until the Boomers die off and/or the economy improves.
I have been saying this since Best Post in 2014 and even before then.
It is Christian to punish the wicked system with non-compliance. Jesus turned the other cheek. They also say about “sparing” us the suffering of marriage, if it can be avoided.
“Are you free of commitment? Do not look for a wife.” – 1 Cor 7:27
I’m tired of fake Christians lying about this, it’s American Churchian bullshit that everyone should marry as God’s Will. There aren’t even enough women mathematically to go around if you forced everyone to marry at the point of a shotgun regardless of low IQ, homosexuality, infertility, poverty etc. Stop lying. What you say or imply is impossible and immoral.
“But those who marry will face troubles in this life,and I want to spare you this.” 1 Cor 7 again
There are no simple solutions, the birth rate is a SYMPTOM itself.
Whites are meant to have a K-select birth rate anyway.
There is no reason to invest in a system stealing your resources to fund the dysgenic families of others. There is no reason to produce kids that will be encouraged to take puberty blockers and learn about anal in year 1. There is no reason to settle with men who have whored around in Thailand with children and feel entitled to a “good girl” after deflowering and abandoning multiple of them years prior. They can’t even morally lead themselves, as adult individuals, let alone sons and daughters, whom they’d lead astray with weakness. Men have no moral authority in this era, based on their actions. Women do not respect modern men and the disgust is earned i.e. the fuckboy and manchild thing are valid objections by women. You’re white and acting like ghetto shit, stop it.
Why did 53% of white women vote Trump? Why did Leave win? Women want men to sort out the country and that must happen before they start doing their part re family. You have to clean the soil before planting seeds and the West is plagued with weeds and worse, locust.
By all means, mock Emma Watson – but I got there first.
However, nobody tells her how to find a good man.
Or which system she should marry in.
Or how many kids is optimal for the marriage.
s i l e n c e
So none of you are actually contributing intellectually. Negative nancies add nothing. Women already get shamed by the (((SJWs))) when they voice that pressure where they want a family, you’re helping them.
As it is, there is a systemic movement, rarely spoken by the middle class journo class.
We’re (young white people) deliberately starving out the zombie socialist pension ponzi. Good.
Let it burn. That’s exactly what we want. Don’t threaten us with a good time.
This is how women rebel in particular, passively. If you’re gonna burn down a house, do you renovate the kitchen?
No, no you fucking do not.
Just ask various women: “Honestly, are women putting off marriage and kids until men get their act together?”
Listen to the steady stream of well thought-out complaints.
We’ve seen women, perfect wives, dumped in middle age for Ting Tong. Who’d bother? Or women left with nothing because, staying at home, they couldn’t afford a lawyer. Women abandoned because their husband died without life insurance (or they didn’t pay) and he vainly didn’t want her with a good CV out the home so now the kids are on welfare. Why bother? Men have failed. Women discuss these failures openly, in bathrooms with strangers all the way to at events, we compare notes on how men we’ve seen or heard of socially are failing as patriarchs. It isn’t gossip, it’s strategy.
Even the Guardian types are now in gnosis:
The host is cutting off the leeches. Even Labour MPs don’t want to send their kids to diverse schools.
The rebellion is righteous, good and moral. We’re fucking the sinners over by going Galt.
“Hate what is evil, cling to what is good” style.
The actual Bible, Ecc 4:
“I saw the tears of the oppressed—
and they have no comforter;
power was on the side of their oppressors—
and they have no comforter.
2 And I declared that the dead,
who had already died,
are happier than the living,
who are still alive.
3 But better than both
is the one who has never been born,
who has not seen the evil
that is done under the sun.
Not having kids isn’t a sin or Jesus would be a sinner. You’re not better than Jesus for fucking some slag at a party while high. You are not God, as some arrogant men on this topic try to pervert or add to the Word. Do not make a vow to God you will not keep, don’t get married just to say you have like some vapid CA twat. You don’t know Christianity better than Jesus. Having kids isn’t a sign of morality, especially with the deadbeats and ghetto people doing it now. Young people are aware of the things their Boomer or Gen X parents shamed them for – being too loud or expensive or interrupting their “fun” or “ruining their life”, and presently stopping that cycle of abuse. Good. Don’t have kids you can’t afford, we need to sink back to pre-WW demographic levels and composition anyway.
The secret of change is to focus all of your energy, not on fighting the old, but on building the new” – Socrates.
Like Vox Day has said, white demographics are fine, historically. Eternal growth is cancer, food for socialist lampreys. They’ll fail eventually and do you want to be personally responsible for four, five kids when that happens? These same guys bitching muh sub-replacement balk at child support for one kid, STFU. You’re not a man then if you don’t want 100% of your gender role as provider. If the woman puts in her 100% by having the kids, you gotta pay for her to stay with them. That’s the point of marriage. Historically, some people didn’t breed and it was fine as long as they weren’t the brave WW lot, conned by bankers. We must focus on incentives, punishing the stupid actively and encouraging quality parents. Encouraging dysgenic higher birth rates is actually the white genocide, it pressures the system whites rely on (in their homeland) with foreigners and idiots.
It’s funny there are people deluded enough to think humans will always exist anyway, evolution is useful but not a purpose. The Bible explicitly says God will wipe us out anyway, at some point, the genetic legacy male argument is futile and won’t sway women. Women care about husband quality and enjoying that, kids are just part of the marriage. Women marry for the man. Stop kidding yourself.
There might be a war soon, we’re overdue. Food prices are going up, making home economics useless. The economy is stagnating from the idiot parasite load. Who wants more mouths to feed? At this time? The only people I’ve seen planning kids soon are morons. They feel entitled to the earnings of everyone else… it won’t end well.
4 And I saw that all toil and all achievement spring from one person’s envy of another.”
Where’s the incentive? If the game is rigged, wait until a new one comes along.
Let it burn.
Would you work under Communism? Well we have demographic Communism. Let them fail.
They wanted this revolution, this system of sodom, this evil.
This is the world you wanted, globalist socialists! You don’t get to moan!
Better not to have kids than abort them like a Boomer. Anti-natal involves sleeping around with no reproduction, it isn’t a person minding their own business and being …human, more than vain, rutting beast. Nobody I know wants their kids growing up in a diverse area, even in their homeland. It’s a silent strike. There are Boomers who actually feel entitled to demand their kids go into lifelong debt so they can have grandkids, who’d inherit that debt, despite getting money from their own parents to set up and breed. The social contract is dead. The practical intelligence (phronesis) comes in, young people are not stupid and can barely stay afloat for economic reasons, thanks to decades of multicultural policies and colonies voted in by the exact retards kvetching about birth rates. Fuck you, it’s your fault.
The birth rate won’t “improve” until 1. Boomers retire so young people can earn enough to set up 2. men are held accountable for kids they produce, many here don’t pay child support so…. why have kids, even in marriage? even marriage itself is no security so women are scared to breed, they also see the shorter lifespan for women in marriage and male abandonment for a younger model being enabled… why invest? Why? Men don’t commit. 3. no more hook-up culture as the bait on the hook to women that they must be whores to get male attention to maybe possibly get married and have a family. Eggs are expensive, stop trying to flip gender roles into women impressing effeminate losers who think they’re the shit for being worthless degenerates. Women are on strike especially. Women have a genetic legacy in siblings and cousins. This is why women care-take post-menopause while men become useless compared to the young competition (even military is a brutal Wall) and get various “mysterious” health problems with higher mortality (abandoning wife and kids that way) or just self-murder. Men want a genetic legacy personal to them but refuse to admit they need women (the ew cooties mgtow) or actually appreciate them for it so…. I guess your line dies with you? Who wants to give everything to a person who despises them? Femininity isn’t weak or evil.
Who wants to have kids to feed the Beast?
Whether it’s the fiat system throttling us on a timer or the rape gang Muslims down the street?
White people have a beautiful form of revenge, we will happily cut our nose off to spite our face. The left fears it, fears being cut off the host, shrieks when white people retreat. Fuck ’em.
We don’t have to just Go Along with your plans to destroy us, (((Activist))).
We’re not queuing up -with kids in tow- for the white gulag. This is siege warfare.
Multicultural societies have a lower birth rate because women are expecting and awaiting a war. Gladly. With no national security, the cultural shamed, people cowed and weak men literally inviting barbarians to take our ancestors’ gifts to us, why invest in the men who allowed this?
None of you hand-rubbing sadists happy about Mz “Self-Partnered” can answer me that question.
Whether she’s aware of it or not, this is how women actually work. We want a war. That caused your Baby Boom last century, remember?
This is how history and women actually operate. We breed with winning genes, not losers avoiding a fight like a PC damsel.
And don’t make the WW1/2 banker “mistake” of leaving the weak dysgenic men at home, the purpose is a cull of weak genes. Then you’ll get your birth rates up. Just look at the fashions of the time – pin-up. That’s what women want to be if you bring them war. We shouldn’t have to ask for it, that’s part of the test. Men are supposed to want to protect their nation. Then women protect their genes into the next generation. That’s the way around, we’re not the ones failing to pull our gender weight among young, fertile people. Men move first to make society safe, whether or not they know a “good one”. It’s an insult to us that you allow colonialism to continue. The women are nubile, the men ineffectual. Why don’t women want them? Why does Prince Charming always fight somebody in fairytales, and kill for her, if you wanna be Peterson about this?
Women are eugenic in the choice to breed and who with. Women don’t actually care about a genetic legacy, for themselves. At least slag off bachelors and spinsters properly. There are good reasons (religious, national, economic) for the choice, bad reasons (global warming, white guilt, SJWism – probably a cover for the same instincts) and those for whom it isn’t a choice, they have their ducks in a row (no survival priorities) and they’re desperately searching, like Emma and all the bitter MGTOWs who were in fact rejected by women (all women) first. This is Darwin 101 – sexual selection is a eugenic culling force. FEATURE, NOT A BUG. Better to have no kids, than invest in shit tier kids who’d get you killed in a war. Then there’s Red Army rape considerations if the children are a little older. Women sense civil unrest coming. It simply isn’t safe.