What’s the simplest explanation?

the people wanting to normalise pedophilia are pedos themselves

and “sex with” is one of their terms, if they’re a child it’s always rape

sex refers to consensual, which isn’t possible

How long until the parents figure out the whole diversity thing is the same thing?

Even the Muslims know this. As soon as you allow Sex Ed to be non-biological and increasingly political suddenly they’re telling your kid they need to be blacked to prove they’re not Hitler.

Love is love – thought-terminating cliche. Rape is not love. Victim blaming. Standard r-type gaslighting like what was the Rotherham girl wearing, maybe it was her choice etc.

Most pedos work in Sex Ed. Think about it. They get to travel the country talking to kids about sex. Who else would want that job? It’s grooming. Sex Ed has always been about grooming. Teen sex rates have gone up, the opposite promised.

https://newrepublic.com/article/120379/german-green-party-pedophilia-scandal

It’s not every day that a major European political party has to apologize for having supported pedophilia, but two weeks ago, the German Green Party had to do just that. For the past year and a half, investigators commissioned by the party have been probing its past associations with pro-pedophilia groups, and their report has been shocking to many Germans. It found that the German “pedosexual movement,” which advocated the legalization of “consensual” sex between adults and children, found a surprisingly warm reception in the party in the 1980s.  

There was also an active commune in the 70s but I misplaced the article.

Cultural Marxism obviously.

One popular reference point, both in West Germany and elsewhere, was the writings of Wilhelm Reich, a leftist Austrian psychiatrist who died in 1957. An influential pupil of Freud, Reich’s The Mass Psychology of Fascism argued that the rise of authoritarianism could be tied to the “suppression of the natural sexuality of the child.” And West Germany had another prominent symbol for the movement: an anarchist journalist named Peter Schult, who remained a figure of reverence on the left despite the fact that he openly described himself as a “pederast.” In 1976, he was convicted of bringing a young girl home with him with the intention of sexually abusing her.

“sexualisation of children” is a crime in our law, that’s grooming

Sex Ed is child abuse, according to the law.

Hate yourself for the global corporations (oikophobia)

Our? Rs are a minority. Considering the “Far” Left (current Left) mental illness rates, it could legitimately be considered a symptom of mental disease. Genophilia is perfectly natural and normal, statistically.

‘Oikophobia’: Our Western Self-Hatred

We used to just call them traitors and banish them to a colony. It works. You love foreigners so much? Live over there forever, no takebacksies.
Here’s a little secret: the more you love your country, the less you care about companies. To find the biggest globalist, find a guy covered head to toe in brands: iPhone, Beats, Nike etc. Brands are their family. Sad!
It’s a subversive replacement of patriarchy with a cold, hard, corporate cock.

Africans fell for it first, for that reason. No dad? Wear all the brands. ALL of them.

Gee, why are young people so into luxury brands? I guess they’re just vain. Why aren’t they having long family dinners? Where did their father abandon them to? Overtime? The bar? A second Kardashian type family? Neglect is abuse, Boomers!

Credit: Stop being a pleb

The airplane company had such a backlash for a simple reason.

Why do you think airlines are struggling to make sales?

Well, if your country is already flooded with foreigners, why travel?

There’s no lure, they’re not exotic. From experience, you know how entitled and unclean they are. Why spend all that money to be around more of them?

Socialists are the most capitalist people, but deluded about it, they replaced their own family with brands. Hollywood is one of many, look at the Harry Potter fandom for a prime example. Sip your slave-grown Starbucks slosh and tap into your nightmare screen made by suicidal slaves, while tweeting about the evils of slavery. Corporate cucks.

Short and tall women are slutty

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/147470490900700405
h/t Dutton

I wish they’d look racially, but this explains the r-selected LBFMs.

https://www.academia.edu/32121636/Height_among_Women_is_Curvilinearly_Related_to_Life_History_Strategy
Tall women I have noted, like Tilda Swinton seem to be left-wing in an openly aggressive, manly fashion.
Short women tend to be left-wing in a subversive fashion, i.e. infantilising rape gangs and cheating on their simp of a husband as a “poly”, the type to know they can’t play the tall woman’s game of leftism so fakes femininity to extract resources (from State, Church, simp). Assuming a short woman is more feminine is statistically wrong. She’ll be more likely to cheat from insecurity.

re Keller, M. (2013). The Genetic Correlation Between Height and IQ. PLOS ONE.
I already knew taller men are smarter and kinder to women, they’re protective. That’s why women like them, not the height per se.
Short men view women as social competition so are more likely to bully, gaslight, verbally abuse and hit them. They think domination makes up for lack of dominance. It’s moral cowardice, “pick on someone your own size” as they used to say.
Nature made taller men healthier because they’re generally better people.
Misogyny is a known factor of inferiority and most of them (with vitriol aimed in-race) are shorter than the women or average man, so subconsciously hate their mother.
Height in a man is broadly like a human’s peacock tail. It develops as a signal of genetic quality which cannot be faked and demonstrates low mutation load. There’s plenty of time before the growth plates fuse to get adequate nutrition and exercise so either their parents hate them (and parents hate more ugly children or products of other unions) or they are burdened with so many mutations it’s a small wonder they weren’t miscarried (and probably would have been without modern medicine).
One big reason modern humans are uglier is IVF, the other being maternal care for parents who simply don’t deserve it.
Read into that what you will.
Maybe the solution is more abortion, but more eugenic abortion.

Average height women have “more reproductive success” (Nettle, 2002) – cited top paper.
This also applies to the third world (they cite). Perhaps the fetish for pedomorphic women (short women, short limbs) is an r-select feature?
Men always prefer women a few inches shorter than them as a norm (so probably same class, assortative) but “markedly” short (as the paper puts it) is abnormal and suggests r-type breeding preferences (young and done, no investment).
Tall women are less symmetrical, although the way they write that sentence up is vague to spare blushes.
Medium height women have “highest mate value” – more studies needed on this. What does that actually mean? Just fertility? Beauty? Personality? IQ? What? Good family?
Jealous women were “taller or shorter than average” – damn, dare you to do a cross-racial study, that would be funny. 
So if you don’t want a harpy guys, select an average height woman (for her own race, presumably, also your own?).

If you wanna be cucked, women, marry a short man,

-or men, marry a short or tall woman.

Short is clearly a non sequitur to feminine, as it states short women are more jealous (along with tall women) of “feminine” beauty.

Average women are more repulsed by masculine women but… isn’t everyone? Can you guess my height by that?

I actually thought that was just everyone.

A few screencaps:

  • Humans are K-selected as a species, believe nobody who says otherwise. No, men are not meant to “sow oats”, it’s degenerate. The quality men don’t do that. Reputation evolved to explain this commentary on your genetic quality.
  • K-types are MORE reproductively successful in the long run, as you’d expect. Evolution is about the long run and who actually reproduces, not just “screws” in completely sterile fashion.
  • Married isn’t always better for the children if the parents (or one) are unstable, in loyalty or sanity.
  • Problem children come from problematic parents.
  • If your child is a slut, it’s your fault.
  • Sex is a physical distraction from growing up mentally, usually escaping from childhood trauma.
  • r/K isn’t really a choice, it’s mostly genetics. Posing as the other type won’t work.
  • 65% genetically heritable. Your kids will be just as slutty as you are, whoever you marry.
  • Hot women can hold out for marriage. Not – cannot.
  • Women are more than morally offended when you treat them as promiscuous (when they’re not) because you’re also calling them ugly.
  • If you want a spouse who can pair bond neurologically and raise your children as a good role model, don’t marry a former slut.
  • Better spouses are genetically fitter spouses (average women, tall men).

Snowflake psychology

learned helplessness, equally applies to both the SJW and the obsessive “MGTOW”

really it’s an excuse to do nothing

“I can’t try because…..”

Well, you can try to do something, they’re not holding you hostage in a tower.

But I don’t think any of those people are empaths, they just have the same false dichotomy that conveniently says they can watch porn/Netflix and waste time without personal loss. If anything they have low empathy, including for themselves and their own best interests. Self-destructive adult children ruining their own life.

Sure, maybe you can spite people beyond Going Galt… but…. why?

Like, sure, sabotage. Nobody is stopping you. But the world/society/white people are not your family.

Sin without forgiveness

Brilliant point, albeit put differently.

The SJW is destructive. This destruction of innocence, beauty and truth is of Biblical order.

The celebration of perversion, deviance, aggression and lies/delusion is Satanic.

Sin is temptation +weakness, on a personal level.

Forgiveness is from Christ, obviously they’d reject it with cultural marxist kafkatrapping.

Of course they would.

How they treat their fellow left opponents (because they’re not actually left, they’re anti-civilization) is how they want to treat all of us before we see what they are and treat them the same way. This is projection of how they believe they should be treated – old tribal banishment.

This is Marxist excommunication from the Party.

Let the fake Left eat the real Left – then WHO is left?

All your useful idiots are belong to us. You have to let them see the Marxist betrayal with their own eyes before they believe. Remember, ‘liberals get the bullet first’, they need to see this rhetoric in action with personal enaction from who they considered allies.

Enable your low time preference, you so-called conservathots.

What would Darwin do? Remember, their anti-evolution stance is our greatest ace, our predictions fare better.

If all we’re left to fight is the dregs of dysgenics, it’s an easy win. Shut up and let it happen. Strengthen your position. Stop trying to Captain Save a Ho this. You’re winning by doing nothing – enjoy it.

The MSM encourage your sudden reaction like a toxic IV. Don’t do it. Don’t feed the Beast. Disengage.

The past few years have been great for me. Vindication has cleared my skin, paid my bills and saved for my retirement. Times are sweet. But it isn’t enough that I should win, but that my nemesis suffers.

If you get involved, they have a third party to blame. Sit back and enjoy the show.

My sentiment on the tide against PC.

Diversity cannot guarantee obedience without threat. This is the next step.

Don’t be in the way trying to save the atheists.

pizzagate was a sham

there is obviously nothing to do with Satanism here

it makes me wonder if that Satanic panic in nurseries was onto something

Satanism isn’t a religion, it’s just anti-Christian.

As Vox said, they aren’t atheists, they’re misotheists. They direct their life to God, just hating him.

Black Masses involve two forms of worship over blasphemy – orgies (including rape) and cannibalism of innocents (babies, children, virgins). We know what they involve, Crowley also mentioned what was involved openly.

“the animal should therefore be killed” when they call humans animals, this is what they mean

Among other things, male pedophiles abusing boys. Is that gay?

“one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force, a male child of perfect innocence… sacrifices his creative power” [as does porn, another drain]

For people who go on about the power and right to their Will, they sure don’t want to be explored by outsiders or held responsible for their choices.

Satanists pervert the words of God. Those ‘points’ pervert Jesus’ teachings, they rely on your ignorance of the source like the SJWs who say ‘all things are possible’ when the FULL quote is “with God, all things are possible”. Their language is debased to push the cult of individualism, degenerate hedonism. Hedonism is Satanism, rebranded. Their version of weasel words like ‘respect’ is non-existent, there is no honour among thieves, no principles among sociopaths. They don’t have a conscience, they are shamed by nothing they do. The Pied Piper warned us about their siren songs of ‘fun’. Does a black ‘mass’ sound like freedom to you, or black tinged sheeple?

BAAAAAAAAAA, Satanists. BAAAAA and humbug.

This kinda apathy instilling trickiness (gaslighting, ‘we all think’…).

They are not deep and believe in nothing absolute. There is nothing there but druggy brainfog.

They believe in sin and no punishment, how convenient. Natural law doesn’t give a fuck about your feelings, there is no appeal. They’ll be shocked to learn hell is real. Even the indebted state cannot keep you safe from your consequences forever.

They aren’t supporting ACTIONS, they are getting you to agree with ALL acts in (((principle))) before specifyingdeception. If they said, for example, they have a ‘right’ to fuck corpses because ‘legally’ nobody owns them and pleasure>anything else, you’d be appalled. However, those principles are compatible with any evil acts. ANY.

Satan gets you to sell your soul before letting on what he’ll do with it. Goethe was a Freemason/Satanist.

Later, it’ll be:

What about muh freedom? But you said I was free to do as I will?”

Like a used car salesman adding on other shit after you’re sitting down. AND this AND that.

Conflation, obfuscation. Sargon naively assumes everyone has an above average IQ, a conscience and a limit. This is why the soft Left, all their plans and predictions fail. Where do you account for evil? What about the psychopaths, people with parts of humanity missing?

This is their ultimate outcome, carte blanche culture, aka call it consent and it’s okay! their game plan this whole time. Everything until this time was the warm-up.

‘Well, the corpse doesn’t refuse consent….’ – organ ‘donation’ and necrophilia, shit you’ll hear. Cos it isn’t graverobbing or rape unless they can say no, according to these people. Something’s never essentially wrong, morally bankrupt, evil, inhuman.

Do not FALL for Satanic taqiyya. They can say anything to recruit you.

There are four ultimate taboos of humanity: necrophilia, bestiality, pedophilia/rape, cannibalism. Anyone who attempts to justify or praise any of these is inhumane, a monster. Anyone who practises them is subhuman. Some people are born with a missing conscience, avoid them like the plague they are. When you can look at the case histories of various murderers over time, and know by default of the facts many of them were enabled, you can quickly ascertain why.

The consent thing re sex is gaslighting. Whatever happened to you, you must’ve wanted it, they say. We are told to have sympathy for the Devil, the Real Victim Here TM.

When in truth, the Devil has crocodile tears and enjoys shedding them.

Siding with criminals who violate human rights is the just world fallacy. If men, women and children ever ‘deserve’ to be raped then logically, so would all rich people ‘deserve’ to be burgled at gunpoint and happy people ‘deserve’ to be murdered. Taking people ‘down a peg’ is psychopathic sadism and the worst form of tall poppy syndrome. Being attractive is only a sin to insane people (Harrison Bergeron), God made humans healthy = attractive, to argue against this order is blasphemy. That is what blasphemy DOES. They’re amoral narcissists, using the words and knowing none of the meaning. They produce and sacrifice personally nothing – worthless people.

OT:

Why are real atheists so desperate to simulate faith?

Singularity – Rapture,

EMP – Revelations,

The Sims BS – your avatar body temple is God’s trinket box for a soul.

…..Why? They appeal quite seriously to miracles and demon entities (ETs) more than any Catholic I’ve ever heard. Irrespective of their feelings, calling God a programmer is actually the foundation of Creationist belief, the ‘intelligent design’ people are being ripped off by those who sneer at them. Pascal is laughing somewhere, call it a hologram if you wish to baby your own feelings.

The hippies are saying Oversoul – erm, that’s called God, we already have that thing.

They claim to have higher learning – from higher beings, they’re all Heaven-sent or deceivers.

They ‘meditate’ to their higher self – that’s a guardian angel or a prayer to Jesus (the humanity of the species embodied temporarily).

ETs are just a way to explain demons to idiots. White guys are uniquely gullible.

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/

Obviously they’ll lie about their origins, obviously. Why take an interest in hairless monkeys? We are important – to God.

e.g. If people want to make the argument that the demons of classical exorcisms were people with massive mental disorders, then fine – it’s a terrible explanation for traditional reports of levitation, et cetera, but the Catholic Church is a propaganda matrix anyway, so this will merely be a side note.

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/cienciareal/cienciareal55.htm

In a neat little bow. I used to believe it too.

Incredulity can dismiss everything, eh reddit?