Putting women off breeding

I wonder if white women were more likely to be denied?

For once, racial data not gathered? …or published?

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2020/mar/03/women-in-labour-being-refused-epidurals-official-inquiry-finds#maincontent

She added: “We have spoken with many women who have been so traumatised by their experience of childbirth that they are considering ending what would otherwise be wanted pregnancies.

Socialism cares!

“Staffing shortages may be an issue but we also know women may experience gatekeeping by healthcare professionals and be told labour ‘is meant to be hard work’,” she added.

remember when they called nuns pure evil for refusing unwed mothers pain relief?

The child is more likely to die if the mother is stressed. Same with the mother.

 “It is both inhumane and discriminatory.”

But in January, a Sunday Telegraph investigation claimed some women were being denied epidurals because of what the paper said was a “cult of natural childbirth” in some NHS Trusts.

Cult of saving money. That’s torture.

Dr David Bogod, a council member of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and a consultant at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS trust with a special interest in obstetrics, said midwives sometimes wrongly told women there was a narrow window in which they could have an epidural: when the cervix is between 4cm and 6cm dilated. “But it’s never too early and never too late [for an epidural], if that’s what a woman wants,” he said.

I’ve heard that too.

You can have it later to relieve the mother so the baby doesn’t have a heart attack.

Bogod said that “there’s reasonable, anecdotal evidence that some midwives will use the excuse that an anaesthetist isn’t available if they themselves feel an epidural isn’t appropriate for the woman based on their own beliefs around intervention-free births”.

Sadists. They lie.

“The national standard is that a woman should be given an epidural within 30 minutes to one hour of asking for it, except in exceptional circumstances,” he said. “Labour wards are amply supplied with anaesthetists and so that isn’t an unreasonable target for us.

They paid for the service. Never trust socialists.

“The commonest reason for women to be denied an epidural is because of a lack in midwife numbers: we have a drastic national shortage of midwives,” he added. The NHS in England is short of the equivalent of almost 2,500 full-time midwives.

Train natives.

Bogod pointed to the scandals at Telford’s Princess Royal and the Royal Shrewsbury hospitals, and Morecambe Bay, where babies and mothers died preventable deaths at least partly because midwives had a focus on making women giving birth without medical intervention.

Primitive. That’s murder.

And you wonder why married women aren’t having as many kids?

Maternal mortality has gone UP in America, for example.

And if it’s born healthy

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/mar/04/uk-in-danger-of-failing-a-generation-says-child-health-study

English teenagers are increasingly likely to be injured in youth violence and the UK is lagging behind other European countries on measures including infant mortality, according to UK-wide research into the state of child health by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

Our NHS.

Socialism makes the problems WORSE.

It found that the health of children who live in deprived areas is largely worse than those in more prosperous places and that inequalities have widened since 2017.

Possible but non-white kids have worse health outcomes in general, especially mixed.

The college said the slide in conditions was rarely seen in developed countries

Because we imported them and their shitty genetics.

Infant mortality here only higher in POLAND (who also have been putting women off breeding).

Yet UK infant mortality rates have stalled, and in England they actually got worse between 2016 and 2017. For a high-income nation such as ours, that should be a major wakeup call.”

Importing midwives from low IQ nations like Jamaica may be to blame!?

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/08/18/white-immigrants-are-still-r-types/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/08/22/observe-the-r-type-quietly-panic/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/06/22/population-data/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/11/15/tiger-mom-hypergamy-poland-sub-fertility/

Just read that last one if you’re impatient.

Polish women in FACT are not traditional mother types, they’re r-types. If you look at EU-collected data on Polish women and their real opinions in surveys.

Adolescent Premature Ovarian Insufficiency Following Human Papillomavirus Vaccination

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4528880/

choice quote:

Vaccine research does not present an ovary histology report of tested rats but does present a testicular histology report. 

Another;

Enduring ovarian capacity and duration of function following vaccination is unresearched in preclinical studies, clinical and postlicensure studies.

Unresearched. Injecting it into all the little girls with thick parents, unresearched whether the ovaries still operate or the ORGANS shut down. aka partial organ failure

Since this group includes all prepubertal and pubertal young women, demonstration of ongoing, uncompromised safety for the ovary is urgently required. This matter needs to be resolved for the purposes of population health and public vaccine confidence.

2014

Feminists pushing this shit hate women.

Timely reminder for when they try to force these things on you/r loved ones.

UT Austin Researchers File SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Patent

LIKE. CLOCKWORK.

“February 19, 2020 – Researchers from The University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced a critical breakthrough toward developing a vaccine for the novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19).”

Why DO they want so many immigrants?

case study of a 16yo girl:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23035167

and Human papilloma virus vaccine and primary ovarian failure: another facet of the autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23902317

CONCLUSION:

We documented here the evidence of the potential of the HPV vaccine to trigger a life-disabling autoimmune condition. The increasing number of similar reports of post HPV vaccine-linked autoimmunity and the uncertainty of long-term clinical benefits of HPV vaccination are a matter of public health that warrants further rigorous inquiry.

Great news for misogynists everywhere. Real ones.

All three patients experienced a range of common non-specific post-vaccine symptoms including nausea, headache, sleep disturbances, arthralgia and a range of cognitive and psychiatric disturbances. According to these clinical features, a diagnosis of primary ovarian failure (POF) was determined which also fulfilled the required criteria for the ASIA syndrome.

Explains some women I’ve met.

ASIA = autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26125978

A link between human papilloma virus vaccination and primary ovarian insufficiency: current analysis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW:

Reviews are good.

The cause of primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) is multifactorial. Known causes include external factors such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals, infections that lead to a permanent insult to the ovary, autoimmune conditions, and genetic causes. An association between the quadrivalent antihuman papilloma vaccine (HPV4) and POI was recently suggested.

“antihuman”

The birth rate cult ought not to get their hopes up.

Q is, if the vaccine is so bad, what about the manwhores spreading the ‘organic’ version?

Credit: Master Brew

When do we outlaw sluts on population threat grounds?

RECENT FINDINGS:

An increasing number of cases of POI post-HPV4 are being reported. Possible mechanisms for the suspected effect of HPV on female reproductive function are a toxic effect or an autoimmune response. The trigger could be the vaccine immunogen contents or the adjuvants, the latter are used to increase the immune reaction.

increase, not produce

The adjuvant in HPV4 contains aluminum.

Yeah, still using it. Despite claims.

Animal models have shown aluminum exposure to inhibit expression of female reproductive hormones and to induce histologic changes in the ovaries.

I haz reasons for my quotes.

Specific genetic compositions may be more susceptible to developing an autoinflammatory syndrome after exposure to an environmental factor.

Bioweapon, by any other name.

SUMMARY:

The mechanisms responsible for POI are not yet fully understood. Although case reports cannot establish causation, awareness of a possible link between HPV4 and POI will help to identify and manage future cases that may arise.

They want people scared right now but don’t lose sight of the facts.

Don’t take any NWO shit. It’s going to be forced anyway. Rape with an object, legally.

They can claim e.g. one single paper from 2018 was “retracted” (impossible once peer-reviewed)

https://www.precisionvaccinations.com/impact-hpv-vaccination-women-fertility-study-retracted

but that doesn’t change the hundreds of other studies documenting the same thing.

This study written by Gayle DeLong,  an associate professor at Baruch College, concluded that ‘Results suggest that females who received the HPV shot were less likely to have ever been pregnant than women in the same age group who did not receive the shot.’ 

Scientism people are stupid. You should want a follow-up.

YES. I AM ALWAYS THE ONLY ONE WHO DOES THE BLOODY READING.

The problem with meditation rituals +IQ

Not meditation as in thought, contemplation but the Indian-seeming ritual.

Not yoga, which is a made-up substitute religion sold to Boomers, I already linked about that (it was in the New Yorker too).

Skip to the end at the IQ bit if you don’t care about genetic load and IQ as a related tangent.

New Age meditation is for rich people to pretend they have problems. If they were spiritual at all, they’d quit their vices. They would see how vice harms them and their soul. They connect with nothing real. It’s a hallucination projected on their bubble.
Meditation as it’s sold in the West is an opiate for idiots, they’re already mindless drones of conformity. As a form of prayer, it’s egocentric (muh Higher Self – do you mean Holy Spirit?). As a biological thing, Muh Scientism, it over-develops the parietal lobe (a bad thing, sloth ensues, fine if you’re a mountain man?) at the expense of the frontal lobe (a VERY bad thing, they’re crippling their critical thinking, humans need that rationality). An IQ study in fully developed adults who start meditation would be interesting, but they’d never be able to find a publisher* for the fact, with a good method, IQ would go down. Imagine all the products they couldn’t sell! The horror!

*Why you never hear the downsides of many antisocial practices, but meditation does reduce in-group loyalty, which “they” actually want (less genophilia, less love of your family where it should be, with your KIN). Phrased like that, the “love” rhetoric falls flat. If you cannot love your kin, you don’t love. Anyone.

Can Meditation Increase IQ?

Though no standardized test was developed as a result, the study interestingly demonstrated head size has almost nothing to do with intelligence.

True.

Also, women can have larger heads than men and the men who don’t get this… are morons.

IQ is simply a good method for representing intelligence in an individual, compared to the general population. IQ testing has its limits, but there is a reason for its sustained and wide acceptance in psychology.

You have to act on your IQ. Bitching on reddit how “misunderstood” you are is worse than being average.

Genuine intelligence does seek out truth though, not just info to show off.

The biggest contributors, such as…

  • Genetics
  • Conditions in utero
  • Experiences at a very young age

…were never much under our control.

Yes, an individual’s IQ score can vary mildly throughout life, and more can almost always be learned, but there is simply very little evidence that intelligence itself can be increased over time.

It can’t. Anyone who says otherwise is selling you something. Most of it’s genetic.

Attention gains are often just using the idiot-phone less and avoiding EMF.

Think about it – where do they meditate? Low EMF areas. What don’t they do? Check their phone every five minutes. It isn’t the ritual. Put down the Apple products.

So wherever you are in the distribution, whether or not you’ve even taken an IQ test, is where you’ve been from a young age and where you will stay.

It’s a big pill to swallow.

That’s the main red pill. Most men in particular refute this and become full-blown sociologists (sociologist fallacy) going on and on about nurture-theories. Noooope.

DNA is destiny, dude.

Plus, logically, if your score were already high… you wouldn’t feel a need to increase it?

Hey, I’m just being rational, pretty sure that’s illegal. As a woman.

A study published by Dan Simons and colleagues looked at these brain training games, and only found:

  • Strong evidence of subjects improving in the trained tasks themselves. Meaning, the more they played the game, the better they got at the game.
  • Less evidence that subjects had improved performance at closely-related tasks.
  • Little evidence that the subjects increased performance on distant-related tasks (anything outside the game, in the real world) or enhanced their everyday cognition in general (meaning, no raise in IQ).

Let them profit off idiots. By going for that IQ boost stuff, you’re admitting you’re low IQ already.

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1529100616661983

It’s like men who take dating advice from other men, especially bachelors. At least talk to really old, happily married men? But noooooo. Or since the sexes are mentally different, talk to women about how they assess men to become the best competitor (and other men ARE your competition). …And they wonder why they attract angry, manjaw women – because they’re vibing with what another man told them.

Men also tend to give one another terrible advice, consciously or subconsciously to scupper competition. Rarely even trust relatives, same fact sadly holds with women.

Money shot:

Meditation can’t increase intelligence because there is little evidence intelligence can be increased by anything at all.

That’s it, that’s the fact.

ANYTHING. AT ALL.

Stop looking.

However, meditation can help you increase your IQ score by sharpening your mind and maximizing your ability to focus.

No such thing. Marketing gimmick you cannot measure (see study above, no real results, self-report is crap). ADD is also bullshit, it’s the new dyslexia (as Spectator leaked) for describing low IQ offspring to narcissistic parents who also refused to discipline their brain as babies and toddlers (easy to spot, the baby holding an iPad). You cannot have an attention deficit, that would make you a vegetable, in a COMA. It’s an alternative state of consciousness like anesthesia, which literally winds down your attention to a deficit aka below consciousness (it can be measured by EEG). They literally give the kids amphetamines, club drugs, because a key sign of low IQ in kids is low energy, listlessness, ennui (side effect arrogant atheism), later called “failure to thrive” (as spiteful mutants) since the mutation load doesn’t process for energy in the body effectively. Think about it – they’re only slow, compared to the genetically healthy norm of age peers. Again, their genetic inferiority -compared to the norm population of the parents requires them to take SPEED.

What is the Amphetamine Speed?

“The amphetamine speed is actually a “slang” name for the entire class of drugs known as amphetamines. All amphetamines, whether legal or illegal, activate chemical processes throughout the brain and body and so “speed up” most every bodily function.”

They have degenerated that far down. The drug category of speed. Why would energy level drugs “help” unless the root issue is genetic?

esp when the effects inc.

  • Loss of interest in sex
  • Impotence
  • Restlessness
  • Irritability
  • Agitation

Adderall

Impotence and no libido is great for depopulation efforts. But they want the low IQ to be productive workers for the companies.

But isn’t a supposed symptom of ADHD already the last three?

Yeah, don’t expect logic. Low IQ people often self-medicate with drugs anyway. It’s the dirty little secret of drug addicts. They often lack the full frontal lobe function for impulse control. Making it legal makes them worse, it enables them.

How can we tell it’s genetic? Look for a paternal age effect. All fathers biologically contribute is DNA.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/aging-dads-more-likely-to-have-kids-with-autism-adhd-schizophrenia-and-more/

ding ding ding

Researchers examined all births that happened in Sweden between 1973 and 2001, and found a child born to a 45-year-old dad was 25 times more likely to have bipolar disorder, 13 times more likely to have ADHD, 3.5 times more likely to have autism, 2.5 times more likely to exhibit suicidal behavior or a substance abuse problem, and twice as likely to have a psychotic disorder like schizophrenia when compared to kids born to a 24-year-old father.

13x more likely past middle age

13, men have a right to be told this stuff in Sex Ed, family planning is important

and yes paternal is a bigger risk:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/older-dads-may-increase-childs-health-risks-more-than-older-moms/

the real QED? missing link:

https://www.webmd.com/baby/news/20090309/older-fathers-lower-iq-in-kids#1

Children born to older fathers don’t perform as well on tests of thinking skills during infancy and early childhood, while those born to older mothers have higher scores on the same tests, a study shows.

Ouch.

It’s like how single parent fathers also have kids with crap outcomes and test scores. The manosphere is in serious, life-ruining denial. Any single parent is a crap-shoot. Men have a right to know this young, to prepare.

The reason for this discrepancy is simple and evolutionary.

In fathers, early breeding (20s) is a sign he can mature faster than peers and lock down a quality woman earlier. He’s just a better man. Sorry.

Society shouldn’t enable dysgenic men to breed at all, especially in the teens. Also, sorry. But social policy matters here.

Women settle earlier, the lazier they are (dysgenic, r-select) from less discernment, the feminine trait. High IQ women complete education first, before assortative mating with a man in their class and general IQ band (eugenic, K). Child IQ maps most onto maternal IQ, as previously linked about if you search. The mother is the one raising it, don’t choose a bimbo. Also, her DNA having a high mutation load in utero will hamper the kid’s IQ regardless of the father. You’ll note in men with more than one wife, the kids with the wife who settled later are smarter, she’s more feminine and discerning. Women prepare for marriage and kids too. You need a woman who isn’t just a breeding sow. A woman who takes kids seriously and wants them, not a meal ticket. Avoid the Meghans.

McGrath’s team analyzed data from a large study called the U.S. Collaborative Perinatal Project, which recruited pregnant women from 12 sites in the U.S. from 1959 to 1965. The data from this ongoing project has been a “treasure trove” for researchers, McGrath says.

His team looked at more than 33,000 children born between 1959 and 1965 and then looked at their results on cognitive tests administered at ages 8 months, 4 years, and 7 years. The tests evaluated the children’s ability to think and reason, measuring such skills as concentration, learning, speaking, reading, arithmetic, memory, and motor skills such as coordination.

Finally, they looked for links with the father’s age, the mother’s age, and in one analysis also adjusted for socioeconomic factors such as family income and parental education.

The average age of the fathers in the study was 28.4 and ranged from 14 to 66. The mother’s average age was 24.8 and ranged from 12 to 48.

same average as the middle ages

In recent years, according to the paper, it has become very common for couples to delay having children until their late 30s.

They’re falsely told it makes the kids smarter, only in the case of good genetics (and so higher natural IQ), solid education before (no Marxism) and only the woman (who can then raise the kid better). Men constantly regenerate gametes so mutate in a compounding way. Their DNA becomes more mutated with age. Eventually it’ll be seen as child abuse to delay on purpose too long (when you already found the right person and have your health). Women are born with most of our eggs for this reason, to maintain the species. What’s eugenic in a woman is dysgenic in a man, the sexes are opposites! This gives men incentives to improve his tribe. Nature doesn’t hate you, it’s a challenge and men are failing by assuming they’re like women.

The older the father, the more likely the child was to score lower on the tests, except for one measure of motor skills.

When they looked at the mother’s age, however, they found that the older the mother, the higher the children scored on the thinking skills tests. (That finding, reported in earlier studies as well, may be due to a more nurturing home environment if the mother is older, but this study suggests children of older fathers don’t reap the same benefit.)

I love how they try to nurture it away. Nope. It’s biological mainly.

However, when the researchers adjusted for such factors as the parents’ socioeconomic status, including income and education, it modified the effect of both parents’ ages on the intelligence tests. For instance, the average score on the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale was nearly 6 points lower for children born to fathers age 50 compared to those born to fathers age 20. But when the socioeconomic factors were taken into account, the difference dropped to 2.2 points.

Incentives for high IQ men. Only low IQ men complain about fitness tests.

While the study findings may suggest the best combination of parents is an older woman with a younger man, McGrath says it’s too early to make any specific recommendations.

Suuuuure, PC liar. Protect those feels at all costs! Baby-killers.

They don’t mean by much, a few years, but modern men commonly lack any maturity to have a commitment in their twenties. I have noticed a trend of older women (5,10 years) settling with younger men, though. They also seem oddly fertile? The birth rate cult must take serious note of this. Older men regret not freezing their sperm but the egg freezing jokes are misplaced. Gametes degrade vastly faster in men. Sorry, you’re not like women?

If you really care about fixing sub-replacement fertility, look at what the data says is ideal and not your ego.

What’s behind the link between older fathers and lower IQ? “There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that the sperm of older dads develop more mutations, that is, spelling mistakes in the DNA code,” McGrath says. His team is researching this idea further in animal studies comparing young mice with older ones.

ding ding ding genetic load

Their train of thought is the same as mine.

They’re avoiding getting this out in case more men take paternity leave they don’t deserve (since men can’t give birth and have nothing to recover from medically). They’ll tiptoe around old guy’s feels about impotence even if it gives their eventual, panic spawn a low IQ and bipolar disorder. Don’t pin your hopes on having grandkids in that case, what a waste.

They don’t wanna get sued, so they won’t tell men how serious this is. Better have no kids than invest in a sickly one and have no grandkids. But Big Pharma doesn’t like that.

We have known about the paternal age effect for many years,” says Harry Fisch, MD, director of the Male Reproductive Center and director of urologic microsurgery at Columbia University Medical Center of New York Presbyterian Hospital. Yet, he says, “We are just starting to scratch the surface.”

Testosterone levels begin to decline slowly at age 30, Fisch says. Ideally, men should father children “sooner rather than later,” he says.

No, supplements aren’t bio-available the way real T is. Your DNA is still being damaged.

“The 20s and early 30s are ideal, but real life intervenes,” he says, making that time frame not feasible due to lack of a partner, difficulty getting pregnant, financial restraints, or a host of other factors.

Fix the economy so high IQ men can settle in their 20s. Stop forcing them to fund the kids of the feckless men.

That’ll sort sub-replacement fertility AND the spiteful mutants won’t bother anyway. People are not genetically equal. Spiteful mutants actually think they can have kids and avoid being a parent. You can’t just hand the kid to the mother 100% and act like a bachelor. Then the kids won’t give you grandkids out of actual spite, as happens to narcissistic parents. Abandonment is abuse, and that includes Don Draper careerism.

In a perspective on the study, published in the same issue of PLoS Medicine, Mary Cannon, MD, of the Royal College of Surgeons in Dublin, Ireland, says it is important to take socioeconomic factors into account when looking at the effect of a father’s age (as well as a mother’s).

IQ predicts SES so no. Shut up, Mary.

Men reap as they sow. They wanted to shirk patriarchy first. The ‘Sexual Revolution’ killed patriarchy in part by making it kill itself. Yes, waste your best sperm jacking it to porn, you’re free. Your sperm will be super potent for autism by the time you figure it out. Wait until they find out all those clubbing STDs make mutations more damaging.

Is it a coincidence the Boomers are the first generational product of ‘free love’? I think not. I have a pet theory the bad type of Boomer’s father picked up STDs during the war from brothels (men were enticed to attend by YKW) and warped their brain development by passing to the mother. The military won’t do that study.

Back to meditation.

The frontal lobe issues “muh concentration, et al.” are low IQ, from their heavy genetic load; the dumbness, the dense quality of them is a symptom of the IQ range. AKA being thick. Attention is filtered by your brain structure and informed by genetics.

from top:

It’s there at that maximum level of focus where you are the smartest you can possibly be. But unfortunately, neither meditation, or anything else, can increase where that limit is.

Denial of humanity is narcissism, denial of human limits. Pure egocentrism, spiritual bypassing for the ritualists.

It’s funny how both groups (New Agers and ADD/ADHD excuse-makers) are often also IQ denialists, while simultaneously wanting to ‘boost’ the thing they claim doesn’t exist? Deny mutation load, bitches. When we can test for it at birth, welcome to Gattaca. IQ tends to predict certain personality traits e.g. laziness, so people would actually be happier. Telling everyone we’re genetically equal makes the stupid miserable. They assume the system is against them, actually their parents.

Many relaxation symptoms of meditation rituals are just coping with a coffee addiction, mostly Starbucks, which they never drop. They love Starbucks more than any God. The breathing exercise kind isn’t meditation. It’s most commonly fighting a histamine, pesticide, GMO and/or mycotoxin response from a bad diet and sleep pattern. It’s suppressing your immune system from healing the damage. Like mega-dosing antioxidants means those free radicals can’t kill the cancer in you – so the cancer kills you. Stop trying to fix your biology, the train is fine.

They never mention that parietal/frontal issue but cranial space is at a premium, when one part grows, another is damaged and atrophies. When a person is stressed, they must address the causes in their life, rather than hoping for some genie to wing it for them. Opening your mind up invites all sorts of trauma and bad karma in, like opening your front door and leaving it unguarded overnight. Guard your heart, your mind and your soul. Cynically, the New Age people probably know what they’re doing, and they’re injuring the competition. Do not assume their sincerity. Most New Agers are deeply intellectually dishonest and they rip one another off all the time. A person who believes in moral absolutes and karma would never! Avoid the communal narcissists who are basically cult leaders. In another time they’d be leading witch trials for a girl who rejected them. If their object is material, that’s an abuse of the spiritual. Look at the vice in their personal life, where it cannot hide. Drink, drug, debauchery problems? They help no one, they are Will O Wisps guiding you to your own destruction. Siren songs are not a myth. They constantly travel, to hide from themselves? They seem weirdly lonely and depressed when not distracted by travel? Don’t take their life advice, they cannot be happy. The particular reasons for them don’t matter. Don’t let it be your problem. Spiteful mutants are nomads. They cannot settle – in a job, in a country, by marriage. They’ll search until they die.

Meditation amplifies your emotion, the way it’s packaged now to rich people will be interesting as they lose their fortunes. Especially Boomers, with no time to recoup or ability to compete in the Brave New Multicultural World they generally voted to import in. Sorry Boomer, you’re too white and male to be manager this time! Here’s your AA boss.

They haven’t tried it from a state of loss and deprivation, but a bubble of delusion and “I deserve this”. Meditating from any bad place, as a ritual, is like the surest way to become suicidal. New Agers know but never talk about this. If you ask around, people know this commonly but the topic gets banned or taken down. It’s ritualised rumination. Rumination is actively bad for your health (unless your health is already bad and you mistake normal for good).

That’s a cult indicator, forbidden bad experience discussion, it puts off new recruits.

They prefer to shame people for bad results, like that’s the first person it ever happened to.

(There’s drug abuse purging from the body years after the fact, a common cause of sudden health problems and ‘depression’ or ‘anxiety’ in celebrities. It takes years for drugs to fully leave all the organs. Who cares?)

Tiger Mom hypergamy + Poland sub-fertility

Poland stuff is at the end.

That was the deal. Asians aren’t Christians, they lack the altruism genes.

For richer, for poorer is an idea.

Plus, if you marry down economically for looks (hypergamy) then you entered a financial contract on the basis of your starting income. When it dips, her looks don’t change but suddenly you provide less value (plus Asian princess syndrome social shame, saving face stigma pressure to leave) so she’ll retract her end and cash out before you go completely bust. Collectivists are not individualists. They value what you give, not family ties. They ghost their own blood relations.

The pretend naivete is most insulting. The focus is not husband (like Christianity) but kids. Guy’s a glorified sperm donor, they don’t actually respect you (why the aged Asian shrew henpecking her husband and beating kids with a shoe is infamous) it’s all about looking the part (communal narcissism).

Stupid beta doesn’t know she planned her exit, like timing the market.

She wanted little meal ticket to take back to Japan.

Bear in mind, mix Asian/White marriages have higher rates of domestic abuse (it could come from her) but also divorce, compared to Asian/Asian, so you couldn’t do better.

“Non-confrontational” – passive-aggressive

“kept to herself” – hated you

“misunderstandings with parents” – hated the people with your best interests at heart, attempt to isolate you from them (she related to Jolie?)

“she viewed explanations as arguments” – so…. Asian, culturally. They just repeat bullshit until you cave. Then they fake-out walking away only to come back a few times. The only thing most of them don’t do is stamp their feet. They’re not used to being told “No”. Narcs view normal boundaries e.g. don’t shout in my ear, as offensive to them.

“if I took an hour a day to explain” – she isn’t that stupid, nobody is

“she avoided it” stonewalling, another Asian specialty, again they freeze out relatives with bad reputation socially for trivial or even good reasons like individuality or not paying the family leech

Someone please school the Asian betas, this is absurd.

“I knew this, I specifically told her – you cannot save up your anger” it’s called resentment and it’s the biggest predictor of divorce, don’t marry a spiteful bitch, however nice the mask beforehand

Well, she got her revenge, didn’t she?

Seriously though I’m on his side. Anyone writing a special course on spotting Dark Triad in Asian women would make billions off that market. They fake their femininity until hubby looks insecure, then like any predator they strike to draw first blood. Narcs, for example, always assume you’ll betray them. She wasn’t expecting to die with him, hence withdrawing from his family, keeping distance so they had no info on her or emotional rapport.

Guy was played.

She married millionaire, then made bank. Gold digger.

He tolerated her passivity as femininity, probably, meaning he would later allow her to do a runner and never combat divorce proceedings. She knew this. She tested him for weakness for YEARS.

He learned nothing, he’s still talking about “initial attraction”. That excitement is mutually exclusive to compatibility. The fun ones are always crazy. Never fuck anyone crazier than you. The attraction is a bait, an act, totally a facade, their persona when you meet is FAKE as Bella Hadid’s tits. They mirror you and mould into your perfect One. BPDs and HPDs go further with cheating tests (while cheating themselves to see if you’re jealous), sadistic punishments and all sorts.

Personality disorder people are attractive in the same way as standing at a cliff edge- because of your death drive, intrigued by DANGER. Stop crossing the wires, guys! Are they: fascinating, individually, or fucked-up, mentally? Critical difference.

This is my PSA to advice I’d give male relatives, I’m in no danger zone and see a very different side to these women (Mean Girls). There’s no mask because there’s no gain from a woman (competition), it’s the real spite up front.

They isolate women for professional reasons, men for personal gain.

I’ve missed out of tons of opportunities because some bitch randomly hated me. I want you to thwart them. Women have no avenue. At least don’t be a chump?

He goes on about communication but did NONE of that himself. He still married her. He allowed her to be non-cooperative then married her.

“We would just – have fun”

Good-time girls make great ex-wives….

“if we thought there was anything we didn’t understand about the other person we just – ignored that stuff”

all his talk about communication was bullshit, then

that’s not a wife material you propose to, that’s an acquaintance you fuck

you don’t even do that to friends, but an awkward colleague – no emotional intimacy

deep down, he sensed they weren’t compatible, spiritually, amazing how men think with their dick

almost like you’re meant to make this decision with a clearer…. head

“If you understand the core of a person, that is always there”

but you just said-

you married a stranger you fuckwit

Narcissists don’t HAVE a core, either! Hollow people exist! Soulless people exist! People dead on the inside capable of faking it…. exist!

This gentlemen, is why men had arranged marriages. Your parents could see this shit a mile off and head off your impaired dick brain disorder.

The more he talks, the more I wanna punch him. He’s so vapid.

“If you marry for social status or appearance” – there’s some self-awareness there, scratching to get out!

ALAS NO.

He still thinks she has a core…. despite still not knowing it…

There’s nothing to know, idiot.

I’ve gone on dates with this kind of guy (one date, each) in the past because they actually got scared when a woman had emotional intelligence enough to express her dark side openly. They’d be scared of the girl who can clearly, politely communicate they’re annoyed by something but later you see them with a series of crazy bitches (their words, after) who put on the nice airhead act only to be rotten in reality and it’s like… wow. Actually they kinda deserve it. Women are not sugar and spice, get it through your thick skull, this isn’t an Austen novel. If a woman isn’t saying it, she’s thinking it …and that’s VERY dangerous – to you. Because rest assured, the talkative sex (a myth but OK) has a REASON for not voicing it – and that’s usually predatory.

Dating is meant to filter out bad matches early as possible. If you want fake, you get fake. With fake longevity.

Like, how do they expect a marriage should work? You never disagree? You can’t have an adult conversation? You can’t voice frustrations with anything, personally or politically? Do they think women knit away their anger? Does that sound healthy compared to a productive, sometimes fun talk? Vive la difference can be attractive. If they want a clone without the dick, they’re too insecure to marry anyone. Did they never learn the value of confrontation as a child? It teaches compromise. It establishes and protects boundaries, it respects both parties. You need to learn how to argue to fight your corner. Anger isn’t a bad emotion per se, it’s vital for survival. Do they want a codependent or apathetic ninny? Would she stand by them or get weak and panic when times get tough? They always do over decades. Have they ever spoken to successful, long-married couples? No.

Because if they did it’s about loyalty and that seems ferocious, sometimes. Passion isn’t for weaklings.

Marriage is the union of two individuals. You are not a jigsaw piece. Conflict happens. That’s why you state a vow publicly that you stand together and ENDURE the conflict.

A person who thinks you’re worth the argument will work on the marriage. This waifu clearly had no investment in him emotionally, she was probably incapable of it with any man – best to learn that early on? Can they securely attach? Men and women don’t do that lightly. Ya gotta earn it.

She literally pouted and hid like a small infant. He left her alone to mope like a dog, so he’s thick too. You can’t marry that and logically expect her to magically mature! She was emotionally retarded! Literally! That doesn’t just Go Away with pressure!

The why can’t girls be honest lot run when regular women are…. into the arms of… LIARS!

That’s…. that’s what happens. Good riddance if the idiots and the bitches leave the dating pool, actually. Maybe I shouldn’t observe, but I’ve heard the same from guys about idiot cousins, bitchy sisters etc.

The passive strategy (ghosting emotionally, stonewalling) is common among these women because with every interaction you might see their tactics, hear a word that sounds off-key or see a mask slip. They’re minimizing exposure to the prey while timing the attack.

Graham is earlier on in the same cycle. Loner guy openly brags he’s a millionaire and BOOM magically meets his soulmate…. sure. Sure you did.

Marry her too. Kids. The works. ….Morons. She’s mirroring you and your delusions of independence.

It’s like that pure cringe Talulah Riley video that was basically a meme, until the vid was taken down (and later re-posted) – the one in the kitchen where she slipped up and mask-slipped, saying she’d have married anyone who proposed quickly.

His feels were hurt but watch her eyes and sudden awkwardness. You can see the “I fucked up, damage control” in her face as she blinks heavily, face gets all twitchy, body all stiff, as she tries to decide what her face SHOULD look like and what her tone of voice SHOULD be and what line she SHOULD say to make him think she’s capable of empathy again.

IT’S THE SAME SHIT.

MEN WHY. 

top comment:

1) Complains about being his wife and dealing with his kids (wouldn’t wish taking care of them on her worst enemy)

2) Said she would have accepted a proposal from anybody

3) Says her parents were traumatized by “This whole experience”

4) Talks about how she’s thought of leaving him many times

MANOSPHERE TEACHES YOU NONE OF THIS SHIT. It isn’t even race-specific although they do vary the MO somewhat according to stereotype. This makes it easier to convince you of things, like to trust them.

I love how the next clip they cut to is his sportscar and she gets a ton of presents in a tower of boxes. Wow. The video editor was answering the reason she stayed with him with visual storytelling, it was Python-esque.

I treasure it. Unsung hero.

SPOT THE FAKE FEMININITY, PLEASE. The fewer crazy bitch divorce cases I hear about, the better.

e.g. all 4 explained:

previously claimed in an interview she wanted ten kids, balks and scoffs contemptuously, glares at and avoids five

soulmate mirroring ops, slips with the anybody (who’s a billionaire) entitlement

sides with her parents over him and Them… while engaged, in lovey dopamine phase?

frequent escapist fantasies…. during key pair bonding and prime attachment time

Get the body language youtuber to study this video, seriously.

A woman with empathy says

How did she say all those stuff in front of his face like that….

She doesn’t respect him. He’s a middle-aged guy trying to marry a lingerie model. Age gap women never really respect the old coot. Open contempt. He’s mentally messed-up as she is and he’s fair game since he’s a perv, she knows he deserves it (sociopath logic). He’s leaving the mother of his children, why would she respect him?

WHY do you think Cinderella Effect is a STUDIED phenomena?

Women don’t want another woman’s kids, they’re considered like bastards. They want their own to come first. A woman interested in Stepmother is probably dangerous.

No prizes for guessing how many kids they have together now. [zero]

comment

how blind is this guy its clearly a thot

Jewish thot. They age… poorly. Even with the surgical interventions.

Her eyes are practically shrinking into her skull like Sid from Ice Age but men look at T/A so …. okay. She’s aged like Natalie Portman but two decades early. Now she leaks gossip about the singer to websites to force them to break up so he’ll marry her again. Common MO with this type. Gossip manufacture and leakage. The call is coming from inside the house!

comment

That’s what happens when you date someone purely on looks who has a shit personality. Ask yourself if you weren’t rich would she still be with you, if the answer is no then it’s time to move on.

Looks or the fact she’s a model version of your ex to parade around as an upgrade and you asked her to dye her hair to match? Saving face to the ex cost him to lose it eventually.

Nobody in London rated her as a model. Or an actress, for that matter. Cunty personality and no talent. With all his influence she got a smirk role in a Thor film. It was hilarious. She’s like a Hollywood 4. Everyone who knew her from her many schools (she wanted to move) was pissing themselves.

Learn the type, men. Study it like a samurai. Jumped-up public schoolgirl.

1:22 for the OOPS face, look in HD.

Reaches out to touch his arm, sexual distraction. Make him believe her lie more as she arse-covers. Feminine wiles are fine but get a bad rap when used deceitfully. You’re meant to use them in cooperation as a married couple. He is angry and shouts at the kids and you talk him down, that stuff.

For when the vid is taken down, educational purposes, SLOW-MO.

Okay or just that clip, it’s like a car crash anyway. It seems slow-mo.

A vital part of protecting marriage is cutting off the gold diggers.

The manosphere seems to have missed this part, assuming gold diggers stick around. No. You can’t “alpha frame” them into tolerating you.

Listen to Graham’s Pollyanna optimism and never sound like that.

Candy comments

Living with the parents but telling your wife dont interact with them? Stevie Wonder could see that divorce coming.

comment

why tf were they still living with controlling parents?! youre married, get a house. im positive she left cause he didnt want to move out of his parents place

comment

This is disgusting. We don’t know her side. And this guy seems like a true narcissist. I’ve seen his other video. The “millionaire” buys his wife a $20 gift and takes her to the same restaurant when she was not happy. The guy desreves a wakeup fist.

I think they’re both narcissists.

Jap comments

Japanese (both male and female) tend to avoid confrontation at all costs, while build up anger and resentment and having a difficulty of expressing their thought logically. For her, going back to Japan with a son to raise with her parents and in familiar environment seems no brainer. It is selfish decision though, by doing so gradually influence the son to be and think more like her. In Japan, it is very common that “ex-husband is ex-father”, hardly keep any contact with his kids, either by him or her or mutual. It’s unhealthy for the child but neither sides willing or capable to have a conversation to raise their kids together as an adult, in my opinion.

That’s Asian in general.

He didn’t say about missing the kid, there’s something mentally wrong with him.

Guy says to someone

I changed when I went from being unemployed, to getting a job — we stopped traveling so much. My ex changed when we had a child. In Japanese culture, the woman stops being a wife and becomes a selfless mother at that point. (That’s my perception at least) and its’ believed there is honor in that. I tend to think a good mother should demonstrate love to her husband to teach family values.

It’s believed? That’s the culture you married.

He doesn’t tend to think at all. Wow.

I never forced her to live there, she agreed to. Her belief that with money we could move out immediately caused issues, because we were trying to buy a house and that takes time to close. We started bidding on any random house haphazardly (even burned down houses that would cost a ton to rebuild) because we were becoming desperate. And housing in the Bay Area is so competitive we lost all of our bids.

comment

Clearly he paid more attention to he’s job/YouTube than his wife… obvious result

He could be a psychopath. It’s possible. Still, there was deception in there somewhere although…. why sign? Did she have proof of abuse? She isn’t monetizing it.

If you won’t put the spouse above your vanity and career then don’t get married. Goes for men too. No “boys”, the loyalty is to family first or it will break down, eventually. Boys leave, your wife and kids are by your death bed.

Then again, Asia has a ton of hypergamy at the moment. In the West it ended in the 20th century, when studied.

They say when the earner loses money, divorce occurs. Cashing out.

Hypergamy and materialism of both sexes is reducing birth rates.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition

This is normal if r-types are shifting from r.

Between 1750 and 1975 England experienced the transition from high levels of both mortality and fertility, to low levels. A major factor was the sharp decline in the death rate due to infectious diseases, which has fallen from about 11 per 1,000 to less than 1 per 1,000. By contrast, the death rate from other causes was 12 per 1,000 in 1850 and has not declined markedly. The agricultural revolution and the development of transport, initiated by the construction of canals, led to greater availability of food and coal, and enabled the Industrial Revolution to improve the standard of living. Scientific discoveries and medical breakthroughs did not, in general, contribute importantly to the early major decline in infectious disease mortality.”

Atheists lie about that too.

But I’m sure STDs are a hidden factor in Asian infertility, also.

wikipedia generally: “In some countries the population is declining, especially in Eastern Europe, mainly due to low fertility rates, high death rates and emigration.”

Maybe selling their nubile women to cartels as blonde rape victims or sending them to work in brothels doesn’t help.

” Some Western Europe countries might also experience population decline.[22]

So we’re fine, contextually, Eastern Europe is screwed. They rely on large families for various cultural reasons. It keep their economy afloat.

e.g.

http://www.msp.gov.pl/en/polish-economy/economic-news/6146,Poland-facing-risk-of-labor-force-deficit-in-2015.html

They’re not family-oriented AT ALL.

Poland – a country with a fertility rate lower than China

“Poland has a very low fertility rate, lower than the majority of European countries. There is a clear cultural difference – not so much in the level of wealth, but in the quality of life.”

Yeah gotta pay that Sky TV bill on UK welfare sent abroad (really).

“In most of the other countries of Central and Eastern Europe which once belonged to this group, the fertility rate was lower than in the countries of Western and Southern Europe in this group”

“In addition, 22 per cent simply do not want to have a child.”

Actual Polish women, not propaganda you see on Youtube.

“According to the Social Diagnosis for 2015, some 2 million people could have a child, but are prevented from that, mainly by material conditions and the lack of support in childcare. For the most affluent people, the real issue lies not in genuine financial scarcity, but in aspirations and the desire to ensure a sufficiently high standard of living for the children.”

Without the national IQ to produce value and real wealth, so welfare. Gibs.

https://data.oecd.org/pop/young-population.htm#indicator-chart

Oh yeah, their economy’s gonna be great.

Non-white births down in America

The sky isn’t falling you fecking idjits.

https://ifstudies.org/blog/baby-bust-fertility-is-declining-the-most-among-minority-women

[Marriage is also a factor. Unmarried women don’t want a baby.
https://ifstudies.org/blog/no-ring-no-baby ]

I am shook. Women don’t wanna be lumbered with the baby of a man who doesn’t care enough to be a husband and father?* They aren’t attracted to feckless manchilds?

Those bitches!

“That’s because the decline in fertility has been far greater among minorities than among non-Hispanic whites”

FEATURE

NOT. A. BUG.

Chart for the lazy people:

Look at the actual data before whining.

That’s called a selection pressure, children.

Men won’t marry? Women won’t breed.

Who wins? [women, their relatives breed]

But the “white” fertility figure is a bit misleading, as it includes most Hispanics, who have historically had much higher birth rates than non-Hispanic whites. Looking at all Hispanics together, these women are missing nearly 19% of the babies that would have been born from 2008-2016, or about 2.2 million births, as their age-adjusted fertility rates have fallen from 2.85 births per woman to just 2.1, and continue to decline. Meanwhile, non-Hispanic fertility has only declined from 1.95 births per woman to 1.72, yielding about 2.3 million missing births. Solidly half of the missing kids over the last decade would have been born to Hispanic mothers, despite the fact that Hispanics only make up about a quarter of fertility-age women.

Thus, in racial or ethnic terms, America’s “Baby Bust” is kinda, sorta, a little bit racist”

Telling them to be breeding sows isn’t?

Hey, what exactly are they claiming these women should do?

Get back in the maternity ward? Pump out future Dem voters?

*If you really “care” (virtue signal) about Western birth rates, Chicken Littles of the internet, ask MGTOW why they’re complaining about the birth rate but not marrying. You don’t get to complain if you’re causing the ‘problem’.

https://www.rt.com/usa/us-white-births-census-613/

https://nypost.com/2017/09/02/cheap-sex-is-making-men-give-up-on-marriage/

A problem you cause is a CHOICE.

[GDP will go up in a generation with fewer lower IQ drains on its system.]

Other data article:

For the lazy:

“That is, most long-run change in fertility can be accounted for by changes in the marital composition of society.”

Marital status is a key determinant of whether or not women have as many kids as they want.”

HALF OR MORE.

Meanwhile, student loans must be written off if you care about IQ.

“It’s possible that debt may also reduce fertility, independently of marriage. Some studies do show that student debt has a strong effect on delaying fertility. The economic rationale is simple: having and raising children costs money, and student debt gobbles up a share of income right off the top of the budget. Crucially, even income-based repayment doesn’t fix this, as it resets with higher incomes: a debtor can’t earn their way out. As income rises, so do debt payments. At some high threshold, of course, the debtor can exceed the required payments and can advance the date of final repayment, but the point is that student loans, no matter how they are structured, divert money that might have gone towards planning for a child. It’s even possible that student loans delay marriage because they cause debtors to change their childbearing anticipations: maybe debtors realize they won’t be able to afford a child for a long time, and so they postpone marriage until they are (financially) ready for a child.”

Men can’t afford to marry, have kids unless loans are much lower.

Loan control would be a conservative policy, boosting high IQ fertility.

More babies being born are born to high IQ, educated parents.

Again, actual data.

“Finances, and student debt, specifically, aren’t the only reason for delayed marriage. Most unmarried people who want to get married say either that they are too young and unready for marriage, or else they haven’t found the right person. It may be that part of the problem is the decline in “marriageable men.” At the metro area level, the imbalance in sex ratios can sometimes be enormous.”

“The simple fact of the matter is that marital status is a key determinant of whether or not women have as many kids as they want.”

ACTUAL. DATA.

Women want to have kids, it’s the mens’ fault.

“Combined, it turns out that a combination of marital status, age, and fertility ideals is a pretty good predictor of individual-level fertility. In other words, marital status serves as a circuit-breaker on fertility aims: married people get close to achieving their aims, while never-married people generally don’t.”
“But one vital driver of birth rates is marriage. And as long as the average age of first marriage rises and the number of prime childbearing years the average woman spends married falls, we can expect to see fertility linger at low levels. Therefore, any policy supporting childbirth—however generous it may be—that does not also somehow impact marriage trends is unlikely to boost long-term fertility.”

It isn’t women’s fault they won’t man up.

The data is loud and clear.

White bachelor men are cucking themselves.

Inter-racial fertility

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00521.x

“Alternatively, opposition to the relationship from the couple’s family and friends may reduce fertility.”
Nice excuse, shame fertility is biological.

“Interracial and interethnic partnering do not affect fertility for cohabiting, Black‐White, Mexican‐White, and Puerto Rican‐White intermarried couples, but it does reduce fertility in Chinese‐White and Asian Indian‐White intermarriages.”

So much for your Eurasian master race, eh?

Does their atheism have anything to do with this?

Or should that be….

Take comfort in the fact there will be more half-black kids for your half-Asian kids to date!

Hybrid vigour, right goys?

Israel digs its own grave

https://anepigone.blogspot.com/2018/05/hear-o-israel.html

You import people who hate you, you’re gonna have a bad time.

Guards lose to Mob. Ask the French King.

https://anepigone.blogspot.com/2018/05/jewjitsu.html

yes!

The highest IQ of a century ago didn’t breed! How many kids did Einstein have? Three, married twice. To my knowledge, his line is gone now or very dilute. Kids of divorce don’t breed much either.

https://anepigone.blogspot.com/2018/05/oy-vey-edge-slips-away.html

Edison, white, had many children. Two wives, no divorce. Six kids. His line is pretty much long gone too. Only one of those had kids. One out of six!

You could be full r and have a thousand kids. If they don’t reproduce past one or two generations, it’s over.

Ew, r-types

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/05/26/quiet-revolution-ireland-votes-repeal-tough-abortion-laws/

Look how happy they are in all the photos.

Liberal birth rates: a feature, not a bug.

I’ve seen more muted reactions to winning the lottery.

They aren’t quietly respectful and pleased to have medical options, they are openly celebrating the intentional creation of life only to snuff it out like an Ikea candle.

TBF

I am totally in favour of abortion as long as it’s left-wingers doing it. Thankfully, it is.
[Considering partisanship is heavily genetic.]

Otherwise, they give the kid to the State and we end up raising it or they poison it and if it isn’t miscarried, it’s born defective.

What happened to keeping the Government out of their bedroom?

Why are Christian taxes expected to fund this?

I guess it’s karmic. Their parents should’ve aborted them it’s just one generation delayed. Fewer shitty parents in the world but holy fuck will they howl when they discover they’re infertile in a few years with a clock ticking louder than the crocodile in Peter Pan.

We’ll be expected to pay for IVF too.

Little known fact: the fail rate is directly connected to poor genetic quality.

Better looking IVF couples (and same race) have more success. Look!

Technically, this is a supremely eugenic result. More realistic selection pressure.
And people too thick to use condoms should really be weeded out of the gene pool.

Where are you, baby Jesus? Did they sell you for body parts too?

Plus, their cancer rate is higher, the pluripotent cells are heavy carcinogenic risks. Stem cells aren’t always a good thing.

They don’t list it here but the Pill is (women shouldn’t be on it).
https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/breast/basic_info/risk_factors.htm
Buried here:
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/medical-treatments/abortion-and-breast-cancer-risk.html
It starts “But scientific research studies have not found a cause-and-effect relationship between abortion and breast cancer.”
For legal reasons, lower down, past where most people read:
“Some case-control studies, however, have found an increase in risk.”
So they lie.

Case control is more scientific. You can’t claim no link when there are links. Mixed evidence is still evidence. Notice they can’t claim it reduces the risk? The lawyers won’t let them.

When there are no children to pay their pension, we can laugh.

On the bright side, they have no respect for life, so if Greece gets its act together and starts shooting down boats they can’t cry about Teh Children.

Why Big Pensions kill societies

http://anepigone.blogspot.co.uk/2005/10/numbers-game-is-life-or-death.html

Of all the welfare, it’s the biggest and most undeserved chunk.

Unlike a child, they could work.

Unlike a child, they could have saved.

Unlike a child, they demand non-relatives with no control over their existence to slave for them.

It is impossible to continue a society with any prosperity while the old votes themselves in the lifeblood of the young. There should be a sane limit on all pensions so we can’t fund them out of debt, at least. We talk about genocide and this is a genocidal condition – its effect literally suppresses the birth rate.

Gen Y cannot afford to have children, look around.

Gen Y cannot afford to get married either, which ought to come first.

Gen Y can barely even afford to move out. These are facts.

There has been too much inter-generational theft – sorry – wealth transfer. It’s ageist. They don’t deserve all kinds of free shit because they survived a certain number of solar cycles.

The elderly now are the most spoiled in history. It shows.

No generation before had the luxuries they do. Still, they want more.

Nobody after will enjoy the same either. A huge shift of redpilling in the young as they figure this out.

Softly, softly.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/07/generation-y-pay-price-baby-boomer-pensions

It killed Rome, it’s killing us. I think it’s absurd to expect someone else’s children should fund your dotage. It’s the most negative manifestation of nationalism. I am your neighbour, I owe you fuck-all because of that coincidence. An Englishman’s home is his castle, and we hate intruders (including relatives).

I will find it particularly sweet when the public sector workers don’t get paid by Daddy Government. Let the police blame the teachers, the teachers blame the unions, the unions blame the police. Let them at one another, all screaming LEECH. Let’s see how much they love their socialist whip hands then.

https://www.theguardian.com/membership/2017/jan/23/saving-retirement-pension-generation-old-age

https://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/london-life/is-this-why-millennials-arent-having-babies-a3288601.html

Quick question: Do you currently have over $245,000 (£180,000) in your bank account? That’s how much the U.S. Department of Agriculture projected it would cost a middle-income couple to raise a child to the age of 18 in 2013. For higher-income families, that cost ballooned to $455,000 (£330,000).

Might be?

And that’s ONE child. We aren’t even talking replacement.

I heard a very shrewd man say “marriage is for the rich” and he’s spot on.

Who made it so expensive to have kids?

The Boomers. Pressure on all things wedding, baby and schooling.
Oh, but the fertile nulliparous workers are being taxed to pay for other children’s food/shelter and schooling. We’re literally rewarding the stupid fuckers. Forcing us to barely get by and never save, as a generation. So you can’t borrow the money (it’ll go up) and you’re being leeched off and you can’t save.

Not to mention, if men choose to never propose, baby machine isn’t getting switched on. Ever. K-women need that security. The anti-natal propaganda has worked just fine on many of the dunces among men, who are literally committing genetic suicide but tell themselves it’s a good thing. They might as well self-castrate. Gods like Zeus weren’t revered for fucking around, if you actually read they were revered for their fertility – making lots of heirs.

When the Baby Boomers complain “their” pensions disappeared, we can all point and laugh. “Yep, that’s what you get when you genocide your own children.” We know many of the immigrant children are not being supported by working parents. So they will never support the pension system either.

It’s already happening. We in the West have done all the worst things possible – abortion, easy divorce, adultery, fornication with abortifacients (still counts) and medicine exclusively to keep the old and infirm a burden on the workers.

Now there’s a baby bust, apparently. Three generations in the making. Thanks, Sexual Revolution!

https://www.populationmatters.org/fewer-uk-births-deaths-2016/

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-22/millennials-have-ushered-baby-bust-cycle

It just so happens to coincide with handing out birth control like Smarties.

Do the people pretending to care about population replacement want to restrict birth control, the way it was originally intended? To just married parents who didn’t want more? Nope, and those degenerate single people are part of the problem. Their ride on the gravy train will be over pretty soon too. Almost everything we fund presently is temporary, inc. STD and abortion clinics. So these things will correct in the coming years but it won’t be pretty. I’m just saying we take the bitter pill now (including my lot, that did nothing wrong but be born) instead of the fatal one later. That would be logical… so everyone fights me on this.

Selling our country (literally, the land) has priced out the fertile natives.

https://www.citylab.com/life/2018/02/a-fix-to-the-uk-housing-crunch-have-more-money/553574/

Yay, more genocide.

It’s impossible to push against more than one of these trends. They’re bigger than people.

Where are the kids meant to live? School catchment areas? I read about those recently for a friend and they’re a huge factor in pricing (basically the more white an area, the better the hospitals, schools etc, low crime). A premium for the rarity of living among one’s own. It never used to be expensive because it never used to be a rarity.

The fact you can get welfare to live in London, paid for by people who can’t afford to, floors me.

https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/millennials-travelling-houses-cant-afford-property-prices-industry-experts-contiki-u-by-uniworld-g-a8090891.html

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/rendezview/ten-reasons-your-kid-cant-buy-a-house-and-why-youre-to-blame/news-story/725ee80a0d88754e299198e774ec95d5

The parents/grandparents would rather live in undeserved luxury than provide for the spawn they didn’t abort.

This world makes me sick.

These forces cannot continue much longer. It’s impossible to do the right thing.

The worst pressure amounting to white genocide comes from older white people. This is how Empires fall.

In a world where you can’t even sit down for an ice cream to calm down, even Ben & Jerry’s ice cream contains pesticides that reduce your fertility and the drinking water includes birth control. That is disgusting. Ban it on environmental grounds alone.

Birth rates

Credit: Master Brew

You’re gonna have to get the marriage rate up for that.

Until you do that, now is not the time!

Besides, European births mean nothing in light of Australian-Pacific, South American and especially African birth rates. If they stopped right now, it would still take about a century to stabilize. I mentioned this on posts about African demographics. No use having three kids apiece if they all still end up outnumbered.

This is without the questions of immigration to homelands, replacement and deportation.
Those come first. You plug the leak before you bail water out the boat.
Not that whites can currently afford to breed with the crushing expenses of the welfare state, rising national debt and foreign aid, and the low wages caused by nearly all the good jobs moving to Asia because your politicians are cucks.

We have a lot of work to do before you point and say, Y NO BABIES?

They’re being responsible?

None of the men ever saying this want to be a father. As in, spend around half the parenting time with the sprogs. They believe it’s lame because TV told them.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/07/16/white-nationalisms-creepy-fertility-cult/

Father is a job. It takes up a lot of time. We’re not going for the Ghetto Method here.

What won’t the establishment discuss? Drill down on that.