Un-personing is against human rights.
Digital Sine nomine.
They’re depriving a person of their livelihood, nowadays a social media presence is compulsory. They brought this about, they are duty bound to it. They serve US, all of us.
Terms and conditions do NOT apply above the state’s law and common law.
Terms and conditions are not legally binding documents until proven so. They are literally made up and “complied with” completely arbitrarily – not how real laws work.
These are ideological witch hunts.
300 years ago, they’d be accusing the prettiest woman in town of being a witch because she wouldn’t sleep with them.
I would question the moral code of these social media companies especially YouTube. I flagged content made by a YouTuber encouraging adults to sleep with minors (named kun Tyra or something) and YouTube kept the content up without flagging the channel for child endangerment. Let seek out this union and because this behaviour stinks to high heaven.
It’s like how tumblr is a porn site but parents let their kids on it because the kids only show them sweet Disney cartoons. On Youtube, most channels are shilling and they aren’t legally required to disclose this. You want full power? You need full responsibility. No “mistakes were made”. I’ve flagged things as literally toxic – nobody cares!
They are guilty of treason by acting as judge, jury and executioner, terms and conditions are NOT “enforced” because they are not a government. Nobody knows who they are, they are biased and nobody can vote them in/out. They are acting beyond their authority.
Internet access is a human right, it was proven in an EU court.
and the UN agreed
As in, “de-platforming” online is illegal. Equivalent to banning someone from a public park (speaker’s corner)!
Monopoly laws must be applied.
The world’s noosphere isn’t run by middle-class post-grad America.
They are just a platform, the power is with the people.
They’re scared of him, which will make more people listen, the morons.
aka why hardly anyone links to me.
The best way to win on this is to push the classist angle.
They are. They’re keeping the lower orders in line. It’s all about classist brainwashing.
This isn’t like kicking a gadfly from a college class. That’s also technically illegal since they pay for the class.
You’re a utility, you can’t turn down anyone for service.
My electric can’t switch it off because they dislike my opinions on ketchup.
My water company can’t stop because my musical taste sickens them.
They are there to provide service. To serve. Censorship is illegal. Nobody signs up to be censored.
Social media FANG-type stock would collapse tomorrow if they couldn’t illegally handle your data and get away with it. PM/DMs/Email are privileged communications. If you’re speaking about medical issues over DM or to your lawyer by email, it is breaking privacy law (the human right) to scan or read it. They’re opening your letters.
Judging, editing, copying and/or banning it is…super-illegal.
They’re a public service. The Post Office doesn’t approve you for sending mail.
They serve the public. The public > Them.
Do you really think this info just stays in the companies? They don’t talk, compile hit lists, gossip to their friends about this one user?