Well done South Park

See this? More like this plz.

We need the media to turn on people like this.

comment

Interesting enough, the Roman Empire, which is arguably the Latin foundation for Western Civilization, considered actors and actresses to be the lowest, dregs of Roman society. Even stable hands were considered more important than actors.

There’s no glamour, there’s only e-celeb cancer.

Nobody should have that level of industry power over another’s body, it’s slavery.

It’s distribution too. If you own Shakespeare, you own Hollywood (LA and Broadway) and London. Shakespeare is the weak point nobody ever points out. If these people didn’t fund plays, the actors wouldn’t give a Razzie. They only do big films to do little films and plays. You can measure the time they care by the ink drying on cheques, backroom deals of tit/s for tat.

Change the funding structure, help the unions, out the abusers of the current one. All connected. Improve transparency and media separation. Ethics in journalism.

I’m currently in multiple online communications on this subject, it touched on a lot of connections. It’s funny, you pick a name out of a hat because it matches a fucking hurricane… suddenly Angie comes forward and everyone else does.

I must admit, I’m having a little too much fun with this one. It’s like dominoes with people, really, if it weren’t in the service of a cause so good I might feel bad at some point.*

How ’bout a detour?

Did you know, there are meditation studies, that if you focus large numbers of people on one end, it’s likelier to happen? Guess what I’ve been doing.

Expose the degenerates.
Weaken the elite.
Empower the poor and innocent.

Naturally, this energy-raising works better with more powerful individuals (you’d need less of them) and a free-flow of energy that is going to waste otherwise e.g. a festival. What do you think most protests are? How about prayers at Church, why is the room different?

The wording is important, no double-negatives e.g. Stop those who aren’t good.
Don’t use it for negative/selfish ends either, doesn’t work or backfires.

Can be used for elections e.g.

Trump wins

Hillary loses.

Opposing ends like that must be conducted on separate occasions, ideally 2 days apart minimum.

BS? Possibly. Fun? Yes.
NO drugs, interferes with purity and alcohol imbibers can only be used as a source of energy not a conduit. Ultimately, God or Jesus or angels are the real ones moving this stuff. No sacrifices. Candles and incense are nice. Healthy snacks are a good idea.
To be clear, you make nothing happen. Your aim is to make something likelier to happen if it’s in accordance with divine will. Yep, that’s a prayer, meditation is also a form of prayer since it connects to something higher/spiritual, look up the definition.

Participation rules: similar time (need not be exact, within 45 minutes overlap), good karma (at least not frequently doing anything immoral especially what you’re opposing), no atheists (useless, if anything a drain) and the stronger the faith of participants (Christian or Christian-friendly), the better the effect. Churches don’t realize what they’ve got. It’s like a nuclear generator of potential. Why else mass prayer on the day of rest and energy replacement?
Avoid fluoride the week before. This includes black tea. Eat the good salt, salt baths, all the salt. Become the salt. You know those salt lamps? Not a bad idea in every corner.

https://www.biblegateway.com/quicksearch/?quicksearch=prayer

I hate to say it, but the Muslims are right on direction being important.
They pray five times a day and they’re the fastest growing religion.

I am fun at parties.

Am I trolling you?

Well, you could just look at my track record, fam.

*jk I never feel bad. It’s the truth.

All the people who say we need new, edgy TV…

I don’t care about GOT anymore, I had a falling out with one of the cast.
Now hearing the theme tune triggers me into a frothy, bloody rage.

Barring an episode where something happens.png, it’s dead to me.

Everyone’s talking about CC and I’m here, pining for Mr Robot.
http://www.denofgeek.com/uk/tv/mr-robot-season-3/43041/mr-robot-prepare-to-see-a-lot-more-of-tyrell-in-season-3
Don’t make me choose between Tyrell and Whiterose.
“Although Mr Robot takes place in an alternate timeline where the fsociety hackers have managed to derail the global economy and cause all manner of havok, Obama will always be the president coping with the fallout, according to the show’s creator Sam Esmail.”
If only they knew.
“The decision as to how long the show stretches out could very well be taken out of the creator’s hands in the future, however, as despite being critically acclaimed and picking up multiple Emmy nominations, Mr Robot’s season 3 renewal was never based on its popularity with general viewers – as the figures have shown – but we’ll definitely see Rami Malek, Christian Slater and the rest of fsociety back on our screens later in the year, for one more season at least.”

Its fault is that it’s too realistic on the IT. It’s basically an IQ test to keep up with the plot.

None of the Fight Club or other such fans of edge are aware of this.

Yes, there’s diverse casting but given the setting it’s realistic.

Also, we need a nude scene with Tyrell’s wife.

For plot reasons.

That should get numbers up nicely.

The Man In the High Castle is SJW-proof

Yesterday it got renewed for a second season.

The SJWs are finally leaving a piece of geek culture alone, because the very premise triggers them and even admitting to watching or liking the show would open them up among their fellow SJWs to accusations of endorsing Nazism so it’s well worth a watch. They can’t even call it bad because it’s been getting rave reviews (likely in response to the SJW control of recent years, this is like a breath of fresh air). By far, the best thing about it is Rufus Sewell as a Nazi officer, that character needs more screen time.

The final episode surprised me.

Sex and the City would never happen irl

I suffered through both films and a few episodes to bring you this revelation. Appreciate its background and my willingness to suffer for the redpill truth. The central premise would never happen. For a point never raised by male commentators.

Women of similar social habits become friends.
Birds of a feather do flock together in reality.

It's a fantasy of social power above sexual power

A slut would never befriend a prude in a meaningful, lasting way. Nor a shopaholic singleton with a devoted mother. A drama queen with a retiring wallflower. Extremes tend to project onto one another. There are few exceptions, that is true, but exceptions prove the rule. SatC is as much a fantasy about Sisterhood, women of all stripes coming together equally, as it is any commentary on what they actually DO once they’re together. (Status-enforcing behaviours, mostly).

You wanna know what really happens when different types of woman get together?

We hate each other. Since women compete socially.

Most of the shit women do is for the benefit of other women

Notice how there’re no women of a different age? Race? Sexuality, really? No male feminists? No gay guys allowed?

It’s a Queen Bee fantasy. Each stereotype is considered powerful “in her own way” (Special Snowflake Siren) and the (stupid) female viewer choosing one to identify with is afforded a secret sense of superiority over the other Girls. Yeah, I’m calling it, this explains the structure of Girls ‘premise’ I read on wikipedia because no way am I suffering through that shit so soon after SatC.