If you want blood of the indigenous our leaders fucked up, try the Irish. We literally sold to foreigners the ample food supply we had (happens now with China and domestic food prices for us, as covered) and let them starve to death, including the women and children. Who needs a Holodomor when you have… whatever this is? Free trade is practically slavery, pass it on. Technically, arguments could be made for agrarian treason. We paid for those farmers to labour and toil for our plate, with our taxes. Monarchies have noblesse oblige. France learned the hard way. As I always said, we need national (loyal) capitalism, to protect the workers and People.
Do you really own your country if the CCP is buying up your precious farmland? Estate agents were despised for this reason, historically. They’ll sell you from under your very feet, no care for wars and national loyalty.
nb How is soaking a flag with blood, NOT incitement? What’s next, burning a Guy? He was white so….? I guess Catholicism was the first religion of pieces, technically. Which is the best kind of correct. Just like the Munster rebellion had the first religious rape gangs in Europe, under the guise of E Q U A L I T Y. The Left are seldom original.
https://psychologydictionary.org/anticathexis/ They push down their innate racism with anti-racism. The supremacist feelings are re-directed from national pride to classism over the in-group. Think about it, the people over-breeding in Idiocracy were all depicted as white. If terms like ‘white trash’ were banned, they couldn’t differentiate themselves to the out-group. Reversing in-group preference is quite a feat. This is why the SJWs can never address classism (and Marx tried*) and it’s free real estate. They replaced race with the broader power dynamic of class and it shows. Class seems cuddlier but isn’t. Class will become more contentious when it never has been in our cultural history, due to demographic heterogeneity. Boomer-bashing: white middle-class, Karens: white middle-class and working poor, empty accusations of misogyny: rich white men. Class conflict will ramp up, mark my words.
*Marx would have succeeded with his uprising if the natives were troubled by multicultural conflict and unrest. An all-white nation was just too comfortable, that’s why Frankfurt school suddenly decided mass immigration and genocidal replacement was ‘necessary’.
It also explains MRAs, pushing women away because they’re lonesome.
except women are not selfless or babies would die from her under-eating etc. Men are the sacrificial sex, in addition to bravery and kin loyalty. A common error to ascribe to women for being passive. A selfless woman does not have children, she cares for the family she already has. SJWs are broken because they divert maternal drive to non-kin offspring and aid to non-kin competition (with their kin). ie. selflessness in women is pathological altruism. Women must be selfish to privilege the in-group, like a protective lioness. SJWs attack white women for being ‘selfish’ in myriad ways e.g. destroying the planet by existing, polluting the world with their children and being ‘evil’ for wanting their kids to succeed.
Meanwhile, any so-called matriarchy in terms of child-rearing would likely exert a k-effect, all else being sane; https://psychologydictionary.org/vandenbergh-effect/ all else being equal. This is why women traditionally raise the kids for the tender years. Too many creepy stranger men around throws the population off, which only happens under deadbeat (mother abandonment) conditions, in nature.
So they can wear police uniforms, asylum hospital uniforms, colonial uniforms and fascist outfits, but it’s okay because they’re the ‘right’ skin colour? I warned you they’d be doing this. SJWs steal symbols of order and ideology all the time, they’re sartorial phagocytes.
rebellions require aesthetics, that’s why, so this is important
they cleverly prevent rebellion against their ideas by being superficial turncoats to all rivals e.g. the shaved side haircut a few years ago, making group differentiation all but impossible online, which is a visual medium
so this is really important, strategically
not ‘just fashion’
fashion demonstrates power, a king with his crown
Also SJWs only wear crosses, which is either really bigoted in the sense they don’t dare wear Jewish (they claim same religion) or Muslim symbols (all monotheism) and it is both an endorsement of Christian values embedded in the aesthetic, as well as flagrantly disrespectful if you don’t practise that religion but appropriate the symbols to seem ‘edgy’. I’ve asked people wearing a cross if they were Christian and what type and they looked at me like I was the idiot. That’s like waving an Islamic State flag and wondering why you got arrested. Yet they slag people off just wearing guns for self-defence…. hey, it’s their aesthetic, right, tumblrfags?
aesthetics are a tool of domination, all empires had them
technically, wearing a cross in mockery or parody could be considered a hate crime so there’s that
(the Christian cross was invented specifically for Christians and doesn’t mean anything else, that’s why)
humiliation by trivialising the sacred, like Pussy Riot trashing a church
so yes, it’s important
standard SJW strategy, like it or not, this is how the Cultural Marxists are coming for us
Western patriarchy IS an aesthetic and nobody is saying anything while they’re stealing it. Just wow.
false flagging with aesthetics is like the female v of ‘sneaky fucker strategy’, it’s fake femininity like an ugly person becoming a gym rat to obscure or cloak their deficits in Darwinian fitness. SJWs are dressing up like tradwomen (cottagecore) so tradmen listen to them or stop listening to tradwomen, suspecting them as SJWs (both outcomes destroy the traditional family unit and group harmony)
fashion is war for women but it is also national (pride) and this has been forgotten recently with “”international publications”””
yet the manosphere never talks about fake femininity…. they just so happen to keep netting NPD and BPD women, who fake their femininity…. to control men….. ….and wonder why this keeps happening
Hollywood won the white West over with aesthetics, wake up! This IS important. They don’t make neoclassical buildings anymore because they fill us with HOPE. What about clothes? Are some more healthy and inspiring than others? It isn’t about hemlines, it’s the whole aesthetic and its philosophy underpinning it!
Meanwhile, in the comments are people saying Americans shouldn’t expect other cultures to change to suit them… ok… then let Poland be Polish, Germany be German and England be English? The gaslighting is amazing.
Yet the controlled ops of the right uses none of the appropriation discussion and continues to ignore it, an easy win in the culture war. Sometimes I think the right doesn’t exist anymore and it’s 99% controlled ops with the odd weirdo like me. I should’ve taken the ticket, perhaps.
SJWs create nothing, they can only steal/appropriate. They stole pop culture music, drama, comedy, painting/art and now they’re coming for fashion and the right flops over like a dying dog exposing its belly because it’s ‘just stupid clothes hur dur’.
I’m thinking of giving up, the real men are long dead. They’re all nihilists at this point making stupid podcasts and edgy youtube whinefests, why bother?
Instead we have navel-gazers ignoring this stuff, controlled ops shills and peter pan syndrome in search of a replacement mommy. Mummy issues are not right wing. A wife won’t be your mommy. Stop. Waifu is peak Oedipus.
I don’t understand why is that outfit so offensive, like, it’s lolita fashion, we’re dressing like rococo period children but it’s not like we agree with or romanticize the political climate of 1700’s France
but they do romanticize it, specifically the framing and murder of an innocent mother. A con artist stealing a necklace led to an innocent woman’s gorey death but YAY ruffles!
it’s like walking around dressed as Lincoln with a bloody gunshot wound to the head, WTF
and you wonder why French people hate Americans? REALLY?
mocking their brutally murdered relatives, maybe?
but the mongrel at the end made a joking-not joking reference to decapitating anyone she calls an oppressor….
she’s wearing clothes made by slaves… she’d be the one decapitated
“The best thing you can do is appropriate Western culture”
that’s how Cultural Marxists employ Down with Western Civ, because they know everything they touch turns to shit – vidya, books, films, music….
it’s quite genius when you think about it. Their new game plan uses their blanket incompetence as an aggressive force.
This is why they’re dressing like white patriarchs from the 40s with affectations to match e.g. drinking, smoking etc. They’re trying to out-man the white men like trannies are trying to out-slut American slutty women.
British Karen claims to be British, not English, but hates being British despite using the colonial term, and reads the Guardian to signal she’s ‘not like other girls’ and ‘not like other whites’. She is an honorary non-white, in her mind, and will call everyone else bigoted for polite disagreement with the opinions she clearly ripped off from a journalist. British Karen derides plastic but has a twice a day Starbucks habit and never met a polyester dress she didn’t like. All her fashion packages come in five layers of the stuff, because the companies are going ‘green’ by using cheaper, weaker packaging, rather than cardboard boxes. British Karen is a part-time vegan, long-term insufferable windbag constantly complaining about what everyone else is eating due to her own body dysmorphia. In spite of seeing a therapist who secretly hates her, British Karen refuses to admit she may have an eating disorder. She complains about her entire family for not ‘being enough’. Her mood fluctuates with her weight and woe betide the poor SOB who encounters her in a fat mood, or as she calls it, ‘bloated’. She has been bloated for about a decade now. British Karen uses canvas bags shipped to her door from ebay in ten layers of the finest Chinese plastic and since she keeps misplacing them, needs to keep repurchasing from the intercontinental oil tankers, all in the name of ‘reducing her carbon footprint’. British Karen attends dinner parties with pricey alcohol and nibbles – mostly meat and cheese, and has no objection to their carbon heavy nature (alcohol included) because they are free and it would be ‘rude not to’. British Karen pretends she shops mostly at Waitrose by using their bags when she’s really more of the average Sainsburys customer. She claims to be working-class despite living in a lily-white middle-class ‘community’ where she feels no fear of stabbing. British Karen claims to be colour-blind but calls all brown children ‘refugees’ in totally real stories that actually happened, because it’s moral to judge the citizenship of people by looking at them. British Karen is opposed to slavery but owns a smartphone made by children, which she uses to tell people that the Victorians buying cotton were just as racist and evil as the plantation owners themselves, if not worse. British Karen frequently dines in exotic restaurants where food is prepared by exotic chefs using exotic recipes, illegally working in the country after being held here by traffickers who claim they now owe a debt and must work it off. The international legal books call this slavery but British Karen calls it the globalist economy. British Karen similarly ’employs’ a series of nannies, drivers and other ‘staff’ helpers and prefers they be of similar exotic descent, because they’re ‘better workers’ and ‘willing to do jobs the white people won’t’. British Karen doesn’t officially employ these people at the legal minimum wage, but nobody challenges this. British Karen is offended by the implication she’d be forced to raise her own spawn, but calls motherhood her most ‘rewarding work’, as she over-sees the sprog handing-off process between various brown ‘nannies’ when they’re not being raped at a distant boarding school. British Karen would say ‘boys will be boys’ because she doesn’t believe men can be raped, since she considers all boys part of the Patriarchy oppressing her, personally. British Karen will turn any daughter into a slutty, angry alcoholic to ’empower her’ and complain any son is distant and ‘unavailable’ to listen to her First World Problems, like the shops having no organic quinoa. Imagine her suffering! Her favourite spread is hummus because it feels foreign to her and reminds her of Greece, a country she doesn’t consider white because of their tan. She calls them continentals, broadly, and appreciates their ‘culture’ as clearly superior to her own, which she denies is her own. British Karen gets an orange spray tan but claims you cannot be a chav unless you’re poor and ideally living on a council estate. British Karen also has greyish ashy barely blonde hair, in a choppy cut that accentuates her manjaw. British Karen chugs coffee like a fish drinking water but claims to be confused as to the cause of her omnipresent ‘anxiety’, for which she suffers sleepless nights and hormonal imbalances. British Karen wears cakey thick make-up in a matchy orange tone she calls ‘bronze’, likely by Charlotte Tilbury. British Karen gets botox but claims chemicals are bad for you and she’s avoiding them by buying organic. She claims to be aging naturally through a taut corpse-like grimace and dead-eyed, unblinking stare. She hasn’t frowned fully since 2002. British Karen is a strong independent white woman who expects the men present to always pick up the tab, even when she invited them and chose the restaurant. If not, she will insist on ‘splitting’ with everyone present, despite being the only one to order three alcoholic beverages in the course of one hour. British Karen has prosecco meme stationery and thinks her true personality only comes out when she is drunk, since gin is so ‘fancy’. Somewhere she has an expensive candle collection nobody is allowed to use, at least one in the vague shape of a prickly pineapple. British Karen is very quick to question your motives for moral propriety, but refuses to go to church, seeing as how she spends Sunday mornings hung over and nobody ‘important’ will be there. British Karen is spiritual but not religious, meaning she bought a few crystals once and likes to talk about people’s ‘unhelpful’ energy when they dare disagree with her. Her vision boards must contain pictures of Hitler because she finds Nazis wherever she goes. Everyone except British Karen is a bigot, definitions be damned. British Karen speaks for and translates for everyone as if they were babies. She is also telepathic, knowing what you ‘really think’ whether you’re male, female, black, brown, white, hetero or homosexual. She is judge, jury and executioner in all moral disputes, because the newspaper people would never lie to us. British Karen does not know the meaning of propaganda.
British Karen is a spiteful mutant, who likes babies when asked but hates spending any length of time with her own. She definitely has a secret mumsnet account. Everyone is privileged except for her. She is special. She is without sin. It’s the other adults who are ‘problematic’, literally everyone else must be corrected and she won’t rest until she tells you how damaged you are, in the name of empathy.
She’s Karen to her friends, but that’s Mz Grundy to you.
A little above my usual MS paint fare but it’ll do.
I could do something more complex but you get the gist.
If monks weren’t writing the sins, they would’ve included cowardice because it clearly is a sin, from Thomas to Judas (it was the cowardice of the kiss, more than overt betrayal). However, they were the first “pacifists” (military dodgers) despite Jesus’ line about buying a sword.
It’s almost like certain groups wanted to weaken us by wedging in cowardly enabling as a virtue.
Reminder: at no point in the Bible was tolerance a virtue. “Hate what is evil, cling to what is good”.
In fact, in-group preference is literally a commandment – love your brother, your neighbour, the proximate, as yourself. Pathological altruism is the sort of prideful temptation we can only dub Satanic, it violates ‘honour thy mother and thy father’ and opposes the true meaning of ‘thou shalt not adulterate’ (your bloodline). People don’t save, unless you’re Jesus.
I don’t care if Vox Day rips this off one day, but include the accurate commentary like the true meaning of Thou shalt not adulterate, K?
Reminder: at no point does Jesus condemn slavery, in fact, he admonished slavers for not treating their slaves better. Nike and Apple – Christian in their slavery?
But they refuse to get educated about Barbary slavery of white women, Ottomans, Romans etc.
The feminism is dead there. They only want to talk about white people dominating brown ones.
I’ve heard barefaced lies about the Indian mutiny, where they raped various white women and little girls. It was a huge scandal at the time. In all the papers. They’re whitewashing with the dregs of Tumblr history.