I don’t recall the Nazis ever doing this.
“Your body your choice” is sound libertarian logic.
However, once born, it isn’t in your body anymore.
(And different races have different gestation times, Africans are the shortest).
If an infant is viable externally, even on machines (the date gets lower as technology improves) the abortion becomes evil. If these people were intellectually honest, argued in good faith and had any interest in morality beyond their selfish desires.
Big Pharma buys and sells body parts. Buy from the hospital, the parents donate it for free or it goes missing, claiming it’s been cremated. They sell the parts online to “researchers”.
As covered and previously linked also, they can use aborted tissue and circumcised foreskin tissues in some dermal fillers.
We live in an era of happy infanticide and parental “rights” for rapists.
How progressive…ly insane.
This is why lawyers go first.
nb (Early abortion always existed historically in rape cases, we don’t mean those. You consented to the sex, you knew babymaking could result in a baby or you’d have done oral).
too much discussion of dollar, insufficient on the petro- part.
Especially threats to.
“Those who watch closely will notice that even small changes in the laws and rules can have a big impact on how things unfold. A lot of strange almost bizarre theories are floating around concerning our economic future. This means that on occasion it is wise to step back, take a deep breath, then try to sort out what is really happening in the economy.”
“Central banks can stack the deck but when it gets too high and begins to fall they may not be able to control the direction or who it will crush. Many of the investments people make are predicated on the idea that if the economy fails we will have a soft-landing, or if it does crash the result will not be fatal.”
If you’re stupid, yeah. We have socialist schools so we hate the markets and know they’re always doomed to crash. It’s the one useful thing we’re taught. We had to discuss hyperinflation and the crash of ’29 at length.
“The idea the economy will simply be able to adjust and grow its way out of many problems we have tried so hard to ignore and not just muddle along but to thrive defies what history has taught us. It is based on a view of history that often overlooks the many who have “lost it all” in prior periods of economic chaos.”
He speaks like they don’t deserve to burn.
You play with fire.
Worst, you play with someone else’s fire.
Someone’s retirement fire.
A nation’s fire.
I’m sure there’s a myth about this somewhere. The punishment was eternal.
“Is the typical Apple user so self-centered that they just don’t care, or do they lust for the product so much that they bury and ignore their social conscience? These consumers are even willing to pay higher prices to lock themselves into a closed system tightly controlled by Apple.”
I know a man who uses an iPhone and has done public work against child slavery. You might have seen him on TV at some point. I mention this because trust me, that doesn’t narrow it down. Whatsoever.
It is impossible to hold a conversation on this topic. Otherwise an intelligent fellow, he mumbles and points the finger.
What dystopian relief films like Fight Club miss is how most of the people in the system and in the Matrix are complicit, knowingly and willingly so. They are objectively terrible.
When they complain about losing their ill-gotten savings, remember it’s the honest people who really paid for it in the first place. You can’t consume things you don’t produce, it’s a law of nature. If you are consuming beyond your real production (easy jobs don’t count) then someone else has been slaving away for your luxuries and if you lose them, that is justice, not an injustice. These people remind me of the entitlement of a baby who throws away its rattle (iPhone models) expecting it will always be replaced by a caretaker.
“Those who surrender to the idea America is too small to lead based on population numbers do not understand that quality beats quantity hands down. Sadly the spirit of, “I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today” is alive and well in many of those advocating free trade and the expansion of globalism. Whether driven by greed or suffering from being short-sighted, buyers of the many products we import each year should resist giving up their futures so that we can buy the latest fancy flat screen television or set of patio furniture made in China for far less than one made in America. Countries that export goods at slightly below cost in exchange for manufacturing jobs are not stupid – they are predatory and we in America are their prey.”
Globalization isn’t free, it’s treasonous. If you want to develop another country, move there.
They don’t think it’s their future. They, the middles, aren’t the working class. They don’t care. Nobody has to care about them, then? Excellent.
All y’all need to read After the Empire: The Breakdown of the American Order.
Empires collapse, they do not slide.
Trump is an overt paper tiger to match the nation’s own power.
Very good blog.
“civilizations share a sharp curve of decline. Remember this is totally entwined with the economy and everyday life. Indeed, a society’s demise may begin only a decade or two after it reaches its peak population, wealth, and power.”
You had to import the Chinese, didn’t you? The Muslims are nothing to the Red Dragon. Muslims aren’t taking the University places on your prestigious national STEM courses and taking all that knowledge back home with them, to compete against you.
America used to be smarter.
“Uncle Sam introduces Eastern Barbarism to Western civilization.” You don’t see many white women making kitten-crushing videos.
“It was repealed by the Magnuson Act on December 17, 1943.”
“While the Magnuson Act overturned the discriminatory Chinese Exclusion Act, it only allowed a national quota of 105 Chinese immigrants per year, and did not repeal the restrictions on immigration from the other Asian countries. Large scale Chinese immigration did not occur until the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.”
I hate it when I know American history better than Americans.
Sure, blame Africa. Like all the abortions of AAs have given them powerful numbers to swarm you.
“They were charged with living together “in a state of adultery or fornication” and both sentenced to two years imprisonment in the state penitentiary in 1882.”
Those were the days.
Would SJWs really be a problem if being a massive slag (male/female) were illegal again?
You want to go back America? Want to be conservative? Are you sure you want these laws back?
Gee, why were marriages so secure, back in the days you could literally throw cheating spouses in prison?
Asians counted under miscegenation law until 1948. Pick your poison.
“Even today, although all its constituent sections have long been repealed, Chapter 7 of Title 8 of the United States Code is headed “Exclusion of Chinese.” It is the only chapter of the 15 chapters in Title 8 (Aliens and Nationality) that is completely focused on a specific nationality or ethnic group.”
There’s a reason for that. The first isolated communities that refused to integrate were called Chinatown.
All the much ado about Muslim bigotry has precedent in the American law for the Chinese so yes, they are right in that you can’t allow the Chinese to do something then complain when other Asians pull the same con job.
The Chinese had gangs long before the Muslims too.
“One common thread and sign the end is near is a massive growth in crony capitalism and corruption. Even when the signs of decline may be everywhere that does not guarantee the end is near. As the foundation crumbles away it is not uncommon for those in power to extend their rule by many tricks and changing the rules in order to gain a new lease on life.”
A title of ‘stock fuckers’ sounded too vague in this economy.
“The way to get paid the most in the shortest period of time is to convince government to artificially increase stock prices.”
~coughs in Tesla shares~
“The long term on this is the destruction of the entire economy. Why? Put the rich on welfare and they become lazy – just like the poor.”
The Valley is full of Ivy League douches making a quick buck off the taxpayer, there are no geniuses anymore.
There’s no such thing as Tech unicorns. All the engineers who founded it leave, what happens? They buy an island next to Branson, is the value of the company greater, like the IPO price led you to believe?
There are no geniuses.
Technology won’t come riding in on a white horse to save you. You need geniuses and a level of selfless work ethic over years with definite high-risk and remote, but possible high-reward. Well, we got the second, where’s the first?
Tech could never fix humanity’s problems anyway, whatever atheistkult led you to think.
There have been no true innovations out of America since you let Asia steal your upgrades by funding their factories to do so. No coincidence. It’s like international tech communism. Americans do all the work, China rips it off. To each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
But sure, America is the global superpower…. keep telling yourself that.
Even Tesla and Space X, who I mock with love, didn’t patent certain things because they knew China would use it as an ‘instruction manual’. That’s the canary in the coalmine right, there, from people who freed certain patents. The reason we have those and trademarks and such is so a company can run without the competition stealing its shit. So the company lives and to retain its earned advantage. Globalization has ruined entrepreneurship, if the big companies don’t rip you off, hundreds of small ones will try as if they lived down the road (worldwide shipping). Your Government won’t protect the IP of its people, then wonders why real growth tanks….
That, in short, is why another Apple is impossible.
Property rights in a high-tech society must extend to IP or why bother setting up a tech company? Why cure cancer if you’ll lose billions testing it because Asia will just steal the formula?
Do you want me to link these types of studies? To me, it’s one click away but apparently many of you struggle to find them.
– The purpose of this paper is to study ethics, values and cross-cultural differences in China, Mexico or the United States. Three distinct and unique nations, the USA, Mexico and China, have different political structures, historical backgrounds and economical systems. While each of these nations can be considered an integral part to the world economy, each nation has their own distinct ethics, values and culture which serve as the backbone of the particular region. To be successful in international business, knowledgeable as an expatriate and culturally or ethically aware of key nations in the global market, individuals need to have researched information pertaining to the ethics, cultures and values of the USA, Mexico or China to blend in and succeed with the foreign cultural environment.”
PDF is available to view.
Business articles on cross-cultural differences tend to have fewer paywalls.
These are not my ideas, they’ve been openly predicted for a long time.
The brilliant way I heard someone else put it was “they’ve managed to defeat America without a single shot being fired, because the Achilles’ heel of America is its credit card.”
I differ on one point: the West is already turning nasty to the mere idea of its dominance being challenged. I don’t think white people are the type to supplicate and accept second-class status among the people they donated to a ton of charities to help overtake them. The people who typically score lower on IQ tests, there are plenty of national IQ lists to prove it. How many of you would happily work for a stupid boss, compared to yourself?
p.s. ho ho ho