When are we revoking his suffrage?

It was universal, remember.

The trolls who want to divide the right and say women this, women that on no grounds go curiously silent on cases like this. There’s data to support what I’m saying.

You can’t claim (factor) unless you also control related factors.

It would be akin to the deception of measuring energy levels but not controlling for caffeine intake and it’s bad science.

In this case, demographic factors: it’s gender, race and age.

Those are salient here. They have a large effect size on the final result (voting choice).

e.g.

Gender, controlled for race (self report):

In voting as in biology, race is a bigger factor in voting behaviour than sex.
None of the trolls (shills) mention this because they don’t actually know the HBD and/or they want white people divided by lying to you.

Voting behaviour by race, the one chart you NEED:

That Other includes the mixed-race children of White Trump supporters.

They know this factor is most important, they have studied specifically this fact.

http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/campaigns/n357.xml

Meaning I had to tell you. November might rest on whether the right is dumb enough to spread their lies and put off their patriotic allies as a lost cause.
And I think the white female data is grossly distorted down because… CNN.

Reconcile, self-report to the CNN shit you’re blindly believing.

52% Trump, 43% Clinton self-report.
54% Clinton, 42% Trump, CNN et al.

They’ve flipped it in favour of… Clinton, and you believe that fake news?

Why can’t you question this online? Why isn’t posting fake poll data illegal?

Unless you take the shill’s line that white women should be held responsible (and banned from voting, convenient for Cabal!) for the voting patterns of non-white women?

If you’re bringing in restrictions on anything, gender is smallest factor.
Age is a bigger factor.

Logically, the limit should then be 40+. If you mean it.

As you can see, being white is the biggest Trump factor, being older/more experienced and then the tiniest edge within the male group within chance levels (the no answers have it). And that’s given the low, low probability CNN+ hasn’t just fudged the data.

They lie to women because, frankly, a lot of us are like lemmings and will vote however they (Americans) are TOLD other women are voting. The shills are lying about that, it’s disinfo, don’t empower their voting lies, the habits the Dems push aren’t true.

i’d be alright with that

Since the average woman now has more valuable skills than the average man, we’ll always make money. Robots are replacing the bloke jobs (on purpose, no unions). And you can’t stop people creating value, money is just an easy barter.

What, stop women cooking, cleaning, making things?

BARBARA, PUT DOWN THE KNITTING NEEDLES!!!

SANDRA, ARE YOU MAKING JAM???

SUSY, THAT BETTER NOT BE A TRAY OF COOKIES I SMELL!!!

I could buy way more male votes with all that sweet, sweet cash.

Please, please, I am begging you, give me the option not to fund my own genocide with taxes to give up something that doesn’t matter anyway. Votes don’t win elections, child. Bribing politicians does.

The technical term is “speaker’s fees”.

They think women are thick, don’t they? We always win, darling. Always.

Hypothetically, if women can’t control their own finances, they’d get a sex-exclusive Universal Basic Income from all tax-paying men. See? Still win.

They say the Church is oppressive but that was a voluntary 10%.

A tithe only goes to other, good Christians.

18th century American women voting

No, the 20th century didn’t ruin your country.

You were meritocratic.

Click to access Lewis.pdf

For a brief period after the American Revolution, some women
were allowed to vote, in one of the thirteen new states. The New
Jersey Constitution of 1776 enfranchised not only men who met the
property requirement but women as well. The specific language:

[A]ll inhabitants of this Colony, of full age, who are worth fifty
pounds proclamation money, clear estate in the same, and have
resided within the county in which they claim a vote for twelve
months immediately preceding the election, shall be entitled to vote
for Representatives in Council and Assembly; and also for all other
public officers, that shall be elected by the people of the county at
large

No taxation without… ah, that’s right!

Representation!

Wait – it gets weirder. Other states.

Click to access freeblacksconstitution.pdf

Before 1820, free black men could vote and white women couldn’t.

So much for your IQ and race realism, huh?

Plenty of states were just male supremacist and misogynist, regardless of qualification.

[Checked: Deadlink from bookmarks, damn. Well, 1820 was the date to look up.]

Now you know why the first feminists were generally “white supremacists*“, because if you let someone you consider subhuman vote before your sister, something isn’t right. Clearly, that person isn’t meritocratic, AKA the American Way. Let the person who can (usually) barely read and write have a say, against the highly educated, who can’t?

Women were preferentially home-schooled with a governess, which we now know is better!
Plus finishing school, which everyone forgets. Bring back those.

They ended black and female voting in New Jersey in 1807 because white MEN were dressing in drag or blackface to cast extra votes.

Sounds fair.

*They wanted to be treated the same as black men so I dunno how that logic works.

It’s funny when I must correct Americans on their own sodding history.

If it weren’t so sad.

And where’s the female incentive to contribute to a society that provides no incentive?

This isn’t Communism, everyone needs incentives. Women aren’t respected by men generally as feminine or wives any more…so fewer are feminine or wives. People can (and do) suppress their natural instincts if society actively punishes them for it (say, you lose the Vote when you marry), a dysgenic outcome. And men are suppressing their paternal instinct because losers on the internet disrespect fatherhood as stupid (but Homer Simpson is insulting!).

Nobody can honestly answer that question. Incentives must come to the individual, so the reward can’t be another person e.g. men, children. And men had the “reward” of a family too, plus the Vote (when property ownership was dropped). Ancient tribes survived because they were meritocratic. You contribute, you have a say. This includes the choice to elect representatives, those representatives don’t get to turn around and limit the Producers in the society that supports their existence. And who produces more vitally than women?

Homogeneity is based on shared values and fair incentives. So for example, everyone values Christian charity and all members could have a seat at the table for free food if they fell on hard times.

It’s like how lower class men have been too stupid to realize they celebrated their own replacement for the profiteering of the rich men. Robots work in factories instead of you. Drones are soldiers instead of you. Immigrants in lower-middle job roles like taxi driver and cook, instead of you. And you welcome sexbots? Seriously?

Men celebrate their replacement for laziness and cowardice and wonder why they’re in a weaker bargaining position.

Less contribution (more restriction), less incentive rewarded.

You cut off your own opportunity, welcome to the inevitable outcome.

Universal suffrage for men

Happened over a century.

Male suffrage activists were far more annoying to men than female ones, who simply wanted parity. If you’d let the village drunk get a vote before the aristocrat’s daughter, there is a problem.

I wonder why women eventually got it, despite how it took HALF A CENTURY. We don’t hear about the repeated efforts of men to get their vote.

“The parliamentary franchise in the United Kingdom was expanded and made more uniform through a series of Reform Acts, also known as Representation of the People Acts, beginning in 1832.

Reform Act 1832 (often called the “Great Reform Act” or “First Reform Act”), which applied to England and Wales and gave representation to previously underrepresented urban areas and extended the qualifications for voting
Scottish Reform Act 1832, a similar reform applying to Scotland
Irish Reform Act 1832, a similar reform applying to Ireland
Reform Act 1867 (also called the “Second Reform Act”), which widened the franchise and adjusted representation to be more equitable
Ballot Act 1872 (sometimes called the “Reform Act of 1872”), which introduced the secret ballot
Corrupt and Illegal Practices Prevention Act 1883 (sometimes called the “Reform Act of 1883”), which introduced campaign spending limits
Reform Act 1884 (also called the “Third Reform Act”), which allowed people in counties to vote on the same basis as those in towns. Home ownership was the only qualification
Redistribution of Seats Act 1885 (sometimes called the “Reform Act of 1885”), which split most multi-member constituencies into multiple single-member ones
Reform Act 1918 (also called the “Fourth Reform Act”), which abolished property qualifications for men and introduced limited female suffrage, for women over the age of 30
Reform Act 1928 (also called the “Fifth Reform Act”), which widened suffrage by giving women electoral equality with men”

Yes, I’m quoting wikipedia. It’s that basic and you should be ashamed not to know it.
Uneducated men easily led by the siren song of socialism* were given the vote before upper-class, well bred graduate women! So much for IQ!
(Class is heavily IQ based especially if you compare upper to lower).

Stop lying about it.

You can be debunked with wikipedia, Vox Day, stop talking about it.
Women wanting a vote given how many idiots got it for decades before is not something to shame.

Logically we’d base it on

  1. a minimum IQ (say, 98)
  2. tax contributions that year
  3. property ownership assuming the main tax is property
  4. 25+ when the body is fully mature.

The sexes aren’t different enough for that to be a factor here. Race and class are much, much bigger. Ah but he won’t touch those with a bargepole, too realistic. Just ignore the HBD…

We value a driver’s license over a minimum IQ license to vote!

Technically, every policy should legally be proposed to the voter with a financial amount that it would cost them to implement, personally. *Per voter figures. As in, you can’t shirk your responsibility for the things you vote in. If the amount needed to implement goes over that estimated figure, it’s put to another vote.

How did UK women vote in 2017?

+5% conservative on the last election.

https://yougov.co.uk/news/2017/06/13/how-britain-voted-2017-general-election/
Conservative leaning. Again.
Fuck you. Do your research before insulting us.

This election was literally split down the middle, unlike the past one I covered.
Why does this matter?
Record number of women standing and a record number of women not voting (reported 2015).
If you look at the most well-known left-leaning in sum, Labour+Lib Dems+SNP = 51% of men voted for the far Lefties.
Men are not getting smarter.

Shall we revoke their suffrage?
On what grounds?
The right to vote includes the right to abstain or vote stupid.
In this case, suicidal.

Ah, but this wasn’t predicted, say the wrong people.

https://yougov.co.uk/news/2017/04/25/demographics-dividing-britain/

“However, these two things cancelled each other out meaning that ultimately the Conservatives polled about the same amongst both men and women. Going into the 2017 election women are, if anything, slightly more (three percentage points) likely overall to vote Tory.”

Quit blaming us. It’s the working class men and the signalling middle.
The margins are so wafer-thin if you got those in order, there’d be no problem.

As you can see in that article and the first one, the classes vote more reliably than the sexes, and the races even more than that (for more/less Gov).
Women were never really banned from voting, that’s another piece of American BS.
Choose a new meme, you look silly to anyone who looks this up.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/01/20/womens-suffrage-is-a-feminist-frame-actually-universal/

Actual hatefacts to offend everyone

OR
Nevermind, your fear is completely justified.

Feel free to make your own.

So let’s talk about the Red Pill, shall we?

This little red pill where any group is magically exempt from criticism… almost like a privilege. Offense is “how dare you imply my demographic is morally fallible!”

Shall we?

 

Roosh is trying to outgroup r-types

Grasping at relevance, huh?

I’m not gonna link since that’d be throwing money at it.

Instead

https://poseidonawoke.wordpress.com/2017/03/10/on-rooshs-moderate-half-measure

Here’s the comment I made, which sums it up nicely.

Actually women have been the sex voting more rightward in Europe and recent trends in voting have made women swing conservative in general (over men) but Roosh has never let facts intrude on a piece of ‘satire’. Just look at recent elections and referenda, and still he …blames women, a majority of the population with enough numbers to swing it. American women are not typical of the world’s supply and Europeans are sick of reading that particular lie. Essentially, he’s arguing to strip low-commitment, low-loyalty r-types of the right to vote, without naming the r-type (because he is one). We used to do that with property requirements, since r-types are nomadic and property taxes were the only taxes (so you vote for where your money goes or don’t vote). That was not equal, but fair. Also, it wasn’t ‘women’s suffrage’ but universal, women’s suffrage is a feminist myth. Learning history is hard when male power-trip fantasy is so much more alluring than looking at the demographics data of recent elections.

I forgot to mention Millennial women are more conservative than their living predecessors.

And Gen Z are heavily conservative too.

Facts are hard when you’re a degenerate liar.

From here on out it’s an explanation of the r-psychology, with Roosh as Exhibit Gay. [this definition] It’s bitchy to match their level since, if you’re going to attack people randomly, expect them to get defensive.

A little on Europe.

The First World is the only place its values exist in the universe, we developed these with major wars, some civil wars and major historical reformations and enlightenments. We earned this way of life. These people, historical enemies, stepped into our house (without invitations) and took all the goodies paid for with our ancestor’s blood. They expect to get more than they give and skip the country whenever they like, owing us nothing. They’re already on thin ice with their treatment of our too-kind Christian hospitality (from pathological altruism, still finite ). Anyone questions these fundamentals and we come down on them like a ton of bricks. This is OURS, get bent. They totally deserve that rejection for rejecting what makes us, Us, and therefore worthy of their pillaging, because if they want to sample Non-First World living, go ahead. Good riddance. Except those people are narcissists and can’t stand to think of the First World being happy. They’re toxic civilization-breakers. Fifth columnists, saboteurs and snitches.

Like we’re all too dumb to notice the past and present runnings of our native countries. All hundreds of millions of us in civilized Europe. And yes, we need the advice of foreign mystery meat! Because white men in Europe are incompetent, right Roosh?

Everything about Europe was shit until you got here!! For millennia we have struggled! Thank the gods you’ve finally arrived! You’ve been so good for the people of every nation you’ve ‘banged’!

Common sense would argue:

If some people are unworthy of First World rights, simply deport them to where they belong.

Not all countries or its genetic Volk can uphold the glories of First World liberty. OK. Not everyone can be smart enough or capable enough to run things to the highest known standard.

Everyone will be better off! Everyone will be happier! We’ll stop trying to turn a cat into a dog by putting a leash on it and truly embrace cultural diversity! …except the narcissists. Who are only happy when this applies: misery loves company. Basically, never take a narcissist’s advice on the Good Thing To Do. They lack the empathy. Relational narcissism is a thing.

Which country is the Sodom of our times? The one we should take as a negative case study? The one who started this Melting Pot shit? The one obsessed with materialism, gangster culture and money?

America is the paragon of patriarchal virtues! Let’s all listen to those guys!

You don’t get a pat on the head for doing your adult duties.

Seriously, the US must have all its statute up online like the Parliament website.
I’ve seen various congressional and state ruling paperwork, but they never go over it and examine their priors.

I would myself but then I’ll be accused of bias for being both foreign and female.
I have however broken down election data on my own country, various demographic data by race, sex and age. The biggest predictor? AGE. Increasing the voting age or bringing in military service for everyone adult prior to voting (not ageist) would work better. But damn, they might have to stop valiantly defending the West from their keyboard for five minutes and pick up a gun.

Why be masculine when you can make a career out of talking about it?

These people brag about having multiple passports but they aren’t traitors, no!
They complain about terrorism and demand government Do Something. Well traditionally, they’d form an army out of you….
They expect a White Saviour (like Trump)… but hate on white nationalism, in white-spawned countries.

So he contents himself to crawl around waiting for approval by mimicking Vox Day (that won’t work, VD is a respected author).

They could earn some passing respect by actually looking at the damn data.

Either:-

-they don’t know how. Idiots

-they don’t care. Liars

There’s a distinct 3rd possibility.

They did, didn’t find the answer they wanted, and due to publication bias, left it in the drawer.
Again, liars.

If he sets foot on most European soil after that article, he could easily be up on human rights charges.

Satire doesn’t mean what you think it means. Calling FIRE in a theatre is still illegal. Mumbling the adult equivalent of ‘just kidding’ will make the judges angry. The male judges.

Why?

Well, he’s questioning the legal structure of foreign governments and suggesting an oppression – because oppression doesn’t exist. On incitement or sedition grounds alone, he could just disappear. That would be 100% his fault. It’s like stepping into a tiger enclosure and expecting not to get eaten. You do not bully the bigger guy, even if he seems tame. Ignorance of the ECJ law or EU law in general won’t be an excuse if the feminists (rightfully, for once) in this case, get you arrested for being a misogynist (stripping women of rights is A-grade proof in court, practically a working definition for the prosecution and he has not met the Burden of Proof for a ‘debate’ aside from hand-waving and emotional appeal, which does quite add to the misogyny thing). It cannot be simultaneously all A Joke and All A Serious Debate, depending which lawn looks safer today. Serious clowns do not exist. The fact it’s about running The West, to which he does not truly belong, means the American Free Speech shit does not apply.

Duh.

Rights belong to citizens. Citizens are loyal and dutiful and don’t oppress their peers, their legal equals. Oddly he is legally arguing that women have their citizenship rights revoked, the only way to restrict liberties, but in other materials, borders are just an idea (HBD says no). R-types always lie, even if they tell a truth it’s in bad faith to manipulate a 3rd party. It’s easy to spot by who says you’re too dumb to handle the data yourself…

It’s like he doesn’t know who Britain’s favourite person is. Nor how much power the monarchy have in Europe, let alone their common sex.
If they can murder their Muslim-breeding daughter-in-law, they can murder you.

European men don’t spend most of their free time bitching about the opposite sex, including those who live in America. We still remember the sexes need to get along for the race or species to survive. The culture clash is making even the redpill male friends of mine cringe away from these ‘losers’ explaining away their undesirability and start siding with the feminists, ‘in theory’.

He’s also clearly creeping to sex slavery of all women by revoking First World liberties aka AA with sex for ‘incel’ males (incels do not exist).

Is that the Muslim genes or the Jewish ones coming out? A harem system like Asia leads to war and over time fewer women anyway since they’re murdered post-birth. And the guys running a harem are military. And rich. Aka none of the things these bitches could be. They’re also atheists so all appeals to Muh Bible fall flat.

The misogynist-pointers at Biblical verse are actually quoting Judaism or referencing a blend of its pantheon with Eve (that is blasphemy), based on the Jewish character of Lilith. 
AKA nothing to do with Christians.

It’s as trite as the MGTOW cry of White men! Abandon your women! Never reproduce!* They want the brown ones anyway! We’ll gladly take them off your hands brother! They’re whores anyway, that’s why rape doesn’t exist!

*That’s how you can tell they’re ideologically aligned with SJWs.

Sex positive? Check.

Pro-outbreeding? Check.

Anti-family? Check.

Pro-degeneracy? Check.

Anti-natal? Check.

They really haven’t looked up Iceland, have they?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Icelandic_women’s_strike
‘The next year, “Iceland’s parliament passed a law guaranteeing equal rights for women and men.”

This was over something MINOR.

Fathers do not work as many hours as mothers, you can look it up but none of you will breed so thankfully it doesn’t matter to you. Childrearing and housekeeping are not fun, they are laborious or men would be lining up to do it and get paid.

You disrespect the valuable work women do, they strike. Which sex does the survival of the species rely on? Which sex is the primary caregiver? Which hand rocks the cradle? This is DARWIN. Kipling said ‘the female of the species is deadlier than the male’…. why do you think that is, Kemosabe?

If men are in fact superior, hypothetically…(the literal misogynist’s unscientific position to dehumanize women and strip us of agency/liberty, when they/we are merely sexually dimorphic) then logically at least most of what the feminists say must be true, since in nature the stronger dominates the weaker. This would necessitate the weaker to rightfully defend themselves. Choose your own ending, moron.

If you haven’t read the Bible, you may want to mull over why it’s women in the verse ‘Hell hath no fury…’
Consider very carefully if you wish to fuck with a strong majority of the globe, r-type scum.

It’s the Pandora’s Box of civilization. Because if the men all rally together, that obscures other topics like race, religion, age bracket, even partisanship! Convenient for self-aware r-types trying to get in with the Ks for protecting before the fighting starts (a kind of warfare cuckoldry, hiding safely behind the lines and letting the Real Men fight for you like a dusky damsel). And choosing as your opponents the one group that can’t match you in physical strength…. brave. They wouldn’t dare punch another man, but they’re happy to start on women, assuming we’ll never fight back. Yeah, they’re idyllic defenders of The West…. hiding behind other men. Usually white men. Brave and strong and independent little rebels.

Consider;

The feminists want a ‘Gender War’ – because men are going to lose.

World War G.

Men don’t even play well with one another. An all-male island would be a bloodbath. There’s no historical example of it. Sparta punished bachelors with a special tax. Roosh just wants to hide away until white men have taken white women’s rights away (temporarily) to increase his mating chances, especially if those men (superior competition) die in the process. Typical r-strategy, shout, run and hide. They have literally nothing to lose.

The r-type calls for things and asks you to do them for it.

Sorry, are you all his wife suddenly? He can’t even find one woman to agree to legally bind herself to him and his money, obviously he’s defective. He cannot run a single household and he has no child investments, he has no idea how to run a society (especially one of the outgroup, racially). Ghetto trash has more family values than Roosh V.

Let’s you and him fight – the cowardly r-type strategy of triangulation, to befriend the victor and free up resources (here, women). Let’s you and her fight – a level of scumbag that isn’t human(e). If men win, befriend men and take credit as Idea Guy for rewards (given women like goats). If women win, most men are dead, take excess supply of women – whether they want to be or not (smells like rape o’clock). You can move the rape genes to civilization but you can’t civilize rape genes.

Men, seriously. Anyone calling for a fight who isn’t willing to lead it is trying to kill you.

Western men are too soft to survive. HE KNOWS THIS.

He wants to kill your genes and your culture.

Traitor in our midst.

Eggs = expensive. Sperm = cheap. Foreva….

Finally, in fantasy land of Xenu Warrior Princes.

What happens if men ‘win’ but no woman will reproduce with them?

You die.

Idiots.

Unless you’re a happy genetic suicide like Roosh V, who can’t buy a wife with all his shekels, don’t listen to it?

He’s goading you to attack your future. This is all painfully obvious to women thanks to EQ. We know a conniving traitorous bitch when we see one. However, it’s unfair to call someone a traitor per se, when they were never one of us. Look up his background.

The persuasive case against Eurasians

The psychiatric issues cannot be denied.

OT but I’ll put it here

He wasn’t even handsome.
Seriously, all the ‘straight men’ calling him attractive need a good, long look in the mirror but that involves coming out of the closet on the other side.

He looked like a puffy sex doll, with the middle distance porn star stare. Definite creeper vibe, probable anime fetish. It’s mostly in the lips. We call that a trout pout but it’s a pretty good indicator of whorishness since it’s usually a result of Botox. He looked like a strange ambiguous anime character on a balloon or bobblehead. At least very femme for a man. He looked about 13. This case disproves a lot of supposedly redpill truisms e.g. rich guys always win, women will sleep with anything if it’s cocky enough, hypergamy is a female thing instead of a projection of male ambition, women are superficial but also don’t care about looks, you need a car and the alpha mindset (WTF NLP BS is that, alpha males IRL have children and ONE mate) and finally, mixed race is the future. I guess that’s why they have high rejection rates both on dating websites and organ donation. Evil, bigoted biology, amirite?

I still see ‘redpill men’ going on about the injustice of it.
The world doesn’t owe you sex. That’s entitlement. No IFs or BUTs. That’s entitlement. Put down the porn. They’re the male Sandra Flukes expecting the rest of us to give them orgasms…. because they exist, therefore they deserve it.

If you’re basing your lifestyle on a rapper, you’re doing Life wrong.
If your ‘bang’ (shudder) is on birth control, you shouldn’t feel proud. They aren’t ‘selecting’ you for anything. Darwin doesn’t apply to sterile sex and even IF she got pregnant, you’d be the first lot to 180 your ‘principles’ (really signals) and demand an abortion OR an exemption from child support (so Alpha, to abandon your children, so strong, not to mention cuckolding some other guy you call Beta, such brotherly love). You aren’t proving your masculinity, your Alpha-ness or anything other than your ability to be a throbbing dildo or otherwise vaginal plug while she’s between ‘boyfriends’. Where’s the victory here.

If you think hypersexuality is a positive force for society, you’re a feminist.

They would agree with that sentiment, I think. I have no illusions where these supposedly right-wing males stand. The lays never lie. Your politics is proven by your personal life.

The rest of the world won’t fetishize your child the way you fetishized their mother with some Oriental BDSM BS. Don’t expect everyone to agree with your vision or, as the feminists themselves call it, fuck your beauty standards.

If you think about it, he’s trying to emulate his parents’ relationship with his Daddy’s money, like a male Paris Hilton. I don’t know what to comment about that, let’s leave it.

If you actually read his manifesto, it doesn’t go on about women per se.

It goes on about white, blonde women.

How dare they not let him buy them? Like, we’re people? He knows what they need, like he’s their surrogate Sugar Daddy father figure. [Protip for women: if any man hints at trying to roleplay your father or a Daddy-like figure, run, he’s an r-type. Ks want an equal force in the home, they don’t actually control contrary to r-type belief, because they don’t need to, they know their woman is good.] He cares about women so much he thought we are disposable objects, not future wives and mothers capable of making our own decisions, including knowing when to reject someone who’s clearly missing a couple of screws. Consent requires a basic level of intelligence to know when and what to reject. [Also why if women can’t vote, fucking them would be pedophilia, legally. Either we have agency and can make such weighty decisions like reproduction or not. Pick ONE.]

That’s right, your mystery meat White Saviour was anti-white. Why do you want this supposed beta uprising if you’re doing so well IRL and also not beta or lower yourself? Is this not some delta revenge fantasy?

And being nice gets you nothing. That’s called the First World standard. It’s the minimum. You aren’t special for being polite to women because women are people, the same way women aren’t entitled to a drink because they smiled at a guy.

A puppy is nice.

Nobody wants to fuck a puppy.

Have the standards for husband slipped so low?

The self-aware r-types try to win women from both sides by signalling K. Run away. They’re crazy. Leave them to the cokeheads and sluts. Let the genetic suicides get on with it and burn out their pleasure circuits. Yes, that’s what burnout is.

The chart you need re votes for women

h/t VoxDay

Yeah, they’re a good idea.

The racial suffrage came in after sex didn’t it? This is why. I’ve said before, according to HBD, the sexes are more alike than the races. Here’s proof from the latest election.

Anyone trying to be edgy and saying women vote Left is only thinking of college students, who rarely vote regardless. Women historically vote with family and security. They want you to focus on sex so you’ll accept them, and they’re always a race other than white, aren’t they? Coincidence, right?

Triangulation is a form of domestic abuse. Rabble-rousers, let’s you and him fight. Divide and conquer the civilization to be barren. Sexism is that the opposite sex (nobody ever feels it about themselves) cannot be trusted. The rest is specious.
In this case, blame the female, how dare you mention race! shrieking.

Most of the time, they don’t hate women for a logical reason, but because of their religion, if you know what I mean. #youknowexactlywhatImean The rest is a rationalization about Western porn whores, as if all women are porn stars (nothing about the male ones and directors, admin companies, oddly).

Like, turn on your women, reject them sexually. [MGTOW]
We’ll be happy to take them off your hands, white man! [PUA]

Then they gloat to you that white women don’t want you anymore.
Whatever.
I’m sure that’s why they have to try so hard with stupid lines and text games, and rapes are still a frequent thing.

They think we’re all (white people) stupid to their tactics. The Middle Eastern culture in particular praises lying and deception. Look it up.