Tranny sex offender tried sneaking into school

Repeat Sexual Offender Arrested After Dressing Like Woman to Sneak Into School: Geoffrey Kelley

Ballygawley, County Tyrone, UK – A man convicted of three previous sexual offenses has been arrested after he was accused of donning a wig and women’s clothing to enter a local school.

Police accuse Geoffrey Rainey Kelly, aged 35, of putting on a white skirt, pink jacket, pearl necklace and blonde wig, and gaining entry to St Ciaran’s College through a side door.

Not premeditated at all.

School staff say they caught Mr Kelley wandering the halls and attempting to turn the handle on various doors.

When confronted by staff, the man claimed to be searching for a particular third-year female pupil, and gave staff the name. Staff could not find a child listed with the name on the school register, and questioned him further.

Lying.

And what if they had such a kid? Let that thing in a room with them?

Mr Kelly then stated that he was “just looking around.”

It would make sense if most misogynists (sexual predator kind) just pretended to be trannies to attack women in gym showers. It would make sense.

He left the school and drove away in a vehicle, and was later arrested by police at Ballygawley Park and Ride, still wearing the clothing described by St Ciaran’s staff.

Declaring Mr Kelley at high risk of re-offending and noncompliance with bail conditions, Judge Mark McGarrity denied him bail, noting that he had violated a Sexual Offences Prevention Order that bans him from coming within 20 meters of schools and other places frequented by minors under age 18.

like only minors should be protected?

Mr Kelly has prior convictions for sexual assaulting female individuals in 2016 and 2017, and a 2017 conviction for entering a clothing store and emerging from the changing room fully naked in front of a 16-year-old girl who was employed there.

Rehabilitation is impossible when they enjoy offending, literally.

The cure for pedophilia is lead.

also here

Sex offender caught wandering school dressed as woman

Also, library drag freak a convicted pedophile.

“Drag Queen Storytime” Reader at Houston Library a Convicted Paedophile: Albert Garza

Pedos don’t dress up like the big bad wolf anymore, but a hooker.

Criminals all below responsibility age

As if by magic.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-20/not-onion-scholar-makes-moral-case-letting-people-decide-their-own-age

Bio-ethicists say it’s okay to rip organs out of living people without anesthesia.

They are socialists who will say anything is “moral” if you pay them.

You don’t let the guy claiming to be Napoleon lead a battle.

The creeps want to be allowed in child spaces – especially changing rooms.

Bring back cubicles. All people have a right to modesty.

They want to legally force children to “play” with them, including rough and tumble.

Actual mental youth is retardation (slow or stopped development, slow in children, stopped by of age).

Medically, they’re literally claiming to be retarded, in which case, they should lose adult rights – like voting or living away from home.

A minor isn’t allowed a credit card, for example.

They shouldn’t be safe to drive. They cannot view porn.

We already have “mental age” laws – for the retarded.

Ageism doesn’t mean you can change it – it refers to biological maturation and biological aging/dying (gerontology). There’s one fact which is ageist – death. Your telomeres aren’t deluded.

Social ageism simply refers to advantages based on generation of birth e.g. Boomers had cheaper everything to set themselves up. It isn’t pro-old nor pro-young.

Government infantilisation is still abuse, infantilisation is a known abusive tactic.

This is why you kinkshame the fetishists, or they ALL come out.

Feelings entitle you to FUCK ALL.

What is this, temporal dysmorphia?

I think I’d make a rather good go of living in the Victorian era, you don’t see me bitching about it.*

(Cept now.)

*I’d teach them to make/grow opium, thereby cutting out the Chinese. Shouldn’t be hard, it’s a flower.

Be careful what you bring in.

I am hereby old enough to receive full retirement monies and I identify as a life-long theatrical union member, pay me.

A pension used to be earned with full military service (risk of death). We don’t have pensions anymore, we have welfare for managing not to die.

Logically, mothers should get pensions for risking death in the pro-social endeavor of giving society more children. Like Russia’s payment system. It would sweeten taking years out of the workforce, where the primary concern is not having an employer-matched 401k. By the time they cash it in, more of it’s inflated away anyway. Women don’t work in public service all their fertile years to still be there, Old Betsy at 80. Careerists can’t rely on a husband not to abandon them in old age and only work for the pension.

Whites least likely homosexual

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2220120/White-people-likely-gay-Huge-study-reveals-highest-proportion-homosexual-people-African-American-community.html

“The survey – based on interviews with more than 121,000 people – contradicts the perception that lesbians and gays are mostly white, urban and affluent, said lead author Gary Gates.”
“‘But this data reveals that relative to the general population, the LGBT population has a larger proportion of non-white people and clearly is not overly wealthy.’”

In evolutionary terms, you don’t have to raise children you can’t make.

I cannot find survey data on what percentage of mixed race people aren’t straight.
That is weird.

It’s basic demographics, why is that buried?

You would think they’d shout it from the rooftops.
But parents want grandkids, don’t they? Or their own investment is worthless.

Very little research has been done into which races are more likely to be homosexual.”

That sounds likely.

“Estimates of the proportion of the population who are lesbian or gay range from 2 per cent to 10 per cent, although recent US surveys have put it at around 4 per cent.
In 2010, a survey by the Office for National Statistics concluded that 1.5 per cent of Britons identified themselves as gay or bisexual, although a 2008 poll put the proportion at 6 per cent.”

If you sample urban gay areas, your data will be skewed.

This is interesting but twists things.

http://www.mixedracestudies.org/wordpress/?tag=journal-of-the-history-of-sexuality

“The concept of continuity was harnessed to growing attention to miscegenation, or “amalgamation,” in social science writing in the first decades of the twentieth century. Edward Byron Reuter’s The Mulatto in the United States, for instance, pursued an exhaustive quantitative and comparative study of the mulatto population and its achievements in relation to those of “pure” white or African ancestry.”

That bias isn’t science, it’s propaganda.

How little he turned up is great negative evidence though.

Spot the frauds.

“Xavier Mayne, for example, one of the earliest American advocates of homosexual rights, wrote, “Between whitest of men and the blackest negro stretches out a vast line of intermediary races as to their colours: brown, olive, red tawny, yellow.” He then invoked this model of race to envision a continuous spectrum of gender and sexuality: “Nature abhors the absolute, delights in the fractional. . . . Intersexes express the half-steps, the between-beings ”

Most hermaphrodites are infertile.

We evolve FOR one thing and AGAINST another.

Nature loves the absolute, bears can’t breathe underwater.

You evolve for ONE ecosystem at the EXCLUSION of all else.

This is Origin of the Species tier, old biology. This guy’s anti-evolution.

“In this analogy, Mayne reversed dominant cultural hierarchies that privileged purity over mixture. Drawing upon irrefutable evidence of the “natural” existence of biracial people,”

What about the evidence of their fertility issues?

And there’s no such thing as irrefutable in biology on the level of individuals.

Real identity problem, huh?

If race doesn’t matter, why pretend you have one?

Miscellaneous is not a category, that’s a category error.

Why have racial pride if that’s the root of evil to you?
And how can atheists believe pride is a sin?

“Mayne posited a direct analogy to a similarly mixed body, the intersex, which he positioned as a necessary presence within the natural order.”

False equivalence. Naturalistic fallacy.

You can see the slow creep of genocidal rhetoric.

Pure races have a human birthright to exist in their homeland, invader.

If you want the whites kicked out of Africa but not the blacks from America, you’re a massive hypocrite.

Scared of the word “vagina”

MISOGYNISTS

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/08/healthline-website-says-the-term-vagina-is-not-gender-inclusice-will-start-using-front-hole-instead/

When various politicians avoided the word in a reproductive debate, that’s what they were called.

Men don’t get to define womanhood. “Front hole” is the cake hole, obviously.

They hate women because it’s competition for straight men. Really. They only pretend to be female to rape men. It’s the sneaky fucker strategy.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/07/04/book-the-man-who-would-be-queen-transgender-psychology/

Literally their thought process.

“Will I be more successful getting straight men as a woman than I am at getting gay men as a man?” (The last decision has to be weighted by a particular transsexual’s degree of preference for straight versus gay men. Most vastly prefer straight men.)” Rapists.

Disgusting rapists.

Straight men don’t want them. NO MEANS NO.

Legal recognition as a “woman” is about coercion and rape, so men can’t object. I won’t stand for it.

They do everything they can to oppress women (we can’t say vagina, really eunuch?) and if they had their way, they’d just kill us all as sexual competition, it’s insanity. You’ll see.

The violence is the reason they want to be “women”, actually female-passing, they think, sociopathically, it’ll be easier to get away with legally. They’re testing the woman-bashing theories of MRA’s perverse interpretation of gynocentrism and every time, it fails.

e.g. expect to see more of this, tranny rage. Testing the law.

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2018/08/04/jury-rejects-transgenders-claim-that-transition-medication-caused-him-to-try-to-kill-3-people-with-an-axe-660657

When they aren’t above the law, cue crocodile tears and the incredible sulk.
They aren’t in another state or anything, they’re actually aroused by the thought of violence. They’re more present.
Medically, reducing your testosterone levels would make you less violent (there are studies), so you’re doubly responsible 1. for doing it, nutjob and 2. for blaming women’s hormones (sexist) and lying in court (perjury).

Remember Ed Gein.

Cross-dressing is a trait of serial killers and has been studied as a top fetish in prison populations.
They get angry (and the threats are all translated “you wouldn’t like me when I’m angry”) because when you spot a predator (mask drop), it attacks! [This is what real women put up with, with creepy straights. Exactly this, the intimidation, coercion and “the creeps” survival instinct.] They’ll also target young (underage) men/boys because, like most sexual predators, they take advantage of the benefit of the doubt (trust), how society enables them with myths and social inexperience. Men must discuss how to avoid predators themselves, the time is now. Learn about freeze responses and ways to escape such a situation. There’s widespread grooming of adults and minors to accept the behaviour as “good” and “fun” whatever their personal objection (conscience).

Intimidation – you aren’t allowed to find me sexually repulsive gaslighting (I’ve written before that if you aren’t allowed to be sexually repulsed, you aren’t free).

Coercion – scared you might like it? It doesn’t count as gay…

I mentioned a study I could scrape up before.

You aren’t allowed to study these anymore.

Paraphilias deserve no legal protected status, look at these!

-Gender games

https://www.mercatornet.com/conjugality/view/the-myth-of-the-transgender-desistance-myth/21592

It’s a phase caused to numb the pain of an unhappy time in a person’s life, like SJWism or MGTOW.

Transgender: it isn’t you, it’s your anatomy. (logically, still you)
SJW: it isn’t you, it’s white people. (so no, they aren’t feminists, race>sex or male examples wouldn’t exist)
MGTOW: it isn’t you, it’s women. (usually white women, so cucks)

When the time passes, it disappears like a goth phase. Otherwise, Hulk rage.

Last month a new chapter was opened in the debate on childhood desistance with the publication of a new article in the International Journal of Transgenderism by a group of transgender-affirming activists and clinicians headed by Julia Temple Newhook. Desistance is when children who are diagnosed as gender dysphoric by medical practitioners go on to accept their bodies and do not end up identifying as transgender once they have passed through puberty. The article questions the exceedingly high rates of desistance reported by previous studies.

Kenneth Zucker’s rebuttal, “The myth of persistence,” is a brilliant riposte. Zucker, a psychologist and clinical lead from 1981 to 2015 at the Child Youth and Family Gender Identity Clinic (GIC), Center for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), is an internationally renowned specialist in the field of gender dysphoria and gender-identity development as well as the editor of the journal  Archives of Sexual Behavior.

Just pointing out it’s a mental illness will get you arrested here.

Are anorexics fat too? Must I be forced to agree publicly? (dysphoria has many forms)

What about class dysphoria? Must I treat a poor man like a rich man?

This has been about revoking your right to “treat as you find” and express disapproval.

The American Psychiatric Association named Zucker to be the head of the Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders group in 2008 for the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, also known as the  DSM-5, and he is a member of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health  (WPATH). In short, Zucker is a professionally trained psychologist with a profound expertise in gender dysphoria and the intricacies involved with childhood gender identity disorder (GID) diagnosis (which was reclassified as Gender Dysphoria under the DSM-5).  …

Trans activists spearheaded a successful campaign to have Zucker terminated following what Jesse Singal refers to as a “show trial.”

SJWs Always Lie.

Turkeys for Christmas.

It goes to show the depth of their illness, when if you don’t mutilate and harm their group, they’ll punish you.

To reconcile the cognitive dissonance (e.g. cosmetic surgery won’t change a misdiagnosed personality disorder) they force others to make the same mistake out of spite, in a classic sunk cost fallacy.

Typically, if someone wants a ton of cosmetic surgery and a complete physical overhaul, you’d be looking at NPD, BPD and possibly ASPD if they want to look “sexier” (to be a better predator). It’s like changing the cover on a lamp, it doesn’t really matter. In a personality disorder, they will never, ever admit this. Because there’s no bulb.

They want to know they’re worth spending the money on for surgery. Narcissistic, seeking external validation. Covert narcissism can present as constant victimhood and helplessness (a manipulation tactic). The money as a lump sum would work on this group because they’d suddenly “change their mind” and not want surgery.

OR that they can manipulate the clinicians to get what they want, sociopathic. So they’d push for brain surgery if it were the most prestigious treatment option.

OR they think it would actually help, having no stable identity to show, borderline (halfway between neurotic and psychotic). Then they actually have a reason to commit self-murder because they chopped off and “killed” parts of their anatomy already and there’s no going back. Even if you could magically get a POP! new body, you’d need to do years of brutal psychological hard work (adolescence) developing a real personality. No shortcuts.

Painting a door won’t change the house location.

I would hypothesize that when more follow-up data of children who socially transition prior to puberty become available, the persistence rate will be extremely high. This is not a value judgment—it is simply an empirical prediction . . . parents who support, implement, or encourage a gender social transition (and clinicians who recommend one) are implementing a psychosocial treatment that will increase the odds of long-term persistence.  

Allow the parents to push it on condition that, as an adult, their child can sue them for barbaric sexual mutilation if they’re wrong and using them for attention (abuse!)…

The pills affect brain development so it’d be quite a lawsuit.

Taking the “desistance myth” and inverting it perfectly, Zucker shows how the Temple Newhook commentary speaks against desistance by pushing social transition:

Temple Newhook et al. (2018) go on to state that “It is important to acknowledge that discouraging social transition [with reference to the Dutch team’s putative therapeutic approach] is itself an intervention with the potential to impact research findings . . .” Fair enough. But Temple Newhook et al. (2018) curiously suppress the inverse: encouraging social transition is itself an intervention with the potential to impact findings. I find this omission astonishing.

Translation: liar liar pants on fire