Explaining sex, marriage and problems thereof in this era

Men have sex for the pleasure, women for the ego trip.

Stay with me, it’s worth it. I’m giving away Woman Inc. trade secrets here. Don’t use them for evil.

It’s erroneously claimed women fantasise about rape. Hell no. No woman has ever done that. It’s a fear worse than death for women, just ask us. Although rape can be a cause of death in women, like the stadium girl during Katrina, who was gang-raped to death (heart attack). It isn’t that… thing, by definition, as one cannot fantasise about a thing we do not want (paradox) and we see the life outcomes on actual rape victims, as bad in adulthood as if it happened as a child. Women do not fantasise about the act or the supposed sex, then. There’s something symbolic in being wanted, taken is a visual proof. We desire to BE irresistible. Look at Aphrodite, goddess of love and pleasure but not her pleasure, that of men. Men gain pleasure (now called male gaze, it’s real) even by looking at her (imagine the howling if bikinis were banned and reconcile the popularity of porn voyeurism versus imagination) and yet the Bible condemns this as the act of lechery, further, as a crime of adultery. …Why? …. Anyone?

I expect the manosphere to rip this one off too. Fuck you guys. At least link me.

Re Venus/Aphrodite and why cults of Satan worship her/Divine Feminine and worship with orgies as their ritual (nb. any fornication counts):

She is not an object, she is a deified subject who draws pleasure to her like a whirlpool of power. She is called vain, for being honest about her allure, she loves to be irresistible. That is what women want, not men. All witches are also enchantresses of men. Men are the source of their power, even Biblical kings. Men are made weak only by desire. the Bible warns men to forswear fornication (to retain spiritual power) and avoid seductive women entirely. Sexual desire flowed to women empowers the earth and its creatures (women) as well as its ruler (Satan). Women are not servants of the devil, though, since it’s men, who are serving their energy up, gladly. They are told they need to, they have to, that it’s good for them physically and socially. Father of Lies is whom? Look at all the lust over Hollywood celebrities and porn, two faces of the same location. Films intended for minors now have sex scenes and it’s considered normal. Men are the weak point in the species because earthliness (worldliness) is not a part of their natural energy, the lure is greater. Women already have a connection to nature via her menstrual cycles. So all major Satanist figures are men. Women have no seed to sacrifice (Onan’s sin) and no energy (active) to give.

Masculine women have sex for the pleasure, effeminate men for the ego trip. This is why slutty men and women have a cultural stigma as inferior quality in personal character, or whorish (or the rake, the cad etc), women as animal (base material nature) and men as trying to prove something about themselves by ‘notch counting’, objectifying the women out of personal insecurity (weakness, from degenerating the originally pure Jesus-like soul of the man, making soul ties that bind and curse the man’s life/witch women ‘cursing’ their prey, the Witch seducing the pure boy in the Wardrobe film, objectifying effete/weak men as animals to serve their pleasure – Circe to Pinocchio). Worldliness destroys men and nothing less. In Pinocchio, they were turned into donkeys/asses, related to horses. What does the Bible, Song of Solomon for example, say about such things? Other parts about anatomy? … I’ll let you draw your own conclusions, how they were using those boys once they became worldly… what were centaurs known for? https://www.boundless.org/relationships/solomons-line-on-premarital-sex/

https://biblehub.com/ezekiel/23-20.htm

That is the modern era, where male virginity is shamed. Male purity and power over any women mocked.

Traditionally?

Meanwhile, the alpha woman is desired irresistibly (read: LOYALLY) by the alpha male, and the alpha man like a king desires only his alpha woman like a queen. His possession technically (so he has more duties) but both powerful, each body belonging to the other as the Bible decrees. Aragorn and Arwen. K-selection. Prosperous order, God’s path. Two energies made one flesh in union. The two made whole, or HOLY. Good tree producing good fruit. All myths and scriptures describe the same things.

The mistake of degenerate ancient pagans was to make the fertility goddess a man, because they liked men. Man are not fertile. Women are fertile. Mother Earth is fertile. Material things are fertile physically e.g. Lady Luck for cash gambling. The goddess of the mint, where gold coins were made. Men are immaterial, the cerebral sex. A male fertility goddess is not worshipped for his sex (or in Zeus’ case, rape) but his virility. As mentioned before ‘the embrace of a god is always fertile’. But look what happened to the Greeks and Romans, compared to the Empires of Christian societies, where the man is pure (free of sin, free of corruption, clear-THINKING) before marriage like Jesus then devoted to the family by clear cerebral choice and oath. Patriarchies are made by controlled masculine energy (self-control > self-mastery > The Masterof the house/womb) and from this, lineages are produced, great houses and legacies, by working with the woman’s inherent materalism (taming the dragon of Medusa-like rage) or I guess woman’s prima materia, her womb. The womb is an oven in alchemy, called furnace, pregnancy is a ‘bun in the oven’. The woman (womb of man) has generative power as wet (yes – lunar cycles prove it) and earthbound by the male’s seed of heat (primal fire, desire) and air (his cerebral, immaterial nature from God, Lord of the Sky/Heavens). Earth+Water+Fire+Air = Life, through the vesica pisces portal of the vulva. …I guess I also just explained the reality of alchemy. This would be referenced in weddings, right? It’s in the Bible like ‘my cup runneth over’ as material prosperity, blessed by the grace of God, especially when one is kind to women (like Jesus!) as we see in stories* but what about the words spoken? What was chosen? Why?

SO what are the vows? Let’s test this.
To husband: honour and OBEY.
To wife: love and to CHERISH.
If either party neglects these gender roles, the marriage and its union is doomed.

The man agrees to desire her and be loyal to her. What is the most common cause of divorce? Adultery. Most common cheat? Husband. Not ‘having and HOLDING’ was he? Opposite of cherishing: rejection and humiliation. Why is Medusa angry? Rejection, broadly. Rage caused by men (here rape) kills men. It all fits. Hera, also angry. Why? Only when he cheats. Again, it all fits.
The woman agrees to respect him, honour his place above her (equal yoke of protection) because that in turn protects their fruit (children) in devoted sanctity and to provide this fully, she must obey his wishes because her vantage point is material, lower -but not inferior- than his pure (before marriage, chaste, Christ-like) spiritual origin in energy terms. Woman made of rib (material) and man made of God’s ‘dust’, (air) of pure spiritual will. I AM – is God’s name, God is his Will. His Will be done. Yada yada. Aside: It’s impossible for a woman to be corrupted by the physical nor fully understand the spiritual (no female disciples). Made complementary in energies, as a couple, to produce both sexes of progeny. The success or failure of any marriage thus falls squarely on the husband’s shoulders, as it is his duty and responsibility to lead the union. The vows aren’t just words, but an oath. A commitment of the very soul of man itself. No time for careerism or time with the boys, family comes first. Prov 31, study the husband, his qualities.

And if God had a sex himself, as the creator and birther of the birthers, God would technically be a woman, by his own choice (will) of role allocation. The linguistic has caused confusion since Babel.

God concept = male if in Heavens. Creating souls.
God physically = female if on Earth, creating bodies (so sent a son as progeny, a child not conceived by the materialism of sex, spiritually pure masculinity, a lamb). If Christianity’s God has you worship a total virgin, what would Satan? Satanism tries to turn Earth into Revelation’s Whore of Babylon, stealing power from God.

So if Satan had a body, Satan would also be a woman (watch Ninth Gate). Anything materialised is feminine. Naturally, God’s place is in Heaven, ‘He’ would never materialise to become a She, so it’s purely theoretical. But the Anti-Christ would likely claim to be, and hence be female.

Looks like Amber Heard. The sheer irony. Somebody tell Johnny.

Husbands are the maintaining energy between two planes of creation, with religion.

Two planes intersecting, forming a cross….

Religion gives the cross meaning.

Don’t take my word:

“What shall I say, O my son?

What, O son of my womb?

from Prov 31, included that wording in the Bible, not really a metaphor as often claimed, it’s God speaking to you as the maker of your maker (mother, Holy ‘Father’ to, Lording over-), also Prov 31:

“Do not spend your strength on women

or your vigor on those who ruin kings.”

spend their spiritual energy materially, thereby also old slang for ejaculation
much later, we had ‘spend a penny’, to urinate – the cost of public toilets. pre-dec.

and

“The heart of her husband trusts in her,

and he lacks nothing of value.”

AND he gains
AND

A husband’s devotion to his wife is his material expression of his love of God.

It’s all right there. You don’t see epic love stories of a woman’s devotion, do you?

re holy dynamic

Many daughters have done noble things,

but you surpass them all!”

Charm is deceptive and beauty is fleeting,

but a woman who fears the LORD is to be praised.” God’s creative power being a higher thing.

Main cause of marital arguments? Money. Section of life? Career. Careerism of either party kills marriages and their sanctity but especially male careerism, it’s abandonment of the primary spiritual commitment. Now you know why the 20th century pushed it on men as desirable to abuse one’s wife and children. How so? Why the Mad Men ideal (and why make that show?)… well, neglect is a form of abuse. The children get neglected. No paternal role model, marriage has no head. A headless body flailing about. Mindless, aimless, but bodily – easily tempted and tainted by worldly things. No wits to resist, no guidance or moral authority. Household has no direction, home empties. No active, masculine energy. Employer rapes it, so Fight Club references the distinct impression that modern bosses rape their male employees of their direction, purpose and life’s energy. Wife is abandoned. Feels undesirable. Her righteous anger at this incorrectly makes him think more retreat will fix it. Man is now effete seeming, passive energy. Emasculating himself. Children sense it, act out, no moral authority will punish them effectively. Children go astray morally. Viscious cycle. Marital failure spirals. Man may leave entirely, the deadbeat or remain absent spiritually as guiding marital force. In either case, union dissolves without his steady stream of energy placed on it. Man’s energy must go somewhere, hence secretary cliche. The reason behind argument, a vow made to place energy. Woman placed in home, energy present. Void of husband? Unloved, uncherished. Nothing to give to children without personal loss (as women = passive). Feels helpless without her man, turns to spiritual intoxicants to blot out misery through the physical, her realm (alcohol, food, sex, smoking, sloth). Life outcomes of absentee parent, kids: not good. The spiritual and the material are not separate. You’re just not looking. Husband/father corrupts his wife and their union’s fruit, children, by omission – neglect and spiritual abandonment. His resentment is self-directed but acted-out in a passive way – like a woman, flees. His leading duties are neglected, so the union erodes. Like Medea, women are rageful out of revenge for being wronged. Cannot be active, becomes more passive out of spite. May be parasitic. Crazed/feared woman always made that way by men in every story e.g. bunny boiler, former mistress or wife.

It applies to a great deal of pop culture. Most people don’t see it.

ONE MORE TEST

Example? Name another cliche trope re women. Love triangle. Symbol: irresistible plus masculine, evolved competition. She gets the best mate, the one who desires her most and, here’s the purpose, would sacrifice the most for his family with her (i.e. God’s spiritual purpose of devotion and loyalty in men). So loyalty in men is praised, cowardice disgraced but there’s no female equivalent of cowardice.
If you look at Hera’s rage in myth at a body-changer admitting women enjoy sex more, that’s why fertility gods are correctly women – never heard of a man have multiple orgasms. Meanwhile, a man’s pleasure in life and with wife is in the CHILDREN, his lineage and legacy. Male depression and suicide dovetails nicely with the lowest marriage (and reproduction) rates ever. BOOM.

Blow me Peterson.

I do wonder how many male suicides have no (surviving) children. Women simply caretake pre-existing family.

*Fact: Men unkind to women suffer materially their whole lives, self-cursed by the material and their rejection of its God-designed representatives. The material is not wrong, sick or evil per se – only perceived so by the weakness of effeminate men who cannot control/influence it and thusly, feel impotent. If you get the dragon, you did something to deserve it. If Lady Luck hates you, start being a gentleman to woo her. Civilized cultures raise men as gents and the ladies arrange themselves, reflecting like the moon to their sun, the quality and calibre of their society’s men. That’s all a society is. The quality of its procreating men, the fathers and husbands. THEREFORE, EVERY SOCIETY IS A PATRIARCHY. A strong (healthy) or weak (dysfunctional) one. Their control of that role. Is it too much, too little? Is there proper energy exchange? Chivalry isn’t historic, it describes a sophisticated power dynamic of holy energies. It was a Christian series of metaphors. Only the West nailed this, for a while. Look what we achieved with it. Then we let it slip, for domineering over the feminine to ‘prove something’ (egocentric stupidity, selfish, too desperate, ultimately impotent) or degeneracy (self-weakening of men via desires rather than morally weakening women, the soft watery mirrors of solar, fiery light). Weakened men (clue: mutilated manhood, less pleasing to women in studies) prefer to push degeneracy to entice their fellow man competition into destroying themselves.

But if anyone asks, I don’t know nothing.

Hiding in plain sight

You could wave that one at a lefty protest and nobody would even notice.

Also, 13 stars.

I’m sure the owl (psychopomp) was also a coincidence?

For all the “it’s just a shape, bro!”

think like a nerd

It’s actually Rephan or Moloch, not Saturn.

A planet isn’t eating kids. Don’t be silly. That’s a false flag detail, like the Morning-star / Venus.

Buddhism is just Satanism that’s kidding itself. Worship of the Self. Sitting around navel-gazing, what a wasted life. No moral standards or dignity whatsoever.

Selfish, obsessed with seeming piety (pride) and taking money.

If you incarnated here for a reason, it wasn’t to avoid a real job, karmically.

Meditation is just demonology channeling, look it up.

It’s Satanic prayer.

Their ‘spirit guides’ are demons, masquerading as angels or dead loved ones.

The Bible said to test them but the likes of Buddhists weirdly refuse? Why do they fear Jesus’ name then? That’d be a bizarre thing for Great Aunt Mabel to fear in the spirit world.

It’s a variation of prayer (Satanists subvert instead of create) that tries to contact spirits instead of God. Guess which type.

They also tend to have weird possession symptoms after taking up the habit, over time. Studies don’t mention that stuff. It opens you up to possession over time and they latch on, legion. Drugs make it worse, what do they get sudden impulses to do? Know them by their fruit.

I am shocked. And they all see this, they all know? Wow. Just wow.

Can confirm:
http://www.angelfire.com/electronic2/kc_jones/ANTI-SRA.HTM

"The  owl  is also the symbol of  Moloch,  whom the Greeks 
   compared to  Cronos on accont of Moloch's rites using human
   sacrifice,  especially children and first-born infants.  The 
   Old  Testament makes reference to  the  Valley of Hinom  as 
   the area where  fires were lit beneath the idol or image of
   Moloch,  into which the unfortunate sacrifical victims were
   thrown.  The precise location of these sacrifices is  known
   as Topheth, which originates from the Hebrew toph,  meaning 
   'drum'--drums  were ostensibly used to cover up the screams
   of the victims."    (Toyne Newton,  "The Occult's Quest for
   World Domination", page 165)    This information is crucial
   and relevant if true, because the Molech-like ritual that's 
   performed at Bohemian Grove by the global elite uses a huge
   statue of an owl it its  ritual.   "Goodly Tyre",  which is 
   mentioned several times in the "Cremation of Care" rite was
   a center of  Goddess worship  at the time when king Soloman
   was building the great temple.]
Michael Howard, author of "The  Occult Conspiracy", asserts
   that the owl was also used by the  Summerians to  represent 
   the  great goddess, who was called Lilith, but was known to
   the Greeks later as  Hecate.

Maybe a lot of the Hollywood lot we think have no kids are just too traumatized from sacrificing them to have more.

Btw, why does FEMA have no child size coffins? What does it plan to do with the kids?

That’s a nice summary, aight imma head out:

This is interesting further reading, especially given Prince William’s famous Algol placement. He had to go and call his son Louis.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_blacknobil23.htm

Masons don’t really allow women because women are appalled by the rape of little girls and murder of babies.

Algol aka Satan’s Head. Hillary has it prominent too. aka Demon Star.

As does Trump, oddly.

Algol Star – The Blinking Demon

[So do I. Also prominent Lilith. By all accounts, I should work for Planned Parenthood.]

Owl, Eagle, Latin

https://steemit.com/conspiracy/@oendertuerk/the-owl-of-minerva-from-the-illuminati-to-the-freemasons-and-its-symbolic-meaning

http://www.masonicdictionary.com/doubleeagle.html

https://symbolsproject.eu/explore/human/hobby-/-leisure-/-affiliation-/-membership/double-headed-eagle.aspx

http://www.phoenixmasonry.org/masonic_mottoes.htm

Reading as a refresher.

https://pantheon.org/articles/m/minerva.html

It’s useful to keep up on your symbology.

Non Omnis Moriar

440Hz pop music and 666

The Tesla connection is specious but the rest is interesting.

top comment

It’s related to 666 but in a good way. 666 is not necessarily “evil.” It is a numerical code that has been hijacked by those who have the tendency to undermine God. That is why it is mentioned in the Bible in code. Check this. A simple one. Revelation 13 18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. 13 and 18. 13 is the SIXTH prime number. 18 is 6+6+6. 13×18 is 234 234 reversed is 432. 432+234=666 216 Hz is also an A tone. It’s A3. just as 108 is A2, 54 is A1 and 27 is A Prime. Notice they all add to NINE. 6 x 6 x 6 is 216. 216 is 432/2 432/3 is 144. 144 is the TWELFTH number in the Fibonacci sequence and is the only number in the sequence that is its position by placement squared equals the actual number in the sequence. 6 6 6 represents the 6 electrons, 6 protons and 6 neutrons in a CARBON 12 atom. Adam. Now, here’s how it was hijacked. GOD created the heavens and the earth now Freemason’s are trying to replace that heaven and earth with THEIR numbers and THEIR measurements WHILE mocking 666 which is just another stolen piece of sacred geometry they have corrupted to push their heliocentric monkey on a spinning ballshit model of the earth. You see it on their Moon-eye or Money. They SAY and try to make us BELIEVE with their RELIGION of GOD-vernment that…. The earth has a 23.4 degree tilt. 23.4 + 66.6 (23.4+66.6=90 degrees). 66.6 is the slope angle on the pyramid on the $1 bill. 23.4 reversed is 43.2 23.4 + 43.2=66.6 The spinning molten magical “gravity” creating “core” of the earth is supposedly 2160 miles in circumference. (even though the deepest hole ever dug in the earth was 7 miles…) The moon is supposedly 2160 miles in diameter. The sun is supposedly 432,288 miles across/ What an odd COW-Q-lation considering we have the 432 thousands and the 288 is 2×144. Also 288+144 is 432 so adding 144 miles would make their version of the sun 432,432 miles. These LYING numbers are an absolute mockery by Satanist and freemasons to undermine the sacred geometry of God. DUMB and DUMBER is just as bad as NUMB and NUMB-ER.

Oh no, it is evil. It is.

It’s the doorbell of the anti Christ.

As in, a number of events or rituals or gates to summon him.

I do wonder which basic facts they might’ve covered up. That’s what occult means, to hide.

But the swastika isn’t even a spiral…

http://runesecrets.com/rune-meanings/sowilo

If you’re gonna graffito bollocks, get it historically accurate?

You’re confusing it with celtic spirals and knots, totally different.

It’s a hvel sigil? Like a summoning portal? The cross bar?

Shapes have meanings, combinations have meta-meanings.

Me-mes, if you will.

Shit, I’m pretty sure I have books on this topic.

Hitler’s Master of the Dark Arts, Himmler’s Black Knights and the Occult Origins of the SS.

I knew it. At best, it’s a wheel since all portals were presumed to be moving, magical energy.

Like an LSD trip. Or toilet water.

Wheels had unique properties in European culture, it wasn’t just the torture kind.
Although we do have a fetish for circles.

Take it with a pinch of salt but yes, this information exists.

Reclaiming the symbols of degeneracy aka Rainbow Fascism

This was my concept because who TF doesn’t like rainbows?

I also like pink, soft fluffy things and glitter but admittedly that’s a harder sell.

Milo really made it take off though, so props.

We’re also throwing back SJ terms at objections to anything vaguely common sense. ‘Problematic’ paralyzes them with fear, they can’t deny their own terms without denial of the theories, a countersignal they’re incapable of.

This turns degenerate signals into virtue ones.

A fact most people don’t know about black magic – there are no black magic symbols. They are all perversions of the good, white and light. Similarly, there is no degenerate symbology, they must take – and the rainbow is an irrational theft for homosexuality, when the premise is that they’re all the same. However, as an acknowledgement of the ranging phenotype of white people, it is perfection.

We need a traditional aesthetic and that includes nice things.

Nobody owns those symbols, they’re defined by use. They took those symbols, we’re just taking them back. Cultural Marxism’s tricks are being used against it, all they do is appropriate good culture and pervert it for whatever pet project.

You want signalling? Fine.

We’ll change the signals.

Flower Power = Racist

http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/10/now-the-symbol-of-new-orleans-is-considered-racist/

We should do a series = Everything is Racist.

h/t: http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/now-the-fleur-de-lis-is-racist/

Symbol of French people, lilies and the Holy Trinity… according to a very detailed symbology dictionary on my shelf.

r-selection happens in free resources. Free resources condition one to ease, and produce amygdalae that are totally incapable of tolerating even the slightest imagined negativity. Finally, the incapability to tolerate even the slightest imagined negativity is the mark of an insane culture. Ergo, the r-selection of free resource availability produces insane cultures.

It’s like a reverse honour culture.
A dishonour culture.
A disrespek culture.

When looking at someone funny, or not looking at them funny, or plain not looking at them are cause for grievance.

what wtf blackadder

Notice they’re starting on symbols of aristocracy? Hm, I wonder why.

Iris as Lily as Symbol

The technical earliest version dates back to Mesopotamia, but the earliest modern form dates from the Ancient Roman-Era Gauls, where it was the lily, a traditional symbol of the protective goddess Juno, commonly depicted holding the flower.
I’m surprised neoreaction hasn’t taken up this symbol, seems apt for the cause.

Source: books in my library. I’m not writing all that down.

Flower Press

The brand on the shoulder of Milady, Countess de Winter in Alexandre Dumas’s The Three Musketeers is a fleur-de-lis. It was burned into her shoulder by the executioner of Lille when she (a nun) and a priest (the executioner’s brother) were caught stealing sacramental objects to finance their flight from their lives in the church. According to Dumas, the fleur-de-lis, the symbol of the monarchy in France, was burned into the flesh of felons to mark them for life. In Justine the Marquis de Sade also mentioned the practice of branding criminals . Apparently the crown was making the analogy to the branding of cattle; the criminal was symbolically “owned” by the monarchy as punishment for their infraction.

Dumas’s use of the fleur-de-lis was the first time the symbol was impressed on my consciousness. I was probably in my early teens when I first read The…

View original post 531 more words