Video: The Kali Yuga age

I love to hear about the ancient basis for Strauss-Howe but to remain published they missed out the sexual immorality and open debauchery that characterizes it. (And causes it).

The age that mocks virgins and worships the whores, a man put it to me once.

I was very young at the time so I didn’t believe it could exist, described it as Hell.

He didn’t laugh with me. Now I know it was strangely accurate, as I was forced to look at a picture of a Kardashian on the cover of a gossip magazine today while buying a drink. Virtuous people or anyone with genuine spirituality and values is considered the foolish one, because it is believed there are no standards unless inverted, no consequences for anything ever.

Any time period that judges your value based on your whorishness, male or female, is to be despised.

You are not your khakis, fine but you are not your body parts, that’s so much worse. You can buy new fucking khakis.

Pop culture isn’t popular, it pushes whores onto us as people we should admire and real people are sick of it. They have nothing to say, it’s just whorish bullshit everyday. Your penis and/or vagina work, we don’t care. We don’t care about your bowel function either. It’s the genital phase of Freud’s work, regressed and backward.

It isn’t bread and circuses, it’s shots and “Love” Island.

Perverting the word love to cover lust is another sign.
Saying sleep with instead of fuck.
Saying slut instead of whore.
Saying party animal instead of alcoholic.
Saying boyfriend/girlfriend instead of lover, even the word lover they cringe at and need to cover yet again what they do from themselves, living in sin.
Saying assault instead of rape.
Saying child predator instead of pedophile.
Lies,  damn lies.

How many “right wing people” actually attack the PC polite phrases for degenerate acts, that give them a fig leaf of respectability? Take that leaf away and society can call it out. Keep it there and it festers uncontrollably.

These are the cultural Marxist inventions of the 20th century and you’re going to allow that?

Really?

You don’t want censorship? Start there. They’ve got you censoring yourself on that bullshit.

The deceit of one’s kin (and to abandon duties) comes from the various lusts – to control, dominate, rape (as in to take) all sorts of things.

Status symbols, that’s all the spiritual life some people have, junk and vapid toys.

The pride leads to lust, leads to wrath, leads to avarice etc. etc. It’s a horrific chain.

comment

People can say all they want that now is the most peaceful time in history. But those who are not blind can see the truth. No other generation had expended as many resources in such a small amount of time. No other generation has destroyed as much nature as we have. No other generation has been as dependant as we are on the resources at hand. The world is heading towards one of the greatest catastrophes in human history.

I hate to pick up this broken record but I’m gonna play it again.

Do you realize how most sins are no longer tried as crimes? Even rape and murder can now simply not be investigated, because of who you are, that is lawlessness. Already here babe.

That’s why we live in the worst of times, worse than the endgame of Rome, they don’t even know they’re evil or when questioned about what evil does, laugh and enjoy it. That is Satanism, the essence of it. The pride, the savagery, the nihilism, the hedonism. We think this is normal, historically the modern world is a monster.

We’re trapped in a societal prison with all stripes of criminals, who are celebrated by one another, and no judge, no justice. Every dystopia is a documentary for now. Future historians will balk that we suffered so much evil to thrive.

Drunkenness, lechery, debauchery alone would put at least 2/3 citizens in prison and they’d be happy to be there. They’d claim up is down and evil is the ultimate, supreme good.

How has evil not corrupted their hearts? You can’t be paying attention and think most modern humans are good. Know a tree by its fruit. Their lives aren’t a single percent holy. They are disgusted by the idea.

Humans didn’t abide by the law, natural or divine doesn’t matter. There will be consequences and my only regret is the few good people (who are scattered everywhere) will be severely inconvenienced by them. At BEST.

Because the stupid or evil people (depending on your pill chroma) want to be “independent” now, sure.

While it’s the feast years and they can wrack up debts.

What about when anything goes wrong? Literally any-thing.

Who will the Mob of degenerates pile onto? With their pre-rehearsed “learned my lesson, it was all a mistake, now you owe me to fix this for me” routine? The rotting stench of entitlement.

That’s right….. they’ll expect a bailout on every level, a level playing field too, they’ll demand their sins be erased because they have no shame, never did. No guilt. They act like psychopaths and have the mindset to match, pure predator. Predator of fellow man. That is the part that kills me.

This cannot end well.

But an end must come.

God didn’t command child sacrifice

To pre-empt a particular lie.

https://www.str.org/blog/god-didn%E2%80%99t-command-child-sacrifice

“”When you offer your gifts, when you cause your sons to pass through the fire, you are defiling yourselves with all your idols to this day.”

The first thing to note here is that God says they defile themselves when they burn their children. God is against it and “pronounced them unclean” because of it. We also see that God first gave them statutes “by which, if a man observes them, he will live.” This is what God wanted for them—life. But they rejected those statutes, returning to idols; and attached to those idols were statutes of death, by which they defiled themselves.

defiled, precise wording

They would not have statutes of life? Then, God says, here are your idols’ statues of death.

Again, an old sense of humour.

Fine, let them have it.

God gave them over to these statutes of death so He could judge them for their evil through their own actions, showing that He is Lord and judgment awaits those who reject His life-giving commands.”

Bad choices will kill you.

Consider also

https://biblehub.com/exodus/22-18.htm

Do not suffer a witch to live.

2+2 still = 4

So who would be saved from… wrath. Let’s keep it to God’s wrath.

Incredibly few people, the happy sinners known as Satanists who choose it all again and again all have one (other) thing in common. Orgies.

Remember, they sin against their own body? And it’s unusual? That sin? Why point it out?

(every body belongs to the Lord, it is His Temple)

Among defilements, let’s go for jugular on this one.

Fornication will cause the most perdition. It was the whore of Babylon, not the banker.
I find it strange all these fornicators on the chans believe they’re so far removed from the Satanists they pretend to take down, so morally superior, when they already know about the hub of their meetings and power -“sex parties”. All fornication is Satanic, and they know this, it’s throughout the Bible and hinted that sin is energy to Satanic forces, depriving the forces of good. Well, why has Satanism been strongest since the Sexual Revolution? Revolution of what? Q better deliver a full explanation of what this Revolution actually was, it had better be in the 40%.
https://biblehub.com/exodus/22-16.htm

Laws of Social Responsibility

16 If a man seduces a virgin who is not pledged in marriage and sleeps with her, he must pay the full dowry for her to be his wife.

It also opposes fornication with a married person, with adultery proscriptions in the Ten Commandments.

So no sex unless married. Can’t really move outta that command. No wriggle room.

Not even hookers, there’s still a soul tie (how Satanism works).
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+6%3A16&version=NIV

And anyone who says men can’t be virgins is outright lying.

Clearly stated in Rev 14:4, it’s a gender-neutral term (gender being linguistic).

http://biblehub.com/revelation/14-4.htm

4 These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins.

That word again.

Coincidence, sure.

The sections on the anti-Christ are also compelling reading.

I link so you can check up on all this for yourself. Bible Hub allows you to search by keyword.

Everybody belongs to everybody else

No, BNW fans, there is no “right to reproduce” because that requires another person’s consent (and marriage license*).

Things a rapist would say.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/723323/Sexual-partner-fertility-disability-World-Health-Organisation-IVF

Your rights end where another’s begin. The entitlement is sickening.

Otherwise various tumblr fandoms, say Hiddleston’s would be entitled to rape him or at least steal his sperm. No.

And the men celebrating this (hoping to get hookers on taxpayer money**) don’t want to pay child support?

R-types, my God.

*Technically a marriage license was the old way to license reproduction. Obtaining a good match was difficult, courtship was logical!

**Relief is within your grasp….

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gods_of_the_Copybook_Headings

Subtext: if you are celibate or damn, not a slut, there’s something wrong with you.

Stop the shaming for things that are prosocial.

Video: Virgins, post-Revolution

That isn’t possible at all.
The Sexual Revolution was designed to reduce the pool of suitable wives.
And to a lesser extent, the suitable husbands (no cheating, no regret, can be satisfied sexually).
Virgin shaming, as it’s been dubbed, is the entire purpose.
This ‘defense’ against slut shaming is based on two lies 1. promiscuity is good for individuals and/or society and 2. sex is a sport, it is athletic and you must do it frequently and well then brag about it or you are missing out on the human experience or you’re less than human/adult. Those are both evil ways to think, if you look. Many of feminism’s problems would dry up if neither of those cruel mindsets applied to people.

It’s like introverts and extraverts, both groups will always exist.
They shine in different times but now society is larger, populations denser and we’re supposed to stay civilized.

When society favours one, things go wrong. Naturally, the sexual experiment has shown all those pesky religious types were right – adultery is up, children have more psychiatric issues than ever, various fetishes are normalized, deviants such as pedophiles are gaining acceptance in tolerance, and undeniably, there are now STDs which cannot be treated. This is a regression, society is devolving and going backwards.
Those with a natural sense of temperance and what’s been called sexual modesty, and it is natural and good to be modest (we evolved for small tribes after all) will naturally feel disgust to those.. lacking.
Those lacking it won’t understand it, and choose to project their feelings of confusion and shame onto those who feel an emotion they cannot, labeling it wrong and unnatural to soothe their conscience (it’s really prostitution the longer you think about the requirements, all intended to serve).

This is the one type of freedom that is bad for humans. Always has been. The neuro-pull is too strong.
It might be acceptable – if contraception didn’t exist.
However, sexuality is the most destructive force in society and contraception makes this more toxic.
Sex is neither a need nor a right. Never has been. It is a drive and desire.
Society must never confuse the words. This is the big lie.
It doesn’t help that a cynical society only sexualises (even children) to sell you things, to use this weakness against your best interest.

Video: Virgin before marriage or not?

Literally the best video I’ve ever seen on this topic.

Pair bonding is chemical and sex-based.

That glue is meant to be for marriage and pair bonding is impaired in both sexes.

The haters will be jealous you aren’t rushing to the divorce courts.

Cheating risk is lower too.

It’s all around better.

I disagree with the idea that she isn’t superior. Morally, she is superior. She demonstrated the virtue of chastity, that makes her superior. She just doesn’t use it as an excuse to treat normal people like dirt, which is arrogance.

Related.

Comic: The hypocrisy of men

hypocrisyofmen

So many places I could go with this one, I’ll just leave it, for posterity. [see signalling right]

Because it’s completely moral to select a wife that’s had more dick than ancient whores*, while insisting other men only settle for The Best, but don’t dare bring up what you literally did.

*or Mata Hari

*or Maya Angelou (yes, a hooker)

Don’t take sex advice from a feminist

They want to screw you over.
If there are no good girls, the men can’t preferentially choose you to marry later, can they?

http://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/laura-perrins-my-advice-dont-take-advice-on-sex-from-a-batty-feminist/

“What the feminists of the sexual revolution have done is unleashed a tidal wave of sexual anarchy particularly against young girls.

Peggy Orenstein’s book Girls and Sex has been reviewed as ‘horrifying.’ In it, it documents a 18-year-old high-school senior who says she would never hang out with one of her guy friends alone because he would expect her to perform oral sex.”

The real-time consequences of widespread porn addiction.

‘Sex education’ is 100% to blame for this. Being a slut is encouraged, and being frigid a personal failure. The boys are encouraged to coerce the girls, that’s rape culture.

“It’s not that they’d force themselves on you,…..It’s just that there would be pressure.” We are told this is a very common experience for young women today.
…One section caught my eye. “Myths about virginity’. It tells us, “Virginity is a dodgy concept. It comes from the patriarchal oppressive [DS: citation needed] need to control women’s sexuality, i.e. it’s a load of rubbish. So, we’re here to dispel those damaging virginity myths…” When you start shaming the virgins, you know you are in trouble.”

They’re already controlling female sexuality, by demanding sex as a right to another’s body.
The Sexual Revolution was the best thing to ever happen to horny, low status men (who can’t support or keep a wife). R-types love feminism, for shaming women into acting as their free whores.

Erasure, literally saying those people don’t exist.
Virgin shaming is a real term, being used. Rarely.

“…Secondly, and this is important, the feminists changed the default setting from one where sex took place after marriage, to sex – whenever you wanted. In others words, it became an entitlement. Combine this with the greater male sex drive and women were always going to lose out.”

clapping well done you tony

The data has shown earlier age at first intercourse is closely related to risk of severe mental illness and poor life outcomes. Promiscuity continued from this point exacerbates the problem.

Drug-resistant STDs are coming out, that will make you infertile. 

The science is clear.

Sleeping around is bad for you.

Promiscuity is an anti-social behaviour, it is individual selfishness, poor impulse control and suffering (terrible if one cannot consent, while still being a minor) at collective expense.

http://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/readers-comment-feminists-shame-girls-into-no-strings-sex/

I rarely comment on r-women.

The short-term mating strategy can only compete in the long-term by recruitment.
Reducing the opponent’s numbers by engorging them into their own ranks, like a phagocyte.
What does this require? Sex-positive propaganda, funded by the State.
In fact, Gen Y are having less sex than those above them in age, the pressure being too high and technology so alluring. The SJWs are doubling down in response to Gen Z, hoping the Millennial trend for social conservatism (but not yet economic) in the women can be stopped.

Keep pointing out the core of the ideology, nothing pisses them off less than seeing it in black and white.

Virgin, love = bad person, victim (of men)

Whore, sex = good person, victor (of men)

As if women can only overpower men with what’s between our legs.

It makes no logical sense that a woman respecting herself is a victim of other people.

For a finishing move, point out Middle Class women can afford to be sluts.
aka It’s classist to push this in state schools, as they do.

Unless, of course, they wanna kill the competition….Keep the poor women down….
Isn’t that what Rotherham was all about?
Didn’t an authority figure in those cases say the white working class girls were expected to be natural whores, and hence disbelieved when raped or harassed? Who could they turn to? Their ‘sex experts’ were telling them it was racist to reject these abusers.

With the Sexual Revolution, feminists removed the social and legal protections of chaste women.