Transhumanism, techno-eugenics for the neo-feudal age

Since people won’t drop this topic, I’ll drop this here.

If you’re sick of affable shills like Stefan dodging these topics, these people are real free-thinkers.

Note the date. 2010.

Suffice to say, I’ve had quite the heads-up.

It’s genetic abuse of plutocracy.

Description:

“Ye shall be as God”, or so the story goes.

«We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated. The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. We must electronically control the brain. Someday armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain.» Dr José Delgado, Yale University Medical School Congressional Record, No. 26, Vol. 118 February 24, 1974

Didn’t they test this on cockroaches?

«What is called for here is not genocide, the killing off of the population of incompetent cultures. But we do need to think realistically in terms of the ‘phasing out’ of such peoples. Evolutionary progress means the extinction of the less competent. Survival of the fittest, extinction of the unfit. This is the way to a better world.» Prof. Richard Lynn (2004), “A Review of ‘A New Morality from Science: Beyondism'”, Irish Journal of Psychology, 2.

Suddenly the hybrid vigour myth becomes rather important.

————————————————-

Transhumanism was founded in the 1950s by top eugenicist Julian Huxley and the Rockefeller Foundation, as a new brand name for the pseudoscience of Eugenics. Its obsession for culling off the ‘genetically inferior’, while at the same time striving to promote dominance for the ‘superior’ had given Eugenics a bad name, particularly after the Nazi brand of Eugenics created the Holocaust, during WWII. Sadly, what most people didn’t know at that time was that Nazi eugenics was merely the full-blown application of the principles that had been developed and were openly espoused by the British, French and American Eugenics Societies. So, Eugenics lived on, under many, heavily funded formats, one of them being Transhumanism. By and large, Transhumanism proposes to use applied science in the fields of genetics, robotics and others, to ‘steer human evolution into the future’. A Transhumanist society will have, as its name implies, ‘transcended humanity’. In such a society, human beings will have been replaced with hyper-efficient worker chimeras, bio-robotic warriors, and other purpose-made humanoid life forms. These stated goals must be tied in with the bigger picture into which Eugenics and Transhumanism fit into. These fields have never been limited to ‘science’ per se — they’ve always been primarily political and economical, and they reflect a very particular view of the world. Under that view, the planet has limited resources, and technological advancement under free market systems cannot be trusted to overcome those limitations (one of the many Malthusian fallacies and myths)

You think you can overcome limitations?

Tell that to the Sun.

— therefore, control must be exercised over the users of resources, to avoid any over-usage of those resources. To exercise that control, eugenicists believe they have to shut down development, and create an heavily regulated social and economic environment. In that controlled environment, those people who are alive must also be economically efficient — i.e., produce more than they consume.

And naturally, other humans are wise enough to decide.

What God complex?

So, on the one hand, the intelligentsia feels it needs to get rid of the ‘wrong’ sorts of people (the masses of ‘unfit’, ‘unemployables’, ‘junk genes’), through techniques such as famine, abortion, sterilization, or euthanasia.

Or be a meritocrat and let them fail.

Ah, but then your own line might end. So in comes bias.

On the other hand, the workers that will be allowed to go on into the future will have to be made into incrementally more ‘efficient’ humans — which will eventually imply robotic add-ons and genetic-engineering.

Internet of objects.

People toasters.

A devolution because they’d literally be disabled with redundant tech compared to complete humans.

For thee but not for me – telling, very telling.

This is none other than the worldwide, dehumanized, hyper-efficient ‘hive society’, that was advocated by eugenicist Charles Galton Darwin in “The Next Million Years”.

Sure appeal to authority and twist better people’s work.

Or, “Our Benevolent Feudalism”, as eugenicist William J. Ghent put it, in his portrayal of the techno-fascist global society that, he said, would eventually be ushered in, using the combined power of finance and science.

((Finance))

The people who can’t run the Fed want control of your liver.

Who are the incompetents here? The workers who literally keep everything running or those who would corrupt their bodies like a microchip Frankenstein version of Operation?

And, of course, it was also explained in romanticized form in the “Brave New World” of Aldous Huxley, who was none other than the brother of Transhumanism founder, Eugenics Society chairman, Julian Huxley.

Romantic? The book about rape?

A neo-feudal, technocratic, new world order. That’s what Eugenics and its offspring Transhumanism, strive for. A system under which you will not just lose your physical rights to independent living (and that is happening right now as this video plays), but you will also be engineered to lose your very soul. Since, as Charles Galton Darwin put it, you will be nothing more than a good worker, which includes being engineered to have the right beliefs, or no beliefs at all. That is the final and most serious note of mental and spiritual disease behind this incredibly selfish and hypocritical paradigm. And that is why it must be stopped.

Selfish? No. Genocidal. Mutilation of the genetic form is genocide.

Being turned into a tool? Mentacide, minimum.

The idiotic American males spitefully calling for artificial wombs need to remember which people would own their offspring. Mother Nature may be a bitch but it isn’t personal.

The likes of Elon Musk are Pied Pipers, psychopomps to the death of freedom.

“Greatest good” involves compulsory brain surgery.

Q gets it

But you missed the point. It’s a basic logic gate function through premise after premise.

True = 1

False = 0

Resources exist to exploit (capitalism) = 1

Powerful people exist = 1
Powerful people are above mortal or mundane laws in a nation = 1
Powerful people are above international law = 1 look at Blair
Powerful people have similar goals = 1 “international relations”?
Powerful people know one another = likely.

Combine them.
There’s your conspiracy = authority + evil intent to use it.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

You can prove the first part, the second must be deduced.

OT

Medicine is eugenic, transhumanism is dysgenic (undue power, unnatural). Classism goes unmentioned by name. Don’t look at the rich people. No connection to power there. A little moral Communism – for the “greater good” with no good absolute and no greater Godhead. It’s about decreasing independence and increasing the number of dependents, a simple ratio.

Ask simple probability questions and observe reality:

How many cows does the cattle farmer want in future: more, the same or fewer?
What are the odds no rape gang has abused a Jewish child?
How is the economy still running with fewer producers than ever?
What is the plan for population density as food production plummets?

Nootropics and neurotoxins are an existing chemical example. Who gets what?

best comment
Maybe the population should never be this big. When you have this many people alive on earth your basically inviting the smartest of those people to get together and find out a way to conspire against those below them. Forcing their hands into doing things and thinking about things that should never be done. All in the name of damage control. It just seems like a lot.

There is no noblesse oblige and they would resent the parasite load.

They’re locked into their investment (“Human Resources”, the scariest term in the English language) for certain, until they switch over to 100% robots. They’ll keep chopping up those transhumanist-loving chumps until there’s only machine. It reminds me of Hannibal where he’s eating the brain.

No, thanks.

The body is sacred.

We already consume ourselves with the social construct and financial fiction of debt. Debt requires a bondage, homogeneity and has confines e.g. jubilee years.

Power isn’t IQ, that’s what they want you to think because it deters challenge. If you assumed you were gonna lose, you wouldn’t try to rebel. They’d lie about their IQ. I’m getting Assassin’s Creed flashbacks: nothing is true, everything is permitted. OG Fake News meme.

Now, how many people own the media channels?

Is a little paranoia justified upon noticing things?

Transhumanism: tech-eugenics

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2018/02/the-totalitarian-transhumanist-agenda.html

We can’t improve people the obvious ways or they’ll know, so let’s blame technology for our control freak megalomania live-forever delusions!

Individuals are fine, individualism is a cult.

it is the project to alleviate all pain and distress, maximise gratification and fulfillment, abolish ageing and sustain human life indefinitely.

Have you met really, really old people?

They are bored to tears.

You can’t alleviate all pain without making someone numb, distress without making them stupid (the blissful idiot), aging (cell change) will happen if you want memory and there are already too many people on the planet for food demands so unless you plan a 99% style famine, living forever is unwise. Do you want to live through every nuclear war and fall into the sun?

You know what it really is?

They wasted their lives, their youth in hedonism. Now they’re gonna die and being narcissistic, they can’t stand the idea the world might be better off.

Instead of admitting the fault, they assume they can try again like a video game an endless number of times.

They’re staring down the barrel of a gun and trying to make themselves bulletproof.

Mostly Boomers.

You know the type.

The word “consensual” has replaced moral, you don’t need to argue the latter anymore. Something “fun” cannot be wrong! – Bad Boomer logic.

A true repentance shuns the evil itself, more than the external suffering or the shame – Shakespeare

The Reaper is especially pleased to claim these people – alcoholic, druggie, promiscuous wastrels.
The West will be spared as soon as Burning Man is cancelled.

Do you want technology companies to own your body?

There is no property right without bodily first. Otherwise, what owns the property?

If you want to give up your self-ownership for magic beans, there are better forms of slave.

The hubris of assuming they know what your genitals should look like. Trust those people.

The West has too much fake money to spend on this shit.

If the abolition of suffering is the primary goal, it implies the abolition of life – which would be the only way of ensuring that nobody and nothing suffered. Bottom line transhumanism is therefore only one step away from advocating death as prophylaxis.

The techno-Rapture. You die, but you live again, forever! With jet packs!

(instead of wings)

Autistic idiots.

a drugged-euphoric life are all preferable to a conscious and free life insofar as they entail less suffering or more pleasure. Even if such a life led to rapid death, it would be preferable on a purely hedonic calculus.

Hedonism is never worth it, in any true calculation.

They’re already brain dead to even consider this. Any survival instinct is dead.

Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course – Shakespeare

But there is another side to transhumanism; which is the transhumanism that denies itself and operates by deception and dishonesty.

This is the transhumanism of mainstream, modern, almost-ubiquitous totalitarianism – a  transhumanism that aims at omni-surveillance and micro-control of the population.

This transhumanism sells itself as hedonic – as enhancing – but is motivated by the agenda of control. It is the strategic push for intercommunicating ‘smart’ technology, for omnipresent cameras and microphones, a society in which everyone carries a tracking device (smart phone) that monitors their activity to a fine level of discrimination – and seeks always to extend this (artificial ‘intelligence’, self-driving cars, the skies filled with drones…) – and to make it mandatory (microchip implants etc.).

The police state is in your pocket and you paid for it, multiple times.

Phones smarter than the people using them.

Mandatory – mark of the Beast.

e.g. you aren’t allowed to have a sex anymore, women, or at least, let this man in a dress tell you how to be a woman, which is so much better than a Monopoly Man doing it!

The only saving grace?

It won’t work.

They aren’t smart enough to develop technology better than God.

Pride is the first sin.

Transhumanists don’t realise kinship comes from genetics

http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2015/06/should-we-care-if-the-human-race-goes-extinct.html

It’s a little spergy (short-sighted in social order).

I agree, there are lots of great things to point to such as the works of Shakespeare, Mozart, and Grothendieck. We should revere the greatness of the works, however, not the substrate on which the works were created. If what is great about humanity is the great things that we have done then the future may hold greater things yet.

Theseus. Ship.
Normalcy. Bias.

 If we work to pass on our best values and aspirations to our technological progeny then we can be proud of future generations even if they differ from us in some ways.

I like to call these people with no instinct whatsoever “genetic suicides”. It’s accurate and non-PC.

I hope it’s a joke post.