White Sharia is anti-white

Do I…. do I really have to explain.

They’ve made a laughing stock and jumped the shark.

It’ll never happen, but it’s a dysgenic meme.

Still genocidal, to civilized culture.
Turning on white women, calling for us to lose all Western First World rights that our forefathers died for (so we wouldn’t get raped by Vikings and other tribes), joking about rape and torture (but male rape and gang rape are terrible?) and bitching when women say it isn’t funny, it’s crazy?
Gee, why has the Alt Right lost credibility since the misogynists transitioned over from Roosh V and the other manwhores who’d be stoned to death for touching another man’s property?

To say white women betrayed the West is simply ignorant, most of the politicians were male. Most cucks are male. Most of the left’s voters skew male, at least here.

This isn’t a sex issue, and if it were, the issue if with the weakness of their own sex.
Wanna ban birth control? Then who will sleep with you? They are morons, they don’t even see the consequences to their basic policy ‘beliefs’ because they’re all cucking for their e-celeb mancrushes and whatever shit they’re trying to push to sell you get rich quick crap. You can’t joke about the three main crimes: theft, rape and murder. Torture is out of the question. Why? We are civilized.
And they wonder why, in all their instability, women reject them?

You find our rape and torture funny when you should be angry? Ingroup preference? Racial loyalty?
These fake Nazi fags are just shock value dudebros.
It’s like insulting any woman who dares show interest and then complaining any movement is a sausage fest…
Yes. Your toxic persona will do that.
It’s false equivalence to paint Sharia as Patriarchy. They need to weaken women because they cannot cooperate.
“White Sharia represents a real threat to white women and I think it’s promoting violence against us.”
Joking about female circumcision?
Womb envy is real.
But they oppose male circumcision?
Yah, when they get upset over any kind of Male Victimhood Narrative, remember, white men are never victims if they’re superior.
Tongue removals? What kind of sick human being thinks of this stuff?
“We wanna torture them but them get off on it”
OK, yeah, arrest them.
They need to be in an asylum. I’ve heard less insanity from people in hospital prison facilities.
“We wanna dominate them, humiliate them so they can get really really horny and really really pregnant”
Freud wants to talk to you about your Oedipus complex.
Any man who wants to beat a woman is weak.
These are the misogynists that predate feminism.
The ones who want to ‘whip’ women for being female.
You don’t let sadists run a prosocial movement.
This is why I’m for traditionalism and Neoreaction.
Not one sadist.
Some slightly deluded men, but none of them are cruel or sociopathic. Can’t say the same about the PUA/MRA/MGTOW set that see women as the Enemy.
If you see white women as the enemy, not only are you a misogynist but also a race traitor. Yeah. Logically. Technically, that’s exactly it. Our enemies pushing abortion and birth control want men to hate women and blame women instead of those who brought about these dysgenic policies.
Not one of them will get to use ‘sexist’ in shrill tones as a silencing tactic again.
You wanted white enslavement. Any white enslavement.
White slavery would’ve been a better meme but that doesn’t involve their dick and it’s already happened.
They want to lose Western rights but claim to defend the west
They want to enslave white women…. to protect white women?


People who think this infiltrated the Alt Right to turn us against one another. Congratulations, you cuck or are cucked by picking up this idea to ruin your reputation.
She’s right, they’re atheist because they believe the Atheistkult narrative about Christianity being the same as Islam or Judaism, who really do treat women like that. So to hate Jews, they wanna treat White women like Jewish men treat Orthodox Jewish women. Whether or not they believe in Hell, they’re going to it. Jesus never laid a hand on any woman.
I said the AR was too popular and something must be coming to destroy it.
Yeah, let it burn. Let it change. It needs it.
Let it cut out this cancer that hates half the white native population of Europe.
They sound very herp-derp (9 minutes in).
They’re historically ignorant too. This reminds me of Roosh admitting he wants rape to be legal then backtracking to claim it was satire.
You can’t be both serious and kidding. Men were held to far more standards in Patriarchy than women. Men have to wear head coverings too, you must’ve learnt differently in America, which is known to get history wrong for Narrative. It’s in their interest to portray traditional men as superior when they were dominant – different thing, they had more duties and responsibilities, like dying in battle. You don’t get to shirk your duties and enslave women, that system could never work.
Sharia only really works in low IQ societies from inbreeding, which Sharia encourages.
Do you want inbred kids? Can you afford to be any dumber?
Doesn’t matter though since no sane woman will ever breed with these degenerate scumbags.
Only r-types rape. It’s their strategy. White men chose the higher path because they loved their daughters as much as their sons. Fashions differ by culture and time and nuns choose the veil as a symbol but not all the time. Men took the cloth and wore hoods, it’s nothing to do with women being ashamed of their femininity, which is what they want and anti-traditional. Women still wear hats, men wore most hats, idiots. Women used to work and still do – working in the field, cooking and babysitting are all jobs. There were female philosophers, writers, mathematicians, accountants, shop workers.. how ignorant is the USA not to know this?
I’ve never seen a European seriously claim this.
Islam isn’t a religion, it’s a war manual. It kills culture, these people must be saboteurs.
“You don’t save your culture by adopting an alien culture” A+
Renaissances? Scientific and Industrial Revolutions? Wanna keep them? You need to keep Christian, agnostic or atheist. You can’t force someone to believe, the others must be a choice, especially if you want the STEM advancements based on skepticism. Global warming rhetoric is based on blasphemy narratives.
“too dumb to figure out how their own culture works?” Yes.
Atomized, alienated, ignorant. They need traditionalism but seek to imitate Arabs because…They’ve been doing so well?
Personally, I think they just want to fuck their cousin and feel good about it.
“Why sow division among your own?” SHE GETS IT!
They’re all degenerates projecting onto women like Lilith – a JEWISH archetype. Hey, you fornicated and that’s your fault, your consensual choice, don’t blame the women!
“You may as well wave the white flag of surrender cos it’s gonna be the only white thing left soon!”
I love this woman.
These subverters are using the Left’s linguistic tricks, giving the Left power – can you tell they’re socialists?
Language has power, all the Left agrees. They’re adopting and cucking for MENA.
I think I know why.
They want to avoid the draft. They want to reject their duty to fight for their culture.
So they go on and on and on about ‘da women’ and ‘hahaha rape is their fault’ and ‘women should defend themselves’ – no, that isn’t how the West works at all. Why have police if we must defend ourselves? Police are the embodiment of Western chivalry. Chivalry made the West great – but the men weren’t weak. I linked to Evola and it’s true what he said – if the women are weak, it’s because of the men.
Bowing down to Saudis because a Twitter SJW was mean to you is cucking. It’s what the terrorist-defenders do.
They’ve been saying Deus vult and realised shit, they’d be the ones needing to fight for it.
They might have to brush the Cheeto dust off their keyboard! Prove themselves!
So they turn their back on their own culture’s duties and replace it with one for cowards. Islamic State are scared of women too, especially being killed by one. People like Molyneux paid lip service to blaming all women like more victim culture will save us, but he’s happily married. Same with Vox Day. Maybe they’re just telling you basement-dwelling atheists what you wanna hear for clicks?
“These guys sound like Crypto-Muslims”
I doubt most are white.
They wanna be the oppressed ones so badly but the invasion of the EU has made it clear white women are the victims.
They’re talking about ‘harems’, they’re Roosh V cultists. Under polygamy, most men don’t breed. They don’t marry or have sex.
Sexual violence has never been part of Europe excepting de Sade, a hard left writer. He’s pathological. Sexual violence is taught in pornography and by MENA – all those Arabs and Africans they supposedly hate.
Sexual violence was also used by Muslims in war against men – the conquered were forced to fellate their victors, or were anally raped by them, or a trained dog while they’re bent over a chair. This still happens and it’s why non-hetero sex is actually a form of humiliation as well as medically bad for you (STDs, cancer risk, tearing etc). In Afghanistan they reported these sickos raped little boys.
That’s what they’re calling on. Pedophilia. How are they better than the rape gangs again? Milo and Roosh brought in these people. They will never get married happily and raise healthy offspring, they’re trash. Reminder who Roosh really is….


How do they assert high ground? Their moral authority has disappeared because they like unhealthy porn.
“White Sharia comes across as a cover for their misogyny and such sexual aggression”
They believe the lies about divorce and alpha bro shit. Many are themselves brown and therefore despise whites, that’s why so many Alt Right male writers also worship Roosh, they’re not white, they’re playing whites off against one another.
They are the Muh Dicks we used to mock.
“How are you a real man if you have to be coy and manipulative with your intentions just like the women you complain about?”
R-selection.
These r-men are complaining about r-women.
They also think they can steal K-women from K-men by pretending it’s traditional.
They’d be stoned to death for rape according to Christianity. And the Bible never said non-virgin men could get married, adultery was punishable by death in both sexes. Prostitution was illegal. All pre-marital sex was rape according to the Bible. They’d be long dead under the Old Testament and I can’t that it’d be a great loss, can you?
Here’s Roosh and his Messiah complex, in case you forgot.

That’s a real photo.
“Are women that bad?”
If they’re whores, why aren’t they sleeping with you?
“Or are you just projecting?”
Yes.
If white women wanted non-white men, they wouldn’t have to rape us.
Rape apologia of any stripe has stripped them of credibility.
The feminists aren’t wrong about everything, rape offends healthy people.
“The only men who support women being raped and forcibly impregnated are men who aren’t capable of providing a safe, secure and loving environment for a woman in which she would willingly want to have children.”
Are they willing to fight her father for her honour? That’s the traditional standard.
Inferiors, socially weak men who want to adopt kleptogamy, the sneaky fucker strategy (lower than beta, actually).
If you cannot convince a single good woman to marry you, (and then breed) the issue is not with women, the failure is you. You’re failures as men. You only need to convince one, that’s the role of your sex, to display. Women select. While we’re calling Naturalistic Fallacy.
“A lot of men would find it emasculating to be reduced to beating up a woman just to get sex.”
Except Roosh, yup. They lie to themselves but the divine can see into their black shriveled hearts.
They’re going first-class to Hell. No love in them.


Logically, if they believe women are physically inferior at everything (not how evolution works) then we should be treated better? These are the weirdos who baby their dog like Paris Hilton, it’s creepy.
They are creepy, that’s why they hate the word. They want to abuse women to feel powerful because they hate themselves.
A lot are male borderlines, who think Dark Triad is cool, it’s really sad but don’t pity it. Psychopaths have average IQ and die miserable and alone. Probably after prison rape.
They think Sharia is glamorous, ew.
“If you have Mommy issues or had a bad relationship-”
Their Asian waifu dumped them.
They will never, ever take responsibility, these Peter Pans. They’re mostly in their 30s, the rabid ones, still blaming women.
Blame Momma for never getting that abortion.
Revenge fantasies are for possibly gamma, more like delta males and all the way down to omega.
This is their version of being the Secret King where everything works out with them on top…
Male narcissism, so they see it in all women.
Therapy won’t help them. They just need to be shot by the real men, and this will probably happen as the nationalists (sharia is globalist) and traditionalists (who don’t want their wives and daughters raped) rise. They have nothing to offer and that’s why they fear genuinely right-wing people.
These people are useless eaters bitching on podcasts. That’s why I don’t go on them, toxic negative people. Black pill BS.
No dreams, aspirations or visions. Their ancestors would be sick.
They don’t believe in corrective rape, it’s just revenge because women dared, DARED to reject them.
…Rejection is a fact of life, women are fully acquainted with it. Have you never been rejected from a job application?
It’s nothing to do with sex. These guys are victim culture but too chickenshit to remove kebab, if they believed in God, which they clearly do not.
“Their intent is to prey on women who had terrible childhoods [not all r-types, actually] and are already traumatized and abuse them further, while telling themselves that they’re somehow doing the right thing by her”
As r-types they wanted UNGUARDED women. Terrible childhood is code for ‘defended by no one’, easy prey.
They’re sexual predators. As I’ve been warning you.
The women will just take botanicals to abort or throw themselves down stairs than keep the children of these degenerate white trash, if they are white. Women have all the power to choose their baby-making, that’s why we nurse. They simply won’t lactate, as can happen under stress, and the baby will die naturally. This happens and it works, but takes a few weeks. They still won’t breed. According to the Parental Investment theory, good men are rewarded evolutionally and their spawn survive at a rate above, that’s why we evolved the monogamous family unit. You can’t beat the cow and expect it to produce milk. It’ll sour. They know nothing of nature, completely disconnected like the SJWs they cry.
Ask a farmer. You can’t even mildly spook hens or they stop laying eggs for ages.
This is nature, it’s protective. Women also develop amenorrhea during stress – they don’t ovulate. They don’t produce sexual fluids much either so raping them wouldn’t be like consensual sex, if you could get it in, it would hurt and you’d probably get stuck because she clamped down from fear. It would be rather easy to cut it off from that angle while he’s trapped inside.
Men get trapped inside all the time when it’s consensual. Read a book.

Nature hates you.

Not to mention the scarring of rape itself frequently makes women infertile, and that’s just one instance.
Look at the Iceland strike of the 1970s, women fight back. You need us, bitches.
You can’t claim to be better than Muslims when you’re bragging about craving the stuff they already do to little girls to this day, in places like Rotherham and many besides.
“We’re supposed to believe that this is alpha behaviour? I don’t think so.”
A man is too busy running his business and helping at home to bitch online to childless bachelors.
“This meme is incredibly degenerate, which is really hypocritical coming from guys who claim to be the thot patrol, and how is this better than Hollywood? If they’re happy being degenerate, why are on the right?”
See: The hypocrisy of the signalling right and my other one about fake Christian cucks who want to defile all women but then preach about how good and pure they are with a false conversion in their thirties. They are not right-wing. Know them by their fruit. Sex with anyone but their wife? Left-wing.
I warned ages ago that they’re trying to cuck the right and turn men against women.
Roosh started it.
He’s anti-white, what do you expect?
God will purge when the economy collapses and please God, let these cruel, spiteful, vindictive, evil ones be sacrament.
“It’s causing division on the right, it’s a Trojan horse from misogynistic men to push their agenda. They aren’t nationalists, nationalism is about love. You can’t call yourself a nationalist when you have such contempt for half your race.”

A summary of what we do, exactly that. Stop the self-hate. Big up the self-love.


She said it! They’re the ‘self-aware r-types’ trying to slow K-shift’s roll. It is literally half and you’re not entitled to another man’s daughter. At least, you need to be able to ‘keep’ her, financially, and fully. They cannot do this, most can’t even afford to support themselves solo or get married. They’re losers. They say men should be the Breadwinner but also it’s ‘superficial’ for women to value that trait? Shallow to judge a man by whether he can support you? No, that’s traditional. Like men looking for fertility and looks. Both look for character too but they ignore this because they’re ugly inside.
Nationalism protects native men and women and with both, culture. That’s it.
They feel entitled to women, including a good wife after they rack up STDs. They’re male SATC-ers, they wanna ‘Have it All’.
They have player burnout and blame the world they ruined themselves for monogamy. Pussy Parade wore them out. They weakened their pair bonding and have various addictions and diseases and psychiatric complaints now.
“They talk about women like we aren’t also suffering.”
We’re no more spoiled by modern culture than they are.
That’s what culture means.
Oh, we have Tindr? So you don’t have an account? Hetero sex literally takes two, don’t claim hypoagency at us.
“disturbing propaganda of self-hatred”
but all they care about is blaming the outgroup and their feeeeels
if they were born women, they’d be SJWs
All they have is emotional outbursting, adult tantrums, mantrums.
Does White Sharia need a safe space, you crybabies?
Kidnapping wives didn’t even happen throughout most history, the brothers and other relations would hunt down the thief. Even in tribal times, men need to earn female approval.
They can’t do this. They blame all women.
They fail to meet a standard of a single one of us, but it’s our fault, right?
I saw on a blog and mentioned here, they want Affirmative Action for sex, for losers who don’t want to marry and reproduce.
You’re entitled to nothing.
Gorilla-dick Mike Cernovich married a brown Muslim and he’s going on about a white future for Europe.
Will your children be white, Mikey?
Purge the degenerate manwhores, while you’re bitching about thots but also, somehow, women aren’t attracted to your groups?
They’re black pill, we’re white. Pure white pill. Positive futures, people.
You can’t invent anything new to go back in time culturally. They’re dense.
You need to be traditionalist or you can’t claim to be traditional, duh. Nobody will follow perverts.
Meanwhile the real Alt Right are out doing stuff and defending Europe.

https://www.salon.com/2017/06/05/europes-alt-right-launches-campaign-to-chase-down-refugee-boats-at-sea-quickly-raises-100000/
http://trib.al/Wf8eADa

 

Why do people think blogs are nice?

They’re not.

They shouldn’t be.

If you’re saying something on the internet, it’s probably realistic and gritty.

That’s seldom nice.

Blogs are for people who vaguely hate themselves because maintaining one is like chasing a toddler.

..Have you ever tried that? I’d rather herd cats or do makeovers for SJWs.

I’m not going back to the old posting format of rambling about nothing in particular because too much is Happening.jpeg but the splinter of outgrouping reactions I get is like a case study in projection.

But it isn’t personal. That is literally the entire point.

I don’t wanna be an internet celebrity based on my sex or any other bullshit. I don’t want to be a target from both sides of a nonsense war. I don’t want the shekels to sell out my good name. I want to be able to change my mind without a corporate pimp breathing down my blouse.
I want a vaguely normal life but to share certain opinions with people who might be searching.

We should be able to criticize anyone without coming up with the most superficial shit about them (their sex, their race, their sexuality) and maybe those things have meaning in context, and individual examples, but I sincerely hope it isn’t all we are.

As a species.

Just a series of pigeonholes and stereotypes.

A line of t-shirts with different victim group logos.

Otherwise, why are we here? Why bother?

Since every fucking group is claiming to be a victim group nowadays – even the straight white men.

At that point, where is the line?

Like, men have a lot going for them biologically, so for the ones with some of the best odds based on success/life outcome studies to start bitching, while also decrying ‘victim culture’, I’m a tad confused by the whole business.

It isn’t just the weak ones, the normies are starting up too. For real.

It isn’t a class thing either, which may be justifiable on economic grounds. They’re literally doing meninism as a serious movement. But… also trying to claim innate superiority, which cannot be revoked by societal circumstance…

The status signals are basically a crosshatch at this point. A big grey goo blob of FA.

It’s a clusterfuck. I think the initial signals were a joke, a counter, then some fools got a taste for it and started doing the MRA, MGTOW pity-me party shit we were mocking the feminists for.

…That’s social justice. If you have their emotional appeal tactics, you are one of them.

Regardless who you claim to be signalling for, yourself or others. Otherwise, Emma Watson would be racist. By the current rulebook. But since SJWs can signal for their own group AND get offended on behalf of others, it doesn’t mash or stick.

You’ll never be included in their considerations, guys. The game is deliberately rigged against you. That’s why I’m so harsh on the topics, not men per se, because there are soft reasons to go about it but playing according to the enemy’s rulebook makes me doubt IQ findings. Is this the WEIRD set of societies or not?

If the best Western Man can do is to sit there crying into his fucking cornflakes?

Did the meany feminists take your rights away?

Our elders from the war generations would be disgraced. Where’s the verve?

Aside from blaming all women for a problem that wasn’t even instituted by women (cough Cultural Marxism cough), they also make various sexist errors to their own sex i.e. all men who don’t think like us are cucks (misuse of term) and get super-triggered if you question them, even to point out minor issues, politely.

If you’re as triggered as the Third Wavers, no wonder people are turning off from your message.

What kind of masculinity is that? It has nothing to do with your sex. That’s actually really sexist to assume, that your entire group has to think as one. Stand alone with your opinion or don’t bother.

I also remark on female topics of course but despite the popularity of them (that one bloody make-up article) nobody starts accusing me of various -isms. As if these words mean anything, let alone when applied to rather humble critiques that few people will ever care to read.

People cannot read something, comprehend it and move on with their life anymore.

I’m not about to get suckered into ‘debates’ with randos in the comments either. It’s on the About page, I don’t expect anyone to care for my opinions and vice versa. They’re just kinda here.

I laugh at some of my old ones. I have no issue with other people taking shots at me, as long as they’re fair. I have taken down three posts from public view and here’s why.

  1. He was a prick but he quickly realized. He advocated for domestic abuse in marriage… despite being a lifelong bachelor. I still have his records in case he acts up again and he knows this.
  2. Two versions of the same post I still get people trying to access. While the girl was an SJW, she made some silly comments as a teenager on Youtube and when I found out she was trying a non-political career in music and my results came up on the first page of Google, I thought that wasn’t morally right, it wasn’t cricket, so I messaged her on tumblr (obviously) and told her I’d taken just those main ones off public because I do believe it’s wrong to ruin someone’s career over their belief system, even if they oppose mine.

I don’t reserve any group from criticism because we’re all human and that’s exactly the way it fucking should be.

Showing sympathy to an outgroup doesn’t make me one, either. It’s absurd reasoning from the people claiming to be ‘rational’. The quality level has really gone down since this stuff was underground. Could be black ops but I fear not.

Too many entryists who haven’t intellectually matured to fully engage in the topics.

And they don’t get the jokes either. Not just mine, unPC humour in general is difficult for them.

Like, if I had to nominate an unofficial soundtrack for this blog, it’d be this.

Because I don’t pull punches regardless of target, even if they’re in My Group, if they’re pulling stupid shit, I will reserve the right to take the piss out of them.

This used to be normal. I’m not special for doing this.

The hypocrisy card doesn’t work on me because I also prey on my own group with similar attitudes. I’m not upset about this turn of events, overall bemused.

You can hate me, as long as you don’t hate all women or white people using me as an excuse. That sort of common sense would be pleasant. Have some goddamn perspective yourself, while you’re slagging off whoever for the same charge or don’t be shocked when people laugh at your ‘measured’ opinions in person. As if I should entertain specious reasoning because you happen to share certain biological or social traits!

What?!

Yet, I’m called a feminist by the right wing (like they don’t rely on meritocracy for capitalism), a Nazi by the feminists (I don’t even) and so on… like, at this point, it says more about the specific posts they choose to read into. Disapproving of one person’s actions or opinions isn’t the same as invalidating their existence.

You can be a dick. You have every right. People can also notice and take the piss for it.

Why are people so touchy?

I’ve linked to people trying to slag me off, I think it’s hilarious. Nobody really cares, guys.

Can we blame tumblr?

I guess it’s too mainstream.

Blogs are supposed to be crappy, they’re online diaries. That’s part of the entertainment value, that they’re life without the filters and varnishes of regular social media.

Imagine how silly you’ll feel on your deathbed getting riled up by a blog post.

Either it’s true, in which case be grateful I didn’t prolong your ignorance or it’s untrue, in which case, see it as snappy and ironic. Because that’s probably what I intended.

I’m hardly about to explain every joke or reference I make, it’s exclusive deliberately.

Not getting a joke doesn’t make you stupid.

I can’t believe I have to type this.

You disagree?

Write your own damn blog.

I’m not playing World War B like many of them, trying to outsignal how edgy they are.
Women don’t care about that ‘macho’ shit.
I’m winging it, and that’s why they keep copying me. New material.

I’ve seen certain people with larger audiences lift vast tracts of my opinions or subject choice.

Well, at least the ideas are getting out but a wee bit of credit would be nice, ya jerks.

I’m not going to tell you to stop having your opinions even if I think you’re totally, 100% wrong. In fact, I welcome it. Gives me something to laugh at and feel smug about. Let everyone hear what you think, doesn’t change the facts or my mind, if the same ‘logic’ previously failed.

People have tried to go after me, but not for very long. What’s the point? IRL, you wouldn’t recognize me on TV either.

I’m not what people expect, like many young people seeing through media machinations for the first time. The internet is different. I’ts supposed to be.

The anon comments I get here are insane, they all sound the same. They think I haven’t heard their particular lies before. If that were true, I’d be writing on here about those, wouldn’t I? If they were so novel to me.

I won’t start on the ones who try to chat me up, impress or neg me.

Aside from those creeps?

I don’t mind most of this. I’m used to being ahead of my time.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I have to see a man about rigging an election.

Cheerio.

Comic: Intersectional Feminism

United we stand…

the real joke?

They’re all claiming to be the Biggest Victim. They’re literally all losers.

Cultural Marxism is finally turning on its henchman and proving, among other things, that multiculturalism doesn’t work. There will always be competing genetic interests. The intersectionalists are calling for segregation. Just like the trans-acceptance ones wanted to end the very concept of ‘Woman’ as an exclusive signalling claim.

Video: not an argument

People miss how beautiful that expression is. However, in specific cases, they should be able to break it down precisely why or they themselves have no reply, no argument, simply an assertion.
You have no requirement to answer a non-question, it’s a habit of socializing that we speak upon the completion of a sentence, it doesn’t require that sentence have merit. The Burden of Proof rests on the initial speaker, still.

Yet it can’t be used to outright deny or dismiss without having a specific reason why.


Meanwhile, the only way to effectively deal with r-types, ignore them, however loudly they scream.

See Best Post.


You only protect your own, but they have made it clear they are against you. Don’t lift a finger.
They say strength is bad until they want you to use it on their behalf.

Hey, if they’re so strong without their weapons, if their arguments have the same calibre as a bullet, go right on ahead and let them stand independently, you oppressive shitlord, and die that way if necessary. It’s what they would’ve wanted.

If evil imports evil, what is there to save?

Yourself, is the answer to that question.

Self-interest is rational. Pathological altruism is insanity.
You help those who would help you, the other side of the golden rule. Darwin’s rules. Sacrifice for people who would sacrifice you is patriotism dialed up to the incredible level of a cartoon character.

I swear most of Molly’s job is talking down the autistic from their pedestal of self-righteous stupidity.
If anyone deserves the Rasputin treatment, it’s a terrorist. Thankfully, your taxes go to pay people with guns already. The Parliament attacker guy? Shot, if memory serves, by a white guy with glasses. In a country that stupidly restricted guns. Even we don’t need you, Gun Bro. If the State can’t do the basic thing of shooting the bad guys for us…

I’ve never, ever heard of a liberal defending a conservative from any attack, ever.
Anyone?
They are not like you. They do not like you. Partially because you would defend them, implicitly stating they’re too weak to do it themselves. If you respect them as adults, leave them be. Let them live (and die) free. You are not their precious State, you have no duty to them, you are not getting paid, that is not your job ~z-snap~. You can’t play hero to two villains. They have engineered this setup on purpose. By importing violent left-wingers, they get the distraction to sneak off (reward of cowardice: survival) and the claim to victory (reward of victory). They literally do not lose.

If they don’t value their own safety, why should you?
America is too diverse to be united. You have the Diverse States of America.

He’s wrong about signalling (thinking) as a sign of tribe. Anyone can signal, its value is nil. How many of those diverse callers would help him, if he needed it? The odds are against, aren’t they? There are plenty of r-types signalling K as the idea spreads to new groups and creeps into mainstream awareness. The other day I heard a random cafe-owner say, “I want to protect this country, I’m like a wolf.” R-types invade by signalling. It’s a social invasion, they’re the fifth column, the barbarians sacking Rome from the inside, a swarm of locusts crying out as they hit you. History has taught us the hard way that ideological unity comes from genetic homogeneity.
The culture war is one of ideas. The weapon is a meme. A tiny little piece of information, a snippet of truth.

Signallers are, more often than not, liars.

They signal whatever ‘virtue’ is powerful, hoping for scraps from that table.

They are the begging dogs of society, asking you to hunt for them. It’s like every time Roosh calls for “someone! do something!” and his little internet boyfriends scurry to rescue the damsel and White Knights whatever he asks for. What are you, his wife? At least “think of the children!” defends the helpless. Adults have no business defending other adults. They rise and fall on their own merit, raised or dashed on their own petard.
K-society says: They do it themselves or it doesn’t get done.
R-society? It’s very espionage, ultra deceptive.
They offer you friendship while holding a knife in their other hand. They extend an olive branch first because it’s less effort, not because they like you or believe in the healing power of metaphor. There is a bargain they author, that you never asked for, and if you don’t like it, the carrot, they’ll ‘offer’ the stick. This is called a con. Con artists rely on confidence and trust. Virtue signallers rely on confidence and trust…

They want control over you, that is their power, to wiggle you like a little puppet.

In a victim culture, they are the biggest victims. In a K-shift, they are magically K-leaning.
Occam says: It’s all a lie.

I warned you, years ago. I knew these interlopers would pop up like fleas.
They don’t mind you dancing the right-wing jig as long as it’s to their exact tune.

Guess which is which.

If your friends are your enemies, you’ll never succeed. How to test?

A k-type invented the expression: actions speak louder than words. Until I see you sacrifice for this tribe, it owes nothing to you. If all you have are words, speak to the birds.

Just because someone is smoke-signalling your tribe doesn’t mean they’re on your side. Indeed, this makes it less likely, a friend doesn’t feel the need to keep reminding you they’re not a foe, not a threat, like they’re anticipating something…

DO NOT TRUST A DODGY SIGNAL.

The incongruence should ping to you. What’s in it for you?

In the super-complex theories of strategy, this is called A Trap. It’s a primitive form of distraction by claiming Ally while wearing the coat of your enemy to cuckold him for whatever reason before attacking when factors are on your side and you can turn your coat back and show your true colours. This is the problem with games like chess, where the colours never change sides because they were bribed or got bored. You never get betrayed in chess because the enemy never falters and it’s all very polite and open, two equal lines fairly opposing one another with Queensberry rules. That was 2nd generation warfare, we’re on four. Then again, maybe it’s a commentary on the reality that a leopard can’t change its spots. Who knows? I certainly don’t.

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/226350.html
“Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.”
They don’t fully quote it for some strange reason. The Bible is actually very witty.

Ask – why do they want your trust? Why aren’t they doing literally anything else? What’s their game? 

It’s a great way to buy time when you know you’d lose in a fair fight.

aka cheating

If this was the 15th century, a ship running up your flag is probably pirates.

And they won’t kill you with rum.

Newsflash: BAD GUYS LIE. THEY LIE OR THEY WON’T FOOL YOU LONG ENOUGH TO WIN.

Back to terrorism. All the way back, centuries and centuries and centuries, like the ideas.

Self-proclaimed liberals have a lot in common with the mythological ‘moderate Muslim’; that is to say, they will claim to be loving and giving until they have power and numbers to be the opposite of those things.

The ‘American Indian’ only gave with the expectation of receiving more in future.

A liberal is a dictator waiting to happen. Biding their time until everyone else has disarmed and made nice.
They know exactly what they are doing. That is what guys like these do not get. Everyone else is slowly waking up. We make memes.

comment
“So if I’m understanding Stefan’s argument correctly it is: “While you certainly have the right to defend yourself, you have zero obligation to defend anyone else against a threat.” Is that the argument you are taking issue with? If so, what is your counterargument? If there is an obligation to defend others where does it come from?”
They want all conservatives to rush to protect them, like the police. While we are occupied, they survive and screw over the next batch of rueful idiots. The type who, at the Gates of Saint Peter, would claim the moral victory is more important.
The self-styled ‘liberals’ scoff at loyalty to children, nuclear family and country… until it comes to discussions of noblesse oblige (without class???), pensions, the social contract and human rights (without property rights). Then it’s all about universalism, collectivism and helping those who can’t/won’t help themselves. They are morally relative, liberal with logic ….wrong, in bad faith (100% deliberate). What they say is usually ‘not an argument’ because it comes from a hypocrite (no-proof), a deceiver (valid use, not ad hominem) and they argue it from bad faith, really pushing something else entirely under the radar.

They are loyal to their own body, especially the neck. They don’t want to save the pandas, they want to save their own skin.

In common speech here, they’re ‘trying it on’ i.e. they know they’re lying to get what they want and disappear when their half comes due, but they’re hoping you don’t know that.

All their virtue signals are overt pleas to get, without giving. 

Argument and clause. Devil and detail. Plan and plot.

Essentially it’s;
>HELP THE OUTGROUP! THE INDIVIDUAL IS NOTHING TO THE GROUP! SACRIFICE AT ALL COSTS!
>…STOP DEFINING THE INGROUP! THAT MODEL IS REDUNDANT AND EVIL!
and that, my friends, is why we mock them.
See: Why mockery?

It is also why you shouldn’t trust ambassadors. 300 was right.

That diverse cast of people calling into Molyneux are attempting to appease him while he gains power (they smell a whiff and cannot yet crush him) and then to advise him to his destruction once he has gained it (and after they have gained his trust). That is what high-IQ r-types DO. The toxic friends of the world. The fairweather traitors and degenerate preachers.

Clinically, they have many names. Sociopath tops the list.

Question a normal person: #crickets

Question a sociopath: you are (lie), (lie) and (lie), evil person! Appease me! Account for your sin!

They’ve found a scapegoat to slaughter.

Sociopaths especially detest those who describe their tactics to the masses for protection.

You can’t defame the truth, though, can you?

Black man Holocaust mashup

I wonder if the black one knows about black genocide and the wealth inequality of the Jews that continue to this day. He probably does but I’d have mentioned it.

I don’t know what to say about this otherwise. It’s also difficult to hear anything.
“You was oppressin’ the German, you was oppressin’ him!”
I think the guy in glasses got a very hard reality check there about the unity of diversity.
You know he’d want the black man arrested if he could. That way he’d win the argument, in his mind.

“I’ve seen it! I’ve seen it!” I doubt he saw that Holocaust documentary by the Jewish guy who interviewed the Auschwitz people that admitted, on camera, the ‘chambers’ were built after the war.

You could point to a common kitchen knife and claim Jack the Ripper used it, doesn’t make it so. Burden of Proof.

This type of thing is often what happens when factions of identikit Leftism meet.
One party shouts, the other cries, then they swap. Like a hissy fit from adults.

They’re trying to outsignal and rentseek so I think the black guy wins.

Who is the victim here?

Check today’s Prog-Stack.

“Women used to be ladies”

The latest meme making an irritating entrance into popular thought.

TLDR; read bolded.

It’s intended to insult clubbing culture (fine, ban clubs, otherwise, STFU about them).

Like most memes appealing to history, it’s misled at best, misleading at worst.

Rewind to the earliest times with video.
Ladies have fun too. Anything less is an overhanging lie from the Sexual Revolution.

“Yes but women used to be demure and coy, they didn’t dress and act like sluts.”

It is ironic the modern man has such a lax definition, as if looking at a man ‘the wrong way’ is slutty.

Women have always ‘made eyes’ at men, because we have eyes. When we use them, we’re accused of making eyes because studies show men are acutely sensitive to social overtures from women.


Maybe, just maybe, the nature of people doesn’t change much over time, and not everything is about you and how hard done-by you are? The term for that is a victim complex.
Look up the Evelyn Nesbit scandal, it was their OJ.
They even had versions of the Kardashians, pin-up girls before pin-ups, which really date back to the 18th century and painted adverts. If you believe any advert, it’s a de-facto IQ test and you lost.


Maybe read some social history before acting like you understand all women?

Especially those in other time periods.

^If that were true, you’d be a billionaire selling us bullshit. Advertising people understand people.

Funnily enough, women tend to be up on social history, so I find a meme that relies on our collective ignorance of it rather entertaining. The average woman knows as much social history trivia as a man knows military.

In perfect truth, such males want to castigate degeneracy without drawing attention to their own.

Let alone limiting it. R-types playing K.

This is intellectually dishonest, an argument based on bad rhetoric, bad faith, historical ignorance and makes for a coward. If you’re irritated that, in a world where sex is freer than ever, you still cannot get laid, perhaps the problem is not the people you fail to impress?

Maybe the problem is that you keep bitching like a gay guy.

Don’t look at a pretty woman and think the modern version of ‘ANKLE?!!!!‘ only to wonder why you’re labelled a creep and become a social leper. Offended people on this stuff are dull from birth.

Look and think ‘that’s nice’ and move on with your day because this superficial shit is not, by definition, important.

The women least likely to wear a miniskirt are prostitutes, because the goods are not given away for free.

Everything you know is wrong.

Ask a man with sisters if he judges their sexual desperation on what they wear.

Imagine if we applied the same judgementalism to men – all short-sleeve shirts are hereby signs of a gigolo. Shorts? Whore! Wear trousers like a proper man!

Only in the 20th century did it suddenly become acceptable (imho, no) for an adult man to wear shorts. It was considered ridiculous and you’d be mocked for it like turning up to a funeral in assless chaps, as was going topless until coal-miners striked because of job demands. This is the God’s honest truth. Look it all up. Shorts are literally the most immodest thing a man can wear, the male mini-skirt. It’s worse than a mini-skirt because things can play peek-a-boo. Short sleeves come in a close second and were taken up by the Italians with the sleeveless ‘wife-beater’ where they both should have been left, men couldn’t show their waistcoat at the beginning of the 20th Century.

Casual or modest, pick ONE.

I heard this meme from Clarey on YT years ago – he immediately began to criticize every modest fashion going, with an emphasis of vitriol for the maxi skirt. …That’s just a skirt. It’s a term for a proper skirt.

This stuck in my mind because I assumed it was a joke and waited for the punchline, the hypocrisy was so overt to a non-American. You have no idea what you want, but you know how much you want it!

He hated totally normal skirt lengths, pictured in the Edwardian videos, because it covered women up and he couldn’t ogle them, no more than five seconds after saying, to paraphrase- Why don’t women dress like ladies anymore?

The problem is male demand.

Male demand for risque fashions. Rappers are the main problem.

You can see how years of this from Kindergarten can make for avoidance of anyone who tries to pull it.

You can’t countersignal if nobody values your opinion to begin with. Look through the photos of the men saying these things and you’ll quickly realize they attract casual women because they are casual men. I haven’t seen a single one that owns a single (ONE) good suit. A good suit, by style standards and formality rules. Not a great suit, not an impressive suit, not an elegant suit, not a gentleman’s suit. A single decent item.

Which brings me to my next point: how do you intend to pay for that?

More fabric, more $$$$$. That is not a typo. A suitable wardrobe is 4-figures, a good one is five. This is based on wear and variety for activities. Being formal is more expensive, rappers lie.

Look at the guys making these claims about ladies. Are they gents?

Any woman looking at these guys will immediately notice the discrepancy, it’s like…

Which fork, Forney?

They have no clue of basic etiquette and try to prattle on like a stage mother.
They are alcoholics who couldn’t tell you the difference between a white wine and red wine goblet if their lives depended on it.

Nobody takes this ‘advice’ seriously. They have nothing to offer but opinion and personal complaint.

The funniest thing my society friends ever heard about women’s fashion was one drab man telling, loudly, anyone who would listen, that spaghetti straps were the sign of a slut.

This story still does the rounds and I’ve heard people quoting it without getting the joke.
Guess the nationality. Go on, guess. I think we all know.
Guess what he was wearing with his bad tan and fake Rolex he kept showing to people who could tell the difference.

These are the guys who refuse to buy a drink to assert interest (formal politeness) or buy a dinner they invited their intended to (the formal rule) but they want a woman with expensive taste?

Are you quite sure?

They slob around in t-shirts and shorts, in general, and wonder why the women draped in £3,000 Dolce don’t give them a second look. Class does come into it. The problem is, they have none.

Therefore, they refuse to see it as an issue…. because it IS the issue.

Women do not qualify to men. Eggs are expensive.

However, not looking like ‘Kevin the teenager’ helps.

Would you show up for a job interview wearing this? Are you using it for a sport? If the answer to both is NO, do NOT wear it out of the house and for the love of Christ get a good suit before you start spouting off on Patriarchy and the dire need of male leadership.

You don’t care how you look? Yes, it shows.

Hate sluttiness? Push to ban all contraception and sexual health clinics. Yes, all.

Hate immodest clothing? Push for Elizabethan clothing laws. Yes, in social history, there are many, many actual, literal laws that restricted things like length for modesty, and most women are aware of these. It would also mean strippers are illegal and you can’t pretend to be rich in clubs without actually being rich.

I don’t expect these guys to grow the balls, ..do you?

Conformity is a feminine virtue, as I mentioned earlier, so don’t blame all women for the actions or obscenity of singular examples, otherwise, all men are like Jack the Ripper; non sequiturs about men would be far more insulting.

Why aren’t women virtuous, they ask, not a virgin themselves.

Because none of the previous words will get through to ‘these’ people.

We mock idiots like you.