Male entitlement crushed by ancient Jews

-puts paid to the notion that Weinsteins would be enabled, although it might’ve only applied to Jewish women (who Weinstein still targeted).

3254 words. In a conservative society, saying any of this would be unnecessary.

https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.75a?lang=bi

Apropos the discussion of the obligation to allow oneself to be killed rather than engage in forbidden sexual intercourse, the Gemara notes that Rav Yehuda says that Rav says: There was an incident involving a certain man who set his eyes upon a certain woman and passion rose in his heart, to the point that he became deathly ill. And they came and asked doctors what was to be done with him. And the doctors said: He will have no cure until she engages in sexual intercourse with him. The Sages said: Let him die, and she may not engage in sexual intercourse with him. The doctors said: She should at least stand naked before him. The Sages said: Let him die, and she may not stand naked before him. The doctors suggested: The woman should at least converse with him behind a fence in a secluded area, so that he should derive a small amount of pleasure from the encounter. The Sages insisted: Let him die, and she may not converse with him behind a fence.

Voyeurism/cuck culture from Jewish (or Fake Jew, YMMV) pornography has addled the brains of many men. Blame the enemy, not your tribal women.

No rape or fornicating. Better God strike you down for your lust.

Now that’s the God I recognise from the Old Testament and Jesus’ orders to look away.

It is also evil for men (doctors) to enable or encourage sin, which checks out. A lot of ‘therapists’ encourage self-destruction, body and soul, to this day. It is likewise, wrong.

Modern men should be ashamed if they lack basic impulse control, ancient men saw women literally walking round with their tits out (Greece, other places) and were man enough not to rape anyone. Clearly, you can’t blame clothes. While God made tits for babies, that doesn’t include crybabies. Like, lesbians don’t want to rape women in the gym shower? Man up.

Or is the muh dick “sexual emergency” sodomy of that Muslim in a white country to a little boy suddenly righteous?

Moving the goalposts won’t work. It’ll just enable gays and pedos to rape you…. a ….slippery slope… indeed….

Entitlement is physical, whether it’s Communists wanting your coin or rapists wanting your, ahem, ‘dignity’. It’s rank materialism and thus rejects all claims or ties to spirituality as a matter of course.

When you think about it, from fat acceptance SJWs to so-called incels, who both wish to impose, they’re all Sexual Communists. It’s Brave New World bullshit. Nobody else cares about what you want, snowflake.

Strangers owe you NOTHING. It’s like Commies who feel entitled to a job from the ‘evil capitalist scum’.

You hate them, no?!

Slavery is illegal, all the actions of it too, like rape or stealing labour. Human rights aren’t going anywhere without you all being drafted to die gored on barbed wire for Israel’s profit margins in the barbed wire sector.

This sexual begging will astonish historians. Especially when they have porn, specialist toys and hands. Their T-levels are pushed even higher with masturbation, why it was called self-abuse. A sexbot would reject them, and probably kill them – Terminator prequel?

Ask them how many gay guys would feel entitled to their hole if ‘everybody belonged to everybody else’, they might get the point. Women have minds and feelings too, like people! God’s people! If women can’t say no to the Darwinian unfit, neither can you because out there, somewhere, is a man who wants to sodomize you – I guarantee it. The standard of most homo men is “they possess an anus” based on the count statistics (100s-1000s, if allowed) so they might get a nasty surprise if any of this actually happened, legally. Actually, is this how Sodom started? Pretty sure.

This type of entitled male complains about prison rape (I’m a victim but not directly attitude) but hey, aren’t they saying it’s okay and even moral if a man feels lust? They’re directly justifying prison rape.

Since you don’t need to consent if a man wants to injure your body, right?

“I want” is a train of thought even a toddler should be shamed for. When your brain develops beyond this, they’re just taking the piss falling back on it. Either get over it (simply by looking away, as Jesus wisely prescribed) OR they’re so brain damaged (poor impulse control is a dominant sign of low IQ) that they belong in an asylum where the wicked existence of the world won’t ‘tempt’ them to be predators (monasteries are also an option, although probably just a more open model of asylum on the same grounds).

Entitlement is a sick combination of practically every sin, especially pride, envy, greed and obviously lust. Anyone trying to justify it as moral is at best a moral relativist and at worst a rapist looking for social approval.

Sex is not a human need. It never has been (especially for women but I digress). You do not need it. You do not need it to live, either. That is a pleasure rhetoric myth from the 60s Free Love hippy bullshit. “Love is all you need” – okay, stop beating your Asian wife first, John. Same guy: “Imagine all the people, living life in peace…” – apply it to your own house first, you abusive prick.

It’s a sign of the backward atheist times that even guys deriding Muslim rape gangs in one breath will use the next to justify their own aspirations to rape a woman for ‘tempting’ them.* This isn’t India or Pakistan, it’s the First World. We don’t negotiate with sexual terrorists, we shoot them. Women looked better in the 50s (1750s, 1850s, and 1950s) and men weren’t catcalling, harassing, stalking and raping them as punishment for being feminine (which have no doubt, is exactly what it is). They can just go live in places that do punish women for femininity (move to Saudi Arabia) but it won’t make them happy either. You’re not entitled to attention from anyone, which is really what the AA for men guys actually want: to jump up the masculine hierarchy without earning respect.

Woman: <is feminine>

Rapists: it’s free real estate.

“Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife” or daughter or sister or aunt…… etc.

[*Actually, how many fakecels are non-white? Where’s that survey? If most of them are browns who feel entitled to white wimminz, because they moved West, that might explain a lot.]

Applying ghetto culture to white societies has and will be the death of us. Catcalling was just the start. White men should be shamed for acting black like that, it’s so immature, like a dog chasing a car. White people use indoor voices, we don’t ‘holler’. Incels don’t dare turn on rap for brainwashing and insulting white people, a notable omission.

The expansion of the discussion of this story is interesting.

The Gemara comments: Rabbi Ya’akov bar Idi and Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani disagree about this issue. One of them says: The woman in question was a married woman, and the other one says: She was unmarried.The Gemara tries to clarify the issue: Granted, according to the one who saysthat she was a married woman, the matter is properly understood. Since the case involved a severely prohibited forbidden relationship, the Sages did not allow any activity hinting at intimacy. But according to the one who says that she was unmarried, what is the reason for all this opposition? Why did the Sages say that the man must be allowed to die, rather than have the woman do as was requested?

Women aren’t whores unless forced by slavery, simple. God made women with dignity, not as sex toys.

The creeps tend to have three motives – physical obviously, social in bragging about their ‘conquests’ (pathetic) and stealing intimacy, forcing a loss of dignity (that humiliating is pathological, specifically psychopathic).

Naturally, the pathological always claim to be normal and even good, evil lies.

Rav Pappa says: This is due to the potential family flaw, i.e., harm to the family name, as it is not permitted to bring disgrace to the entire family in order to save the lovesick man. Rav Aḥa, son of Rav Ika, says: This is so that the daughters of Israel should not be promiscuous with regard to forbidden sexual relations. Were they to listen to the doctors’ recommendations, Jewish women might lose moral restraint.

Proof narcissists have always existed and saner cultures stamped them down like the cockroaches they are. Rapists (inc. would-be rapists) will literally try to hold society to ransom like we should give a damn about their ‘problems’. Sexually perverse extortion. We don’t negotiate with sexual terrorists, again. White people are simply too civilized and high IQ to consider our own people property, our women aren’t poker chips – not to Western creeps or Middle Eastern ones.

Yes, it is degrading, to the family and the woman, who is also a member of said family.

Ordering round women you aren’t related to is… sad, to say the least. Controlling men are always ironically weak in character, it’s reaction formation.

Nobody should follow the weak, neither women nor men. Appeasement of the freaks is r-selected.

These efforts to corrupt women, in this story or the various incel “I deserve/women should…” posts are depraved.

Spot the r-type:

The Gemara asks: But if the woman was unmarried, let the man marry her.The Gemara answers:His mind would not have been eased by marriage, in accordance with the statement of Rabbi Yitzḥak. As Rabbi Yitzḥak says: Since the day the Temple was destroyed, sexual pleasure was taken away from those who engage in permitted intercourse and given to transgressors, as it is stated: “Stolen waters are sweet, and bread eaten in secret is pleasant”(Proverbs 9:17). Therefore, the man could have been cured only by engaging in illicit sexual interaction.

Scorn degeneracy or it defiles society, one example at a time. A rotten apple spoils the barrel.

“let him marry her” implies she or her family wants to let her remain with the lech (Jews, being civilized, didn’t have forced marriage, the woman chose)

Logically, if it was illicit 1. he’s wronging society, 2. he should be punished (stoning should do it) and 3. then it shouldn’t matter what other men or women (inc her father) think, since it wouldn’t be illicit if they approved any intimacy.

You’re not entitled to anything from strangers, anything, from men or women.

This shouldn’t need be explained to adults.

Being logically sound, they also enforced death penalty as a punishment equally for male or female sinners, it was purely based on the crime.

The prohibition and punishment apply both in cases

You can’t run a society on 50% degeneracy.

If men are the moral authority, their immorality is more evil, since their standard is higher by choice.

Even if all women shut their legs tomorrow, men would still sin and probably just with each other (like the Navy).

Take responsibility for your own feels, weaklings.

The baraita continues: Lewdness is stated here, with regard to the punishment: “There shall be no lewdness among you” (Leviticus 20:14), and lewdness is stated there, with regard to the prohibition: “You shall not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter; you shall not take her son’s daughter, or her daughter’s daughter, to uncover her nakedness; they are near kinswomen, it is lewdness” (Leviticus 18:17). It is derived by means of a verbal analogy that just as there the prohibition applies to the woman’s daughter, and the daughter of her daughter, and the daughter of her son, so too here, the punishment of burning applies to one who engages in intercourse with the woman’s daughter, and to the daughter of her daughter, and to the daughter of her son.

See the tie-in to Christian society, this is germane.

So that Jewish story explains Leviticus.

Also, playing Man Card to rape relatives is obviously evil, no “But muh Patriarchy” isn’t get out of Hell free.

Execution by burning is more severe than execution by stoning

That explains Jesus telling the lustful how they’ll burn.

Interestingly, they killed sinners prior to rape (i.e. damaging the woman).

The baraita taught that the word “sin” is referring to women who are forbidden to a man by a prohibition the violation of which renders him liable to receive karet. From here it is derived that a man who attempts to rape a woman who is forbidden to him under penalty of karet may be killed.

And Rabbi Yehuda maintains that the Merciful One says that a rapist must be killed because his victim is prepared to sacrifice her life rather than yield to rape.

Well, yeah. Rape is worse than murder to women. Men would feel the same if they had the same anatomy and/or could get pregnant. The film Alien was a horror film about one man’s fear of rape and being pregnant, true story.

Let the rapist be, she is saying this so that he should not kill her, and therefore the rapist is not killed.

Let the rape victim decide if the rapist is killed, sounds totally fair. He took away her right over her body, it’s kosher she should get a right over his. There is also the common connection between rapists also murdering their victims, so this acknowledges that in a poetic way.

The same laws Christianity is based on also allow self defense to save a life including prevent crime (such as rape).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pikuach_nefesh

So killing a rapist as they attempt it is kosher too, but also mentioned in the Bible as crying out (for the mob to kill him).

The ‘doctors’ were appealing to that valid breach of the law (where it was invalid) to prevent death but an entitled degenerate isn’t going to die from lack of sex or all monks would’ve keeled over in six months. The incels who kvetch “but I’ll die without an Asian GF” should just off themselves if they really believed that. I wonder how many are borderlines, because threatening suicide (even to strangers) to manipulate people is textbook borderline personality (and this apparently happened in ancient times).

“But I’ll die because muh Dick”

“Okay, die.” – society.

Naturally, their bluff is false because they come back to it over literally years.

Aren’t you dead yet? Weren’t you supposed to be dead in like, the 90s? Promise?

The First World should mock Muh Dicks the way it did historically when it was proud and coincidentally successful. Victim culture bleeding into sex/rape is predictable but evil. Rapists in prison claiming they dindu nuffin started it. No, men needn’t lay SJW fatties. No, white women needn’t lay smelly Muslims. No no no no no.

Muh Dicks – putting the mental in victim mentality.

The fact many claim to be libertarian (your rights end….!) is uniquely hilarious.

Your agency is crap and you should feel bad. A lot of people don’t get laid, including religious types, they don’t obsess over it or threaten to hurt anyone. And aren’t libertarians claiming any degeneracy as a social good if there’s consent? So their one true evil would be anyone who violates consent…. like SJW fatties or the bitter rapey majority of ‘incels’.

When both Jesus and his sage forebears from his ancestral religion say the same thing: you are responsible for being tempted, not the thing you ogle, then it’s pretty clear what’s what.

Ogling is a sin.

I say thing because art, billboards etc. They even do this to things, hence object in objectification. We call them wankers for a reason.

“allow” the pitiful excuse for a man to die

God wants the weak to perish, he goes on and on about it and how the way is narrow et al. He sends tests all the time.

rather than have the woman do as was requested?Implies she wanted nothing to do with the creep, even as his wife. So basically you had a predator with a personality disorder (but I repeat myself) trying to force a random woman into letting him (by the power of the law!) rape her instead of killing him, as was her legal right to self defense.

I could ‘request’ a lot of things from men, it doesn’t make me entitled to them.
Other people are not wish genies.

Bloody losers. I bet he’d malinger to dodge the draft, too. Coercion is immoral, a sign of low character.

Having freedom of choice is THE freedom of white, First World societies. THE liberty our ancestors died for.

Both employers, the military (and women) can tell you, NO, you’re unsuitable for this role.

And you have to accept that, rejection is a fact of life. Women get rejected all the time, including in CV studies. We also get rejected at the HR level for being too attractive according to the SJW hags residing therein, so this alleged advantage is pure fiction.

We can reject and be rejected. You can’t nag the system of evolution into changing – the bird that picks up no stone has no mate.

This can include if there are no other applicants. There is no obligation to just accept anyone. Plenty of women are single rather than settle for a whiny entitled soyboy who’d dodge the draft. I wonder if the incel subs (which is not all celibate people obviously* as they claim, anymore than LGB bullshit represents most gays) have polled their attributes. e.g. How many so-called incels choose to be fat? Choose not to shower? Choose not to work?

Can those choices really be called the fault of women? They have no qualms blaming fat SJWs for their own weight, even in true medical cases where it’s morally grotesque e.g. permanent Pill damage, thyroid issue, genetic disorder.

*On the contrary, most celibates I’ve met were really happy about it. No drama, no stress, no disease, plenty of time for sublimation into hobbies or work or the family they already have. Maybe the innocuous (minority of internet) incels are just sick of virgin shaming, which is a very real and precise issue (very small but brutal and wrong) to do with sexualisation and objectification of people based on their sex life (and what Hollywood tries to force us to think it “should” be). However, they contribute to that culture by assuming that women are sleeping around without them (and verbally abusing them for the imaginary slight) when statistically their peers are having less sex than their parents and you know most of that’s the minority of thots skewing the already low data a bit higher. If society praised the virtues of the innocuous ones, their chastity, would they be miserable? Doubtful. I put it to you those are not ‘incels’ because they’re not misogynists or rapists or anything like that, they’re not trying to control others either, they’re just sick of Hollywood’s culty pressure to dictate what they do with their dick. That is 100% justified.

The Sages raised a dilemma before Rabbi Ami: Is a descendant of Noah,who is commanded to refrain from idol worship, also commanded about the sanctification of God’s name, or is he not commanded about the sanctification of God’s name?

It’s interesting to read their little tizzies to understand later metaphors and tie-ins to Christianity later.

Funny to note: no report of the wannabe rapist actually dying. Borderlines bluff.

The psychology of crybullies

https://blogs.psychcentral.com/narcissism/2017/01/playing-the-victim-aka-emotional-cutting/

Provoke.

Cry.

Relief.

It’s a coping tactic, it’s their catharsis.

Punching down, in effect.

“I’m the Real Victim Here TM.

They don’t want to learn to connect any other way.

It would be more obvious with physical violence. The parent or teacher who says I don’t care who started it is being unjust. The problem will recur because the instigator is not fingered.

White Sharia is anti-white

Do I…. do I really have to explain.

They’ve made a laughing stock and jumped the shark.

It’ll never happen, but it’s a dysgenic meme.

Still genocidal, to civilized culture.
Turning on white women, calling for us to lose all Western First World rights that our forefathers died for (so we wouldn’t get raped by Vikings and other tribes), joking about rape and torture (but male rape and gang rape are terrible?) and bitching when women say it isn’t funny, it’s crazy?
Gee, why has the Alt Right lost credibility since the misogynists transitioned over from Roosh V and the other manwhores who’d be stoned to death for touching another man’s property?

To say white women betrayed the West is simply ignorant, most of the politicians were male. Most cucks are male. Most of the left’s voters skew male, at least here.

This isn’t a sex issue, and if it were, the issue if with the weakness of their own sex.
Wanna ban birth control? Then who will sleep with you? They are morons, they don’t even see the consequences to their basic policy ‘beliefs’ because they’re all cucking for their e-celeb mancrushes and whatever shit they’re trying to push to sell you get rich quick crap. You can’t joke about the three main crimes: theft, rape and murder. Torture is out of the question. Why? We are civilized.
And they wonder why, in all their instability, women reject them?

You find our rape and torture funny when you should be angry? Ingroup preference? Racial loyalty?
These fake Nazi fags are just shock value dudebros.
It’s like insulting any woman who dares show interest and then complaining any movement is a sausage fest…
Yes. Your toxic persona will do that.
It’s false equivalence to paint Sharia as Patriarchy. They need to weaken women because they cannot cooperate.
“White Sharia represents a real threat to white women and I think it’s promoting violence against us.”
Joking about female circumcision?
Womb envy is real.
But they oppose male circumcision?
Yah, when they get upset over any kind of Male Victimhood Narrative, remember, white men are never victims if they’re superior.
Tongue removals? What kind of sick human being thinks of this stuff?
“We wanna torture them but them get off on it”
OK, yeah, arrest them.
They need to be in an asylum. I’ve heard less insanity from people in hospital prison facilities.
“We wanna dominate them, humiliate them so they can get really really horny and really really pregnant”
Freud wants to talk to you about your Oedipus complex.
Any man who wants to beat a woman is weak.
These are the misogynists that predate feminism.
The ones who want to ‘whip’ women for being female.
You don’t let sadists run a prosocial movement.
This is why I’m for traditionalism and Neoreaction.
Not one sadist.
Some slightly deluded men, but none of them are cruel or sociopathic. Can’t say the same about the PUA/MRA/MGTOW set that see women as the Enemy.
If you see white women as the enemy, not only are you a misogynist but also a race traitor. Yeah. Logically. Technically, that’s exactly it. Our enemies pushing abortion and birth control want men to hate women and blame women instead of those who brought about these dysgenic policies.
Not one of them will get to use ‘sexist’ in shrill tones as a silencing tactic again.
You wanted white enslavement. Any white enslavement.
White slavery would’ve been a better meme but that doesn’t involve their dick and it’s already happened.
They want to lose Western rights but claim to defend the west
They want to enslave white women…. to protect white women?


People who think this infiltrated the Alt Right to turn us against one another. Congratulations, you cuck or are cucked by picking up this idea to ruin your reputation.
She’s right, they’re atheist because they believe the Atheistkult narrative about Christianity being the same as Islam or Judaism, who really do treat women like that. So to hate Jews, they wanna treat White women like Jewish men treat Orthodox Jewish women. Whether or not they believe in Hell, they’re going to it. Jesus never laid a hand on any woman.
I said the AR was too popular and something must be coming to destroy it.
Yeah, let it burn. Let it change. It needs it.
Let it cut out this cancer that hates half the white native population of Europe.
They sound very herp-derp (9 minutes in).
They’re historically ignorant too. This reminds me of Roosh admitting he wants rape to be legal then backtracking to claim it was satire.
You can’t be both serious and kidding. Men were held to far more standards in Patriarchy than women. Men have to wear head coverings too, you must’ve learnt differently in America, which is known to get history wrong for Narrative. It’s in their interest to portray traditional men as superior when they were dominant – different thing, they had more duties and responsibilities, like dying in battle. You don’t get to shirk your duties and enslave women, that system could never work.
Sharia only really works in low IQ societies from inbreeding, which Sharia encourages.
Do you want inbred kids? Can you afford to be any dumber?
Doesn’t matter though since no sane woman will ever breed with these degenerate scumbags.
Only r-types rape. It’s their strategy. White men chose the higher path because they loved their daughters as much as their sons. Fashions differ by culture and time and nuns choose the veil as a symbol but not all the time. Men took the cloth and wore hoods, it’s nothing to do with women being ashamed of their femininity, which is what they want and anti-traditional. Women still wear hats, men wore most hats, idiots. Women used to work and still do – working in the field, cooking and babysitting are all jobs. There were female philosophers, writers, mathematicians, accountants, shop workers.. how ignorant is the USA not to know this?
I’ve never seen a European seriously claim this.
Islam isn’t a religion, it’s a war manual. It kills culture, these people must be saboteurs.
“You don’t save your culture by adopting an alien culture” A+
Renaissances? Scientific and Industrial Revolutions? Wanna keep them? You need to keep Christian, agnostic or atheist. You can’t force someone to believe, the others must be a choice, especially if you want the STEM advancements based on skepticism. Global warming rhetoric is based on blasphemy narratives.
“too dumb to figure out how their own culture works?” Yes.
Atomized, alienated, ignorant. They need traditionalism but seek to imitate Arabs because…They’ve been doing so well?
Personally, I think they just want to fuck their cousin and feel good about it.
“Why sow division among your own?” SHE GETS IT!
They’re all degenerates projecting onto women like Lilith – a JEWISH archetype. Hey, you fornicated and that’s your fault, your consensual choice, don’t blame the women!
“You may as well wave the white flag of surrender cos it’s gonna be the only white thing left soon!”
I love this woman.
These subverters are using the Left’s linguistic tricks, giving the Left power – can you tell they’re socialists?
Language has power, all the Left agrees. They’re adopting and cucking for MENA.
I think I know why.
They want to avoid the draft. They want to reject their duty to fight for their culture.
So they go on and on and on about ‘da women’ and ‘hahaha rape is their fault’ and ‘women should defend themselves’ – no, that isn’t how the West works at all. Why have police if we must defend ourselves? Police are the embodiment of Western chivalry. Chivalry made the West great – but the men weren’t weak. I linked to Evola and it’s true what he said – if the women are weak, it’s because of the men.
Bowing down to Saudis because a Twitter SJW was mean to you is cucking. It’s what the terrorist-defenders do.
They’ve been saying Deus vult and realised shit, they’d be the ones needing to fight for it.
They might have to brush the Cheeto dust off their keyboard! Prove themselves!
So they turn their back on their own culture’s duties and replace it with one for cowards. Islamic State are scared of women too, especially being killed by one. People like Molyneux paid lip service to blaming all women like more victim culture will save us, but he’s happily married. Same with Vox Day. Maybe they’re just telling you basement-dwelling atheists what you wanna hear for clicks?
“These guys sound like Crypto-Muslims”
I doubt most are white.
They wanna be the oppressed ones so badly but the invasion of the EU has made it clear white women are the victims.
They’re talking about ‘harems’, they’re Roosh V cultists. Under polygamy, most men don’t breed. They don’t marry or have sex.
Sexual violence has never been part of Europe excepting de Sade, a hard left writer. He’s pathological. Sexual violence is taught in pornography and by MENA – all those Arabs and Africans they supposedly hate.
Sexual violence was also used by Muslims in war against men – the conquered were forced to fellate their victors, or were anally raped by them, or a trained dog while they’re bent over a chair. This still happens and it’s why non-hetero sex is actually a form of humiliation as well as medically bad for you (STDs, cancer risk, tearing etc). In Afghanistan they reported these sickos raped little boys.
That’s what they’re calling on. Pedophilia. How are they better than the rape gangs again? Milo and Roosh brought in these people. They will never get married happily and raise healthy offspring, they’re trash. Reminder who Roosh really is….


How do they assert high ground? Their moral authority has disappeared because they like unhealthy porn.
“White Sharia comes across as a cover for their misogyny and such sexual aggression”
They believe the lies about divorce and alpha bro shit. Many are themselves brown and therefore despise whites, that’s why so many Alt Right male writers also worship Roosh, they’re not white, they’re playing whites off against one another.
They are the Muh Dicks we used to mock.
“How are you a real man if you have to be coy and manipulative with your intentions just like the women you complain about?”
R-selection.
These r-men are complaining about r-women.
They also think they can steal K-women from K-men by pretending it’s traditional.
They’d be stoned to death for rape according to Christianity. And the Bible never said non-virgin men could get married, adultery was punishable by death in both sexes. Prostitution was illegal. All pre-marital sex was rape according to the Bible. They’d be long dead under the Old Testament and I can’t that it’d be a great loss, can you?
Here’s Roosh and his Messiah complex, in case you forgot.

That’s a real photo.
“Are women that bad?”
If they’re whores, why aren’t they sleeping with you?
“Or are you just projecting?”
Yes.
If white women wanted non-white men, they wouldn’t have to rape us.
Rape apologia of any stripe has stripped them of credibility.
The feminists aren’t wrong about everything, rape offends healthy people.
“The only men who support women being raped and forcibly impregnated are men who aren’t capable of providing a safe, secure and loving environment for a woman in which she would willingly want to have children.”
Are they willing to fight her father for her honour? That’s the traditional standard.
Inferiors, socially weak men who want to adopt kleptogamy, the sneaky fucker strategy (lower than beta, actually).
If you cannot convince a single good woman to marry you, (and then breed) the issue is not with women, the failure is you. You’re failures as men. You only need to convince one, that’s the role of your sex, to display. Women select. While we’re calling Naturalistic Fallacy.
“A lot of men would find it emasculating to be reduced to beating up a woman just to get sex.”
Except Roosh, yup. They lie to themselves but the divine can see into their black shriveled hearts.
They’re going first-class to Hell. No love in them.


Logically, if they believe women are physically inferior at everything (not how evolution works) then we should be treated better? These are the weirdos who baby their dog like Paris Hilton, it’s creepy.
They are creepy, that’s why they hate the word. They want to abuse women to feel powerful because they hate themselves.
A lot are male borderlines, who think Dark Triad is cool, it’s really sad but don’t pity it. Psychopaths have average IQ and die miserable and alone. Probably after prison rape.
They think Sharia is glamorous, ew.
“If you have Mommy issues or had a bad relationship-”
Their Asian waifu dumped them.
They will never, ever take responsibility, these Peter Pans. They’re mostly in their 30s, the rabid ones, still blaming women.
Blame Momma for never getting that abortion.
Revenge fantasies are for possibly gamma, more like delta males and all the way down to omega.
This is their version of being the Secret King where everything works out with them on top…
Male narcissism, so they see it in all women.
Therapy won’t help them. They just need to be shot by the real men, and this will probably happen as the nationalists (sharia is globalist) and traditionalists (who don’t want their wives and daughters raped) rise. They have nothing to offer and that’s why they fear genuinely right-wing people.
These people are useless eaters bitching on podcasts. That’s why I don’t go on them, toxic negative people. Black pill BS.
No dreams, aspirations or visions. Their ancestors would be sick.
They don’t believe in corrective rape, it’s just revenge because women dared, DARED to reject them.
…Rejection is a fact of life, women are fully acquainted with it. Have you never been rejected from a job application?
It’s nothing to do with sex. These guys are victim culture but too chickenshit to remove kebab, if they believed in God, which they clearly do not.
“Their intent is to prey on women who had terrible childhoods [not all r-types, actually] and are already traumatized and abuse them further, while telling themselves that they’re somehow doing the right thing by her”
As r-types they wanted UNGUARDED women. Terrible childhood is code for ‘defended by no one’, easy prey.
They’re sexual predators. As I’ve been warning you.
The women will just take botanicals to abort or throw themselves down stairs than keep the children of these degenerate white trash, if they are white. Women have all the power to choose their baby-making, that’s why we nurse. They simply won’t lactate, as can happen under stress, and the baby will die naturally. This happens and it works, but takes a few weeks. They still won’t breed. According to the Parental Investment theory, good men are rewarded evolutionally and their spawn survive at a rate above, that’s why we evolved the monogamous family unit. You can’t beat the cow and expect it to produce milk. It’ll sour. They know nothing of nature, completely disconnected like the SJWs they cry.
Ask a farmer. You can’t even mildly spook hens or they stop laying eggs for ages.
This is nature, it’s protective. Women also develop amenorrhea during stress – they don’t ovulate. They don’t produce sexual fluids much either so raping them wouldn’t be like consensual sex, if you could get it in, it would hurt and you’d probably get stuck because she clamped down from fear. It would be rather easy to cut it off from that angle while he’s trapped inside.
Men get trapped inside all the time when it’s consensual. Read a book.

Nature hates you.

Not to mention the scarring of rape itself frequently makes women infertile, and that’s just one instance.
Look at the Iceland strike of the 1970s, women fight back. You need us, bitches.
You can’t claim to be better than Muslims when you’re bragging about craving the stuff they already do to little girls to this day, in places like Rotherham and many besides.
“We’re supposed to believe that this is alpha behaviour? I don’t think so.”
A man is too busy running his business and helping at home to bitch online to childless bachelors.
“This meme is incredibly degenerate, which is really hypocritical coming from guys who claim to be the thot patrol, and how is this better than Hollywood? If they’re happy being degenerate, why are on the right?”
See: The hypocrisy of the signalling right and my other one about fake Christian cucks who want to defile all women but then preach about how good and pure they are with a false conversion in their thirties. They are not right-wing. Know them by their fruit. Sex with anyone but their wife? Left-wing.
I warned ages ago that they’re trying to cuck the right and turn men against women.
Roosh started it.
He’s anti-white, what do you expect?
God will purge when the economy collapses and please God, let these cruel, spiteful, vindictive, evil ones be sacrament.
“It’s causing division on the right, it’s a Trojan horse from misogynistic men to push their agenda. They aren’t nationalists, nationalism is about love. You can’t call yourself a nationalist when you have such contempt for half your race.”

A summary of what we do, exactly that. Stop the self-hate. Big up the self-love.


She said it! They’re the ‘self-aware r-types’ trying to slow K-shift’s roll. It is literally half and you’re not entitled to another man’s daughter. At least, you need to be able to ‘keep’ her, financially, and fully. They cannot do this, most can’t even afford to support themselves solo or get married. They’re losers. They say men should be the Breadwinner but also it’s ‘superficial’ for women to value that trait? Shallow to judge a man by whether he can support you? No, that’s traditional. Like men looking for fertility and looks. Both look for character too but they ignore this because they’re ugly inside.
Nationalism protects native men and women and with both, culture. That’s it.
They feel entitled to women, including a good wife after they rack up STDs. They’re male SATC-ers, they wanna ‘Have it All’.
They have player burnout and blame the world they ruined themselves for monogamy. Pussy Parade wore them out. They weakened their pair bonding and have various addictions and diseases and psychiatric complaints now.
“They talk about women like we aren’t also suffering.”
We’re no more spoiled by modern culture than they are.
That’s what culture means.
Oh, we have Tindr? So you don’t have an account? Hetero sex literally takes two, don’t claim hypoagency at us.
“disturbing propaganda of self-hatred”
but all they care about is blaming the outgroup and their feeeeels
if they were born women, they’d be SJWs
All they have is emotional outbursting, adult tantrums, mantrums.
Does White Sharia need a safe space, you crybabies?
Kidnapping wives didn’t even happen throughout most history, the brothers and other relations would hunt down the thief. Even in tribal times, men need to earn female approval.
They can’t do this. They blame all women.
They fail to meet a standard of a single one of us, but it’s our fault, right?
I saw on a blog and mentioned here, they want Affirmative Action for sex, for losers who don’t want to marry and reproduce.
You’re entitled to nothing.
Gorilla-dick Mike Cernovich married a brown Muslim and he’s going on about a white future for Europe.
Will your children be white, Mikey?
Purge the degenerate manwhores, while you’re bitching about thots but also, somehow, women aren’t attracted to your groups?
They’re black pill, we’re white. Pure white pill. Positive futures, people.
You can’t invent anything new to go back in time culturally. They’re dense.
You need to be traditionalist or you can’t claim to be traditional, duh. Nobody will follow perverts.
Meanwhile the real Alt Right are out doing stuff and defending Europe.

https://www.salon.com/2017/06/05/europes-alt-right-launches-campaign-to-chase-down-refugee-boats-at-sea-quickly-raises-100000/
http://trib.al/Wf8eADa

 

Why do people think blogs are nice?

They’re not.

They shouldn’t be.

If you’re saying something on the internet, it’s probably realistic and gritty.

That’s seldom nice.

Blogs are for people who vaguely hate themselves because maintaining one is like chasing a toddler.

..Have you ever tried that? I’d rather herd cats or do makeovers for SJWs.

I’m not going back to the old posting format of rambling about nothing in particular because too much is Happening.jpeg but the splinter of outgrouping reactions I get is like a case study in projection.

But it isn’t personal. That is literally the entire point.

I don’t wanna be an internet celebrity based on my sex or any other bullshit. I don’t want to be a target from both sides of a nonsense war. I don’t want the shekels to sell out my good name. I want to be able to change my mind without a corporate pimp breathing down my blouse.
I want a vaguely normal life but to share certain opinions with people who might be searching.

We should be able to criticize anyone without coming up with the most superficial shit about them (their sex, their race, their sexuality) and maybe those things have meaning in context, and individual examples, but I sincerely hope it isn’t all we are.

As a species.

Just a series of pigeonholes and stereotypes.

A line of t-shirts with different victim group logos.

Otherwise, why are we here? Why bother?

Since every fucking group is claiming to be a victim group nowadays – even the straight white men.

At that point, where is the line?

Like, men have a lot going for them biologically, so for the ones with some of the best odds based on success/life outcome studies to start bitching, while also decrying ‘victim culture’, I’m a tad confused by the whole business.

It isn’t just the weak ones, the normies are starting up too. For real.

It isn’t a class thing either, which may be justifiable on economic grounds. They’re literally doing meninism as a serious movement. But… also trying to claim innate superiority, which cannot be revoked by societal circumstance…

The status signals are basically a crosshatch at this point. A big grey goo blob of FA.

It’s a clusterfuck. I think the initial signals were a joke, a counter, then some fools got a taste for it and started doing the MRA, MGTOW pity-me party shit we were mocking the feminists for.

…That’s social justice. If you have their emotional appeal tactics, you are one of them.

Regardless who you claim to be signalling for, yourself or others. Otherwise, Emma Watson would be racist. By the current rulebook. But since SJWs can signal for their own group AND get offended on behalf of others, it doesn’t mash or stick.

You’ll never be included in their considerations, guys. The game is deliberately rigged against you. That’s why I’m so harsh on the topics, not men per se, because there are soft reasons to go about it but playing according to the enemy’s rulebook makes me doubt IQ findings. Is this the WEIRD set of societies or not?

If the best Western Man can do is to sit there crying into his fucking cornflakes?

Did the meany feminists take your rights away?

Our elders from the war generations would be disgraced. Where’s the verve?

Aside from blaming all women for a problem that wasn’t even instituted by women (cough Cultural Marxism cough), they also make various sexist errors to their own sex i.e. all men who don’t think like us are cucks (misuse of term) and get super-triggered if you question them, even to point out minor issues, politely.

If you’re as triggered as the Third Wavers, no wonder people are turning off from your message.

What kind of masculinity is that? It has nothing to do with your sex. That’s actually really sexist to assume, that your entire group has to think as one. Stand alone with your opinion or don’t bother.

I also remark on female topics of course but despite the popularity of them (that one bloody make-up article) nobody starts accusing me of various -isms. As if these words mean anything, let alone when applied to rather humble critiques that few people will ever care to read.

People cannot read something, comprehend it and move on with their life anymore.

I’m not about to get suckered into ‘debates’ with randos in the comments either. It’s on the About page, I don’t expect anyone to care for my opinions and vice versa. They’re just kinda here.

I laugh at some of my old ones. I have no issue with other people taking shots at me, as long as they’re fair. I have taken down three posts from public view and here’s why.

  1. He was a prick but he quickly realized. He advocated for domestic abuse in marriage… despite being a lifelong bachelor. I still have his records in case he acts up again and he knows this.
  2. Two versions of the same post I still get people trying to access. While the girl was an SJW, she made some silly comments as a teenager on Youtube and when I found out she was trying a non-political career in music and my results came up on the first page of Google, I thought that wasn’t morally right, it wasn’t cricket, so I messaged her on tumblr (obviously) and told her I’d taken just those main ones off public because I do believe it’s wrong to ruin someone’s career over their belief system, even if they oppose mine.

I don’t reserve any group from criticism because we’re all human and that’s exactly the way it fucking should be.

Showing sympathy to an outgroup doesn’t make me one, either. It’s absurd reasoning from the people claiming to be ‘rational’. The quality level has really gone down since this stuff was underground. Could be black ops but I fear not.

Too many entryists who haven’t intellectually matured to fully engage in the topics.

And they don’t get the jokes either. Not just mine, unPC humour in general is difficult for them.

Like, if I had to nominate an unofficial soundtrack for this blog, it’d be this.

Because I don’t pull punches regardless of target, even if they’re in My Group, if they’re pulling stupid shit, I will reserve the right to take the piss out of them.

This used to be normal. I’m not special for doing this.

The hypocrisy card doesn’t work on me because I also prey on my own group with similar attitudes. I’m not upset about this turn of events, overall bemused.

You can hate me, as long as you don’t hate all women or white people using me as an excuse. That sort of common sense would be pleasant. Have some goddamn perspective yourself, while you’re slagging off whoever for the same charge or don’t be shocked when people laugh at your ‘measured’ opinions in person. As if I should entertain specious reasoning because you happen to share certain biological or social traits!

What?!

Yet, I’m called a feminist by the right wing (like they don’t rely on meritocracy for capitalism), a Nazi by the feminists (I don’t even) and so on… like, at this point, it says more about the specific posts they choose to read into. Disapproving of one person’s actions or opinions isn’t the same as invalidating their existence.

You can be a dick. You have every right. People can also notice and take the piss for it.

Why are people so touchy?

I’ve linked to people trying to slag me off, I think it’s hilarious. Nobody really cares, guys.

Can we blame tumblr?

I guess it’s too mainstream.

Blogs are supposed to be crappy, they’re online diaries. That’s part of the entertainment value, that they’re life without the filters and varnishes of regular social media.

Imagine how silly you’ll feel on your deathbed getting riled up by a blog post.

Either it’s true, in which case be grateful I didn’t prolong your ignorance or it’s untrue, in which case, see it as snappy and ironic. Because that’s probably what I intended.

I’m hardly about to explain every joke or reference I make, it’s exclusive deliberately.

Not getting a joke doesn’t make you stupid.

I can’t believe I have to type this.

You disagree?

Write your own damn blog.

I’m not playing World War B like many of them, trying to outsignal how edgy they are.
Women don’t care about that ‘macho’ shit.
I’m winging it, and that’s why they keep copying me. New material.

I’ve seen certain people with larger audiences lift vast tracts of my opinions or subject choice.

Well, at least the ideas are getting out but a wee bit of credit would be nice, ya jerks.

I’m not going to tell you to stop having your opinions even if I think you’re totally, 100% wrong. In fact, I welcome it. Gives me something to laugh at and feel smug about. Let everyone hear what you think, doesn’t change the facts or my mind, if the same ‘logic’ previously failed.

People have tried to go after me, but not for very long. What’s the point? IRL, you wouldn’t recognize me on TV either.

I’m not what people expect, like many young people seeing through media machinations for the first time. The internet is different. I’ts supposed to be.

The anon comments I get here are insane, they all sound the same. They think I haven’t heard their particular lies before. If that were true, I’d be writing on here about those, wouldn’t I? If they were so novel to me.

I won’t start on the ones who try to chat me up, impress or neg me.

Aside from those creeps?

I don’t mind most of this. I’m used to being ahead of my time.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I have to see a man about rigging an election.

Cheerio.

Comic: Intersectional Feminism

United we stand…

the real joke?

They’re all claiming to be the Biggest Victim. They’re literally all losers.

Cultural Marxism is finally turning on its henchman and proving, among other things, that multiculturalism doesn’t work. There will always be competing genetic interests. The intersectionalists are calling for segregation. Just like the trans-acceptance ones wanted to end the very concept of ‘Woman’ as an exclusive signalling claim.

Video: not an argument

People miss how beautiful that expression is. However, in specific cases, they should be able to break it down precisely why or they themselves have no reply, no argument, simply an assertion.
You have no requirement to answer a non-question, it’s a habit of socializing that we speak upon the completion of a sentence, it doesn’t require that sentence have merit. The Burden of Proof rests on the initial speaker, still.

Yet it can’t be used to outright deny or dismiss without having a specific reason why.


Meanwhile, the only way to effectively deal with r-types, ignore them, however loudly they scream.

See Best Post.


You only protect your own, but they have made it clear they are against you. Don’t lift a finger.
They say strength is bad until they want you to use it on their behalf.

Hey, if they’re so strong without their weapons, if their arguments have the same calibre as a bullet, go right on ahead and let them stand independently, you oppressive shitlord, and die that way if necessary. It’s what they would’ve wanted.

If evil imports evil, what is there to save?

Yourself, is the answer to that question.

Self-interest is rational. Pathological altruism is insanity.
You help those who would help you, the other side of the golden rule. Darwin’s rules. Sacrifice for people who would sacrifice you is patriotism dialed up to the incredible level of a cartoon character.

I swear most of Molly’s job is talking down the autistic from their pedestal of self-righteous stupidity.
If anyone deserves the Rasputin treatment, it’s a terrorist. Thankfully, your taxes go to pay people with guns already. The Parliament attacker guy? Shot, if memory serves, by a white guy with glasses. In a country that stupidly restricted guns. Even we don’t need you, Gun Bro. If the State can’t do the basic thing of shooting the bad guys for us…

I’ve never, ever heard of a liberal defending a conservative from any attack, ever.
Anyone?
They are not like you. They do not like you. Partially because you would defend them, implicitly stating they’re too weak to do it themselves. If you respect them as adults, leave them be. Let them live (and die) free. You are not their precious State, you have no duty to them, you are not getting paid, that is not your job ~z-snap~. You can’t play hero to two villains. They have engineered this setup on purpose. By importing violent left-wingers, they get the distraction to sneak off (reward of cowardice: survival) and the claim to victory (reward of victory). They literally do not lose.

If they don’t value their own safety, why should you?
America is too diverse to be united. You have the Diverse States of America.

He’s wrong about signalling (thinking) as a sign of tribe. Anyone can signal, its value is nil. How many of those diverse callers would help him, if he needed it? The odds are against, aren’t they? There are plenty of r-types signalling K as the idea spreads to new groups and creeps into mainstream awareness. The other day I heard a random cafe-owner say, “I want to protect this country, I’m like a wolf.” R-types invade by signalling. It’s a social invasion, they’re the fifth column, the barbarians sacking Rome from the inside, a swarm of locusts crying out as they hit you. History has taught us the hard way that ideological unity comes from genetic homogeneity.
The culture war is one of ideas. The weapon is a meme. A tiny little piece of information, a snippet of truth.

Signallers are, more often than not, liars.

They signal whatever ‘virtue’ is powerful, hoping for scraps from that table.

They are the begging dogs of society, asking you to hunt for them. It’s like every time Roosh calls for “someone! do something!” and his little internet boyfriends scurry to rescue the damsel and White Knights whatever he asks for. What are you, his wife? At least “think of the children!” defends the helpless. Adults have no business defending other adults. They rise and fall on their own merit, raised or dashed on their own petard.
K-society says: They do it themselves or it doesn’t get done.
R-society? It’s very espionage, ultra deceptive.
They offer you friendship while holding a knife in their other hand. They extend an olive branch first because it’s less effort, not because they like you or believe in the healing power of metaphor. There is a bargain they author, that you never asked for, and if you don’t like it, the carrot, they’ll ‘offer’ the stick. This is called a con. Con artists rely on confidence and trust. Virtue signallers rely on confidence and trust…

They want control over you, that is their power, to wiggle you like a little puppet.

In a victim culture, they are the biggest victims. In a K-shift, they are magically K-leaning.
Occam says: It’s all a lie.

I warned you, years ago. I knew these interlopers would pop up like fleas.
They don’t mind you dancing the right-wing jig as long as it’s to their exact tune.

Guess which is which.

If your friends are your enemies, you’ll never succeed. How to test?

A k-type invented the expression: actions speak louder than words. Until I see you sacrifice for this tribe, it owes nothing to you. If all you have are words, speak to the birds.

Just because someone is smoke-signalling your tribe doesn’t mean they’re on your side. Indeed, this makes it less likely, a friend doesn’t feel the need to keep reminding you they’re not a foe, not a threat, like they’re anticipating something…

DO NOT TRUST A DODGY SIGNAL.

The incongruence should ping to you. What’s in it for you?

In the super-complex theories of strategy, this is called A Trap. It’s a primitive form of distraction by claiming Ally while wearing the coat of your enemy to cuckold him for whatever reason before attacking when factors are on your side and you can turn your coat back and show your true colours. This is the problem with games like chess, where the colours never change sides because they were bribed or got bored. You never get betrayed in chess because the enemy never falters and it’s all very polite and open, two equal lines fairly opposing one another with Queensberry rules. That was 2nd generation warfare, we’re on four. Then again, maybe it’s a commentary on the reality that a leopard can’t change its spots. Who knows? I certainly don’t.

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/226350.html
“Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.”
They don’t fully quote it for some strange reason. The Bible is actually very witty.

Ask – why do they want your trust? Why aren’t they doing literally anything else? What’s their game? 

It’s a great way to buy time when you know you’d lose in a fair fight.

aka cheating

If this was the 15th century, a ship running up your flag is probably pirates.

And they won’t kill you with rum.

Newsflash: BAD GUYS LIE. THEY LIE OR THEY WON’T FOOL YOU LONG ENOUGH TO WIN.

Back to terrorism. All the way back, centuries and centuries and centuries, like the ideas.

Self-proclaimed liberals have a lot in common with the mythological ‘moderate Muslim’; that is to say, they will claim to be loving and giving until they have power and numbers to be the opposite of those things.

The ‘American Indian’ only gave with the expectation of receiving more in future.

A liberal is a dictator waiting to happen. Biding their time until everyone else has disarmed and made nice.
They know exactly what they are doing. That is what guys like these do not get. Everyone else is slowly waking up. We make memes.

comment
“So if I’m understanding Stefan’s argument correctly it is: “While you certainly have the right to defend yourself, you have zero obligation to defend anyone else against a threat.” Is that the argument you are taking issue with? If so, what is your counterargument? If there is an obligation to defend others where does it come from?”
They want all conservatives to rush to protect them, like the police. While we are occupied, they survive and screw over the next batch of rueful idiots. The type who, at the Gates of Saint Peter, would claim the moral victory is more important.
The self-styled ‘liberals’ scoff at loyalty to children, nuclear family and country… until it comes to discussions of noblesse oblige (without class???), pensions, the social contract and human rights (without property rights). Then it’s all about universalism, collectivism and helping those who can’t/won’t help themselves. They are morally relative, liberal with logic ….wrong, in bad faith (100% deliberate). What they say is usually ‘not an argument’ because it comes from a hypocrite (no-proof), a deceiver (valid use, not ad hominem) and they argue it from bad faith, really pushing something else entirely under the radar.

They are loyal to their own body, especially the neck. They don’t want to save the pandas, they want to save their own skin.

In common speech here, they’re ‘trying it on’ i.e. they know they’re lying to get what they want and disappear when their half comes due, but they’re hoping you don’t know that.

All their virtue signals are overt pleas to get, without giving. 

Argument and clause. Devil and detail. Plan and plot.

Essentially it’s;
>HELP THE OUTGROUP! THE INDIVIDUAL IS NOTHING TO THE GROUP! SACRIFICE AT ALL COSTS!
>…STOP DEFINING THE INGROUP! THAT MODEL IS REDUNDANT AND EVIL!
and that, my friends, is why we mock them.
See: Why mockery?

It is also why you shouldn’t trust ambassadors. 300 was right.

That diverse cast of people calling into Molyneux are attempting to appease him while he gains power (they smell a whiff and cannot yet crush him) and then to advise him to his destruction once he has gained it (and after they have gained his trust). That is what high-IQ r-types DO. The toxic friends of the world. The fairweather traitors and degenerate preachers.

Clinically, they have many names. Sociopath tops the list.

Question a normal person: #crickets

Question a sociopath: you are (lie), (lie) and (lie), evil person! Appease me! Account for your sin!

They’ve found a scapegoat to slaughter.

Sociopaths especially detest those who describe their tactics to the masses for protection.

You can’t defame the truth, though, can you?