Link: IQ and standard of living

We need an update.

Take the data, Trump. Publish it. Far and wide.

The State already controls how you reproduce. It takes money from the barren to pay for another’s child.

Taking child support from a non-parent is illegal….?


The biggest Dem weapon is the welfare cliff.

Video: Greg Johnson’s ‘In defense of prejudice’

Pattern-seeking, also called patternicity, is innate to mammals.

It is a survival instinct.

We can no more switch it off than our perception of colour.

Ignore the patterns at your own peril.

When you recklessly imperil the lives of those around you, they’re going to perceive two threats.

Original Threat + Traitor

Where there one concept, there is its opposite.

Where there is loyalty, there is disloyalty.

Where there is safety, there is danger.

Endangering others? Makes you responsible too.

Scorpion and the Frog. A snake doesn’t change its nature.

As for the mathematics, this is truly probabilistic. I haven’t seen this application before but it’s dead-right. This is why social science has proven (and hates to admit) that stereotypes are mostly true. Prejudice being acting according to these, where there is individual information to the contrary that they are ‘not like that.’ Self-preservation and precaution (Christian prudence) are the psychologically healthy reactions to logical assessments of risk.

Math standards fall to new low in the West

There’s a ruckus in the UK as the most recent school-finishing exam (GCSE) in Maths had a question idiotic teens are petitioning about for being too difficult. I am not joking. Outrage.

oh come on my god why NO kill me now

Here’s the PETITION:

The C2 exam was just hard for no reason. You can’t just set questions so hard and still expect people to pass with good grades or don’t Edexcel know we want to make it into Uni.

I just want to ask the people who set the quetions for this exam, if this is how hard exam questions were when they were in College then i dont think they will be where they are right now.

You need to pity us students who have been revising all year just for Edexcel to set some bullshit exam. The fact that people are signing my petition just proves how difficult it was.

don draper crying baby wah wah wah

When I was at school, this was the material we studied at 11-12 years old, and we were average to bright level, and the GCSE is intended for 16 year olds to sit. They shouldn’t be allowed to sit the tests in the first place, can we please bring in IQ now to qualify??? Reminds me of –


Can’t do quadratics or fill in n in the example to test it? [good practice] Thank a teacher.
This is quantifiable evidence of the decline.

crying weeping sobbing belle disney

Worst of all? This was apparently near the end (harder) of the Higher Tier (hardest) paper.

Lestat laughter lol lmao haha IWTV film

And n=10.

toasting raising glass cheers leonardo da vinci congrats well done demons

p.s. I am reliably informed the next section of the question asked to solve for n, so my brain just skipped over the first section of the question when I initially solved it in about two minutes, triple-checked in my head. That easy. I am not even good at maths.
I’ll just leave this here without comment:

Video: Harvard students try Louisiana’s 1964 Literacy Test

Predictably dumb. You aren’t supposed to collude. It’s a campaign to raise awareness about evil voter ID law, because having legal citizens vote once is just as bad as forbidding the low information ones. This just makes Harvard look bad.

There needs to be a parody of this. It’s begging for a parody.

I can sit here smug as a practitioner of mirror writing. I did all those in this article  or for the non-news source, this PDF and it was easy.

Questions to ask yourself:

  • Why did the students omit answers when the paper clearly explains it’s 100% pass/fail?
    One didn’t read that sentence, she is illiterate.
  • Why did the coddled Millennials throw a tantrum and refuse to do the test when it got a little bit difficult?
  • Why didn’t they re-read the question, which clarifies the instruction?
  • Why couldn’t they do it alone? In silence?
  • Why don’t they understand basic instructions, which is essentially the entire test?
  • Don’t they know what a line is?
  • Is there an answer sheet shown here by the totally biased ‘experimenter’? [No.]
  • If there is no answer sheet available, it’s unpassable and rigged, not a test. But there is an answer sheet, people did pass it, it isn’t rigged. It’s a matter of understanding instructions as well as carrying them out. They were cheating by asking for clarification.
  • Don’t they know the format is logical? It’s mathematical in prose, the geometry is the best example of this. It’s similar to IQ tests. It’s completely logical and acultural.
  • Notice how they tried first, expecting it was easy, then to cover for their inability, they blamed the test? It’s impossible they could ever be wrong or stupid.

There is no sexual double standard


This is why The Woman had no chance with Sherlock Holmes. She wielded her sexuality as an additional weapon to surpass him. She cheated and brought a gun to a boxing match.

This is why The Woman had no chance with Sherlock Holmes. She wielded her sexuality as an additional weapon to surpass him. She cheated and brought a gun to a sparring session.

Eggs are expensive and sperm are cheap. This is a generic rule for the majority. Funnily enough, when a woman mates like a man (sleeps around) she is being treated exactly as her behaviour implies, namely, that her reproductive standards are cheap – like a man.

The true double standard is expecting to be treated as a good girl while acting like a bad one.