The hustle culture stuff is Plato’s natural slaves combined with Calhoun’s Beautiful Ones. They have no family to pass anything they build onto, but they’re slaving away for The Man (the banks) and they’re proud of their slavish obedience. At least our favourite Jew has the common sense to be a minimalist. Why TF slave away for some other cunt’s family? No country for inheritance cucks.
Meanwhile, Grandpa Kermit is booming away, as if the losses in marriages/births aren’t compounding with every year. Every year a man and woman don’t have children, the children they failed to have ALSO won’t have children, who ALSO won’t have children, of whom ALSO won’t have children.
YOU HAD ONE JOB AS AN ANIMAL. ONE. ONE JOB.
Does he mention this? No. God forbid the room-cleaners clean a mirror. It’s literally algebra. Undeniable.
Looking at birth rates as only women is an ignorant mistake. Takes two. This is biology, not economics. Blaming women for the birth rate (as if out-of-wedlock is desirable!!!) is like the town drunkard blaming the wine vendors for his repeated DUIs. Could ya take some personal responsibility there, champ?
Looking at births year on year is also a mistake. Generations exist in more than one n=1 trial. You cannot make conclusions intergenerationally based on one generation’s sample.
again, sorry for understanding fucking statistics, it’s kind of my thing
On par with the FIRE retards who think they can afford to move to Asia, literally the fastest developing continent on the planet. The Boomer tard 4% model from that one shitty paper never accounted for cost of living. It was ALL INCOME, NO EXPENSES. Models don’t account for expenses, they’re too personal. Hence, draw-down, which is impersonal. AKA unrealistic. As a country ‘develops’ aka sells out to foreigners like the tard expats, WHAT HAPPENS TO THE COST OF LIVING DUDE BROOOOOOOOO?
Someone pay Clarey for a video on that because I know I’m right, dammit. It’s an equation.
I want us to deport all our slutty retards, obviously, my only concern is when they’ll come back, probably with a Ting Tong and anchor babies in tow, still bitching about immigration they caused several times over like a Boomer in Thailand Neo-dodging HIV from little boys. Ban them from returning (nor their spawn, like, ever) and I fully endorse paying anyone that stupid and xenophilic to leave.
If they want Asia to be dude bro Pleasure Island, don’t let the asses back. Call their bluff.
No war is even required if we make a Whore Island.
We should build a real Pleasure Island in the Atlantic with sexbots and unlimited drugs, on condition once you show up, you’re never allowed to leave on pain of being shot as you try to escape. Our r problem would be over in a few years. It’s flawless and economically efficient and they wouldn’t even make any babies. It’s an abortion-free degeneracy model, call it Sodom Island for extra points. Love Island is the prototype for this island of whores. Plot twist: only men can go, so we get a crime rate dropping to almost zero and a reverse problem to the angry incels of India and the remaining godly men could have several Biblical tradwives. WHERE IS THE DOWNSIDE. Get them to sign a contract age 18 and hold them to it.
EVERY NATION COULD DO THIS AND IT’S COMPLETELY ETHICAL AMONG ADULTS.
Every degenerate I’ve asked about this likes the idea. It’s the logical extension of UBI except it works. It works for everyone. Literally everybody would benefit, unlike Communism.
The problem isn’t suffering the degenerate to live. It’s refusing to banish them Bible style. A tree that makes no fruit is burned. It wasn’t talking about trees. Instead of fleeing immorality, isolate it.
Otherwise you get the white flight problem but with degenerates. We cannot live in the same system.
The future is segregation by anti-natalism to pro-natalism. It’s sin prison, sold like a resort. Absolute degenerate anarchy, any fetish goes and the ‘women’ are literally robots so who cares? With the misogynists and psychopaths gone, both politicians and feminism dies. Stop letting them drain us.
They’d literally move to Antarctica like fucking Pingu if the beer were cheap, BRO. The manosphere in the past five years or so has become full of these degenerate normie asshats. They’re total NPCs. These videos send them up P E R F E C T L Y. Nothing they say indicates a capacity for original thought.
The future will consider the Boomer genocidal maniacs for that coompounding* effect, that will continue to apply until humans go extinct. Later generations including my own, who mock the Boomers for this will also be held responsible if they’re rutting without reproducing. If you act like a Boomer, the future will hate you. Will call you evil just the same. Have a nice day and enjoy your dollar beer, BRO. I hope Downing Western Civ was TOTALLY WORTH IT.
Limiting births in a population is genocide, according to the UN. We could make it illegal, men don’t want to. God forbid they get a vasectomy, right? An afternoon’s inconvenience. How awful. Instead, they’ll make plaintive mewling videos blaming women for something they cause in women. Chain of causation, anyone? Lesbians don’t get abortions. Yeah, they forget about this oh-so conveniently because they’re intellectually dishonest. Only when men are involved is there potential for abortion. Logically, that makes it a male issue, not a women’s one. Same as drunk driving is caused by the alcohol as the problem, not the bloody car. Again, chain of fucking causation. Yet they play dumb. As if that isn’t biological fact.
The NHS makes money from dealing death. Make GPs pay money to the government for every abortion and they’d fucking disappear, same as circumcisions used to be on the NHS – until they lost money. Charge them for lost earnings of the murdered worker and the whole fucking thing shuts down forever.
Club foot doesn’t need surgery, it needs physio. A relative had it. No surgery, walks fine. It’s normal with pre-term births. I repeat, normal. The way to spot any Moloch Marxist is to ask if sex is for pleasure or babymaking. Even the fake Ks will trip on that one. Selfish wankers. The cult of Moloch says babymaking is for pleasure and the child is an inconvenience, as if wanking doesn’t exist for that exact scenario. Abortions will go down as shotgun weddings go up, so requiring paternity tests would be a good move. The infanticide demand is from men unwilling to marry and be held accountable for what they made with their own seed. Women don’t have a seed, the Bible is very clear on that one. In any patriarchy, men are held responsible for their own seed. Odd how these guys bleating on the topic don’t want that? It’s a hippy Boomer practice of encouraging STD and abortion clinics then blaming women for using them, by force (abuser) or coercion (saying they won’t support the kid or marry the mother), as if they aren’t 50% responsible for the need of them. 100% if the mother’s decision is based on the conditions set out by the father. Again, conditions. Logic. Totally missing in most conversations on this topic. Women don’t go for it in a vacuum of no options talk, do they? If you paint women into a financial or situational (illegitimate) corner, no blaming them for being there. The Bible holds Onan accountable, NOT his wife. The Bible also says that men getting a woman pregnant should be forced to marry her, which the manosphere doesn’t like…. huh. Whose hypoagency? In surveys, women disapprove of abortion more than men, so the demand is clearly coming from r-selected men, who would howl about ‘trapping’ men and ‘spermjacking’ if infanticide were banned (excepting when consent for babymaking was not given, of course, and criminally reported shortly after). A cap on abortions of one would also be a wise idea, excepting reported rape in good time. You can’t make a ‘mistake’ more than once. Then it isn’t a mistake, is it? It should also be on medical record that your potential spouse needs to see prior to marriage, since despite Left wing claims, abortions can affect future fertility. There’s also health risks like cancer they try to bury. It’s a toxic idea of sex as a hobby or past-time, a form of exercise for men than the serious process of making babies. Porn caused this delusion, and until hardcore porn is banned as the anti-natal dysgenic propaganda it is, culture won’t revert back to the 1950s. In neurology studies, the guys literally have brain damage. I’ve posted before about it. Frontal lobe damage. If a man doesn’t want to marry the mother, he has no business having the sex to make her one. Men have the power to make women mothers, not women. Women are powerless on this front. Women don’t make themselves mothers, the Bible holds men accountable for their seed. Sexual reproduction is not for pleasure, that’s masturbation. This trifling view of sexuality and the Marxist false equivalence serving Moloch is immature and common among the manchild demographic. The term casual sex betrays this masturbation, wanker’s attitude. Those are not real men. Real men have responsibilities. The angle of white genocide comes into play, duh. So it’s eugenic from SJW perspective since they’re self-hating traitors. There’s no mention of non-white abortions even when highly eugenic. I was passing by a school a few months ago and most of the kids were disabled. It was not a disabled school. Why? Well, most of the kids were Asian. Their parents were clearly fucking cousins, which I made a joke about. We could just ban people of that relatedness from reproduction and save the welfare system tons of money but that would make sense so nooooo, we can’t have that. The future corner shop workers would revolt. Meaning it’s dysgenic as an overall trend because the retards of the non-white group outnumber the prevented retards of the white group. Over time, the retard problem is increasing, without going into the teratogen effect of vaccine damage caused by inflammation. Again, I’ve previously posted studies showing it retards kids. Generally, the UK has seriously sub-replacement fertility of men and women (the erasure of men from fertility data is SJW) but this is covered up by including immigrant data, which portrays a false picture. There’s frequent lying about tests where they claim the kid has a genetic problem but they turn out to be fine. I suspect Cabal involvement. Banning those tests would help, since they don’t work. Nobody mentions medical sharia, I’d wager Muslim Drs treating white women have higher abortion rates, but there are no studies debunking it so they must’ve collected the data only to find it’s real. The Pill is the first type of chemical abortion though, it brags about preventing a fertilised egg from attaching or remaining attached – that is an abortion! Plenty of men, even fathers, encourage their own daughters onto that toxic shit. Banning surgeries wouldn’t be enough, you’d need to ban the Pill, which men will never ever do, while also complaining about slut culture. They bluff. This is why Lefties laugh at them and joke about sexual denial keeping them in line, only to panic when men go celibate. Angry panic.
How many dead babies were silently prevented from life by the Pill? Nobody knows. If a man is willingly fucking a woman on the Pill, he is still spiritually responsible for abortion. Like Onan. Every religion says that sex minus reproduction curses the pair involved so frankly, the West deserves to die out if we choose fucking and infanticide over personal responsibility and getting married. Don’t fuck if you can’t ‘handle’ the responsibility of babies. It’s that simple. No excuses. You should’ve thought about that before consenting. The Bible mentions the idea of karma and it will come back to bite everyone. Judge not lest ye be judged? As you sow, you shall reap? The wages of sin is death? Well, genetic death at least is obvious. I wonder if being in any way responsible for an abortion (including fucking on the Pill) would qualify one for Hell, it must do, since Thou shalt not Kill. It’s killing. It’s playing God and preventing life, while doing the very thing to also create it. The manosphere pretends to be spiritual but are too cowardly to discuss such cold prospects, even with a suite of theological evidence at their disposal. Personally, I hope r aborts itself out of existence, the only problem is we’re importing more of it. Natural selection only works in a closed system, we shouldn’t be supplementing with the degenerates of other nations. You’ll notice all the obscure rare medical problems in kids in Great Ormond St. are dramatically diverse, strikingly so. Walk down a single corridor and count the white kids. Play spot the white person. You’d be pressed to find three. Mother Nature is trying to clean up after our messes of socially allowing this to be ‘nice’. Is encouraging a short life of medically preserved suffering really nice? Even Depp’s kid in there is mixed (one black relative and a bizarrely shaped body) so no prizes for guessing if the practice is a good idea. She recently had at least one miscarriage, quelle surprise. When even Catholics are being total whores with the Pill, we kind of probably maybe sort of totally deserve to die out. The Lord’s way is higher and he says the wage is death, so I say, so be it. Many commenting on this topic think they know better than God and get all lachrymose as if life is inherently a good thing. The Bible says the opposite, talking of abominations, offending God. So that entire argument is complete, observable nonsense. Nope, kiddo, bucko, pal. You chose your fate. Don’t commit the crime if you don’t like the sentence. The book has been around for millennia, you were warned. Stop offending God and complaining you wuz punished. You diddu summin. The atheist argument of ‘why does God let bad things happen to good people’? presumes goodness, a positive claim. Leading the witness, really. No human is presumed good, which pisses them off if you say it. Is making a defective child on purpose a good person? No, blatantly not. They deserve to fucking suffer, that is completely just. The Bible even says children suffer for their wicked fathers unto the third generation. Obviously, it’s genetic. Personally, I want the useless fuckers to go extinct. White people had a good run before we let racial shame encourage our own destruction, the racial apathy means we deserved it, I’m sure the other races will enjoy fighting each other over the scraps in a plastic dystopia of Mongoloid Africans. Look at the national IQs of Asian and African nations, they’re ruined without us. They’ll have nobody to copy civilization from anymore. If you don’t preserve a plant, it dies. If you don’t preserve a race, same.
[Inb4, China is not the world’s oldest civilization, they constantly experience population collapse and famines, various implosions from incompetence. That is not a civilization. That is a virus over-consuming the host periodically, r-style. Their genetics change all the time due to rape and invasion. The Chinese have like a dozen different races so swerve me with that propaganda. China is a concept and hence doomed to fail, they also deny God and imprison Christians. Anyone thinking “Communism has never been tried” is anti-civilization. End of story.]
“Conclusions The risk of miscarriage varies greatly with maternal age, shows a strong pattern of recurrence, and is also increased after some adverse pregnancy outcomes. Miscarriage and other pregnancy complications might share underlying causes, which could be biological conditions or unmeasured common risk factors.”
That’s important, write that down.
aka if you go Third World and force women to start breeding too early, they’ll be more likely to miscarry healthy children in future. Mother Nature hates r-types.
“Results There were 421 201 pregnancies during the study period. The risk of miscarriage was lowest in women aged 25-29 (10%), and rose rapidly after age 30, reaching 53% in women aged 45 and over. There was a strong recurrence risk of miscarriage, with age adjusted odds ratios of 1.54 (95% confidence interval 1.48 to 1.60) after one miscarriage, 2.21 (2.03 to 2.41) after two, and 3.97 (3.29 to 4.78) after three consecutive miscarriages. The risk of miscarriage was modestly increased if the previous birth ended in a preterm delivery (adjusted odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.29), stillbirth (1.30, 1.11 to 1.53), caesarean section (1.16, 1.12 to 1.21), or if the woman had gestational diabetes in the previous pregnancy (1.19, 1.05 to 1.36). The risk of miscarriage was slightly higher in women who themselves had been small for gestational age (1.08, 1.04 to 1.13).”
LOWEST of all ranges in the mid-late 20s, which, per The World We Have Lost, happens to be the age our wiser medieval ancestors commonly married and commenced reproduction. Almost like they didn’t want their wife to die?
You can’t expect modern medicine to bail you out of degeneracy.
And forcing a woman to start “too early” (really before the pelvic growth plates fuse at 21) makes it more likely your later heirs will be miscarried too. No blaming the woman for your own impatience.
All those described factors sound r-selected, especially the C-section, which doctors shouldn’t be forcing women into for convenience. These are your future kids they’re risking.
This study isn’t precise enough because they try to dodge the teen death issue but here
“Figure 3 shows the age related risk of spontaneous abortion stratified by parity status and number of previous spontaneous abortions. The association between spontaneous abortion and age was similar in all strata, although the level increased with increasing number of previous spontaneous abortions.”
Similar. It isn’t a huge difference by age alone like you falsely claim, stop being dumb. However….
if we look at marriage survival against IQ (linked to years ago) and cross-reference the J-curve beneath, delayed motherhood (sufficient time to educate) is healthiest for society in terms of infant survival and marital longevity. Divorce is lower in high IQ women, who tend to marry later, which we can lump into the No Shit category.
Fridge horror: The early marriage of the poor CAUSED a lot of their baby deaths! aka The Oven Ain’t Done Yet!
Pedos reee but nature hates them to breed. They’re extreme r.
“The incidence of spontaneous abortion varied according to a woman’s parity and number of spontaneous abortions in the preceding 10 years; among women aged 25-29 years spontaneous abortion occurred in 8.9% of nulliparous women and 9.3% of parous women without a history of spontaneous abortion, in 12.4% and 11.8% of those with a history of one spontaneous abortion, and in 22.7% and 17.7% of those with a history of two spontaneous abortions. After three or more spontaneous abortions, the proportion of pregnancies ending in spontaneous abortion increased to 44.6% in nulliparous women and 35.4% in parous women.”
Personal history and then family history are more important than age. Men need to get this through their thick skull. This is like the IQ and beauty versus popularity and personality divide. A man who praises his wife’s ‘nice’ personality is admitting her ugliness. She isn’t docile, she doesn’t respect you. If we plan to outlive a man, what does his opinion matter? ‘Nice’ is a quality of puppies, not a viable sexual partner. Your level is the best woman you can get – and keep. Men forget the second part. Cheating on a great wife to lose her is stupid.
Widows were hot commodities because they had proven fertility. Especially great if their husband was stoned to death for adultery, so she’ll be quite young.
Do you want to bet on the horse that has won races or never raced?
If marrying a woman at the proper time, with no personal fertility history, ask about the oldest aunt of theirs who had kids.
Ideally, you’d hear 40s for a firstborn. Those are top-tier genes, especially if the child was perfectly healthy. No genetic load. Miscarriages are common though (about 10% under ideal conditions) and hard to tell early on so it isn’t an exact science. It’s odds, it’s probability. So it isn’t so much age, it’s familial genetic load of mutations compounded by time, it only seems like age. The mutations already in their DNA (and higher in men because sperm constantly need to renew) simply become more of what they already are.
The IVF people do not want normie people to discover the simple ways to ensure better fertility health, they’d go out of business if we had a simple eugenic questionnaire prior to marriage e.g. period frequency. Also, miscarriage is actually good if very early because print error kids get expensive. That’s a sign the body is doing what it should, miscarriages aren’t all created equal, only most are bad.
In future we could probably devise a spiteful mutant test prior to marriage. Very Gattaca. On second thought, that might actually be what the test was. Ks approve.
Obviously with age the mutants (only one parent need be) become more apparent, and this also determines things like aging facial bone structure too, but it isn’t CAUSED by age, it’s their genome!
Age is not the true variable, the confound is mutation burden in your DNA (inc germline). Age can estimate on a population level but I implore you, on an individual one, speak to the family for same-sex history up to cousin level, there’s a reason doctors ask about it! It allows them to adjust their predictions without prejudice.
In general women have less abortions young because 1. it counts the healthiest time to breed, the twenties, which conceals the brief increase in the teens, 2. white women conceal the worse stats for non-white women while still a technical majority and 3. they’d have less time to experience anything, there’s been less time alive. This assumes they’re even having sex. Age is a poor metric. Ask about Aunt Meryl with the four kids after 30. You may strike gold and the woman has twins in the family.
Miscarriage is a J-curve by age, NOT linear. Younger is not automatically better, learn maths dudebros.
Then we isolate the J-curve with no history:
Gee, why don’t the socialists encouraging teen pregnancies tell you this in Sex Ed class?
For my next trick, because I’m that bitch, compare the teen miscarriage line to other young women? [young being prior to middle-age, for women approx 40s]
It’s data from 1,221,546 pregnancy outcomes in a white country.
The mid-30s miscarriage risk is the same for that woman as a teen with the same history.
It’s a deeper 20s scoop if both example women had a miscarriage history of one.
Data doesn’t care about your deviance, pedos.
Mother Nature hates you. So those data-ignorant “dusty egg” jokes of mothers in their 30s should logically be applied to ‘teen whore’ types too. If you were being logical, which we all know you aren’t. Teen mothers (and fathers) also tend to have lower IQ, which suggests spiteful mutant. The data lines up perfectly.
They don’t really ‘believe’ in starting prematurely, it’s their life history strategy talking.
They feel a need to breed immediately because they know they’d likely miscarry if they waited like a K-type. Suck it?
“In women with no history of spontaneous abortions we found a slightly lower overall risk of spontaneous abortion among nulliparous women than parous women (10.0% v 11.6%). This tendency was found in all strata of age except for women aged 40-44 years. “
Again, actual women’s middle age. You’d expect that. The system is shutting up shop.
It’s slightly better to have had NO abortions than ONE. Duh? I think women would agree. So if that one spontaneous abortion would be likelier in the teens, should a fertility-oriented high IQ society encourage teen pregnancy?
The answer is clearly no.
And the Middle Ages Western Europeans were smarter than current America.
And you wonder why the white birth rate is so, so low.
“Among women with a history of spontaneous abortion, the reverse tendency was observed; in general, nulliparous women had a higher age specific risk than did parous women (fig (fig33).”
Stop getting this wrong. We need to avoid spontaneous abortions (miscarriages) to increase the birth rate. You can’t throw conceptions at the wall to see what sticks.
That’s a male perspective on women’s bodies and it’s demonstrably, mathematically wrong.
Not to mention stressful on the longsuffering wife.
Teens (biological children) have a higher pregnancy risk than adult, mature mothers:
“Under the assumption that only 80% of women with abortions in recognised pregnancies were hospitalised the risk of spontaneous abortion would be: 12-19 years, 13.3%; 20-24, 11.1%; 25-29, 11.9%; 30-34, 15.0%; 35-39, 24.6%; 40-44, 51.0%; and 45 or more, 93.4%.” that’s :-
Minor: 13.3% natural abortions
20s: 11.5% natural abortions
30s: 19.8% natural abortions (average, more variation)
40s: basically at least half. You’d need top tier DNA to survive that.
So stop lying, pedos. Call yourself hebe all you like, a POS by any other name.
This doesn’t factor in the mental trauma of giving birth, PTSD is quite common, discounting obvious cases like episiotomies without cause and C-sections with no pain relief. It happens.
Obviously, traumatising your teenage girls will put them off breeding altogether.
Then what happens to your precious ego birth rate?
The teen ectopic pregnancy rate also peaks in the teens comparable to a near-thirty year old.
DAT J-shape curve.
You mad, pedos?
Wait, there’s more!
Now onto stillbirths:
The rate for minors (teens) peaks at the same level as women in their late 30s.
That’s gotta hurt.
Good luck with your scientism though.I’m sure 1M+ white births are lying.
DAT 20s dip:
and it’s fractions of a percent, hardly apocalyptic is it? They’re such special snowflakes with the bloody victim complex.
“The association between maternal age and stillbirth showed a J-shaped curve, but the effect of age was less than for spontaneous abortions and ectopic pregnancies (fig (fig5).5). When restricting the analysis to nulliparous women, we found an identical pattern, although the level was slightly higher. The proportion of stillbirths was substantially increased in teenage pregnancies and was at the same level as for the 35-39 year age group. The incidence of stillbirth was unchanged during the study period.”
I’d also like to see a subdivision of dead babies risk in teen/minor mothers by aged daddy. Maybe next time. I covered paternal age generally beforehand anyway.
It’s funny that the paper writers still try to make it about age though. Nice try. Miscarriage is the biggest factor in future fertility according to their actual data, age is more important for niche risk of ectopic and stillbirth, but less so. And most importantly, NONE OF THIS IS LINEAR. NONE OF IT. The curve is a J. Redpills read the data. I don’t care what the researchers claim to get gibs, read the data itself. It is a non sequitur to claim older = worse outcomes and also a non sequitur to claim younger = better outcomes when the data doesn’t show that, it blatantly shows the opposite, a kind of Goldilocks effect in the 20s.
To put this all on increasing age is false reasoning, as shown, it’s increasing mutant burden. Age is a vector of genetic load, not the cause. Like – Being in a car is a vector of drunk driving, it isn’t the alcohol!
But they wanna get cited so…. they’ll twist their own data. Or try? God forbid anything be genetic, even reproduction!
nb “The increase in risk of ectopic pregnancies in teenage women is most likely caused by pelvic inflammatory disease.”
Teenagers are not women but k. And that’s wrong. The female human reproductive system takes time to fully develop. r/K explains this. Inflammation takes years, it’s literally impossible to blame that or 20s would be still higher.
“The risk of stillbirth was found to be high among teenagers, as previously reported.24 This may be a result of unfavourable social and behavioural conditions among pregnant teenagers, although a biological explanation cannot be excluded. The risk of stillbirth among women aged more than 35 years was increased but to a lesser extent….”
Our study shows an important increase in the risk of spontaneous abortion and other types of fetal loss among women aged more than 40 years”
Middle-age, then? Duh? The body’s aborting print errors like it should?
Yeah because like I said about the r/K system starting up, it also takes years to wind down?
Why aren’t you getting this?
“increase is already considerable among those in their 30s.”
no it isn’t data varies too much in that decade so you cannot accurately comment
“This increase is observed irrespective of a woman’s reproductive history.”
but that’s the bigger effect size? it’s the objectively more important factor?
Can’t hurt feels or lose those IVF shekels, huh?
The effect is still there but that’s a curious omission of scale.
“For society, such findings would indicate that tendencies to postpone pregnancy increase the overall incidence of fetal loss and possibly the costs of health care.”
ooooh they’re pushing teen pregnancies
“overall” POPULATION is not filial risk (personal risk)
filial risk is genetic, kin based
socialists shouldn’t be allowed to science
postponing in a K-select manner is MATURING
higher actual birth rate, higher maternal safety, higher child survival
healthier children! higher IQs!
WHAT IS THE DOWNSIDE
= fewer r-types, I weep!
“these factors are highly correlated” = NOT CAUSATION
for the reproductive equation, you must include the age of BOTH parents at conception
That’s the genetic equation of causation. Single parents are not up for discussion here, they didn’t impregnate themselves?!!
12-19 (minor/teen) pregnancies, not aborted: 51,132.
That’s a huge dataset of adverse pregnancy outcomes. How will the hebes recover?
“It might sound strange, but its true, this remedy has been passed around the feminist community since the 70’s, appearing in many grassroots publications, some of which are cited here. There are also numerous reports of women using it successfully from this era, I’ve heard many stories, but never saw any kind of documentation, which isn’t surprising in a time, where a woman’s right to choose an abortion and have access to safe legal abortion services was just being won.”
Great for ye olde days of gang rape though. Useful if the Red Army comes around town. Abortion does make sense where continuing would kill the mother so there is an ethical grey area e.g. ectopic. I acknowledge that. We also must know what kills a baby so all mothers know to AVOID it. This is why keeping women ignorant leaves them vulnerable to such evil. Parts of nature hate us. Wiccans are imbeciles.
This is why I don’t supplement liposomal Vitamin C, as I suggested for OLDER people.
“The scientists who conducted the research, Samborskaia and Ferdman came to the conclusion that high doses of Ascorbic Acid appeared to increase estrogen levels which contributed to the interruption of an otherwise normal pregnancy. 20 women who approached doctors requesting an abortion participated in the study. Research was conducted by ob/gyn L.I. Ivanyuta. The women ranged from 20 to 40 years of age. The article does not say if a positive pregnancy test was obtained from the participating women. We also don’t know how much ascorbic acid the women were given. They did however measure estrogen levels before and after treatment with ascorbic acid, finding that estrogen levels were higher after taking the ascorbic acid. Of the 20 women, 16 began menstrual type bleeding within 1 to 3 days from administration of ascorbic acid.”
It makes giving kids lemonade real sinister. Mountain Dew, Sunny D, the works.
“Vitamin C works to produce an unfavorable climate within the uterus so that the egg does not implant, or if implantation has already occurred, Vitamin C can weaken the fertilized ovum’s grip on the uterine wall. Possibly by stimulating estrogen, and interfering with progesterone. This also makes it useful as an emergency contraceptive, when taken before implantation occurs on the 6th day following ovulation. The hormone, progesterone is essential for pregnancy, its function is to prepare a nourishing bed for the fertilized egg, if there is not enough progesterone the uterus becomes less supportive to the egg. Which is desirable when the goal is to end pregnancy.”
Progesterone means pro-gestation. Anything that reduces that and/or increases oestrogen causes miscarriage, including xenoestrogens. BPA also causes genetic defects inc. Downs, and can cause abnormal egg development in a female fetus, which can go on to experience many miscarriages (modern rates?) and Downs children themselves.
Also NO parsley. Yes, it kill babies. Viva Italia some other time. Can be used to induce labour, ironically.
History will view the use of xenos as pure evil*. I think endometriosis is caused by it, like a poisoning. Explains the miscarriage common to it. Most common cause of infertility in women. Pure progesterone creams hard to come by, easier to patent a toxic variety close enough. Even pure creams can include preservatives that are oestrogenic! Vegan love of vit C may cause vegan menopause, imho. Xenos also cause premature puberty in girls as young as ONE, especially seen in high-estro skin products used by American blacks and not found in African ones. Xenos (including hops in beer**) also cause a small penis and breast development in boys/men. This shit should be BANNED forever in all skincare vehicles (10x more potent, bypassing liver filter). The amount required (parts per billion) is rarely tested for but maintains estrogenic effect at this level. Parabens were disused in some products due to this. Others like SLS and phthalates also. It isn’t hype, it’s killing men/women hormonally and babies silently. A silent killer in shampoo, lotion, food etc. No wonder American rates of miscarriage are so high. Test ALL skin products for endocrine disruption, especially those that break down into it (XENOS), in rats. Xenos can bio-accumulate for decades in the body (heard of DDT?) and stay for decades too. I share this hoping people won’t abuse the info.
*file under Molech
**how Anglos have gotten softer and softer and softer… literally and morally.
Synthetic perfume is also a xeno. Sorry. I’m sad about it too. They’re aiming this at teen girls and boys, who get fat. And in the case of girls, look sexual. The boys look twinkish. I’m sure the traffickers love that.
They blame kids for being fat when they’re hormonally drugged from seemingly everywhere. They cannot lose weight! The environment is too polluted!
Phyto-estrogen can bind protectively and reduce the capacity of xeno to attach. This is limited. It’s less potent but still oestrogenic and thus reduces progesterone. Can detox from the body in a matter of days since it’s natural.
Socialism kills. All Marxism is anti-natal, it’s the only thing it has in common. Hence, national socialism is fucking retarded, sorry. It doesn’t work. You can’t have a half-evil system. It makes people lazy, as we see:
A number of population scholars have asserted that social security programs such as old-age programs lead to decreased fertility levels because parents need not rely on children for “security” in old age. There is, however, a paucity of empirical data on the above. This paper analyzes 67 countries and shows that social security programs have a measurable negative effect on subsequent levels of fertility.
This might go down in history as the thing to doom the Boomers, demographically.
In fact, the social security programs appear to have as much of an independent impact on fertility as do the traditional correlates of fertility (infant mortality, education and per capita income).
Explains the sheer drop in fertility in places like Poland, and why places like Russia and China are currently bricking it.
Then you have fake Catholics like the French, fucking around and never marrying because there’s no stigma any longer. Socialism preserves a husk of civilization while hollowing out the core.
It’s popular for insecure morons to say higher education should be banned but it replaces ballrooms for the high IQ to meet one another. Education is K-select, that’s why Marxists have tried to destroy it. Would you rather they screw the local waitress and have dipshit kids? On your tax bill? Assortative mating must be enabled for a healthy, functioning society. Ban foreign students and there’s more room by far. Then you don’t have national security risks like the Chinese stealing missile data AMERICA.
College educated parents (yes, both) have higher IQ children. The right wing gets triggered over this and other facts where the universe doesn’t revolve around men (or women, but they don’t care there). As covered previously, most child IQ is inherited maternally. So we know it’s men to blame for fucking the dumb broads, who exhibit sexual selection like a leech being discerning in a blood bank. Stop fucking stupid women. At least, don’t be surprised when the kids are entitled douchebags. If your kids are stupid, and you think it isn’t you – it’s your choice of woman.
I think I’ve posted this before and I know I’ve recently spotlighted the dying demographic nations like Poland (lowest fertility rate in the EU).
But let’s look again and wonder how such steep changes could happen, shall we?
“Population growth in Eastern Europe is now negative, and Southern Europe is projected to join it with zero growth around 2005.
Western and Northern Europe, in contrast, are expected to maintain positive growth until around 2025 and 2040, respectively (figure 36). Declines in growth not only come earlier but are also much sharper in Eastern and Southern Europe than in Western and Northern Europe. Were international migration eliminated, zero growth in Western and Northern Europe would come instead much earlier, around 2005. With no migration, the growth trajectories for Western, Northern, and Southern Europe would still be roughly similar but would be pegged at a lower level, but the growth trajectory for Eastern Europe would be little changed. Looking beyond 2050, one sees each region return gradually to zero or slightly positive growth.”
But by all means think voting and anti-marriage propaganda will help…. It’s like demographic Santa. Babies can be wished into existence! What incentives? Also, EE, this is why you don’t traffic and pimp out your nubile young women to rich Arabs and STD-ridden tourists. You ate the demographic seed crop. If you continue to betray your women (fact: most white people are women) then you deserve to die out. Misogyny (as with misandry) are anti-natal. Figure 35 shows the wages of sin is death i.e. treason = extinction. The MRA/MGTOW anti-natal propaganda is largely the rejected gamma trying to genetically murder those above him (the coward’s way, Wormtongue) by fish bicycle logic. Surely you’re smarter than that? SJWs perform the same gamma/spiteful mutant function among women.
“The United Kingdom dominates Northern Europe demographically, with 64 per cent of regional population. Its growth trajectory is about 0.1 points higher than that for Northern Europe as a whole. The region also includes three small Baltic countries with economies in transition: Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Their growth trajectories are radically different, being even more negative than that for Eastern Europe. The remaining European countries with economies in transition are all in Eastern Europe, except for Albania and the successor states to Yugoslavia, which are in Southern Europe. However, growth in Albania and the former Yugoslav republics is not that different from, and actually slightly higher than, growth in Southern Europe as a whole. Southern Europe is dominated by Italy and Spain, whose projected slow growth is reflected in the regional trajectory.”
Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. Reprobate mind? Sexually decadent cultures?
“Projected fertility trends are consistent with the growth trends. Some initial fertility decline further below replacement is expected in this decade, except in Western Europe, where fertility is believed to have hit bottom in the early 1990s and has risen slightly since then (figure 38).” That’s Labour immigration policy.
“Each region is then assumed to reach total fertility of 1.85 by 2045-2050, with Northern and Western Europe progressing along a higher trajectory than Southern and Eastern Europe. Within the following quarter century, fertility is then expected to rise further to replacement level, with Southern Europe lagging behind the other regions.”
Yet I find it hilarious that Eastern Europe is taking the most degenerate of white trash immigrants, the PUAs. They’ll soon learn it isn’t even race of the immigrant, it’s whether they’ll render your local population infertile with STDs and cause local disruption with their carousing. Like the Vikings, they’ll take your women. It’s the rule. And if the local women refuse, like Taharrush, they’ll be forced. I’d expect druggings to become commonplace (including alcohol spikings) whenever PUAs move into an area.
Sort your incitement to rape laws NOW. Protect your culture. Don’t become like NY or London. Do not let the sexual locusts eat your nubile seed crop. r-types emigrate.
“Fertility stays at current levels in the constant projection scenario, which leads to incredibly large numbers for world population. For the European population, however, it leads instead, in the long run, to startlingly low numbers. By 2300, Western, Southern, and Northern Europe would each have only 28-30 million people, and Eastern Europe would have only 5 million. The European Union,which has recently expanded to encompass 452-455 million people (according to 2000 or 2005 figures) would fall by 2300 to only 59 million. About half the countries of Europe would lose 95 per cent or more of their population, and such countries as the Russian Federation and Italy would have only 1 per cent of their population left. Although one might entertain the possibility that fertility will never rise above current levels, the consequences appear sufficiently grotesque as to make this seem improbable.”
95 per cent or more of their population
and party countries like Italy and the world’s strip club Russia:
only 1 per cent of their population left
“sufficiently grotesque” is code for effective genocide folks
Also: You don’t judge whether something is POSSIBLE by emotional appeal.
See, you don’t need to kill everyone, just most of them, to prevent a functioning economy, especially the young people, and if you can keep them bachelors so much the better, because white people need to marry first before they breed. Distractions include careerism, the gym and notch counting.
“These changes take a century. Quicker societal adjustments are necessary when demographic change is rapid in the short-run, though such demographic changes tend to be more difficult to predict. Table 9 shows the highest and lowest growth rates expected for each country in any period between 2000 and 2300. Most of the largest positive growth rates appear in 2000-2005, while fertility is still high in various countries. The largest negative growth rates appear close to 2050 or beyond 2100, when countries enter a period of below-replacement fertility. European countries tend to show slowest growth earlier, African countries later, except for some Southern African countries where slow growth appears around 2020-2030 because of HIV/AIDS.”
or a SARs bioweapon.
Yet the anti-natal channels on Youtube are the only kind exempt from the so-called ‘redpill’ ban hammer.
Makes ya think. Activates the almonds. Rustles my jimmies. I wonder (((why))). They hate white males and they’re telling them to nix their genome with the snip or race mixing. I wonder why those channels are up? Why are so many pick-up artists non-white? And yes, that includes the Jews. When do we get the AQ – the Asian Question of them inserting themselves into our culture and policies? Hello fellow hwyte male. Let them slice your balls.
That’s the Boomer fallout, the consequences of all the dysgenic policies, from abortion to the Pill to free love/hook-up/whoredom to Asian and African immigration/invasion. I know some of you didn’t vote for it, it still exists. I’ll be considered generationally along Trigglypuff so deal with it.
TABLE 8 is a sobering read.
e.g. Croatia, millions of population, -27 by 2100, maximum 0% change. Stop importing degenerates.
Israel 63M by 2100, curious. 70% + max change. Almost like they knew.
Poland -33M by 2100. By all means, let degenerates immigrate. Make it worse.
BY contrast, Somali 658 million. Not a typo.
Serbia, -26 million by 2100. Were the shekels worth it?
I’m sorry I base my opinions on data.
By comparison, so-called cucked Sweden minus 8 million by 2100.
So Eastern Europe is literally worse off than the Swedes. Nobody says anything. Controlled ops.
UK gains 10M, mostly non-Anglo, I’d wager. The native pop is suppressed by (economic) factors and anti-marriage propaganda.
America gains 53M, mostly mystery meat if you look at new births and white deaths. Thanks, Boomers.
Yemen gains 700M. Not a typo.
“In 2000-2005, 56 countries, out of 192, have total fertility of 4.0 or higher. By 2045-2050, the number will be zero. Instead, 139 countries will have total fertility under 2.0. Beyond 2050, however, the progression is not unilinear. The number of countries with fertility below 2.0 will fall, as more and more countries return to a replacement level just above 2.0. But fertility levels of 2.2 or higher are not expected to return.”
So Marxism of any kind (including precious socialists) will go the way of the dodo. The production simply won’t be there to leech from.
You read the rest. This century, the white man dies. If they endorsed anti-natal practices, it’s deserved. Revenge is mine, saith the LORD.
We need exogenic wombs, it seems. Because there won’t be enough fertile women to go around.
Evaluation of human papilloma virus in semen as a risk factor for low sperm quality and poor in vitro fertilization outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
A review of the literature regarding ART outcomes showed an association between HPV infection and decreased PR, and an even stronger association between HPV infection and increased MR.
-increased miscarriage rate, lower odds of conceiving
Conclusion: Our meta-analysis shows a negative effect of HPV on sperm concentration, motility, and morphology. Further subgroup and categorical analysis confirmed the clinical significance of impaired sperm motility in HPV-infected sperm, although the sperm count and morphology must be carefully analyzed. The studies reviewed reported lower PR and increased MR in couples with HPV-infected sperm. As most studies had a moderate risk of bias, these observations warrant further large, well-designed studies before introducing clinical management recommendations.
Human papillomavirus infection and fertility alteration: a systematic review
Results: HPV infections are shown to be significantly associated to many adverse effects in the reproductive function. These adverse effects were reported in different levels from cells production to pregnancy and may be related to the infecting genotype.
Conclusions: It appears from this study that HPV detection and genotyping could be of great value in infertility diagnosis at least in idiopathic infertility cases. Like for the risk of carcinogenesis, another classification of HPV regarding the risk of fertility alteration may be considered after deep investigations.
Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and Fertilization: A Mini Review
Sorry but if something makes you less virile, you’re less of a man.
Human papilloma virus (HPV) is one of the most prevalent viral sexually transmitted diseases. The ability of HPV to induce malignancy in the anogenital tract and stomato-pharyngeal cavity is well documented. Moreover, HPV infection may also affect reproductive health and fertility. Although, the impact of HPV on female fertility has not been thoroughly studied it has been found also to have an impact on semen parameters. Relative information can be obtained from studies investigating the relationship between HPV and pregnancy success. Furthermore, there is an ongoing debate whether HPV alters the efficacy of assisted reproductive technologies. An association between HPV and assisted reproductive technologies (ART) programs has been reported. Nevertheless, due to conflicting data and the small number of existing studies further research is required. It remains to be clarified whether HPV detection and genotyping could be included in the diagnostic procedures in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatments. Vaccination of both genders against HPV can reduce the prevalence of HPV infection and eliminate its implications on human fertility. The aim of the present mini-review is to reiterate the association between HPV and human fertility through a systematic literature review.
The role of human papillomavirus on sperm function
I love how many yanks pull a Henry 8th and blame women for their own infertility, in this century.
Recent findings: HPVs are agents of the most common sexually transmitted disease and can lead to warts and cancers both in men and women. A high incidence of HPV infection has been demonstrated in sperm from sexually active men with and without risk factors for HPV and from infertile patients.
Semen infection is associated to an impairment of sperm parameters suggesting a possible role in male infertility. – really???
Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that when HPV is present in semen only a percentage of total cells are infected
-only? a? 100% is a percentage too…
and the virus can be localized in sperm or in exfoliated cells with different impact on sperm motility. Moreover, infected sperm are able to penetrate the oocyte, to deliver HPV genome in the oocyte and HPV genes can be actively transcribed by the fertilized oocyte.
-wouldn’t it be ironic if it made the kids or grandkids infertile instead? because they were conceived with it, a polluted germline
Recently an increased risk of pregnancy loss has been demonstrated in couples undergoing in-vitro fertilization and particularly when HPV DNA was present in semen samples of male partners.
– no blaming women this time, unless women haz sperm?
Summary: To date, no effective treatment, control strategy and prevention is provided for men despite the reported high incidence of HPV semen infection.
– no hurt their feefees? NAW
Because this infection in men is also a problem for partners, and because growing evidence suggests that semen infection may cause infertility and early miscarriage, more attention should be paid to male HPV infection. This study reviews the more recent literature about the role of HPV infection on sperm function and human reproduction.
– Manosphere fears this topic and all male degenerate accountability.
semen infection may cause infertility and early miscarriage
High-risk human papillomavirus in semen is associated with poor sperm progressive motility and a high sperm DNA fragmentation index in infertile men
Does the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) in semen impact seminal parameters and sperm DNA quality in white European men seeking medical help for primary couple’s infertility?
>STD >DNA quality >in the germline of >white men
Never talk about it, I’m sure it’ll be fine.
HPV seminal infections involving high-risk (HR) genotypes are associated with impaired sperm progressive motility and sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) values.
HPV is commonly present in semen samples.
No? F no it’s not. Stop sparing slutty blushes.
The overall rate of HPV positivity was 15.5%
so 1 in 7, uncommon at best. No normalizing pathology please.
And it varies majorly by race and sexuality. Not sex because it’s sexual, obviously.
Sperm progressive motility was significantly lower (P = 0.01) while SDF values were higher (P = 0.005) in HPV+ men compared to those with no HPV. In particular, HR HPV+ men had lower sperm progressive motility (P = 0.007) and higher SDF values (P = 0.003) than those with a negative HPV test. Univariable analysis showed that HR HPV+ was associated with impaired sperm progressive motility (P = 0.002) and SDF values (P = 0.003). In the multivariable analysis, age, FSH levels and testicular volume were significantly associated with impaired sperm progressive motility (all P ≤ 0.04). Conversely BMI, CCI, smoking habits and HPV status were not. Only age (P = 0.02) and FSH (P = 0.01) were significantly associated with SDF, after accounting for BMI, CCI, testicular volume, smoking habits and HPV status.
Impact of human papillomavirus infection in semen on sperm progressive motility in infertile men: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) has been considered as one of the most common sexually transmitted viruses that may be linked to unexplained infertility in men. The possible mechanisms underlying correlation between HPV infection and infertility could be related to the altered sperm parameters. Current studies have investigated the effect of HPV seminal infection on sperm quality in infertile men, but have shown inconsistent results.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CNKI for studies that examined the association between HPV seminal infection and sperm progressive motility. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Outcomes were the sperm progressive motility rate. Results are expressed as standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was evaluated by the I-square (I2) statistic.
Results: Ten studies were identified, including 616 infertile patients with HPV seminal infection and 2029 infertile controls without HPV seminal infection. Our meta-analysis results indicated that sperm progressive motility was significantly reduced in HPV-infected semen samples compared with non-infected groups [SMD:-0.88, 95% CI:-1.17 ~ – 0.59]. There existed statistical heterogeneity (I2 value: 86%) and the subgroup analysis suggested that study region might be the causes of heterogeneity.
Conclusions: HPV semen infection could significantly reduce sperm progressive motility in infertile individuals. There were some limitations in the study such as the differences in age, sample sizes and the number of HPV genotypes detected. Further evidences are needed to better elucidate the relationship between HPV seminal infection and sperm quality.
The prevalence of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection in the oligospermic and azoospermic men
The current study shows that HPV infection can affect on sperm count and motility and decrease count of sperm cell and decrease motility capability of these cells.
Among 50 confirmed oligospermic male, 15 were HPV DNA positive (30%).
In azoospemic group we had 8 HPV DNA positive (40%) and in normal group just 3 of 20(15%) samples were positive.
-what r the odds?
we found statistical significant relationship for sperm count (p<0.05) and sperm motility (slow) (p<0.05) in oligospermic group positive samples compared with negative. In the present study, 13 HPV genotypes were detected among positive samples. HPV genotypes 16, 45 in the high risk group and 6,11,42 in the low risk group were more frequent than the others.
Semen washing procedures do not eliminate human papilloma virus sperm infection in infertile patients
had HPV DNA on sperm and exfoliated cells. Sperm washing centrifugation showed no changes in the number of infected samples and in the percentage of infected cells. Ficoll and swim-up protocols induced a slight reduction in the number of infected samples (30 and 26, respectively).
no muh scientism and IVF cope
This study demonstrated that conventional sperm selection rarely eliminates HPV sperm infection. More attention should be paid to the reproductive health of infected patients because, not only can HPV be transmitted, but it may also have a negative effect on development of the fetus.
a negative effect on development of the fetus
so even if they all married a virgin waifu, they’d infect her and have defective babies comedy GOLD, 24K.
Is HPV the Novel Target in Male Idiopathic Infertility? A Systematic Review of the Literature
Infertility is an important health problem that affects up to 16% of couples worldwide.
1 in 7, where have I heard THAT before….? [scroll up]
Male infertility is responsible for about 50% of the cases,
–NAY, men are never responsible for their own in/fertility, have you been online recently?
and the various causes of male infertility may be classified in pre-testicular (for example hypothalamic diseases), testicular, and post-testicular (for example obstructive pathologies of seminal ducts) causes. Sexually transmitted infections (STI) are increasingly widely accepted by researchers and clinicians as etiological factors of male infertility. In particular, several recent reports have documented the presence of HPV in seminal fluid and observed that sperm infection can also be present in sexually active asymptomatic male and infertile patients.
In this review, we aimed to perform a systematic review of the whole body of literature exploring the impact of HPV infection in natural and assisted fertility outcomes, from both an experimental and a clinical point of view. Starting from in-vitro studies in animals up to in-vivo studies in humans, we aimed to study and evaluate the weight of this infection as a possible cause of idiopathic infertility in males with any known cause of conception failure.
Significant Correlation between High-Risk HPV DNA in Semen and Impairment of Sperm Quality in Infertile Men
guess the result
go on think
A total of 140 subjects participated in the current study. Among 70 confirmed infertile males, only 8 (11.43%) cases tested positive for high-risk HPV and all fertile men were HPV-negative. This data revealed a significant association between high-risk HPV and male infertility (P=0.03). The percentage of normal sperm morphology and sperm motility rate significantly declined in men infected with HPV (P<0.001).
and all fertile men were HPV-negative
oof and the sluts of both sexes are dying out, I am distraught. The genetics of the future are fairing brighter than you’d think.
Conclusion: There was a significantly higher prevalence of high-risk HPV in infertile men than fertile men. HPV infection seemed to be a risk factor for male infertility. Additional, larger studies should be conducted to confirm the impact of HPV on male infertility.
Player burnout shall henceforth be dubbed HPV-driven infertility?
Association between human papillomavirus infection and sperm quality: A systematic review and a meta-analysis
Human papillomavirus (HPV) has a high incidence rate in both males and females.
-maybe where you live
HPV infection in women has been shown to affect fertility and lead to foetal death and pregnancy loss. However, research on HPV infection in men is limited.
-well the husbands are freshly infecting the wives so–
-Ashley Madison wasn’t full of women stepping out, was it?
The aim of this study was to study the effect of HPV infection in semen on sperm quality and present the findings of previous studies through a meta-analysis. Databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, WanFang data and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for relevant studies. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed, and 17 studies were included for analyses based on a set criterion. Meta-analyses indicated that HPV infection in semen significantly reduced sperm concentration (SMD = -0.12, 95% CI: -0.21 to -0.03, p = .009), sperm motility (SMD = -0.55, 95% CI: -0.780 to -0.33, p = .000), sperm viability (SMD = -0.55, 95% CI: -0.780 to -0.33, p = .000) and sperm morphology (SMD = -0.34, 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.07, p = .015). The high-risk HPV (HrHPV) infection could significantly reduce sperm count (SMD = -0.65, 95% CI: -1.11 to -0.18, p = .007) compared with high-risk HPV (LrHPV) infection.
In conclusion, HPV infection in semen significantly reduced sperm quality, and the HrHPV infection could significantly reduce sperm count compared with LrHPV.
tick tock goes your biological clock, nobody can wait as long as they want NOBODY
Male sperm quality and risk of recurrent spontaneous abortion in Chinese couples: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Conclusions: The results of this analysis support an association of sperm density, sperm viability, sperm progressive motility rate, normal sperm morphology rate, sperm deformity rate, as well as sperm DFI with RSA.
IF you conceived, magically, it would kill your baby. REPEATEDLY.
Semen parameters and sperm morphology in men in unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion, before and during a 3 year follow-up period
Baby death aborts the defective DNA, HPV fucks with your sperm’s DNA. Water is wet.
HPV makes you biologically unfit. According to the ultimate test, the womb.
To investigate the role of the ‘male factor’ in the pathogenesis of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA), especially sperm morphology abnormalities, 120 previously selected couples with unexplained RSA were studied for sperm parameters retrospectively and prospectively. The patients were subdivided into three subgroups, depending on their reproductive outcome during the 3 years of follow-up study: (i) 48 RSA couples who achieved a successful pregnancy; (ii) 39 RSA couples who experienced further abortions, and (iii) 33 RSA couples who experienced infertility during the follow-up period. A semen analysis was performed twice at the time of inclusion in this study, and twice again during the 3 year follow-up period. No significant differences in semen parameters were observed between RSA males and fertile controls. Instead, significant differences were observed between the group of RSA couples who experienced infertility during the follow-up and the other two groups (RSA couples who achieved successful pregnancy and RSA couples who experienced miscarriages and no live birth during the follow-up) for sperm concentration (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01 respectively), sperm motility (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01 respectively) and sperm morphology abnormalities (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01 respectively).
Sperm DNA fragmentation in couples with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortions
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the degree of sperm DNA fragmentation in couples with idiopathic recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) and in those with no history of infertility or abortion. In this cohort study, 30 couples with RSA and 30 fertile couples as control group completed the demographic data questionnaires, and their semen samples were analysed according to World Health Organization (WHO) standards (September 2009-March 2010) for evaluation of sperm DNA fragmentation, using sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) technique. The percentage of morphologically normal sperm was significantly lower in RSA patients compared with control group (51.50 ± 11.60 versus 58.00 ± 9.05, P = 0.019), but not in other parameters. Additionally, the level of abnormal DNA fragmentation in the RSA group was significantly higher than in the control group (43.3% versus 16.7%, P = 0.024). Our results indicated a negative correlation between the number of sperm with progressive motility and DNA fragmentation (r = -0.613; P < 0.001). The sperm from men with a history of RSA had a higher incidence of DNA fragmentation and poor motility than those of the control group, indicating a possible relationship between idiopathic RSA and DNA fragmentation.
Sperm chromatin integrity may predict future fertility for unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion patients
“unexplained” – just assume the echo for comedic effect by now
The RSA group was further separated into three subgroups, depending on their reproductive outcome during the 12 months after they were enrolled in the study: the pregnancy subgroup consisted of 43 men whose partners achieved a successful pregnancy up to at least the 24th week of gestation; the abortion subgroup included 31 men whose partners experienced further abortions; and the infertile subgroup had 37 men whose partners did not have any positive pregnancy test after regular, unprotected intercourse. Significantly lower proportion of sperm with normal morphology was found in the abortion subgroup (14.7 ± 4.3%) than in the control group (17.5 ± 5.0%). Sperm concentrations were significantly lower in the infertile subgroup (55.7 ± 24.1%) than in the controls (68.6 ± 27.8%). The rates of abnormal sperm chromatin integrity were significantly higher in the abortion (16.7 ± 7.7%) and infertile (16.3 ± 6.6%) subgroups, compared to the control group (13.0 ± 4.4%). Logistic regression analysis showed that the subsequent reproductive outcome of the 111 RSA patients was negatively correlated to the rates of abnormal sperm chromatin integrity. In conclusion, sperm chromatin integrity, sperm morphology, and sperm concentration were associated with future reproductive outcome of RSA patients. The sperm chromatin integrity was a significant predictor for future abortion and infertility.
But men are never responsible for miscarriage, perish the THOUGHT.
Cytochemical evaluation of sperm chromatin and DNA integrity in couples with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortions
unexplained….. sigh, ok.
Our study showed that in the cases of RSA, slow motility had a significant reduction in comparison with controls and also spermatozoa of men from RSA group had less chromatin condensation and poorer DNA integrity than spermatozoa that obtained from fertile men with no history of RSA.
Human sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation by specific types of papillomavirus
Conclusion: Human papillomavirus type 16 and 31 deoxyribonucleic acid caused deoxyribonucleic acid breakages characteristic of apoptotic but not necrotic sperm.
The data suggest that these human papillomavirus types may adversely affect subsequent embryonic development after fertilization. Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid appears to resist human papillomavirus types 18, 33, and 6/11 or repairing mechanisms occurred. Although enhanced motility was found in human papillomavirus–exposed sperm, important velocity parameters were decreased, suggesting impaired sperm function.
Negative Impact of Elevated DNA Fragmentation and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Presence in Sperm on the Outcome of Intra-Uterine Insemination (IUI)
i.e. no, you won’t just get IVF
We wanted to determine the sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) cutoff for clinical pregnancies in women receiving intra-uterine insemination (IUI) with this sperm and to assess the contribution of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection on sperm DNA damage and its impact on clinical pregnancies. Prospective non-interventional multi-center study with 161 infertile couples going through 209 cycles of IUI in hospital fertility centers in Flanders, Belgium. Measurement of DFI and HPV DNA with type specific quantitative PCRs (HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 66 and 68) in sperm before its use in IUI. Clinical pregnancy (CP) rate was used as the outcome to analyze the impact on fertility outcome and to calculated the clinical cutoff value for DFI. A DFI criterion value of 26% was obtained by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Couples with a male DFI > 26% had significantly less CPs than couples with DFI below 26% (OR 0.0326; 95% CI 0.0019 to 0.5400; p = 0.017). In sperm, HPV prevalence was 14.8%/IUI cycle. Sperm samples containing HPV had a significantly higher DFI compared to HPV negative sperm samples (29.8% vs. 20.9%; p = 0.011). When HPV-virions were present in sperm, no clinical pregnancies were observed. More than 1 in 5 of samples with normal semen parameters (17/78; 21.8%) had an elevated DFI or was HPV positive. Sperm DFI is a robust predictor of clinical pregnancies in women receiving IUI with this sperm. When DFI exceeds 26%, clinical pregnancies are less likely and in vitro fertilization techniques should be considered
When HPV-virions were present in sperm, no clinical pregnancies were observed.
Sperm viral infection and male infertility: focus on HBV, HCV, HIV, HPV, HSV, HCMV, and AAV
Chronic viral infections can infect sperm and are considered a risk factor in male infertility. Recent studies have shown that the presence of HIV, HBV or HCV in semen impairs sperm parameters, DNA integrity, and in particular reduces forward motility. In contrast, very little is known about semen infection with human papillomaviruses (HPV), herpesviruses (HSV), cytomegalovirus (HCMV), and adeno-associated virus (AAV). At present, EU directives for the viral screening of couples undergoing assisted reproduction techniques require only the evaluation of HIV, HBV, and HCV.
-all trust the EU guys
However, growing evidence suggests that HPV, HSV, and HCMV might play a major role in male infertility and it has been demonstrated that HPV semen infection has a negative influence on sperm parameters, fertilization, and the abortion rate.
-somebody else look up herpes, I’m lazy
Besides the risk of horizontal or vertical transmission, the negative impact of any viral sperm infection on male reproductive function seems to be dramatic.
-Really, f-ing fascinating!
In addition, treatment with antiviral and antiretroviral therapies may further affect sperm parameters. In this review we attempted to focus on the interactions between defined sperm viral infections and their association with male fertility disorders. All viruses considered in this article have a potentially negative effect on male reproductive function and dangerous infections can be transmitted to partners and newborns. In light of this evidence, we suggest performing targeted sperm washing procedures for each sperm infection and to strongly consider screening male patients seeking fertility for HPV, HSV, and HCMV, both to avoid viral transmission and to improve assisted or even spontaneous fertility outcome
HPV infection in semen: results from a new molecular approach
Let’s get molecular.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the agent of the most common sexually transmitted diseases causing a variety of clinical manifestations ranging from warts to cancer. Oncogenic HPV infection is the major cause of cervical cancer and less frequently of penile cancers. Its presence in semen is widely known, but the effects on fertility are still controversial. – how? allergic to facts?
We developed a new approach to evaluate virus localisation in the different semen components. We analysed also the specific genotype localisation and viral DNA quantity by qPCR. Results show that HPV DNA can be identified in every fraction of semen: spermatozoa, somatic cells and seminal plasma. Different samples can contain the HPV DNA in different fractions and several HPV genotypes can be found in the same fraction. Additionally, different fractions may contain multiple HPV genotypes in different relative quantity. We analysed the wholeness of HPV DNA in sperm cells by qPCR. In one sample more than half of viral genomes were defective, suggesting a possible recombination event. The new method allows to easily distinguish different sperm infections and to observe the possible effects on semen. The data support the proposed role of HPV in decreased fertility and prompt new possible consequences of the infection in semen.
>HPV DNA can be identified in every fraction of semen: spermatozoa, somatic cells and seminal plasma
If you’re wondering why your nation is infertile, look in the mirror. Mutant sperm.
For pushing the very anti-natal propaganda you recognise ruined the Boomers generally.
No “muh birth rate” kvetching. Especially when many men are 50% responsible for chemical abortions by conceiving with a woman on the Pill. Gametes fuse into a zygote, that’s conception, genetically. A new being conceived.
it’s like a bad joke, how do you make white men genocide themselves?
you make sterility a virtue signal
Social and economic shifts in the U.S. are visible through the lens of the country’s marriage rate, measured as the number of marriages per 1,000 people. That rate has fluctuated since the early 1900s, most notably around times of great historical significance, according to the report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
For example, the marriage rate reached 12 per 1,000 in 1929 – the advent of the Great Depression – before falling to 7.9 in 1932. It then began a sporadic but upward climb, reaching an all-time high of 16.4 as the country emerged from World War II in 1946. The marriage rate fluctuated for the most part until the early 1980s, the data shows.
From 1982 to 2009, marriage rates fell fairly steadily, and then hovered around 6.8 to 7 per 1,000 through 2017.
Your anti-natal propaganda is worse than the Great Depression.
and other white men laugh at you, behind your back
from a vasectomy story:
solipsism, it has a name
Should add genetic suicide.
Make corrupting the youth a crime again. It causes literally most of our demographic problems.
re UK, repost for SEO
fertility is economic, including the social/female requirement of marriage first
A large part of the decline in birth rates can be directly accounted for by a factor unlikely to be influenced by those birth-targeted incentives: marriage. That is, most long-run change in fertility can be accounted for by changes in the marital composition of society.
Memorise this chart and imagine me slapping you every time you blame something else.
Essentially all of the decline in fertility since 2001 can be explained by changes in the marital composition of the population.
Married, single, and divorced women are all about as likely, controlling for age and marital status, to have kids now as they were in 2001.
But today, a smaller proportion of women are married during those peak-fertility years.
You all disgust me.
Five minutes of basic research, you basic bitches of redpill.
And the guys who pushed it, you knew about them too. You knew what they were about. No blaming the out-group.