Sex Bias in the US Code 1977

Snopes link a suspicious dead end.

https://www2.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/usccr/documents/cr12se9.pdf

But the Left loves women, it just wants them to have no legal recourse to the “she consented” lie of rapists (before DNA it was ‘I never touched her’). Because all women are presumed hookers and have no right to refuse, according to the likes of Ginsburg. Libel of a whole sex.

(This also applies to men and children).

If you want to track when the 50s high trust society died, this document


There is no libertarian argument for prostitution because if you can buy a person (as long as you call yourself a ‘customer’ – renting, or ‘pimp’ – owner/master), the Government already owns you and can therefore order you to do things as your pimp. Anything. The trauma, drug addiction and suicide outcomes of prostitutes prove it is to be discouraged severely on a medical level. 

This claims to be all about “opportunity” (p.102 on the doc, p.109 digital) but the purpose of the law is protection against predators.
If it doesn’t do that, it’s invalid rule.

Monsters wanting to remove the shackles of legal consequences from other monsters.

The law doesn’t give you rights, merely enforces them, we have natural rights.

To claim otherwise is to dub women or whoever else less than human. Only non-human animals can be owned (or rented), so arguments for prostitution (rich people rape) are actually anti-Darwin.

Men who think to defend this don’t realize, rape of men happens all the time. Even prisoners of war are usually forced to watch the rape of others before it’s their turn. Most rapists make absolutely no distinction between male and female, young or very old, you must assume you are next in these acts of precedent. Because you are.

Serial rapists happily rape the disabled, elderly, babies… dogs….

you think they’ll care you have a dick?

inb4 “there’s nothing wrong with it”

Plus, if you had a son, would you like your son to be a prostitute?

early p.98 is funny because it’s such a strawman

  • spending money isn’t illegal
  • spending stolen money is – because it’s stolen
  • sex isn’t illegal
  • buying/renting a human is illegal, whatever the purpose*

Don’t play dumb, scum.

According to B, as an owned human in a “prostitution” ring, they’re already kidnapped. Anything that happens to them …is already illegal.

Sex isn’t illegal. Raping a (sex*) slave is illegal.

Paying their owner isn’t less illegal.

And furthermore, it’s a market exchange – using public currency.

Totally the Government’s (and Tax Man’s) purview.

Predators rely on feminine kindness

Bird with a broken wing. Logically, he’d go into the shop.

Why stand around and wait for a young woman?

At a shop teenage girls visit!

Why aren’t women nice to strangers?
Here’s the answer.

Women shouldn’t be expected to “help” random men anyway, we’re generally ill-equipped.

Note how he tried to invert the damsel thing?

And Milgram’s appeal to authority. Don’t trust a uniform. You can buy Halloween costumes off ebay.

“I need you to” not without a lawyer, creep. Note the use of PUA type pressure? Need? Bullshit. Want.

This is from the “I need to use the photocopier” persuasion study.

If you feel bad saying no and endangered saying yes, say no!

Guilt can be wrong!

Her first mistake was waving instead of using that horn.

One loooooooong car horn and he’d have run.

Innocent people don’t run.

Women have been going missing for a long time

Nowadays, we’d call it trafficking/slavery.

Back then, they pretended it didn’t exist. To protect powerful men. So male privilege did exist, just rich male privilege.

I’d love to have Q or something like it open up these old cases and expose what really happened.

Vindicate Humiston, for one thing. It would draw a lot of normies’ attention.

It feels like recent history is Swiss cheese, giving people answers is a proof without being sued because all the culprits are now dead. There is no reason NOT to release this and I’ll be disappointed if there’s no review of history given present gatherings.

They always call people a crank if they’re onto something. Journalists gaslight and slander all the time. If you notice anything true, you’re just mad or hysterical or crazy or deluded. …No.

This was like a one-woman chan, it’s amazing.

I wonder who that could be

https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/11/todays-blind-items-state-protection.html

Here is a 1000 word essay:

Henry Cavill leaving Chateau Marmont in West Hollywood, CA.

You don’t become Superman without a super-bleached anus.

A lot of his gay past was deleted from the internet, including living with gay guys.
And he’s oddly paranoid about being accused of rape…. that isn’t normal.

I can’t wait for the arrest of Hilton.

I might actually cry tears of joy.

Yes it is

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/08/14/harvey-weinstein-sex-trafficking-lawsuit-can-proceed-judge-rules.html
“Weinstein claimed through his lawyers that letting the lawsuit proceed to trial means sex trafficking laws now cover all sexual activity between adults when one person holds power and influence over the other.”
Yes? And?
Tears of a psychopath.

What is holds there? Define holds? They’re so stupid they trip themselves up in their own defense. Threat of punishment however vague (inc. stonewalling and other emotional abuse) or doing the (things) anyway is rape. You’d have to lack a conscience not to get this. That isn’t really asking, that’s telling. Telling someone how to use their body (an ownership right) is trafficking. 

Sounds awfully like a whip hand, a master and a slave dynamic. That is illegal.
For any employer to induce illegal activities (workplaces don’t allow relationships) would be.
When you use the “power” to get the “sex”, that is trafficking. That is all they do!
There are rapists who use their “power” of intimidation to receive “sex” in an alley… was that consensual?

Do plush settings suddenly mean a person is magically free of the risk of harm?

Does their No hold more weight?

What did you enjoy doing to the women who told you No?

Sexual sadism is not legal, you subhuman monster.

A person who is not totally free to say no and have that respected is a slave, they cannot truly say yes either. Coercion means any consent later given is under duress – it doesn’t count! This even applies to contracts (not that your NDAs apply to illegal activities).

This has been part of the law since the Vikings, they couldn’t even kiss a woman unless it was a raid (war). If you won’t respect boundaries, where’s the consent in crossing them? And consenting to something doesn’t make it socially acceptable, you nutbar. Pretending you’re just too damn irresistible fools no one. The expected response is always No. Otherwise, I can dip into your bank account, and just assume you’re okay with it.

A person’s livelihood is how they stay alive and it’s the thing slave-owners “held” over their captives.

You’ll notice rapists like to lie about rape law. Wonder why!

And no, the “freeze” response of the nervous system, common to terrified women and children, is not consent. Actually, it’s a sign to stop and back off. Humans use their words and there’s no excuse not to. Ironically, the word “frigid” just captures that evolved response to other predators e.g. ones that hunt by motion, like a sabretooth tiger. Consent can never, ever be presumed. PTSD soldiers go frigid when thinking of battle, that’s the level.

Passivity isn’t consent or an empty house is “asking for it”. Women and children know they cannot fight off an attack, so they freeze. This is biological fact. It doesn’t “mean” anything but that. Victim blaming people for having a nervous system?

This reminds me of the weird American loophole that allows cops to rape their detained suspects, and later say it was consensual. See the part about consent =/= ethical? There should be a law that while at work you can’t “have sex with” someone, even if they’re wearing handcuffs. Passively.

You can’t drink beer, sexual matters should be off the table too. In a civilized society. Everything else aside, the power imbalance makes consent impossible. One party literally has a gun.

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/evbvem/two-cops-got-charged-with-rape-after-a-teens-desperate-public-plea

“oral sodomy” too, quite a term