The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein disrupts the cooperative function of human cardiac pericytes – endothelial cells through CD147 receptor-mediated signalling: a potential non-infective mechanism of COVID-19 microvascular disease
paper DECEMBER 2020
AKA they KNEW
(they knew and they pushed it on you – and your kids, soon!)
Findings We show, for the first time, that the recombinant S protein alone elicits functional alterations in cardiac PCs. This was documented as: (1) increased migration, (2) reduced ability to support EC network formation on Matrigel, (3) secretion of pro-inflammatory molecules typically involved in the cytokine storm, and (4) production of pro-apoptotic factors responsible for EC death. Furthermore, the S protein stimulates the phosphorylation/activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) through the CD147 receptor, but not ACE2, in cardiac PCs.
Accordingly, the neutralization of CD147, using a blocking antibody, prevented the activation of ERK1/2 and partially rescued the PC function in the presence of the S protein.
SO do they permit this treatment to their loyal pets?
I think you’ll find the storms fully operational by the time flu season arrives. AKA Coof Coof Part Two. Satanist humour is killing everyone scared enough of death to get guinea pigged. Great way to sort wheat from chaff actually.
Interpretation Our findings suggest the new, intriguing hypothesis that the S protein may elicit vascular cell dysfunction, potentially amplifying, or perpetuating, the damage caused by the whole coronavirus. This mechanism may have clinical and therapeutic implication.
Where is the evidence that viruses cause disease? I have been asking for almost 12 months now, and no one has been able to provide me with a single peer reviewed journal article showing an isolated virus causes disease. It should be so easy to look through the literature and find a study in a couple of minutes, yet no one seems to be able to do such a thing.Scientists and doctors have already done countless experiments to try and prove germ theory over the course of 120+ years, and all have failed….
In March of 1919 Rosenau & Keegan conducted 9 separate experiments in a group of 49 healthy men, to prove contagion. In all 9 experiments, 0/49 men became sick after being exposed to sick people or the bodily fluids of sick people. https://jamanetwork.com/jour…/jama/article-abstract/221687
In November 1919, 8 separate experiments were conducted by Rosenau et al. in a group of 62 men trying to prove that influenza is contagious and causes disease. In all 8 experiments, 0/62 men became sick. Another set of 8 experiments were undertaken in December of 1919 by McCoy et al. in 50 men to try and prove contagion. Once again, all 8 experiments failed to prove people with influenza, or their bodily fluids cause illness. 0/50 men became sick. In 1919, Wahl et al. conducted 3 separate experiments to infect 6 healthy men with influenza by exposing them to mucous secretions and lung tissue from sick people. 0/6 men contracted influenza in any of the three studies. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30082102?seq=1…
In 1920, Schmidt et al conducted two controlled experiments, exposing healthy people to the bodily fluids of sick people. Of 196 people exposed to the mucous secretions of sick people, 21 (10.7%) developed colds and three developed grippe (1.5%). In the second group, of the 84 healthy people exposed to mucous secretions of sick people, five developed grippe (5.9%) and four colds (4.7%). Of forty-three controls who had been inoculated with sterile physiological salt solutions eight (18.6%) developed colds. A higher percentage of people got sick after being exposed to saline compared to those being exposed to the “virus”. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869857/https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/102609951
In 1921, Williams et al. tried to experimentally infect 45 healthy men with the common cold and influenza, by exposing them to mucous secretions from sick people. 0/45 became ill. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869857/
In 1924, Robertson & Groves exposed 100 healthy individuals to the bodily secretions from 16 different people suffering from influenza. The authors concluded that 0/100 became sick as a result of being exposed to the bodily secretions. https://academic.oup.com/…/article…/34/4/400/832936…
In 1930, Dochez et al. attempted to infect a group of men experimentally with the common cold. The authors stated in their results, something that is nothing short of amazing. “It was apparent very early that this individual was more or less unreliable and from the start it was possible to keep him in the dark regarding our procedure. He had inconspicuous symptoms after his test injection of sterile broth and no more striking results from the cold filtrate, until an assistant, on the second day after injection, inadvertently referred to this failure to contract a cold. That evening and night the subject reported severe symptomatology, including sneezing, cough, sore throat and stuffiness in the nose.
The next morning he was told that he had been misinformed in regard to the nature of the filtrate and his symptoms subsided within the hour. It is important to note that there was an entire absence of objective pathological changes”. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869798/
Addendum: One question that frequently comes up is the old story of giving ‘infected blankets’ to the Native Americans to kill them. This story is a cover-up for the real killer which was again allopathic medicine and their vaccines. The proof is in plain sight as always. They vaccinated them. They got sick from the poisoning and died.
“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. The onus is on those making the claims that viruses exist to prove they exist. I just finished reading all the books of Charles Fort where we get the word ‘Fortean’ from and he wrote this about germ theory. Keep in mind Governments have known for over 200 years that the germ theory is false: “Of all germ-distributors, the most notorious was Dr Arthur W. Waite, who, in theyear 1916, was an embarrassment to medical science. In his bacteriological laboratory, he had billions of germs. Waite planned to kill his father-in-law, John E. Peck, 435 Riverside Drive, New York City. He fed the old man germs of Diptheria, but got no results. He induced Peck to use a nasal spray, in which he had planted colonies of the germs of tuberculosis. Not a cough. He fed the old man calomel, to weaken hisresistance. He turned loose hordes of germs of typhoid, and then influenza. Indesperation, he lost all standing in the annals of distinctive crimes, and went common, or used arsenic. The old-fashioned method was a success. One’s impression is that, if anything, diets and inhalations of germs may be healthful.” Charles Fort
December 7th 1994 Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel, Greensboro, N.C., Dr Willner (a medical doctor of 40 years experience) an outspoken whistleblower of the AIDS hoax. In front of a gathering of about 30 alternative-medicine practitioners and several journalists, Willner stuck a needle in the finger of Andres, 27, a Fort Lauderdale student who says he has tested positive for HIV. Then, wincing, the 65-year-old doctor stuck himself. In 1993, Dr. Willner stunned Spain by inoculating himself with the blood of Pedro Tocino, an HIV positive hemophiliac. This demonstration of devotion to the truth and the Hippocratic Oath he took, nearly 40 years before, was reported on the front page of every major newspaper in Spain. His appearance on Spain’s most popular television show envoked a 4 to 1 response by the viewing audience in favor of his position against the “AIDS hypothesis.” When asked why he would put his life on the line to make a point, Dr. Willner replied: “I do this to put a stop to the greatest murderous fraud in medical history. By injecting myself with HIV positive blood, I am proving the point as Dr. Walter Reed did to prove the truth about yellow fever. In this way it is my hope to expose the truth about HIV in the interest of all mankind.” He tested negative multiple times. He died of a Heart attack 4 months later 15th April 1995 (yeh right, funny how these naysayers all die suddenly.) – note: people like Princess Di KNEW they weren’t contagious
1056 (d) The State Health Officer, upon declaration of a public 1057 health emergency, may take actions that are necessary to protect 1058 the public health. Such actions include, but are not limited to:
page 38 on doc
1097 4. Ordering an individual to be examined, tested, 1098 vaccinated, treated, isolated, or quarantined for communicable 1099 diseases that have significant morbidity or mortality and 1100 present a severe danger to public health. Individuals who are 1101 unable or unwilling to be examined, tested, vaccinated, or 1102 treated for reasons of health, religion, or conscience may be
But it doesn’t prevent transmission, the NHS ADMITS it’s non-neutralizing, non-sterilizing. You can still pass it on, that changes nothing. This is an admission the Stab does NOTHING.
It’s insanity, the poorest of logic:
My mask doesn’t work unless you wear a mask.
My vaccine doesn’t work unless you get a vaccine.
Occam: THEY DON’T WORK, THEY NEVER DID.
I told you herd immunity is a myth. If you insist on 100% uptake, there is nobody to ‘protect’ and vitally, no control group to show them up for legal reasons.
1103 subjected to isolation or quarantine. 1104 a. Examination, testing, vaccination, or treatment may be 1105 performed by any qualified person authorized by the State Health 1106 Officer. 1107 b. If the individual poses a danger to the public health, 1108 the State Health Officer may subject the individual to isolation 1109 or quarantine. If there is no practical method to isolate or 1110 quarantine the individual, the State Health Officer may use any 1111 means necessary to vaccinate or treat the individual.
LAND OF THE FREE HUH?
At least they admit ‘vaccination’ is distinct from treatment. It treats nothing.
Authorised by the person Just Following Orders!
How are they gonna pass that here, apart from the already linked blame game conspiracy of Jabbed Dead caused by Normies? Rather than the thunderingly obvious explanation a la Occam it was the common denominator the Stabbing.
They claim to have nabbed 81% of adults here last I heard, why not stop? Didn’t America want 70% for so called herd immunity by artificiality (impossible)? At what point do they dial back? 100%. It’s about the domestic ID to take a piss in a public toilet.
Meanwhile, UK reached herd immunity the natural real way in APRIL. The papers also admitted this but proceeded to gloss over it.
1112 c. Any order of the State Health Officer given to 1113 effectuate this paragraph is shall be immediately enforceable by 1114 a law enforcement officer under s. 381.0012.
MUH MILITARY. People forget they can legally enforce the law on duty.
Except as otherwise expressly provided in this 1191 act, this act shall take effect July 1, 2021.
Amid fears a sizeable proportion of the population are still sceptical of getting the Covid vaccine, those who have so far turned down the chance to get inoculated may soon get a knock on the door to find out why.
SHOVE YOUR DEATH LOTTO UP YOUR BACKSIDE.
And Boomers wonder why we never answer the door.
Door-to-door services have had some success during the pandemic with contact tracers and testers deployed to reach those who authorities have been unable to contact via other means.
No, they’re intimidating people. Legally, it’s intimidation. They chose to ignore you.
Mr Zahawi has declined to say whether the Government is recording data on everyone who has so far refused the vaccine.
so far? try always
Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme yesterday, he confirmed that everybody who had had the vaccine went into the national immunisation vaccination system.
Remember this. DIY Pandemic since the natural route failed. So the only asymptomatic cases possible are the jabbed.
“There are two main types of immunity you can achieve with vaccines. One is so-called “effective” immunity, which can prevent a pathogen from causing serious disease, but can’t stop it from entering the body or making more copies of itself. The other is “sterilising immunity”, which can thwart infections entirely, and even prevent asymptomatic cases. The latter is the aspiration of all vaccine research, but surprisingly rarely achieved.”
Asymptomatic isn’t how the natural immune response works. Yeadon covered this.
They’ll have no excuse come autumn. 6/7 covered definitely qualifies as nationally covered. Either it protects the stabbed or, as evidence suggests, it’s more fatal to them due to ADE. That counts as a jab reaction.
I was in a class once and a bleeding heart asked why we used so many animal models. The professor rounded on her and asked Would you rather we kill your relatives instead? Shut her right up. I think about this a lot.
It was a biology class. He also went into a short burst of a lecture on longitudinal effects.
If they actually got even 60% (which they admit is basically mostly white people) then bye bye native population. I hope to God I’m wrong. Alas, the trajectory of the data by reaction gets worse by the day. Maybe this was a punishment for Brexit, would explain Boris.
I’m not sure I want to see what the world looks like, after this horror.
Given the potential for adverse effects, potentially fatal ones, it is completely inappropriate and unacceptable that EMA permits these products, which hold only emergency use authorisations, to be administered to younger (<60y) people who are healthy, as they are at unmeasurable risks from SARS-CoV-2.
Of equal importance, you are bound by duty to investigate whether reasons exist for the waves of deaths that have occurred following “vaccination” of elderly residents in care and senior homes. Or are you asserting that dangers of “vaccine”-derived thrombotic events are limited to younger individuals? If not, restricting their use solely in one age group — as decided upon in Germany — equates with nothing less than monstrous, condoned genocide of the other.
In closing, failure to inform “vaccine” recipients of the risks and negligible benefits outlined here represents serious violations of medical ethics and citizens’ medical rights. Those violations are especially grave as all the risks we describe can be expected to increase with each re-vaccination, and each intervening coronavirus exposure. This renders both repeated vaccination and common coronaviruses dangerous to young and healthy age groups, for whom — in the absence of “vaccination” — COVID-19 poses no substantive risk.
Misleading populations into accepting investigational agents such as the gene-based COVID-19 “vaccines”, or coercing them through “vaccine passports”, constitutes clear and egregious violations of the Nuremberg Code. The Nuremberg Code mandates voluntary informed consent “without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit [or] duress”. https://history.nih.gov/display/history/Nuremberg+Code
Researchers at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School are reporting the first instance of COVID-19 triggering a rare recurrence of potentially serious blood clots in people’s arms.
“The patient presented to his primary care physician with complaints of swelling in his left arm and was sent to the hospital for further management where he was diagnosed with an upper arm blood clot and an asymptomatic COVID-19 infection,” said Payal Parikh, an assistant professor of medicine at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, who led the study along with Martin Blaser, director of the Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine and a professor at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School. “While his oxygen levels were not diminished, he was hospitalized for the management of the upper extremity deep vein blood clot. Often, blood clots are preceded by chronic inflammatory conditions exacerbated by immobility, and rarely do they occur in patients who are otherwise healthy and active at baseline.”
Asymptomatic is medically biologically impossible.
Key question: had he received any injections to either arm in the past…, year?
If not, they’d say no.
Most cases of deep vein thrombosis occur in the legs. Only about 10 percent of blood clots occur in the arms and of those cases only 9 percent recur. – so it’s rare but don’t ask questions? How scientific.
see section 31 They’ll blame children, independent thinkers and vaccine failure. It’s gene therapy, failure doesn’t happen. Population immunity is based on natural exposure and has never had anything to do with vaccines. Ever. In a century plus of biology. Over a year of exposure, we’re already immune naturally.
section 32 most of the Third Wave dead will be the fully vaccinated go ahead, check 70% of deaths, they say
deaths “larger than peak” from Jan 2021 warned in section 35
section 56 quote “vaccinated, but, nevertheless, not protected against death” that’s how stupid they are, stupid and malicious and under-50 deaths were minimal, under-60s a little higher, over-70s the only group at-risk, if you remember back to last year, which already feels like a century
They go on “This is NOT the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high”. That makes zero logical sense, either it protects you in reality or doesn’t. The map is not the territory, your model isn’t real.
If it doesn’t work, it doesn’t work. Then by definition, it’s ineffective. The purpose of uptake was prevention, which relies on effectiveness. They’re connected variables, idiot.
Look at the death charts on the right of page 18. The more vaccine, the more death.
I SEE SEAS OF BLUE, YOU CAN HAVE THEM TOO, A GENE THERAPY FOR ME, A GENE THERAPY FOR YOU, AND I THINK TO MYSELF, THIS IS BILL GATES’ WORLD, YES I THINK TO MYSELF, THIS IS BILL GATES’ WORLD…
section 60 is a ray of sunshine
“The widespread transmission of a variant that circumvents vaccine induced and naturally acquired immunity is a realistic possibility.” amusing of you to lump them in
“a large section of the population would be susceptible, whether they’ve been vaccinated or not”
“models here used assume….” a lot of shit, frankly, a lot of bullshit
The models used here assume that the effectiveness of vaccines remains high and they do not consider the impact of new variants of concern. < – neither has been proven, not even a little bit
“62 If a variant of concern were to reduce vaccine effectiveness against severe disease and death” Yes, death would be an unfortunate side effect….
63 “next generation of vaccines” forever and ever, medical martial law
“64 new vaccines will be required in the medium term” thin end of a wedge, this is “preparation for this REQUIREMENT…..”
66 waning immunity “optimistic assumption” no shit?
Appendix 2 lists, among other things, “vaccine reduction in risk of death” pretty sure it’s still 100% guys
A cheeky footnote reads “16 Very low, low and higher efficacy assumptions for Warwick are based on weighted averages of the two vaccines (30% PF, 70% AZ)” A third effective? Are you joking? And that was the average so the true range went lower. Note: always check the footnotes, they always hide shit in the footnotes. Nobody ever reads the footnotes, except for me. Because I’m often the cheeky little shit hiding things in them.
It’s strange how Asian areas of the UK are getting ‘new variants’ and ‘outbreaks’ when they have the largest numbers of doctors, who were among the earliest to get the gene therapy…..
Keywords: cytokine storm, live shedding, mortality rates per age group for nation.
If your employer is forcing you to obtain a medical treatment, have them sign paperwork making them financially responsible for all your medical treatments as a result of any and all damage from the experiment. They’ll change their tune. Medical segregation is also super illegal.
1995 evidence of precedent for deceptive vector of transmission, official contamination reportage and hence, UN contravention of genocide law established in the 1940s, section (d) and (c):
“PIP: A priest, president of Human Life International (HLI) based in Maryland, has asked Congress to investigate reports of women in some developing countries unknowingly receiving a tetanus vaccine laced with the anti-fertility drug human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). If it is true, he wants Congress to publicly condemn the mass vaccinations and to cut off funding to UN agencies and other involved organizations. The natural hormone hCG is needed to maintain pregnancy. The hormone would produce antibodies against hCG to prevent pregnancy. In the fall of 1994, the Pro Life Committee of Mexico was suspicious of the protocols for the tetanus toxoid campaign because they excludedallmalesandchildren and called for multipleinjections of the vaccine in onlywomenofreproductiveage. Yet, one injection provides protection for at least 10 years. The Committee had vials of the tetanus vaccine analyzed for hCG. It informed HLI about the tetanus toxoid vaccine. HLI then told its World Council members and HLI affiliates in more than 60 countries. Similar tetanus vaccines laced with hCG have been uncovered in the Philippines and in Nicaragua. In addition to the World Health Organization (WHO), other organizations involved in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine using hCG include the UNPopulationFund, the UN Development Programme, the World Bank, the PopulationCouncil, the RockefellerFoundation, the US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, and Uppsala, Helsinki, and Ohio State universities. The priest objects that, if indeed the purpose of the mass vaccinations is to prevent pregnancies, women are uninformed, unsuspecting, and unconsenting victims.”
“Vaccines are under development for the control of fertility in males and females. This review discusses developments in anti-fertility vaccines at the National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India. A single injection procedure for the sterilization or castration of male animals depending on the site at which the injection is given, has passed through fieldtesting and is expected to be on the market in the nearfuture. Vaccines inducing antibodiesagainstthehuman chorionic gonadotropin have gone through phase I trials with satisfactoryresults. A vaccine producing a consistentlybioeffectiveantibody response against gonadotropin-releasing hormone is ready for phase I/II clinical trials in patients of carcinoma of prostate after due experimentation in animals and toxicology studies. Research to identify sperm antigens for incorporation into second generation vaccines is in progress.”
Control, like farm animals. Single injection for castration of male animals possible.
Look forward to the “drop of testosterone levels”. At least you got to drink some bitch tits beer with the ‘boys’. Don’t come crying to me. You wanted to be ‘male animals’.