Link: On pathology of low birthrates, explained

From the HBD side, both Anonymous Conservative and Jayman have previously agreed that the low birth rate of liberals is a feature and not a bug. The former from the perspective of low child-rearing in r-selection and the latter from genetics and, I guess, Malthus?

It’s connected, r-type extinction events are Malthusian in nature.

Obviously, the PC practice of pathological altruism (there is an academic book of that title on the subject) is applying ingroup evolved mechanisms to depress the ingroup birthrate and increase the outgroup based on the largesse of state theft. It’s a combination of resource reparations and treacherous (if not suicidal and insane) genocide, by the post-WW2 original definitions, already linked here.

http://shylockholmes.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/on-pathology-of-low-birthrates.html
~tuts in Social Darwinism~

A selection of neat lil quotes.

“But even people who think about this when it comes to profit and organisations often don’t think about the equivalent for ideas and cultural practices.
To wit: if you want a culture or idea to survive, the people who practice it must have high birth rates…
Because ideas, like most things in this world, are heritable. Both genetics and culture mean that parents in general pass their values on to their children. Take away the children, and you take away the people likely to hold the idea tomorrow.
Of course, people are apt to forget this, because it’s a slow-moving effect. The faster way ideas spread is through communication across a given population.

requires homogeneity and a culture of respect for received wisdom, interrupted in the 20th century, when all the major fault-lines started showing

Which is all well and good. The more you spread the idea, the more people who hold it right now, and, ceteris paribus, the more people will hold it next generation…..”

Richard Dawkins did not advance the idea of a meme.

It was Darwin.

The ‘gene’ is an idea of transmitted information, it is not limited to the biological, it is symbolic theory nor limited to precise ranges of biological material. That is a 20th century use based on chemical experiments to ‘crack’ human DNA using computers.
‘Origin of the Species’ should be on school reading lists. It isn’t because it’s accurate and unPC. Many science teachers aren’t qualified to explain it either, knowing nothing about say, farming or animal breeding, which are used in examples. You need life experience to explain life.

Meanwhile, the intelligent are either at home or in the wider workforce.

Later, on progressivism, political correctness, social justice warrior feminism etc…
Feminism in particular needs a constant fresh crop of young women far more than Patriarchy.

Anti-natal ideologies are parasitic on the host’s reproductive potential, it cripples more surely than Polio. Just look at abortion and anything labelled Cultural Marxism, it’s dysgenic, it’s a society-killer. Just like there are no centuries-old atheist or multicultural societies, these things do not have any survivability or, in PC terms, sustainability (really longevity, they don’t stand up to the scrutiny of history). The ‘right side of history’ rhetoric assumes humans have innately changed within a few generations and the old rules no longer apply.

Why? They are ‘fat and happy’ for the first time in human history. If you look up the history of mankind, we are not designed for this surplus unless our behaviours are prosocial and good for fitness of our ‘family’, genetic kin. (To love your neighbour had always previously meant distant genetic kin). However, charity has murdered the West as well as it has Africa, the fighting spirit and much of the independence and creativity has gone, the intellectual thirst died with candy. A little hunger if we fell behind on bills without welfare or some reliable religious fasting kept us sharp, there are plenty of studies that demonstrate health benefits, epigenetics is coming in, microbiome improvements AND the cognitive spectrum from starvation to gluttony, each with particular traits. Could it have been a sin because it leads to a decadent mind? Perhaps. Too much of a good thing is a very, very bad thing. All these anti-obesity efforts that blame the wrong thing (it isn’t fat, it’s carbs) and increase the price of basic foodstuffs (see CPI and how starvation includes malnutrition, with the lower nutrient profile of mass-produced food) and THAT is a superior explanation for K-shift and the so-called ‘rise of conservatism’ like a tidal wave.

Bread and circuses.

The deepest self-loathing is genetic suicide, the notion you don’t deserve to live – into the next generation.

All surviving religions have a pro-natal credo. This is not a coincidence.

I like these old-type posts but feel I’m explaining why water is wet.

SI

If you’re searching for dysgenic factors or variables to trigger suicidal liberals.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/01/18/practically-why-is-the-left-dead/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/05/20/21st-century-economics-are-making-millennials-infertile/

2016 for the Right

right

We’re called The Right for a reason.

2016: The year we finally responded to the culture war, and won.

I predicted last year that this one, would be the Big One.

Word is the finance thing is happening on a loop of ten, from 2008, meaning that next year, the incoming year, we’ll have the tremors before the avalanche. I hope it isn’t true, I’ve also seen predictions up to 2030, who knows?

I would say it’s the year normal people stopped trusting the MSM, thought for themselves and the year the Left lost its cool along with its social relevance (sticking up for ever-more niche minorities will lose you the common man). Now it’s pretty much a bunch of old guys grumpy round a table because they don’t get why the old words aren’t working anymore at shutting up anyone with data. It was a mirage, social power was all they had. Now, it’s barren rhetoric and empty emotional appeals.

Video: What Millennials find immoral


What they report in spite of social desirability bias.

Most of the 30% or so are sluts themselves, or would be if hot enough (like the virgin who pretends to get laid to try and become popular).
Ask turkeys if they’re in favour of Christmas.
Ask alcoholics about Prohibition.
Ask potheads about brain damage or schizophrenia risk from smoking.

Much has been written on the future of Millennials.
I know one voice has little relevance but I do get around socially so here goes.

Q: How can you (Gen Y) be socially conservative, but seldom economic?

A: School brainwashing turned us off the prospect as the ideology of Bad People, teachers drilled this into us at such a young age, we’re still deprogramming with the internet. While young, we care for social approval. We don’t wanna be blacklisted from future employment for sharing the wrong opinion on social media. However, once the other shoe drops, cradle to grave socialism is publicly seen as mathematically impossible and we know 1. there is NO free lunch, ever and 2. the unfunded liabilities we vote in, we will never receive personally, watch that economic thing snap back to match the social data.

One benefit of the way we were raised? (child-centred, the term)

Millennials will always vote in our own self-interest.

As every generation before us, and rightly so. The Guilt Train from our elders isn’t working anymore (see Best Post). We refuse to clean up their economic mess.

At present, many of Gen Y still think The Government has our best interest at heart. Seriously.

The Boomer hate for us, expressed in places like The Guardian, is the beginning of the resistance train (wait, why does college tuition need to go up? Why is my Obamacare so expensive? Why should I vote in open borders to be replaced when I worked hard at school and need a first job?) and the result will be a young, conservative voting bloc.

Why should we respect our elders, when they taught us we are their equals?
Why should we trust their opinion, when they screwed up plenty of things, refuse to take responsibility and want to guilt trip us like children? Didn’t these people raise us to say we’re smarter, special and we’ll have power one day.

Hell yeah, we’re taking it.

We’ll write the history books.

The collapse should come proper once we’re in power.
Our summary of Boomer policies, post-War socialism, will not be rosy.
Those Boomers responsible cannot stand this fact. They’re looking into life extension to prolong their privilege and barring us from the same progress across the board.

We’re noticing.

We’re slowly waking up to that fact.

Our parent’s generation did all the typical rebellion: the drinking, the drugs, the tattoos and the sleeping around.
We’re rather disgusted by the fact few of them have grown out of it.
They ruined marriages for this.
Why would we follow in their footsteps?

We came into a bad economy, all we want is security.
In our own country, we are told we are evil for our race/sex/sexuality, despite choosing none of these, and if we can’t afford to get married/have kids/move out, it’s our own laziness. We send out hundreds of job applications, but immigrants take the positions.

Why cling to the Left?

We hope for a Government bailout.

Once this is denied, the S will be Hitting TF.

Politics ignore housewives at their peril

http://takimag.com/article/more_from_the_housewives_please_gavin_mcinnes/print#axzz41Und5V00
There is an issue with bringing in this standard. The new Muslim family down the road with 5 kids would have the most realistic opinion (it presumes monogamy). And if having children is required to possess a low time preference (correlation yes but what about young people, too poor to afford a family, being responsible?), we must rope men into it too, since they’re usually the most politically tuned in and run for most office.

If a man is a bachelor, his political opinion on the future must be irrelevant. There is some truth to this because, as he says, with no children, the person has no stake and on the contrary, betrays a lack of faith in the system as a whole. This is why there used to be such a thing as a bachelor tax, by no less than the mighty, manly Spartans, because they drain the system without paying back in with future workers/soldiers (and tried to make good wives become adulteresses). Women classically control the purse strings because women buy the food, clothes and other rarely considered aspects, like kitchen appliances, that the family needs. The man fills the purse, he doesn’t control it, and advertisers know this.
If the experience of women is so important, go with the most experienced: wives and mothers.

“That’s why we need to include housewives in the equation. I want them in aprons, too. Feminists will say wearing kitchen clothes and being on a first-name basis is demeaning, and that is because they’ve been brainwashed by Notorious RBG to think the kitchen is a jail cell. It’s not. An apron is a badge of honor. You don’t use it to get men fired or censored as childless women in the workforce (SJWs, some are male) seem so determined to do. You use it to create sustenance for the people you love. It’s a cape that’s on backwards. To be a “kept woman” means a man is keeping you—as opposed to throwing you away when you start looking old so he can go fuck someone else. Modern feminism is perfect for men because it’s all about getting the milk for free as they go from cow to cow.”

A+ and men don’t throw women away, boys do, since they don’t appreciate what they’ve got.

Feminism has handed men all the sex-based chips and they love it. Women are holding nothing, having lost the innate SMP advantage thanks to sluts (see the ‘economics of sex’). Men are responsible for the demise of women, as every generation, every century prior has protected us, yet this lot contribute to the problem of ruining them. And then they complain Where have all the good women gone? They were good prospects… until you Pump and Dumped them, dummies. You can’t make hos and complain about the paucity of housewives. Now players are caving and marrying up/breeding with sluts and frankly, they deserve each other.

There isn’t a study of the sexual partner count of men against divorce risk, they’re scared to gather the data, since most of the repeat divorces pushing the overall figure up are by men (Trump being a prime example) but they assure us as they manwhore around it can’t possibly affect their brain’s ability to pair bond, despite neurological evidence presented in books like Hooked, where the pair bonding ability (or lack thereof) operates the same in men and women (or, for the sluts, doesn’t). Would you want to marry someone who can’t love you? Who cannot physically draw the loyal connection required and stay when it’s tough? Oh, they can lust, but that’s all they can do, that novelty will wear off. And they’ll lust after others too. Does that sound like a good marriage prospect? They’re that playa with a side ho who lies and calls her GF so she can’t cheat too, but apparently cheating is fine? That’s the trashy mindset. R-types are rejected from the social consideration of marriage due to their deserved reputation. Bragging about it only draws in like, leave them to it.

n.b. Not that all housework is automatically Woman’s Work. That is a feminist myth. Men used to do appropriate work we now call DIY. Yeah, still housework. Working on the car? At the house. Fixing the appliances? At the house. Opening the jar? In the kitchen. Prior to the Industrial Revolution, spouses used to divide labour equally, the main difference being the forced required for those tasks. Yes, women tended to cook, but men still made tea as well as carrying things. It wasn’t a case of women being suited to Woman’s Work, but men being suited to the stuff requiring physical strength, Man’s Work.
In the UK at least, as I covered in the universal suffrage post, women swing elections and swing them conservative. If we’re being as obtuse as to pit one half of the family unit against the other (a house divided…), the woman is more right wing. The average working class husband tended to vote Labour/Left because they promised higher wages, every time, higher wages. Sadly, this gambit worked. When you think Social Conservative, a man doesn’t spring to mind, does it?
American women don’t seem to trust Hillary (especially her support of Bill). They voted in the Affirmative Action candidate last time and look what happened. Trump should have Palin as VP, it’d be great.

Who do these guys think they are?

Short post. I was doing my usual scan and I came across this;

http://www.rooshv.com/we-must-spread-counter-propaganda-to-women

omg shut up stupid dumb idiots argh ahhhh hiddleston facepalm deep blue sea

Title says it all. You don’t have to read it, it’s an example of the mindset.

In Britain, we have the common retort, a rhetorical question Who are you? when somebody without qualification and status begins to get ideas above their station. It’s supposed to act like a short, sharp verbal slap, a reminder that no, you can’t do everything, quit trying. The politer version you’ve probably heard is mind your own business. Now, I’m hardly one of those people staunchly against self-improvement, but we must recognize that the sexes are not, in fact, equal, and therefore, a man can no more lecture women on what we “should” do, than we can lecture men.

In essence, they need to back off. The backlash is happening and we don’t need them nor want them. Clean your own house of the fake MGTOWs and bitchy misogynists who want excuses and sex slaves before whining to us about your list of ‘demands’. We owe you nothing and vice versa. If we’re so bloody terrible and practically Satanic (if you read the article he makes out like we’re all lolloping Liliths ready to steal your sperm and make demonic hellspawn), you won’t mind leaving us the Hell alone, will you? Act in accordance with your beliefs. Like a man.

First issue: you require moral authority to give anybody moral advice, anywhere on anything. PUAs have negative moral authority, they are an immoral authority, from a traditional perspective. Wtf.

Second issue: you’ve never been a woman. OT: I was listening to a Clarey podcast and they started speculating about female orgasm problems. Aside from being incredibly rude and one sided (as if the majority of men who have the same don’t cause it by their porn use), I would never claim that sort of objectivity on a subject which has not and can never affect me, like Erectile Dysfunction. It just seems like they’re taking all the stereotypical, historical male issues and trying to maintain psychological distance from it (that’s called Cognitive Dissonance, kiddies) by kicking women and saying it’s our problem and blaming us and demanding we fix the (often unisex) problems while they kick back and do nothing. That’s called projection. You see, men aren’t rational beings, humans altogether are not rational beings, but men are incredibly gifted at rationalization. As we say, they could sell sand to Arabs. Doesn’t mean you need sand. Rhetorical skill is a negative in a world that values results.

Third issue: A traditional life takes decades to build. You can’t just hop off the carousel and change your mind and think you’re a suitable candidate. This is why Roosh’s ‘Poznan Institute‘ pisses me off, aside from the legal issues of aligning yourself with a European city state, when they’re against doing that without their permission (I would bet money he doesn’t have legal approval and this jibes with the general ignorance of PUAs when it comes to local law, see my post on PUA filming and London law).

Fourth issue: insulting much? Do I need to go into this point? Pretentious? Shallow? Hm? Aren’t we adults here?

superman drinking give up nope

But when women give men girl advice, they look down on us. Works both ways, bitches. Either each has a legitimate opinion on a discrete list of topics, or neither of us has.

Fifth issue: Beware of Little Hitlers. Anyone who seeks to control the lives of others is doing it because they cannot control their own. In the case of the Roosh cult, he wouldn’t DARE lecture them on male issues as if they’re personally responsible. He will never blame men. I challenge him to do a single article where he spends the entire thing blaming men for this Patriarchy dissolving, because women sure didn’t have the political power to destroy it. He spouts the same Polyanna It’s Not Your Fault BS that Oprah, Jezebel and Cosmo do. He simply switches up the pronouns.

For example, from that article where he lets loose his anti-white inner Muslim (it always comes out eventually, he wants to cover up beautiful white women with sartorial sackcloth), here’s the first line.

The structure of mating is determined by women, not men.

Then women are the powerful, dominant sex. Logically the one who sets the tone has the power. Second paragraph;

Unless men control women, they are at whim to what women want.

Oh, they want it both ways. Like the fucking feminists. Women are so weak and stupid we can control their lives. Uhuh. But they want to believe they’re secretly better. That’s got a name, it’s a bloody conspiracy theory. Matriarchy keeping you down. You was Kangs! You built the pyramids! Muh dick > your bodily autonomy, but respect the law because it’s best for everyone!

It is quite literally retarded. It isn’t even wrong. How many do you wanna bet believe they can win arguments purely on the basis of being male? Like a Man Card and oop, they win. Like the feminists who say This is why we need feminism? How many of these spergs probably call themselves rationalists, because they read a bit of LW and got a B in maths once? Cos that’s where all the atheistkult people went. What sort of dipshit appeal to authority is that anyway, like the losers who put MGTOW in their screen name – to harass women online? Sure, you don’t need women, you sure seem to need our attention though and we’re sick of it. You promised to leave us alone now actually fucking do it. Go. Walk out the door. Just turn around now, cos you’re not welcome anymore. Identity politics needs to hang in a gibbet so we can watch it rot. You go off and build your castle (from your keyboard apparently) and see how many women still avoid you despite all the trappings of outward success, not because you’re a man or the system is against you, but because they see you, as a toxic personality, and we avoid the feminists with the same too. Women are the emotionally intelligent sex. Mindfucking is our game, that’s our mode of interpersonal aggression and dispute resolution. This is pathetic meddling like the SJWs crashing the AVFM conference. You’re just like those normalfags. Traditional people don’t need you because we’re self-reliant and genuinely independent. Quit with the megalomania Savior Complex.

The manosphere is deteriorating in quality, the logic has fluttered out the window.

Feminists hate anyone who fucks men, including other men

We have the same reaction to you as the lefty atheists who claimed to be Islam experts overnight after the Paris Attacks, trying to lecture us on what it “really” is and how it “should” be (Hume spins). Your opinion is invalid. Your opinion does not count. You can have it, but nobody will listen to it.

Notice they’re suddenly trying to hop the r/K fence? No. It doesn’t work. Ks have standards. We guard our borders. It’s like they’re switching to saying Pro-Family but have abusive ideas of how a family should be led since their fathers did such a cracking job with them… (you’re not a King, you’re not always right, you listen to your commander in chief and if you make that whip noise seriously you’ll only attract dull co-dependents), it’s a power-trip fantasy. They’re White Knights. They want to save us (traditional) women and we’re the type that, by definition, don’t need help.  Go save a ho, Captain! We don’t want what you’re selling, you can’t buy in with us that easily. They don’t even want to be fathers, they find the idea of fatherhood deeply repugnant (r-types gonna r) and think it’s all the woman’s business. If real Kings can play in Palace nurseries, so can you. You take responsibility for the life you make. I figured out their deal, a while back. I didn’t want to write it up but they actually have a fetish. It’s called an impregnation fetish. That’s why they go on about female rape fantasies (which don’t exist, see post), as projection from their own, yet again. If the woman actually got pregnant they’d run like the little bitch cowards they are, the apple from their own deadbeat absentee father’s tree, while talking up a big heap of bullshit on Patriarchy and how important fathers are. Talk is cheap. Stick around for two decades making a meaningful contribution to society without deferring your agency to the opposite sex or pretending like your little brain controls big brain and maybe people will begin to respect what you say.

You wanna do God knows what on your own time, with your own money, in a way that doesn’t affect me whatsoever?

looking for a fuck to give loki thor 2

Go ahead. I don’t care. You be as degenerate and filthy as your nature compels you. That’s open-minded and that’s tolerance. It’s your soul, your karma, your own life you’re ruining. In fact, I’ll enjoy the show and laugh when it’s called in. People get the life they deserve. You wanna make the wrong choices, don’t go crying to us, Grasshopper, we’ll leave you outside to freeze come winter.

HOWEVER.

You start trying to control free people’s lives like they’re your fucking slaves and you have any rights over us? Die. It’s a human impulse and right to be free and I honestly hope there is a Hell for preachy people like that.

i hope you fucking choke love heartbreak

Going about it in the sneakiest, r-typiest way too (propaganda) just shows up what they truly are. Deceptive rats, which are an r-selected species. Mind your own business, fix your own life. Butt out of other people’s and sort yourself out.

Links: The Sexual Revolution robbed women & Men have never had it so good

http://www.capx.co/why-we-dont-need-a-male-suffrage-movement/

http://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/laura-perrins-sex-has-been-devalued-women-are-to-blame/

Gems like;

“Whilst poor, unskilled men have certainly lost out in the income stakes, many have received a bonus that matches that of any banker: it is a bonus paid in sex rather than money, and it’s not only women who are footing the bill, it is also hard working men paying their taxes – taxes which are being used to clear up the mess left by men who are not, like themselves, taking responsibility.”

Any ‘man’ calling for the Patriarchy needs to man up and wife up his last slut and settle down to a life of bland domesticity immediately and if he complains, he is just as entitled as the feminists. You can’t Have It All. You have to choose.

No such thing as a social liberal, economic conservative (man). There are parasites off the State (welfare for their bastard spawn, free STD clinics) who want to keep all their own money from paying into it. They have no conscience.
Or, as TRS refers to the likes of them;

PUSSYNERDPUAs (*Pick-Up Artists*), men who keenly-recognize the decay of modern human relationships, yet choose to contribute to the problem.

i hope you fucking choke love heartbreak

We never used to have a SMP in the first place. That’s the first problem in a long list. Whatever your opinions of evobio and the ‘natural’ functions of men and women, humans were never meant to be a functionally sterile species.

Enjoying the decline doesn’t screw over other people, yet these sociopaths would have you think otherwise.

You can be certain anyone bragging about how they’re gonna be poolside, isn’t.