Video: Snobbery

Snobs can’t judge the content of character to a person, so they must rest on the superficial, the signalled.
All status signallers are snobs.

Snobs are phony intellectuals.

They can’t discern quality, they lack those traits. They judge wealth, and other trappings of reward. They trust a third party opinion (judges, experts, authorities) more than their own and model like a child, from these. It’s mainstream, it’s safe, it’s very Goldilocks to have someone to look down on and someone else to suck up to.

They cannot discriminate quality, so they sneer at ‘discrimination’.

The Middle Class, who think good blood doesn’t matter, because they have none. The new snob, a rejection of blood and acceptance of any identity pretense, however flimsy. They cannot step out from their herd, they cannot be individual and they cannot be creative. They live in permanent fear of rejection. They seek to compete by spotting the creative, but this descended into shock-value politics, an artistic game of chicken. They are the Emperor of no clothes and have nothing. Most are in debt to look rich. They bought no opportunities and a heap of depression and anxieties. If their inheritance legally relied upon legitimacy, they’d quickly care about blood all of a sudden.

The Ikea caste.

The guy drawing attention to his Rolex and bragging about its mechanism doesn’t deserve to be wearing one. He doesn’t realize his target is the people who already know.

Geeks and Jocks, same coin

They always have been, where have you been?
It isn’t a gender-exclusive thing. It’s status signalling.

One of the biggest myths is that geeks are always harmless and never aggressive, but passive aggression is more insidious. The delta and gamma are the type of person who’ll get angry when you reject them, feel as if you owe them and do most of the serial killer stuff. The jocks will probably just shout and punch you in the face, then leave you alone. Geeks (and nerds) are not superior but they believe they are since they over-value intellect and pointless hobbies. Obsession is NOT a healthy thing. It isn’t the same as passion.

Just look at NRx modern aristocrat stuff.
They wear suits instead of sportswear. Same thing. All about peacock attraction because they’re the sex with less sexual options but more sexual desire.

Anyone who thinks they’re superior to you won’t make a good partner in anything, let alone life. And when they fail, they project, a lot. It’s never Mister Superior Intellect. There are plenty of jokes about Mrs Always Right but the male version is worse. All the bitchy, not even a woman.

It’s a way to compete dishonestly, covertly. As fake as those bulked up whey protein muscles, except they brag about all the books they read (and none of them surprising). As much signalling as the girls who brag about the popular title games they played.

The pretentious intellectual is worse than the gym bro, because at least the gym bro has external accomplishments and something to brag about. The pretentious intellectual reads the same books as everyone else and thinks they’re special for reading Dawkins, Greene and ‘old books’. Because who’d read that stuff if they couldn’t talk about it after? The pretentious people are hollow and have nothing original to offer, that is why they face constant rejection. They’re trying to imitate originality and getting angry when everyone is smarter than them.

They confuse shade with wit. Engage bitchiness, become respected Dr House.

Like, sure, they judge a woman as ‘worthy’ of his company and praise – if she completely agrees with him. Kant would be proud.

The Right is the new Left

I fear this.

I suppose cuck is a way to outgroup bandwagon jumpers looking for shekels to shill.

credit to

Right Is The New Left

cited in http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/07/trump-wins-europeans-will-grow/?_ga=1.48667302.1834135972.1469672001

 

Link: Forgiveness isn’t sainthood

http://lonerwolf.com/forgiveness-sainthood/

As a one-off? Probably healthy. Little things like forgetting your birthday or breaking a vase.

As a habit?

Something’s wrong, and it might be the person ‘forgiving’. In cases of learned helplessness, they always try to portray themselves as perfect and forgiving. In fact, they enable bad behaviours, encourage evil people by being a doormat and get off on being the victim.

It’s an excuse to indulge repeatedly in grossly destructive behaviour by denying personal agency and forgiving the Evil figure who caused it. The opposite of saintly (scapegoating). And trying to claim status points by signalling afterward? Worse than the person they’re supposedly forgiving, they play everyone.

You should forgive something if it is entirely in the past and doesn’t matter at all anymore.

Otherwise, it’s foolish, because the conditions aren’t finished yet.

No, the Left will not ‘wake up’ and be honest

A jihadi could be standing over them with a sword and they’d be babbling some apologia.

It’s insane. Quite literally. It denies reality.

http://www.scifiwright.com/2015/12/point-deer-make-horse

They’ve been proven wrong so roundly that denial is their sole recourse.

The consequences are coming home and they’re still playing Lynch Whitey (albeit online).

Just don’t save them. They wanted it, they got it. No mercy.

Video: Conservatism is the new counter-culture

I wish he’d said Cultural Marxism, name the beast and like a demon, you have control of it.
And it’s status signalling, that’s the research term. Virtue signalling was a journalist invention.
Nor does he mention it’s a means for middle class people to judge working class people without looking like raging bigots (because people with a real job don’t give a shit what the Guardian thinks). The culture war is a class war designed to change the poor via pop culture.

They keep losing arguments.

It doesn’t sink in.

They keep losing elections.

It doesn’t sink in.

I think the anti-speech laws were a turning point here (UK).
The classical liberals realized they were on the side of the censors.

Two key articles on this topic if you haven’t seen:

New Church Ladies

http://thoughtcatalog.com/jim-goad/2014/04/the-new-church-ladies/

Stepford Students

http://new.spectator.co.uk/2014/11/free-speech-is-so-last-century-todays-students-want-the-right-to-be-comfortable/

Adults are putting their foot down to entitled little shits and saying you have no high horse. We reject Standpoint Theory. We have the right to laugh at your student opinions. You can’t control us.

Video: How to destroy the world

Stefan is knocking it outta the park recently. Highest quality redpill stuff.
Who turned him onto us? Anyone know?

wow omg likey

TLDW: Social engineers are child abusers.

In one word, it comes down to Legacy. The legacy is the future.

You either have one, or you don’t. You eat the cake, or you keep the cake.
But it doesn’t last forever. Never kick the pup because the pup grows up.
We are reaching that tipping point. I saw a comment, I think it was on Vox Day’s blog, pointing out that by recreating the conditions of Weimar Germany in every system, it’s predictable what would happen next. But neolibs don’t listen to history, they’re on the Right Side… *snicker*

I treat you as a sentient intelligent lifeform. Objections?

He’s right that the quality of men dropped before the quality of women. I feel the manosphere forgets there is another half to the equation. Post-WW, the few surviving men lived it up. Then the Sexual Revolution just happened on by shortly thereafter because women felt left out and wanted some of the attention. Men lost their motivation because sex is practically all they want from women and…. yup, that’s pretty much it. This causes the economy to tank eventually and we’ve been building up bubbles ever since (look at the time you went off the Gold Standard to cover for it, LOOK) because men buy most of the shit needed for a family from a position of surplus and women, while easier to sell to, must buy on credit.

The manosphere mocks women for saying “Where have all the good men gone“? Answer: They’re Peter Pans at home playing video games and watching porn, the Lost Boys, which hardly reflects well on men as they think it does, while all the time most of their discussions feature “Where have all the good women gone“? without a trace of self-awareness. Answer: Pump and dumps, pretty much. Not Asia. Not S. America. You chucked them, or some other guy did, and now they’re psychologically ruined by it.

n.b.

Maternal instinct isn’t a myth. It’s much like paternal drive in men. Some have it, some have it strongly and some do not have it at all. Women are dumb enough to freely admit where they lie there, oblivious to how it affects their long-term value: are you pro-choice? They can only answer for themselves and only the women who state the rape/cancer exception are permissible.

p.p.s.

Gold Standard in America: 1971. I’m sure that’s a maaaa-ssive coincidence.
UK: 1934. WW1 made us broke. However, we had similar problems:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_British_national_debt#1970s

The crisis was seen as a national humiliation.

Guardian neoliberal hypocrisy on Syrian “refugees”

Accept more asylum seekers and increase support for refugee migrants in the UK

has 429,201 signatures. I won’t link it’s been all over MSM and that’s all they have?

Meanwhile;

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/106997

Allow Britons to open their homes to refugees affected by the Syrian conflict

We the undersigned pledge to offer our homes to refugees and to support their living in the UK until they can return. The British are more willing and able to help than our Government chooses to admit.

368 signatures.

throw head back laughter george jungle

Now that’s a red pill to swallow.

Elsewhere, another petition has accrued the necessary 100k signatures to be discussed in Parliament and get a Government response: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/106477

Yes, it’s the one I linked you to the other day, and now it’s gained 70k since, having had no help or signal boosting from the MSM….

Stop allowing immigrants into the UK

We don’t own the country to give away to “refugees”

And neither do we owe them anything.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3223828/PETER-HITCHENS-won-t-save-refugees-destroying-country.html

Actually we can’t do what we like with this country. We inherited it from our parents and grandparents and we have a duty to hand it on to our children and grandchildren, preferably improved and certainly undamaged.

It is one of the heaviest responsibilities we will ever have. We cannot just give it away to complete strangers on an impulse because it makes us feel good about ourselves.

Every one of the posturing notables simpering ‘refugees welcome’ should be asked if he or she will take a refugee family into his or her home for an indefinite period, and pay for their food, medical treatment and education.

If so, they mean it. If not, they are merely demanding that others pay and make room so that they can experience a self-righteous glow. No doubt the same people are also sentimental enthusiasts for the ‘living wage’, and ‘social housing’, when in fact open borders are steadily pushing wages down and housing costs up…..

Hang the r-types.
They wouldn’t be seen dead helping white people.
Send the entirety of the bill to those who signed the traitorous petition.

applause clap clapping yes well done