Tolerant left wants to censor private conversations

The Left always become tyrannical oppressors over time, who end up mass slaughtering the people who won’t tolerate it. Lefty bigots.

Trump, when is he banning companies from getting involved in politics?

This is anti-democratic.

I told you not to talk to them. They have nobody to attack any more, nothing to fight – this makes them impotent. If you don’t cut the head off the Hydra, it can’t grow more! Avoid the control freaks (isolate them like they want – safe space?) or they will get you arrested. You can’t fix the stupid. And you’re making them stronger with your eyeballs on their twitter etc. They feed from attention and they’re starving.

She wants to ban jokes.
Seriously. Why not make it the Meme Banning Bill?

State sponsored sense of humour! When do we get a list of requirements!

Vice police of the mind!

This is anti-safe space, does tumblr know?

All the fandoms that would die?

Most fandoms are millions of people in groups online.

Hey, they arrested people for making public opinions known so people hid in DM and PMs and the like, how is this surprising? But how will they ban any forum? (members 500+)

YOU CAN’T KILL AN IDEA, LABOURITE.

They want to break up large groups so they can pick off each group and the others aren’t warned about this or tactics in good time to respond. A group of minds is essentially a supercomputer and trained on political info (e.g. Q) can uncover many things.

The sluts have the most to fear from this, because if they ban private conversations, all your flirting online will have to be public. All the girls will see all the tactics you try on the others.

This ruins freedom of association, including intimate (emotionally intimate) conversations. They’re trying to call everyone else a cult… the New Church Ladies.

It isn’t about women, that’s a straw man. They don’t like being questioned, especially journalists, anyone with bias. There shouldn’t be “protected groups”, we must be equal under the law? They’re allowed to judge us, we aren’t allowed to judge them (r-types fear The Mob).

She should fuck off and take her menopause meds instead of taking it out on us that she isn’t getting enough follows on twitter. Yeah, you can’t force people to like your message, Mz Hitler! All their signals are turning against them, because their mask is slipping….

And by banning all others rhetoric, that’s what they’re trying to do, they think they can force people back asleep.

She could start a blog but people have to be dedicated to read those and you can’t really shame people for seeking out ideas, a liberal principle. It’s freedom of speech. One reason I don’t advertise or shill. I’m not harming a fly over here so…. where’s the grounds?

Logically, she’d have to ban large social gatherings, including pubs. In London, the largest social gatherings happen in mosques….. so…. nothing will happen. Khan won’t let it.

She’s carping about online harassment, when that’s an SJW-pushed thing. Well, wouldn’t this then apply to all the SJWs who go around monstering random, normal people? Trying to ruin their lives? One rule for plebs, is it?

And you wondered why nobody wanted to vote for “I’ll make upsetting Muslims illegal!” Miliband? We know that ends in a very literal test of the phrase “sticks and stones…” or a gay club shooting. Let them all have their bloody diversity, don’t lift a finger.

She implicitly admitted she starts arguments with people then gets all triggered when they argue back? Like people? Maybe don’t get angry at everything?

You can’t win without having the debate first, you dumb cow.

You people have been politically retarded since the Blair era, they haven’t adapted for the times whatsoever and expect the rest of us to slow our roll.

You don’t have to have a twitter account. You don’t have to use the internet. Go home, old hag, you clearly hate what the internet is about. Nobody gives a shit if you’re an MP if your points suck donkey balls. Those people disagreeing were trying to help you! Become more relevant!

The internet is not for people like her, she isn’t tall enough for this ride.

Young people aren’t buying papers these days, let alone The Guardian (its readership is dead/dying, look up the data). If they had a paywall, their traffic count couldn’t justify all those journalists – and you know they wouldn’t fire all the white ones! The Guardian’s white journalists rake in the majority of their traffic because the Boomers reading it only want to read them (e.g. Toynbee).

This is Old Media (dying media) protectionism.

If politics is a “science”, they can hide data behind paywalls far, far away from the voting plebs!

Sargon: Censorious social media

Un-personing is against human rights.

Digital Sine nomine.

They’re depriving a person of their livelihood, nowadays a social media presence is compulsory. They brought this about, they are duty bound to it. They serve US, all of us.

Terms and conditions do NOT apply above the state’s law and common law.

Terms and conditions are not legally binding documents until proven so. They are literally made up and “complied with” completely arbitrarily – not how real laws work.

These are ideological witch hunts.

300 years ago, they’d be accusing the prettiest woman in town of being a witch because she wouldn’t sleep with them.

comment

I would question the moral code of these social media companies especially YouTube. I flagged content made by a YouTuber encouraging adults to sleep with minors (named kun Tyra or something) and YouTube kept the content up without flagging the channel for child endangerment. Let seek out this union and because this behaviour stinks to high heaven.

It’s like how tumblr is a porn site but parents let their kids on it because the kids only show them sweet Disney cartoons. On Youtube, most channels are shilling and they aren’t legally required to disclose this. You want full power? You need full responsibility. No “mistakes were made”. I’ve flagged things as literally toxic – nobody cares!

They are guilty of treason by acting as judge, jury and executioner, terms and conditions are NOT “enforced” because they are not a government. Nobody knows who they are, they are biased and nobody can vote them in/out. They are acting beyond their authority.

Internet access is a human right, it was proven in an EU court.

https://www.euractiv.com/section/innovation-industry/news/broadband-internet-access-will-become-a-legal-right-under-new-eu-telecoms-rules/

and the UN agreed

https://www.wired.com/2011/06/internet-a-human-right/

As in, “de-platforming” online is illegal. Equivalent to banning someone from a public park (speaker’s corner)!

Monopoly laws must be applied.

The world’s noosphere isn’t run by middle-class post-grad America.

They are just a platform, the power is with the people.

They’re scared of him, which will make more people listen, the morons.

Streisand Effect?

aka why hardly anyone links to me.

The best way to win on this is to push the classist angle.

They are. They’re keeping the lower orders in line. It’s all about classist brainwashing.

This isn’t like kicking a gadfly from a college class. That’s also technically illegal since they pay for the class.

You’re a utility, you can’t turn down anyone for service.

My electric can’t switch it off because they dislike my opinions on ketchup.

My water company can’t stop because my musical taste sickens them.

They are there to provide service. To serve. Censorship is illegal. Nobody signs up to be censored.

Social media FANG-type stock would collapse tomorrow if they couldn’t illegally handle your data and get away with it. PM/DMs/Email are privileged communications. If you’re speaking about medical issues over DM or to your lawyer by email, it is breaking privacy law (the human right) to scan or read it. They’re opening your letters.

Judging, editing, copying and/or banning it is…super-illegal.

They’re a public service. The Post Office doesn’t approve you for sending mail.

They serve the public. The public > Them.

Do you really think this info just stays in the companies? They don’t talk, compile hit lists, gossip to their friends about this one user?

The Left are the ignorant ones

I’ve never had to explain shadow banning to a right-winger.

It’s always the left wing.

You can explain in five different ways.

They still won’t get it.

“But I posted it, people can see it!”

Really.

It’s only up FOR YOU.

TO MAKE YOU THINK YOU AREN’T CENSORED.

To trick you into using a service that won’t serve you.

This means you won’t seek out or make competition.

It’s anti-competition and hence, illegal.

Done?

Good.

Another point:

Just because they write something in a shitty Terms of Service doesn’t make it legally valid.

It has to end up in court and be maintained, which almost never happens.

Otherwise they could take all your rights away because TOS.

Anyone can write a TOS. You can write a TOS. It means nothing.

So no, instagram don’t own your photos and if they use your copyright for a profit, you can and should sue. You didn’t negotiate terms and they didn’t expressly pay on a photo by photo basis. They can’t deprive you your IP rights as a content creator. Same with YT videos.

They are a hosting service with delusions of ownership.
On the DailyMail, a celebrity’s selfie will have the copyright logo and …”Instagram”.

No?

Challenge that, Trump.
The copyright is created when the photo is made, there is no transfer without a specific contract and exchange of money. No.
They use this data, sell it and things you always own (even after death) like your likeness can be used for deepfakes and AI “research”. Informed consent in experiments means you must know what you’re entered into, study by study, with an option to opt out. They stole the data for research so it isn’t scientific and none of it actually counts.

They are acting as an illegal government, over-ruling the real one.

That’s why their stock price is so high.

Silicon Valley’s social media will go down in history as the biggest attempted intellectual property theft in human history. They don’t own your crappy poetry, your book reviews, NONE OF IT.

Things also turn invisible, disappear entirely from the selected page the FIRST time you load it (because who loads twice) and Twitter decides to unfollow people for you and follow other people on your behalf if you’ve been away from it for a length of time and presumably, won’t notice.

Make an offence for digital gaslighting?

Video: Facebook Sharia

They’re murdering atheists. They’re killing agnostics, scientists, anyone who thinks. Freedom of speech does exist for atheists, speaking as a religious person.

This is evil, joining forces with savagery.

When you defend Islam, remember they’d kill you for it.
Appeasement doesn’t work on backwards ‘cultures’, Facebook should be tried in an international court of human rights.

As I’ve heard, “The peaceful Muslims are DEAD Muslims.”

FYI This is why we had a Reformation and now have the internet.

Meanwhile, our current PM advocates for her own slavery.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/674489/Home-Secretary-Theresa-May-says-Britain-benefits-Sharia-Law

Facebook helping the Left eat itself

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/05/facebook-is-helping-the-left-to-eat-itself/

Recently, I’ve seen otherwise moderate Lefties go insane.

Long rants to complete strangers on unrelated pages.

It’s been fantastic. The best part of the internet is reputation.

People can discern who the liars and nutters are pretty easily.

rdj claps applause mhmm

Also, our term.

Yes, there is an ouroboros of the left.