Birth rates and Western culture

I don’t think I linked to these.

Malthus and the Making of the Modern World

http://www.alanmacfarlane.com/TEXTS/Malthus_final.pdf

On the characteristic individualism of Western cultures.

https://www.britac.ac.uk/pubs/proc/files/82p171.pdf

“Weber suggested that one of the central causes of the emergence of capitalism and its associated features was the disappearance of extended family structures. … ‘freeing’ the market and the individual.

The individual didn’t exist beforehand.

It’s a common question so here you go, either you can read it or stop circling the same three questions like clueless vultures.

1.How did we get here? – Libertarians who thought they could share without loss.

2.What’s going on with our demography? – r/K but read Malthus first aka Who is alive and why?

3.Why are we different? – Individualism opposes collectivism (non-Europeans) and those differences are irreconcilable, because they are genetic.

pp.122

Nationalism must come before any capitalistic position or you lose all your resources to the outgroup. You must be fair on your own citizens or no good will come of it.

Video: What is Cultural Marxism? (short)

7 minutes-ish.

Here’s my pragmatic definition.

Hate speech against the better interests of Western Civilization and the survival of the White race of peoples native to the European continent.

Hell, I say we keep that law on the books and simply apply it to them. We know they can’t keep their mouths shut.
Their ultimate aim is the progressive eradication of Western cultures and prosperous existence of White people. When questioned on this, they will engage in Race Denialism.

They make out their opponents are mentally ill (like all tyrants suppressing dissent) when they actively celebrate their own, far higher numbers of mental disease and encourage others into the same vices that studies have shown lead to poor life outcomes (promiscuity, drug use, abnormal sexualities and identities). Studies have shown they cheat, lie and donate less to charity than their opponents, yet claim to be their moral superiors. They use their cultural hegemony to impose their immoral authority on a trajectory of societal decadence and individual degeneracy. Nothing is too low.

They are fearful of the Ingroup (genophobia) in response to the natural innate genophilia and fearful of Christians (Christophobia) in their status as classical moral arbiters and intellectual judges. There is a case for a phobia of white people and heterosexuals. These would be called something like Europaphobia and heterophobia, respectively.

They stole the Enlightenment’s idea of equality (in abstract principle, as before the law, and as humans, nothing more) and perverted it into a whole new, impossible meaning. They want us to fail.

Shame, fear and intimacy are their enemies. They are immature in their psychology and deny agency when it is convenient to play dumb for a concealed purpose.

They are creatures consumed with greed, lust, avarice/envy, and murderous hatred of their opponents, who are often the more attractive and intelligent competition.

Social justice is, in fact, anti-social revenge.

Video: European r-types disrespect the dead they caused

I don’t see that as a musical tribute.

I see that as a victory lap.

‘Peace’ in the leftist mind involves gunning down every evil white family in their native homeland. It’s a signal to the terrorists they let in and endorse with ‘Islamophobia’ rhetoric – we won’t fight you.

He’s doing the equivalent of dancing on their graves.

Did you get that signal?

OT: Sharia is sedition. Treason, high treason.

Their ‘special’ shield won’t stop bullets. Don’t make the idiotic mistake of trying to save these stupid people from themselves. They have proven time again they are insane, they are mad, they refuse to change course or see the direct consequence of their action and lie about something staring them in the face. That is psychotic delusion, it is madness.

To lighten the tone.

Link: How Social Justice paved the way for a Caliphate

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1300

It used to be;

White man good.
Brown man bad.

Since people were generally honest about the source of achievement and crime, respectively.

Now it’s;

White man bad.
Brown man good.

Why? The white men would rather a life of ease and indulgence, like the fat sloths at the end of the Roman Empire as the Barbarians swarmed in. Keep playing your video games and watching tentacle porn, guys. I’m sure they’ll let you stay.

This article is superb.

applause

Islamic State hate the West for existing

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/islamic-state/11998324/Islamists-hate-us-and-their-aim-is-to-kill-us.-We-have-a-choice-kill-or-be-killed.-Which-is-it-to-be.html

I love correcting idiots on this.

“They hate us for what we’ve done to them.”

“Make them look bad by existing, yes.”

“No, the wars.”

“When? Do you count the Crusades, where they tried to invade the West, cos they fucking do.”

“We shouldn’t have invaded them though. That makes us just as bad.”

“That’s why they stopped. We didn’t start shit but we sure as shit finished it.”

Or the short version:

Sorry for existing. 

blackadder I know sarcastic

Video: The Decline and Fall of the West & Biohistory

http://www.biohistory.org/biohistory-explained/

Biohistory is the study of the biological roots of human social behavior including the outbreak of wars, economic growth and decline, forms of government, and the rise and fall of civilizations. Biohistory proposes that changes in these areas reflect changes in the prevailing temperament of the population, which is in turn rooted in epigenetics.

I’d compare this to a systems theory level of knowledge.

Includes videos;

and one upcoming.

Link: You wanted it, you got it

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/if-that-it-what-you-want-ok-have-it-see.html

…The fact is, we need to be destroyed. And we have decided to do the job ourselves. And we are being allowed to do it.

*

Even after decades of self-inflicted decline, modern Man is too powerful – because we consistently abuse all the power we have, and every new power.

Supposing the world was still full of scientific geniuses, and that people were still as intelligent, educated and self-motivated as they used-to be? –  Supposing we still made major technical breakthroughs? – What would we use them for? – Supposing there were still great composers, writers, philosophers? – What kind of beliefs would they be inspiring in us? …

Ouch.

…And the whole process is concealed by our rooted cultural preference for dishonesty and delusion. Another choice with consequences.

ouch ow pain