Brexit, a vote against classism

Repost, expanded for ease of search.

Men, do not oppose your own, White male or female. That’s what your enemies want, division!

REALITY:

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/who-voted-brexit-how-eu-8277077

“Class splits emerged, with the rich and well educated beaten Out of the 28-nation bloc by poorer, working class voters.”

It’s class war, actually.

White pill, actually.

The WWC [white working-class] want automation; harder, faster, stronger because it’s been replacing them almost two centuries and now watching faggy little Timothy who draws hentai with a degree in media studies from Portsmouth quietly tacitly complain about being replaced by Asians is gravy.

Now the crocodile is eating you, cunts!

Asian got a diversity promotion over you? Oh noes!

Your white privilege was showing!

Porous borders “Globalization” was such a strength, innit?

Maybe you should learn to code… wait, Indians got you on that one, too!

And there’s a billion of them! HA. Their cost of living is so low, if only we had a smaller state, eh? And… population?

Maths wins.

Guess you’ll have to be poor like the people you hate.

The ones who won’t hire you.

Like this but the far more common DROP in social mobility.

Nobody dares publish a social mobility study by race, huh?
Because diversity is our strength… in opposite land.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/state-of-the-nation-report-on-social-mobility-in-great-britain

Shut down public schools, make them all multicultural. Because Equality Act.

They’re finding out the slow way, the ‘racism’ has reasons…

And UBI won’t help the middle-class, it’ll actually fuck over the huge Asian families burdening the welfare state when they actually have plenty of money for handbags, cars, holidays. You get money based on race, not class here.

Malnourished? Get sick? The medical jihad stats based on race in the NHS would be interesting.

UBI would help the WWC, that’s why the Guardian UK doesn’t seem to want it!

“Lord Ashcroft ’s research also found no difference between how men and women voted – despite eve-of-poll claims women were more likely to vote In.”

That’s called psyops.

Note, it didn’t work. This shocked them.

Like the pink bus. Shocking.

White women:

The ballot was basically “import rapists, yes or no?”

If you look at posted studies on food security, they’re skipping meals so their children can eat. No, they don’t want a family of 18 moving in and bullying or attacking those children. The exit tax on London, like CA’s, will be hilarious.

from the social mobility report, 2016: “millions of workers – particularly women – are trapped in low pay with only 1 in 10 escaping”

If only low IQ Polish whores weren’t stealing their jobs (while also claiming welfare) and sending their five kids out robbing their houses.

It’s pretty easy to tell who gets most of their info online – they think the Polish have white IQs, are patriotic and pleasant to live near. Reality points to their subhuman national IQ, tendency to move and rob in London and tendency to swarm the local culture with shitty supermarkets like a plague of locust. Pikeys aren’t our people and most of the women are fat boorish loud alcoholics or else, obscenely plain without make-up. They don’t want to live in Eastern Europe because it’s full of people like them.

http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/NationalIQs.aspx

Anyone claiming their IQ is between 99-108 (LOL) must wonder why Poland is so shit, then. The economy is shit, the culture produces nothing, no geniuses, that doesn’t add up. All they do is breed and thieve, like the rest of the Eastern European swamp. They have no dysgenic non-white influence tanking their GDP either.

So trad, they dump any British bloke dumb enough to fuck it as soon as she has a child for support payments, a passport and/or a replacement, also EE bloke.

Which, obviously, is deserved for fucking a foreigner and expecting it to end well. I’m 100% on the side of gold diggers only when they exploit race traitors. Pay the toll.

“The rich and middle-classes were more pro-EU.”

pro-cheap nannies

enforce minimum wage and put a 51% tax on remittance

the socialists wanted minimum wage, they can bloody pay it!

Fact: a lot of the Millennials who don’t drink can’t afford to anyway!

“The AB group backed Remain by 57% to 43%, while the poorer C2DE category was almost two-thirds in favour of quitting, voting Out by 64% to 36%, according to Lord Ashcroft .”

Seems pretty easy to explain if you know what ‘class’ is.

Who’s been fucked over the most?

But calling all poor people stupid and their politics ‘populism’ is the last acceptable gaslight and prejudice.

Can’t be they have experiences in reality that oppose Guardian rhetoric?

If only we could look at another vote in the West to double-check. Oh wait…

Populism is code for K-shift.

A term Stefan never brought up, in all his videos on it.

His Patreon’s fine, innit?

“Ethnic minorities and Muslims were Remainers, while whites and Christians were Outers.”

Stefan ignores this. For three years. He just forgot?

Minorities include the Eastern European.

White voters voted to Leave the EU by 53% to 47%.

The propaganda failed for the first time.

Most of remain are middle-class landlords who think it’s a retirement fund.

“Two thirds (67%) of those describing themselves as Asian voted to Remain, as did three quarters (73%) of black voters.
“Nearly six in ten (58%) of those describing themselves as Christian voted to Leave; seven in 10 Muslims voted to Remain.”

Not how race works. Can I identify as a Jew and be immune to criticism?

Imagine if 4chan all ‘described themselves as’ Jews for a month.

So don’t tell me low nation IQ Asians are more patriotic (fetishistic) to Anglo culture than the nice little tea lady down the road because muh dick>cooties. They’re hiding this data from you on purpose. Disinfo.

This is what is happening on the ground, don’t trust the internet. Duh.

 

The Left cannot force white women to vote for them so their best bet is making their own men turn against them and, they hope, push them leftward in defence. I have heard them plot this with all the ‘white male misogyny’ BS, deliberately avoiding the class elephant.

They think white women will fall for this, when it’s lefties that are being ratted out as the rapist scum they are. Even in the SWP.

I… don’t think so.

😉

Video: Crash-causing debt

A jubilee is a bailout of bad investors, fuck ’em. Everyone has a sob story, equal outcomes is still cancer.

Screw the stupid, not responsible. They deserve to suffer.

Greedy people suffering poverty is FAIR. There’s deserving poor. Social mobility must be allowed to also go down to ever recover the society. Middle-class people who ‘resent’ slipping down shouldn’t have bought cliche Hermes belts and tacky Gucci slippers.

Meritocracy – the greedy fools lose their shorts. And if they were so smart, they’d be fine with slipping down knowing it wasn’t just luck and they could make it back, right?

The average cannot bail out low IQ and it shouldn’t have to.

Someone’s labour would be devalued. That’s slavery. Pay the piper.

I wanna buy a sportscar. I don’t. Why? First, I’m not a man so there’s no phallic inferiority complex going on but generally, it’s because I am not a thief. I refuse to get into debt dishonestly. Old-fashioned I know. It just seems like a bad idea. Jeremiah 17:11.

Likewise, by contrast I know people, lots of people otherwise sane, who are running up huge allowance credit cards assuming their parents will ‘help’ them buy a house to get grandkids or that they’ll definitely get their dream job and promotion. Lumping in the reckless with the responsible will breed resentment. Idiots only learn the hard way.

Every time they see me not doing this, struggling like young people are supposed to, they’re really smug about their ‘cunning plan’.

It’s literally most people under 30 I’ve ever met. EVER.

Every country, every occupation, every industry, every class bracket, every income level.

EVAAAAAAAAH. Consider the scope of that. People triple their age do it too. It’s the New Normal.

They all have the same fucking ‘genius’. You cannot talk them out of it.

They’re “not like other investors” TM. Every one of them is that arrogant.

It’s like fiscal Jesus is gonna rapture them out of debt, it’s creeping me out.

Magical thinking in the worst possible place. It’s impossible at this point, post-70-80s.

At this point I’m scared to bring it up. They attack like hyenas if you suggest the Government isn’t omnipotent like God and can’t spare you the Hell of responsibility for your own credit card purchases on shoes, be they Louboutins (painful) or Nikes (break).

They vote like rich celebrity assholes because they think they’ll be bailed out like rich celebrity assholes.

This cannot end pleasantly for them. They must learn the short term game ends in loss, long-term.

You have to let them fail now. Yes, even the Boomers. You’re WAY too old to claim ignorance.

When you’ve been doing the same infantile bullshit for over half a CENTURY, it isn’t really a ‘mistake’.

I take my lumps now and push ahead with less so I don’t have to do it old, ill and with less ability to recover. That’s natural law. You can’t circumvent another person who pissed their life away doing the easy thing every time. There’s no rewind button to circumvent those consequences of immoral choice. You can’t reverse decades of selfish stupidity bearing rotten fruit. You had your fun, for years. You spent while others saved. It’s winter now, you starve.

There aren’t enough beach-houses to go around. What everyone on the planet feels entitled to, it’s impossible to dole out equally.

You cannot cover arse for shitty time preference. It leaves someone else out in the cold.

I’m tired of the musical chairs dance. Yet I get it. I truly do.

They took the ending of Fight Club a little too literally. Wiping the slate won’t bring down the high IQ or raise the low IQ, it won’t make the fat thin and the thin less vegan, it won’t end Third World wars and it won’t be a magical blowjob machine of financial utopia. It doesn’t raise the dead who voted in the race and immigration melting pot shit so we can kick ’em (although the Cromwell treatment is on the table). It’s just nothingness.

Most of the Millennial “socialists” are like (90+%) actually of the Cloward-Piven let-it-burn motherfuckers school.

If you actually talked to them. “What if socialism fails and the economy collapses?”

They’re HAPPY about it, it’s spiteful on purpose. That’s a feature, NOT a bug.

If ‘paying dues’ gets you screwed. All Gen Y/Z heard from the conceited Boomers was, “you gotta pay your dues, you gotta pay your dues, you gotta pay your dues” well now we’re the major voting bloc it’s “you first”.

We’re not letting you take it with you. This is across left/right, we all agree.

It’s the last-ditch attempt to cut out the cancer of the corrupt.

They made us poor, …let’s return the favour.

Hey, the hippies loved to lecture us on the Golden Rule.

How do you hurt a rich person Trading Places logic.

Fix it or we break it even more.

The Left are the ignorant ones

I’ve never had to explain shadow banning to a right-winger.

It’s always the left wing.

You can explain in five different ways.

They still won’t get it.

“But I posted it, people can see it!”

Really.

It’s only up FOR YOU.

TO MAKE YOU THINK YOU AREN’T CENSORED.

To trick you into using a service that won’t serve you.

This means you won’t seek out or make competition.

It’s anti-competition and hence, illegal.

Done?

Good.

Another point:

Just because they write something in a shitty Terms of Service doesn’t make it legally valid.

It has to end up in court and be maintained, which almost never happens.

Otherwise they could take all your rights away because TOS.

Anyone can write a TOS. You can write a TOS. It means nothing.

So no, instagram don’t own your photos and if they use your copyright for a profit, you can and should sue. You didn’t negotiate terms and they didn’t expressly pay on a photo by photo basis. They can’t deprive you your IP rights as a content creator. Same with YT videos.

They are a hosting service with delusions of ownership.
On the DailyMail, a celebrity’s selfie will have the copyright logo and …”Instagram”.

No?

Challenge that, Trump.
The copyright is created when the photo is made, there is no transfer without a specific contract and exchange of money. No.
They use this data, sell it and things you always own (even after death) like your likeness can be used for deepfakes and AI “research”. Informed consent in experiments means you must know what you’re entered into, study by study, with an option to opt out. They stole the data for research so it isn’t scientific and none of it actually counts.

They are acting as an illegal government, over-ruling the real one.

That’s why their stock price is so high.

Silicon Valley’s social media will go down in history as the biggest attempted intellectual property theft in human history. They don’t own your crappy poetry, your book reviews, NONE OF IT.

Things also turn invisible, disappear entirely from the selected page the FIRST time you load it (because who loads twice) and Twitter decides to unfollow people for you and follow other people on your behalf if you’ve been away from it for a length of time and presumably, won’t notice.

Make an offence for digital gaslighting?

Paper: Non-whites are better off in Britain than White Britons

https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/migration-and-social-mobility-life-chances-britain%E2%80%99s-minority-ethnic-communities

The schools and academia seem to be the cause of this racist rot. Natives are being dispossessed, in a browner country this would rightfully cause outcry from liberals.

Unemployment in certain races is written off as a victim of circumstance rather than a possible lifestyle choice.

  • Exploring differences between religious groups reveals that, controlling for their backgrounds and other characteristics, Jews and Hindus are more likely to end up in a higher social class than their Christian counterparts; Muslims and Sikhs have lower chances.

Christophobia? (now a minority in schools in their own country, scored down on assessments for being ‘too white’)

Sikhophobia?

Jewish Privilege?

Hindu Privilege?

… Brown Guilt?

BTW The economy is screwed.  Some of these findings are not based on merit (IQ).

Link: Assortative mating and class

http://www.unz.com/jman/the-son-becomes-the-father/

Hardly any social mobility. No hypogamy. No hypergamy (the small-scale sociology theory seems to be wrong over many generations when you look at the genetics). I wasn’t expecting that. It shows psychology has its limits too, when they’re looking in the wrong place (teachers) and asking the wrong questions (how valuable is an education?).

What we see is clearly an argument for sexually selective Leagues. (Bear in mind, it would count MMV as well as SMV). It seems to be mostly genes.

The idea that this transmission of status over time has been as Clark found it squares well with another facet I discuss frequently on this blog: the fact that parenting doesn’t have much of a lasting effect on children’s outcomes.

Although parenting can let the team down if it’s atrocious (i.e. modern) and without instinct. But it seems later generations might have hope of regaining lost ground. Presumably there’s regression to mean in parenting quality, and since most people are totally forgotten by the 4th generation it’s no wonder we see no effect.

The interesting thing is that even the people who take me seriously on this point still believe that there’s something their efforts can do, beyond keeping their children fed, clothed, clean, and cognizant of the basic ways of the world. Steven Sailer frequently suggests that the outcome of poorer children, especially those of color (mostly Hispanics) would improve if they had fewer of them, and hence could afford to invest more in each, despite the fact that this doesn’t hold up in adoption studies.

It’s an oxytocin-based instinct, but it only seems that the majority of the affectionate instinct actually needs to be applied to the spouse (in both directions) to maintain the stability for the children. Another reason divorced parents are awful. Also, I wonder whether this would change the minds of any cuckolds saying they ‘don’t mind’ if a child isn’t theirs, as long as they raise them? This applies to women raising the children of former wives too.

This study found that “cultural transmission” (i.e., from parents) couldn’t explain the pattern seen in children (indeed, the parent-child correlation was negative once you removed heredity). The non-parental environment explained the variance, suggesting that other influences, such as peers, likely explain the results.

Why else do you think mothers care so much about who their child has for friends?
It can predict crime, drug use and all sorts (peer pressure).

This issue squares the matter with Gregory Clark’s results. That is, when you consider other facets, education per se doesn’t seem to mean much in the end. Apparently, you can’t teach moxie. This is revealed by the fact that every trait “going in” that shapes a person (and should be relevant to educational attainment) reliably shows absolutely no shared environment impact.

The Middle Class fallacy. Grit and resilience come into it too (the upper class have it, the middle class despise it).
You could put little Tarquin in the best school to ever exist, it won’t make him a genius.

…including one’s work preferences and interests, the presence or absence of mental disorders, and including the features of a person we think of as “character.” Parents leave no lasting effect on any of it, aside from what they bequeath to their children genetically….

The upper class try to teach their children life skills like grit too.
The middle class assumes it will just happen. Guess who wins.
We’ve all heard comparisons of our character or habits to deceased family members, right?
I would like to see hobbies compared genetically because birth order and sibling rivalry supposedly make children opt into different ones despite genetic similarity.

Who you choose to have children with is the most important decision of your entire life. No pressure. 

Indeed, when we consider the effect of measurement error (adding it to the heritability estimate and to the somewhat nonsensical negative gene-environment correlation values), the heritability of political attitudes and social values skyrockets, being upwards of 85% (74%) for views towards pornography in women (men). The heritability of overall political orientation, when accounting for measurement error, teeters on 100%!

Liberals and conservatives will be battling for a long time to come.

Bodes well for r/K.
I think this is why K-types seem so betrayed when divorced. Total speculation. I’m sure a lot of spouses cheated on would like to stone the 3rd party responsible. Religion is a good excuse to kill the competition.

(Hence the “shared environment” ≠ “all environment.”)

That needs to be made clear for the all  would-be sociologists.

But that’s all OK, yes? The whole point of education is to “shape” the raw individual beyond his/her genetic predilection, right? Wrong.

Education cannot change potential, it can only improve performance up to the ceiling OF potential, how many times do I have to say this?

The problem is that everything that comes out, the adultout comes, shows a shared environment impact that is also zero.

If your parents were screw-ups and couldn’t hold a marriage together, you’ll probably be a screw-up too. It’s the circle of life.

OK, so you might be willing to accept that you can’t shape your child’s personality or values. You can’t control his major life outcomes. You can’t even control how much money he will go on to earn. But surely you can do something useful, like leave your children a lifetime of happiness, right? After all, I believe, and advise, that a parent’s key duty, after ensuring that their children grow up healthy and safe, is to ensure that each has a happy childhood. Surely that must count for something, too,? It does, in the form of fond memories of childhood.

This is so brutal. So redpill.
The lesson is choose your spouse wisely and once you’ve got them, stick with them. You can’t choose your own genetic profile, but you can damn well choose theirs! (This is why women are so selective).

One’s lifetime of happiness boils down to genes and to the fickleness of luck.

yes lestat dancing happy cheery morbid black comedy

I’m one of the lucky people who can be contented in a shed.
It’s like when I was told Follow your Dreams and the money will follow! I was always like ‘but if you are happy, why do you still need the money to justify your decision?’, that art teacher did not like me, not one bit. School really is a prison but that’s news to nobody, frankly. You’re there to do a thing (pass grades) and finally they grant your release. Might as well game the system and learn other, more useful things with their resources while you’re there.

He will be who he will be. It’s only my job to help him get there, and pass on the legacies of all those who came before him. I did all I could do: I married well. Beyond that it’s in the hands of “fate”.

That’s the healthy parental attitude, not the Trophy Child, as I call them, where they need something to brag about like it’s a prize-winning pet or the Dead Dreams Model where the child is pressured to do what the parent wishes they had (a whole career, not little stuff).

The vagaries of the circumstances no doubt imbued good fortune on some and dashed the success of many others.

Whether your society (born into) was just and meritocratic, I’d wager.

But through it all, the thing that is at the root of continuity – DNA – remained the active ingredient to propagate lineages in their respective places through out the ages.
It is as it was said in the Richard Donner Superman films: “The son becomes the father, and father becomes the son.

Superman quotes now? Epic.

The 1.54% Boomer Riche

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/aug/27/number-of-millionaires-in-uk-rises-by-200000

One in 65 UK adults now a millionaire, latest figures show

snort lol laugh haha hmph derision yeah duh really uhuh mhmm princess bride

I wonder which generation this could be (mainly).

The number of millionaires in the UK has shot up by 41% over the past five years, with one in 65 adults now classed as having a seven-figure fortune thanks to booming house prices and stock market gains.

The stock market thing is usually a fluke, real estate is the prime moneymaker.

There are now 715,000 millionaires living in Britain compared with 508,000 in 2010, data from Barclays UK shows. Nearly half (48%) of all new millionaires since 2010 live outside London and the south-east.

The bank’s prosperity index found that Reading, Cambridge and Birmingham are the most affluent cities outside of London, and the east of England is the third most prosperous area.

Surging property prices and big returns in equity markets in recent years have combined with higher wages and employment rates to create more millionaires as the UK economy gets back on track.

It isn’t back on track but OK.

The research shows that every UK region is now more affluent than it was five years ago, with measures including household wealth, gross domestic product (GDP), exam results, charitable donations and entrepreneurship taken into account.

QE does that.
They mean NGOs, not charities. A lot of embezzlement.

According to the Office for National Statistics, the richest 10% of households own 44% of household wealth.

And which age group are they? Pray tell.

Akshaya Bhargava, chief executive of Barclays Wealth and Investment Management, said: “The UK is becoming more prosperous, with every region having grown in affluence since 2010. It is also encouraging to see that regions and cities are starting to close the gap with London in terms of prosperity, with the north-east, for example, seeing business growth rates behind only London.”

London and the south-east remain the most prosperous regions, and the capital boasts the most millionaires, up 48% in the past five years to 191,000 – more than the combined millionaire population of Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and northern England.

The east of England comes in third behind these two, as rising house prices push more wealthy Britons outside of London, with 23,000 more millionaires calling the eastern region their home.

Reading is listed second for prosperity in the UK, according to the index, with average earnings of £30,562. Growing numbers of entrepreneurs in the UK is also seen as a factor in increasing wealth, with Cambridge emerging as a startup hub and ranking third.

The north-east and Newcastle fall low on the prosperity index. But the study showed the highest rate of growth in millionaires was in the north-east and Wales, both up 50% since 2010. The study said northern regions “may be on the cusp of change, with the north-east leading the way”.

Despite the jump in wealthy Britons over the past five years, the research said growth in millionaires was expected to return to more normal levels over the long term, with a 9% increase in the UK expected by 2025, in line with GDP growth.

Almost like they brought in a new tax on BTL (buy to letters).

If we go back to before the Boomer panic of the Guardian, to  2011: http://www.theguardian.com/business/2011/feb/28/baby-boomers-secret-millionaires

The inadvertent burden baby boomers have bequeathed the young is sending Britain broke.

…Yet the accusation that boomers are protecting themselves at the expense of everyone else still stands, because relatively ordinary boomers will retire as millionaires, paid for by younger workers. Even the poorer over-50s need to recognise they are going to take out of society more than they put in….

PONNNNNNN-ZIIIIIIIIIIII.

ugh why no please stop god kill me now rdj tony stark

Among other resources;

http://www.nevermindthebuspass.com/wealth/baby-boomers-drive-rise-of-one-in-10-millionaire-households/

One British household in every 10 now has total assets exceeding £1m, according to a new book based on work at the London School of Economics published last week

Wealth in the UK crunched the findings from a comprehensive official survey that took place between 2008 and 2010, and found that 10% of households had total wealth of £967,200 or more….

…As lead author Professor John Hills explains: “It is not that there are millions of people with millions of pounds in the bank, but rather that London property prices and – for those lucky professionals who retain them – final salary pensions have quietly made technical millionaires out of many who would only consider themselves as solidly middle-class”….

i hope you fucking choke love heartbreak

…In addition, over-55s accounted for most of the 2.5m ‘millionaire households’, having benefited in particular from rising house prices. But there’s also a great wealth disparity among households in this age group….

Yet about 1 in 10 of those still managed to fail. Fail to save. Ever. Because magic money.

…The top 10pc in that age group own assets worth more than £1.46m, said Prof Hills, and the typical household had wealth of £431,000…..

…He also warns against the complacent temptation to regard the great surge in wealth at the top end as a “purely paper” phenomenon, arguing instead that it will have implications for social mobility for a long time to come…

translation: Gen Y are fucked.

http://www.if.org.uk/archives/2762/pensioner-millionaires-in-the-uk-identifying-the-numbers

The members of Britain’s baby boomer generation who are just starting to enter retirement have been called “the richest generation in history”. Yet, to a large extent, the British welfare state still treats age as a proxy for need, transferring large amounts of public money to all pensioners in the form of universal benefits, regardless of how wealthy they are.

Old goats for votes.

In order to help further the debate surrounding how Britain’s welfare state should be reformed as the population ages, IF undertook this study to discover how many members of the older generation live in households that have assets of more than £1 million, using data from the 2008/10 Household Wealth and Assets Survey.

The author estimates that in 2011, there were approximately 1.9 million over-60s living in households with asset wealth greater than £1 million, 1 million of whom were over-65 (above state pension age for both males and females). This finding should lead to increased debate about how the British welfare state treats pensioners who have large reserves of private asset wealth, and whether benefits should the distributed according to need rather than age.

Remember the Communist mantra?

no do not want go away displeased

…Pattern? What pattern?

In case you think I’m doom-mongering for Gen Y (Gen X got a mixed bag): http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3108441/Generation-Y-left-pick-6trillion-tab-Report-warns-children-born-1980-2000-face-apocalyptic-levels-debt-Government-spending.html

It begins (from this June);

Younger people are being left with ‘apocalyptic’ levels of debt, a report warns today.

I know the feel, bro

So-called Generation Y, born between 1980 and 2000, will be forced to pick up the bill for decades of Government over-spending, it is claimed.

*throws K-selection confetti*

Analysis by the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS) accused baby-boomers of making unfunded promises on pensions and benefits and then leaving their children to pick up the bill.

Surges of hormones make Hulk angry

Coupled with unaffordable housing, university debts, poor pensions and a ‘rapidly retreating state pension age’, Generation Y now faces ‘a quality of life below that of their parents’.

The CPS accused politicians of ‘fawning over the baby-boomers and older pensioners’ as they were more inclined to vote. The think-tank says the state’s liabilities – including ‘off the books’ spending commitments – is £6trillion, or £221,000 per household.

In the report, Tory peer Lord Holmes of Richmond said people in their twenties and early thirties faced ‘a struggle not experienced by previous generations’ as they had been left to pick up ‘the tab’.

He said: ‘Why should you suffer a standard of living lower than your parents?’.

The think-tank said overall liabilities had risen by hundreds of millions in the last five years alone – despite the country supposedly living in an age of austerity.

The CPS said the bill would be picked up by today’s young people, so-called Generation Y.

Their parents and the so-called baby boomer generation born after the war have been protected by politicians unwilling to upset older generations who are more likely to vote.

…In a devastating analysis, the report’s author, Michael Johnson, says: ‘Baby-boomers have become masters at perpetrating inter-generational injustice, by making vast unfunded promises to themselves, notably in respect of pensions.

 I love this suit and everything about this demeanour

Hating the Daily Mail is a substitute for doing good

http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/9501282/hating-the-daily-mail-is-a-substitute-for-doing-good/

It’s noticeable how often virtue signalling consists of saying you hate things. It is camouflage. The emphasis on hate distracts from the fact you are really saying how good you are.

#Humblebragging.

Status signalling is a bitchy, passive means of attacking a powerful subject in the hopes of gaining some of its status for being so edgy. Teenage girls do it. It is the mode of infighting between PC r-types, too scared of a real fight to ever back up anything they say with actions. In a logical debate, this is both poisoning the well and various emotional appeals about being evil as Hitler.

The Brahmin caste started it but over time is has descended to the rank of puerile name-calling ad hominem. It works for them because they cannot display their status in more overt means and must appeal to ideological purity to conform. It doesn’t actually work for the middle class, because they desperately try to signal with their toys and every aspect of their lives (dress, word use, hobbies). It creates an isolated echo chamber effect squabbling over details and this is why many SJWs, the product of taking their shallow parents seriously, are deluded about the real world. They aren’t in on the joke.

If the SJWs and wannabe middles succeeded, they would cease to exist. They look down on the poor because those hateful spiteful emotions must go somewhere. http://www.moreright.net/reaction-and-the-poor/ Tolerance is impossible in a world of difference.

They replace a love of class with a love of race/religion/sex/sexuality, any other cohort division because, would you look at that, they’re no longer responsible or need to feel bad for their higher position in society. The lower class and underclass fight for their own interests because nobody else does anymore and the middle despise them for daring to seek social mobility.

I just remind them of this;