Non-white births down in America

The sky isn’t falling you fecking idjits.

https://ifstudies.org/blog/baby-bust-fertility-is-declining-the-most-among-minority-women

[Marriage is also a factor. Unmarried women don’t want a baby.
https://ifstudies.org/blog/no-ring-no-baby ]

I am shook. Women don’t wanna be lumbered with the baby of a man who doesn’t care enough to be a husband and father?* They aren’t attracted to feckless manchilds?

Those bitches!

“That’s because the decline in fertility has been far greater among minorities than among non-Hispanic whites”

FEATURE

NOT. A. BUG.

Chart for the lazy people:

Look at the actual data before whining.

That’s called a selection pressure, children.

Men won’t marry? Women won’t breed.

Who wins? [women, their relatives breed]

But the “white” fertility figure is a bit misleading, as it includes most Hispanics, who have historically had much higher birth rates than non-Hispanic whites. Looking at all Hispanics together, these women are missing nearly 19% of the babies that would have been born from 2008-2016, or about 2.2 million births, as their age-adjusted fertility rates have fallen from 2.85 births per woman to just 2.1, and continue to decline. Meanwhile, non-Hispanic fertility has only declined from 1.95 births per woman to 1.72, yielding about 2.3 million missing births. Solidly half of the missing kids over the last decade would have been born to Hispanic mothers, despite the fact that Hispanics only make up about a quarter of fertility-age women.

Thus, in racial or ethnic terms, America’s “Baby Bust” is kinda, sorta, a little bit racist”

Telling them to be breeding sows isn’t?

Hey, what exactly are they claiming these women should do?

Get back in the maternity ward? Pump out future Dem voters?

*If you really “care” (virtue signal) about Western birth rates, Chicken Littles of the internet, ask MGTOW why they’re complaining about the birth rate but not marrying. You don’t get to complain if you’re causing the ‘problem’.

https://www.rt.com/usa/us-white-births-census-613/

https://nypost.com/2017/09/02/cheap-sex-is-making-men-give-up-on-marriage/

A problem you cause is a CHOICE.

[GDP will go up in a generation with fewer lower IQ drains on its system.]

Other data article:

For the lazy:

“That is, most long-run change in fertility can be accounted for by changes in the marital composition of society.”

Marital status is a key determinant of whether or not women have as many kids as they want.”

HALF OR MORE.

Meanwhile, student loans must be written off if you care about IQ.

“It’s possible that debt may also reduce fertility, independently of marriage. Some studies do show that student debt has a strong effect on delaying fertility. The economic rationale is simple: having and raising children costs money, and student debt gobbles up a share of income right off the top of the budget. Crucially, even income-based repayment doesn’t fix this, as it resets with higher incomes: a debtor can’t earn their way out. As income rises, so do debt payments. At some high threshold, of course, the debtor can exceed the required payments and can advance the date of final repayment, but the point is that student loans, no matter how they are structured, divert money that might have gone towards planning for a child. It’s even possible that student loans delay marriage because they cause debtors to change their childbearing anticipations: maybe debtors realize they won’t be able to afford a child for a long time, and so they postpone marriage until they are (financially) ready for a child.”

Men can’t afford to marry, have kids unless loans are much lower.

Loan control would be a conservative policy, boosting high IQ fertility.

More babies being born are born to high IQ, educated parents.

Again, actual data.

“Finances, and student debt, specifically, aren’t the only reason for delayed marriage. Most unmarried people who want to get married say either that they are too young and unready for marriage, or else they haven’t found the right person. It may be that part of the problem is the decline in “marriageable men.” At the metro area level, the imbalance in sex ratios can sometimes be enormous.”

“The simple fact of the matter is that marital status is a key determinant of whether or not women have as many kids as they want.”

ACTUAL. DATA.

Women want to have kids, it’s the mens’ fault.

“Combined, it turns out that a combination of marital status, age, and fertility ideals is a pretty good predictor of individual-level fertility. In other words, marital status serves as a circuit-breaker on fertility aims: married people get close to achieving their aims, while never-married people generally don’t.”
“But one vital driver of birth rates is marriage. And as long as the average age of first marriage rises and the number of prime childbearing years the average woman spends married falls, we can expect to see fertility linger at low levels. Therefore, any policy supporting childbirth—however generous it may be—that does not also somehow impact marriage trends is unlikely to boost long-term fertility.”

It isn’t women’s fault they won’t man up.

The data is loud and clear.

White bachelor men are cucking themselves.

Inter-racial fertility

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00521.x

“Alternatively, opposition to the relationship from the couple’s family and friends may reduce fertility.”
Nice excuse, shame fertility is biological.

“Interracial and interethnic partnering do not affect fertility for cohabiting, Black‐White, Mexican‐White, and Puerto Rican‐White intermarried couples, but it does reduce fertility in Chinese‐White and Asian Indian‐White intermarriages.”

So much for your Eurasian master race, eh?

Does their atheism have anything to do with this?

Or should that be….

Take comfort in the fact there will be more half-black kids for your half-Asian kids to date!

Hybrid vigour, right goys?

Israel digs its own grave

https://anepigone.blogspot.com/2018/05/hear-o-israel.html

You import people who hate you, you’re gonna have a bad time.

Guards lose to Mob. Ask the French King.

https://anepigone.blogspot.com/2018/05/jewjitsu.html

yes!

The highest IQ of a century ago didn’t breed! How many kids did Einstein have? Three, married twice. To my knowledge, his line is gone now or very dilute. Kids of divorce don’t breed much either.

https://anepigone.blogspot.com/2018/05/oy-vey-edge-slips-away.html

Edison, white, had many children. Two wives, no divorce. Six kids. His line is pretty much long gone too. Only one of those had kids. One out of six!

You could be full r and have a thousand kids. If they don’t reproduce past one or two generations, it’s over.

Ew, r-types

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/05/26/quiet-revolution-ireland-votes-repeal-tough-abortion-laws/

Look how happy they are in all the photos.

Liberal birth rates: a feature, not a bug.

I’ve seen more muted reactions to winning the lottery.

They aren’t quietly respectful and pleased to have medical options, they are openly celebrating the intentional creation of life only to snuff it out like an Ikea candle.

TBF

I am totally in favour of abortion as long as it’s left-wingers doing it. Thankfully, it is.
[Considering partisanship is heavily genetic.]

Otherwise, they give the kid to the State and we end up raising it or they poison it and if it isn’t miscarried, it’s born defective.

What happened to keeping the Government out of their bedroom?

Why are Christian taxes expected to fund this?

I guess it’s karmic. Their parents should’ve aborted them it’s just one generation delayed. Fewer shitty parents in the world but holy fuck will they howl when they discover they’re infertile in a few years with a clock ticking louder than the crocodile in Peter Pan.

We’ll be expected to pay for IVF too.

Little known fact: the fail rate is directly connected to poor genetic quality.

Better looking IVF couples (and same race) have more success. Look!

Technically, this is a supremely eugenic result. More realistic selection pressure.
And people too thick to use condoms should really be weeded out of the gene pool.

Where are you, baby Jesus? Did they sell you for body parts too?

Plus, their cancer rate is higher, the pluripotent cells are heavy carcinogenic risks. Stem cells aren’t always a good thing.

They don’t list it here but the Pill is (women shouldn’t be on it).
https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/breast/basic_info/risk_factors.htm
Buried here:
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/medical-treatments/abortion-and-breast-cancer-risk.html
It starts “But scientific research studies have not found a cause-and-effect relationship between abortion and breast cancer.”
For legal reasons, lower down, past where most people read:
“Some case-control studies, however, have found an increase in risk.”
So they lie.

Case control is more scientific. You can’t claim no link when there are links. Mixed evidence is still evidence. Notice they can’t claim it reduces the risk? The lawyers won’t let them.

When there are no children to pay their pension, we can laugh.

On the bright side, they have no respect for life, so if Greece gets its act together and starts shooting down boats they can’t cry about Teh Children.

Why Big Pensions kill societies

http://anepigone.blogspot.co.uk/2005/10/numbers-game-is-life-or-death.html

Of all the welfare, it’s the biggest and most undeserved chunk.

Unlike a child, they could work.

Unlike a child, they could have saved.

Unlike a child, they demand non-relatives with no control over their existence to slave for them.

It is impossible to continue a society with any prosperity while the old votes themselves in the lifeblood of the young. There should be a sane limit on all pensions so we can’t fund them out of debt, at least. We talk about genocide and this is a genocidal condition – its effect literally suppresses the birth rate.

Gen Y cannot afford to have children, look around.

Gen Y cannot afford to get married either, which ought to come first.

Gen Y can barely even afford to move out. These are facts.

There has been too much inter-generational theft – sorry – wealth transfer. It’s ageist. They don’t deserve all kinds of free shit because they survived a certain number of solar cycles.

The elderly now are the most spoiled in history. It shows.

No generation before had the luxuries they do. Still, they want more.

Nobody after will enjoy the same either. A huge shift of redpilling in the young as they figure this out.

Softly, softly.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/07/generation-y-pay-price-baby-boomer-pensions

It killed Rome, it’s killing us. I think it’s absurd to expect someone else’s children should fund your dotage. It’s the most negative manifestation of nationalism. I am your neighbour, I owe you fuck-all because of that coincidence. An Englishman’s home is his castle, and we hate intruders (including relatives).

I will find it particularly sweet when the public sector workers don’t get paid by Daddy Government. Let the police blame the teachers, the teachers blame the unions, the unions blame the police. Let them at one another, all screaming LEECH. Let’s see how much they love their socialist whip hands then.

https://www.theguardian.com/membership/2017/jan/23/saving-retirement-pension-generation-old-age

https://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/london-life/is-this-why-millennials-arent-having-babies-a3288601.html

Quick question: Do you currently have over $245,000 (£180,000) in your bank account? That’s how much the U.S. Department of Agriculture projected it would cost a middle-income couple to raise a child to the age of 18 in 2013. For higher-income families, that cost ballooned to $455,000 (£330,000).

Might be?

And that’s ONE child. We aren’t even talking replacement.

I heard a very shrewd man say “marriage is for the rich” and he’s spot on.

Who made it so expensive to have kids?

The Boomers. Pressure on all things wedding, baby and schooling.
Oh, but the fertile nulliparous workers are being taxed to pay for other children’s food/shelter and schooling. We’re literally rewarding the stupid fuckers. Forcing us to barely get by and never save, as a generation. So you can’t borrow the money (it’ll go up) and you’re being leeched off and you can’t save.

Not to mention, if men choose to never propose, baby machine isn’t getting switched on. Ever. K-women need that security. The anti-natal propaganda has worked just fine on many of the dunces among men, who are literally committing genetic suicide but tell themselves it’s a good thing. They might as well self-castrate. Gods like Zeus weren’t revered for fucking around, if you actually read they were revered for their fertility – making lots of heirs.

When the Baby Boomers complain “their” pensions disappeared, we can all point and laugh. “Yep, that’s what you get when you genocide your own children.” We know many of the immigrant children are not being supported by working parents. So they will never support the pension system either.

It’s already happening. We in the West have done all the worst things possible – abortion, easy divorce, adultery, fornication with abortifacients (still counts) and medicine exclusively to keep the old and infirm a burden on the workers.

Now there’s a baby bust, apparently. Three generations in the making. Thanks, Sexual Revolution!

https://www.populationmatters.org/fewer-uk-births-deaths-2016/

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-22/millennials-have-ushered-baby-bust-cycle

It just so happens to coincide with handing out birth control like Smarties.

Do the people pretending to care about population replacement want to restrict birth control, the way it was originally intended? To just married parents who didn’t want more? Nope, and those degenerate single people are part of the problem. Their ride on the gravy train will be over pretty soon too. Almost everything we fund presently is temporary, inc. STD and abortion clinics. So these things will correct in the coming years but it won’t be pretty. I’m just saying we take the bitter pill now (including my lot, that did nothing wrong but be born) instead of the fatal one later. That would be logical… so everyone fights me on this.

Selling our country (literally, the land) has priced out the fertile natives.

https://www.citylab.com/life/2018/02/a-fix-to-the-uk-housing-crunch-have-more-money/553574/

Yay, more genocide.

It’s impossible to push against more than one of these trends. They’re bigger than people.

Where are the kids meant to live? School catchment areas? I read about those recently for a friend and they’re a huge factor in pricing (basically the more white an area, the better the hospitals, schools etc, low crime). A premium for the rarity of living among one’s own. It never used to be expensive because it never used to be a rarity.

The fact you can get welfare to live in London, paid for by people who can’t afford to, floors me.

https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/millennials-travelling-houses-cant-afford-property-prices-industry-experts-contiki-u-by-uniworld-g-a8090891.html

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/rendezview/ten-reasons-your-kid-cant-buy-a-house-and-why-youre-to-blame/news-story/725ee80a0d88754e299198e774ec95d5

The parents/grandparents would rather live in undeserved luxury than provide for the spawn they didn’t abort.

This world makes me sick.

These forces cannot continue much longer. It’s impossible to do the right thing.

The worst pressure amounting to white genocide comes from older white people. This is how Empires fall.

In a world where you can’t even sit down for an ice cream to calm down, even Ben & Jerry’s ice cream contains pesticides that reduce your fertility and the drinking water includes birth control. That is disgusting. Ban it on environmental grounds alone.

Birth rates

Credit: Master Brew

You’re gonna have to get the marriage rate up for that.

Until you do that, now is not the time!

Besides, European births mean nothing in light of Australian-Pacific, South American and especially African birth rates. If they stopped right now, it would still take about a century to stabilize. I mentioned this on posts about African demographics. No use having three kids apiece if they all still end up outnumbered.

This is without the questions of immigration to homelands, replacement and deportation.
Those come first. You plug the leak before you bail water out the boat.
Not that whites can currently afford to breed with the crushing expenses of the welfare state, rising national debt and foreign aid, and the low wages caused by nearly all the good jobs moving to Asia because your politicians are cucks.

We have a lot of work to do before you point and say, Y NO BABIES?

They’re being responsible?

None of the men ever saying this want to be a father. As in, spend around half the parenting time with the sprogs. They believe it’s lame because TV told them.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/07/16/white-nationalisms-creepy-fertility-cult/

Father is a job. It takes up a lot of time. We’re not going for the Ghetto Method here.

What won’t the establishment discuss? Drill down on that.

Low birth rate caused by birth control, explained

If we’re talking evolution and society, we need to review everything in light of r/K.

Slut shaming was prosocial. Bring back bachelor tax (we already have it in welfare parent tax for non-parents).
http://shylockholmes.blogspot.co.uk/2017/01/the-birth-control-basilisk.html

More sex than ever, fewer babies. Doesn’t take a genius to work out.

It tends to cull r-types, birth control was designed for married K-types to curb in line with their natural instincts and environmental needs.
“3. People have a very strong, uncomplicated desire to love and care for the children they have.”
K-types only.
It’s impossible to discuss sex without sexual strategy.

And yet people do.

” A strong desire to have sex ensures children are produced with fairly high regularity, because birth control is either non-existent or unreliable. ”
R-types only.
Ks limit their sexuality for monogamy, once pair-bonding has been achieved with a suitable mate. In human terms, after marriage.
Most of the sub-replacement fertility in Europe is due to the low marriage rates. It’s good that people aren’t reproducing out of wedlock.

“The whole idea of it being a contentious question whether you chose to have kids or not is, as far as I can tell, a shockingly recent question. If the only way you could so choose would be to either a) not get laid, or b) rely on methods that require practice, discipline in the heat of coital moment, forward planning and/or health risks, the discussion would be largely moot.”

Still no mention of marriage as related to procreation.
This, from a traditionalist.
People are that decoupled. Thanks, sexual revolution!
Birth control is K-selected, the problem is that it didn’t account for the Revolution that messed with marriage.
If everyone having sex is married, it becomes a matter of family planning.
If anything with marriage goes awry, the r-types win out because the Ks aren’t even hopping the first hurdle of the big white wedding day. Plus they’re limiting.
The man who invented The Pill intended for it to help spouses who wanted to enjoy sex but not bankrupt their pre-existing families. We could also limit birth control to those who’ve already bred like it used to be but that’s too sensible. Chemical BC causes many health problems in women, there’s medical grounds to restrict it.
The Pill as a theory is K-enforcing since it imposes their pattern on the r-types.

Never including IQ as a factor in to who is/should be allowed birth control by the state is also an issue.
Age to a lesser extent. You don’t finish developing until your twenties.