Link: The liberal case against identity politics

You wanted it, you got it, toots.

https://www.vox.com/2017/8/15/16089286/identity-politics-liberalism-republicans-democrats-trump-clinton

They’re right in that it’s good for the right and bad for the left, since the left is all about diversity and identity unifies and homogenizes. Nature is conservative and red in tooth and claw.

They cannot think their own policies through to its logical consequences and the unintended ones are farcical.

We’re the same!

Wait, no! We’re different!

We’re somewhat the same but totally equal!

Then there’s all the inequalities!

Hail Science! Unless it’s fake!

Praise the Faith of Liberal Creationism!

It’s totally 100% completely genetic!

Unless there’s engineering tech in the works!

We need immigrants!

We hate robots!

We’re futurists!

We love tests! 

Academia is racist!

The Lord made our enemies ridiculous.

Social Justice liberal rapists

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/calais-jungle-volunteers-sex-refugees-allegations-facebook-care4calais-a7312066.html

I wanted to write that combination of words, it isn’t far off.

Everything’s conditional on their feelings, remember.

That’s the reason they tacitly allow rape of minors and women – they’re hardly blemish free, sexually.

Remember, coercion vitiates consent. I doubt you could be more coercive than threatening someone’s safety, food supply and future. I suppose the French aren’t exotic enough for these sex tourists. All sex tourists are creeps, even SWPLy white women.

I knew it I'm surrounded by assholes

Not a peep from feminists but at least the SJW rag Independent is covering it.

Reminds me of the SWP rape scandal.

They signal so hard – out of repressed or socially conditioned guilt.

R-types hate other r-types, but they’ll happily exploit, ruin and rape one another. Honestly, they assume we’re like them and we’d do the same in that situation, like Rotherham, allowing them to sleep like babies, although this is the ‘refugee’ version and not supported direct by taxpayers, police, hospitals or Government. No conscience as we’d know it, an inner compass, they take direction in the form of signalling. More extreme r-types are ironically despised by the less extreme and personally this has been going on since the beginning, why else move children preferentially? It isn’t just rape (mostly), but child rape, and many of the campers prefer fresh meat, one in the story even took one home like a cabana boy, after shopping around with her vagina. This behaviour isn’t acceptable in anyone held to a First World standard, I don’t care what colour or sex or sexuality they are, where’s the human dignity? Although the hooker thing is unsurprising, given Slut Parades, fat celebration, STD positivity etc. Words that should never be combined except in parody. Still, they use their own bad behaviour as proof everyone involved should be rewarded with more free stuff. No wonder the military age men think when they arrive that white women are whores, seriously. I saw one fake-grieving on the BBC today that his wife and child drowned – he looked as if he’d done it, no trace of remorse. What’s the bet he pushed them over to save himself, as ‘Asian’ men with a name starting M don’t value us, about the same as cattle, and now coincidentally he’s free to pursue the white meat. I’d like to polygraph that slime.

Those greeters on the news should be forced to sleep there for a week and report back on how peaceful these people are in reality, did you see what they did to pretty-boy Jude Law in spite of his heavies?

They keep saying “largest economy on the planet” or “largest economy in Europe” – the people who just turned up are entitled to precisely Jack shit.

Actually, no, less than the rest of us, who built these economies and continue to contribute to them.

I would like to enforce my “freedom of movement” to enter and exit Ford Knox, freely. I’m amazed the supposed anti-racists got away with calling it a Jungle, tbh.

thatsjustsickewwtfgrossno

Minor jab: the Slut Parades are especially funny when you realize they’re trying to out-attention gay men. More like a Fag Hag Swag.

And hey, who do you think tipped them off about an online spat?

wink zooey

Video: Social Justice Losers

Note: White people have been oppressed …by white slavery, from Barbary to the Ottoman Empire.

Typical r-types, they can’t even threaten us properly. The type to passive-aggressively say “Please, kill yourself” while saying you can’t joke about depression, self-harm and suicide because that’s sick.

Anything to distract and weaken the whites. Note how the non-whites tend to gang up before they start. They like to lead in with Muslim women, who have three whole cards to play (other is race). If these people had arguments, they wouldn’t need to talk about the speakers, including themselves. Debate ignores the speaker unless their behaviour is hypocritical e.g. calling for a Patriarchy while promiscuous, and only then to the extent where it weakens their spoken argument.

The most sexist, racist, bigoted people you’ll ever meet. Imagine how bigoted it is to demand anyone who disagrees with you be fired, ostracized or arrested. The crime of dissent.

Consider their background. They had all these middle class opportunities and to their parents, they still failed, They are truly losers. They hate themselves, based on fact and project this out onto everyone else. Seeing everyone else as hateful. They’ve scapegoated what they can never be, the successful, normal white person. If Whitey is the villain, everyone else the hero, right? Let them. Let them start on the Whiteys. Perhaps encourage them. Let the people who would otherwise defend them see how these vindictive people would sell them for a cracker.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Undoing_(psychology)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acting_out

Best thing we can do is ignore them. Attention is power to attention whores. They crave the validation their parents won’t give them.

They crave their parents to have gone back in time and slapped some sense into them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alloplastic_adaptation

I’ll leave this here.

http://narc-attack.blogspot.co.uk/2007/07/hurting-you-isnt-something-narcissists.html

They pose as victims to get real potential victims to soften up.

I don’t ask you to take my word for this. Test what I say when I say thatnarcissists hurt you on purpose. Anyone can test any narcissist.

Here’s how. The next time the narcissist is hurting your feelings or making you feel low, let your feelings show and tell him or her how they are making you feel asking them to stop it.

Be prepared for a shock. Any normal human being would soften and let up, but a narcissist will do exactly the opposite.

What does that mean?

Is revving up their engines, kicking in the afterburners, and running you right over an “accident” after you show your soft underbelly and beg them to let up on you?

It’s no “accident,” that’s for sure.

Want to see a narcissistic rage? That’s no “accident” either. The test: Just fall to your knees in tears begging them to have a heart and stop kicking you around like dirt.

The narcissist’s response? He or she blows up into a rage. Is that rage an “accident” when nothing but how deeply they are hurting you provokes it?

No, it’s a willful and wanton outrage.

Now hear this: THEY DON’T DO IT BY ACCIDENT. They aren’t just inconsiderate and touchy.

Test their “touchiness” (if you can do so safely, or have somebody not at the N’s mercy test it – someone who can defend themselves). Rage right back in their face. Act just as wild right back in their face. Threaten right back. Speak abusively right back.

Now any normal person would be provoked to rage by your doing this in their face. But narcissists are so UNtouchy that they do the opposite. Watch how instantaneously the raging narcissist becomes meek and mild and switches to his “I-wouldn’t-hurt-a-fly-mask.”

Don’t take my word for it. Test it. You CANNOT insult a narcissist who isn’t in a position to bully you! It’s impossible. Try it, you’ll see. Your lack of vulnerability gives them skin a foot thick! (Not to mention a rubber spine.)

…They aren’t touchy at all. So perceived slights aren’t what set them off. The VULNERABILITY of a TARGET OF OPPORTUNITY is what sets them off – IF there are no witnesses.

That’s predation, not touchiness.

queenbeeing.com/narcissistic-rage-narcissistic-injury-need-know/

Narcissistic rage and narcissistic injury go hand in hand. While they often claim that their raging behavior is related to stress, the opposite is true. In fact, a narcissistic rage is triggered usually by some perceived insult, criticism or disagreement that results in a narcissistic injury.

The average raging narcissist thinks that her victim intentionally caused this so-called “injury” and that the victim did so with a hostile motive.

You’re not the victim, I am!

The reaction to this trigger is often intensely disproportionate to the actual “offense” committed by the victim—and invariably, the victim in these situations sees the narcissist as unreasonable, out-of-control, mean or even just plain old crazy.

http://www.afterpsychotherapy.com/narcissistic-rage/

Likewise, rage may function as a defense against shame that feels unbearable.  These two are connected:  shame, as I discussed in my early post on basic or toxic shame, is the emotional expression of our sense that we are damaged; that sense of damage can mean that the self is felt to be in pieces, in danger of collapse.  Hatred, anger and rage serve a defensive and cohesive function for these conditions, especially when there has been a narcissistic injury to one’s sense of self that stirs up unbearable shame.

every time someone disagrees with them, it seems like life/death
that much ego

Narcissistic rage may also express a frustrated sense of entitlement, by which I mean the feeling that one has a right to be given something which others believe should be obtained through effort, and unrealistic expectations of favorable treatment or automatic compliance with one’s expectations.  While this is a characteristic feature of Narcissistic Personality Disorder, I’ve seen it in every borderline client I’ve treated, and in many clients with Bipolar Disorder symptoms, as well.  A sense of entitlement reflects an inflated view of one’s own importance and rights, which features intermittently  in many psychological states of mind.  No doubt you’ve known people who express this sense of entitlement, whether or not they fit into any of the diagnostic categories with which we’ve all become familiar.

Entitlement to other people is the worst kind.
No, sex isn’t free. No, people aren’t obliged to fancy you. No, you don’t deserve respect.

Video: 5 signs you’re a regressive Leftist

They use the term Right to describe conservatives, so Leftist is more suitable, plus, they aren’t liberal. They’re bigots and fascists (they want to ban other opinions and control everyone, respectively). Bigots want to brainwash everyone into their faith (it’s a cult) and censor everyone who doesn’t convert.

Social engineering is the PC term for fascism. You will be a pig in their ‘social experiment’.

Remember, SJWs always lie, and they use the insults that would stick to them.

Regressive is a cultural thing, it doesn’t get to the White-hating demographic genocide heart of the beast. Useful meme but we need better.

5. You’re against freedom of speech. Hate speech is the tool of tyrants suppressing dissent in a legal gulag.
4. You’re extremely racist and bigoted. ‘Privilege’ is a form of mystical possession that comes with having the right to live in a country because your ancestors built it. “The soft bigotry of low expectations”, hmm.
3. Your arguments aren’t arguments. They work in thought-terminating cliches, emotional appeals and ad hominem. “Heretic, sorry, wrong century, hate speech!” they cry, piously.
2. You like banning things. They believe in the Devil, it’s you. They believe in God, it’s them. Everything they want is Righteous. They are self-righteous narcissists.
1. You deny reality. That is psychotic. That is insane. No, literally, the definition of psychotic. They don’t recognise it and act as if nothing happened, or as if their fantasy world is the real one. Narcissist rage awaits correction by people or reality. Tabula rasa started as philosophy, it’s used as pseudoscience.

These people are generally privileged middle class crybabies bullying other people to feel less incompetent in the world. They have a huge classist chip on their shoulder and hate themselves. This is the face of the Middle Class with a chip on its shoulder. The chattering class started barking orders because WW2 killed the upper class hegemony.

Breastfeeding? Not natural, not better

I can’t believe how far this SJW influence has come.
They will happily ruin people’s lives for the sake of politics.
Breastfeeding is the definition of natural, it’s a condition of being mammal, and every reasonable study conducted has proven it is better.

http://www.examiner.com/article/pediatrics-journal-says-to-stop-calling-breastfeeding-natural

A new article in the journal Pediatrics is calling on health professionals to stop saying thatbreastfeeding is natural, arguing that doing so gives the impression that natural parenting practices are healthier. The authors have started a public campaign to end the positive use of the word natural, claiming that it is associated with such “problematic” practices as home birth, homeschooling and the rejection of GMO foods, and that natural parenting movements are interfering with vaccination efforts.

In the article, Unintended Consequences of Invoking the “Natural” in Breastfeeding Promotion, Jessica Martucci and Anne Barnhill, Medical Ethics and Health Policy researchers at Penn Medicine, wrote:

Building on this critical work, we are concerned about breastfeeding promotion that praises breastfeeding as the “natural” way to feed infants. This messaging plays into a powerful perspective that “natural” approaches to health are better… Promoting breastfeeding as “natural” may be ethically problematic, and, even more troublingly, it may bolster this belief that “natural” approaches are presumptively healthier.

They are generally healthier than what humans can come up with artificially, because evolution. EVOLUTION. For example, natural pesticides turned out to be better than DDT. Say sorry to the parents and deformed children who trusted expert opinion. Not close enough to pediatrics? How about thalidomide? What about the cancer risk of hormonal pills including birth control? Future fertility side effects and miscarriage/abortion risk?

Not even real doctors. Ethicists. Who have no problem with trashing the Hippocratic Oath on abortion, euthanasia (both eugenic operations) and still-living organ donations.

They removed this line from the modern oath: “Nor shall any man’s entreaty prevail upon me to administer poison to anyone; neither will I counsel any man to do so. Moreover, I will give no sort of medicine to any pregnant woman, with a view to destroy the child.” Vaccines (esp. adjuvants) and abortion/chemical contraception, right there. n.b. It is little-known that hormonal ‘birth control’ doesn’t stop you from getting pregnant, it stops you from staying pregnant. No wonder it’s meant to be temporary (just a few short years) or there are serious fertility risks.

The Japanese did better in the 16th century. “You should not kill living creatures, nor should you admire hunting or fishing. In our school, teaching about poisons is prohibited, nor should you receive instructions about poisons from other physicians. Moreover, you should not give abortives to the people.”

What about making the ethicists financially accountable for this BS? Would they say it if millions of people could sue them for being wrong? Why can you sue the doctor but not the person they’re taking expert advice from?
Think I’m kidding? What about the toxins that can find their way into baby formula and are seldom recalled? What about how you’re not supposed to use tap water to mix it up, but they never actually tell you that, so your baby gets poisoned/OD’d with fluoride when it doesn’t even have teeth? What about the bonding and the microbial protection from the mother’s skin-to-skin contact? Can these people be sued for the consequences of their orders? Make no mistake, they are trying to order people about what to do in their own personal (medical) lives, they’re even trying to order around doctors, despite being less qualified.

Where’s the accountability?

Video: ‘Anti Social Justice: A Helpful Translation Guide’

I suppose this is meant to be ‘triggering’ to the likes of us…?

crying laughter lmao

At least she tried.

I reached out to her earlier today to try and come to some understanding, charitably offered to take down my two original posts about her. She blanked me, on tumblr no less. I can’t say I’m surprised. Here’s what I sent, I’m not ashamed of offering an olive branch, so she can’t lie about that too;

Hello I know this will seem strange but we all do strange things, don’t we? I’ve been thinking re these 2 articles specifically @ tinyurl codes: jdpyngk and jhhnrht I don’t think my intentions were made clear, I wanted to protect people from bad/harmful advice to their case, as long as you agree to implore people to seek a professional AS WELL, and ask me nicely, considering your troubles and suicidal state recently, I am willing to take these 2 posts off public view. Do we have an accord? DS x

Seems reasonable, no? Each mental health case is individual, experiental advice commonly does more harm than good. I made a simple request: That if you lecture people on medical topics, as psychiatry follows the Medical Model, you advise them to seek a professional?
Character limit meant I couldn’t put a question asking whether she actually wanted them removed (or maybe she likes the bump in traffic and someone to oppose? My numbers are higher than hers.) and that was why I put the ask nicely part (on tumblr those are done in reply in-system), because she may not actually want them taken down for whatever reason and we’re British, polite is how we roll. Omitting a please is like a punch in the face.

anyway moving on awkward 10 doctor what wut wtf

I’m bored writing about her, she has that much in common with Roosh I suppose, they both feed off the attention in some sense, hence his attempted dive into a new pool of potential BS buyers and her new series goading the people from the chans who see the label ‘SJW’ like a red rag to a bull.
I hope it becomes a form of trendy social signalling. Easy to spot in the wild, you see.

She gets it right at the end of this video, though. People in favour of what she calls ‘social inequality’ are in fact arguing for a meritocracy, which is race-blind, sex-blind, and like all true ‘justice’, blind to wherever you come from or what you are. Which SJWs argue is a good thing? While they’re pushing identity politics that refuse to let the various cards go (if we’re all human and nothing fine-grain, this is a category error to use incorrect labels like race) and use them as blunt rhetorical weapons against the dominant democratic structures. For example, see the recent hashtag #BritsSoWhite, whereas the musical apartheid of the MOBOs get not a hint of a negative mention. I’m so glad Twitter is gonna tank in light of this injustice, see why here: http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/why-twitters-politics-ultimately-doesnt.html
They don’t want equal opportunity, where results are ranked or stratified, but statist-enforced equal outcomes, and this requires dragging the more successful people down in the name of categorized peoples who can actually think for themselves and object, not that it matters. #NotYourShield

She’s doing a literal series, literally called Being an SJW, if any of you want a laugh. The comments on the above video are also quite something.

Remember the law: SJWs always project.
After introjecting guilt for existing. Ordering ‘check your privilege’ is a personal attack, calling someone bigoted, ignorant or evil, is a personal attack. It is defamation of character, the modern equivalent of crying Witch! or Heathen! Why do people feel threatened by SJWs? Who are you to deny their experience? Maybe the no-platforming scientists for doing science, threatening the livelihoods (getting people fired and blacklisted) and threatening the very lives (SWATing) of dissenters, sending rape threats to women (some previous rape victims) who are anti-feminist/SJW and rentseeking taxpayer money better spent elsewhere for problems that will never be solved because they don’t exist, cannot be falsified/verified to exist objectively and seem to exist to give Identity Crisis Studies majors an easy job, like Connie St Louis, who lied about her CV. Did she get fired for this fraud, where anyone else would? No. Such worthless people have nothing practical of value to add to society, so Crusade, with themselves as judge, jury and executioner. See monstering mobs on Twitter, which is supposed to be illegal. That’s why people are leaving Twitter in droves, the SJW plague. Authoritarian is too polite a term, not to mention inaccurate, as authoritarianism is conservative. They are totalitarians seeking to censor and oppress anyone who is Not Them. The insane people who say Newton’s Principia is a ‘rape manual’ and are literally anti-logic, because apparently logic is the invention of white men…

slatestarcodex.com/2014/09/30/i-can-tolerate-anything-except-the-outgroup/

I don’t think you should speak to her because I might get blamed but at least you can see what I have to put up with.

eyeroll jessica jones omg wtf shut up

Her fans keep coming here.
omg the comments…
all I did was highlight inconsistencies 
there were screencaps and references to social justice resources
#journalism