Hep B and babies

It’s been a while since I’ve beaten the immunologist’s pinata.

Spoiler: Literal baby-killers.

Immigration is putting the most vulnerable in society at risk.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-4749024/Babies-protected-against-deadly-hepatitis-B.html

“Babies born from today in England will be given a routine ‘six-in-one vaccine’, health officials have announced.”
So much for consent. Really, 100% now? Who is this protecting?
“The deadly virus is deemed a ‘major global health problem’ and considered to be on the rise due to immigration, Public Health England has previously admitted.”
“Dr Mary Ramsay, the body’s head of immunisation, said: ‘Until today, only children at high risk of hepatitis B would be immunised. ‘All children will now be routinely protected against this serious infection, which is a major cause of cirrhosis and liver cancer in later life.”
Pathogenic cancer. As in, you can still get other pathogens or new strains of that one and get the cancer.
It’s common in homosexuals, hookers and drug abusers. The wages of sin.
“It comes amid serious concerns that the number of cases of the blood-borne virus are soaring, partly due to immigration. In some sub-Saharan African countries, one in seven is a carrier. East Asia and parts of Eastern Europe are also hotspots.”
You know what those have in common? Prostitution and rape. Maybe sort that out than band-aiding the problem.
“At the time it concluded: ‘Long-term infections in migrants are estimated to account for around 96 per cent of all new long-term hepatitis B infections in the UK.'”
So they don’t want to look racist. Great. Why were they let in?
“A quarter of mothers giving birth on the NHS are now foreign-born.” Way more.
“The World Health Organization recommended in 1992 that babies should be given their first dose of a hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours.”
I bet they did.

I really question why infants without an immune system require sex worker shots.
https://academic.oup.com/ije/article-pdf/45/2/441/7921281/dyv349.pdf

“Fact: It is suggested that infants get the hepatitis B shot before they leave the hospital.”
Prime time to spring important decisions on a drugged-up mother. Assuming they ask.
“It is not required. Fact: You can work out your own vaccination schedule and guidelines with your pediatrician. Fact: Drug companies have certain vaccines with fewer additives and in single doses, consult your pediatrician’s office regarding their ordering. It is your child’s life, it is your right to know. Fact: An infant’s immune system is very weak at birth. The hepatitis B vaccine can cause serious reactions if the system is already compromised.”
http://www.iansvoice.org/

System shock is common in infants, they can’t even handle a cold.

“Perfectly safe”, they lie at Public Health England.
http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/348303
http://www.vaclib.org/pdf/sids/MV%20SIDS%201414_1421.pdf
“Conclusion: A systematic review of neonatal Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and other unexpected infant deaths following the initial dose of hepatitis B vaccination should be undertaken at the international level.”
At this rate, they should rename SIDS to Vaccine Death Syndrome.

It’s hard to find studies again, for some strange reason. Why aren’t they conducted and published?

Especially proper controls, how funny. The scientism crowd doesn’t want to follow accurate method when it might show a result they disagree with.

Vaccinated versus Unvaccinated study, straight up science

http://oatext.com/pdf/JTS-3-186.pdf

“This study aimed 1) to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated children on a broad range of health outcomes, and 2) to determine whether an association found between vaccination and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), if any, remained significant after adjustment for other measured factors.”

Okay.

So far, good science.

“In conclusion, vaccinated homeschool children were found to have a higher rate of allergies and NDD than unvaccinated homeschool children. While vaccination remained significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors…”
Oh, that’s why they refuse to study it.
Honestly, at least.

“There are very few randomized trials on any existing vaccine recommended for children in terms of morbidity and mortality,” they note, “in part because of ethical concerns involving withholding vaccines from children assigned to a control group.”

And the ethics of not conducting real science to legally allow something?
There is gonna be a huge lawsuit once this finally breaks. Humongous.

“In a final adjusted model designed to test for this possibility, controlling for the interaction of preterm birth and
vaccination, the following factors remained significantly associated with NDD: vaccination (OR 2.5, 95% CI: 1.1, 5.6),
nonwhite race (OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.1, 5.4), and male gender (OR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.2, 4.4).”

Vaccines are racist?

Well, the races are biologically different. Men go in for more medical studies, so maybe vaccines have been designed for the typical race involved in these studies: white.

“With regard to acute and chronic conditions, vaccinated children were significantly less likely than the unvaccinated to have had chickenpox and pertussis but, contrary to expectation, were significantly more likely to have been diagnosed with otitis media, pneumonia, allergic rhinitis, eczema, and NDD. The vaccinated were
also more likely to have used antibiotics, allergy and fever medications; to have been fitted with ventilation ear tubes; visited a doctor for a health issue in the previous year, and been hospitalized. The reason for hospitalization and the age of the child at the time were not determined, but the latter finding appears consistent with a study of 38,801 reports to the VAERS of infants who were hospitalized or had died after receiving vaccinations. The study reported a linear relationship between the number of vaccine doses administered at one time and the rate of hospitalization and death; moreover, the younger the infant at the time of vaccination, the higher was the rate of hospitalization and death [55].

The hospitalization rate increased from 11% for 2 vaccine doses to 23.5% for 8 doses (r2 = 0.91), while the case fatality rate increased significantly from 3.6% for those receiving from 1-4 doses to 5.4 % for those receiving from 5-8 doses.”

…. Vaccination with PCV-7 has a marked effect on the complete microbiota composition of the upper respiratory tract in children, going beyond shifts in the distribution of pneumococcal serotypes and known potential pathogens and resulting in increased anaerobes, gram-positive bacteria and gramnegative bacterial species”

Autism: 4.2 times higher risk
ADHD: 4.2 times higher risk
Learning disabilities: 5.2 times greater risk
Eczema: 2.9 times higher risk
Allergic rhinitis: a 30 times higher risk, yes thirty.

It’s tempting to point to babies who did die and pretend like there’s something medical science could have done. Some people will always die, some of those will be infants, the death rate will never be zero, but if you compared deaths without excluding illnesses caused by vaccines, those results would be interesting too.

Link: Anti-vaccination is reasonable

https://aeon.co/essays/anti-vaccination-might-be-rational-but-is-it-reasonable

Completely ignores all the vaccine reaction and damage cases but fine.

There was a study of mothers and their vaccine attitude, the rejecting mothers had higher average IQ. It was a minor point mentioned once.

The lower IQ tend to take all available medicines because they’re free or cheap and they trust the doctors.

The smarter people say “why should I risk my child for yours”?

And there is no rationally valid answer to this.

Doctors make mistakes.

It all comes down to emotional appeal.

The phrasing of ‘vaccine rejection’ implies they are the default. In medicine, there is no default treatment.

Every treatment must be tailored to the patient, and if there’s nothing wrong with them in the first place, there is no medical need for a treatment. Due to the legal protections of the companies and doctors’ kickbacks dispensing these vaccines, and the secrecy and fraud of medical research, there is a seriously imbalanced power dynamic. They’d hold down these kids screaming if they could get away with it. Would violating an adult’s body be treated so leniently by the law? Do children not have human rights?

There are many counter-indicators for vaccination, and this is what the parents reference.

For example, a history of chemical reactions and vaccine damage in the family point to a genetic vulnerability, unstudied. No amount of words is going to alter that.

Pregnancy is another one but sure, get the flu jab!

As covered previously, the ‘herd immunity’ hypothesis has been demonstrated as false. They are seriously suggesting 100% of people get them. Who TF are they protecting? Oh, but there’s a tiny asterisk to it – all who can get it.

Technically, we can all get it.

This is an is/ought problem. You can get it, but that doesn’t change the true Q: should you?

If Parent B’s kid dies, it isn’t Parent A’s fault. It is Parent A for putting them in the contaminating situation (if knowingly) and the Doctors’ faults for failing to treat it (AKA their job). 

Shifting the blame makes them look impotent.

It is a parent’s obligation to protect their child. Their own. Beyond that, the responsibility ends. I am no more responsible for some random person in Africa than they are for me.

Nobody else has this duty to the individual child. Not the doctors, the manufacturers, the researchers or the lawmakers.

Naturally there will be a big T-rex size bone of contention.

Ad hominem along the lines of stupid all the way up to evil just makes the ‘professionals’ look like they don’t know what they’re doing, and confidence drops further. When they refuse to do a double-blind 50:50 split longitudinal study with placebos, who would trust them? They say it’s unethical but look at who’s talking – they’ve bribed finagled it so they, a company, cannot be sued. They are not negligent legally and can maintain secrecy for withdrawn vaccines (the reasons), for example. The manufacture and testing procedure for vaccines does not follow the scientific method, so it is not scientific. They dodge the law and ideally, their service rendered is unnecessary.

  • Vaccines wear off. Needing replacement of a different composition and batch to the original.
  • Vaccines shed. Endangering those around you, especially those with compromised immunity.
  • Vaccines interact. Nobody knows how, the studies don’t look for it, but the schedule list gets longer and longer. Kids like cocktail shakers.
  • Vaccine adjuvants (deliberately included with the intention of distressing the body) like mercury (still in some vaccines) and aluminium may/probably caused the recent spike in autoimmune disorders and definitely brain damage (can we say special school) and probably caused the rise in retardation diagnoses. Not to mention how this combines with environmental pollutants like endocrine disruptors.
  • Vaccine failure happens.
  • Different demographics, different responses (most test patients are young adult male, without getting into race and drug abuse histories).
  • Vaccines in children (developing bodies) will work differently than those in adults (studied).
  • Vaccine studies constantly self-correct and it is invisible in wider public health studies. You will never see vaccinations accounted for as a factor. It is never controlled for as a variable. The information simply isn’t taken! Like the 50:50 thing!

None of these facts is accounted for in ‘soothing’ discussions.

The risk is taken onto the child using the parent’s ignorance. Because let’s face it, you’re going in blind.

There is a sin of omission argument they are trying to use.
Refusing an unnecessary chemical intervention is not a sin.

And who gets to decide who is worthy of the herd immunity protection? Who really deserves to be exempt?

Because that’s the real judgement they’re making, isn’t it?

‘Your healthy child isn’t worthy of this protection.

In my opinion, the risk of their pain and lifelong suffering is worth sparing this other, already-diseased child/adult.’

Forgive me for not killing/hurting MY (hypothetical) child so some deranged pozzed pig can fuck around at orgies a few more years before ODing.

HPV vaccine and ‘ovarian failure’, ovarian cancer links acknowledged

truthkings.com/2016/01/28/pediatricians-association-formally-admits-hpv-vaccine-causes-ovarian-cancer/#

Ovarian failure is infertility.

The American College Of Pediatricians has announced that the HPV vaccine is “possibly” associated with ovarian cancer. You can view the document here.

  …..It has recently come to the attention of the College that one of the recommended vaccines could possibly be associated with the very rare but serious condition of premature ovarian failure (POF), also known as premature menopause…….

h/t VoxDay

I refuse to joke on this topic.
To even acknowledge openly any risk, it must be awful. If anyone reading this from search has been affected I can’t imagine your grief. This is why I warn people off.

Link: Nearly all of our medical research is wrong

Nearly all of our medical research is wrong

OT: The vaccine brigade would do well to remember the field has problems…

Don’t expect that cure for cancer soon, the charities should be sued for false advertising.

This is mostly a pharma finding.

Something is rotten in the state of biomedical research. Everyone who works in the field knows this on some level. We applaud presentations by colleagues at conferences, hoping that they will extend the same courtesy to us, but we know in our hearts that the majority or even the vast majority of our research claims are false.

This paper linked: http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124#pmed-0020124-b6

When it came to light that the biotechnology firm Amgen tried to reproduce 53 “landmark” cancer studies and managed to confirm only six, scientists were “shocked.”

Sure they were.