Reject the self-abnegating Marxism of mindful/mindless ‘meditation’

Skip to end for studies.

So-called meditation is a religious practice, a form of prayer. It is communication with spiritual entities beyond one’s body. It has no place in schools. Schools want to impose it because it forms a kind of repression in the developing brain, it is cliche Victorian emotional repression (the stiff upper lip). I happen to think the state and agents of the state should have no ‘right’ to call a citizen’s emotions invalid or wrong. Children are not hysterics to be corrected into quiet submission. These mindful or mindless devotionals are used to control children, by adults, a great evil. The meditation as they would practise it is pagan in origin and cannot be made secular. One’s Higher Self is godly, the Creator. It is the thing we rejoin once we die. Clearly, this is horrendously inappropriate to ‘teach’ children in a school setting, under the guise of keeping them quiet (stiff upper lip) and teaching ‘focus’. All prayer teaches focus by repetition of words or concepts with the express purpose of drowning out personal emotion. Schools should not be emptying the minds of the students. It is a toxic concept, and you can point to all the scientism studies you like and it won’t change the fact children should not be lectured on their very thought process and censored therein, by the State! This is how docile populaces are made, and the brain changes are permanent. We call this clipping of their wings brain damage, if we’re being more accurate. There is nothing inherently wrong with their natural, evolving brain development! Being a healthy, developing child is not a sin and should not be condemned with appropriated, shallow religious practices.

https://psychology.wikia.org/wiki/Emotional_development

Piaget said kids cannot understand the abstract before the teens, the brain is too immature. THAT’s why they want to get at the kids before then!

This is why Marxists want access to primary school kids.

https://www.verywellmind.com/formal-operational-stage-of-cognitive-development-2795459

Piaget believed that what he referred to as “hypothetical-deductive reasoning” was essential at this stage of intellectual development. At this point, teens become capable of thinking about abstract and hypothetical ideas. 

Capable! Prior to this, critical rejection is impossible.

But religious material is taught as RE, prior to this…..

The State cannot preach contentment and faith in devotional practices like a church. It is curious that such a ‘process’ does not work without faith and this failure would present in older children more often, so the schools push the prayer earlier. In the same way children are not physically capable of performing all the same activities, it is a violation of human rights to foist any censorship onto their emotional mind. The right to feel is human and sacrosanct, legally. Blotting out ‘undesirable’ emotions by the state agents, like anger, is cruel and unusual punishment. Not to mention, impossible. The military doesn’t go so far as to call possibly righteous emotions like anger ‘wrong’. A negative emotion is not innately ‘bad’ or wrong. If the teachers have failed to earn the respect (and obedience) of the students, however many drugs are pushed into that population, then perhaps the fault is with the adults and not the children? If we look at the league tables and life outcomes, a child’s disrespect of their teachers (and ‘misbehaviour’, aka questioning authority) is entirely valid.

“brain training” – it’s brainwashing

It’s creepy to watch those kids do qi or psi practices (those hand gestures) and think this is scientific.

Pushing Buddhism, they literally have a guy right there.

“their brains are being reshaped” – by the State
They’re encouraging ego death in white kids. See the fleeting reference to privilege, later? It forces a kind of depersonalization and derealization. Let me guess, this only ‘needs’ to be done on white kids in white schools?

If it were scientific, it’d work 100% of the time. This is based on faith.
When you drink water, you’re hydrated. There’s cause. With this, the ‘stress’ placebo only works if you believe it will. Slow breathing will literally do the same thing, but they want an empty mind.

Marcus Aurelius taught about ‘controlling the mind’ too but he was white and didn’t promote ego death for Cultural Marxism, so you won’t hear about it.

“delusions such as anger or attachment”
ATTACHMENT.
Like to your family, country, attachment!

“ignorance, jealousy, so when the mind is out of control”
They’re gaslighting children as hysterics.

Lobotomies have such a bad rep.

“They can’t control what they say or what they do”
I think they can they’re human beings, this is dehumanisation.
Worshipping Buddha, a man, is idolatry. It isn’t actually a religion, there is no God.

“everything we do relates to our intention”
the road to Hell
actually the West judges by character and behaviour
I’m sure there are some really nice, lonely pedophiles, they’re still evil.

“be mindful of the correct things”
WHAT correct things?
oh DO tell us!

(he does not)

“everyone needs to meditate” – some weeb larper

“clarity and peace within our mind” – you mean around authorities like school?
We had those things in the West for millennia.

“overcome anger completely”
need I point out how evil that is?
making them like sitting ducks
emotion has evolutionary purpose, Darwin wrote a whole BOOK on it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Expression_of_the_Emotions_in_Man_and_Animals
Cultural Marxism pushes formless identity and state-censored emotion.

Prof Charlton’s Thought Prison went into this.

http://thoughtprison-pc.blogspot.co.uk/

Why don’t you convert to political correctness?

Since you can’t do anything about political correctness, why not just make the best of it?

Why not exploit the situation instead of moaning about it?

Do what is expedient – why not?

*

Why not make a successful career out of PC – like so many others?

Why not surrender your private mind to PC, in the same way as you have already surrendered your public behaviour?

By having any reservations at all, you are making yourself miserable – why not simply cast-aside those reservations?

Just say an inner yes to what you will, anyway, be forced to do…

*

Since you necessarily inhabit the thought prison that is political correctness – then why not, at least, become one of the ‘trustys’ among the inmates – to assist with the smooth running of the gaol, and get yourself a few privileges.

Why not, indeed, strive to become one of the guards? Somebody has to do the job? Maybe you could temper the severity of the regime?

And herein lies the particular temptation for the intellectual elite – a temptation few resist.

That (literally) soul-destroying pragmatism by which (for eminently sensible reasons) we quietly, by gradual degrees, change sides in the spiritual battle of the world: that unseen warfare between The Good and that which opposes The Good.

*

Well why not?

There is no earthly reason why not.

In a world of pervasive and powerful PC, there is really only one compelling reason for holding back and resisting in any way, shape or form – which is that embracing political correctness will shrink your soul.

*

If you do not believe in the soul, this reason will carry no force at all: so by your own calculations you are stupid to resist PC.

the reprobate mind

Or, if you believe the soul is inviolable, and that nothing you think or do can affect the soul: then also, by your own calculations, you are stupid to resist PC.

If you do not believe in Natural Law (innate knowledge of The Good), and that breaking Natural Law harms the soul: then logically you should learn to love PC.

*

If you do not believe in the reality of transcendental good – then you might as well go with the flow, allow yourself to be re-programmed: to learn, by regular practice, to re-label lies as truth, ugliness as beauty, evil as virtue; until PC has entered into your heart and soul, as well as pouring into your ears and out-from your mouth.

*

But political correctness is nihilism; therefore it is not merely political: it is also existential. 

To fight against political correctness is therefore ultimately an existential act: a battle to preserve the eternal soul.

*

But if you do not believe that political correctness will harm your eternal soul: then you would be well-advised to suck it up.

Why not?…

BBC scum:

“as a scientist, categorically”
no?

Mengele was a scientist, wouldn’t trust him with kids. Scientists are not a superior race, free of motive and emotionality.

The nose in the air is creepy.

It’s a placebo action, there is no actual control because the kids know when they’re doing it.

Controlled breathing would be a control. But they won’t do that- no effect!

“the stories that we tell about ourselves, about other people, aren’t necessarily true”
paging Scientology
How is this the business of the State?
How is self-image and identity their concern?

and “about other people” – such AS?
“so we can enquire into that”
violation of human rights, right to privacy
this is experimentation violating the Nuremberg Code
Can the State psychoanalyze you? Where is the consent?

“a healthy skepticism about our thought process”
well calling it healthy makes it healthy
pass the deep-fried Mars bar
this is science

can I be skeptical of your skepticism?

if it’s real, why can’t I question it?

If you guessed I was the one replying, you’d be right. Also measurement error.

the ‘get em young’ thing is a huge red flag

they go from showing teens, discussing teens to…
“8 and 9 year-olds”

and the Buddhist guy wants to be left alone around them, in a hypnotic state.

 

I had a feeling about this…

Can Mindfulness Help Reduce Racism?

Can we override hidden prejudice? A new study says, yes, it can be done—and the key might be mindfulness meditation.

https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/can_mindfulness_help_reduce_racism

I fucking knew it.

Every. Single. Time.

Biases are only okay if brown people have them about white people, you see.

Now, a newly published study by researchers Adam Lueke and Brian Gibson of Central Michigan University suggests another way to impact implicit assumptionsmindfulness.

http://spp.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/11/24/1948550614559651.abstract

In their study, 72 white college students were measured on their levels of implicit bias of blacks and the elderly using the IAT.

Was it a KKK convention? How else to only include white kids? What are the odds?

Another anti-white methodology, ignore the coincidence.

Some participants then listened to a 10-minute mindfulness meditation in which they were instructed to “become aware of bodily sensations (heartbeat and breath) and fully accept these sensations and any thoughts without restriction, resistance, or judgment”;

That’s one way pedos groom kids. So it’s beyond just steady breathing, you see. It’s self-hypnosis.

They don’t assign it as homework because then they couldn’t implant various notions while the kid is suggestible.

other participants listened to a recording about natural history, voiced by the same narrator.

Why not steady breathing? That isn’t a real control.

Afterwards, the two groups of students were evaluated on their levels of mindfulness and then reassessed on their levels of implicit bias using the IAT.

IAT is BS.

Results showed that people who listened to the 10-minute mindfulness recording demonstrated less implicit bias against blacks and old people on the race and age IATs than individuals who listened to the other 10-minute recording. In other words, the mindfulness intervention decreased students’ automatic biases against blacks and older adults.

The mind is numb, they’d be less likely to associate rabbits with carrots, too! It retards the thought process.

Why no politically neutral controls? Dogs > bones? Cats > burgers?

For example, mindfulness training has been shown to help overeaters decrease the automatic attractiveness of fatty foods, allowing them to resist eating those foods when the foods are presented to them.

It literally over-rides survival, yeah.

This is like the hen-chalk thing with people, it suppresses nervous function (fear appraisal). A fox could walk right in front of them and they wouldn’t move. Non-response is not good.

They’re doing this to your kids.

One interesting consideration is that in the present study the mindfulness training was very brief and non-specific—in other words, the authors did not specifically try to train the participants in bias-reduction.

Retardation, same thing. Stop noticing studies.

With no warning of the true purpose, the subject cannot resist – just like that chicken.

This leads the authors to suggest that brief mindfulness training may be a good substitute for—or may augment—more traditional anti-bias training. 

Brainwashing!

https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_mindfulness_can_defeat_racial_bias

Even if we try to act adopt a colorblind view in the world, it doesn’t work because our brains don’t actually work that way.

They know what they’re doing.

In my own work, I identify, develop and examine the efficacy of a set of practices that intentionally link inner and outer work to raise awareness about race and racial experience in our lives, with a focus on personal, interpersonal, and systemic or structural levels. 

The resulting “ColorInsight Practices ” combine mindfulness-based practices with teaching and learning about race and color to increase awareness of how race and color impact us all, and give rise to insight and greater understanding. They pave the way to new experiences that help us loosen our attachments to narratives and other forms of suffering that give rise to biases along the way…..

Attachments are GOOD, a human RIGHT.

The Nazis wanted to end suffering, if we’re going in that direction.

Why is nobody talking about this? Controlled ops. Plenty of proof.

A Conversation on Mindfulness, Bias and Racial Justice


https://www.takingcharge.csh.umn.edu/mindfulness-racial-justice

When Mindfulness and Racism Intersect


https://www.huffpost.com/entry/mindfulness-race_n_7310156

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3862075/
Discrimination hurts, but mindfulness may help: Trait mindfulness moderates the relationship between perceived discrimination and depressive symptoms
Discriminatory experiences are not only momentarily distressing, but can also increase risk for lasting physical and psychological problems. Specifically, significantly higher rates of depression and depressive symptoms are reported among people who are frequently the target of prejudice. Given the gravity of this problem, this research focuses on an individual difference, trait mindfulness, as a protective factor in the association between discrimination and depressive symptoms. In a community sample of 605 individuals, trait mindfulness dampens the relationship between perceived discrimination and depressive symptoms. Additionally, mindfulness provides benefits above and beyond those of positive emotions. Trait mindfulness may thus operate as a protective individual difference for targets of discrimination.

Discrimination is critical thought, it’s vital for cognition.

Click to access 570baaf508aee06603519a68.pdf


Brief Mindfulness Meditation Reduces Discrimination.
Recent research has demonstrated that mindfulness meditation reduces implicit race and age bias by weakening the associations of the target group with negative constructs. The current research examined the potential for mindfulness to also affect discriminatory behavior. Participants listened to either a 10-min mindfulness audio or a control audio before playing a game in which they interacted with partners of different races in a simulation and decided how much they trusted them with their money. Results indicated that the mindfulness condition exhibited significantly less discrimination in the Trust Game than did either of the 2 control conditions. The implications and importance of mindfulness meditation in alleviating bias are discussed.

As thought control, it’s more effective than regular placebo!

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/11/151110171600.htm

Because it’s more involved placebo.

https://www.quora.com/Does-meditation-really-help-or-is-just-a-placebo?share=1

Transcendental meditation, mindfulness, and longevity: an experimental study with the elderly.

Abstract

Can direct change in state of consciousness through specific mental techniques extend human life and reverse age-related declines? To address this question, 73 residents of 8 homes for the elderly (mean age = 81 years) were randomly assigned among no treatment and 3 treatments highly similar in external structure and expectations: the Transcendental Meditation (TM) program, mindfulness training (MF) in active distinction making, or a relaxation (low mindfulness) program. A planned comparison indicated that the “restful alert” TM group improved most, followed by MF, in contrast to relaxation and no-treatment groups, on paired associate learning; 2 measures of cognitive flexibility; mental health; systolic blood pressure; and ratings of behavioral flexibility, aging, and treatment efficacy. The MF group improved most, followed by TM, on perceived control and word fluency. After 3 years, survival rate was 100% for TM and 87.5% for MF in contrast to lower rates for other groups.

Notice that this is one of only a handful of meditation studies that carefully tries to control for expectation — the placebo effect — so it is a more robust study-design than most people are used to seeing and the findings should therefore be that much more reliable.

I cannot find a straight placebo study.

Almost like they’re the same, at differing intensity.

Why not do a study with a control that just counts their breath to 100 again and again?

When we walk slower in parks, our breathing unconsciously adjusts down to our walking pace, it isn’t woo woo magical thinking bullshit.

In a pre-industrial West, we had no problem relaxing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_trust_and_low_trust_societies

Why would the Marxists push this now?

decrease ‘stress’, an evolved response to dangerous conditions?

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0208490

An association between multiculturalism and psychological distress

Amidst increasing focus on rising rates of substance abuse and suicide among white Americans and extending prior research on intergroup attitudes and health, this study examines a novel factor associated with psychological distress: disagreement with multiculturalism. Using the Portraits of American Life Study (N = 2,292), logistic regressions indicate that for Whites and Hispanics, increased likelihood of psychological distress (depression, hopelessness and worthlessness) is associated with stronger disagreement with multiculturalism, measured as “If we want to create a society where people get along, we must recognize that each ethnic group has the right to maintain its own unique traditions.” For Blacks, however, attitudes toward multiculturalism are not associated with psychological distress. Future research might determine if these results can be replicated, and if so, identify the causal mechanism(s) at work

 

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/menticide

the systematic effort to undermine and destroy a person’s values and beliefs, as by the use of prolonged interrogation, drugs, torture, etc., and to induce radically different ideas.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/menticide

Medical definition of menticide: a systematic and intentional undermining of a person’s conscious mind : brainwashing.

systemic – check

intentional – check

undermining – check

of the MIND – check

It’s thought police censorship, a violation of human development.

https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/abs/10.1176/ajp.107.8.594?journalCode=ajp&

Really it should be mentacide but that’s just English.*

That’s what my books say. I guess either works.

The concept of “menticide” indicates an organized system of judicial perversion and psychological intervention, in which a powerful tyrant transfers his own thoughts and words into the minds and mouths of the victims he plans to destroy or to use for his own propaganda. Modern psychiatry may deliver him several tools for this perversion. Our psychiatric standpoint toward this challenge has to be formulated. Examples of menticide are described and ways of protection indicated.

Reference Meerlo 1956 The rape of the mind

Denounce the wrongthink!

This is what happens when you give teachers priestly powers over kids. They have no moral authority or real world ability. Suddenly everyone is ‘telling’ on everyone else.

Close to ethnic cleansing is ideological cleansing first.

The heretics! Blasphemers!

Monster mobbing is condoned by the Party, in fact, compulsory!

Thought Prison really didn’t go far enough, did it?

They must be desperate to pull up anyone and everyone.

If you look at the witch trial stuff – if you didn’t finger someone, you’d be suspect. If they sink or swim, they’re suspect. An impossible game to keep everyone busy while those in power snuff out imaginary challengers.

Why imaginary?

Well, you don’t change things by taking the other guy’s job.

You replace the whole structure. Then they fall from the foundation, having lost the loyalty of the bottom of the pyramid (working class) who actually keep it altogether, it’s inevitable and that’s causing desperation.

They’re stopping people from thinking with a clear head and building a competing structure… since that would work better.

Communism is the futile attempt to convince honeybees to stop building hives for themselves.

It’s like ideological whack a mole. I’ve kept out of it, obvious red herring.

If they don’t slap down ALL challenges, real or imaginary, their failure will happen sooner.

They rely on your engagement.

Leeches need a blood supply.

Solution: Enforce defamation.

Words have meanings, reckless aspersions is also defamation, look it up.

If you’re calling someone a Nazi, they’d better actually be one or give just cause to make a reasonable person think so (not sarcasm). You can’t just claim it and pretend your feelings make it real, these people claim telepathy beyond the subject themselves (which is actually gaslighting) e.g. he says he isn’t but he must be because (reasoning Sherlock Holmes would slap them for). The rationalizations are poison. Also seen this from fake conservatives e.g. the faux scare about man-hating because right-wingers hate deadbeats.

You can dislike someone without thinking they’re Hitler. Keep your non sequiturs well away from me.

It’s a distraction to cease holding the left ACCOUNTABLE for its decades of FAILED predictions.

Do not forget.

When you see a leftist, laugh at them. Years of cold temperatures and they’re still panicking over waterworld. Years of immigration and they’re complaining about the economy, high rents and crime. Years of inviting parasites and they’re crying how they will never retire or have kids but their taxes funded 16 imports down their street. LAUGH.

These multicultural missionaries expect to be taken seriously. They’re useful idiots. They sell the ideological equivalent of Beanie Babies in the current year. If they miss out on a promotion, tell them an immigrant deserves to take their job. With glee!

Remind them of their own ideas and that now we feel the consequences.

Let the nonsense pass and keep focus where it should be, on the Left’s predictions.

Especially mentioning the classism of the modern left and class treason of their promises makes them screech like a witch burning at the stake. Labour is full of class traitors, the betrayal is valid. That is all we need know. The Left want a discussion. Do not give them one.

Starve the attention whores.

Best comment:

The Left need to remember that Citizen Robespierre fell to Madame Guillotine.

Please report to your local denunciation station for having a sense of humour.

All you activist lot aren’t even trolling the left properly.

You don’t post overt stuff, you hint and let them go batshit. Much more fun.

Like, post gardening stuff and say you’re preparing for global cooling. #cycle24

If it won’t happen, why do they care? Lazy people hate action, it leaves them behind. Make them feel out of touch, since they are. Being upbeat and active kills them.

Blithely, when they try to concern troll about the economy “at least if there’s another recession the immigrants will go back home”.

No culture allowed

No traditionalism, nothing

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-47613578

At least they have a home to move back to.

and it’s obvious there’s no such thing as “British values”

it’s a big black hole where cultures go to die

There is only English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish values.

there isn’t even “British”, the Empire is long dead

the Equality Act violates natural freedoms, humans are not equal, equalism is biological myth but we have freedoms FROM…

like not having your child sexually groomed in brothel techniques by outsiders?

how is that compulsory? how can the children possibly consent?

(that’s the trick to eventually abolish age of consent, the focus on “pleasure”, a child’s sexual pleasure

“Sex Ed” should be simple reproductive biology, schools cannot moralise)

why do we taxpayers still fund religious schools and RE anyway?

The taxpayer is paying for religious indoctrination.

Why isn’t RE a Uni-level subject? It’s too complex for children and they do not consent.

It’s just a specific, superstitious branch of history anyway.

Even actors are starting to realise they’re in a prison.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/video_and_audio/must_see/47592129/ralph-fiennes-i-d-like-to-see-a-black-actor-in-a-bond-like-persona

The book Thought Prison was truly ahead of its time.

Everyone is stifled.

Think what this suggests:

“You can only express yourself within legal limits, and the omission of certain expressions is also illegal.”

Thought police.

They want children before they’re physically capable of abstract reasoning – and rebellion.

Logically, they could outsource all RE (it’s history) and all Sex Ed – to MOOCs.

Why do they want to spend huge amounts of money repeating themselves to children in person?

China “hurt feelings” again

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-04/angry-tesla-owners-protest-companys-aggressive-price-cuts

They know we don’t give a shit, right?

It does show you a tactic of theirs.
(They’ve also been ‘protesting’ property developers, actually intimidation).

Thought police get the citizens to report one another.

This saves them time, resources, and allows them to move the goalposts on offences with cases.

Collectivism cultures manage this especially well with envy.

The SJWs “hurt feelings” = violence rhetoric is basically 100% chink.
They treat ‘shame’ like something humans shouldn’t have to feel.

You bought an over-priced car, you should feel shame. It was your choice.

Tie scarves on them and the communists who trashed developer offices would be anti-fa.

Most Asians are quite tough people. You wouldn’t see that shit in Korea, N/S.

Chinacoms are the weakest cucks to their government on the planet.

China has “hurt feelings” every week. It’s an abuse tactic, they’re trying to make you prioritise their feelings over yours (gaslighting) and infantilise them so they cannot be held responsible for their adult actions (like buying a shitty car). You can’t negotiate with that cultural tantrum unless you’re absolutely brutal, they vote in Big Gov because they need it to keep their infantile population in line. If you give in one time, they reference it like a shrew every time thereafter. Those are not respectable people.

They’re killing Christians now, it’s obvious. Plenty of their own citizens have disappeared but there’s a protest about this – distraction.

They’re trying to enforce speech laws from China in the West, if you look back to the Guardian article about Western Unis not using the word “Taiwan”.

This is the enemy.

To learn who rules over you……

Twitter’s psychosis experiment

Big Brother is only going to ask you ONCE:

Which is the straight line?

This is why we should’ve kept the old asylums open.

https://www.simplypsychology.org/asch-conformity.html

“Asch (1951) devised what is now regarded as a classic experiment in social psychology, whereby there was an obvious answer to a line judgment task. If the participant gave an incorrect answer it would be clear that this was due to group pressure.”

Do you believe in genetics, the evolution of sexual dimorphism or equalism and conformity?

Future cult researchers will have a field day with this attempted breach of reality.

Thought Prison was right. This won’t end.

Breaking a person isn’t a big thing requiring waterboarding and chains.

It’s very subtle and small. You force them to publicly lie to themselves, to say something they know isn’t true and believe it. This miniature psychosis causes future dissonance, they’ll go on to deny things before their very eyes without intervention.

If you can get them to lie ONCE, just once, they’re yours forever.

SJWs aren’t to be mocked as stupid or pitied, they’re psyops.

https://www.simplypsychology.org/minority-influence.html

They dress like useless idiots so you under-estimate them.
If they turned up in suits, you’d know it was a conformity test.

The freak police

They won’t investigate home invasion, illegals, rape or murder.

But you like a tweet…

http://thoughtprison-pc.blogspot.com/

Is anybody safe?

Under PC, whatever you do, whatever willing you show, status is contingent.

There is no safety even for members of the ruling elite in a system of Political Correctness; anyone at all is susceptible to denunciation for any reason or no reason at any time.

Since PC is a wave of moral ‘progress’ which leaves-behind all previous moral standards and behaviours – there can be no accumulation of moral capital.

This applies to the ultra-PC just as much as to the openly reactionary.

(When they ask where their pension is, laugh).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoughtcrime

Tolerant left wants to censor private conversations

The Left always become tyrannical oppressors over time, who end up mass slaughtering the people who won’t tolerate it. Lefty bigots.

Trump, when is he banning companies from getting involved in politics?

This is anti-democratic.

I told you not to talk to them. They have nobody to attack any more, nothing to fight – this makes them impotent. If you don’t cut the head off the Hydra, it can’t grow more! Avoid the control freaks (isolate them like they want – safe space?) or they will get you arrested. You can’t fix the stupid. And you’re making them stronger with your eyeballs on their twitter etc. They feed from attention and they’re starving.

She wants to ban jokes.
Seriously. Why not make it the Meme Banning Bill?

State sponsored sense of humour! When do we get a list of requirements!

Vice police of the mind!

This is anti-safe space, does tumblr know?

All the fandoms that would die?

Most fandoms are millions of people in groups online.

Hey, they arrested people for making public opinions known so people hid in DM and PMs and the like, how is this surprising? But how will they ban any forum? (members 500+)

YOU CAN’T KILL AN IDEA, LABOURITE.

They want to break up large groups so they can pick off each group and the others aren’t warned about this or tactics in good time to respond. A group of minds is essentially a supercomputer and trained on political info (e.g. Q) can uncover many things.

The sluts have the most to fear from this, because if they ban private conversations, all your flirting online will have to be public. All the girls will see all the tactics you try on the others.

This ruins freedom of association, including intimate (emotionally intimate) conversations. They’re trying to call everyone else a cult… the New Church Ladies.

It isn’t about women, that’s a straw man. They don’t like being questioned, especially journalists, anyone with bias. There shouldn’t be “protected groups”, we must be equal under the law? They’re allowed to judge us, we aren’t allowed to judge them (r-types fear The Mob).

She should fuck off and take her menopause meds instead of taking it out on us that she isn’t getting enough follows on twitter. Yeah, you can’t force people to like your message, Mz Hitler! All their signals are turning against them, because their mask is slipping….

And by banning all others rhetoric, that’s what they’re trying to do, they think they can force people back asleep.

She could start a blog but people have to be dedicated to read those and you can’t really shame people for seeking out ideas, a liberal principle. It’s freedom of speech. One reason I don’t advertise or shill. I’m not harming a fly over here so…. where’s the grounds?

Logically, she’d have to ban large social gatherings, including pubs. In London, the largest social gatherings happen in mosques….. so…. nothing will happen. Khan won’t let it.

She’s carping about online harassment, when that’s an SJW-pushed thing. Well, wouldn’t this then apply to all the SJWs who go around monstering random, normal people? Trying to ruin their lives? One rule for plebs, is it?

And you wondered why nobody wanted to vote for “I’ll make upsetting Muslims illegal!” Miliband? We know that ends in a very literal test of the phrase “sticks and stones…” or a gay club shooting. Let them all have their bloody diversity, don’t lift a finger.

She implicitly admitted she starts arguments with people then gets all triggered when they argue back? Like people? Maybe don’t get angry at everything?

You can’t win without having the debate first, you dumb cow.

You people have been politically retarded since the Blair era, they haven’t adapted for the times whatsoever and expect the rest of us to slow our roll.

You don’t have to have a twitter account. You don’t have to use the internet. Go home, old hag, you clearly hate what the internet is about. Nobody gives a shit if you’re an MP if your points suck donkey balls. Those people disagreeing were trying to help you! Become more relevant!

The internet is not for people like her, she isn’t tall enough for this ride.

Young people aren’t buying papers these days, let alone The Guardian (its readership is dead/dying, look up the data). If they had a paywall, their traffic count couldn’t justify all those journalists – and you know they wouldn’t fire all the white ones! The Guardian’s white journalists rake in the majority of their traffic because the Boomers reading it only want to read them (e.g. Toynbee).

This is Old Media (dying media) protectionism.

If politics is a “science”, they can hide data behind paywalls far, far away from the voting plebs!

Because you can make a feeling illegal?

Oh, but only when white people do it, right? Then aren’t the police guilty of hate crimes? Because their motive is to punish a white person for doing one thing but no other group?

Equality under the law is dead, buried, dug up, raped and put on display.

justice is no longer blind but carries a microscope.

What you hypothetically might feel according to the psychics of the British Establishment can and will be used to put you in prison or with a criminal record.

Meanwhile, rape gets you off almost with nothing.

History will not smile on the little Hitlers coming up with this suppression.

 

Illegal thoughts

If you expect you know what I think about this, you would be wrong.

I am not an easy person to second-guess.

History is not a science, as many are falsely led to believe.

It is a matter of reconstructing unreliable eyewitness testimony with presumptions and secondhand reports.

New evidence changes it all the time.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/nazi-grandma-on-the-run-caught-ursula-haverbeck-holocaust-denier-germany-jailed-denial-auschwitz-a8341876.html

If science can be questioned openly, there is no reason to deny history and give it a religious status.

Blasphemy is not a crime in this day and age, nothing else should be either.

If something untrue is claimed, it is easy to provide counter-arguments.
This is possible even when both sides are wrong, as happens in academia.

The general conclusion any sensible observer would make is that they cannot answer her claims.

By imprisoning her, this will cause intelligent people to seek out those claims, to see if they can indeed be debunked.

This was not a smart move. It is illiberal in the extreme, she is basically prisoner Zero in the concentration camp, ironically. Remember, the first prisoners were there for thinking illegal thoughts. They were kept there until they could be released in a body bag.

For instance, the six million lie has already been debunked many times by scholars.

This includes the intellectually honest, Jewish ones.

http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/Bauer/OOF_121189.html

The New York Times 1989

AT Auschwitz, it is inscribed in stone: four million people died in the Nazi camps.

No, they changed the sign.

Again.

And they don’t discount illness or injury, as you would expect with a murder wording.
Auschwitz was a hospital camp, lot of those.

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120630074432AAmDmjc

“As you say the figure on the plaques was dropped from four million persons to 1.5 million. 
In the meantime there have been further revisions downwards, and from quasi official sources.
I’m certainly not an expert on this like some on this page claim to be but one such reduction was in 2002. The managing editor and prestigious journalist Fritjof Meyer of the newspaper “Der Spiegel” wrote an article (in another paper) stating that the figure was a lot lower. He reckoned it to be between 700,000 to 950,000. So the trend continues. 
One wonders whether this trend will progress to even lower figures in the future. ”

How is questioning, the business of history, considered illegal?

History is often re-categorized many times also. Technically, all deaths during a war are war deaths. To splinter off a portion doesn’t make sense. How can one calculate this? Especially on almost non-existent, easily forged documents? The Soviets were known to be lying, it was later found. To deny one death occurred a particular way shouldn’t be illegal, it’s basic forensics. What is the meaningful difference of one, to two million, to over five million in reduction, when all are statistics in history’s books? It’s totally arbitrary. And isn’t it a good thing that fewer humans died?? The numbers fluctuate on many events for many reasons. Bombing dead, for example, can only be estimated since some bodies were never recovered.

When do they ironically round up for imprisonment all those who disagree with a false six million narrative?

Even the locations themselves deny this now, shall we round up all the administrators, tour guides and visitors too?

This is literally the dumbest thing Germany could do.

Nothing could induce a rebellious youth to read the newly re-published Mein Kampf more.

Don’t listen to me, listen to this guy from 1989.

Yehuda Bauer, left, one of the foremost historians of the HoIocaust and a sworn enemy of those who deny its reality, says that the number of victims was less than half that.

Very Nazi-sounding name.

Why is Mr. Bauer, the Director of the Division of HoIocaust Studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem’s Institute of Contemporary Jewry, insisting that far fewer people, including far fewer Jews, died at Auschwitz than is commonly reported?

“A historian’s first duty is to tell the truth,”

Mr. Bauer said. And in this case the truth is horrible enough. Exaggerating the number of dead at Auschwitz, he said, “would only be grist for the mills of the deniers of the Holocaust.”

Exactly.