Indian mutiny or excuse to rape?

Freedom fighting isn’t a cover for raping a bunch of white women but okay, history. OK.

http://larrymcelhiney.com/Sepoy/Sepoy_Women.pdf

It’s difficult to find discussions of this.

As Jenny Sharpe has shown, other accounts invoked the ultimately unrepresentable rape of British women through hints and innuendoes

If you want to liberate your race, why murder white babies and rape the mothers or their daughters?

This was the rape gang scandal of its time and inspired paintings.

There are some acts of atrocity so abominable that they will not even bear narration…
We cannot print these narratives—they are too foul for publication. We should have
to speak of families murdered in cold blood—and murder was mercy!—of the violation
of English ladies in the presence of their husbands, of their parents, of their children—and
then, but not till then, of their assassination

Who talks about this?

In similar terms of unrepresentability, the Englishwoman’s Review reported in August
1857 that “the details of the sufferings and barbarities endured by English women and
children almost surpass imagination

Back when men were men and protected their women.

Unless you wanna claim you can install the greatest Empire ever and not be a Patriarchy.

Which I don’t think anyone is going to claim.

The Englishwoman’s Review (and Drawing Room Journal of Social Progress,
Literature and Art) was published from 1857 to 1859 and was, according to Margaret
Bentham, a “proto-feminist” journal that sought “to address the women of England
from the women’s point of view”.[31] Although it identified the lack of occupation for
middle class women as a pressing social problem, the Englishwomen’s Review refused
“to prate of women’s rights”, and rather redefined “rights” and “occupation” in more
feminized terms as “usefulness and kindness”.[32] In its extensive coverage of the conflict
in India, the Englishwomen’s Review focused on the fate of British women. As Vron
Ware explains,
the paper adopted the tone of the aggrieved victim, giving full encouragement to the
brave men who survived to avenge their sex. Accounts of dead children, of rooms filled
with blood, matted hair, mangled toys, rotting clothes, would all have had a particular
impact in the pages of a woman’s paper which aimed to reinforce the conventional
female role in the domestic sphere.[

The men were scared to cover this.

In its coverage of female victims in the ‘mutiny’ and its calls to avenge their suffering,
articles in the Englishwoman’s Review closely resembled those that appeared in more
mainstream newspapers with largely male readers such as the Times and the Illustrated
London News. But, at the same time, another newspaper that was addressed to female
readers interpreted events in India in markedly different ways. Although the Lady’s
Newspaper and Pictorial Times reflected the same domestic concerns as the Englishwoman’s
Review, its interpretation of events in India was very different. Unlike the
Englishwoman’s Review, the extensive coverage of the ‘mutiny’ in the Lady’s Newspaper
included several vehement protests against ‘the war cry “For the Ladies and the
Babies!” ’[34]

Those are the SJWs. Nowadays they’d work in Rotherham.

But its coverage of the Indian uprising came to eclipse all other
stories in 1857 because “every other matter is just now of secondary importance. The
magnitude of the atrocities and the immensity of the stake have united to secure the
public mind, and it is satisfied only with what has reference to the great rebellion”.[36]

This used to be common knowledge, do your schools mention this? Haha no. Don’t be silly. All Indians were Gandhi and their holy men never rape little girls, they just sleep in the same room alone to “test” themselves.

In August, the Lady’s Newspaper pleaded that:
If there is a political necessity for wholesale butchery, let it not be done in the name of
woman; if the women and the children of our country have been the victims of the
heathen, it is not so we would have them avenged; if we cannot raise these barbarians
to our own light, let us not sink into their darkness; if we sicken with horror at their
atrocities, let us not follow in their blood-stained footsteps.[37]

Victorian “If you kill your enemies, they win”.

Honour doesn’t win you wars but it’s a good start.

In the context of masculine discourses of honour, heroism, and revenge,
the prestige of the British army and its success in reestablishing British rule were
inextricably linked to its ability either to protect or to avenge British women.

If you can’t defend your women and children you are not a man and deserve neither.

It’s very simple.

That’s their traditional purpose of living!

Anyway, read around.

Indians were not dorky sidekicks in a shitty sitcom.

That’s like thinking all gay men are toe-tapping effete sweethearts.

http://blog.chinadaily.com.cn/thread-746985-1-1.html

In 1857, British rule in India was challenged when Indian sepoy troops of the British Indian Army began a year-long insurrection against the British. To the British, the most shocking aspect of the events in India was the massacre of white women and children by Indian men. There was extensive coverage in the press and illustrated journals, which stimulated calls for revenge..

In newspaper accounts, parliamentary debates and visual images, the severity of the conflict came to be embodied by the fate of British women and the defilement of their bodies and their homes.

Historically, we’ll be the same.

Paton’s famous painting In Memoriam was dedicated by the artist to the Christian heroism of “British Ladies in India during the Mutiny of 1857.” In 1858, the first version of the painting, which depicted Indian sepoy troops bursting through the door, was exhibited at the Royal Academy of Art in London.

Ideologically, the Rebellion dramatically increased racial antagonisms between Britons and Indians. On the British side, this was in large part due to the savage attack on British women and children, who were allegedly being raped and murdered by fanatic soldiers in alarming numbers. The British had to have a heroic fight against depraved sepoys intent on rape and murder of innocent and helpless English women and children.

The depth of public reaction to the murders was due in large part to the lurid nature of the published accounts. Though papers frequently argued that the ‘vile tortures’ practised upon British women and children should “be remembered, not told,” all of them did in fact ‘tell’ of rape and torture in graphic detail.

but not the babies
Indians had the original fetish for baby rape, it’s the tribal rumour thing. I wouldn’t be shocked if the African HIV thing originally came from India. They cover wounds in cow shit and drink from the corpse strewn Ganges. I saw a photo taken of what looked like a dog playing with a football, just out of a tourist area. No, head of a child.

None of them care. It’s savagery of the first order.

To assume everyone has a conscience is very white privilege.

Letters and telegraphs flooded the papers with accounts of women being raped in front of their children before being killed, of matted blood, gory remains of children’s limbs, and of the suffocation of living children among their dead mothers when the victims were thrown into a well.

Such graphic tales of rape and murder inflamed public sentiments calling for vengeance on a massive scale. The Illustrated London News voiced its indignation in tandem with most other national, provincial, and local papers when it claimed that “every British heart, from the highest to the humblest of the land, glows with honest wrath, and demands justice, prompt and unsparing, on the bloodyminded instruments of the Rebellion.”

Nowadays?

Strangers (swarthy strangers) on the internet encourage you not to care, because women and children supposedly “deserve it” for things voted in before their birth. Well, if we do end up running a black flag over a monarch’s dead body, the men who refused to defend this country will “deserve” to lose their head.

You had one job.

About Cheddar Man

Had to wade in

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinosaur_coloration

We don’t even know the colour of dinosaurs 100%. They might’ve been flamingo fucking pink for all we know.

By comparison, Neanderthal.

But there are faked versions deliberately intended to make blue eyed red-heads (we have mummies) look distinctly African, despite sharing ZERO DNA.

Wow. That’s racist. It reminds me of old American slavery posters.

Now, eye colour is complex but you can make an educated guess, they couldn’t totally make up the eye colour.

To say it’s blue, it’s gotta be blue. You’d expect this from the Ice Age.

The eye colour evolution would’ve had to come after a skin one.

Nobody with blue eyes has skin this dark (mixed race are discounted).

Why?

This person would’ve died from Vitamin D deficiency.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/vitamin-d-deficiency-migrant-health-guide

Read A Troublesome Inheritance, we’re too far north to have evolved that.

A 5,000 year old Celtic woman

Common Celtic face

Here’s an Irishman, 2300 years old

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clonycavan_Man

who wore make-up and hair gel.

Here’s Old Croghan Man in another reconstruction with what is considered the strongest tan physically possible, since the skin is lighter genetically in whites then the sun tanned it. He ain’t getting any darker.

Here’s the previous Cheddar Man reconstruction.

Who looks like surviving, living descendants.

This video explains the Cheddar Man’s specifically white-skinned DNA

It’s good archaeology is exposing itself as liars, OOA is absurd since we sequenced Neanderthals, where do you think they evolved?

I’m glad they’re lying. We needn’t lose any sleep over fraud charges down the line. It’s public money, fraud is a crime.

Description

“CHEDDAR MAN: He does already have genes that are associated with extremely light skin pigmentation and freckles in modern day Europeans namely IRF4 and he was heterozygous for one of the red hair mutations which in and of itself causes a lot of depigmentation. I think the authors overplayed their hand on this new algorithm which is not freely available to the public and rushed to conclusions with a clear political intent.

They rushed for a cover-up.

So yes the algorithm might have predicted that the person skin color was the darkest two tones; but the prediction could have been crap!

Are the global warming people working on these predictions?

The 10 SNPs panel predicts it to have Black skin based on 4 SNPs; however Loschbour get a vastly different prediction when adding 3 more SNPs in spite of having a similar genetic profile in those SNPs.”

JF had a video but it was taken down

It was here

“The Cheddar Man Fraud Exposed: Prof. JF Gariepy, biologist.”

Why fear a biologist speaking, huh?

6th century man

The Roman reported us as wearing woad, completely shaven except the scalp and in men, the upper lip. Yes, men rocked the mustache. Black people wearing woad aren’t bright blue, liars.

Even Egyptians weren’t that dark!

There are plenty of ancient references to them being blue-eyed and blond!

Hence this death mask commonality

Literal hair grown out of their heads.

[Most mummies aren’t blond, so it cannot possibly be a result of the process.]

And if race “doesn’t exist”, you can’t claim anyone’s “black”, a racial classification, and further, it’s not solely based on skin tone? And isn’t saying someone less than white = black, the one drop rule?

JF does give me concerns though.

Why are all the creeps atheists?

“Unfortunately we live in an authoritarian state supported by people like you, moral fags, who keep me from doing that.”

Boy, are they in for a shock when they die. Like, the Mr Pointy kind in a warm locale.

Link Who is ‘We’, paleface?

http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/05/21/whos-we-paleface/

The liberals are currently being eaten by their own.

Cthulhu still swimming left, I see.

Start from there: the original sin of whiteness.
Do the work: for me, me, me, fellow white.

You are imagining things.

There’s no white genocide.

https://ccsre.stanford.edu/courses/2017-2018-csre-136

If only we had a competing one. We could call it Western Civ.
How long until they float the idea of putting whites on reservations?

https://explorecourses.stanford.edu/search?view=catalog&filter-coursestatus-Active=on&page=0&catalog=&q=CSRE+136%3A+White+Identity+Politics&collapse=

http://time.com/4585232/white-deaths-exceed-births-united-states/

Post-election, how useful.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/explainers-39672093

Why are young Americans being blamed for the abortions and contraceptions of Boomers and Gen X? Pay for your own fucking pensions.

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/3/23/14988084/white-middle-class-dying-faster-explained-case-deaton

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/04/anne-case-angus-deaton-study-214987

http://fortune.com/2017/03/23/death-rates-white-americans-rising/

http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/03/23/521083335/the-forces-driving-middle-aged-white-peoples-deaths-of-despair

Literally dying.

Notice anything interesting?

What’s missing here?

Wow, I feel privileged.

Try it with Muslims, I dare you. The funny thing is, if you scapegoat a dormant group, eventually they realize they’re being screwed. This does not go over well for the accusers.

They’ll remember. Kipling warned you. The warrior spirit hasn’t died.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_dividend
Then there’s the labour force giving up. Why do Millennials—-?
There’s no future.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_ratio#Inverse

The inverse of the dependency ratio, the inverse dependency ratio can be interpreted as how many independent workers have to provide for one dependent person (pension & expenditure on children).

Calculate that and make sure there are no ropes nearby.

Demographic disaster has no formal definition.

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/white_minority

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/1/26/14340542/white-fear-trump-psychology-minority-majority

The results suggest that “a sense of a zero-sum competition between groups is activated,” Craig tells me. When people hear about the rise of one group, they automatically fear it will mean a decline in their own.

This is maths.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survival_of_the_fittest

What do you think the memes are about?

Mass immigration: mistake or Marxist strategy?

Comments are 24K.

http://quillette.com/2017/08/27/argument-open-borders-liberal-hubris/

It isn’t hubris, it’s Cloward-Piven.

They want to destroy the welfare state to free up the lower orders for their Marxist revolution.

Diversity + Proximity = War.

They want a class war.

They know IQ is real, they’re importing shock troops. Bankers don’t fight their own wars.
Military-age fit men who are stupid and have no loyalty to the country they reside in. K.

Ah, typical r-type Fifth Columnists. Profit>Principles.

Because they aren’t actually natives to the countries they’re controlling.

They’re colonialists. Empire-builders.

Supranationalism is the 20th century’s answer to nationalism.

By reducing living standard, there are less expectations on the slave drivers.
Sorry, corporations.

Governments don’t run your country, NGOs do.

Ask yourself – where do all these profits go? Which countries?

Are you allowed to ask?

Mass immigration doesn’t even exist. It’s a neologism.

It meets the criteria for invasion.

Hence the jocular immvasion.

What white genocide?

Source: DFP

The demographic problem is everywhere BUT Europe. Try maths.

Once is enough.

The only population at sustainable levels is Europe – the rest of the world has the problem.

This, after we invented contraception and literally handed them it for free.
Monkeys use contraceptives.
Monkeys.

Notice anything unusual about the picture on the left?
Not postmodern, is it?

Source: DFP

It’s because the baby is white.
I guarantee it.
All the hospital charities, primarily GOS, fall over themselves to do anything for brown children. They will literally import them, then tell Brits there aren’t enough beds and shrug as white kids suffer and die.

Look it up. You can see that’s the only difference.

LA never disappoints

They have full range.

https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/white-men-are-our-greatest-allies-they-hate-white-women-as-much-as-we-do-they-love-women-of-color.1212566/#post-31772662

I would like to point out that white men are our greatest allies. Yes, 62% of white men voted for Trump, but that is expected of them. The largest betrayal was 53% of white women voting for Trump. I hate them so much; the world would be a better place if white women all died, quite frankly. This includes the ones who are married to men of color like Madchen Amick and Ali Landry.
The 38% of white men who did not vote for Trump are our biggest allies because they truly have the power in the world. They are educated, wealthy, handsome, and successful. They use their power to uplift all minorities and they are passing on their wealth to minorities by marrying women of color.”

What White Fever?
Speaking of Our Men

you seem pressed.

https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/plain-looking-american-woman-in-japan-is-sad-that-she-cant-get-attention-poordat.832407/page-12#post-20912124

Anyway, I disagree. I hate white women (most are unattractive, envious, entitled, jealous), but I like most white men. I think white men are fine with their power crumbling. That’s why they date out the most. Their children with their nonwhite wives will obviously be nonwhite, too, and they will pass whatever wealth, assets, and benefits they have to those nonwhite children. They are contributing to the diminishing of the white supremacy structure and that’s a good thing.
Besides, white men are preferred by most. They have no reason to be insecure or envious of other men since they are the top of the food chain. White women, on the other hand, do … since not even their own men prefer them. They are trashed across the Internet, but white men are not. There are Tumblrs, threads, and other sites dedicated to white men who are with women of other races. There are NO things such as that dedicated to white women.”

This is what they really think about your Yellow Fever arse, they’re winning the gender war and the white genocide one. They are 100% woke on it. So when I see white men start insulting his own race bc Feminism, I want to strangle him for entirely justified reasons.
Race traitors sell us out.

https://www.lipstickalley.com/xfa-blog-entry/blog-53-abuse-what-happens-when-you-argue-with-a-narcissist.4918/
Then there are great posts.
The key is to never show a narcissist you’re being harmed by them. Negative people who want to bring about discord to pacify their inner chaos do not know how to respond to kindness and calmness. For them, it is an impenetrable barrier. They only know one thing and that is to create discord and see you suffer as a result. If they do not have their reaction, in either situation, they become absolutely powerless and they’ll show you what lies beneath without being able to control it. The vexation and agitation will build up in them to such an intent, that it’ll be a catastrophic explosion of rage etc that will obliterate the mask, the facade and hidden agenda.”

“The best advice posted in this blog is to emotionally detach and be unreachable. Be the unruly character that won’t be pigeonholed. This unnerves them to the core. When approached, I become Mr Spock, I don’t emote and I make them feel like they are being inspected and studied so that they avoid me. Ha!
They’re automatons, formulaic machines. Their response to seeing you pressed for time, rushing is to engage you by offering salutations and conversations to covertly frustrate you. If you nod while keeping it moving, you’ve ad libbed and gone off script!”

Hello bitch shield my old friend….

Things only attractive women know. They prey on politeness. But you’re not obliged to talk to strangers, actually – you’re not supposed to?
If they can’t be introduced via work or social circle, there’s a class conflict anyway.
Don’t bother with a Federline. REMEMBER FEDERLINE.

never 4get

Like, the fullest range.

https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/instagram-th-ts-before-and-after-head-transplant-russian-edition.950189/page-27#post-30874353

“These girls are gorgeous, now. But, what I thought was hilarious is what I heard from a guy.. he said something I never thought of.
These men marry a stunning beauty, but they don’t realize they’re in for a huge shock when their kids come out with the features of her real face. Classic.”
10/10

Beauty is an advert for genes.

“Generally, I tend to have an idea on what sort of surgeries these women have had but I didn’t realize that some were getting lower eyelid surgeries and lip implants. I’m not sure if the video is in Russian or Ukrainian but I know it’s one of the two. ”
White women do the fake femininity thing too.
I didn’t post before because I hadn’t found fitting examples until now, I’m not excluding my own race.

Not a patch on Aaliyah, if we’re comparing races.

It’s a mistake I’ve pointed out before to apply individual judgements based on group-level differences.
The world doesn’t work like that, you have to look at the individual. If the group is SO (thing) then the individual will be too.

“The Russians sure do know how to do some lips. They need to bring their ass over here so these white housewives can stop hurting my eyesight.”


“The Koreans are the wizards of plastic surgery. If OP does a thread for them, you’d better be sitting down while you scroll. The Russians come in close second and the Brazilians are third.”

Men need to be informed.

See? I’m not being racist (today), I’m being bitchy. All races are doing this, but in different ways and I think it shits on various men from different heights. That is wrong.