Count the ways that apply to the West and yes, aiding these is treason.
Gold mine, this interview.
We are losing the means of production to more ruthless countries in the Far East, and we are running out of natural resources. Unrest in far away countries have started cramping our wanderlust—quick now, 2017 might be your last chance to see the Louvre, the Pyramids and the beaches of Pattaya! And speaking of Pattaya, sexually transmitted diseases are quickly becoming immune to treatment, thus limiting us even in our choices of partners, and in their numbers, automatically unwinding the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s.
He gets it.
Mark Stein said “The future belongs to those who show up,” and as Evola noted, what we have to do now is to hold out, to “ride the tiger,” to “remain standing in the ruins,” to (as Rod Dreher posited) take the Benedict Option and become neo-monastics. And have children, of course. Lots and lots of children.
We need real intellectuals to replace the Cultural Marxists, once the ivory tower falls.
I’m going somewhere with this.
the cuck is #1
- To practice petty loyalty and thereby betray a larger loyalty;
Ooh, game theory related.
I think of it from the reverse perspective.
If you want to know how to beat your opposite at chess, you imagine yourself as your opponent.
Well, SJWs are pushing this, the rhetoric that becomes policy.
SJWs project. They project their greatest fears into reality: everyone who disagrees is Hitler, free speech is bigoted because reality is unequal and the physical problem is White people.
OK. So their problem is White people. What should those people do to dispense with the temporary enemy?
If we trash their belief system it will never take hold again. It took them decades to march through the institutions like this and now we know the enemy, we can name the enemy and have preventative strategies against their entryism. They’re cornered and they know it. They’ve turned on one another like cannibals to last a little longer as the money tap dries up.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Europe, in particular, has a long history of tribal alliance and putting aside our differences to deal with a common enemy. Our sense of fair play and the Rules of Englishmen are Euro-conventions, nowhere else in the world are they capable of this cooperation. Neither are we without guile. The man who wrote the book on manipulation was Italian. There are many slumbering giants among us. Every generation has them. These people are not narcissists and will not be found on a Youtube channel, peddling a blog with supplement ads or e-books. They’re out there IRL doing things. They have the skills we need. Think of it like a superhero team. Individually, we might get taken down. Collectively, with our strengths, we’re invincible (and yes, I count Russia, Western Russia). We shouldn’t assume that silence is tacit agreement, and the common man is against us, that’s SJW programming. To make us feel isolated. Many people want to do something and have no idea what. They need a positive vision. A peaceful action plan. Something inspiring.
The SJWs, with their ‘critical theory’ of nagging and bitching, could never compete.
Inspiration is a joke to them.
What strikes fear in collectivists?
A bigger crowd.
These problems are not going away. Their Orwellian command of language (Diversity is unity, a true strength) and books like Rules for Radicals, along with their mastery of protests and public influence at debates, have trounced the Right. Objecting politely is the blunt tool of cuckservatives, with no idea what they’re meant to be preserving. You could have a diverse table of European weeaboos, Europhiles and Anglophiles, they can dress and speak and act however they want, embrace the culture, they’ll never be European. Fighting a cultural battle is giving the enemy ground, because they have been slowly infiltrating the bastions of intellectual standard. Remember, when run by conservatives, Universities used to be good. [OT: And here, totally free, which really pisses off the Leftists when you remind them. They could justify the costs because standards were high and hardly anyone attended. The economy thrived and wages were higher because few people abroad were competing.]
They’ve been successfully executing a divide and conquer strategy on White people for decades.
By sex, nation, sexuality, anything to avoid the racial element. Anything that makes us turn on each other is aggression away from them, the cause. Let’s you and him fight. No more.
If you accept the premise of your enemy’s tactics without question, you accept defeat.
Why not try the opposite? Things can hardly get worse, can they? Realistically?
It matters because one thing doesn’t negate the other. White Nationalism doesn’t have to negate individual ethnic nationalism or identity. White Nationalism is possible as a temporary arrangement. As a tactic.
We are at war. We are being targeted as a whole, because we are White. Other groups have always defined us as “the White man”, that is all they see, they couldn’t care less about your special unique culture. This is not an individual issue about the fate of France, but not Spain, of Ireland but not Austria. It’s all of us together at the same time. Europeans are being targeted as a group. So we MUST respond as a group.
White Nationalism doesn’t have to be a permanent arrangement. We don’t have to erase Denmark to save Europe, but what good will it do to Denmark if the rest of Europe is lost but only it remains?
What happens at the end of a tournament? You go home.
What happens at the end of a fight? The victor goes home.
The conditions of war make the exceptions of peacetime.
Last time, depending on what you count, either Vienna, the Crusades or Vlad the Impaler pretending to be batshit saved Europe from the current threat. Also, for wording, can we stop using extremism? Extreme beliefs mean nothing. Communists are extreme on property. The SJWs are using it as a synonym for terrorism (a criminal act) and we’re letting them. Soon having certain extremist beliefs will be enough, in pre-crime logic. They have a sliding scale of ‘fascism’ and we shouldn’t feed it. We are not reporters or biased journalists. Say what you mean, say Muslim terrorism.
Name the enemy. Mention Leftists secrets like the Progressive Stack, and how Muslims are at the top. Mention the soft bigotry of low expectations. Read their books, learn their linguistic tricks.
Keep it peaceful. Keep it positive.
While that’s still an option.
Not too many people, I expect, will want to follow my prescription; not too many of my family members, or friends, or acquaintances, or you who are reading this. And that’s fine because, as I have learned over and over again, there is no strength in numbers. Quite the opposite: the probability of any given trick working is in inverse proportion to the number of times it is tried, or the number of people who try it. And so, if you are reading along and think “I can’t possibly do this because of [insert lame excuse]!” then—good! Fine with me. Fewer people equals more oxygen.
This can apply on a cerebral level too. I frequently stack things slightly in my favour when there’s no reason and little effort. It might appear pointless, but if you’re backed into a corner (think of it like a chess game) you never know which of those advantages could come good.
The quality of bouncing back is called grit, it’s more of a perseverance and I like this anti-fragile idea.
The innocuous looking guy to the left has just been recently voted one of Britain’s greatest ever foes.
Click the picture into a new window for amusing musical accompaniment.
The task facing him was not inconsiderable. How do you beat the worlds greatest superpower with nothing more than a few guns toted by eager youths, a lot of local good will and nothing much else? And yet that is what he did.
Michael Collins is arguably one of the greatest commanders in history. His greatness lays not in his ultimate achievement, rather, in the obstacles he had to overcome to attain it. Obstacles that would have overwhelmed nearly all other mortal men. It was the ultimate challenge; Man vs British Empire.
Michael Collins recognised that the way to take on the British Army was not to take it on directly (which would be suicidal) but to engage it on his terms. The way to fight it was unconventionally. Playing the traditional media’s game is to engage it conventionally. Thus, in my opinion, the manosphere should discount any advice about courting mainstream publicity and resist it as best as it can. The aim is to engage in cultural guerrilla warfare. The medium through which this warfare must be fought is the internet, a forum where the media has virtually no control on the subject matter.