You picked the wrong fucking field to have feelings.
Especially if those feelings involve censorship of facts you disagree with.
Do you know how many people continue to object to evolution?
Still true. We can see a fetus undergo the stages of evolution in real time.
It’ll never not be true.
We’ve found plenty of Missing Links, and Creationists move the goalposts.
That’s crazy, like suppressing crime and IQ data.
Scientism isn’t real, whatever your false idols tell you. They’re false by nature.
Nurture, as you call it, is mostly measurement error.
You are wrong in MATHS.
Only now, at the end, do they understand.
The multicultural experiment (official media term) was always going to fail because their core premise was that human nature itself could be controlled and experimentally manipulated.
Yeah… people rebel against that.
And it was just colonialism in reverse, instead of going to the poor people to feel superior (missions), they come crawling to you.
“What’s interesting about Haidt’s alternative interpretation of the liberal progress narrative is that he mentions two elements central to the narrative—private property and nations. And what has happened to a large extent is that as the failures of communism have become increasingly apparent many on the left—including social scientists—have shifted their activism away from opposing private property and towards other aspects, for example globalism.”
There’s no such thing as globalism, it’s a void of values. Like there’s no one language, a single language would be the starting point.
Empires unite nations, that’s why the British Empire taught everyone English.
It’s the best language, so you’re still using it.
Globalization has failed because the East has outcompeted the West. A world without white people will not be dumb enough to hand the enemy in various wars your very factories for slightly cheaper Nikes.
In real terms, they bred more, we paid for it and called it ‘aid’ and the future belongs to them barring famine.
Accept your death began with manufacturing. You gave away future prosperity, that’s gonna affect the birth rates.
“But how do we know a similarly disastrous thing is not going to happen with globalism as happened with communism? What if some form of national and ethnic affiliation is a deep-seated part of human nature, and that trying to forcefully suppress it will eventually lead to a disastrous counter-reaction? What if nations don’t create conflict, but alleviate it? What if a decentralised structure is the best way for human society to function?”
jesus my sides
genophilia is a dictionary word
ingroup preference is a well-studied phenomena
genetic diaspora exist, ask HBD chick
they’re so close to the pendulum of r/K, aren’t they?
nations formed of genetic tribes to alleviate conflict when weaponry advanced and made mass slaughter possible but, duh, undesirable, ask a forensic anthro or any evo biologist
hell, ask sacred cow Dawkins if supranationalism, the true name for globalism, is even genetically possible
chimps can’t do it, softy peaceable chimpanzee frequently murder one another for literally no reason than territory
it’s been filmed, I’ve seen it
“What if the type of mass-scale immigration
dictionary definition of invasion met but ok
even without weapons, you can ‘rape’ a nation’s women and state coffers (“economic migrants” literally invaders) and that is their intention
search weapons cache European mosque or something like it
happens all over
just the ones we find
currently occurring in Europe,
meanwhile, Christian genocide in MENA too
Look! A distraction!
containing relatively large amounts of people with different nationalities, cultures, and religions, is going against some of the core features of human nature?
Show me one place multiculturalism in history hasn’t involved a genocide at some point.
Look up Neanderthals, it’s now in our blood because it’s the reason we’re here and they’re not.
Maybe it isn’t, but if it is, do we have to wait until after the fact to say ‘well, globalism doesn’t work’, as we did with communism? Surely there is a better way.”
Picking up a fucking history book?
The burden of proof was on the pushers. They never did. Not even in their neighbourhoods or schools. The People never consented. When asked (see Brexit), they reject it.
Like the Unis in general, the social sciences only have a shit reputation now liberals are running it.
Coincidence, this is not.