Academia is becoming a viable 1% profession

What will be their excuse now?

It's so cute when r types try to be K.

It’s so cute when r types try to be K.

The coming flood of feminist films

Coming to a cinema near you.
What can we surmise?
Their stranglehold is crumbling as they realize they took on too many pets who are now devouring princess middle class white girl.

This is recruitment strategy.

Ironically, discussion of these films will enable discussions of the myths and lies they perpetrate – a counter-recruitment strategy in all but name for the wider internet. They won’t work to recruit as planned by the Hollywood propaganda machine and will suffer the same fate as other politik-heavy flicks, consigned to the dustbin of history for their errors and blatant yanking of the heartstrings. Those types of film are notoriously unsuccessful with normal audiences (they sense the bullshit creeping down their throats and refuse to chug).

It may be taken as a bad sign on first sight but it begs the question: why do they need to put it out now?
Their neoliberal comrades need something to cling to for emotional sustenance while times get increasingly tough, as predicted.

 

Sit back and enjoy watching as they cling to fictions while reality crashes down around their ears.

Sit back and enjoy watching as they cling to fictions while reality crashes down around their ears.

No one cares what your credit score is

That should include yourself, for the most part.
Your credit score only matters if you want to borrow more than you can save. If you want to borrow more than you can save, your credit score will be shit because you cannot handle money and shouldn’t be trusted with it.
Credit scores are fast becoming a status symbol.
Pause for a moment to consider how nonsensical that is.

You are not exempt from call time. Pay attention.

If you need credit, the score will be too poor to get it. If you don’t need credit, your wealth is the status symbol and your score is irrelevant. Yes, it’s unfair. It’s also known as Business.
Credit scores are like a video game now – people look for ways to get one higher than the neighbours. Who cares what your fucking neighbours do? Do they control your life? Couldn’t you better spend your time? The time you make others pay for? Value yourself! Few people factor in their wage when considering what they spend their time on. i.e. Would it be more cost-effective to pay someone else to do your laundry? As in, less than the time away from work making money? A little rationality goes a long way, people.
This is a sign of The Decline.

Think of it like a gameshow where anyone too stupid to wise up to redpill will die a financial death and it becomes tolerable.

Think of it like a gameshow where anyone too stupid to wise up to redpill will die a financial death and it becomes tolerable.

When the illusion of money (hell, not even the illusion, it’s a shape from a computer bit) outweighs the social value of actual money and tangible goods, things are going wrong in a big way. People have inverted priorities and people (plural) control the markets. Herd mentality, to be precise/pedantic.
Credit scores are only useful if you need a loan on a short-term basis e.g. start-up capital. Long term is probably a con, or why else loan it? These people run a business and you are their living, breathing profit generators. Keep ignoring that interest rate, usury thrives on ignorance. When they come to take your games console maybe you’ll jolt yourself awake and start to give a shit what happens in the real world.

The Memo Millennials have missed

Snape was a role model in some ways

This is what happens when you raise children on (everyone gets a) Gold Star permissive parenting schemes.

Little Emperor Syndrome. You cannot get everything you want.
They lust but do not love. They want but do not need. They want their fair share, which happens to be more than their friends. They take without giving. They want data without perspective. The Just World (fallacy) is attainable. I stand for equality, same treatment and outcomes is fair. Government can solve all our problems, like parents, the money never runs out. Who needs to think about the future, carpe diem. Drugs aren’t harmful ‘cos they’re natural but medication is ‘cos Big Pharma is bad unless it legalises my high. The world is my entertainment and I can send death threats to the creators because they owe me for indulging them. Credit is like free money, right? Sleeping around is consequence free, STDs have treatments dude. I can make a $100k living with my postgrad in Medieval Madrigals.

What’s the ideology of the parental generation? Oh yes, hippies.
We have adults with the minds of spoilt brats and we should be wary of the tantrum when reality sets in and they discover Bank Mummy spent the inheritance on a series of sex cruises with toyboy Rodrigo.

We’re Different – But the Same.

Online activism irritants are the scourge of the internet. A little-known selfie trend has unusual implications for Affirmative Action. The best two Universities in GB are Oxford and Cambridge aka Oxbridge aka Camford. They were among the first Universities in the world and seldom place low in global ranking. “I, too, am Oxford” was a selfie trend by attention-whoring minorities holding up whiteboards with trivial ‘microaggression’ complaints when they’re at the best institution for learning possible. Yeah, spoilt much?
Refreshingly predictable, the feminists didn’t like competition and began “We are all Oxford”, here’s the tumblr (yes tumblr again) http://wearealloxford.tumblr.com/
We are ALL Oxford – yeah, why would they complain, they all got in. It is entirely feasible they might have failed to, were it not for the diversity targets set by the British government. Why? To look good for the European Union, who set diversity targets to shut the feminazis up.
One boy’s sign in particular struck me: “Your brain not your background open Oxford’s doors” – Err, no, Flying Spaghetti Monster haired bro.
You need to pay to even apply (I almost applied but decided against for these reasons, I know the system) and then there’s prep for their admissions tests you need a privileged upbringing to pass (posh word test), transport, marking, face-to-face interviews because looks don’t matter, early application (poor schools miss the deadline by default) and compulsory emphasis on extra-curricular requiring your parents have surplus funds e.g. taking time to do charity work for free, travel the world and throw some inspiring anecdote to dazzle interviewers, start a company to help inexplicably starving women with gold earrings and freshly ironed clothes in Africa.
How the hell did he get in? ~ a question everyone who’s been to University has asked multiple times in our heads while present. Post-hoc delusion? Probable. Brains are the standard for Higher Education. The entire level, assuming we’re following the narrow convention of rote memorization over flexible useful knowledge but it’s Oxford, of course we are. Still, thick-skulled aspirants and even the genius poor need not apply. Them’s the breaks. Oxford has targets and they are paid by the Government to meet them. If the money dried up, most of those applicants would be out of the ivory towers in the cold like the rest of England.
When do the targets stop? When will the factors beyond control (birthplace, melanin level, sob story) be left to the TV singing competitions where they belong? Certainly no society claiming to be meritocratic could support these policies. If they’re good enough, they’ll get in or it’s our loss, right? I have asked around including some rather high-up feminists. They say never, never will these policies cease and call enough, we’re done! Disturbingly, they have zero problem with this (while their own White middle class are a majority, allowing them a high horse for Little Princess, but demo changes are a sweet irony of power structures). While you take into factor these pointless, culturally-coddled details, it is discrimination against unprotected classes. There isn’t positive discrimination, it’s an oxymoron. If your biggest problem in life is a microaggression, you are too sensitive to survive in any cut-throat academic environment and have no real problems. Let’s be pragmatic about this: Doesn’t a white majority country logically necessitate a white majority populace in its own academia? Or is that national majority up for changing, too? Shall you push them down to the poor quality Universities or do the clever but poor or statistically ousted natives (not oppressed enough – snark) not deserve their cultural legacy and biological heritage? The one their kin and forefathers built and earned credibility for? It’s bad enough when Beyoncé appropriates Nordic European culture to push her tacky show. There are no definitive answers given from the Utopic Unrealists on these questions. Didn’t Camus say Utopia is that which is in contradiction with reality“? [Yes. And it was beautiful.] They have no responsibility for the results and no personal stake, no one should take them seriously, it’s their saviour complex dream and they squeeze people into their narrative.
The cure? Involve them and see how fast they change their tune, “But my family’s always gone to Oxford!”, yeah well now you’re disinherited, don’t let the big doors your ancestors carved crush your body and your dreams on the way out.
Feminists will never stick up for (support) the poor, they look down upon the working poor as inferiors and simultaneously immoral for being common (yes, that level of classism). Coincidentally, I have never met a working class feminist, everyone from that class I’ve asked turned the air blue (swore profusely) at the “accusation”. Bravo.
They’ll only begin to see their error when they personally suffer and the demography of their bubble changes completely, by then it’s too late. At present, it is the poor and genuinely creative who suffer for the follies of the deranged. Why else do you think so many entrepreneurs forgo Higher Ed? It doesn’t want them while the targets are juicy veins of taxpayer money, funding the betterment of non-taxpayers. Admitting targets and limits and standards involve unhooking their claws from Political Power and believe me, they are drunk on the stuff as the students they brainwash with “The Real World is Evil” ~ from people too scared to enter it.
I can see why the accepted students fall for the ruse, the experimental group is wholly biased. Wouldn’t it feel extra-special to say “We accept you for what you’ve had no hand in earning but we actually love you for all you earnt! Including us! £££! Everybody wins!” Janusian tactics when we have no control group to compare results with. What do they do with their precious raw results? Grade inflate, extensively. The diverse student body is so naturally talented, they need their degrees puffed up as their egos in a sad bid for alumni funding.