Everybody’s Business is Nobody’s Business by Daniel Defoe

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2052/2052-h/2052-h.htm

This is amazing.

If she be tolerably handsome, and has any share of cunning, the apprentice or her master’s son is enticed away and ruined by her.  Thus many good families are impoverished and disgraced by these pert sluts, who, taking the advantage of a young man’s simplicity and unruly desires, draw many heedless youths, nay, some of good estates, into their snares; and of this we have but too many instances.

Yes, the poor young men.

Knowing that Defoe wrote the phrase “pert sluts” intentionally gives me life.

It’s like one gigantic rant, I’m serious.

Some more artful shall conceal their condition, and palm themselves off on young fellows for gentlewomen and great fortunes.  How many families have been ruined by these ladies?

That’s a good point, we have too many pert sluts passing themselves off as ladies, and the male equivalents.

when the father or master of the family, preferring the flirting airs of a young prinked up strumpet, to the artless sincerity of a plain, grave, and good wife, has given his desires aloose, and destroyed soul, body, family, and estate.  But they are very favourable if they wheedle nobody into matrimony, but only make a present of a small live creature, no bigger than a bastard, to some of the family, no matter who gets it; when a child is born it must be kept.

Men are dumb.

This is how the r-genes spread.

Adultery is a mortal sin because it reduces the fitness of your legitimate children, that you owe the duty to (and nobody else has to pick up after). The money that goes on the bastard should be invested in your real spawn. You owe no religious, moral duty to the children of a mother you never married (when the oath for the duty is sworn and signed). In purely religious terms, the marital union is the only place of obligation, above anything else.

This acceptance of bastards would explain how aristocracy becomes decadent – the genes come from adultery.

Notice: it’s a class thing, he is equally enraged by the follies of men behaving below their station.

The Romans had a law called Jus Trium Liberorum, by which every man who had been a father of three children, had particular honours and privileges.  This incited the youth to quit a dissolute single life and become fathers of families, to the support and glory of the empire.

Slutty men made the modern world

False reasoning, correct conclusions.

[shitposty]

All that shit on hypergamy (science definition, not internet) is missing one thing: modern evidence.
That isn’t what alpha means in evolutionary terms.
Stop trusting everything you read on families and women by middle-aged bachelor men. You didn’t even mention player burnout.

http://www.socialmatter.net/2018/03/27/sexual-dynamics-average-partner-numbers-are-gender-identical/

Read from “But this is where the adding up constraint comes in. Like the asymmetry between sperm and eggs, the adding up constraint is not a principle of ethics, but a principle of biology (and, in this case, mathematics).” and it’s pretty much solid.

Prior to that it’s bait.

“In other words, a lot of the thinking about “game” came from men who had an inherently ambivalent attitude towards modern sexual mores. ”

Degenerates.

While bemoaning the decline of modern women into widespread sluttiness, these men were contributing themselves quite considerably to exactly the same phenomenon they complained about.

I don’t mean this as a matter of ethical judgment, that they were ethically equivalent.”

They are literally.

They’re massive hypocrites.

Moral authority = 0.

That’s why even SJWs call them losers, they see that.

What sort of red pill is it when naturalistic fallacy of an extreme, unreal (Calhoun) primitive situation takes over and you can P=NP that slutting is bad, but only for half of society? Like you can only ruin half a society?

No, adults are responsible for antisocial behaviours and promiscuity is topping the list of self-destructive options. Men don’t get a “I made a mistake!” line. Years of something is not a mistake.

Look at this paragraph before where I said to read for a prime example of why not to pollute your brain with it.

“women will tend to have a mixed attitude to a man’s sexual past.”

They don’t know many women, do they?
I know plenty of men who’d dispute that too. Then why are the sluts always getting rejected (by almost all women they “approach”) and “flaked on” (polite ones who thought they’d take a hint).

No, they don’t. They care a whole lot but “men are scared women will laugh at them, women are scared men will kill them”. They won’t tell you unless it’s under lab conditions, with a lie detector. Where are the studies that male promiscuity is sexually selected or socially preferred, respected between other men?
They don’t exist, they’re making it up. Male promiscuity is a woefully under-studied trait. I’d love to see those studies. The loyal reject the disloyal of their own sex in women, this should also hold true for men since humans are a social species and rely on loyalty to survive. Adultery was shameful in both sexes as you breached your vow to the tribe and society. Can you trust someone who’d cheat on a spouse, in business?
False paternity is exceedingly rare and that’s another thing they lie about (and implies low to no sexual selection of manwhores). I’m sure they rank high in the aborted figures, though. Study those too!

Studies tend to survey teenagers, with immature brains. In long term mating (breeding, evolutionary) studies with adults, women prefer conscientious mates (the exact opposite). They reject Dark Triad (the psychopathy and narcissism mostly). Of what data already exists.

https://www.livescience.com/17003-conscientious-men-dancers.html

We can even see it in the way they move. That’s evolved.

We need more studies on male traits and their attraction or repulsion mechanisms. Oh, but it might hurt someone’s snowflake feelings so don’t hold your breath.

“Sleeping with a lot of women contemporaneously is an abandonment risk, but it is also a sign of higher mate quality,

desperation is not quality, evidence?
and social popularity is not sluttiness, a Sexual Revolution lie

having been pre-selected by lots of other women.

internet made yet another thing up again, citation?

Hence the female romantic ideal is the “reformed bad boy”. Ask them yourself. They’ll tell you.”

No, we don’t? Hollywood isn’t real. It’s a minority of either sex that sleep around at college. That is totally dead wrong. Only a coddled American could think this narrow view of some sections of privileged campuses applies to an entire sex through all cultures and times.
Citation? Not anecdotes you made up. Citations. I keep asking but there are never any good studies on these supposed “well-known facts”. And as we know from criminal studies, there is no such thing as reformation. Does like attract like? Yes. Bad women attract bad men by each’s insecurities but they are not the bulk of the population.

A study would refute this sexual propaganda but good luck getting a study like that published.

Men allowed the Sexual Revolution, take your lumps.

Back to article.

Because the adding up constraint, when reduced to its simplest and crudest form, presents a societal tradeoff that I suspect many in the manosphere would find rather discomforting. Namely:

A society that lets you sleep with lots of women will inevitably be one where the women you are sleeping with have themselves slept with lots of men.

That’s it. There’s no way around it.

Actions have consequences, really?

You make a bed and lie in it, really?

Entitlement is toxic, really?

Indeed, it shares a fair amount of the same wishful thinking of women sleeping around with lots of bad boys in their 20s, and then waiting until their 30s to wonder where all the good men have gone. The manosphere loves to laugh at this female delusion, and they’re right to do so.

When do the men of their age group want to marry them?
Did ya ask them that? No, of course not….

But how many of them apply the same iron logic to the similarly ridiculous situation of a man bedding dozens of women, while also complaining about the difficulty of finding a virgin to marry?

What is it with Americans and age 30 it’s like you’re obsessed.

Why would the good girls choose a burned-out STD-riddled husk of a man? You tell me. Using their peak years and being some loser’s last resort. Why.

I’ve said it for years, no, none of you. You cannot Have it All. It’s a myth to sell you things when you’re desperate. You are either a short term investment and attract other sluts or you’re a long term investment. They are mutually exclusive in trait, you can’t feign a different character. You can’t have your virgin cake and fuck it.

One group will be attracted for the same reason another is repulsed. e.g.

You know, the true sign of a desirable man is one who wants to prevent women from exercising the choice to reject him.

And this woman: “He was upset i wasnt a virgin because he met me at church. I was just like ‘dude, you dont deserve a virgin'”

Fucking LOL. Maybe he had a moodboard.

Double standards kill marriages. Stay in your lane, don’t expect better than your league. The manosphere tells you with a certain number of tricks (for a reasonable fee) you can play in every league. This has never been true in human history, look up assortative mating. They don’t tell you most evolution (the good stuff) and twist what little filters in.

They howl if you tell them things that make them feelbad e.g. women care about looks? Men hit the Wall around the same range as women, on average? Divorced men lose value compared to ones who didn’t fail to keep a marriage? Women don’t really like beards? Fat in a man is worse than a woman, since women need fat for pregnancy?

The manosphere has allowed the embittered divorced guys who stick around to ruin the young ones…. exactly what the SJWs do with women.

In most of those boxes, the couple should get divorced (ideally, never married). Bad people aren’t good enough for marriage and shouldn’t be allowed. They shouldn’t be selected, that’s a good system.

You can’t lecture women from a position of zero moral authority.

We’ll just laugh at you.

“There’s a set of men who don’t sleep around, by choice, and also want like minded partners. [k]

There’s a set of men who do sleep around, and don’t care if their partner does/doesn’t/may actively prefer girls who have. [r]

There’s a set of men who sleep around, but then will reject girls if they’ve behaved in a manner similar to them. [r]

There’s also a set of men who don’t sleep around, but not by choice, and who then shame people who do sleep around (despite the fact that, were they able to, they’d do the same). [r]

The latter two groups falls into the hypocrite category.”

Nailed it. But only the first has moral authority to do any lecturing.

“But it helps to be the Ottoman Sultan.” Yes, let’s model ourselves on men so attractive they had to trap women as slaves and rape them on pain of death.

“But it helps to be Cinderella.” Not the same. Never real, for one. And the K-selection of European royalty is earned, contrary to modern beliefs. [exception Harry]

They all think they’re the exception. Broflakes.

“For society as a whole, it simply cannot add up.” Maths frightens them.

“For traditionalists, the choice is clear. They would prefer both men and women to marry as virgins, and stay faithful to each other.” Pair bonding is real. It’s a feature of an undamaged brain. You prove to me male sluts don’t have equally damaged pair bonding to females ones (the positive claim, burden of proof) and I’ll eat my hat.

“But the world in which each woman sleeps with only one man is also the world in which each man sleeps with only one woman.” Not a bad thing if you love that person, it’s only torture to an r-type.

Okay, fuck goats, like the harem-lovers of the world.

“Out of all the pretty lies to abandon, the most important are the ones you yourself most want to believe are true.”

No remorse, no marriage potential. They’re so easy to spot.

I wonder if you studied the strident members of the Pussy Parade for ED…

http://drlwilson.com/Articles/SEXUAL%20PROBLEMS.htm

I think we could guess the result. Impotence, from psychiatric or physiological causes.

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/more-sexual-partners-unhappy-marriage_n_5698440

According to researchers, the 23 percent of participants who only had sex with their spouse prior to getting hitched reported higher quality marriages versus those who had other past sexual partners as well.

Fuck around and your marriage, if you even get a spouse, will suck.

Puts all the bitter divorced dudes into perspective, dunnit?

Now study male satisfaction specifically. Until then, you cannot make positive claims about it. Don’t men deserve this information before they make plans on false assumptions?

“I would be very surprised if having multiple sexual partners before marriage, independent of any other factor, has a direct causal influence.” It’s hard to get these real studies published and impossible to find male studies. You cannot comment on something that hasn’t been properly studied.

It wouldn’t be surprising at all, it would be a biological change of some sort.

“McNulty also points out that though the authors are respected researchers, the study was not reported by an academic journal nor was it peer-reviewed.” Good luck getting it published.

How can anything be meaningless?

In the act of attributing it with a label, it becomes meaningful.

http://uncabob.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/charming-people-as-addicts.html

I came to the conclusion years ago that “sexual addiction” is just a way for the person to make themselves feel good. Their baseline emotional state must be way below normal for them to do the things they do to make themselves feel better.

It’s called an arousal threshold.

It’s a given that many addicts lose their conscience. That’s why they use and manipulate people, although it may take years for them to realize that.

Predators, they come in more than the sexual variety. Social leeches, narcissistic supply.

Psychopaths have a variable youth and after around 33-36, their life plummets.

This society tells us liars must have some secret redeeming quality – brainwashing.

My experience has been that both cads and sluts are cowards. My cad acquaintance and one of his “girlfriends” once walked by a guy who said, “Your chick’s ugly.” The cad said nothing and kept walking.

Like a little bitch.

Wolf in sheep’s clothing, they only pick on those that can’t honestly oppose them, an equal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_arousal_theory

Relates to the amygdala. The hollow people.

http://uncabob.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/leftists-are-emotionally-four-years-old.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neophile

“A distaste or downright loathing of tradition, repetition, and routine”

Totally naive Id-brained, id for idiots.

I do know leftists are about four years old emotionally, because they blame all their problems on other people. It’s called projection, which is the fancy psychiatric term for scapegoating.

fair cop

The biggest red flag to identify a leftist is when they use the word “hate” all the time, which they apply to anyone who disagrees with them. It’s their own hate they are projecting. The Southern Poverty Law Center is as close to a perfect example of this dynamic.

Mostly the right wing wanna be left alone, that’s a right.
We don’t rely on other people for supply or gibs.

The first defense people engage in is projection. Apparently it runs back to our being infants, if researchers are right.

Hypoagency, common to pajama boys everywhere.

They take the blame for things as a ruse, as a group, never individually.

Skewered spectacularly here:

Without the group, they slink off. How dare you ask them to make amends?
Isn’t admitting human fault enough, they argue?

http://redpanels.com/120/

I dream of a world where redpanels is in the paper.

Leftist politics does not unite; it divides, because it encourages each special-interest group to blame its problems on someone else.

gaslighting

What that results in is conflict, not harmony.

Chaos is a ladder, of gibs.

More groups, more gibs to be gibbed.

The Fed is a magic money tree (true) and we need as many people as possible shaking it.

those who tap into this defense can manipulate people.

triangulation

common to schoolgirls everywhere

The masses will always fall for it. The masses – herds of people – don’t think. In fact they can’t think. Only individuals think.

groupthink is a cult

cults are impossible without it

Whenever I see a charismatic person I never believe what he says.

Yeah, sure, we’ll die on Mars.

Ladies first.

 These kind of manipulative, charismatic people can actually cast a spell on the masses (“spell” means the use of words).

Seduction is still a crime, bring back enforcement. We still have misrepresentation, defamation, related ones.

http://uncabob.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/sex-as-meaning-nothing.html

Each of these girls was extremely promiscuous, and I do not think they were capable of love. I wonder if there is a inverse relationship between promiscuity and love?

Yes, the former permanently erodes pair bonding. Even if they force themselves to get married, they fuck it up. The same thing that makes them manwhores/sluts makes them fuck-ups in general, even at work and other totally non-sexual things. Middle age is painful, old age is not kind to them.

They know they are responsible deep down because when nobody is looking, they can make good decisions. But admitting they’re wrong means they need to give up Goodies and that’s a No No to baby.

They fear deprivation, and therefore make their entire life deprived.

One question I have never been able to answer is, where do you draw the line? What is the upper limit on sex partners? I do know that devoting your life to physical pleasure will destroy you. That’s been noticed as far back as the ancient Greeks.

“Bread,” if it means anything, means materialism. Such materialism includes food, money, drink, sex. Pleasure. No one can make such things the meanings of their lives, such as epicures try to do. Ultimately, and generally quickly, it leads to a degraded life.

The most miserable people you’ll ever meet claim to be hedonists. Save time, say you’re depressed.

How can there be any such thing as a hedonist? There is no healthy person that doesn’t enjoy things.

Your genitals do not make you special.

The jollies, whatever their form, are self-medicating. Nothing to admire/be proud of.

The only thing I can say with any certainty is that the more sexually promiscuous someone is, the more difficulty they will have in maintaining a long-term romantic relationship.

Lust gets stronger the more you feed it. Chemically, we can test it in your blood, testosterone goes up, the more you fuck. The more you do it, the more you feel you need. In our evolution, you wouldn’t have the opportunity to experience player burnout. These people cannot be satisfied, and there are studies connecting promiscuity with inability to be satisfied (a type of impotence).

Also divorce risk with the resentment of, you guessed it, blaming the other spouse.

The original meaning of the Greek word “daemon” (perverted into the word “demon”) was a natural function that took over one’s life, be it sex or food or alcohol. It appears when one gets taken over by a daemon, not much of the personality is left for anything else. Such is the nature of addiction.

Satyrs are the most craven, worthless things in mythology.

http://uncabob.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/comic-books-and-loss-of-chivalry.html

all the rest of the comic book heroes were chivalrous. That’s why they were superheroes – at core knights with superpowers.

But not so much anymore. Superman has now given up his U.S. citizenship and is supposedly a citizen of the world – a demented, indeed perverted, fantasy if there ever was one. Whatever happened to Truth, Justice and the American Way?

What America?

You can’t find one American man handsome enough to play Superman.

And you complain about the casting of WW?

It’s about protecting the weak and helpless,

the good weak, the good but helpless – people forget this

A bad person claiming victim still doesn’t merit a heroic rescue.

You played yourself. If we punched the cause, we’d be punching you.

I find it interesting the South evolved from Celtic warrior culture, while the North was dominated by merchants who put money-making above everything

No comment.

When boys and girls have poor models, mentors and mirrors, they’re going imitate degraded values and grow up confused. It’s not hard to see that today, what with chivalry and Christianity both on life support.

If kids could just “make up their own mind” as atheists say in bad faith, we could leave them in the forest to build a better society.

There is no secret inner wisdom in wanting to eat pancakes until you puke.

Though it is quite funny watching their puke make swirly colours.

Leftists think human nature doesn’t exist and people aren’t much more than Lockean blank slates.

That’s called stupid, you can’t fix it.

Gamergate was about these Grundy types trying to eliminate the concept of male heroism, I discussed Superman previously.

Mixed schooling makes the problem worse, they’re becoming androgynous.

The idea this all has in common, they wanna kill? The West is best.

http://uncabob.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/never-let-anyone-tell-your-story-for-you.html

“if you do, they will destroy your culture. They will destroy the myths and rites and rituals that hold it together. They’ll destroy your community, and the meaning and importance that supports it.”

No, they’ll destroy your men with bread and circuses, clubs and brothels. The women follow, then the kids.

He gave to me as an example the fact the book listed how many Japanese were interned in the U.S. during WWII, and how many Jews were supposedly killed in every country in Europe, but did not list how many Americans were killed in the War between the States, World War I, World War II, or Vietnam.

Don’t omit data.

Signs of a traitor.

The Asians seem to be rebelling now against whites in America. The same people who have a long history of torture, especially of animals or prisoners.

Respectful culture, you really believe that line?

A person who claims to be your friend as he positions himself to stab you in the back is hardly honourable.

Japan’s elderly are so entitled they are literally killing their country.

White people aren’t the only ones with flaws, weebs.

I decided years ago the way to destroy a culture is to take over education, the government, the media, and the churches, and attack the dominant culture. Bit by bit it can be destroyed. It’s letting your enemies tell your story for you. And without stories about themselves, and a history, they are really no people at all.

Cathedral. CM.

Rootless materialists.

Hollywood is home to every possible imaginable perversion.

Hollywood will fail as soon as you make it pays its taxes! That’s it! One thing!

The culture that D.C. wishes to impose on America is one in which everyone is “patriotic” and supports its endless wars to “improve” the world. I am reminded of the sayings of both Jesus and Aesop: all tyrants call themselves benefactors.

Unfortunately, whatever passes for “Walt Disney” these days allowed a convicted pedophile to direct a creepy little film, Powder, which contained scenes of half-naked, muscular, hairless teenage boys showering together

Yeah MeToo had plenty of men being brave but the manosphere doesn’t like unpleasant questions.

If the Hollywood cucks (watching your spouse fuck at an orgy is the worst) had to live in real America, they’d kill themselves. No shiny distractions or ego boosters.

This is why they threatened to leave for Canada, the current leader makes it look more fun.

They view nations as clubs. They’re always welcome. Just make celebs pay their taxes, if they’re so normal.

And no one who opposes gun ownership is allowed armed guards. Hoist them by their own petard. Make it so they own their guards’ guns and it’s public information.

I remember one celebrity sticking his head up his arse deeper.

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/jan/20/firearms-company-para-usa-liam-neeson-gun-control

Then give back the money, bitch!

Get this – being Irish, he almost certainly supports the IRA, white terrorists who attacked women and children, happily. With guns and worse.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/liam-neeson-danger-becoming-ira-5558532

Find anyone in D.C., or Hollywood, or any grade school, middle school, high school, or college, who knows about this committee. You will find only a handful.

It takes a lot of education, to become that ignorant.

Americans are lifelong debt slaves to buy their own brainwashing, wow.

Berry also said, “We’d be nothing without stories.” He’s right about that. It reminds me of something Ray Bradbury said: “Metaphors are the center of life.” Any story that truly resonates with us has to be metaphorical, which is essentially the manipulation of images.

Everyone needs myths to live by.

The false myths of PC will destroy your life and society over time.

Think of mud sharks getting beaten to death.

Apple worship has replaced Jesus.
Elon is a vying contender.

Except if he succeeds, he’d deserve to be admired.

Hedonism (materialism) isn’t a life philosophy, it’s a suicide note.

Culture is genetic. Culture comes from people and those differences are innate.

This (always non-existent) Utopia will never happen, because people with other cultures, in other countries, don’t want foreigners telling their stories for them, and trying to destroy their myths, and impose other, unwanted ones on them. The U.S. government is trying that today. and before them, for some 300 years, the British.

Yes, it was foolish and wrong then too.

Colonialism simply weakens your people at home. Waste of resources.

Conspiracists attribute to conspiracy what the Bible attributes to God: omniscience and omnipotence. Anyone who believes that will end up with warped brains. And obviously conspiracists were babbling about everything being a conspiracy thousands of years ago.

Do you believe in an elite? Do you believe they’re good people? Is there proof they’re screwing you?

It’s stereo-typically gossip motivated by envy. It might be true, but most gossip is fake news.

Yes, fake news.

Triangles are not a symbol of a cult, as much as a natural feature of geometry.

We can give humans way too much credit. We read intent into nature and the nature of stupidity.

-isms are the new poltergeist.

Conspiracies work because powerful roles select for crazy sneaky bastards.

The modern obsession with purging applies to diets over sex lives, and thought policing over the law.

God didn’t cause this so it must be other people! People can be fixed! People must be fixed!

they give people evil qualities that they cannot possess, only demons and monsters.

An unusually naive comment. Watch a Ted Bundy interview, monsters are real. He is likeable but only when not in a position (free) to harm you, like admiring a tiger in a zoo. Modern people refuse evil because then they’d need to deal with it, compounded by the knowledge modern society allows them more freedom than ever before.

Charismatic authority should be suspect. This isn’t paranoid but empirical.

All it takes is one drop of poison to kill you, one domino to harm society.

It diverts attention from a bloated military out of control, a world-spanning empire, crushing debt and taxes, the middle-class being outsourced…onto people trying to prove ludicrous fantasies about remote-controlled airplanes and explosives in buildings.

What if the theory is about those real issues?

A comment from another article

As you are well aware, civilization is largely a social construct based on the honor system. It only takes one person acting in self interest to fuck it up for everyone else. I can envision being actively involved pioneering a new civilization after some form of apocalyptic event, but to save this one?
“Tis better to contribute to the fall of that which is already wavering and belongs to yesterday’s world than to try to prop it up and prolong its existence artificially.” -Julius Evola, Ride The Tiger

Reading through uncabob’s posts, I really miss the guy.

Wise man.

I’ll be linking to some of his old posts from time to time.

Re-watching Fight Club

The Riot Club was less on-the-nose.

Disclaimer: probably shit opinions, I am no cinephile.
It’s a cult classic but what is its cultural value now, almost twenty years later?

I still like the film but I see things in it recently I cannot ignore.
I can’t fully love it anymore. This, in spite of Peak Pitt.

TLDR: You go, emo guy!
Kinda like 500 Days of Summer but if Tom was gay and masochistic.

Also, does it piss anyone else off that Tom learned nothing at the end of that?
Is it supposed to piss me off? Well, it does. Nine years later.

Fight Club is a satire of rebellion. It’s completely safe. Even the punching has no real risk of death or serious injury. They become more drone-like in a combination of terror cell, monastery and military, but they’re too chickenshit to actually risk being shot at. They’re cowards hiding in versions of masculinity that never existed. Men didn’t go around punching a tiger to death, they raised a family. None of them do.

Imagine if (spoiler)

 

Tyler were real but Marla Singer were the imaginary one?

Imagine how much more sense that movie would make.

That’s the best theory I have. If you didn’t bring a cup of tea, you can leave on that thought. I won’t expand much on it because it is perf.

Are we ready? O.K. Pointing-out similar to The Last Psychiatrist, for time.

As it is, the control the narrator has is an illusion. The house wouldn’t exist, it’s very 90s, like the Friends apartment. There’s no way anyone involved could afford that apartment and the literal mansion wouldn’t be vacated, but it might, however, hold the Narrator’s delusions of grandeur.
He hates bosses so much he becomes a Mafia boss.
He is a sadist that enjoys listening to the pain and suffering of others. Support groups for male cancer, what a sick fuck.
He hates himself but has no self, no purpose in society.
He feels useless because he is useless.
He contributes nothing to the world that couldn’t be automated in future.
He has middle-class problems because, sorry, poor people don’t shop at Ikea.
It’s a teenage boy’s idea of rebelling, you all live in a commune (political, yes, it’s a commune) and hit your feelings out.
Er, you’re still expressing your emotions in a safe environment. It’s therapy.
You could just have got a gym sub and taken up boxing. – things a woman would say
Ah, but then he might be defeated. This is key. The Narrator refuses to take risks or they magically pay off.
He’s a Gary Stu, everything makes him more powerful and works out. For example, he isn’t caught stealing human tissue, which requires permits. There’s no regulation of his ingredients. Taxes aren’t mentioned. Now I’ve seen the tax thing, it looks like a missed opportunity for a monologue.
The locals would notice a building full of skinheads making a racket, come on.
He survives more shit than Jesus but says edgy macho tough guy stuff that would Schwarzenegger blush at how cliche and 80s it is. The fact he looks incapable of lifting an especially heavy bucket with that stringy figure makes this remarkable. He looks about 15 but talks tough. He threatens to shoot people and nobody reports him.
Really?


Look up the personality traits of male borderlines.

Marla has the female version, they’re not soulmates; they’re both crazy.
Narrator clearly has anhedonia, but only in the beginning. He isn’t an insomniac. Yet his anhedonia magically switches off in the antisocial kind to become a leader (because you can just up and decide one day) and the sexual kind (that isn’t how libido works). The guy works all hours of the week and has energy to make a toddler jealous?
It’s a parody of a revenge fantasy. The Matrix worked because it was sci-fi, the robots aren’t real either. The world knows it’s fake. The Fight Club universe doesn’t know how fake it is.
They claim to know but not a single person acts uniquely. Narrator sells shit and talks shit to hit other men.
It’s not about the women. It’s never about the women. The only woman we see is also batshit.
Where are the women? Kids? Where are the normies? Where are the happy people he hates so bad?
It’s his jealousy of other men. Wait, envy. Envy of other men. Real men. Men that are living in his head (the Cave Man as a false God of pagan freedom) and he doesn’t care if they never existed (fantasy prone but if the concept is impossible, he should care).

https://namimc.org/male-borderline-personality-disorder-know/

Complaining constantly about hypothetical abandonment is the ticker. He makes no effort to keep people in his life and secretly believes them inferior. That isn’t self-loathing, more a feature of narcissism (inferiority complex).

“Other males will “scare” their spouses away with their quick tempers, argumentativeness, and sometimes even physical aggression. An interaction with a male with BPD may include the individual saying any and everything to trigger their spouse’s anger.”

They’re not heroes, they’re the bad guys.
BPDs are a big ball of emotion. In women, it becomes internal. In men, they’re too grandiose to commit suicide so they take revenge on the world, a lot like psychopaths. They value nothing and lie to the contrary. What does the Narrator value? Only himself. Nothing else. He stands for nothing else. It’s a brittle figure of strength.
The control freak aspect is externalized. Narrator does nothing. The money he makes isn’t saved like a normal person with a brain, he spends all his time talking to himself (was Tyler’s plane seat occupied by a terrified person?) and if he can’t be happy, he’s such an omega he would rather take the whole world down with him (Savior complex) than watch someone else be happy (common in narcissism, envy triggers rage outbursts but BPDs can have rage episodes and violence triggered by envy of the happy too). If they can’t be balanced, they’ll fuck with your head too. That’s where gaslighting comes in. Narrator does indoctrinate Mayhem members like a cult.
“I’m the only one who’d have you” type of lines. Faking the moral high ground as a cover for their double standards.
Stonewalling and random requests of assistance.
BPDs can’t self-soothe, they are the original attention whores.
Narrator hates the world but responds to this by spending more time in it? Makes no sense.


Re-watching this film and actually thinking from his position, it’s insane. There’s a snowflake attachment to reality, where he expects it should be designed for him (well, that’s capitalist, so it is).

Sorry God/Daddy let you down. Setting things on fire and thinking you’re a pagan isn’t the answer.
Fuck you Dad! is not a credible life philosophy. Who will sell your Viking horn mugs?

“Do you know a male who has been with tons of women? Did this guy feel guilty or did they feel admired?”

In the latter case, either they have psychiatric immature issues / are a minor and glamorize how ‘cool’ this makes them (attention) or they’re an r-type. Out of school, nobody decent admires the impulsive, the attention dries up, gloating at how they got away with all the ‘resources’. The out-of-control aspect is common among cases of brain damage.

http://gettinbetter.com/casanova.html

I can’t think of anyone who envies the bestial, but they must imagine themselves envied to cope.

“self-sabotage in personal and professional realms”

Where was Narrator’s ambition in his old job? He’s still working. He could’ve got a better job or moved company.
Where did the magical ambition fairy pop up?
The black-outs seal it and fact he’s literally Unreliable Narrator.

“an incapacity to want you unless they can’t have you”

Peter Pan.

“A colleague who works almost exclusively with male borderlines, has told me that they generally present as commitment-phobes and sex addicts”

Imagine the film without Marla. She’s far more interesting than he is, isn’t she?
So even in a film all about men, their lives are hollow until a Manic Pixie in black comes along.

“Casanova makes sure you know how grateful he is to have finally found you, because you’re “like no other woman” he’s ever known. His enthusiasm and glee seem authentic: One of my ex’s would initially remark how great it was, that he’d finally met a female who was his “intellectual equal.””

Not that they’re writing checks on themselves they cannot cash.
Do you know how many men literally claim an IQ of 170, thinking we cannot tell?
It’s like claiming to be 7 foot tall. We’re fairly certain you’re lying.
And if Einstein was around 150, what the hell have you done with your life? Ah, degeneracy. Sleeping on couches and clubbing. Sounds more like an IQ of 70, lower IQs are more aggressive. Men who talk and talk and talk and talk, do not have anything to say. Let alone 170 in IQ points material. You wouldn’t be telling some random woman in that case, you’d be submitting it to the Nobel committee.
BPD is one of those conditions with negative self-awareness, they are among the greatest losers of society but dat
grandiosity, they claim to be the best. You know — secretly.

Otherwise their awesomeness might explode the world or something.

Random: The remarriage thing sounds like Elon, now that combustion would be entertaining to watch. It’s part of the control where they trap a woman, intending to cheat. They don’t ‘mean’ the vows but you better uphold yours! (not how it works? very stupid men)

“The brunt of his unhealed pain concerning the loss of other attachments was transferred onto me”

The BPD will deliberately cause suffering in those stupid enough to stick around them.
They vent out the pain and enjoy seeing the result of that pain in others. In a padded cell, with nobody to hurt, they’ll kill themselves rather than cope with their own emotions.
When caught, they play wounded, cry victim, gaslight the victim that they’re the ones being abusive. Look at the honest comments in any story on the topic. It’s what they do, it’s their game.

“Tears streamed down his face” imagine an adult with the brain of a toddler
that’s literally it

At least they tend to attract other shit-tier people.
Again, omit Marla because at minimum she’s female and Tyler isn’t actually there.
All of them are pathetic specimens of men. Narrator’s leadership is never challenged despite superior men physically, it’s weird.

“Borderlines thrive on crisis, drama and chaos, which contribute to their sense of aliveness--it’s the main reason why many are treatment resistant.”

Lol, nothing about Fight Club reminds me of that.

“The Chase is intoxicating for Casanova–outside of that, he gets bored. Borderline females are the only ones who are better at this game than he is~ and in truth, they can hold his attention indefinitely.”

Marla.
Your parents’ issues are not yours.
That’s an excuse, isn’t it?

“Aside from any sense of empowerment he may have derived from adopting the role of surrogate mate for Mother, replicating his father’s antics helps him identify with the dad he never had, and minimize his pain from the missing paternal bond. Stealing another man’s woman enables him to punish/shame other men, as he might have relished doing to his father, as an abandoned little boy. This pattern compulsively repeats, as he’s acting-out unresolved rage from childhood neglect and betrayal.”

Maladaptive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repetition_compulsion

“Apparently, he’d needed me to desire him, to fortify his self-image.”

ah, the sad specter of the aged playboy

“Many are determined to tell me how much younger they look than their chronological age,

that’s a tell

what great lovers they are, and how every female they’ve been with sexually, has declared them “The Best!”

Ask for their social media names to check. Watch the color drain.

A confident male doesn’t need to talk about his sexual prowess, or anything else he feels sure of for that matter; income, job status, athletic superiority, good looks, academic achievements, etc.”

What does Marla say?
It isn’t a threat to you?

“Too many females are easily taken in by the Borderline’s apparent brilliance and base of knowledge. In direct contrast to the instability you’ve observed in this male, there have been times you’ve glimpsed what seems to be his wisdom, his spirituality and his incredible knack for stating things that make him sound like the absolute authority on health and well-being. Borderlines are usually plagiarists and copycats.

It goes on about their Guru Complex. Isn’t Narrator trying to be a secular Guru?
Feeling dead inside is ill, full stop.
Poor Jewish men (there’s a section).
Narrator points out his father abandoned his mother… but he hates his mother.


The father would deliberately set up multiple families (think Bruce Jenner), classic r-strategy.
The emotionally disturbed are strong projectors, don’t even need a lightbulb in there.
Combined with hazing, it’s like the military but for pussies who fear real discipline, since they lacked that growing up.

Apathy isn’t a motivation, here in the real world. They fuel themselves with spite and hatred. Of the good.
Tyler the Tyrant, worst father figure ever (with the hand burn to prove it). Self-destructive people are one thing, but to wanna destroy the world? …Like there’s no good in it, ever? Classic narc. Tough love is not repeatedly punching another man in the dick. It’s called sadism.
Fight Club is a homoerotic (men only) S&M club and I dare you to prove otherwise by definition.
Wiping out all debt is a kiddy solution to adult problems. It doesn’t change the shitty characters that got into debt.
It’s the hipster love of authenticity, via anti-authenticity. Ironic authenticity, via cookie cutter.
Like the Gary Stu of James Bond, they parody masculinity by needing to do something to prove they’re a man, and that thing is materialism. Prove it to who? Long lost Daddy. Maybe after twenty years he’ll come back. So instead of working for the Man they pay for the Man’s approval. Smart.


Nobody in Archer is likable either. All of them are trash people.

That film is far more hostile to men than it ever could be to women.
How many years are you working off the clubbing debt? Did you add up the whole shebang? Aren’t hookers cheaper? Yes, of course you’re in control, now hand over your credit card to the nice bartender for some shitty, shitty vodka.

PSA

Modern men are stupid and it makes me sad.

Why do Boomers want an NHS?

The most common STIs include chlamydia, gonorrhoea, herpes, syphilis and genital warts.

Rates for the 50 to 70 age group are at their highest on record although this may partly be due to better detection methods.

Highest on record, including returning soldiers. When Universal Care had to be set up after WW1 because so many men caught STDs from prostitutes. Prior to this, STD care was excluded because medicine was church-funded and you deserve it.

Ironically, if they hadn’t flooded the First World with the rest of it, they’d have kept cheap/free healthcare, it wouldn’t have crashed (in their lifetime) and killed them.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-4014138/Rising-divorce-rates-casual-sex-condoms-young-means-STDs-soared-38-baby-boomers.html

Total cost is multiplied by people in the country, dummies.

Neurosyphilis would explain their voting patterns.

http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/resources/history/AQA-81452A-24667-LA.PDF

http://ww1centenary.oucs.ox.ac.uk/body-and-mind/the-british-army%E2%80%99s-fight-against-venereal-disease-in-the-%E2%80%98heroic-age-of-prostitution%E2%80%99/

During the First World War, VD caused 416,891 hospital admissions among British and Dominion troops (Mitchell & Smith 1931: 74). Excluding readmissions for relapses, roughly 5 % of all the men who enlisted in Britain’s armies during the war became infected. In 1918, there were 60,099 hospital admissions for VD in France and Flanders alone (ibid.: 73). By contrast, only 74,711 cases of ‘Trench Foot’ were treated by hospitals in France and Flanders during the whole of the war – and this total also includes those suffering from Frost Bite (ibid.: 88). Although Trench Foot has come to symbolise the squalor of the conflict in the popular imagination, a man was more than five times as likely to end up in hospital suffering from Syphilis or Gonorrhoea.

The army should nip that in the bud and just shoot the leaders of degeneracy.
It’s a coward’s way to get posted back home.

Deliberate illness by ‘lifestyle choice’ is unacceptable.

Public money was going on these pricks. At least send them home, make it public knowledge of the reason for the disgrace.
The women were obviously spies and should also be shot.
You know most of the users would’ve bragged, getting their innocent comrades killed.

It’s a war, no fucking around.

I’ve read cases of men going loopy from STDs after the war and unlike the PTSD cases, nobody cared. Well, you brought it on yourself.

Not to mention, makes us look bad abroad and the families, including wives, were naively sending gifts.

In British military law, only the concealment of VD, not the contraction of a disease itself, was punishable as a crime (Manual of Military Law 1907: 278, 285). Nevertheless, soldiers who were hospitalised with VD found themselves penalised by an antiquated system of ‘hospital stoppages’. In the days before a National Health Service, any man admitted to hospital for reasons not connected with his military service was liable to have money stopped from his pay to help cover the cost of his treatment. Although ‘hospital stoppages’ were finally abolished in October 1917, a levy was retained in cases where a man was deemed to have been admitted ‘through his own fault’, VD patients and alcoholics being the principle targets (Hogge & Garside 1918: 325). ‘Hospital stoppages’ became, in effect, a fine.

You know what we do when a dog won’t stop fucking?

We castrate it.

Nobody else is allowed to fuck on the job.
You’d never catch the Spartans doing that. Family honour, national pride.

Treatment was invasive and painful, and VD hospitals, set up in 1915 to concentrate expertise and keep VD patients away from their ‘honourably’ wounded comrades, often had a poor reputation for quality of care (Harrison 1995: 140).

We should have those again.
Wages of sin.

You wanna know why so many modern men are infertile? Look at the sins of the father down a few generations.
There are times it’s a good thing someone can’t breed.

STDs and child disease

I was reading this

https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2017/oct/16/itvs-victoria-illustrates-how-19th-century-sexism-helped-syphilis-to-spread

because I wrote that piece on syphilis.

As well as causing infertility, syphilis can induce miscarriages and stillbirths. Some children born to syphilitic mothers will never show any signs of infection. Others die in infancy or develop serious health complications.

And antibiotics are failing.

And it struck me, wait, that continues on. It never disappeared.

Except women are still the ones blamed despite men counting more partners in studies (most sluts are men, mathematically and willingness plays into this) and there are links to psychiatric conditions.

No pill for ruining your legacy.

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/02/herpes-virus-may-be-trigger-autism

Top of my mind.

“It’s a very important paper,” says Karen Jones, a behavioral neuroimmunologist at the University of California, Davis, who was not involved with study. “It’s also really important to remember that not every mom who has HSV-2 is going to have a kid with autism.”

The idea virgin brides will prevent any STDs or medical grievances is absurd.
Chastity applies to men as well for good reason. Purity is physical?

This idea either sex can both have their cake and eat it is childish. Have it All is a lie sold to weaklings. Adults make difficult decisions, you don’t pop into the Perfect Husband/Wife mold overnight, it takes years and plenty of omissions!
To put your future wife and children at risk like that when sex toys exist should count as abuse, since abused children have similar problems, including catching the diseases of the parents.

http://bigthink.com/videos/kathleen-mcauliffe-and-impact-of-disease-on-sexual-attraction-and-fecal-transplants

The microbiome sexuality link remains strong.
Any sex, but especially anal.
Wow, I wonder which sex was brainwashed into being obsessed with that?

The focus on women is based on the fact we carry, we aren’t the source of the problem.
That’s medically impossible to be both cause and effect.
Fresh infections cause the most damage. Whose fault is that?