Your deadbeat dad made you short

I ain’t playin’ today.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4697772/
It isn’t muh genetics, it was Daddy’s adultery.
The sins of the father shall be visited etc etc.

If only we were warned in a book of some kind.

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bible-Verses-About-Sins-Of-The-Father/

Men: parental death and divorce during early childhood was associated with shorter adult height, and later puberty. Later puberty was associated with shorter adult height. Path analyses demonstrated that the relationship between parental divorce and height was completely mediated by age at puberty; although parental death was only partially mediated by age at puberty

The wages of sin. Deadbeats may as well be statistically dead. Actually better.

Good luck blaming the Jews for your Dad’s case of the Wandering Penis.

Most common cause of divorce: adultery.

Most common spouse to cheat: male.

Sure, the wife might file but… vitally, after she’s been publicly humiliated. The Bible says to leave if he won’t do his duty.

If their own father is still sexual competition (coughs in Freud) then logically the son’s body would shut down and delay puberty. Manwhore dads kill their son’s chances, since they’re bad parents. Adultery isn’t just spousal abuse, it’s child abuse. So severe, it gets the death penalty of both guilty parties in Christianity. Better an adulterous husband be dead, for his children’s sake. Health outcomes like this prove it.

The Sexual Revolution made you short… and ironically less successful in it.

White people more ill

Guess we deserve all the positive discrimination, according to the last post‘s link.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4619848/
The science is settled. We’re genetically oppressed, hire us, BBC.
Celtic blood is especially prone.
RH-Neg blood is also connected to Ancient Hebrews, choose your opinion wisely.
It could even be a fine test for Jewish pretenders. If you’re one of the original tribe, you won’t mind a glance at your sheet?
Recessive genetics (islands and nomads) are more fragile and deserve special legal status because we don’t want to be anti-science, do we?

According to this proof, the Japanese, Chinese, Korean and Indians merit less positive discrimination than the British, Basque, other European and American.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rh_blood_group_system#Population_data
I guess Mother Nature isn’t a white supremacist. Tell me, where’s the data for immigrant RHF? Does Magic Dirt transform them? Who is needy?

“Rhesus-positive and Rhesus-negative persons differ in the presence-absence of highly immunogenic RhD protein on the erythrocyte membrane. The biological function of the RhD molecule is unknown. Its structure suggests that the molecular complex with RhD protein transports NH3 or CO2 molecules across the erythrocyte cell membrane. Some data indicate that RhD positive and RhD negative subjects differ in their tolerance to certain biological factors, including, Toxoplasma infection, aging and fatique. Present cross sectional study performed on 3,130 subjects) showed that Rhesus negative subjects differed in many indices of their health status, including incidences of many disorders.

Which direction?

Rhesus negative subjects reported to have more frequent allergic, digestive, heart, hematological, immunity, mental health, and neurological problems. On the population level, a Rhesus-negativity-associated burden could be compensated for, for example, by the heterozygote advantage, but for Rhesus negative subjects this burden represents a serious problem.”

Since wikipedia tends to delete certain data once I link, here’s a spare.

Read it and weep.

Race and ill health

Scrambling for nurture excuses, are we?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25526/

Fails to account for IQ, social mobility isn’t equally possible.

The participant with a higher visual acuity gets the pilot position.

Unless they’re seriously suggesting we should dole out positions and their responsibility (legal) on the incompetent? That sounds more like a curse on them.

The simpler explanation (Ockham) is that health impacts the ability to strive and lower IQ causing poorer lifestyle choices compounds the ill health as a permanent feature.

How to truly test this?
Within a race, some castes do poorly and this is both represented in lower IQ scores than their genetic kin as well as “poor” health. Where one caste e.g. Western-living Indians, represents a middle-class (as in the UK), white people are at a distinct disadvantage – disproving and debunking the privileged status hypothesis. So-called “positive discrimination” or reverse racism, leads more opportunities to the class who least deserve it (financially stable) purely on the basis of race (racist).

Race isn’t a qualification. To treat it as any sort of meaningful status opposes the Race Relations Act.

The BBC should’ve been stripped of taxpayer funding the moment it refused to hire white people, the taxpaying majority. As a point of fact, how come they’re allowed to turn a private profit? Isn’t that also a monopoly?

You can’t study class and discrimination without classism but ah! They won’t do that!

Wonder why.

How hard do white natives work to reach a given position, eh?

The question never published nor studied.

Who has it easier? It would be easy to study but I’ve seen nada.

Does meritocracy cease to apply if your skin has a certain level of pigment?

Is this the new coffee-coloured aristocracy? Reign of error.
When you hire someone on the basis of skin colour, you make everyone who looks like them look similarly incompetent. Who’s racist?

Public interest, equality in hiring/promotion/wages and all that.

Favouring one party is a direct oversight spurning the other.

Over-representation is treason. i.e. Should whites govern Africa?

Bias is scientifically proven, ruling over the outgroup impartially is impossible for all races.

Whose interests do they represent in practice? That would prove neutrality, if they also plugged white and poor causes. …No? Have they ever represented the majority …. in a democracy? Anything less is indeed treason.

It comes down to this: who pays the academic’s share of taxes for these divisive papers?

Are the poor working two or more jobs expected to slave away for those who write inciteful documents encouraging their oppression?

Alcohol, DNA mutation and evolution

https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/alcohol/alcohol-fact-sheet

Michael Douglas’ cancer was probably caused by alcohol.

All alcohol causes permanent DNA mutation. Over time it builds up.

Researchers have identified multiple ways that alcohol may increase the risk of cancer, including:

Alcoholic beverages may also contain a variety of carcinogenic contaminants that are introduced during fermentation and production, such as nitrosaminesasbestos fibers, phenols, and hydrocarbons.

Is there a racial difference?

You bet.

Can a person’s genes affect their risk of alcohol-related cancers?

A person’s risk of alcohol-related cancers is influenced by their genes, specifically the genes that encode enzymes involved in metabolizing (breaking down) alcohol (13).

For example, one way the body metabolizes alcohol is through the activity of an enzyme called alcohol dehydrogenase, or ADH. Many individuals of Chinese, Korean, and especially Japanese descent carry a version of the gene for ADH that codes for a “superactive” form of the enzyme. This superactive ADH enzyme speeds the conversion of alcohol (ethanol) to toxic acetaldehyde. As a result, when people who have the superactive enzyme drink alcohol, acetaldehyde builds up. Among people of Japanese descent, those who have this superactive ADH have a higher risk of pancreatic cancer than those with the more common form of ADH (14).

Another enzyme, called aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2), metabolizes toxic acetaldehyde to non-toxic substances. Some people, particularly those of East Asian descent, carry a variant of the gene for ALDH2 that codes for a defective form of the enzyme. In people who have the defective enzyme, acetaldehyde builds up when they drink alcohol. The accumulation of acetaldehyde has such unpleasant effects (including facial flushing and heart palpitations) that most people who have inherited the ALDH2 variant are unable to consume large amounts of alcohol. Therefore, most people with the defective form of ALDH2 have a low risk of developing alcohol-related cancers.

However, some individuals with the defective form of ALDH2 can become tolerant to the unpleasant effects of acetaldehyde and consume large amounts of alcohol. Epidemiologic studies have shown that such individuals have a higher risk of alcohol-related esophageal cancer, as well as of head and neck cancers, than individuals with the fully active enzyme who drink comparable amounts of alcohol (15). These increased risks are seen only among people who carry the ALDH2 variant and drink alcohol—they are not observed in people who carry the variant but do not drink alcohol.

Few epidemiologic studies have looked specifically at the association between red wine consumption and cancer risk in humans.

Veganism is bad for women

TLDR: It is bad for men but increases or worsens the odds/intensity of conditions women are already predisposed to e.g. depression, osteoporosis, cancer.

Yes, there are links to studies and discussions of studies. Keep reading.

One important fact, before we continue:

Veganism isn’t a diet, a diet doesn’t require supplements.

Nobody really mentions that fact.

The only ones that work too, take things that can only be animal-derived, from lesser sources they aren’t processed correctly or absorbed. The biggest sluts are vegan and this is no coincidence, it’s a transference of physical shame. Find me an adult, virgin vegan. Good luck. This is their penance. I’ve mentioned about the purity obsessed brains of the clean eating cult as a scapegoat (pun intended) for abusing their own animal bodies with corrupting influences and toxins (STDs). It’s religion for atheists, they get to feel pure without prayer, they purge (psychologically unhealthy) without giving up the true cause. The guilt isn’t over raping cows, or whatever else, it’s about allowing themselves to be used. There aren’t many married vegans either, are there?
Politically, veganism is motivated by Communism. It reduces production and weakens capitalism. Farmland is still cleared for plants, as covered before, little animals still die. Yes, even the fluffy ones! Economically, as covered before, this frees up the traditional foods we do produce to sell to foreigners e.g. China’s demand for Britain’s meat and dairy produce, with less hostility from the natives for taking the higher bidder. Food prices still rise (even vegetables) because of China, directly.
It’s a lemming lifestyle, like bisexuality a few years ago because Katy Perry wrote a song.

http://drkaayladaniel.com/do-vegetarians-live-longer-dont-count-on-it/

“In reality, the Hunza and Vilcabambans consume some meat and raw dairy, and the Okinawans eat far more pork than soy. What’s more, there’s no anthropological evidence of healthy, happy fruitarians sunning in gardens of eden prior to the hunter gatherer eras.”

It is a modern diet dependent on technology. Without modern farming, they starve.
It’s status signalling too, it’s classist since most of the country cannot afford to spend that much, including shipping.

“Indeed, leading anthropologists present convincing evidence that meat helped us evolve from big bellied, tiny-brained primates to big-brained humans able to leave all-day “grazing” behind and spend the time developing civilization. In other words, eating animal products made us human.
The latest study to debunk the vegan longevity myth comes out of Graz, Austria. Using data from the Austrian Health Interview Series, researchers from the Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology compared omnivores with vegans, ovo-lacto vegetarians and pesco-vegetarians (near vegetarians who consumed some fish, eggs and/or milk) of similar sex, age and socio-economic status. They found the vegetarians suffered from more chronic conditions including allergies, asthma, anxiety, depression, diabetes, migraines, osteoporosis, heart disease and cancer. They had more doctors visits, a higher need for health care, dimmer assessments of their own health, and poorer social relationships.”

Tara McCarthy has always been a twit. You don’t believe in the religious sanctity of life but …conscience? What if a pig just keeled over, if it’s a murder thing, why not eat it? What about lab-grown meat? Twits.

A sexual behaviour study hasn’t been conducted to my knowledge.
I encourage any and all people vaguely left-wing in my acquiantance to give up animal products. Simply by shaming them for non-vegan choices, while they claim to care so much. It works better than overtly telling them.
If you’ve read me on this topic before you’ll know it’s because that causes brain damage. Dietary warfare.
Since it’s a fad diet, when you control for age, the effect disappears. Younger people tend to be healthier on any diet, regardless of what it is.

https://theconversation.com/do-vegetarians-live-longer-probably-but-not-because-theyre-vegetarian-72191

“We followed a total of 267,180 men and women over an average of six years. During the follow-up period, 16,836 participants died. When we compared the risk of early death for vegetarians and non-vegetarians, while controlling for a range of other factors, we did not find any statistical difference.
Put more simply, when we crunched the data we found vegetarians did not have a lower risk of early death compared with their meat-eating counterparts.”
This lack of “survival advantage” among vegetarians, outlined in our paper in Preventive Medicine, does not come as a complete surprise. In 2015, a United Kingdom-based cohort study concluded vegetarians had a similar risk of death from all causes when compared with non-vegetarians. This is contrary to the US-based study findings.”

Evolution says you’re stupid.
American studies are polluted by what passes for the normal diet in your country.

Study here: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743516304479

Vegetarians have modest health benefits across some studies, but it’s small. Veganism? No.

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/vegan-betrayal-the-myths-vs-the-realities-of-a-plants-only-diet/

Not one respected study has ever shown a long-term vegan diet to be healthier than any other, and most research uncovers troubling deficiencies. They claim meat-free diets are healthier, but healthier than what?”
“Yes, it is possible to get adequate nutrition from a vegan diet;”
did you ask a neurobiologist? no, because they say no, I ask…
“but in practice, many vegans don’t. She observes vegans eating huge amounts of carbs and vegan junk foods and skimping on their protein and vitamin needs.”
They still eat junk, with a trendy label. It’s hipster food.
Children (and teens) shouldn’t be on any unusual diet. ANY. It’s abusive, they need to develop.
“Vegans often cite Campbell’s controversial book The China Study (see also here), but the subjects in his study were not vegans and most of them weren’t even vegetarians.”
If they won’t ban the sale of animal products, they’re eating them on the quiet.
“in practice many vegetarians begin to suffer from insidious borderline malnutrition.”
<cheers>

Can we get those numbers up? Those are rookie numbers.
Listen, if they want to pay for worse junk food than a chav to feel superior, paying through the nose and brain-damaging everyone with their politics, how can I deny them their free will to do so? I wouldn’t want to infringe on their rights

“Too-thin vegans are eating animal flesh after all: their own.” Protein starvation leads to self-cannibalization.’
Well, it is natural. That’s the only moral standard. Common in starvation cases, along with psychosis.
I guess the Left is literally eating themselves.

Vegetarians have more mental conditions, which makes sense if you basically put yourself on rations from a food group or three.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3466124/
The neurotics simply claim to care about the animals (unless they’re white, I’m guessing).
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/16/is-veganism-a-mental-disorder/
Freud’s case studies were obsessed with food, not sex.

Why should we study vegan sex lives?
“Meanwhile, vegans’ special affinity for animals also opens the mind to sick possibilities. Princeton University professor Peter Singer, who authored “Animal Liberation” four decades ago, has argued that bestiality may be acceptable if the animal is into it. “Sex with animals does not always involve cruelty,” he writes.”
…There’s public interest.

“The “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders” suggests, “A mental disorder is a syndrome characterized by clinically significant disturbance in an individual’s cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior that reflects a dysfunction in the psychological, biological, or developmental processes underlying mental functioning.” Could veganism fit the bill?”

Yes.

It’s easy to test.

But look at the lies:
http://www.veginout.com/blog/going-vegan-can-improve-both-your-physical-and-mental-health/
Self-report doesn’t count.
Studies on vegetarians mean nothing to veganism, unless it’s about the absence of animal nutrition.
They have more anxiety ‘attacks’, the most recent term for hysteria from neurosis.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/evolutionary-psychiatry/201211/youre-vegetarian-have-you-lost-your-mind

If you really look into it, vegans are trying to cover.
Things you can’t do because they can’t….
http://intentionalwellnessinc.com/health/herpes-vegan-diet/
Their ‘natural’ solution is always supplements.
They know.
http://www.veggieboards.com/forum/57-transitioning-vegetarian/202401-vegetarian-std.html

HPV only became a problem after Tindr but the app isn’t banned for public health.
K.
http://jacknorrisrd.com/herpes-and-the-vegan-diet-update/
No motive.
https://www.govegr.com/blogtoo/sex-why-vegans-do-it-better
No motive at all.
http://ieatgrass.com/2014/04/do-vegans-taste-better/
It isn’t a sexual signal. Nope! Why would slutty women doing yoga be paranoid about that?

What about the Roman diet? Herbs and olive oil? That would work better than any of this. It’s the reason the Italians were famous lovers.
https://www.mindbodygreen.com/0-5590/5-Reasons-Why-Vegans-Have-Better-Sex.html

PETA claim veganism helps impotence.
https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/756989/erectile-dysfunction-cause-treatment-vegan-diet
Men who tried it claim otherwise. The mental health findings alone could be causing it.
Especially since a lot of people wouldn’t date a vegan.

https://greatist.com/live/nsfw-peta-video-vegans-last-longer
I’m sorry, only a slut would be convinced by this. Why appeal to sluts if there’s no connection? It’s a truly selfish diet, since they won’t grow their own food (in which case, fine) then they would have to kill animals as ‘pest control’.

Vegan isn’t a healthy lifestyle. Dairy and meat-eaters can still eat fruit and vegetables. Fuck off?
Tea has flavonoids, so are Brits better in bed than Americans? Are we deserving of being famed lovers now?
The fact the vegans must keep claiming evidence that doesn’t exist once you check shows they know they are unscientific.
There must be another reason.

Veganism is probably just orthorexia.
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2017-10-orthorexia-healthy-sick.html
Many eating disorder people hop ship to veganism and claim it works.
Well, sure, if it’s the same thing rebranded. It would feel right.
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2017-09-vegetarians-susceptible-depression-meat-eaters.html
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2017-12-vegetarian-diets-healththe-voice-science.html
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-03-vegans-lack-essential-nutrient-intake.html
They lie about cholesterol, acting like people cannot have it high and be vegan.
http://www.vegsource.com/sarah-taylor/vegans-with-high-cholesterol.html
Your genes won’t go away.
http://www.yourdailyvegan.com/2013/06/do-i-need-to-worry-about-my-cholesterol-levels-as-a-vegan/
https://www.baumancollege.org/forum/index.php?topic=6314.0
“Since cholesterol only comes from animal products and they have eliminated all animal products, why is their body still producing cholesterol (LDL)?”
The first part is a lie, obviously.
Do they still smoke, do drugs, drink and sleep around? Other bad habits that would impact cholesterol?
http://www.theveganrd.com/2012/05/when-vegans-get-cancer/
When they stop testing only rich people, who buy better food overall, plenty of ‘old’ diseases start affecting the young.
http://jacknorrisrd.com/mortality-rates-of-vegetarians-and-vegans/
Since you need fat for health, and dairy is a prime source (especially for women), your body will age faster too.
http://thenutritionwatchdog.com/do-vegetarians-age-faster/
Show me an old vegan that doesn’t look like a prune.
“In just 4 short years, she not only had gained weight and said she was “famished all the time”, but her skin looked dry, wrinkly, and saggy. Her hair was dull and dry and grew very slowly.”
You can only get collagen from animal products.
Yes, fish counts as an animal (it has meat, it bleeds) but it doesn’t really do well on collagen. You need poultry and red meats.
“Being a vegan can be aging,” says Vargas, a famous New York dermatologist. “I see 27-year-old vegans who don’t have good skin elasticity. There’s no snap-back to their skin because they’re not getting enough protein and collagen.”
“Other anti-aging benefits of collagen include improving gut integrity by enhancing digestive enzyme secretion, and restoring a healthy mucosal lining in the stomach.”
There’s the cause of vegan flatulence. So much for the better smell.
http://notrickszone.com/2014/03/30/university-of-graz-study-finds-that-vegetarians-are-unhealthier-more-mentally-disturbed-than-meat-lovers/#sthash.rcTkpRUL.dpbs
They’re socialists because they’re a burden on the health system.

“the press release states that the results contradict the common cliché that meat-free diets are healthier. Vegetarians have twice as many allergies as big meat-eaters do (30.6% to 16.7%) and they showed 166% higher cancer rates (4.8% to 1.8%). Moreover the scientists found that vegans had a 150% higher rate of heart attacks (1.5% to 0.6%). In total the scientists looked at 18 different chronic illnesses. Compared to the big meat-eaters, vegetarians were hit harder in 14 of the 18 illnesses (78%) which included asthma, diabetes, migraines and osteoporosis”

Many of those things already higher in women.
I’ve tried to keep this post short, it’s an intro to do your own research.

The NY Post can’t be considered right wing.
https://nypost.com/2015/11/04/my-vegan-diet-almost-killed-me/
You need fermented foods for your gut, look it up.

Collagen deficits also reduce your orgasm potential, ladies.
https://nypost.com/2018/01/14/bride-says-orgasm-shot-before-the-big-day-saved-her-sex-life/
I assume it would also apply to men?

What would genetics experiments look like?

short and sweet

On the population level?

Well, you’d need to target things everyone needs.

Things they can’t avoid.

Water.

Food.

Air.

Medicine.

Metal and plastic products (99% handled easily).

Mechanism?

Insertional Mutagenesis.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3602164/

A very bad thing.

When not found in the parents, it cannot be germline although it can affect the organism’s own germline i.e. infertility is a common side effect of various radiation and poison cases. Those are written up as reactions.

It cannot be germline, it cannot be genetic, it must be environmental.

It’s written up as a de novo mutation.

Sure, blame Darwin. Don’t look at behaviours and treatments and consumer choices.

You’d also need to weaken the host immune system and ideally keep it busy turning on itself with some sort of auto-immune condition, requiring more medicine.

Ingredients to weaken include;

lead – in everything from lipstick and baby toys

mercury and aluminium and fluoride – neurotoxins present in vaccines, the water supply and many foods with zero nutritional value

despite the green and organic movements, there is no effort made to clean them.

Could this perhaps be because the insertion is deliberate?

Then you move onto various ‘green’ projects that test the atmosphere by pumping a bunch of stuff into it.

Sounds fine.

Don’t be paranoid.

‘Heavy metals’ build up in the body. They are hardly excreted. Cleanses target these to return to what is the prior norm, but they aren’t completely effective.

Then the hard sell

GMO food.

Non-food food.

Artificial food.

Fake food.

Margarine turned out so well.

None of this sounds familiar.

None of this adds up.

Guides on how to avoid?

https://veganproductguide.com/

http://www.ewg.org/skindeep/

They exist, look around.

Follow the hippies.

Listen to the GOOPies.

It’s funny how there are people who care more about racial purity than the literal purity of their genome. I don’t think nootropics are gonna help on this one.