Abuse, rage and SJWs

Minor points. I saw a woman having a particular problem and this is an expanded version of what I told her.
Rage is a choice to hurt others because one’s feelings are hurt in a perceived slight. There is no such thing as ‘out of control’, you are not possessed. We may feel an urge to jump off a cliff, but it’s just an urge.

SJWs are not offended, they are outraged. Narcissistic rage, to be precise. If Trigglypuff were a 300-pound MMA fighter, would her tantrums be harmless? Funny? This is not funny, whoever exhibits this behaviour. It is very serious. Even children are capable of crime up to murder. This should be mocked but not tolerated and never considered harmless. It’s antisocial behaviour. It’s verbal abuse and all sorts of other related things, including intimidation, an attempt to control by threats (in this case, to lose their rag).

It is entirely conscious, and in fact, planned.
They plan to do these things, and hence, when thwarted, seek revenge.
Common sense: You don’t seek revenge for accidents.

First stop: gaslighting the victim into thinking they’re abusive for reacting with boundaries. Called playing victim. It’s a version of playing dumb. It’s a bluff in poker terms. Turns into a game of Who Started It, as if that justifies any form of abusive behaviour (no, never). They are children emotionally. Do not pity them, do not help them. In fact, it’s healthier to punish them but by omission, cutting them out. Get the police involved, narcissists despise authority. Cut off supply, get justice the honest way afterward. Stop them victimizing others but do not gossip. Best done by law enforcement. This isn’t school, you need to snitch.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/traversing-the-inner-terrain/201205/is-rage-choice

The violent toward those they claim to love cannot express love. They may not even feel it (psychopaths). They can feel relief from control over something external to compensate for their weakness, the power dynamic they ‘confuse’ for love, and also call their inner issues a matter of external cause (e.g. you made me hit you for misbehaving, as if they’re your parent instead of an equal). Rage is a red flag to do something. Before civilization, this meant killing the threat. We are not like other animals. We all have control, this cannot be denied. If you are an adult and have the privileges, like driving and voting, you have duties too. There is no excuse for abuse.

If they deny their agency with excuses, they belong in an asylum because obviously, they cannot take care of themselves and present a danger to themselves and others. 

Repeated provocations are common so they have a legal defense. Report these people for provocation and watch them run for the hills. I’ll bet there’s a long list of people with similar complaints, seek them out and file together.

Don’t play parent, you are not responsible for such people. They are adults. They need to stop leaning on other people and check themselves into some therapy. If they refuse therapy, it’s just another ploy to keep control.

There is no such thing as Magically Disappearing Agency. It doesn’t fluctuate, it’s there or not. Either you are responsible for ALL of what you do, or you should be in State Custody, in therapy or prison.

I thought I’d post this quick one before I go.

Video: Ideological Motives in politics

Ok, I’ll bite.

K-types.

Conservatives don’t have a clear and positive goal, it’s all negative backpedaling on the defensive to no particular year, fearful avoidance and gritting the slippery slope (the Left denies exists except when they call it a ‘social trend’, sure, a fallacy…). Tradition is the bundle of behaviours that lead to a prosperous society, history is a good lesson and they’re classics to be tweaked according to utility. The concept of social harm, especially to the nuclear family, the most effective model of economic productivity of all time and totally natural, and the ripple effect of social damage throughout society in a costly way that must be picked up by the other, the taxpayer, to accommodate the reckless lifestyles they didn’t enjoy let alone choose (bailouts is the word). With true freedom of association and allowance of isolation (inc financial) from these adults, nobody would care, conservatives prize self-reliance and work ethic to the point of early cardiac death. Children need to be protected, more important as the future than adults, but the Left sees this as keeping them ignorant, instead of innocent. Conservatives think children will naturally ask questions when the time is right and forcing children to mature too early is abusive, psychologically distressing and overwhelming them with concerns they cannot mentally process (especially abusive if it’s someone else’s children). Equality of opportunity and hierarchy based on meritocracy. Don’t use logic correctly some of the time (e.g. weak analogy, everyone does this but conservatives are called stupid for being religious, using more logic would counter this) or rhetoric when required (let me counter your soundbite with percentages). Human nature is animal and law must work around this to protect us from the worst excesses of ourselves for the good of society. Low time preference pragmatism. Protecting the individual and their natural rights scales up to society, everyone has the same moral standard. People are different but we all have a role. Physical purity. Suffering makes you stronger. Everything is about the principle.

r-types.

Liberals love globalism aka supranationalism but claim to hate capitalism while using it to screw over the little guy for power (e.g. look at what happened to black communities) and promise if you vote them in again, they might undo it. Social engineering because we know everything and better than nature arrogance. Public sector is magically more honest than private and Governments solve problems instead of causing them. Leftists want to ban things like conservatives because they know better, Maternalism, a very insidious form of gaslighting where they question your ability to make decisions if you make the ‘wrong’ one (conservatives think, hey, as long as they’re your individual consequences, whatever I don’t care). Equality of outcome and double standards based on historical grievances we’re never allowed to let go covering for innate differences. Nobody can fail, nobody can succeed (or they must have cheated because we all have the same potential) because without enforced parity there is envy and anger by the Have-Nots, regardless of cause. No solutions, but rentseeking and pointscoring. Human nature is good and we deserve luxury and enjoy pleasure without social harm, no such thing as sin because naturalistic fallacy. Ignorance of outcomes of indulgence or minimizing damage to maintain image. Protecting designated special groups (of voters) from the other groups (positive discrimination) makes society better (for the politicians playing Divide and Conquer). Hedonism in children is to be encouraged in the developing brain because childhood must be enjoyable, high time preference idealism. Emotion as reason. Bad people can be reformed so the good of society involves helping the bad and blaming the good, because nobody is bad without a reason, right? Who’s the real victim? It must be someone else’s fault, we’re all responsible for one another. Emotional catharsis (purged purity). Everything is about the popularity
Libertarians, r-types who can do math, are young bachelors. It’s the ideology for the island. They want to be and stay atomised. They want nobody to limit them, in quite a selfish way because they expect certain structural supports to back them up if their ‘liberty’ efforts fail (support network built by others). They still expect a pension despite paying in insufficient taxes, for example. There is rampant entitlement because they don’t get that small Government does very little, in fact. Moral purity (I owe no one anything nor they me). Everything is about money.

SJWs want us to be equal in misery and poverty down the lowest common denominator, death to the West. They feel guilty for existing (see TC article New Church Ladies) and wish to spread the cultish notion of Original Sin via biased social contracts that promise nothing and expect everything. Invasion of heathen spaces isn’t entryism, it’s bringing the security of the faith to others, if they know what’s good for them (or else we’ll kill them, all but literally atm). Invisible unfalsifiable systems are keeping them down, conspiracy theories always without Jews for some reason, and the Devil is everywhere. Witch hunts (monstering mobs) are acceptable because we can’t expect to live and feel safe in our ideological purity around Those People, but don’t you dare exclude that man from the girl’s bathroom! The adult has more rights than the children. This is totally different from coloured fountains apparently. Proof of harm must be fake/exaggerated/all your fault (gaslighting). No rich people, no happiness privilege because sadness and self-pity still exists. Anti-majority and anti-democratic. Emotion above fact, fact as relative, narrative above pragmatism, rights without responsibility (infantile). Government as parent. Virtue signalling to be popular when they have nothing but words to offer and claim victimhood rewards like a Mary Sue, suffering makes one special and weaker (even criminals lose agency magically in a stunning display of learned helplessness). Spiritual purity (I am a good person) confirmation bias and cognitive dissonance. Everything is about me, in every way.
Avoiding personal discomfort but making out it’s for the benefit of others (dishonest collectivism). Experience (being alive) as expertise (over whom?) mentioned for attention. Degeneracy is living life to the full and leaving a beautiful corpse levels of solipsism.
Reading into everything to find something objectionable, they aren’t offended, they are outraged. Offended people shut the hell up and usually remove themselves from the situation, outraged people become loud and involved. There are good reasons to be outraged e.g. reasonable expectations, but they almost never have those or expect telepathy.

Slightly OT:

The worst faith is bad faith.
Patreon is Communist. Try to deny it. Market demands….begging….celebritized opinions as intellectual labour…
The funniest fucking thing is watching a libertarian ***strong independent*** male beg for ‘donations’ like Patreon. Are you a corporate person? Are you a charity case? Oh, but bitch about self-proclaimed victims, yeah…
Victims require criminals, one agency suppressing another. No criminal? No crime, no victim.

Note: Youtube makes more off your labour than you, but they don’t own means of production. WTF are you all doing. Band together. Start your own site, with the same damn channels. Like the Communists who say being a CEO is easy and you get rich, why not become a CEO then? A good one?
If you can’t make a living off it, it isn’t a job, it’s a hobby.

#mic drop#

Totally OT and unladylike, you’ll see why:

As a matter of fact, I’ve seen one or two Youtubers (not T, he’s great and has no idea who I am), actually rip off my topics and worse, opinions for paid videos of theirs. No credit. Intellectually dishonest compulsive masturbators. Yeah, I know it’s you, bitches and I know you’re reading this. I know you’ll rip off this post at some point too, it’s bait. Full of juicy material, isn’t it? My opinions are uniquely informed and too damn obscure so don’t even pretend you just happened to come to the exact same conclusion within one or two weeks minimum of my posting, for plausible deniability. The first time it was a coincidence. This is like, the fiftieth fucking time. Credit me you cuckadoodledoo motherfuckers.

Download a brain and think for yourselves. Topics maybe OK, as for opinions, get your own! Your Patreon supporters are paying for it! Or maybe download some principles, you rabbity fuckwits.

omg really wtf go away no audrey

They call themselves philosophers, dear readers. You might know from that alone who it is. (Clue: not Molly, a real philospher and intellectually honest for the most part).
You goys are the ‘degenerate’ capitalist ‘whores’ you complain about. Smug smirking little shits are exposed eventually and nobody is going to bail your untalented asses out.

podcastslol

Male intelligence supremacists beaten by a girl. #irony

Link: Bring back dueling, quit whining

http://thefederalist.com/2016/02/19/bring-back-dueling/

Words are only as meaningful as the actions to back them up.

If you compare someone to Hitler on Twitter, and you say you’d go back in time to kill Hitler (presumably before he did the job himself), how are you going to act on that?

This would silence the SJWs over night.

This would silence all the cowards who social signal (including some supposed redpills) in lieu of doing something. Who finger point and blame game. “It’s your fault my life sucks, I’m a victim, but you can’t hit me because… I’m a victim!” If they want to be a victim, I am happy to provide that service. They forget the true meaning of the word.

If you had to defend and guard honour like that, imagine how quickly the r-types would skedaddle.

After all, isn’t the very concept of being ‘offended’ and indeed, ‘offensive‘, directly tied to honour culture? If you choose to be offensive, you choose to defend that speech offensively.

How would your reputation look, based on your lexicon of actions?

It would be nice to see social signalling return to positive values, as was the case for the majority of history. Etiquette is a series of everyday social signals, after all. I think we all miss those small signs of regard.

Video: Europe (Whites) finally learning to say No after Cologne

Cologne seems to be the flashpoint for the EU’s naive populace that the MSM has been lying to them.

The screeching is palpable. What do you mean, we don’t have a right to use your land and its resources (women)?

Left: This isn’t supposed to happen??? We brainwashed them from birth! Racist! Wait, it isn’t working! Bigot! No, not that one either! Nazi! Nazi! Nazi! Oh phew, that still works. It’s OK guys we’re still subverting and destroying Western Civ! Good talk! Jazz hands!

Someone really needs to tell Stefan about Magic Dirt.

It’s based on the Sociologist’s Fallacy that crossing a border will induce magical whole body changes and drag a Third Worlder into the Very Model of a First World NW Europe Gentleman, genetics and all.

Wait until rations come in, won’t that be fun? Grow a Victory garden against who?

This German man needs to grow some balls. He is practically begging Stefan to give him permission to act. Many Europeans are in this tricky halfway position. They’re gathering information, unsure how to act on it.

Waiting for something.

Moving too early is as bad as moving too late.

My advice? Plan for your loved ones. That is it, you owe nothing to the people who betrayed you. Be brutal in who you include, who would die for you? Emergency fund, urgency plans if you need to flee. For the present, I’d normally say remain there, but with the new ‘shelter’ opening up, you might be targeted for your baby. However, you need that support network and so does baby. There is no exit, nowhere to escape. Move as one or fortify. Prepare.

You see little rebellions. First they say No to one sex tourist treating the cream of Europe like a brothel. And the dominoes fall. Point and shriek enough times and you’ll eventually land on a real threat.

“The Left has no facts. The Left has only verbal abuse.”

The Left has been hemorrhaging devotees as the EU blimp has trundled along, making curious noises. Nobody wants to be stuck at the end with the losers. Simply look at the consequences, they cannot be avoided any longer. There is no time.

“The Left have nothing, they can’t have reality, brain size, IQ,  biology, cultural history, inbreeding, genetics, and religious intolerance, theocracy, no separation of Church and State like all of the things that are gonna come in that are problematic.” Game recognized.

They’re hoping the Right dies fighting these guys while they are cowering playing Damsel and hide. “Let’s you and him fight.” Why, the Right ask? Why do I need to fight if I just stop him coming over here to my land?
They are manufacturing a Civil War because an Inter-European War has been a null option since all the brainwashing on WW2. They’ll come up with excuses to sit out, probably a new form of mental illness you can’t falsify. Once the currency goes kaput (sorry), these pampered little hipsters in their gated communities will need the protection of a scapegoat. Who better than literal rape culturalists?
These refugees may be the foot soldiers, but people are fingering the leaders, and they don’t like that.
Why should we fight for you, the Right ask?

They have no answer. Mumbling about we’re all human, we all bleed red.
Fine, the Right say, you go do it. Who is ‘we’, paleface? Where were you? Who are you, to order me? We are not kin. We are not ingroup. You said patriotism is evil, so you won’t desire its protections, right? “Rough men stand ready to do violence… for their own. They aren’t playing pawn to be moved around by propaganda anymore and it’s beautiful.
They wanted division based on politics, they got it. Loud and clear, signal received. In Europe, the elite have nothing to do with this, they’ll be fine. Always, they’ll pay their way into safety. This isn’t an issue about the rich. If you look at the UK media, it is overwhelmingly middle class. Who do they get a hate-on for? Marx’s pets, the poor.

http://www.theweek.co.uk/politics/20733/how-media-became-painfully-middle-class
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jul/01/tv-industry-middle-class-endemol-shine-tim-hincks-diversity
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/roifield-brown/uk-media_b_4733905.html

This is a class war, and the native poor are seeing it.
One factor they have in their favour: voting bloc.
Why else would the right wing be winning recently, if not for that crucial bastion of support, traditionally belonging to the Left? But the Left sold them out. They favoured the Outgroup. Oh this poor (outgroup), anyone but the evil white men! 
Those natural conservatives (who prize country and family above all else) are finally leaving the abusive relationship and voting with their feet. To the left, this is unprecedented. An end of Left/Right they call it, because people are’t fitting into their neat little boxes anymore (vote based on class). Oh, L/R exist still, but their definitions are outdated. That’s what you get for living in an Ivory Tower instead of the Real World. The left’s response, at our last election?

How dare these poor people be so selfish.

Seriously, that was the best they could come up with. The mind boggles.

Who made these people poor? They’re looking into it now. This was the first election the media tried to rig by controlling the information flow – and failed. Almost a year later, they have nothing, they refuse to admit trashing the economy (like Brown selling off all our gold for pittance) or screwing over the workers for foreign labour with immigration, despite unemployment/underemployment. Like SJWs (their leadership since Blair), they’ve doubled down. Did we vote in the immigrant Jewish rich bloke who never worked a real job in his life? No.

We’d rather have the posh, rich closeted gay pig-fucker. Dwell on this. It’s the Principle.
Look at the suffrage post and who voted in the Left for a long period (men) and this becomes apparent. The poor, white men are on strike from social justice warriors. Their wives too and this female vote finally turning up to the polls, angry enough, was the crucial deciding point (the ‘Mum vote’) in landing it for the Tories.

Did you see the pink Labour van? It was like Monty Python. The conversations over the kitchen table? Wow.

This is a trend. We are at Stop. Wait……

It carries on….

No. Not now. Never. Never again. I’m gonna give you to the count of three to get off my land before we rearrange your face into a Picasso. The police have been called and your trial date confirmed. The State will escort you to The Wall now. Secret Police: We’ll deport you to Hell personally. Who needs that much paperwork?

Watching it in real-time is like;

I guess we need to accept this has happened and it's going to get pushier

Knowing it’s going to get worse with the economy. But since I am white and belong here, also like;

Our elders are criticizing us because we see past their BS.

It’s a strange two-minds situation.
You want to limit damage but you wonder if that would just prolong the problem.
There is a beauty in the justice of sitting back and watching the Left’s high time preference destroy their ideology. They won’t get back in once this is over.

Video: The injustice of forced redistribution

I can’t recall who said it (probably Uncabob?) but there is a sexual marketplace advocacy for this (rape) among supposed redpills despite how they also maintain that men don’t need women (sure) and he/someone dubbed it Affirmative Action for omega males.

That’s what all this is.

The entitlement of ‘positive discrimination’ based on victimhood claims. 

Ok, let’s assume the world is against you since your very birth. In every way.

-So fucking what? We don’t owe you anything.

Do you owe ugly girls anything? No.

If all the women stayed at home in the kitchen, who would the manwhores sleep with? If all the women became state prostitutes like the Nazi brothels, who would they have children with? They don’t even know what they want or what’s good for them, it’s such r-selected delusion we can’t help but laugh.

That’s why the manosphere will fail in changing the morality scales (men are already at an advantage in the SMP historically), victim status is like a game of dodgeball with razorblades and your opponents are self-harming emo kids. Add to that the practicality, that whining about your suffering makes it worse (rumination) and further lowers your social status (if you can’t fix your own life, why should we listen to you?) Measuring your life by the metric of notches is juvenile too. Like people are baseball cards. I bet the same guys calling for ‘free pussy’, in effect, also don’t want to pay for the consequences via tax. In fact, I’d bet they all minimize their tax contributions, illegally.

Think about it – cavemen had one woman. They were happy. It has nothing to do with masculinity. It’s a marketing gimmick to get you to prove something with signalling.

Footnote: It’s a little-known fact, but every British person can do a Victorian accent, sometimes a few. We practice them at school reading Great Expectations etc. aloud. I’m secretly hoping it comes back into fashion.

Link: Forgiveness isn’t sainthood

http://lonerwolf.com/forgiveness-sainthood/

As a one-off? Probably healthy. Little things like forgetting your birthday or breaking a vase.

As a habit?

Something’s wrong, and it might be the person ‘forgiving’. In cases of learned helplessness, they always try to portray themselves as perfect and forgiving. In fact, they enable bad behaviours, encourage evil people by being a doormat and get off on being the victim.

It’s an excuse to indulge repeatedly in grossly destructive behaviour by denying personal agency and forgiving the Evil figure who caused it. The opposite of saintly (scapegoating). And trying to claim status points by signalling afterward? Worse than the person they’re supposedly forgiving, they play everyone.

You should forgive something if it is entirely in the past and doesn’t matter at all anymore.

Otherwise, it’s foolish, because the conditions aren’t finished yet.

Why I think the MRA/Angry MGTOW bitches will ultimately fail

Spectacularly. 

dis gonna be good anticipation pull up a chair listen watch

I’ve been asked this and it’s a fair question, this’ll be the one time I address the topic so I can leave it alone. To fail. On its own. Some joke about the entropy of sexual frustration.

What unites the two groups?

Condition 1:

“society is unfair!”

hmm uhuh o rlly really ah sure thing

Life is unfair but go on.
Condition 2.  As I put it earlier:

wah wah wah Matriarchy is keeping me down”

don draper crying baby wah wah wah

Passive and unmanly but I’ll roll with that as premise.
The writing will be clunky, probably.

Why does modern society hate men?
Men fight the Government.

Think on that for a bit and come back.

Men don’t ask for things like women. Men overthrow, men topple, men destroy and war. They don’t need you for war anymore. What do they need you for, that they can’t get elsewhere?
If you are not willing to do those things, give your life to a cause, you are not a man and what you are defending is a luxury of the First World rather than a right. If you can live without it, it isn’t a right.
This is the point where they get anecdotal and apply injustice/victim mentality to areas of life that do not and will never apply to them e.g. the old canard, marriage is evil but I’m never getting married or women are dumb bitches I don’t need them why don’t they like me or my personal favourite I don’t need children where is my pension. 

Quick test: do they read the Victim Bible called The Guardian? If so, Pass Go and fuck yourself.

Let’s take the feminist metaphor that they want to use, to make the Government fuck men over further, but these guys keep agreeing with for suicidally stupid reasons: the Gender War. Let’s buy into their frame further.
Life isn’t a movie, it doesn’t matter which side is ‘right’, it is made by who has the biggest bastard on their team.
In this case, the Government. Who literally hold all the cards, and write all the laws, and hold all the guns (UK edition).

My sentiment on the tide against PC.

So what are you gonna do?
What can you do?
Sweet FA.

Government will crush the bitchy MGTOW and MRA agenda.
The equality paradigm (that isn’t fair! that’s discrimination bc I’m a man!) requires victims. The physically stronger sex cannot take a dive and fake an injury, this isn’t football. It doesn’t work. It will never work, whining delta, gamma and omega males cannot speak for their stronger counterparts, as feminists cannot speak for normal women. It’s called History. History is the proof men are not the weaker sex. Yet they keep going. At this point it’s embarrassing.

This isn’t all good for women and many women do not support the actions of Government, as many men don’t either (one of the issues with democracy, check out neoreaction some time folks).

The women who do (feminists) make a grievous error.
Women think Government will protect them. When things happen, SHTF, which do they need?
The sociopathic pen-pushers or men, in the street?
Yet they stab their guardians in the back and with crimson hands say “what happened?”. You became a concubine for the system. You are the whore for Babylon. That’s what happened. No wonder the men are doubtful. Distrustful. Some are just as bad though, and deserve no moral high horse, they deserve an ass. They don’t object to female parasitism, as long as they get a good, long suck off the State teat too. So it isn’t about sex. Sex doesn’t divide us. It’s about politics, it’s r/K. The fake MGTOW are the r-selected and want the world to improve around them, the real are K and want to improve themselves.
They want all the goodies too, to be ‘equal’ with feminists, with none of the responsibility too. Like feminists. They want a wife, all the cooking, sex, affection, kids but with none of the obligation, so they get a free hooker and call her a girlfriend. The girlfriend isn’t really giving it up for free, but he keeps up the pretense that it might get serious. To keep her, he must deceive her. He is the male equivalent of the feminist monster, who marries you to divorce you.

For the free hooker label;

What’s the point of a hooker? You enjoy their company. You leave when that stops.
What’s the point of a bf/gf, again?…

It used to be husband/wife auditions, there was a set timing to it, for courting. Now it’s a way for a man to claim a woman, like he owns her legally (wife), use up the best years of her life (youth) and ward other men off…. without commitment. Without any responsibility on his side.
And they complain about the societal decay, the fallout from this. Sure, there are many women on welfare, but how many of the fathers wanted to marry the mother of their children and financially support them? Are we all adults here? Do men deserve some moral exemption from a problem caused by two?
And you hear all these stories like “my gf cheated on me boo hoo” and it’s like, there’s no such thing. There are two relationship statuses: single or married. This is why men ‘cheat’ on their gf. They know this. What is the duty of a bf/gf? What? The idea is almost laughable.
There is no commitment that is not codified in law. She owed you nothing because you gave her nothing.

Counterexample: Same way a gf isn’t entitled to a proposal after X years. Or your money.

And which sex allowed it to become this way? Which sex allowed Patriarchy to decay and crumble?
Men. Men have only other men to blame.

Most of it, is that they wanted free sex. The primary motivation for men. Except nothing in life is free. So they had to give women excess power in exchange. If men wanted to reinstall a Patriarchy, all they would need to do is swear off sex with women. Then what? What can they do? What can they dangle as incentive, like training a dog? We all know they’ve got nothing, as a whore’s only value is sex. The MRA/angry MGTOW group are fighting against other men, sociopathic men running the system (and still blaming women somehow, which does make them misogynists). Do you think the sociopaths of the system really care what’s fair? What do you have to offer? You don’t have a pussy to whore out. You don’t have money. The tax system already took it. You’re already screwed.

Surprise! The Sisterhood lied to you to try and steal your prospects for themselves.

But go ahead, keep bitching about it. Like a girl. It makes you look really competent and adult.

Our elders are criticizing us because we see past their BS.

The rest of us are watching you and it’s quite funny. We lost sympathy when you started being stupid.
When it collapses, you’ll blame everybody but yourselves. That’s why it will fail.