Video: Why do people use me?

Wow.

This is more brutal than me.

“People who always have a need for approval from others give out signals that there’s something wrong with their lives.”

What to add? What to add?

Narcissists and borderlines and psychopaths will make a pretense at feeling like this and using these, to play the victim and use others. Look at outcomes. If they got what they wanted all the time, they’re not the victim here.

Link: The white slut problem is a problem of white masculinity

Namely, that it doesn’t exist.

They emulate Peter Pans on unreality TV that dress like teenagers and act like blacks, verbally and sexually.

http://www.dailystormer.com/the-white-slut-problem-is-a-problem-of-white-masculinity/

Yeah the guy is a misogynist. *shrug* His funeral. However…

No, a rapist is not Alpha. Stop.
This model was already stupid.
It’s an excuse to evade discussion of behaviours. Coaching them in veiled terms that mean something different to everyone.
But no. Actually, on the ground most women in Europe are more anti-immigrant now than the men. That’s our problem. The men are writing us off as shrill, worrying about nothing.
They are not seen as dominant, they are cowards who won’t protect their country or their families. Welfare seeking ghetto trash.
Why do you think most of the second-gen ones become terrorists, or want to?
Because they can’t get laid. They’re physically repulsive visually, borderline retarded because most of them are inbred and they smell. Really bad.

“More than shaming the sluts, we need to shame other men. We need to mock them for their cuckoldry. We need to improve the race.

Men are the actors of history, not women. If women are out of control, it is the fault of men. “

Finally, some sense!

But if you bitch about Europe (he really means the EU, which is different) because you believe the Media 1% are representative, that’s as brainless as you’re accusing the women of being. Look at the Leftist protests, post-Rotherham their numbers tanked. ALL women, that one. We see what’s happening but cannot move the men past their inaction. The young ones are so soft they’re terrified of being drafted.

Link: Women are not weak

http://alphagameplan.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/women-are-not-weak.html

There are girls in Jane Austen novels better equipped to take care of themselves than today’s ‘men’. Women are known to have a measurably higher pain threshold, thanks to periods and childbirth.

dean that's enough no more internet laptop shut no no no nuhuh supernatural

Obvious point is obvious — if you go around calling a group weak, nobody thinks it’s about them...

If they were weak, you wouldn’t feel the need to point it out, and you’d probably feel pity for them.

Video: How to get revenge on the Left

#1-#1,000 pieces of advice = Don’t take pity on them.
Write it out a thousand times to get it in your head.

Turn your attention to your own and you will never run out of worthy people to help. Take pity on people who don’t deserve their lot, for the people who did the right thing and tried to be good. Save charity for good people. Bad people making excuses deserve the scorn of reality hitting them upside the face like a shovel, this is the ultimate justice and divine karma. Who are we to question the wheel of fortune? Exclude them, as rabbits fear this above all else, and mock them if they seek to emotionally blackmail you (how DARE they) after treating you like dirt when in power.

I would like to share a quote.

“And now, they find their Day is over! their power gone! and the throne of this nation possessed by a Royal, English, true, and ever constant member of, and friend to, the Church of England! Now, they find that they are in danger of the Church of England’s just resentments! Now, they cry out, “Peace!” “Union!” “Forbearance!” and “Charity!”: as if the Church had not too long harboured her enemies under her wing! and nourished the viperous blood, till they hiss and fly in the face of the Mother that cherished them!
No, Gentlemen! the time of mercy is past! your Day of Grace is over! you should have practised peace, and moderation, and charity, if you expected any yourselves!” ~ Daniel Defoe

Modesty and Equality

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/hide-and-seek/201409/should-we-be-humble

Interesting points;

Hume is tame compared to Nietzsche. For Nietzsche, our society is evidence of the triumph of Judeo-Christian slave morality over Greco-Roman master morality. Master morality originates in the strong, and is marked by values such as nobility, pride, courage, truthfulness, and trust. Slave morality, in contrast, is merely a reaction in the weak to oppression by the strong, and is marked by such values as humility, sympathy, cowardice, and pettiness. In master morality, the good is whatever is good for the strong; in slave morality, it is whatever opposes the masters. By pretending that congenital meekness is a choice that is both moral and desirable, slave morality makes a virtue out of impotence and subjugation. Thus, pride becomes a vice or sin, humility is elevated to a virtue, and the son of God washes the feet of his disciples and lets himself be crucified like a common criminal. Slave morality is a cynical and pessimistic inverse morality that involves careful subversion of the old master morality. It seeks not to transcend master morality, but, through ‘priestly vindictiveness’, to emasculate and enslave the strong by convincing them that their strengths are evil. 

Nietzsche maintains that democracy, with its obsession with freedom and equality, is in fact the heir to Christianity, even though democrats generally prefer to trace their lineage to Ancient Athens. In our society, the old and natural Greco-Roman morality vies alongside the inverted Judeo-Christian morality. Modern man is confused because he constantly has to juggle their contradictions, while himself, on the whole, being neither Christian nor ancient.

While there is much of interest in Nietzsche’s master-slave dichotomy, he and Hume seem to confound and amalgamate humility with modesty or meekness. Both modesty and humility involve self-abnegation, but whereas modesty involves self-abnegation for the sake of others or for the sake of receiving praise or adulation, humility involves self-abnegation for the sake of truth and of a higher self.

I’ve found you can perfectly predict the Left/PC/Progressivism by asking this question: what would a weak selfish narcissist trying to appear saintly and pure do?
Celebrate the low, the lowest of the low, making oneself out to be high(er than them). False modesty and when questioned, narcissistic injury. Respect nothing, worship the self and all its basest urges.