Video: not an argument

People miss how beautiful that expression is. However, in specific cases, they should be able to break it down precisely why or they themselves have no reply, no argument, simply an assertion.
You have no requirement to answer a non-question, it’s a habit of socializing that we speak upon the completion of a sentence, it doesn’t require that sentence have merit. The Burden of Proof rests on the initial speaker, still.

Yet it can’t be used to outright deny or dismiss without having a specific reason why.


Meanwhile, the only way to effectively deal with r-types, ignore them, however loudly they scream.

See Best Post.


You only protect your own, but they have made it clear they are against you. Don’t lift a finger.
They say strength is bad until they want you to use it on their behalf.

Hey, if they’re so strong without their weapons, if their arguments have the same calibre as a bullet, go right on ahead and let them stand independently, you oppressive shitlord, and die that way if necessary. It’s what they would’ve wanted.

If evil imports evil, what is there to save?

Yourself, is the answer to that question.

Self-interest is rational. Pathological altruism is insanity.
You help those who would help you, the other side of the golden rule. Darwin’s rules. Sacrifice for people who would sacrifice you is patriotism dialed up to the incredible level of a cartoon character.

I swear most of Molly’s job is talking down the autistic from their pedestal of self-righteous stupidity.
If anyone deserves the Rasputin treatment, it’s a terrorist. Thankfully, your taxes go to pay people with guns already. The Parliament attacker guy? Shot, if memory serves, by a white guy with glasses. In a country that stupidly restricted guns. Even we don’t need you, Gun Bro. If the State can’t do the basic thing of shooting the bad guys for us…

I’ve never, ever heard of a liberal defending a conservative from any attack, ever.
Anyone?
They are not like you. They do not like you. Partially because you would defend them, implicitly stating they’re too weak to do it themselves. If you respect them as adults, leave them be. Let them live (and die) free. You are not their precious State, you have no duty to them, you are not getting paid, that is not your job ~z-snap~. You can’t play hero to two villains. They have engineered this setup on purpose. By importing violent left-wingers, they get the distraction to sneak off (reward of cowardice: survival) and the claim to victory (reward of victory). They literally do not lose.

If they don’t value their own safety, why should you?
America is too diverse to be united. You have the Diverse States of America.

He’s wrong about signalling (thinking) as a sign of tribe. Anyone can signal, its value is nil. How many of those diverse callers would help him, if he needed it? The odds are against, aren’t they? There are plenty of r-types signalling K as the idea spreads to new groups and creeps into mainstream awareness. The other day I heard a random cafe-owner say, “I want to protect this country, I’m like a wolf.” R-types invade by signalling. It’s a social invasion, they’re the fifth column, the barbarians sacking Rome from the inside, a swarm of locusts crying out as they hit you. History has taught us the hard way that ideological unity comes from genetic homogeneity.
The culture war is one of ideas. The weapon is a meme. A tiny little piece of information, a snippet of truth.

Signallers are, more often than not, liars.

They signal whatever ‘virtue’ is powerful, hoping for scraps from that table.

They are the begging dogs of society, asking you to hunt for them. It’s like every time Roosh calls for “someone! do something!” and his little internet boyfriends scurry to rescue the damsel and White Knights whatever he asks for. What are you, his wife? At least “think of the children!” defends the helpless. Adults have no business defending other adults. They rise and fall on their own merit, raised or dashed on their own petard.
K-society says: They do it themselves or it doesn’t get done.
R-society? It’s very espionage, ultra deceptive.
They offer you friendship while holding a knife in their other hand. They extend an olive branch first because it’s less effort, not because they like you or believe in the healing power of metaphor. There is a bargain they author, that you never asked for, and if you don’t like it, the carrot, they’ll ‘offer’ the stick. This is called a con. Con artists rely on confidence and trust. Virtue signallers rely on confidence and trust…

They want control over you, that is their power, to wiggle you like a little puppet.

In a victim culture, they are the biggest victims. In a K-shift, they are magically K-leaning.
Occam says: It’s all a lie.

I warned you, years ago. I knew these interlopers would pop up like fleas.
They don’t mind you dancing the right-wing jig as long as it’s to their exact tune.

Guess which is which.

If your friends are your enemies, you’ll never succeed. How to test?

A k-type invented the expression: actions speak louder than words. Until I see you sacrifice for this tribe, it owes nothing to you. If all you have are words, speak to the birds.

Just because someone is smoke-signalling your tribe doesn’t mean they’re on your side. Indeed, this makes it less likely, a friend doesn’t feel the need to keep reminding you they’re not a foe, not a threat, like they’re anticipating something…

DO NOT TRUST A DODGY SIGNAL.

The incongruence should ping to you. What’s in it for you?

In the super-complex theories of strategy, this is called A Trap. It’s a primitive form of distraction by claiming Ally while wearing the coat of your enemy to cuckold him for whatever reason before attacking when factors are on your side and you can turn your coat back and show your true colours. This is the problem with games like chess, where the colours never change sides because they were bribed or got bored. You never get betrayed in chess because the enemy never falters and it’s all very polite and open, two equal lines fairly opposing one another with Queensberry rules. That was 2nd generation warfare, we’re on four. Then again, maybe it’s a commentary on the reality that a leopard can’t change its spots. Who knows? I certainly don’t.

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/226350.html
“Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.”
They don’t fully quote it for some strange reason. The Bible is actually very witty.

Ask – why do they want your trust? Why aren’t they doing literally anything else? What’s their game? 

It’s a great way to buy time when you know you’d lose in a fair fight.

aka cheating

If this was the 15th century, a ship running up your flag is probably pirates.

And they won’t kill you with rum.

Newsflash: BAD GUYS LIE. THEY LIE OR THEY WON’T FOOL YOU LONG ENOUGH TO WIN.

Back to terrorism. All the way back, centuries and centuries and centuries, like the ideas.

Self-proclaimed liberals have a lot in common with the mythological ‘moderate Muslim’; that is to say, they will claim to be loving and giving until they have power and numbers to be the opposite of those things.

The ‘American Indian’ only gave with the expectation of receiving more in future.

A liberal is a dictator waiting to happen. Biding their time until everyone else has disarmed and made nice.
They know exactly what they are doing. That is what guys like these do not get. Everyone else is slowly waking up. We make memes.

comment
“So if I’m understanding Stefan’s argument correctly it is: “While you certainly have the right to defend yourself, you have zero obligation to defend anyone else against a threat.” Is that the argument you are taking issue with? If so, what is your counterargument? If there is an obligation to defend others where does it come from?”
They want all conservatives to rush to protect them, like the police. While we are occupied, they survive and screw over the next batch of rueful idiots. The type who, at the Gates of Saint Peter, would claim the moral victory is more important.
The self-styled ‘liberals’ scoff at loyalty to children, nuclear family and country… until it comes to discussions of noblesse oblige (without class???), pensions, the social contract and human rights (without property rights). Then it’s all about universalism, collectivism and helping those who can’t/won’t help themselves. They are morally relative, liberal with logic ….wrong, in bad faith (100% deliberate). What they say is usually ‘not an argument’ because it comes from a hypocrite (no-proof), a deceiver (valid use, not ad hominem) and they argue it from bad faith, really pushing something else entirely under the radar.

They are loyal to their own body, especially the neck. They don’t want to save the pandas, they want to save their own skin.

In common speech here, they’re ‘trying it on’ i.e. they know they’re lying to get what they want and disappear when their half comes due, but they’re hoping you don’t know that.

All their virtue signals are overt pleas to get, without giving. 

Argument and clause. Devil and detail. Plan and plot.

Essentially it’s;
>HELP THE OUTGROUP! THE INDIVIDUAL IS NOTHING TO THE GROUP! SACRIFICE AT ALL COSTS!
>…STOP DEFINING THE INGROUP! THAT MODEL IS REDUNDANT AND EVIL!
and that, my friends, is why we mock them.
See: Why mockery?

It is also why you shouldn’t trust ambassadors. 300 was right.

That diverse cast of people calling into Molyneux are attempting to appease him while he gains power (they smell a whiff and cannot yet crush him) and then to advise him to his destruction once he has gained it (and after they have gained his trust). That is what high-IQ r-types DO. The toxic friends of the world. The fairweather traitors and degenerate preachers.

Clinically, they have many names. Sociopath tops the list.

Question a normal person: #crickets

Question a sociopath: you are (lie), (lie) and (lie), evil person! Appease me! Account for your sin!

They’ve found a scapegoat to slaughter.

Sociopaths especially detest those who describe their tactics to the masses for protection.

You can’t defame the truth, though, can you?

Was mass immigration a conspiracy?

aka

Why did Labour lose the last two elections? Not just the one after Rotherham?

https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/pressArticle/83

The strongest evidence for conspiracy comes from one of Labour’s own. Andrew Neather, a previously unheard-of speechwriter for Blair, Straw and Blunkett, popped up with an article in the Evening Standard in October 2009 which gave the game away.

Immigration, he wrote, ‘didn’t just happen; the  deliberate policy of Ministers from late 2000…was to open up the UK to mass immigration’.

That’s beyond gerrymandering into outright voter fraud.

He was at the heart of policy in September 2001, drafting the landmark speech by the then Immigration Minister Barbara Roche, and he reported ‘coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn’t its main purpose – to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date’.

Instead it’s proven Enoch correct.

Multiculturalism has failed.
Swedish feminists are moving out of No-go zones full of Muslims they voted to welcome.

That seemed, even to him, a manoeuvre too far.

Tony Blair removed the death penalty for treason……

look it up…….

The result is now plain for all to see. Even Blair’s favourite think tank, the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), commented recently: ‘It is no exaggeration to say that immigration under New Labour has changed the face of the country.’

Passports*

easily taken back

they leave as soon the economy properly tanks

or they’re drafted into a war

whichever comes first

the interesting part will be going after what they owe this country, once they’ve left

never piss off the white people, it’s world war or nothing

yet they treat us like simpering ninnies

like the colonies thing was a coincidence

It is not hard to see why Labour’s own apparatchiks supported the policy. Provided that the white working class didn’t cotton on, there were votes in it.

Now they’ve lost the WWC.
The response?

Not to earn the core voter base back.

But to continue betraying them by importing rapists for their daughters.

The WWC is proud, in a word. They do not forget grudges over generations.
WWC votes are often the Kingmaker in FPTP. That’s why Labour backed altering it.

Research into voting patterns conducted for the Electoral Commission after the 2005 general election found that 80 per cent of Caribbean and African voters had voted Labour, while only about 3 per cent had voted Conservative and roughly 8 per cent for the Liberal Democrats.

The Asian vote was split about 50 per cent for Labour, 10 per cent Conservatives  and 15 per cent Liberal Democrats.

That meets all the criteria for treason.

Giving people citizenship on the probable basis of how they’ll vote.

Video: Milo finally shanks Whitey in the back

Is he still your token fag, redditfags?

translation

“give up goyim”
“winning is mean”

What we told you he’d do all along.

Don’t listen to science saying these people are different, listen to ‘reason’.
Appreciate that we’re all equal…. citation needed.
Don’t self-determine because that isn’t a human right.
Let the SJWs keep dictating social policy because I’m whore-positive.
Let us degenerate your culture because you shouldn’t care. You shouldn’t care!
Let me cuck for you, straight white man, and speak for you and control the narrative of identity politics for the right.
You can trust me, Christian White people.
Ignore all HBD and proof of social harm by antisocial behaviours. Nothing is wrong. Don’t get angry.

He isn’t a cuck really at this point, he’s a mole and a saboteur you allowed to burrow deep into your…. movement.

I said he’d turn on men eventually.
This sounds straight out of the social justice handbook.

let’s have a conversation, you need to listen (and obey), let me lovebomb you and flatter you into apathy, we are never a threat despite opposing everything you literally are

White people not hating one another is their biggest fear.
Because white people actually accomplish things when they aren’t punching their neighbours (male, female).

‘Give up Europe to my future boyfriends’.
We don’t need women, well, you do, but I won’t ever reproduce so I can afford to shun them.
I don’t care for the future of the West because I don’t even have the foresight to wear condoms and I’m neither fully Western nor will I live to see that shit.

“What do you want, a fucking parade?” taken too far, this is the homosexual event horizon.

Note the shame on you tone.
He has no moral authority to judge anyone. If they want a strong nation, a non-terrorist West they need strong men, which includes not fucking around like a dog and being worthy of respect.

It’s been taken too far, you need to stop – controlled opposition says what?
That’s literally what the SJWs have been saying. Appeal to moderation.

I’ll believe all people are equal when they behave like it.

That nurture I heard so much about.

A lot of times when SJWs say bigotry, they mean integrity. White people aren’t allowed a culture or any heritage, unlike everyone else, according to him. You can tell he really wants to use the B-word, when he’s full-on anti-white and revealed his true colours, finally.

The male c-word: CUCK

I’ve been waiting to do this post for a while. Biding my time. OK, let’s go.Even better, give them a pitying look and smirk no matter what they say.

Heavy on meme. Short on brain.

shitposthistory

arcuck

It isn’t the fetish. It refers to a brand of traitorous self-proclaimed conservatives that don’t even talk the talk. A milquetoast inefficiency born of fear of disapproval. An ideological traitor but fence-sitter and desperate people-pleaser. They will betray their ingroup to please the outgroup that will never accept them, and they know this.

A peculiar kind of betrayal charaterised by ingroup loathing, as opposed to self-loathing. In fact, all they care for is reputation, being densely narcissistic.

Cuckservatism: Seeking approval from other (usually liberal) men like they’re your wife.

Example? Exhibit A:

cuckproof

cuckchicken

Yes, that’s the reason. Some of you may remember my use of this meme.

It has nothing to do with the paraphilia, it’s the sound a chicken makes.

It’s the male c-word because it attacks the inconsolable male weakness: cowardice.
This is intentional. It precisely targets their masculinity, since they push androgyny.
It points out their non-traditional sexual practices, for mockery. As manwhores.
This is intentional.
Obviously I knew this but I question how many others do?
Technically, the first man I called a cuck was Roosh. I don’t think he got it.

It’s psyops. It attacks their lifestyle.

By comparison, ‘cunt’ attacks the source of femininity and female power. It doesn’t really work unless you hate women. What’s so bad about having one? Men go into debt to rent one.
Everyone hates a skeeze and a traitor. They don’t care for truth but for selfish profit. They signal altruism but sell your future down the river, counting your shekels.

carrlthecuck

cuckecheese cuckfb cuckglenn cuckhappen

It relies on a tropism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_faith#Psychology

“While self-deception may be a tropism, not consciously done, it may be guided by “projects” one may set for one’s life, such as a desire for personal pleasure, wealth, power, or to get into heaven”

cuckles cuckonme

‘a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’

cuckreddit

We’ve been cucking for political parties for years, I simply pointed it out.
Fetish secondary definition: Voting for them while they screw us.

cucktales cucktrump everyoneisacuck

nowisnotthetime

wordofday

altrightrobot

To be perfectly frank, I’m surprised it spread this far.
I just thought the chicken anime thing was funny.

I suppose it demonstrates the finer principles of ‘why mockery?’ I discussed.
The truth won’t get a cuck’s attention. All they care about is reputation. Tell the truth about that, and he’ll listen to you. We keep using insults in circulation because they work.

I never thought pigs were the appropriate metaphor for bad men. Chickens.
Bland and annoying.

Well, there we are.

Finally.

Bonus question: in the original yodel video, it sounds like he’s saying another meme.
Which one could it be?

weareallshitpostershere

I recently became a meme so I’m trying to restore my meme karma.

Link: 9 ways to spot an anti-White

Good site.
thisiseuropa.net/9-ways-tell-someone-anti-white/

They call their opponents racist, for one. *side-eyes Roosh*

They tend to have White opponents.

They feel Europe is their landmass and they can visit, remain and claim anything they want here, from work to benefits, over the natives.

The native Europeans should accommodate them.

They say revolution, they mean sedition and treason. They don’t care for democracy.

They call for Patriarchy, in an example of false-flagging, yet refuse to enact their gender roles and marry, provide, support children etc.

They point to the fellow next to them in character deficiency and crime and accuse him of blame-worthy behaviours, in the hopes you’ll assume he is on your side and chivalrously fight his battles for him “Let’s you and him fight” and he only has to deal with you (by getting yet another naive person to fight you for him again). He’ll try to turn you on your own allies by claiming they are Fifth Columnists, in a classic demonstration of projection. When hard times come, they will flee, whatever they promised you.

They wish to turn White men on White women, to scoop up the women for themselves.
http://thisiseuropa.net/overcome-men-vs-women-attitude/
The sexes need one another, it’s a fact of nature, and anyone who endorses the feminist adversarial stance of Gender Wars (also used to rentseek) is trying to turn you into a genetic suicide (future non-threat). The difference between sexes is less than the HBD between races. We are brothers and sisters.

Delight in the cuckold fantasy future of Beige People and refuse to hear evidence about why their ‘stronger stock’ theory is a myth (see my post on Hybrid Vigour for details).

They support multiculturalism – in your neighbourhood.

They support welfare – and tax dodge.

They support the various forms of White genocide: displacement in the workforce, replacement locally, outbreeding, forced adoption, conditions intended to suppress White thriving etc.

Ideally, White women should reproduce with non-Whites and White men should reproduce with non-Whites too. A White-White couple makes them retch and natural genophilia is considered a sin, even on dating sites.

The words “But White people….” and usually followed by either accusations of inherent evil or “don’t exist”.

If non-White and male, they feel entitled to free sex with White women, whatever the wishes of the women themselves, because, for example, ‘sexual emergency’ and a form of sexual redistribution for low SMV/IQ/SES, on emotional grounds aka “feewings” to cover their true “muh dick” ruler or recently what’s called a “mud dick” orientation, where they reject their own women as inferior and feel free to plunder the women who rightfully belong to their own people (and statistics back up this is a choice). ‘Game’ is the name of the coercion used to accomplish this, and it’s a dirty little secret the stark majority of so-called PUAs are in fact, non-White predating on White females. If anyone can find proof contrary to this, please respond. They expect White women to be their willing sex slaves and porn whores.

rooshvdefaultopinionwhoremisogyny

Should this manipulation (including intoxication by drugs and/or drink, nullifying consent) fail, they resort to rape, and if caught, accuse the victim of filing a ‘false accusation’. Like Cologne NYE 2016, right?

omg why no facepalm god ugh wut

I am getting so much use out of this gif.

P.S. Yes, drink and drugs and the consent issue would also apply to men. Plenty of male rape victims were drunk at the time, that is the entire reason the homosexual men or hetero women could overpower them physically, sometimes when they were blacked out. Plenty of gay men try to seduce their straight friends, they think it’s a ‘game’ too and get them blotto for the purpose, these innocent men deserve legal protection too. However, the assailant (aka the one who made a choice by mens and actus reus to instigate the physical act/s) cannot use this as an excuse, because they engaged (much like stepping behind the wheel of a car, knowing it was wrong) and the law holds drunk/drugged people to self-restraint standards.

Impotent r-white rage and mass immigration

Bear with me on this.
I tried a thought experiment where I think like a rabbity r-type.

Considering
r-types hate K-types
Considering
r-types cannot fight K-types
Considering
the weakness of K-types is their women, who they need to breed successfully
Considering
feminism hasn’t really affected K-women and killed their maternal instinct
Considering
the value of a K-woman is her purity
Considering
the r-types won’t rape them themselves and can’t pick them up for cheap sex
Considering
the r-types’ media apologia for foreign criminals
Considering
foreign overpopulation and the chaos that causes
Considering
the number of rabid monsters those systems produce as nature and nurture fuse
Considering
there is a human rights angle to immigrate these people or sneak them in the borders
Considering
once they have legal representation, they’re pretty much staying
Considering
the appeals process goes on for years and prison sentences rarely result in deportation
Considering
most of the West leaves unchaperoned women unguarded most of the time
Considering
revenge attacks on the foreigners will be punished harsher than the original crime and ruin lives of those seeking justice
Considering
foreigners can play the Pity me criminology says I’m the ~real~ victim card
Considering
expert witnesses can be bribed to testify for their side
Considering
the death penalty doesn’t exist, making the number of retries infinite
Considering
they want to see their kinsmen suffer
Considering
they openly claim to love women
Considering
those women still refuse to give up what they want (sex)
Considering
they want to punish these women, who guard their sexuality with pride
Considering
they resent and brood and plot revenge as omegas
Considering
they enjoy ironic punishments, sarcastic, almost karmic-seeming to feed into the Secret King delta stuff, and they feel inferior to conservative white women, impotent sexually
Considering
they need to enable the foreign immigrant hordes into being their usual rapist/hostile selves
Considering
they forment and incite rage and anger at the host nation for being racist/other forms of Lefty evil
Considering
they can always throw their hands up in regret and cry “I tried to change them”
Considering
they can rentseek a career out of their own supposed failure
Considering
when their friends commit suicide they get to brag about it
Considering
increasing chaos will benefit them as losers by balancing the scales
Considering
others’ pain is the only thing that makes them happy
Considering
they cannot openly indulge this sadistic need
Considering
many K-families and hence, women, are rural originally
Considering
open borders mean no criminal checks for e.g. rape charges
Considering
the invaders can be deported once the crimes are complete, making it the Perfect Crime (treason)
Considering
they perversely enjoy their own suffering because of middle class guilt
Why wouldn’t they invite brown invaders to rape and ruin conservative women and mug/attack/kill the conservative men?
If the K-women gets pregnant, so much the better
Considering
conservative women consider abortion evil
What better way to make them pay for ignoring him, failed white man?

This destroys the future, the culture, provides entertainment, a job, external therapy for inner neurosis, something to talk about, something to lobby for, something to attack K-men over, opportunities for freebies, social kudos from your fellow damaged friends and a way to gather without recognising your impotence…

Higher numbers are required to reach the rural women. Miscegenation in the media has a rabbity explanation other than feelgood. They want to make the victims feel bad and keep it secret, worse, seek their attackers out socially.

The longer I stare into the abyss, it also stares into me.

This isn’t pathological altruism.

This is sociopathic/sadistic enabling of nationalist revenge.

They’re raping the White woman.
They aren’t cucking, in the age of DNA, they’re using someone else’s dick to do it.
Once this is over, nobody will blame or punish them. Nobody will arrest or seek revenge or deport them.

err what wut wtf scared rdj

GUYS.

GUYS —

TELL ME I’M WRONG.

please

and the women in this, they want to ruin the social competition. Like the Sexual Revolution again.
If there aren’t any pretty wifely women, I can’t feel like an ugly slut.
Not to mention it exorcises their long-dead, aborted maternal instinct when they aren’t nursing other animals.

AM I SEEING THINGS THAT AREN’T THERE.