are relatively stable from early childhood onward. VP/VLBW children’s risk for cognitive problems can be reliably diagnosed at the age of 20 months. These findings provide strong support for the timing of cognitive follow-up at age 2 years to plan special support services for children with cognitive problems.”

So it doesn’t cause but it is associated. Humans evolved long gestation for the brain.

Clear defect evidence in the genes- study it!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29903290

But surely, you say, genetic issues would be also hormonal (hormones regulate genes as well) and apply to men?
Well…
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31348744
Yes. Yes it would.

“A total of 9079 patients were reviewed, of which 3956 patients had complete data. Of these, 839 (21.2%) were azoospermic. After adjusting for age, African-Canadians (odds ratio [OR] 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-2.25) and Asians (1.34; 95% CI 1.11-1.62) were more likely to be azoospermic compared to Caucasians.”

Some of us form opinions AFTER reading.
White men are literally more fertile and most fertile with white women.

“Similarly, African Canadians (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.33-2.29) were more likely to be oligospermic and Asians (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.70-0.97) less likely to be oligospermic. Low volume was found in African-Canadian (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.05-1.91), Asians (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.01-1.51), and Indo-Canadians (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.01-2.13). Furthermore, Asians (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.57-0.93) and Hispanics (OR 0.58; 95% CI 034-0.99) were less likely to have asthenospermia. Asians (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.57-0.94) and Indo-Canadians (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.35-0.99) were less likely to have teratozospermia. No differences were seen for vitality. No differences were seen for FSH levels, however, Asians (p<0.01) and Indo-Canadians (p<0.01) were more likely to have lower testosterone.”

It’s always the damn Asians.
Magic Dirt won’t fix your shitty sperm.

Maybe if we spend more on the NHS! The evolution fairy may visit!

The lower sexual dimorphism of Asians makes them functionally partially infertile. This is why they marry so young (it isn’t traditionalism) and despite this, have a low birth count per person, and are the most populous race on Earth. They’re actually the most r-selected, Mother Nature holds them back from fertilization with mutations. Along with r-selection, more total fertility issues in the male/offspring (azoospermia, infant death), lower volume AND lower testosterone, it all fits!

Is that my fault? No. Stop blaming me for reading. I’m not, in fact, God.

Hey, we have our own group with shitty sperm. Theirs is just bigger and more characteristic of the whole.

from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26962784

“AR-CAG repeat length was longer in infertile men in Asian, Caucasian, and mixed races (SMD = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08-0.43, P <0.01; SMD = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.25, P <0.05; SMD = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.15-0.63, P <0.01).

Notice p-value difference is so loose for white it doesn’t meet the medical standard? 0.05 is too high. Absurdly.

The overall study shows that increased AR-CAG repeat length was associated with male infertility. The subgroup study on races shows that increased AR-CAG repeat length was associated with male infertility in Asian, Caucasian, and mixed races. Increased AR-CAG repeat length was also associated with azoospermia. This meta-analysis supports that increased androgen receptor CAG length is capable of causing male infertility susceptibility.”

In the interest of intellectual honesty.

WHR

We literally have the studies. e.g. It’s metabolic.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4306982/

“Sixty-four PCOS patients and 40 women served as the control group were studied. The two groups were subdivided according to the body mass index (BMI) into two obese and non-obese groups. Waist:hip ratio (WHR), plasma epinephrine level was estimated, sympathetic skin response (SSR); postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, heart rate variability (HRV), and valsalva ratio were measured in both groups.”
“Compared to the control group, obese PCOS patients demonstrated higher BMI and WHR, reduced palmar SSR latency and higher amplitude, altered HRV, higher plasma epinephrine level, and rapid pulse rate. Moreover, non-obese patients show reduced palmar SSR latency and higher amplitude, higher plasma epinephrine level, and higher pulse rate. BMI and WHR of the patients were positively correlated with plasma epinephrine level; while the HRV was negatively correlated WHR.”
“The BMI and WHR were significantly higher in the PCOS patients compared to the control group 36.63±4.23 kg/m2 vs. 34.14±3.39 kg/m2 (p=0.041) and 0.88±0.05 compared to 0.79±0.11 (p=0.001), respectively.”

“We demonstrated high plasma epinephrine level during lying and standing positions in PCOS patients. This could be of obesogenic origin as we noticed a positive correlation between plasma epinephrine level and both of BMI and WHR. PCOS patients of this study exhibited central abdominal obesity and the mechanisms by which central obesity drive an increase in sympathetic activity are not entirely clear. Yet, the fat cells have increased sensitivity to lipolytic agents and/or the factors inducing fat mobilization are turned on (16). This was further supported that adipocytes isolated from the visceral fat depot of women with PCOS had increased catecholamine-stimulated lipolysis (17).”

Nice boy hips. Don’t try for kids. (Goes for all races, Spartans forced girls to be lightly athletic to be ready for childbirth as a woman, that broadens hips beyond racial average).
And when the NHS totally fails, picture the fatal correction to reality when these women expect childbirth interventions. No waist? No taste.

Old expression.

It’s genetic. They’re gonna get fat – or the kids will. We’ve all seen them. I’m just saying, the signs were there. Choosing a woman with a shit tier WHR is like electing for a manlet over the average height. It could rarely work out for health, but rarely. Don’t get angry at me.

https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/4755-4761-Metabolic-parameters-in-PCOS-and-abdominal-obesity.pdf

“RESULTS: Women with WHR ≥0.8 had higher concentration of glucose and insulin (both fasting and after 120 min of oral administration of 75 g glucose), as well as HOMA-IR value, than women with WHR value < 0.8. Also, abdominal obesity disorders hormonal parameters. Higher free androgen index and lower concentration of sex hormone binding globulin and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate were found in female with WHR ≥ 0.8.

There’ll still be guys like “WHR doesn’t matter, medically”.

Muh dudebros going, “at least they’re skinny”. But they’re not?

“Women with WHR ≥0.8 had… abdominal obesity disorders hormonal parameters.”

They’re literally not. Chemically. You can biopsy the tissue and test it.

the fat cells have increased sensitivity to lipolytic agents and/or the factors inducing fat mobilization are turned on”

My feels have zero to do with that, dude. It’s genes?

NOBODY is jealous. You keep your secret fatty.

I implore you to marry the future whale and learn the hard way. They’re a puffer-fish.

Whatever their race. But the shorter they are, the worse it is. Short women should have an even SMALLER waist, since it’s skeletal. My own is far smaller than most Asians, for instance, despite being taller than most of them as white. If you want to piss them off, say (honestly) that men like small waists. Just generally. Gets them every time, although most people wouldn’t say they had a large one (not really looking and they don’t dress for it). They know they’re broad and they hate women who dress to show any different, including lucky exceptions in their own race, since it’s a countersignal. Namely: I can afford to have a smaller midsection, less running and foraging is required.

[If I want to dress to piss off a group of women, bodycon but for the waist only. It’s subtle and you’d imagine as a man they would neither notice nor care. Great way to tell a woman’s natural WHR – do they like bodycon? It needn’t be tight on T&A, actually that’s better, it’s actually about waist fit. Pill women also get larger round the middle, any weight gain is there and ruins WHR so it’s visual slut shaming too. Love it.]

Follicular stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, androstenedione, and 17-beta-estradiol, were on similar level in both groups. Elevation in triglycerides, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein levels, as well as decrease in high density lipoprotein level in serum of women with WHR value ≥0.8, were found when compared to women with WHR < 0.8. A statistically significant correlation was found between WHR value and glucose, insulin, sex hormone binding globulin, free androgen index and lipid profile parameters.”

Hips don’t lie because biochemistry.

“CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal obesity causes additional disorders in metabolic and hormonal parameters in PCOS women, which confirmed changes in analyzed parameters between PCOS women with WHR < 0.8 and WHR ≥ 0.8 and statistically significant correlations between WHR value and analyzed parameters.”

Monoculture Bible quotes

God separated peoples for their own good. That was his Will?

Do-gooders play God with the hubris and pathological altruism.

I’m not going through and finding them all.

https://www.biblehub.com/bsb/isaiah/65.htm
“21They will build houses and dwell in them; they will plant vineyards and eat their fruit. 22No longer will they build houses for others to inhabit, nor plant for others to eat. For as is the lifetime of a tree, so will be the days of My people, and My chosen ones will fully enjoy the work of their hands. 23They will not labor in vain or bear children doomed to disaster; for they will be a people blessed by the LORD—they and their descendants with them”

THEIR descendants.

Their OWN descendants.

Those doubting the intent:
“Unlike the past, invaders will not take their houses and confiscate their vineyards. For my people will live as long as trees, and my chosen ones will have time to enjoy their hard-won gains.” in another translation

“if you reject My statutes, despise My ordinances, and neglect to carry out all My commandments, and so break My covenant, 16then this is what I will do to you:

I will bring upon you sudden terror, wasting disease, and fever that will destroy your sight and drain your life. You will sow your seed in vain, because your enemies will eat it. 17And I will set My face against you, so that you will be defeated by your enemies. Those who hate you will rule over you, and you will flee when no one pursues you”
https://www.biblehub.com/leviticus/26-16.htm

The people adulterating their bloodline are in for a shock.

“The LORD will strike you with wasting disease, with fever and inflammation, with severe heat and drought, and with blight and mildew; these will pursue you until you perish.”
https://www.biblehub.com/deuteronomy/28-22.htm

The fake Christians don’t read the actual book.

If your priest says one thing and the book another, the ‘priest’ is wrong.

Political phobias don’t exist, it’s gaslighting.

https://www.biblehub.com/psalms/78.htm
“23Yet He commanded the clouds above

and opened the doors of the heavens.

24He rained down manna for them to eat;

He gave them grain from heaven.

25Man ate the bread of angels;

He sent them food in abundance.

26He stirred the east wind from the heavens

and drove the south wind by His might.

27He rained meat on them like dust,

and winged birds like the sand of the sea.

28He felled them in the midst of their camp,

all around their dwellings.

29So they ate and were well filled,

for He gave them what they craved.

30Yet before they had filled their desire,

with the food still in their mouths,

31God’s anger flared against them,

and He put to death their strongest

and subdued the young men of Israel.”

 

Why do atheists and CHINOs think Christianity is some bland, blanket pro-male thing?

He’s harder on sinning men. Greater power (head of a single household) comes greater responsibility (more rules, personally).

 

“32In spite of all this, they kept on sinning;

despite His wonderful works, they did not believe.

33So He ended their days in futility,

and their years in sudden terror.

34When He slew them, they would seek Him;

they repented and searched for God.

35And they remembered that God was their Rock,

that God Most High was their Redeemer.

36But they deceived Him with their mouths,

and lied to Him with their tongues.

37Their hearts were disloyal to Him,

and they were unfaithful to His covenant.”

 

The worst type of Satanist is a fake Christian. Deathbed conversion types still go to Hell.

You can’t trick a deity. Only they would be dumb enough to think they could.

 

“38Yet He was compassionate;

He forgave their iniquity and did not destroy them.

He often restrained His anger

and did not unleash His full wrath.

39He remembered that they were but flesh,

a passing breeze that does not return.

40How often they disobeyed Him in the wilderness

and grieved Him in the desert!

41Again and again they tested God

and provoked the Holy One of Israel.

42They did not remember His power —

the day He redeemed them from the adversary,

43when He performed His signs in Egypt

and His wonders in the fields of Zoan.”

 

Christianity isn’t a convenient thing you can pick up like a diet or for politics when the wages of sin are due.

This respite of time to actually repent and ‘sin no more’ (the condition) is a grace period, literally, because if ignored, the punishment gets worse when it comes.

 

“44He turned their rivers to blood,

and from their streams they could not drink.”

The Thames?

“45He sent swarms of flies that devoured them,

and frogs that devastated them.”

That one is funny.

“46He gave their crops to the grasshopper,

the fruit of their labor to the locust.

47He killed their vines with hailstones

and their sycamore-figs with sleet.

48He abandoned their cattle to the hail

and their livestock to bolts of lightning.”

 

Wow, that’s kinda starting to happen now. On a huge scale. Was this describing a climate shift? GSM?

 

“49He unleashed His fury against them,

wrath, indignation, and calamity—

a band of destroying angels.”

 

only dumb middle-aged hippies want to meet an angel, they’re metal

 

“50He cleared a path for His anger;

He did not spare them from death

but delivered their lives to the plague.

51He struck all the firstborn of Egypt,

the virility in the tents of Ham.”

 

The people complaining about aged male fertility are funny like… I thought you said the Lord would provide? Maybe having kids right now would cause them to starve later?

 

“52He led out His people like sheep

and guided them like a flock in the wilderness.

53He led them safely, so they did not fear,

but the sea engulfed their enemies.

54He brought them to His holy land,

to the hill country His right hand had acquired.

55He drove out nations before them

and apportioned their inheritance;”

 

Is it colonialism if God did it? I say no.

 

“He settled the tribes of Israel in their tents.

56But they tested and disobeyed God Most High,

for they did not keep His decrees.

57They turned back and were faithless like their fathers,

twisted like a faulty bow.”

 

Why are men like this? Was Adam this much of a shithead? There are TEN major rules. Ten! You can’t even do that right!

 

“58They enraged Him with their high places

and provoked His jealousy with their idols.

59On hearing it, God was furious

and rejected Israel completely.

60He abandoned the tabernacle of Shiloh,

the tent He had pitched among men.

61He delivered His strength to captivity,

and His splendor to the hand of the adversary.

62He surrendered His people to the sword

because He was enraged by His heritage.”

 

Stop f-ing it up.

 

“63Fire consumed His young men,

and their maidens were left without wedding songs.”

I’d rather be a woman in that scenario. Note that the women were spared because they weren’t sinning by setting the wrong tone of society as the moral authority. In Christianity, men are bound by the higher standards. It’s right there.

 

“64His priests fell by the sword,

but His widows could not lament.”

 

Which book are they reading?

Fake priests are going to be an interesting case study.

https://www.biblehub.com/1_kings/8-37.htm

 

https://www.biblehub.com/job/31-8.htm

“6let God weigh me with honest scales,

and He will know my integrity.

7If my steps have turned from the path,

if my heart has followed my eyes,

or impurity has stuck to my hands,

8then may another eat what I have sown,

and may my crops be uprooted.

9If my heart has been enticed by my neighbor’s wife,

or I have lurked at his door,

10then may my own wife grind grain for another,

and may other men sleep with her.”

 

Being a creep is illegal, by God’s law. Lechery is a sin. These degenerate men slagging off the women of the same cloth are really mental. All they do is follow their eyes, usually overseas. Pluck ’em out then, if yoga pants offend your Amish sensibilities. Women have to make a mental effort not to ogle the topless billboard men constantly, learn the skill!

The Bible literally says the desire to cuck your wife will lead to her cucking you. Cmon.

Later:
“24If I have put my trust in gold

or called pure gold my security,

25if I have rejoiced in my great wealth

because my hand had gained so much,

26if I have regarded the sun in its radiance

or the moon moving in splendor,

27so that my heart was secretly enticed

and my hand threw a kiss from my mouth,

28this would also be an iniquity to be judged,

for I would have denied God on high.

29If I have rejoiced in my enemy’s ruin,

or exulted when evil befell him—

30I have not allowed my mouth to sin

by asking for his life with a curse—

31if the men of my house have not said,

‘Who is there who has not had his fill?’—

32but no stranger had to lodge on the street,

for my door has been open to the traveler—”

note: not settler, the passing-through

“33if I have covered my transgressions like Adam

by hiding my guilt in my heart,

34because I greatly feared the crowds,

and the contempt of the clans terrified me,

so that I kept silent

and would not go outside—”

crowded cities, huh?

“38if my land cries out against me

and its furrows weep together,

39if I have devoured its produce without payment

or broken the spirit of its tenants,

40then let briers grow instead of wheat

and stinkweed instead of barley.””

Briefly:

https://www.biblehub.com/isaiah/65-22.htm
“They shall not build and another inhabit; they shall not plant and another eat; for like the days of a tree shall the days of my people be, and my chosen shall long enjoy the work of their hands”

https://biblehub.com/isaiah/5-8.htm
“Woe to you who add house to house and join field to field till no space is left and you live alone in the land.”

he will dwell in ruined cities, in abandoned houses destined to crumble.
https://biblehub.com/job/15-28.htm

“Woe to him who builds his palace by unrighteousness, and his upper rooms without justice, who makes his countrymen serve without pay, and will not give him his wages,
https://biblehub.com/jeremiah/22-13.htm

 

It’s ironic a book for the Middle East talks about guest right and breaking no law.
Rescue the victim of robbery from the hand of his oppressor. Do no wrong or violence to the foreigner, the fatherless, or the widow. Do not shed innocent blood in this place.”

“17“But your eyes and heart are set on nothing

except your own dishonest gain,

on shedding innocent blood,

on practicing extortion and oppression.””

Jer 22, btw

 

“21I warned you when you were secure.

You said, ‘I will not listen.’

This has been your way from youth,

that you have not obeyed My voice.

22The wind will drive away all your shepherds,

and your lovers will go into captivity.

Then you will be ashamed and humiliated

because of all your wickedness.

Why are he and his descendants hurled out

and cast into a land they do not know?

29O land, land, land,

hear the word of the LORD!

30This is what the LORD says:

“Enroll this man as childless,

a man who will not prosper in his lifetime.

None of his descendants will prosper

to sit on the throne of David

or to rule again in Judah.”

MGTOWs are anti-God if they’re still fornicating. It’s right there.

Remember, the people are the culture:

Psalm 127:
“If the Lord does not build the house, the work of the builders is useless; if the Lord does not protect the city, it does no good for the sentries to stand guard.”

If you make excuses for the manwhores, we’re all ruined. It specifically applies the harshest standards on the men time and time again.

A culture must be built up by its own people, not outsiders. Any citizens who ruin it with decadence and degeneracy, ruin it for everyone. Thy name is corruption.

A couple of these one could dismiss with prejudice but altogether it builds up to a picture.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/08/26/they-dont-quote-this-line-2/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/07/21/context/

Quite a picture.

Link: Now only warfare remains

https://affirmativeright.blogspot.com/2016/06/now-only-warfare-remains.html

people inevitably drift back into the usual narcissistic oblivion that turns great civilizations into degenerative stupidity. 

People with this spirit, when put in power, tend to beat back the foolishness and leave everyone else alone. This terrifies your average person, who wants to face no consequences for his own bad behavior, which is why he tends to select anti-leaders: people who herd the group together and make sure “we all get along” but at the horrific long-term cost of preventing the constant and united action necessary to improve society and stop it stagnating and crumbling.

If you don’t want to suffer for your own sin, you’re not really opposed to it.

We all pay the Piper eventually.

Only a child would think it best to avoid, stagnate, decay, putrify.

Delay makes it worse. And yes, a lot of us will suffer for parents, grandparents’ sins.

So what? It’s called adulthood.

Still, we’ll get the manchild Peter Pan types, male and female, who think they can keep a bubble life going like our economy. Virtue signallers who pay lip service to what is good (plenty of those claiming to be conservatives or traditional) while shrieking if you point out their debauchery – alcoholism, drug addiction, immodest gym selfies, blasphemy, fornication, disease-spreading, living in sin, race-mixing, emigrating etc. You can’t just talk. We’re seeing what happens to a nation of talkers – America.

Amorality – worship of the Self (better known as either nihilism or Satanism).

America wanted freedom – and this is what happens when stupidity isn’t shamed, when bad choices aren’t publicly condemned, when there are no standards and there is no moral authority.

If you want the Church out of your private life, fine, but don’t expect the churchgoers tax money to pay for your STD shots and the abortion of the woman you knocked up from Da Club. If you can’t afford 18y child support (like anyone can?), either use a toy, your hand, keep your legs shut (yes men, that is an option) or get a vasectomy. Last I checked, women can’t earn while pregnant/nursing.

Ghetto culture is dying culture. Pride, lust, avarice. These weaken men. You control your desires.

Remember that the next time you’re bitching about freedom to sin for others (but not you, snowflake).

We are now seeing the full face of such dissolution in the West, with birth rates in free-fall, people miserable in jobs and broken marriages, the average person as neurotic as a cat on meth, enemies both inside and outside our borders, record-breaking national debt, and industries that are paper tigers. Our elites — politicians, media, academia and other enfranchised “successful” people — are fiddling while Rome burns (or the tinder is at least soaked in kerosene).

Most of that’s economy and the dysgenic fruits of fornication. People are paying for kids – immigrant’s. White people are being cucked by non-white invaders. Women also have no incentive to breed in a dangerous multikult society, where deadbeats go unpunished and loyal women are frequently abandoned for a ‘younger model’. Where’s the reward? They think women like cleaning up baby puke? No, women don’t want to be a domestic slave or we’d become a cleaner nanny. Women want respect for domestic work and social appreciation. Women want security and on all fronts modern man is a failure at providing that – hence birth rate stabilizes.

If you want to respect marriage, limit re-marriage, punish adultery severely (m/f), make false light representations a thing in court cases (fraud is fraud) and make society safer – otherwise women naturally think “this isn’t safe enough” and wait like a hen that lays no eggs from stress.

There need to be qualifications to marry/breed, as well as disqualifiers. This won’t happen.

Instead, food shortage, shorter growing seasons, global die-off and rebuilding from a place of collapsed economic socialist promises. National IQ is important.

The good thing about this is that when multiple gangs are powerful, the Leftist grip on media and government will collapse. Like the gay mafia, Jewish nepotism, the old Anglo-Saxon order, and other special interest groups, Leftists specialize in promoting their own and excluding everyone else. No more: now multiple groups will be doing that, and by competing, they will keep the Leftists in check. They will probably also start taking their share of the excess wealth of the dying West. 

Don’t support your replacement, that’s all.

Don’t help people who hate you either. Self-hating White or not.

This means that well-funded, highly organized tribes based on some inherent identity — race, culture, sexual preference, political and religious leanings — will each be protecting their members from other groups. To keep the peace, there will at first be mutual tolerance as each group tries to minimize external warfare in order to bulk itself up so that it can be the biggest and win. Ultimately this one will be decided by biology: the average middle-class person in America, whose tribe will be the “Trump tribe” or whatever, follows it, and still has a chance at a balanced, sane life and normal family. When the generations change over, those are the ones who will be left standing.

K-types win in times of Malthusian trap. With great loss of life.

Instead, people will go entirely into their own realities. They will work in different offices, socialize with different people, live in different communities, watch and read different things, including on the internet, and have entirely different lifestyles. It used to be that civil rights laws allowed any group to do this except whites, but now, every group will demand that right, and it will increasingly radicalize them. 

Align with reality.

Note: it won’t bloat your ego. No “you go guys” anti-white woman propaganda prepared by fake online white guys, that’s the Zion of blue pill propaganda.

A white liberal and a white conservative will not recognize each other on the street. Their attire, speech, vocabulary, behavior, and activities will have entirely diverged. If a member of one tribe beats up on another, and it was not warranted (e.g. a personal matter), the gang will descend but now it will be total warfare in the way liberals already practice. People will be hounded out of jobs and homes, beaten up or killed on the street, and face punitive hacking and bullying. These groups will segregate quickly to avoid the risk of accidentally triggering a war. Territory will become more important than property value; what makes the property valuable is that it is in with your tribe.

In the endgame of multiculturalism (America’s melting pot dysgenics), the first to be targeted will be race mixing families – loyal to nobody, belong nowhere, tons of medical issues. They’ll even target one another – and nobody will come to their aid. They make easy targets with the weak father figures. The political allegiance of a white guy with a waifu is quite clearly not with other white people or their survival. Talk about painting a target. Usually the abuse switches from Tiger Mom to runner Mom as she flees ‘home’ with the meal tickets. The race mixing husbands aren’t usually the type who’d defend those alien-looking kids with their own life, whatever they claim.

https://affirmativeright.blogspot.com/2016/06/social-dysorganization-and-malthusian.html

Link: sexual freedom is the new mass religion

I get a kick out of reading pseudo-spiritual deep degenerate writing.

It’s like r/iamverysmart but for trying to make out like sin is difficult and moreover, makes you profound.

Every slut I ever met, I respected how philosophical they were.

https://www.clairenakti.com/articles/sexual-freedom-is-the-new-mass-religion
Orgies are characteristic of one religion’s worship.

The collective is an orgy of heathens. Whether or not they realize exactly what they worship.

Most orgies are of the serial “monogamy” variety, contrary to Hollywood.

The occult (hidden) is not magic (a practice) or black magic (an evil practice). It is not the left hand path (Satanism).
However, the left hand path can be found THROUGH there, especially if you don’t know the difference.
After all the Bible was, until recently, occult – only priests could read it. There are still many occult gospels and occult translations of official Biblical scripture.

Do what thou will is the left hand path. Entirely selfish and materialistic, hedonism.
https://www.clairenakti.com/articles/svecchacharya-do-what-you-will
translated: to sin is sacred.

Exactly what weak people want most to hear.
This is where New Age (one world order’s one world cult/religion) connects up to the Sexual Revolution, one is impossible without the other, promiscuity is the prayer of Satanists.
Plus a hefty dose of moral “relativism” i.e. “everything I do is right, relative to how much I wanted to do it”.
Being led by base instincts and lusts into the abyss.

I’ll go point by point on this one, it’s gold.

https://www.clairenakti.com/articles/the-inevitability-of-left-hand-practices
“tell me what aspect of reality you avoid out of weakness or fear”
NOT giving in is framed as the weakness.
Yep.
An alley cat is more moral than you.
“temporary at best (applied as a method),”
That’s right, the projection of ‘if I lack self control, so do you’!
“otherwise it is a form of escapism”
Uhuh. Having other priorities and not being a self-destructive wreck is actually escapism. OK.
Hollywood is full of sexualized escapists, they seem so well adjusted.
“A person must eventually come to terms with any and every object”
I don’t think alcohol, drugs and floating genitalia are going to chase you until you surrender.
“define their relation to it eventually”
I thought separation was an illusion? You don’t need it. You don’t need to engage with anything.
If you want to see whether a person is full of shit, see if they put sex on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Sex is not a need, Hollywood makes us use the wrong word, it is an urge. A need is something you die without, it’s Darwinian. The pyramid is individual and selfish, it cannot require or produce other people. The model is contained.
“When we speak of self-mastery, what we mean is that we are the owners and lords of our own self.”
No, your lust isn’t you. Id is your lowest self. It’s the body, not the soul.
“There is not a drug, woman, temptation, or authority figure who controls us.”
I swear that sounds like Oscar Wilde sarcasm.
“it is only from internal weakness that one can ever succumb to losing freedom to an external situation or object.”
It gets more bollocky. This is probably why women aren’t allowed to preach. Bullshit emotional rationalizations, male rationalizations are bad enough.
“All that the “left hand path” really is, is returning to reality from any artificial insulations or restrictions we have placed upon ourselves, and not becoming corrupted by anything. A pure person can remain pure even when having sex, eating meat or garlic, drinking alcohol, or owning a business– and assimilate any aspect of desire into their reality without being consumed or controlled by that desire.”
Losing yourself in alternate states is far from reality as possible.
People get corrupted every day, by bad ideas first.
Another attempt at inversion, pure is free from external influence. Have your cake or eat it. That’s reality.
Desire makes you weak. Buddhists know this.
Feeding it makes you weaker. Don’t listen to your heart, the Bible warns.
All vice works like that.

And every religion including the Vedic adjacent acknowledges spiritual ties made by sex especially. They are lifelong. They make you take on the karma of the other person, they harm. The spiritual purity thing is wrong in their own paradigm. Dissembling?

There is no such thing as a Divine Whore, it’s an oxymoron (for men too, like the French Kings who claimed to be God on Earth then acted like Zeus). Pious kings would still be alive. Spiritual ties debunk this false equivalence of energy body corruption with purity. They bind you, opposite to liberate.

To confess sin (to God, not men) is to ‘unburden yourself’.
If He removed the ties, you’d promise not to make more. Go forth and since no more – conditional.

“Nothing you can do will harm them or make them compromise their integrity, spiritual principles, and practices.”
Awfully convenient or people might have a conscience.
No standards, not Satanic at all.
“They own themselves and are self-realized; nothing can shake their lordship and self-sovereignty.”
Except a shekel, a bottle or a pair of tits.
Self-realized is independent. You cannot be an autonomous dependent on these vices.
Vices are wrong because they make you dependent.
You don’t learn how to properly use your energy, it’s wasted.
That’s a waste of your life(force) and that’s called bad karma.

Life force is finite, never waste it nor trust anyone who tells you to.

“Avoiding anything proves that it is too much for you”
Don’t knock it til you tried it logic is typical of idiots. I don’t need to try heroin to know it’s bad for me, thanks. I can see it destroying other people. Intelligence is spotting what hurts others and making the higher decision to not be like that.
“has mastered you or you know it could master you, and so you call it “evil”. ‘
Doesn’t believe in evil…
too easy to take shots at that one.

i.e. How to spot the possessed, lesson 1.

Does a fish believe in water?

“To an individual who established themselves as a lord over every part of themselves, there can be no “evil” because there is nothing that is uncontrolled.”
Being a conforming degenerate doesn’t make it moral or good for you.
Being the weakest slut in a brothel isn’t saying much.
The ultimate control is never letting it touch you. Anything less is a false dichotomy.
Drinking makes you drunk, weaker, the person who never needs to drink is always stronger.
They meet the same requirements of life from a higher place. This is envied, not the animal people.
“Fear is the result of not being able to control something”
Wrong, all cowards say that. Giving in is not strong either.
The impulse to control is lust.
“desire can threaten to overwhelm your integrity and abandon your willpower”
No desire is a part of you, don’t blame it. You own it.
You decide if you desire something. Logos.
Desire disappears if you decide why you don’t want it, mind over matter.

Mind > Matter

That’s why degeneracy is universally considered evil in all times.

It pollutes the contact to God.

“and the ability to transcend reality cannot be taught out of a book– it must be experienced by a person themselves”
things every cult leader says
just trust them
“The last of which is by far the most advanced, and requiring a person to have absolutely no personal weaknesses whatsoever and embrace every aspect of reality.”
Some of us humans can skip to that part. Deceivers like to say something true then “and” something false to get past the brain’s censors. It works on the feeble.
Embracing “reality” aka degeneracy is boring at that final point, talk to a 15yo about drinking and then again at 25.
The glamour is the lie, a curse, a deception. Seeing through it early on is something to be proud of.
“and the third group of two correspond to extremely refined individuals who have “divine” personality dominating.”
Just skip to that.
“The final stage has no restrictions whatsoever”
Lie, they have the most. They don’t view them as bad, they see the good reasons to be virtuous.

There is disgust with human animals of no structure and mind, incapable of control. That is no choice.

“and often uses living human women as Yantras or Talismans, and performs worship on their physical bodies rather than a picture or statue of deity.”
Hooking isn’t holy, this is why Sodom was punished by the real God.


Give the golden calf tits, why not?
“Because this path has no restrictions, it is obviously dangerous to the average person”
Oh, they’re not just deviants, they’re special deviants!
And they talk about illusion, kek
“cannot and will never go mainstream”
>title contradicts this
“To anyone who is sincere about transcending their limitations”
We can improve you goyim, only if you let us use you like a lowly goat for no shekels. Don’t ask questions, it’s impossible to explain or write down. Now bend over.
“they will inevitably come to follow this path”
spiritual gaslighting
or delusion
surely, if there’s no freedom of choice, you’re damned?
I thought the average person couldn’t do it? I was told it cannot be mainstream?
“This path is not about intellectual gymnastics, titles, or the like.”
Thank god they felt the need to point this out.
“It is the worship of “power” itself and this is, in reality, what everybody really wants deep down.”
No? Well, I don’t. That sounds really fruitless.
Worship the item instead of the symbol.
That is shallow.
“A woman wants to be beautiful and seductive because this is a sign of power.”
I thought it was a sign of histrionic personality disorder.
“A man wants to destroy his enemies or attain a position of power and wealth and is always seeking methods to obtain this.”
That’s really sexist. And if there’s no evil, what enemies? Why destroy them? Power over who? Why is materialism important?
Sounds like the distractions of the haltlose.
“A person who has a discriminating intelligence”
You seem like a smart man, I’d like to sell you a car.
“will realize that there is only one path to attaining any type of “power” and that it requires controlling the mind and mastering your own weaknesses.”
In context, that is hilarious.
Control your mind – by total weakness. They don’t recognize anything higher as possible.

That’s… sad.

“This is the path to Adepthood”
No such thing.
A mirage.

Show me one. ONE.

And isn’t that a title?

They expect you not to notice, lies contradict constantly.

“many true written works are published”
wait you said it can’t be written
“few find them ”

links would’ve been helpful there, unless you want to control the flow of info…

“and even fewer still practice the methods and exercises that lead to attainment.”
but they say physical purity is required
all religions, both sexes
it’s no coincidence most geniuses (a gift of God) were celibate

I love reading New Age crap. It’s like a whetstone for spotting truth from lie. All-lie is too obvious.

The guys who complain about make-up

are also the ones who’d complain if a woman smells like anything other than floral body lotion.

Like, they’ll criticize women for being fat but also being “high maintenance” i.e. not fat.

Nah-uh!

By ancient standards, you’re more decadent than a French king.

Think how poofy you’d be.

 

You sleep on fluffy pillows, on stitched mattresses, with plush blankets, having used liquid soap, shampoo, conditioner, toothpaste, deodorant, a comb, an electric razor, central heating/air conditioning, with a glass of cold milk waiting in your refrigerator if you wake up thirsty. You think this is nothing and feel entitled to this and more.

 

Who’s the vain one? When are these guys dispensing with all their vanities?

First up, the smartphone! Ultimate vanity symbol! Don’t need that!

Right….?

Right guys?

No, you won’t give up modern comforts so STFU lecturing everyone else.

Do it yourself first and then you might have something to signal with.

 

Being attractive isn’t a sin! These embittered boys are like SJWs and want everyone else to stop making an effort because they’re too lazy! (Covert narcissism, their ego is triggered because they stand out for not making the effort).
R-types want an equalist playing field, remember? Equal outcomes. They actually believe it’s better we’re all equal in stench and skin ailments (skin cancer exists) than feel insecure some dude next to them on the train is wearing nice jeans and a cool cologne.
Men against make-up, for a third-world society looking and smelling like shit.
It already does, in my opinion, let’s not make it worse. The average person makes less effort with their appearance than at any time period before in all human history.
Fashion history exists, whether you read it or not.
Porn taught you “make-up” (please define make-up, guys who can’t spot eyeliner) is a sexual invite and you’re pissed the fiction is fake. That isn’t the world’s fault. That’s your fault for being dumb. (They also think natural beauty is a sexual invitation because addicts are gullible idiots).
What other people look like and how they groom their body has nothing to do with you. Stop being so shallow and obsessing over it.
Grooming is a basic primate instinct. If you don’t have it, you’re clinically depressed.
They look at a naturally pretty girl and think she’s a bitch for wearing lipstick – who’s sinning here?
Jesus himself went off on one at the person who dared call his oil bath vain. There is a spiritual bond between how we treat ourselves (with respect) and how we act in the world (decently).
How dare any of you Americans (and it’s always Americans) shame people about simple standards of appearance?
I’ve been to your country enough times to know you have Fuck-All to be proud of in the appearance stakes.
Romans 12:1, NKJV. “I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is your reasonable service
1 Corinthians 10:31, NKJV. “Therefore, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.”
I Corinthians 6:19-20, NKJV. “Or do you not know that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God, and you are not your own? 20 For you were bought at a price; therefore glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are God’s.”
And there’s nothing sinful about having a woman’s body either, God made that too. To insult a woman’s natural form is to blaspheme God’s design.
Genesis 1:27, NKJV. “So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.”
Beautification is not a sin, and never has been (there are plenty of Biblical references about good, moral wives looking good too and being the pride of their husbands) it’s about a First World living standard and a longer lifespan, pride is the sin. Like presuming to judge other’s non-silicon appearance and the body/Temple God gave them…
If you look at the history of cosmetics, it’s always been primarily about health because, guess what? Healthy people are more attractive! Cosmeceuticals are not a new thing! Only in the past couple of centuries have they been separated off. Why? Legal reasons. Lower standards for non-medical products to hit the market or that they couldn’t prove the really subjective claims e.g. radiant smile. What’s that? How do you medically prove that?
These would be the “men” who attack other men for wanting to make the best of their appearance.
Leave them alone and join a pro-ugly group, you losers.
Sorry attractive people enjoying their life make you sad, but this isn’t a company’s fault, it’s evolution. [Explain sexual selection without attractiveness, I fucking dare you.]
Since it’s none of your business unless it’s your wife, join a monastery if attractive things frighten you. Do you balk at flowers and smiling babies too?
If everyone went back to smelling like ass and swamp crotch, you’d still be bottom of the barrel and whine about it. Fitness still exists.
Sports are as decadent as Hollywood but the guys claiming models shouldn’t be paid for what nature gave them never ever apply that logic to the genetic freaks known as athletes.
They’d only be happy in the world of Harrison Bergeron because pretty people couldn’t oppress them by comparison. Dya wanna ban Photoshop too? You do, don’t you?
It’s basic etiquette to look good and act good too.
This isn’t an either/or, don’t try to spin a false dichotomy out of this.
Looking like a slob is a sin as much as being it. It’s literally a sin to apply sloth to your personal care habits.
When are you banning mouthwash for making men seem more attractive than their natural oral bacteria (including the likes of Herpes) might suggest?
Jesus never used mouthwash. QED according to you.

Video: Sin is a disease

Sexual hygiene will make a comeback, whether you like it or not.

Like, you learn to wash your hands or keep dying of cholera.

The Sexual “Revolution” will be seen as a mass murderer in times to come.

Stereotypes are true. Those people are shunned (including a perception of inferiority to one another!) due to social contagion.

What is allowed (not punished) becomes implicitly good.

The gold standard logical test applies: if everyone did this, would society collapse?

Because yes, no individual should either. It involves other people so it isn’t actually an individual choice. It requires corruption, always evil. Since society pays (on disease load alone) then it isn’t actually a personal claim, it’s a withdrawal from the public good.

Yes, tragedy of the commons applies to moral goods in society.
You want other people to stop being dicks on the road but act like one yourself.

Society keeps rewarding sin because chaos makes money.

It keeps the economy consuming and GDP high enough to tread water.
e.g.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-44802123

It can’t last, it won’t last, understand why.

Random but they always look weird, like middle-aged but plastic smooth?

It’s like a circus freakshow, I swear.

White rape gangs

Before any spoiled little shit tries to change the subject, when men are raped they can’t get pregnant or endure fatal physical damage (especially virgin females) so yes, it is completely different and shame on you for equating the biology for virtue signalling points.

It’s a false equivalence. The area the sexes hugely differ is the reproductive systems.

At the very least, women have more nerves to damage.

Women and children are permanently vulnerable so no, it isn’t all about men. Stop waving around your man card for five fucking minutes. This is about civilization. There should be an expectation of safety or why bother?

The statistics are very clear and rape shouldn’t exist for anyone, ideally. However, most rapists, regardless of target, are male and this is indisputable. That is your red suppository.

Ah, but the snowflakes who try to refocus any attention on them like a sweet 16 TV star don’t want to admit that women are vulnerable, because then men have to be responsible for their own feels. The Bible is very clear that your own lust is yours to control. Pluck out thine eyes than sin with them. Unless you can seriously claim you’re holier than God, fuck off with your victim blaming and blame the biggest claimed victim, yourself.

What do you really expect? The public space to be a sexual trigger-free safe space like some low IQ shithole? Why not live there? Ah, but it’s about happiness isn’t it? Other people’s natural erotic capital makes you feel insecure. If you can’t be attractive, you’ll ask every attractive person to cover up because Harrison Bergeron was the fucking documentary prequel to Idiocracy. It’s impossible and ridiculous to presume a standard for the West we never needed. Men are turned on by fantasy, how do we ban that? Is staring outlawed? The sadism of restricting normal healthy First World expressions is insane. Where is the line? Kids can’t be topless on beaches too?

Pedophiles exist. Gay men too so men gotta wear niqabs too. For a pervert atheist’s definition of “modesty”, no shoes, no cars, no toasters… people want to fuck all of those. It isn’t about the sexual object, its own feelings don’t matter. It’s all about the long suffering deviant who “can’t help it”, infantilization like that reduces their legal responsibility, somehow (fact: only if you’re retarded). And instead of inventing some etiquette when we’re in dire need of exactly that we’re going to blame the world for stimulating them with photons.

Sure, if I robbed a bank I “can’t help it” because I like money, right? Like that?
I am attracted to money, no word of a lie so I can roll around naked on it like a sexy Godfather. Money swimming because moon bathing is for hippies and witches.

Children get away with things because compared to an adult their growth is retarded. They literally don’t have as much impulse control as an adult but studies show everyone can learn! Even the thick! I bet you’re glad you have no excuse now, huh?

No?

You all argue in bad faith. It isn’t about goodness, it’s about you feeling good about yourself.

The SJWs have fat acceptance, the MGTOW have ugly appreciation. Anyone not naturally ugly must be covered in shame, because beauty isn’t divine or ordained to be enjoyed by god as part of nature! These people don’t believe in beauty (their ego cannot “tolerate” it) but they’ll gnaw your ear off with a false teleology of evolution (I read the book, it isn’t in there) where ugly psychopathic weaklings are the Ubermensch because they’re “man” enough to rape.

Bear in mind, Western culture = Western aesthetic expression.
If you aren’t free to express, culture is dead. Muslims are getting skirts banned in schools. That’s your team. That is your stated side of history. If you look in the real legal history of the West, sumptuary laws never ever worked. Lower hemlines solve nothing. And that was class appropriation. Men loved crossdressing for millennia before women! If women had to dress like men, only men would complain! We like being warm in winter! Men lose out on the opportunity to assess a future spouse’s genetic fitness based on physique. Hope you like a lemon. If every woman must cover up, every woman is tacitly informed to let themselves go, since they can’t display their value for a potential mate or social value among other women. Hence, the fat acceptance win.

Look how many women in niqabs are obese compared to hijabs. Modest, huh?

The corset was a response to Victorian obesity. Shameful fat is modern. The only permanently skinny people in the olden days were the starving poor, everyone else fluctuated because seasons exist and central heating didn’t.

Henry VIII wore the equivalent of a bandage dress on his obesity and not one of you fat-shamers say a thing about it!

People get murdered for no reason. Rape is the same, you don’t have to “do” anything, that’s a Just World fallacy. Predators randomly attack. Unless you want to bring back either castration or hanging to limit that ability, you don’t get to bitch that the victims were “asking for it” but only if female. That is sadistic and vengeful, respectively.

Society is about a realistic appraisal of how shitty humans are and shaming it. If shaming rapists makes you feel personally attacked then fine. Get a therapist.

Everybody hates these guys because they do nothing of their own volition; it’s spiteful, reactive, insecure whining when they feel someone, somewhere, might make them question their beliefs or feel bad in empathy for three seconds. That must hurt. They never start charities, host their own platforms and debates, no lobbying, God forbid! Nothing with effort. They use the rape of others as a verbal battering ram to protect their grandiose ego and it’s sickening to anyone with a conscience.

Off-topic: Making a joke about rape isn’t the same as threatening rape and the joke is still in poor taste if you phrase it poorly. Getting offended someone didn’t laugh at your joke is pathetic, finding rape horrific is not.

You want a virtue signal? I was here for years before you and caught shit from feminists for having a male rape tag and also talking about child grooming, kidnapping, rape gangs. I refused to pretend it was just little girls too and have firsthand experience with victims to know, how many of you can say that? People somewhat believed little boys were a possibility but struggle to believe to this day that adults can be taken in too. “Trafficking” is the media term, its real name is Modern Slavery. You believe any anecdote a man writes and disbelieve any female, that’s called misogyny. Even the Muslims aren’t that bad. SJWs do the opposite, believing any woman and mocking any man in pain, they are also evil cunts. It’s hypocritical evil and it’s still evil and you can’t make me say it’s not. Now the MRA assholes stream in to tell me I’m an SJW because I believe virginity is real (they don’t) and only women can get pregnant (they don’t).

I’m neither! Neither of you assholes can label me in the other camp. It’s being normal.

Some of us can see over our identity to the issues!

I’ve been targeted by everyone! They all think I’m the other guy!

It is possible to care about ALL rape victims at the same time, while acknowledging that for medical reasons, there are differences! This is the one crime where you cannot ignore anatomy! Sorry bro??!

Update: I’ll put this here, whatever.

And the #MeToo thing helped open up a national conversation here to the abuse of largely boys in boarding schools, until you morons shut it down by taking the piss (even out of male victims, brave) and now it’s all been covered up again. It might be impossible now to retread that ground, the old ones are dying off. Congratulations, you’ve personally helped defend pedophile rings. They were being exposed and you stopped it for feels. Thanks for spoiling my plan, fuckheads. It’s called the Overton Window.

Now everyone’s gone back to making insulting films about their privilege.
I’d rather not be raped far from home as a child, thanks. Boarding School Syndrome might go aways to explaining all the cucks. The parents to this day don’t want their child blamed for or suspected of seducing the adult, male teacher.
There is your toxic masculinity.

Did I mention there is no legal obligation to report child rape? Even the schools don’t need to tell the State (that will do nothing).
And the age of consent helps this along, to continue to exist? The consent that was Victorian, provisional (intended to rise with biological information we now have to make majority 18, majority was de facto 16 then for the military) and intended to prevent child rape and prostitution?

Dragging pedophiles and rapists into broad daylight shouldn’t frighten you.

Our time period in history will likely be called Pedophile’s Paradise.

They tried to take MeToo and re-shape it because it was working.
It proved they don’t own the internet. It’s the only place to change hearts. Most people don’t have minds.

Or would it make more sense if I titled this with brackets?

Idiots. There was no Plan B and they knew it. For a split second, their media hold was dead. And some of the swarthier among you had to pretend rape doesn’t happen to women…. really? Castrate yourself, you don’t deserve that dick.

The people doing the rape might be white but what about the people protecting them from justice?

Idiots can’t see logically how their actions bring about chaos. They misunderstand the situation and fuck it up for the smart ones who planned it.

Why did Hollywood suddenly go quiet on the Marxist support during that whole thing, no politics? Didn’t you notice? Hope and tacit support. They wanted to see who won before coming out. You shot us. I’m still pissed. The children suffer the most. Thanks, defend the guy with a rape button under his desk! Penis mafia! Traitor.

Spot the difference.

Stick a great big swinging dick on it. That would be honest about your priorities: Muh Dick.

They let you win – for them. You were anti-white, so you won. Who’s the SJW here?

If your workplace forces you to concede orgies are morally okay and you probably secretly wanted to be raped by your boss, anything you say about those people will be used to paint you as crazy or the real rapist here. Unless society’s standards change (denial stops) and all these people are brought to light. A spotlight.

Awkwardness is the entire point.

You might notice Denial Stops as the mantra of the red pill. Idiots.

The only way to defeat a victim culture is with real victims.

Even the white predators target whites. Those are also not okay.

You wouldn’t get over yourself so you played yourself.