Claudia Boleyn video: “What is it like being a feminist online?”

I get forwarded these by people when she passingly mentions me. Those people are sadists because yes, I find her annoying but she’s a useful study in SJW. This time is quite momentous, don’t blame me for the post frequency it’s right of reply. She’s the more eloquent type of ditz than regular SJWs.

This is mostly direct quotes and you’ll soon see why. You can double check the video itself if you’re a masochist.

…I get misquoted a lot, I get a lot of people, …I get people sending me quotes, apparently quotes that I’ve said, which have never left my mouth or left my fingertips on my keyboard of my laptop ever in my life. Often asking me to explain my opinions on topics that I have no idea what these topics even are, I’ve never heard of these topics before, using words I don’t know the meanings of. So that’s really frustrating.

mean girls regina george that's really interesting sarcasm
Isn’t there a feminist meme? Educate yourself?

There’s a lot of misinformation floating around. …I mean I get enough shit for the things I do actually say so I don’t need the added help. …Sometimes it can be quite amusing.

That’s trolling. If you put out inflammatory content to get a negative reaction. Trolling.

…It can be amusing to see quite how many of these strange little people you are pissing off with your words and that gives me great strength to know that there are people out there that are so obsessed with me

obsessed with me mean girls regina george
~sigh~

that they’re on all my videos threatening to do these things to me. I’m clearly a big part of these people’s lives now, which is strange.

Most feminists limit themselves to the character limit of Twitter, this one is an odd specimen. The format change incurs a difference in response.

…That does make me laugh, so if you’re watching this video to those particular trolls… I hope that one day you manage to break yourself from the cycle of watching my videos if you hate me so much and you are able to resist the urge to send me misogynistic slurs and hate speech.

Your sub count would drop like a rock.

Personally, I find her videos comical. I pour myself a stiff drink. She’s confusing the people who actually threaten her (such as the rape thing, which is inexcusable) with every passive viewer (no direct contact) who disagrees.

…People compliment my eyebrows a lot.

Those people are not your friends. This mean girl behaviour is exactly what they are doing because it reduces your attractiveness as competition (or they have awful taste);

I was going to say something before because it’s so bad but it would’ve sounded mean, now you mentioned: Brow powder and gel to set is your friend, be subtle, it shouldn’t look like you drew them on with marker. While we’re at it, texturizing hair mousse combed through, stop applying blush on your cheekbones (not apples) and spring for highlighter liquid and contour powder and you need a sheer foundation applied by damp sponge because that one is too heavy. Lipstick choice is acceptable if too pink for your rose-toned skin but clearly applied from the bullet, buy a brush for shaping and layering. This is how you can tell I’m female although at one point she insinuates everyone in disagreement is “anti-feminist male.”
Resources, let me help you PLEASE:
http://www.therulesrevisited.com/2012/05/how-to-avoid-looking-fake.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/22/beauty-mistakes-scouse-brows_n_4642703.html

…I get asked for a lot of advice by people and this is really strange for me and it’s quite difficult for me because I really want to be able to help people and advise them but I’m no authority on anything… I’m really not the sort of person that people should look up to really, I don’t think, anyway, because I’ve mucked up so many times in my past…

That one single point is the entire reason, the ENTIRE purpose, of writing my initial post on you. To protect other people, vulnerable people and children/teens who might follow it without question. Since then it’s just been replying.

And I’ve had people saying that I’m pretending to be queer online,

Pretending? No. You aren’t straight. You’re definitely something else, I was quibbling over definitions of which terms were appropriate and citing Berkeley. I love how you were heteronormatively biased in assuming I’m normal myself. Identity politics leaves a bad taste, I take things on merit.
Misrepresenting yourself on a variety of different mediums, with proof written by you? Yeah. People are starting to notice when you say contradictory things. We are capable of critical thinking.

I’m pretending to be bisexual, that I’m pretending to be, um, pretending to be half-Indian.

I never said the Indian thing. Must be somebody else. It’s obvious she’s telling the truth there.

… And some of them can get quite obsessive which is quite worrying, because you know, like I said before about people that comment on my videos, these people actually go back through my videos I’ve made in the past when I was younger and stuff

You have a channel. The medium is intended for that specific purpose. Why do you make them and keep them up if they have an expiration date? At least you haven’t ragequit though.

and hunt me down online, like hunt down my various profiles online and try to get stuff on me which is really scary and I think it’s harassment really, it’s like online stalking and I think that’s very disgusting,

Wait, wait, hold up. You put the information up there. You wrote it. You put it there. Stalking involves invasion of privacy. There is no such thing as stalking information a person has chosen to share publicly to garner attention and public discussion on, it’s right to publicity we are helping you exercise, that ‘evil’ action would be called reading/watching. Reading self-uploaded content online isn’t stalking. Harassment? How? Where do you get this stuff? If you quit mentioning me, I’d quit replying to you. Happily. I’m kinda bored of you by now. I refuse to review anything to do with the mess of modern Who.

so I’m very wary of that and I’ve actually had the police involved.

WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK.
Is she trying to get on TV, is that it?
Does she know wasting police time is a crime?

I’m not gonna talk about that too much here

because it would make you look bad, can’t have that
they dropped it too, didn’t they
that’s also why
why did they?
hmmm?

but I have had the police involved with something like that before so yeah, I’m not afraid to report that kind of thing by the way.

she is very trigger happy with power, huh? Has anything actually happened IRL? Doubtful. Online stuff you block or avoid. It’s simple. And what about counter-suits? Have you considered that? Is your casefile that strong, to drag anonymous people (with a stronger right to privacy as non-Youtubers) out and withstand a libel suit for twisting their words or actions? Malicious prosecution suits? Again, I doubt it. Maybe try studying law, a topic you don’t understand, before running off to the police because someone disagreed with you beyond a ‘safe space’ echo chamber. There is no right to be exempt from disagreement, intellectual debate or offense. You cannot censor all criticism of your ideas which are not positive and completely yielding.
As I put it in another post: If you wish to discuss controversial subjects, you will attract controversy.

Just in case you are one of those stalker kind of people, you know, I will just go straight to the police so you know.

Sounds like a threat.
And accusing people of crimes they haven’t committed is slander. As I keep repeating, you are not qualified to decide certain things. Whether a person is a criminal is a judge’s job.
Would you go to the papers about it too? Cash in on an interview? That would be the ultimate test of whether you suffered any ill feeling. You see, if a person is truly stalked (I have been, I speak from experience), the last thing they would do is draw attention to themselves (police guidelines too) and give interviews about it (attentionseeking).

……Misandry’s like a joke that feminists have picked up on just to frighten MRAs and men that are particularly oppressive and full of bullshit.

It isn’t just white men, it’s all men, and it stretches back over a century.
You should know this. That is the history of the movement you support.

..They don’t seem to have the imagination to see outside of that so when they hear about feminism they don’t bother to listen to what we’re saying about society.

Maybe we like data and logic? > emotion, imagination

…They’re not actually misandrists, they just say it to scare those particular men and it is quite amusing. Also women don’t actually have the power for their hate to do damage.

This explains so much about how you operate.

(example of how there is no such thing as racism against white people)

Diverse of you. Inclusive. Tolerant.

Obviously I don’t hate men. If I did hate men, I don’t think it would be that much of a big deal really, to be honest …. I see a lot of male feminists, allies, I don’t know if they should be called feminists or not, that’s a debate…

There’s nothing else of value except for her elevator pitch to become a feminist like her.
The lack of agreement between women should actually be a good thing.

Video: The origins of political correctness

http://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/2occ7m/wikipedias_cultural_marxism_article_now_redirects/

Here’s the Wikipedia’s old article on Cultural Marxism:

Wikipedia – Cultural Marxism

And here is what it redirects to now:

Wikipedia – Cultural Marxism

Page 55, The Genesis of Critical Theory, from The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923-1950 by Martin Jay (1973);

In Dammerung Horkheimer wrote: “Logic is not independent of content.

There are no solutions. Only wanton destruction.

Video: UKIP’s Nigel Farage threatened on BBC Question Time by UAF’s Bunny La Roche

Why wasn’t the bitch arrested? It was broadcast to millions of people. Notice how they tried to take the microphone away so the audience at home wouldn’t sympathize with him?

If she’d have assaulted him it would have been the full scorecard of Left ‘debate’ techniques.
Interruption, shouting, -isms, threats.

UPDATE: Informed the crazy (woman?) is called Bunny la Roche. Literal name. She(?) is a member of the Socialist Worker’s Party, formerly worked for them, Unite Against Fascism (UAF) member;

bunnylarocheUAF

known affectionately as “Boiler” Bunny

she even attacks her fellow Left wingers

affiliated with the Kent International Socialists

who said;

“Heckling is a long-established democratic tradition and to equate it with violence is ludicrous.”

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/bunnylaroche

affiliated with Left Unity (unofficial group)

LinkedIn https://uk.linkedin.com/pub/bunny-la-roche/35/5b9/5b9

and a ‘Stand Up to UKIP’ campaigner.

bunnylarochethreateningnigelfarage
Is this what stares out of the abyss?

Video: Hating Hate Crime laws

Ah, but it isn’t the crimes which are already crimes, like rape or murder, although they want to make the sentencing worse, that is the judge’s decision based on the evidence, it shouldn’t be formalized. Hate laws are themselves hateful and divisive. What could be more hateful than separating sections of society by law according to those sensitive factors?
It’s hate speech they target. Really, hateful (AND non-PC) opinions. You see, opinions and free speech aren’t illegal, but they want exceptions. PC Get out of Jail free cards. There is no exception to freedom. It is fundamental. The only argument for hate speech law with any weight is the incitement of violence, except, those violent acts are already illegal, making hate speech at best a futile addition wasting police time. At worst, it undermines a basic tenet of civilized society, free thought and expression of that thought in speech.

There will always be outrageous opinions; God is outrageous to an atheist, and vice versa, but as long as people don’t commit crimes using those opinions as an excuse, they don’t matter. (Then it’s contempt of court or something similar like perjury for lying). The people who benefit from these overhauls seek to cocoon themselves into a special bubble where offense is impossible, while enjoying a carte blanche freedom themselves. Moreover, they are extremists themselves, who wish to quash intellectual opposition, however moderate, to their ideas. Debate is necessary because it is controversial. There is no debate available on settled topics. In a debate, no one is safe. This is necessary because the merit of ideas and rhetoric matter. Creating a new legal status is akin to a protected class of Caesars, and will encourage much the same resentment from everyone else who must deal with them. The Emperors have no clothes, and soon, if you tell them, they will ruin your life for it.

Video: A word to left-wing students

in the model of Stepford Students.

http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/9376232/free-speech-is-so-last-century-todays-students-want-the-right-to-be-comfortable/

Have you met the Stepford students? They’re everywhere. On campuses across the land. Sitting stony-eyed in lecture halls or surreptitiously policing beer-fuelled banter in the uni bar. They look like students, dress like students, smell like students. But their student brains have been replaced by brains bereft of critical faculties and programmed to conform. To the untrained eye, they seem like your average book-devouring, ideas-discussing, H&M-adorned youth, but anyone who’s spent more than five minutes in their company will know that these students are far more interested in shutting debate down than opening it up.

Feminist Claudia Boleyn’s new video: You can’t be sad because starving children in Africa and cancer

She came back with another gem. It’s just. wow. such wow.

I am mostly posting quotes because Claudia has really twisted herself into an SJW pseudologic pretzel and I wanna record this, most of it isn’t worth the 2 brain cells needed for a full personal commentary rebuttal.

Claudia Boleyn: The most annoying thing that people can possibly say to you when you’re depressed, mentally ill, or otherwise just upset. (title card)

Yeah. Breaking a nail is equivalent to real suffering. Everything is personal.

Is that supposed to make me feel better?

Yes, it’s called a sense of proportion and perspective. Gratitude? Humility? I’ve lost you, haven’t I?

I didn’t realize that only one person in the world was entitled to compassion and love and attention due to negative circumstances at one time. Do I have to enter myself into a competition for this title? Since when did our misery [DS: MISERY!] have to be measured against other people’s misery and come out on top in order for it to be valid?

Wow. This is super-awkward. They have literally no idea what they look like to normal people huh?

Do these people [these terrible, terrible people] have some sort of mental hierarchy in their brains where they rank everyone from one to ten on the misery scale? [Metrics are oppressive social constructs] Do they know [those complete bastards] how silly and nonsensical they sound when they say this kind of thing to people?

No. No they do not.
On a serious note, you’re supposed to be inspired by another’s success and composure. Alien concept to the hate brigade of envy.

More than one person are allowed to be in pain at one time.

Yes, until the Government passes a law against it.

There is more than enough compassion and love [and medication] in this world to go around or so I hope.

Nod and back away from the crazies

I find this argument really disrespectful to people with cancer –

wait, you don’t have cancer. Your opinion is worthless. #NotYourShield

-because they’re going through a traumatic time themselves –

in your imagination….

-and you’re just deciding to use them –

and what are you doing right now? Right this second?

-to silence other people who are also, perhaps, going through something quite traumatic in their own lives.

She was born in England so as a fellow Englishwoman may I just apologise for her completely. Every cancer survivor I know is humble and would never feel ‘disrespected’ by a metaphor that acknowledges the enormity of their suffering and its toll on their loved ones too.

She is comparing herself to people with cancer – to win sympathy. And an argument. Has anyone told her Nigel Farage had cancer? The man she said this about (click for source) –

farageclaudiacancerbeingabitchHow disrespectful is that, Claudia? What love and compassion you demonstrate. The man also survived a plane crash, watch this video-

– and continue being a bitch while pretending to support cancer survivors. Or doesn’t it count if the victim is a man because Patriarchy.

And then there’s those slightly racist undertones going on with that starving children in Africa picture.

The truth is no excuse, apparently.

I mean yes, there are starving children in Africa. That is correct.

Omg, Claudia. Slightly racist. Hey, we already knew. This same girl who also said: “I cannot think of a single instance of racism against white people. … It’s like a weird victim complex going on.”

Africa isn’t actually a country.

Nobody said it was.

Africa is a huge and diverse continent –

Wow, you have an atlas you looked at once. Africa’s a lot bigger than the old maps suggest actually.

-full of lots of different, varied types of people in various situations.

You could’ve stopped at Africa is a continent.

Africa is not

oh no

no plz

some far-off monolith-

like a whole continent?

made up of pitiful brown people that we white people-

wait, hold up, you said in other videos and media you aren’t white, you’re mixed race. You don’t get to hop the race fence whenever you feel like it. Man, such a liar. Example:

mixedraceclaudiaagainwhythelies-can use in our disaster and white saviour porn.

But you’re using them right now. If you feel bad about X, you must feel bad about Y. Emotional blackmail.

What I’m saying is that your feelings and emotions are always valid and that’s because you’re feeling them.

You haven’t studied OCD cases, have you?
Therapists, qualified people, say just because you think something or feel something, doesn’t make it valid. For example, say a kid has an intrusive thought about axe-murdering his parents. It isn’t real and he doesn’t need to treat it as valid. To quote PsychCentral; “I think it is worth mentioning here that the intrusive thoughts of those suffering from Obsessive Compulsive Disorder are often no different than the thoughts of so called “normal people.” But instead of just accepting their thoughts as “just thoughts” and letting them go, those suffering from OCD may attach too much validity to them, to the point of becoming distraught at the realization that they could even think such horrible things. This reaction can fuel the strong desire to avoid these thoughts at all costs.”
In a depressive context, validating every errant thought and feeling is one of the worst things you could do. It’s called rumination and it makes everything worse. *takes scholar beret off* Back to Claudia.

 

It doesn’t matter what triggers them off, if you’re feeling them, then they’re important.

How’s that approach working out for you, post-suicide attempt? Should you really be giving out advice when it works out terribly for you? Is that responsible?

Do not get wrapped in some person’s small-minded, ableist, patriarchal misery grading system.

Q: Who is more oppressed and miserable: a white woman, a mixed race woman, or a black woman? Are they equal or are they graded?

Silencing people –

in what context? Knowing when to keep your mouth shut is crucial to etiquette.

-and making them bottle up their feelings –

we have an NHS. You can see a therapist for the low low price of free.

-can only lead to misery –

stiff upper lip works y’know, not all of the time, but some of the time. #thistooshallpass

-and sometimes it does lead to death.

Everyone will die eventually. Life leads to death. You mean suicide. Does your belief system lead to suicide? Sure feels like it.

If more people felt comfortable talking about their feelings

#HeforShe was a bust

then less people would hit crisis point and there’d be much less suffering in the world.

Male victims outnumber female 4:1, MRA stat. Don’t mention it. Ever. You hate MRAs.

If we live in a society where people are going to be labelled as attention-seeking, selfish, manipulative or drama queens for expressing their true emotions then less and less people are gonna reach out for the help they need when they hit their breaking point.

There was no basis for that claim whatsoever. Or any of your claims, but that one in particular.
People are labelled for what they are. You can have a problem, but you can also handle it in a socially unacceptable way i.e. attention-seeking, like comparing yourself to cancer victims. *cough cough*

So ignore those emotion-policing bullies –

and we’ll continue to ignore you thought-policing bullies.

-and the next time they tell you you’re not allowed to express your sadness [around them, at that time, a request from politeness or a sense of appropriateness] because there are children starving in Africa or there are people dying of cancer [do NOT question yourself and ask whether they have a point, that would be the adult response] ask them exactly what they are doing to help said starving children [like paying taxes to foreign aid, you wouldn’t know about that, being a spoiled student most of your life] and people suffering from cancer [taxes, again, NHS funding, thank the rich] watch them mumble incoherently and get really embarrassed [bullying, you’re advocating bullying] and then cry all over them because clearly they hate the emotion [manipulative].

You have every right to feel bad sometimes [agreed] and you have every right to express that [no].

Claudia Boleyn, everybody. Using selective metaphorical cancer victims and Borderline personality manipulative bullying to win a row. Encouraging guilt-tripping others into unnecessary charity work as a lazy non-taxpayer living in rich London off family members. Here she is doing a baby impression #firstworldproblems;

claudia boleyn baby impression crying