Researchers at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School are reporting the first instance of COVID-19 triggering a rare recurrence of potentially serious blood clots in people’s arms.
“The patient presented to his primary care physician with complaints of swelling in his left arm and was sent to the hospital for further management where he was diagnosed with an upper arm blood clot and an asymptomatic COVID-19 infection,” said Payal Parikh, an assistant professor of medicine at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, who led the study along with Martin Blaser, director of the Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine and a professor at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School. “While his oxygen levels were not diminished, he was hospitalized for the management of the upper extremity deep vein blood clot. Often, blood clots are preceded by chronic inflammatory conditions exacerbated by immobility, and rarely do they occur in patients who are otherwise healthy and active at baseline.”
Asymptomatic is medically biologically impossible.
Key question: had he received any injections to either arm in the past…, year?
If not, they’d say no.
Most cases of deep vein thrombosis occur in the legs. Only about 10 percent of blood clots occur in the arms and of those cases only 9 percent recur. – so it’s rare but don’t ask questions? How scientific.
see section 31 They’ll blame children, independent thinkers and vaccine failure. It’s gene therapy, failure doesn’t happen. Population immunity is based on natural exposure and has never had anything to do with vaccines. Ever. In a century plus of biology. Over a year of exposure, we’re already immune naturally.
section 32 most of the Third Wave dead will be the fully vaccinated go ahead, check 70% of deaths, they say
deaths “larger than peak” from Jan 2021 warned in section 35
section 56 quote “vaccinated, but, nevertheless, not protected against death” that’s how stupid they are, stupid and malicious and under-50 deaths were minimal, under-60s a little higher, over-70s the only group at-risk, if you remember back to last year, which already feels like a century
They go on “This is NOT the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high”. That makes zero logical sense, either it protects you in reality or doesn’t. The map is not the territory, your model isn’t real.
If it doesn’t work, it doesn’t work. Then by definition, it’s ineffective. The purpose of uptake was prevention, which relies on effectiveness. They’re connected variables, idiot.
Look at the death charts on the right of page 18. The more vaccine, the more death.
I SEE SEAS OF BLUE, YOU CAN HAVE THEM TOO, A GENE THERAPY FOR ME, A GENE THERAPY FOR YOU, AND I THINK TO MYSELF, THIS IS BILL GATES’ WORLD, YES I THINK TO MYSELF, THIS IS BILL GATES’ WORLD…
section 60 is a ray of sunshine
“The widespread transmission of a variant that circumvents vaccine induced and naturally acquired immunity is a realistic possibility.” amusing of you to lump them in
“a large section of the population would be susceptible, whether they’ve been vaccinated or not”
“models here used assume….” a lot of shit, frankly, a lot of bullshit
The models used here assume that the effectiveness of vaccines remains high and they do not consider the impact of new variants of concern. < – neither has been proven, not even a little bit
“62 If a variant of concern were to reduce vaccine effectiveness against severe disease and death” Yes, death would be an unfortunate side effect….
63 “next generation of vaccines” forever and ever, medical martial law
“64 new vaccines will be required in the medium term” thin end of a wedge, this is “preparation for this REQUIREMENT…..”
66 waning immunity “optimistic assumption” no shit?
Appendix 2 lists, among other things, “vaccine reduction in risk of death” pretty sure it’s still 100% guys
A cheeky footnote reads “16 Very low, low and higher efficacy assumptions for Warwick are based on weighted averages of the two vaccines (30% PF, 70% AZ)” A third effective? Are you joking? And that was the average so the true range went lower. Note: always check the footnotes, they always hide shit in the footnotes. Nobody ever reads the footnotes, except for me. Because I’m often the cheeky little shit hiding things in them.
It’s strange how Asian areas of the UK are getting ‘new variants’ and ‘outbreaks’ when they have the largest numbers of doctors, who were among the earliest to get the gene therapy…..
Keywords: cytokine storm, live shedding, mortality rates per age group for nation.
If your employer is forcing you to obtain a medical treatment, have them sign paperwork making them financially responsible for all your medical treatments as a result of any and all damage from the experiment. They’ll change their tune. Medical segregation is also super illegal.
1995 evidence of precedent for deceptive vector of transmission, official contamination reportage and hence, UN contravention of genocide law established in the 1940s, section (d) and (c):
“PIP: A priest, president of Human Life International (HLI) based in Maryland, has asked Congress to investigate reports of women in some developing countries unknowingly receiving a tetanus vaccine laced with the anti-fertility drug human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). If it is true, he wants Congress to publicly condemn the mass vaccinations and to cut off funding to UN agencies and other involved organizations. The natural hormone hCG is needed to maintain pregnancy. The hormone would produce antibodies against hCG to prevent pregnancy. In the fall of 1994, the Pro Life Committee of Mexico was suspicious of the protocols for the tetanus toxoid campaign because they excludedallmalesandchildren and called for multipleinjections of the vaccine in onlywomenofreproductiveage. Yet, one injection provides protection for at least 10 years. The Committee had vials of the tetanus vaccine analyzed for hCG. It informed HLI about the tetanus toxoid vaccine. HLI then told its World Council members and HLI affiliates in more than 60 countries. Similar tetanus vaccines laced with hCG have been uncovered in the Philippines and in Nicaragua. In addition to the World Health Organization (WHO), other organizations involved in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine using hCG include the UNPopulationFund, the UN Development Programme, the World Bank, the PopulationCouncil, the RockefellerFoundation, the US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, and Uppsala, Helsinki, and Ohio State universities. The priest objects that, if indeed the purpose of the mass vaccinations is to prevent pregnancies, women are uninformed, unsuspecting, and unconsenting victims.”
“Vaccines are under development for the control of fertility in males and females. This review discusses developments in anti-fertility vaccines at the National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India. A single injection procedure for the sterilization or castration of male animals depending on the site at which the injection is given, has passed through fieldtesting and is expected to be on the market in the nearfuture. Vaccines inducing antibodiesagainstthehuman chorionic gonadotropin have gone through phase I trials with satisfactoryresults. A vaccine producing a consistentlybioeffectiveantibody response against gonadotropin-releasing hormone is ready for phase I/II clinical trials in patients of carcinoma of prostate after due experimentation in animals and toxicology studies. Research to identify sperm antigens for incorporation into second generation vaccines is in progress.”
Control, like farm animals. Single injection for castration of male animals possible.
Look forward to the “drop of testosterone levels”. At least you got to drink some bitch tits beer with the ‘boys’. Don’t come crying to me. You wanted to be ‘male animals’.
make medical decisions because celebrity, how insulting
among psyop techniques: cheerleader effect, black and white thinking, othering, appropriating the Christian servile role as if it applies to any other religion (nope, only Christians can be pussies actually and how dare you tell people what is moral with THEIR body), claiming others’ successes because of demographic, mentions of racial pride as natural leading to coercion and guilt (emotional abuse), mentions some developers were Muslim (weird they didn’t tell the rest of us…?) ingrouping, “no evidence it affects fertility” is legalese, they haven’t had time to gain evidence yet! they couldn’t legally claim it doesn’t impair fertility, “does not change or damage DNA” but they admitted it does….. then there’s the threat of violating the human right to a family life and religion WTF kinda gaslighting? Marxist appeal to collectivism doesn’t work in low trust multiculturalism, only homogeneous societies. Considering how many African girls Bill Gates has sterilised, this is shocking. I’m not the biggest fan of certain groups but I don’t think they should be poisoned.
In press releases, they claim it’s ‘not possible’ for it to change DNA, which is a barefaced lie. Explain the mechanism of ‘recombinant‘.
“Recombinant DNA molecules are DNA molecules formed by laboratory methods of genetic recombination that bring together genetic material from multiple sources, creating sequences that would not otherwise be found in the genome.“
“This medicinal product has been given authorisation for temporary supply by the UK Department of Health and Social Care and the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. It does not have a marketing authorisation, but this temporaryauthorisation grants permission for the medicine to be used….”
i am comforted, r u comforted?
they don’t intend to legally backtrack at all, no siree
” Produced in genetically modified human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells. This product contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs). ” so the lie in the video about not using human tissue WAS A LIE
according to – the NHS
I don’t lie. I called it before this document existed.
Official NHS document:
genetically modified human
genetically modified human
genetically modified human
and of particular comedy :-
“Disposal COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Any unused vaccine or waste material should be disposed of in accordance with local requirements. Spills should be disinfected with an appropriate antiviral disinfectant.” wait wut bro I thought you said it was harmless…?
Note: NO FULL INGREDIENT LIST, violates medical ethics.
keywords: preliminary, when fertility is longitudinal and ANIMAL aka non-human – totally different reproductive organs. Obviously a rat won’t react to GM human kidney spliced with chimp like a HUMAN WOULD.
I love how people think I’m crazy until they read the official bullshit I read. I am not crazy, rather informed.
There is a highly significant positive association between the percentage of people in a country who voted for populist parties and who believe that vaccines are not important (R = 0.7923, P = 0.007) and effective (R = 0.7222, P = 0.0035). The percentage of people who think vaccines are unsafe just misses being significant at the 5% level (R = 0.5027, P = 0.0669).
Vaccine hesitancy and political populism are driven by similar dynamics: a profound distrust in elites and experts. It is necessary for public health scholars and actors to work to build trust with parents that are reluctant to vaccinate their children, but there are limits to this strategy. The more general popular distrust of elites and experts which informs vaccine hesitancy will be difficult to resolve unless its underlying causes—the political disenfranchisement and economic marginalisation of large parts of the Western European population—are also addressed.
Yes, they called themselves ‘elites’.
How about a belief in human error and We Were Just Following Orders medical evil?
Those pesky conservatives, questioning unnecessary medical interventions with fatal side effects!!
Plumbers are responsible for saving more lives than doctors.
Self-reported vaccination for the current season was associated with a trend (P < 0.10) toward higher viral shedding in fine aerosol samples; vaccination with both the current and previous year’s seasonal vaccines, however, was significantly associated with greater fine-aerosol shedding in unadjusted and adjusted models (P < 0.01). In adjusted models, we observed 6.3 (95% CI 1.9–21.5) times more aerosol shedding among cases with vaccination in the current and previous season compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons.”
“The association of current and prior year vaccination with increased shedding of influenza A might lead one to speculate that certain types of prior immunity promote lung inflammation, airway closure, and aerosol generation. This first observation of the phenomenon needs confirmation. If confirmed, this observation, together with recent literature suggesting reduced protection with annual vaccination, would have implications for influenza vaccination recommendations and policies.”
“Prior immunity” promotes lung inflammation… Now I wanted to explain this part so that people wouldn’t be misled. Immunity and vaccination are not synonymous, in fact, this study provides the very evidence to prove that vaccinations like the influenza vaccine don’t provide immunity,
herd immunity is also a myth (search bar it)
hence the vaccinated being infected and spread it more. The correct wording should have read that “prior VACCINATIONS promote lung inflammation” as this fact has been shown in animal studies.
This means that when you receive a flu vaccine, elucidated by this study and animal studies, the lungs are damaged. Hence the scientific term/phrase “vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease” which in animal studies
has shown that flu vaccinations damage lung tissue of the vaccinated and distort or weaken the natural immunity of the host, person or animal. Could this be just one more reason more people are developing severe lung diseases like COPD or why the rates of asthma in America are increasing in the vaccinated?
The short and simple: The research shows…
The vaccine doesn’t protect one from infection.
That the vaccinated are “shedding”/spreading more virus simply by breathing.
That prior vaccination has weakened the immune systems of those who got the shot.
Individuals who receive the flu vaccine are placing others around them at greater risk than the unvaccinated.
Get the measles vaccine, and you won’t get the measles—or give it to anyone else. Right? Well, not always. A person fully vaccinated against measles has contracted the disease and passed it on to others. The startling case study contradicts received wisdom about the vaccine and suggests that a recent swell of measles outbreaks in developed nations could mean more illnesses even among the vaccinated.
more illnesses even among the vaccinated.
if ‘wisdom’ means marketing lies
When it comes to the measles vaccine, two shots are better than one. Most people in the United States are initially vaccinated against the virus shortly after their first birthday and return for a booster shot as a toddler. Less than 1% of people who get both shots will contract the potentially lethal skin and respiratory infection.
A cold is potentially lethal.
Water is potentially lethal.
Oxygen is potentially lethal.
And even if a fully vaccinated person does become infected—a rare situation known as “vaccine failure”—they weren’t thought to be contagious.
That’s why a fully vaccinated 22-year-old theater employee in New York City who developed the measles in 2011 was released without hospitalization or quarantine. But like Typhoid Mary, this patient turned out to be unwittingly contagious. Ultimately, she transmitted the measles to four other people, according to a recent report in Clinical Infectious Diseases that tracked symptoms in the 88 people with whom “Measles Mary” interacted while she was sick. Surprisingly, two of the secondary patients had been fully vaccinated. And although the other two had no record of receiving the vaccine, they both showed signs of previous measles exposure that should have conferred immunity.
A closer look at the blood samples taken during her treatment revealed how the immune defenses of Measles Mary broke down.
As a first line of defense against the measles and other microbes, humans rely on a natural buttress of IgM antibodies. Like a wooden shield, they offer some protection from microbial assaults but aren’t impenetrable. The vaccine (or a case of the measles) prompts the body to supplement this primary buffer with a stronger armor of IgG antibodies, some of which are able to neutralize the measles virus so it can’t invade cells or spread to other patients. This secondary immune response was presumed to last for decades.
Also a lie.
By analyzing her blood, the researchers found that Measles Mary mounted an IgM defense, as if she had never been vaccinated. Her blood also contained a potent arsenal of IgG antibodies, but a closer look revealed that none of these IgG antibodies were actually capable of neutralizing the measles virus. It seemed that her vaccine-given immunity had waned.
so…, antibody impotence?
assuming she ever had immunity
you just said “vaccine failure”, which means she was NEVER immune, despite being exposed to the vaccine
Although public health officials have assumed that measles immunity lasts forever, the case of Measles Mary highlights the reality that “the actual duration [of immunity] following infection or vaccination is unclear,” says Jennifer Rosen, who led the investigation as director of epidemiology and surveillance at the New York City Bureau of Immunization. The possibility of waning immunity is particularly worrisome as the virus surfaces in major U.S. hubs like Boston, Seattle, New York, and the Los Angeles area. Rosen doesn’t believe this single case merits a change in vaccination strategy—for example, giving adults booster shots—but she says that more regular surveillance to assess the strength of people’s measles immunity is warranted.
there are millions of diseases
If it turns out that vaccinated people lose their immunity as they get older, that could leave them vulnerable to measles outbreaks seeded by unvaccinated people—
but this case literally proves a fully “protected” person can CAUSE it
and if you ask about most outbreaks, “which % of that case group were already vaccinated for it?” they get angry and defensive and usually refuse to answer you
and the MSM doesn’t report it either… huh
which are increasingly common in the United States and other developed countries. Even a vaccine failure rate of 3% to 5% could devastate a high school with a few thousand students, says Robert Jacobson, director of clinical studies for the Mayo Clinic’s Vaccine Research Group in Rochester, Minnesota, who wasn’t involved with the study. Still, he says, “The most important ‘vaccine failure’ with measles happens when people refuse the vaccine in the first place.”