“Ray Global Education, which owns two U.K.-based private schools, says the acquisitions were a part of its “Global Campus” project that seeks to promote the CCP’s Belt & Road infrastructure and global influence initiative in the global education sector.”
boot them out, all of them
“The company’s president Hu Jing told Chinese state-run media in 2019 that he runs the business in accordance with “political laws, educational laws, and economic laws.””
we follow your law so let us own you? dafuq?
“”No matter how international the school is, it is still fundamentally a Chinese school, and it must pay close heed to the political environment,” Hu told journalists.”
Take the estate agents and put ((them)) on trial for treason.
“Even if you shut down the Confucius Institute, the CCP has other ways in, including the acquisition of private schools,” Wang said. “I don’t think Western countries have yet realized the extent of the CCP’s involvement here.”
I TRIED WARNING THEM.
“These British politicians really are idiots,” Ma told RFA. “China is using their economy to gain a political voice, but they have no idea how to resist them.”
They will turn all the future politicians into communists.
Is Britain for sale?
“The U.K. has turned itself into a trading outpost of China, not just in terms of business, economy and trade, but also in terms of culture,” Ma said. “[U.K.] universities, research institutes, secondary and primary schools have invested a lot of money in China.”
cut off their funding, on grounds of national security they get taxpayer money and answer to the people, they do NOT get to funnel money offshore
“This is all about targeting the next generation, educationally speaking,” Ma said.
White men really are cucks.
The Hurun Research Institute reported in 2018 that more than 80 percent of China’s wealthiest families plan to send their children to overseas schools, with nearly one third saying they would choose schools in the U.K.
To obtain blackmail material.
“British brands are also particularly attractive to Chinese parents, who think about the aristocratic British accent and lifestyle,” An told RFA.
Nation for sale, why bother with all the wars?
According to a 2020 report from the Independent Schools Council (ISC), China has sent more students to private U.K. schools than any other country, a total of 10,864 at the time of the survey.
And middle-class parents wonder why little Timmy can’t get a place.
ONE BILLION STRONG COMPETITION. Is the immigration funny now?
Why can’t English people get married, move out and breed?
“Mar, who represents the National Coalition For Men”
there it is, hardly an American name is it?
“and two individual men challenging the law”
let’s see names and faces of the gamma bitches who want women to die for them while they sit high and pretty as Secret Kings
draft those three and only those three
NO more male supremacy propaganda if you’re too weak to even sign up for a draft you claim doesn’t matter.
No more muh Patriarchy bullshit. You are males, not men. Men fight for what they believe in, and not just through a keyboard. You are not a real man by living to age 18.
Women don’t have the upper body strength to serve, end of story. Internal organs are different too, from the spine structure to the lung capacity. Women literally do not have military endurance. They also make great POWs, especially for rape, and if nuked, the infertility means winning the war cannot happen. Since the group is genetically dead. No instinct to protect their women > low T. Cowards like this were the reason we kicked boys out of the tribe at puberty, to let nature finish them off if they were yellow little snakes.
DO YOU WANT GENDER ROLES OR NOT?
NO WAH WAH WAH IT’S HARD. DYING IN BATTLE IS LESS PROBABLE THAN MATERNAL MORTALITY IN AMERICA, WHICH HAS GONE WAY WAY UP.
MRAs are just anti-white female, in the same way SJWs are anti-white male. It’s all anti-white and literally most white people are the women, sorry to tell ya.
Yet more genocidal mewling. Cultural Marxism claims everyone is biologically the same. Christianity doesn’t dispute this biological difference used by evolution/chromosomes, but adds God gave us equal yoking in spiritual value. So it’s anti-Christ, too.
Hillary Clinton wanted to pass this. Should tell you.
Starting to think God made women bear children because many men would’ve been too cowardly and opted out, making us go dodo. Men are fonder of abortion in surveys, not wanting to ban it in case god forbid they’re held responsible for once in their lives.
“If the court agrees to hear the case, it wouldn’t be deciding whether women have to register, just whether the current system is constitutional. If it isn’t, then it would then be up to Congress to decide how to respond, either by passing a law requiring everyone to register or deciding registration is no longer necessary.”
So it’s an offshoot of tranny stuff. Great.
“The issue of who has to register for the draft has been to the court before. In 1981, the court voted 6-3 to uphold the men-only registration requirement. At the time, the decision was something of an outlier because the court was regularly invalidating gender-based distinctions in cases about other areas of the law. Many of those cases were brought by the founding director of the ACLU’s Women’s Rights Project, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who became a justice in 1993.”
Unpatriotic scum gonna be unpatriotic. You’re on Ginsburg’s side of history.
Women are the national security, securing its literal biological future.
“The case about the draft is National Coalition For Men v. Selective Service System, 20-928.”
I think I’ve posted this before and I know I’ve recently spotlighted the dying demographic nations like Poland (lowest fertility rate in the EU).
But let’s look again and wonder how such steep changes could happen, shall we?
“Population growth in Eastern Europe is now negative, and Southern Europe is projected to join it with zero growth around 2005.
Western and Northern Europe, in contrast, are expected to maintain positive growth until around 2025 and 2040, respectively (figure 36). Declines in growth not only come earlier but are also much sharper in Eastern and Southern Europe than in Western and Northern Europe. Were international migration eliminated, zero growth in Western and Northern Europe would come instead much earlier, around 2005. With no migration, the growth trajectories for Western, Northern, and Southern Europe would still be roughly similar but would be pegged at a lower level, but the growth trajectory for Eastern Europe would be little changed. Looking beyond 2050, one sees each region return gradually to zero or slightly positive growth.”
But by all means think voting and anti-marriage propaganda will help…. It’s like demographic Santa. Babies can be wished into existence! What incentives? Also, EE, this is why you don’t traffic and pimp out your nubile young women to rich Arabs and STD-ridden tourists. You ate the demographic seed crop. If you continue to betray your women (fact: most white people are women) then you deserve to die out. Misogyny (as with misandry) are anti-natal. Figure 35 shows the wages of sin is death i.e. treason = extinction. The MRA/MGTOW anti-natal propaganda is largely the rejected gamma trying to genetically murder those above him (the coward’s way, Wormtongue) by fish bicycle logic. Surely you’re smarter than that? SJWs perform the same gamma/spiteful mutant function among women.
“The United Kingdom dominates Northern Europe demographically, with 64 per cent of regional population. Its growth trajectory is about 0.1 points higher than that for Northern Europe as a whole. The region also includes three small Baltic countries with economies in transition: Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Their growth trajectories are radically different, being even more negative than that for Eastern Europe. The remaining European countries with economies in transition are all in Eastern Europe, except for Albania and the successor states to Yugoslavia, which are in Southern Europe. However, growth in Albania and the former Yugoslav republics is not that different from, and actually slightly higher than, growth in Southern Europe as a whole. Southern Europe is dominated by Italy and Spain, whose projected slow growth is reflected in the regional trajectory.”
Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. Reprobate mind? Sexually decadent cultures?
“Projected fertility trends are consistent with the growth trends. Some initial fertility decline further below replacement is expected in this decade, except in Western Europe, where fertility is believed to have hit bottom in the early 1990s and has risen slightly since then (figure 38).” That’s Labour immigration policy.
“Each region is then assumed to reach total fertility of 1.85 by 2045-2050, with Northern and Western Europe progressing along a higher trajectory than Southern and Eastern Europe. Within the following quarter century, fertility is then expected to rise further to replacement level, with Southern Europe lagging behind the other regions.”
Yet I find it hilarious that Eastern Europe is taking the most degenerate of white trash immigrants, the PUAs. They’ll soon learn it isn’t even race of the immigrant, it’s whether they’ll render your local population infertile with STDs and cause local disruption with their carousing. Like the Vikings, they’ll take your women. It’s the rule. And if the local women refuse, like Taharrush, they’ll be forced. I’d expect druggings to become commonplace (including alcohol spikings) whenever PUAs move into an area.
Sort your incitement to rape laws NOW. Protect your culture. Don’t become like NY or London. Do not let the sexual locusts eat your nubile seed crop. r-types emigrate.
“Fertility stays at current levels in the constant projection scenario, which leads to incredibly large numbers for world population. For the European population, however, it leads instead, in the long run, to startlingly low numbers. By 2300, Western, Southern, and Northern Europe would each have only 28-30 million people, and Eastern Europe would have only 5 million. The European Union,which has recently expanded to encompass 452-455 million people (according to 2000 or 2005 figures) would fall by 2300 to only 59 million. About half the countries of Europe would lose 95 per cent or more of their population, and such countries as the Russian Federation and Italy would have only 1 per cent of their population left. Although one might entertain the possibility that fertility will never rise above current levels, the consequences appear sufficiently grotesque as to make this seem improbable.”
95 per cent or more of their population
and party countries like Italy and the world’s strip club Russia:
only 1 per cent of their population left
“sufficiently grotesque” is code for effective genocide folks
Also: You don’t judge whether something is POSSIBLE by emotional appeal.
See, you don’t need to kill everyone, just most of them, to prevent a functioning economy, especially the young people, and if you can keep them bachelors so much the better, because white people need to marry first before they breed. Distractions include careerism, the gym and notch counting.
“These changes take a century. Quicker societal adjustments are necessary when demographic change is rapid in the short-run, though such demographic changes tend to be more difficult to predict. Table 9 shows the highest and lowest growth rates expected for each country in any period between 2000 and 2300. Most of the largest positive growth rates appear in 2000-2005, while fertility is still high in various countries. The largest negative growth rates appear close to 2050 or beyond 2100, when countries enter a period of below-replacement fertility. European countries tend to show slowest growth earlier, African countries later, except for some Southern African countries where slow growth appears around 2020-2030 because of HIV/AIDS.”
or a SARs bioweapon.
Yet the anti-natal channels on Youtube are the only kind exempt from the so-called ‘redpill’ ban hammer.
Makes ya think. Activates the almonds. Rustles my jimmies. I wonder (((why))). They hate white males and they’re telling them to nix their genome with the snip or race mixing. I wonder why those channels are up? Why are so many pick-up artists non-white? And yes, that includes the Jews. When do we get the AQ – the Asian Question of them inserting themselves into our culture and policies? Hello fellow hwyte male. Let them slice your balls.
That’s the Boomer fallout, the consequences of all the dysgenic policies, from abortion to the Pill to free love/hook-up/whoredom to Asian and African immigration/invasion. I know some of you didn’t vote for it, it still exists. I’ll be considered generationally along Trigglypuff so deal with it.
TABLE 8 is a sobering read.
e.g. Croatia, millions of population, -27 by 2100, maximum 0% change. Stop importing degenerates.
Israel 63M by 2100, curious. 70% + max change. Almost like they knew.
Poland -33M by 2100. By all means, let degenerates immigrate. Make it worse.
BY contrast, Somali 658 million. Not a typo.
Serbia, -26 million by 2100. Were the shekels worth it?
I’m sorry I base my opinions on data.
By comparison, so-called cucked Sweden minus 8 million by 2100.
So Eastern Europe is literally worse off than the Swedes. Nobody says anything. Controlled ops.
UK gains 10M, mostly non-Anglo, I’d wager. The native pop is suppressed by (economic) factors and anti-marriage propaganda.
America gains 53M, mostly mystery meat if you look at new births and white deaths. Thanks, Boomers.
Yemen gains 700M. Not a typo.
“In 2000-2005, 56 countries, out of 192, have total fertility of 4.0 or higher. By 2045-2050, the number will be zero. Instead, 139 countries will have total fertility under 2.0. Beyond 2050, however, the progression is not unilinear. The number of countries with fertility below 2.0 will fall, as more and more countries return to a replacement level just above 2.0. But fertility levels of 2.2 or higher are not expected to return.”
So Marxism of any kind (including precious socialists) will go the way of the dodo. The production simply won’t be there to leech from.
You read the rest. This century, the white man dies. If they endorsed anti-natal practices, it’s deserved. Revenge is mine, saith the LORD.
We need exogenic wombs, it seems. Because there won’t be enough fertile women to go around.
If you want blood of the indigenous our leaders fucked up, try the Irish. We literally sold to foreigners the ample food supply we had (happens now with China and domestic food prices for us, as covered) and let them starve to death, including the women and children. Who needs a Holodomor when you have… whatever this is? Free trade is practically slavery, pass it on. Technically, arguments could be made for agrarian treason. We paid for those farmers to labour and toil for our plate, with our taxes. Monarchies have noblesse oblige. France learned the hard way. As I always said, we need national (loyal) capitalism, to protect the workers and People.
Do you really own your country if the CCP is buying up your precious farmland? Estate agents were despised for this reason, historically. They’ll sell you from under your very feet, no care for wars and national loyalty.
nb How is soaking a flag with blood, NOT incitement? What’s next, burning a Guy? He was white so….? I guess Catholicism was the first religion of pieces, technically. Which is the best kind of correct. Just like the Munster rebellion had the first religious rape gangs in Europe, under the guise of E Q U A L I T Y. The Left are seldom original.
Duh? Nothing to do with women, who always worked. That was a false flag by Peterson, who curiously didn’t show any data (because that data does not exist). Women always worked, even in pre-industry, except the royalty and certain aristocrats. That is nowhere near most women, let alone all. Contrary to Peterson’s nagging, Western incomes are still high internationally, so what would explain the 60s-00s replacement of the working class, but globalisation broadly and international competition from mass immigration locally? Naturally his lefty politics won’t allow him to finger the true culprit because that raises uncomfortable questions for his age group.
Missionaries violated the Bible by giving gibs to heathens, as in ‘those who will not work, shall not eat’. https://www.worlddata.info/average-income.php But y’know, that’s just actually looking for the DATA. UK average income $42k. Meanwhile places with an intact culture (relatively) and plausibly more K-family units (read: high marriage rates) have super low incomes and larger families as the norm still. e.g. Poland $15.2k Croatia $14.9k Russia $11.2k Serbia $16.1k Hungary $7k since you all have such a hard-on for the EE nations
so it’s a blatant FALLACY to conflate income with family formation in white people
with ONGOING data to prove it decisively (no muh 21st century is different)
losers: “it’s all about the money! that’s why women don’t want me!” sure
and population has gone up steadily e.g. Russia. https://www.worlddata.info/europe/russia/populationgrowth.php The data is out there but the fake redpill refuse to admit immigration is the problem and always has been (because literally most of them are immigrants, Magic Dirt men playing hello fellow white man). They wish to foment mutual white hatred (r-select impulse, the spiteful mutant) and what are the two biggest demographics in any race? Men v. women. Men stop protecting the women, women are easy prey. Divide, conquer. Cowardly but dysgenic.
The rise of the East has killed the West and the traditional breeding stock of the working class. Globalisation kills. Blaming the in-group is what the Globalists want, it produces further sterility and prevents you from questioning them (political triangulation), see: SJWs salivating over causing a gender war and larping as white women when they aren’t (religiously).
Did women get the vote in 1995, ya morons?
example of this all with EE nations again:
Poland has one of the lowest birth rates in the EU (as covered before, the r-women don’t want kids when asked) but even their population has been holding steady despite emigration and low incomes. https://www.worlddata.info/europe/poland/populationgrowth.php Blaming ‘women’ for working is plain ignorant of history! Did they think their grandmothers all twiddled their thumbs? What would they prefer? Living on welfare? Starving? Working until their eggs are all gone? Those are the only options, all demographic death. Women cannot fix this and shouldn’t be blamed for it. At some point they need to man up and admit men need to correct the ‘mistakes’ of their forefathers i.e. globalisation, immigration, multiculturalism.
There was data going round, mentioned by Academic Agent, that if only women voted in the UK since WW2, no left wing government would’ve ever gotten into power since. I’d like a video on that. Shan’t hold my breath but if enough people pester him he could trigger some broflakes because the sloth of r-men votes socialism due to lower T, r-women want to work. Americans need to look at data before complaining. Why are no major MGTOW/MRA channels removed from youtube? The plan is anti-white family, duh.
Besides, adopting pure r, we physically could not outnumber them by over-breeding, they’re generations ahead of us. The baby cult cannot flatten r-numbers.
“The global fertility rate fell from 5.25 children per woman in 1900, to 2.44 children per woman in 2018. The steepest drop in this shift happened in a single decade, from 1970 to 1980.” When Boomers gave the Pill to unmarried couplesand factories moved overseas.
“The overall decline in fertility rates isn’t expected to end anytime soon, and it’s even expected to fall past 2.1 children per woman, which is known as the “replacement rate”. Any fertility below this rate signals fewer new babies than parents, leading to an eventual population decline. Experts predict that world fertility will further drop from 2.5 to 1.9 children per woman by 2100. This means that global population growth will slow down or possibly even go negative.” All socialist/Marx models rely on rising population, that’s why all their policies e.g. Sex Ed, single parent gibs, no criminal punishment for adultery, all have the same outcome. They’re breeding chattel for their pension pot. Socialists oversee the breeding of their own slaves. Dark, huh?
As Darwin suggested, evolution is a race for life, and until the overseas threats are dealt with, local solutions are null and void. The ship is sinking, stop your enemies from blowing more holes in the boat. K-selection requires a fair i.e. closed system for operation. Globalists hate this because one such system would easily outcompete them. R-types pouring into the same territory exploiting shared resources will starve all Ks.
Going by the historical definition, nations such as Finland, Sweden, Ireland, and Switzerland were Third World countries. Based on today’s definition, these would not be considered Third World countries. Instead, what many now interpret “Third World” to mean encompasses economically poor and non-industrialized countries, as well as newly industrialized countries.
The international economic order has changed in the last 40 years and will no doubt go on changing, as leading economist, Angus Maddison, explains.*
In 1962, we usually divided the world into three regions. The advanced capitalist group was then known as the developed world. The second was the “Sino-Soviet bloc”. Countries “in course of development” were the third world. The China-USSR split occurred in the early 1960s; most of the communist regimes collapsed around 1990, and the hostility of the cold war has largely faded away. The income gap between the former communist countries and the advanced capitalist group has become very much wider than it was. For this reason, a tripartite division of the world economy is no longer appropriate.
For rough comparisons, it is now useful to divide the world in two and compare developments in the advanced capitalist group with the aggregate for lower-income countries – designated as the “West” and the “Rest” in our tables. On average, the West increased its income per head fourfold from 1950 to 2001 – a growth rate of 2.8% a year. In the rest of the world there was a threefold increase – a growth rate of 2.2%. In both cases this was much better than earlier performance. From 1820 to 1950, income grew 1.3% a year in the West and 0.6% in the Rest. Though the gap in income level was still increasing, the acceleration in performance was bigger in the Rest.
Population of the West rose by half from 1950 to 2001 (0.8% a year), about the same pace as in 1820-1950. In the Rest, the situation was very different. Population grew by 2.0%, compared with 0.6% in the earlier period. This reflected a major improvement in welfare as mortality declined and life expectation rose from 44 to 65 years in 2001 – much faster than in the West. In the past two decades birth rates have fallen rapidly – a demographic transition which happened earlier in the West.
The West is now a relatively homogeneous group in terms of living standards, growth performance, economic institutions and modes of governance. Over the past five decades there has also been significant convergence in most of these respects. This is not true of the Rest. There are more than 180 countries in this group. They have nearly all increased their income levels significantly since 1950, but the degree of success has varied enormously. Most of Asia is experiencing fast per capita income growth. Most African countries are fairly stagnant. Most Latin American countries found it very difficult to keep a steady trajectory of advance in the 1980s and 1990s. Population growth is fastest in Africa, a good deal slower in Latin America and slower still in Asia. Life expectation and levels of education are lowest in Africa, better in Latin America, and better still in Asia.
Between 1950 and 2001, the Asian group increased per capita income fivefold and narrowed the relative gap between their incomes and the West. In other regions there was no convergence. Latin American income rose more than twofold, in the former command economies of Eastern Europe and the USSR less than twofold and in Africa about two thirds.
The divergence was even more striking in 1990-2001. In this period the Western group increased their income by a fifth, the Asian group by half, Latin America by a sixth, Africa stagnated and in the former communist countries per capita income fell by a quarter. [DS: WHYYYYYYY]
American policy since 1973 has been much more successful than that of Western Europe and Japan in realising potential for income growth. The incidence of unemployment is now about half of that in Western Europe, whereas in 1950–1973 it was usually double the European rate. Labour force participation increased, with employment expanding from 41% of the population in 1973 to 49% in 1998, compared with an average European rise from 42 to 44%. The percentage drop in working hours per person was half of that in Western Europe. These high levels of activity were achieved with a rate of inflation which was generally more modest than in Western Europe.
US policymakers have been less inhibited in operating at high levels of demand than their European counterparts. Having the world’s major reserve currency, and long used to freedom of international capital movements, they generally treated exchange rate fluctuations with benign neglect. The Reagan administration made major tax cuts, and carried out significant measures of deregulation in the expectation that they would provoke a positive supply response that would outweigh potential inflationary consequences. The US operated with more flexible labour markets. Its capital market was better equipped to supply venture funds to innovators. Its economy was as big as Western Europe but much more closely integrated. Demand buoyancy was sustained by a stock market boom in the 1990s.
The United States was a major gainer from the globalisation of international capital markets. In the postwar period until 1988, US foreign assets always exceeded liabilities, but thereafter its net foreign asset position moved from around zero to minus $1.5 trillion (more than 20% of GDP). Thus the rest of the world helped to sustain the long American boom and financed the large US payments deficit.
The table provides a quantification of growth performance of eight major regions of the world economy and some very tentative projections for development up to the year 2015.
The demographic projections are those of the United Nations Population Division, and indicate a continuing decline in the rate of population growth in virtually all parts of the world. Nevertheless there will still be a very striking difference between the advanced capitalist group and Africa. At 0.33% a year it would take 210 years to double population in the first group. In Africa it is likely to happen within 32 years. [forcing all white people to marry would not work]
In making per capita GDP projections, I assumed a continuance of 1990-2001 rates of performance in Western Europe and Japan and a mild slowdown in the USA, where the information technology bubble of the 1990s has burst, and where the capital inflow which financed its trade deficit seems likely to slacken substantially. Aggregate per capita growth in the “West” seems unlikely to slow down very significantly, but combined with the demographic slowdown, it means that aggregate GDP growth would be about 2% a year. This pace would be similar to that in 1913-1950. Growth momentum transmitted by the “West” is likely to be more modest than in 1870-1913 and 1973-2001.
Asia (excluding Japan)
The most buoyant part of the world economy since the early 1970s has been Asia (excluding Japan). These economies have grown faster than those of the West and their buoyancy has been sustained in great part by their own policies. Their weight in the world economy is much larger than any other non-Western region. I assumed that their per capita growth 2001-2015 will be at the same pace as in 1990-2001.
These economies are catching up with the West and are still at a level of development where “opportunities of backwardness” are unlikely to erode. The combination of high investment rates and rapid GDP growth means that their physical capital stock has been growing more rapidly than in other parts of the world. The East Asian economies also have a high ratio of employment to population. This is due to falling fertility and a rising share of population of working age, but also reflects the traditionally high labour mobilisation of multi-cropping rice economies. In all cases which are documented they had high rates of improvement in education and the quality of human capital. Equally striking were the rapid growth of exports, the high ratio of exports to GDP, and a willingness to attract foreign direct investment as a vehicle for assimilation of foreign technology. These characteristics of China, South Korea and Chinese-Taipei have made for super-growth, but there is a second tier of countries whose growth is accelerating rapidly. The most notable case is India which has the potential to join the super-growth club. There are other economies where prospects are more problematic, but these are only a sixth of the Asian total. The projections assume no substantial change in their performance.
Latin America is the second largest non-Western region with about 8% of world product and a slightly bigger share of world population. Until the 1970s, economic policy was different from that in the advanced capitalist group. Most countries never seriously tried to observe the fixed rate discipline of Bretton Woods. National currencies were repeatedly devalued, IMF advocacy of fiscal and monetary rectitude was frequently rebuffed, high rates of inflation became endemic. Most countries reacted with insouciance to the worldwide explosion of prices, and governments felt that they could accommodate high rates of inflation. They were able to borrow on a large scale at negative real interest rates to cover external deficits incurred as a result of expansionary policies.
However, the basic parameters had changed by the early 1980s. By then, the OECD countries were pushing anti–inflationary policy very vigorously. The change to restrictive monetary policy initiated by the US Federal Reserve pushed up interest rates suddenly and sharply. Between 1973 and 1982, external debt increased sevenfold and the credit worthiness of Latin America as a whole was grievously damaged by Mexico’s debt delinquency in 1982. The flow of voluntary private lending stopped abruptly, and created a massive need for retrenchment in economies teetering on the edge of hyperinflation and fiscal crisis. In most countries resource allocation was distorted by subsidies, controls, widespread commitments to government enterprise and detailed interventionism. Most of them also had serious social tension, and several had unsavoury political regimes.
In the 1930s, most Latin American countries resorted to debt default, but it was not a very attractive option in the 1980s. World trade had not collapsed, international private lending continued on a large scale. The IMF and World Bank had substantial facilities to mitigate the situation, and leverage to pressure Western banks to make involuntary loans and legitimate a substantial degree of delinquency.
In the 1980s, the attempts to resolve these problems brought major changes in economic policy. But in most countries, changes were made reluctantly. After experiments with heterodox policy options in Argentina and Brazil, most countries eventually embraced the neoliberal policy mix pioneered by Chile. They moved towards greater openness to international markets, reduced government intervention, trade liberalisation, less distorted exchange rates, better fiscal equilibrium and establishment of more democratic political systems.
The cost of this transition was a decade of falling per capita income in the 1980s. After 1990, economic growth revived substantially but the process was interrupted by contagious episodes of capital flight.
My projections for Latin America assume some modest improvement in per capita performance in 2001-2015.
Africa has nearly 13% of world population, but only 3% of world GDP. It is the world’s poorest region. Its population is growing seven times as fast as in Western Europe. Per capita income in 2001 was below its 1980 peak. African economies are more volatile than most others because export earnings are concentrated on a few primary commodities, and extremes of weather (droughts and floods) are more severe and have a heavy impact.
As a result of rapid growth, little more than half the population is of working age. Almost half are illiterate. They have had a high incidence of infectious and parasitic disease (malaria, sleeping sickness, hookworm, river blindness, yellow fever). Over two thirds of HIV-infected people live in Africa. As a result the quantity and quality of labour input per head of population is much lower than in other parts of the world.
European powers became interested in grabbing Africa in the 1880s. Twenty-two countries eventually emerged from French colonisation, 21 from British, 5 from Portuguese, 3 from Belgian, 2 from Spanish. Germany lost its colonies after the First World War, Italy after the Second. The colonialists created boundaries to suit their own convenience, with little regard to local traditions or ethnicity. European law and property rights were introduced with little regard to traditional forms of land allocation. Hence European colonists often got the best land and most of the benefits from exploitation of mineral rights and plantation agriculture. African incomes were kept low by forced labour or apartheid practices. Little was done to build a transport infrastructure or to cater for popular education.
Colonisation ended between 1956 and 1974. In South Africa, the mass of the population did not get political rights until 1994. Independence brought many serious challenges. The political leadership had to try to create elements of national solidarity and stability more or less from scratch. The new national entities were in most cases a creation of colonial rule. There was great ethnic diversity with no tradition or indigenous institutions of nationhood. The linguistic vehicle of administration and education was generally French, English or Portuguese rather than the languages most used by the mass of the population. Africa became a focus of international rivalry during the cold war. China, the USSR, Cuba and East European countries supplied economic and military aid to new countries viewed as proxies in a worldwide conflict of interest. Western countries, Israel and Chinese-Taipei were more generous in supplying aid and less fastidious in its allocation than they might otherwise have been. As a result, Africa accumulated large external debts which had a meagre developmental pay-off.
There was a great scarcity of people with education or administrative experience. Suddenly these countries had to create a political elite, staff a national bureaucracy, establish a judiciary, create a police force and armed forces, send out dozens of diplomats. The first big wave of job opportunities strengthened the role of patronage and rent-seeking, and reduced the attractions of entrepreneurship. The existing stock of graduates was too thin to meet the demands and there was heavy dependence on foreign personnel.
The process of state creation involved armed struggle in many cases. Many countries have suffered from civil wars and bloody dictators. These wars were a major impediment to development.
In many African states, rulers have sought to keep their positions for life. In most states, rulers relied for support on a narrow group who shared the spoils of office. Corruption became widespread, property rights insecure, business decisions risky.
A major factor in the slowdown since 1980 has been external debt. As the cold war faded from the mid-1980s, foreign aid levelled off, and net lending to Africa fell. Although the flow of foreign direct investment has risen it has not offset the fall in other financial flows
The challenges to development in Africa are greater than in any other continent, the deficiencies in health, education and nutrition the most extreme. It is the continent with the greatest need for financial aid and technical assistance. The per capita GDP projections assume that these kinds of aid will be increased and that per capita growth will be positive. However, it is unlikely that African countries will, by 2015, be able to establish a trajectory of rapid catch-up such as Asian economies have achieved.
In Eastern Europe, the economic system was similar to that in the USSR from 1948 to the end of the 1980s, and so was economic performance. In 1950-1973, per capita growth more or less kept pace with that of Western Europe, but faltered badly as the economic and political system began to crumble. From 1973-1990, it grew at 0.5% a year compared with 1.9% in Western Europe.
The transition from a command to a market economy was difficult in all of the countries. The easiest part was freeing prices and opening of trade with the West. This ended shortages and queuing, improved the quality of goods and services and increased consumer welfare. However, much of the old capital stock became junk; the labour force needed to acquire new skills and work habits; the legal and administrative systems and the tax/social benefit structure had to be transformed; the distributive and banking networks to be rebuilt from scratch. The travails of transition led to a fall in average per capita income for the group from 1990 to 1993, but it rose by over 3% a year from then to 2001. My projection assumes that this pace of advance can be maintained at least until 2015. In fact, these countries can probably do better than this if they can be integrated into the European Union with better access to its goods, labour, and capital markets, its regional and other subsidies, than they have thus far enjoyed. Present real income levels are only a third of those in Western Europe. Wages are also much lower, but the disparity in skills is much less. The Eastern economies are therefore capable of mounting a catch-up dynamic similar to that of Asia if the integration takes place.
Successor states of former USSR
Fifteen successor states emerged from the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. In all of them, there was already a very marked deceleration of economic growth in 1973-1990. There was colossal inefficiency in resource allocation, a very heavy burden of military expenditure and associated spending, depletion and destruction of natural resources.
Capital/output ratios were higher than in capitalist countries. Materials were used wastefully. Shortages created a chronic tendency to hoard inventories. The steel consumption/GDP ratio was four times as high as in the US. The average industrial firm had 814 workers in 1987 compared with 30 in Germany and the UK. Transfer of technology from the West was hindered by trade restrictions, lack of foreign direct investment and very restricted access to foreign technicians and scholars. Work incentives were meagre, malingering on the job was commonplace. [but UBI and pensions will make it better /s]
The quality of consumer goods was poor. Retail outlets and service industries were few. Prices bore little relation to cost. Consumers wasted time queuing, bartering or sometimes bribing their way to the goods and services they wanted. There was an active black market, and special shops for the nomenklatura. There was increasing cynicism, frustration, growing alcoholism and a decline in life expectation. [so like America now?]
Soviet spending on its military and space effort was around 15% of GDP in the 1970s and 1980s, nearly three times the US ratio and five times as high as in Western Europe. There were significant associated commitments to Afghanistan, Cuba, Mongolia, North Korea, Vietnam and Soviet client states in Africa.
In the 1950s a good deal of agricultural expansion was in virgin soil areas, whose fertility was quickly exhausted. Most of the Aral sea was transformed into a salty desert. Exploitation of mineral and energy resources in Siberia and Central Asia required bigger infrastructure costs than in European Russia. The Chernobyl nuclear accident had a disastrously polluting effect on a large area of the Ukraine.
In 1985-1991 Gorbachev established a remarkable degree of political freedom and liberated Eastern Europe but had no coherent economic policy. From then to end 1999, Yeltsin broke up the Soviet Union, destroyed its economic and political system and moved towards a “market” economy. The economic outcome was a downward spiral of real income for the mass of the population. On average, GDP was nearly 30% lower in 2002 in the 15 republics than in 1990. Fixed investment and military spending fell dramatically, so the drop in private consumption was milder. There were very big changes in income distribution. Under the old system, basic necessities (bread, housing, education, health, crèches and social services) had been highly subsidised by the government or provided free by state enterprises to their workers. These all became relatively more expensive, the real value of wages and pensions was reduced by hyperinflation, and the value of popular savings was destroyed. There were major gains in the income of a new oligarchy. [i.e. cancelling Marxism cannot be overnight]
The new “market” economy is grossly inefficient and unfair in allocating resources. There has been legislation to establish Western style property rights, but in practice accountancy is opaque and government interpretation of property rights is arbitrary. Many businesses are subject to criminal pressure. Property owners such as shareholders or investors are uncertain whether their rights will be honoured. Workers are not sure their wages will be paid.
*This article is an adapted extract from Angus Maddison’s chapter, “The West and the Rest in the International Economic Order”, in Development is Back, OECD Development Centre, 2002.
It isn’t just Mark of the Beast, the Satanists want to sacrifice all your children, including potential. All count to Moloch.
The Mark is also a marker of infertility. Mark(er) of the Beast (whose sacrifice is what).
You know, owned infertility, like a pet. The Bible says never to get tattoos, and your duty on this earth is to be fruitful and make godly children. Scroll for just studies but context is important, I feel.
HCG-beta sterilises women (and children), what’s the bet it’ll be in one dose of one mandatory thingey, eventually? As you’ll see, all it needs is one. It mimics fatal cancer, encouraging the body to shut down reproduction to struggle to fight it off. Maybe not the first dose officially to force you all, better space it out to avoid suspicion.
I wonder where they’ll put this, along with other sterilising agents? Mistakes were made, woops! You can’t sue! Am I crazy now? I’m only covering HCG-beta today, 101 style. Do your own damn research and share share share the studies, 4chan, 8kun, the works.
Sterilization programme imminent like Bill and others did in Nigeria (and other places). Then again with HPV (which reduces fecundity, when checked with age-peers) as previously covered by me.
“The fear of vaccines: Fear that a vaccine used by the WHO to combat polio can cause sterility in both men and women, has spurred some Northern Nigerian states to block a crucial vaccination campaign that is aimed at eradicating the disease from West Africa. “
And you call Africa dumb? They’re not.
Herd immunity is a myth, also covered by me, even at 100% “coverage” (impossible) doesn’t work (unfalsifiable, fake science).
Remember, most spanish flu dead were vaccinated soldiers (and nurses), that’s why it got so many young people.
A pawpaw tested positive for this, FFS. A fruit and a goat!
They never say in ‘outbreaks’ of measles etc, how many who got sick ALREADY HAD the vaccine (most), they’ll deflect or try to hide that topic.
“Vaccines have been developed against both GnRH and hCG and these have undergone Phase I/II clinical trials documenting their safety, reversibility and efficacy. The heterospecies dimer hCG vaccine prevented pregnancy in women of proven fertility without impairment of ovulation or derangement of menstrual regularity and bleeding profiles.”
Jump through their evil hoops and they might let you be a free human again. Keep reproduction free! Also, end medical segregation. Slaves weren’t allowed to breed until their master said so.
Anti-fertility vaccines, you only naturally express it when you have ‘advanced’ cancer.
“Ectopic expression of hCG/hCGβ is observed in many advanced stage cancers of various origins.”
Mandatory? Medical Marxism argument: I can violate your body with bio-rape implants because it may possibly help me, theoretically – or some hypothetical person.
MEN AREN’T IN THE CLEAR.
“These reduce serum testosterone to castration levels causing atrophy of the prostate.”
The prize is disappointment. No lollipop.
“Castration levels” you couldn’t make it up. Evil has a PhD.
Guessing atrophy is permanent? Sounds kinda permanent.
“Expression of the free β-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCGβ) in malignant tumors is frequently associated with aggressive disease. The pretreatment serum concentration of hCGβ is an independent prognostic variable in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The three so-called type II genes (hCGβ 3/9, 5, and 8) have been shown to be up-regulated in relation to type I genes (hCGβ 6/7) in some malignant tumors.”
“This vaccine consists of a synthetic peptide representing, the carboxy-terminal 37 amino acids of hCG beta subunit coupled to diphtheria toxoid. The immunogen is pre- pared by linking the peptide to the carrier using a bifunctional reagent (6-maleimido caproic acyl N- hydroxy saccinimide ester)is in a manner to achieve predictable…”
“The second candidate vaccine is oLH.hCG-TT/CHB: a-subunit of ovine LH associated with hCG, linked to carriers such as TT or cholera toxin chain B (CHB). The third vaccine preparation is a physical mixture of hCG and oLH, each linked to carriers. These vaccines have completed phase I clinical trials in five centres in India.”
1989 publication date.
When you click:
Vaccines are under development for the control of fertility in males and females. This review discusses developments in anti-fertility vaccines at the National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India. A single injection procedure for the sterilization or castration of male animals depending on the site at which the injection is given, has passed through field testing and is expected to be on the market in the near future. Vaccines inducing antibodies against the human chorionic gonadotropin have gone through phase I trials with satisfactory results. A vaccine producing a consistently bioeffective antibody response against gonadotropin-releasing hormone is ready for phase I/II clinical trials in patients of carcinoma of prostate after due experimenation in animals and toxicology studies. Research to identify sperm antigens for incorporation into second generation vaccines is in progress.
This, in 1989. I didn’t exist then. Imagine what they have now.
Calling white people (or any) ‘females’ and ‘males’ is dehumanizing, especially intended to destroy you/r genetic lineage. Your God-given right. It just so happens black men recently popularised this use in rap, which isn’t controlled by a certain group with certain investments, is it? Phew.
They want you allergic to your own body. Autoimmune infertility, sterilization by antibody, it’s right there. CASTRATION, CHEMICAL CASTRATION.
“A single injection procedure for the sterilization or castration of male animals”
“Peptides representing the amino acid sequence of the carboxy‐terminal of the human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) beta subunit were used in studies to determine whether an immunogen could be prepared that would be suitable for an HCG antifertility vaccine. Peptides of varying length were conjugated to several macro‐molecular carriers, in varying peptide‐carrier ratios…”
“The World Health Organisation (WHO) Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines has selected the pregnancy hormone human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) as a target molecule for a contraceptive vaccine.”
You didn’t wanna breed, right?
How much would you pay for an anti-anti-fertility vaccine? Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines….. selected…. target…fucking Nazi ‘eugenics’ again. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7693535
Christians are up first.
They later changed the name for being too obvious on a scale of really fucking obvious to taking le piss. Henceforth, it has become really fucking obvious.
“Over the past 18 years, the WHOTaskForceonVaccines for Fertility Regulation has been supporting basic and clinical research on the development of birthcontrolvaccines directed against the gametes or the preimplantation embryo.”
NO SHIT, THAT’S THE TITLE. They think they own you.
During 1986-1988, the WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction used the diphtheria toxoid as a carrier for a fragment of the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) molecule (a conjugate immunogen) and an immunostimulant in a phase I clinical trial of this prototype antifertility vaccine in sterilized women. Between 1990 and 1991, it conducted teratology studies in rats and rabbits to determine whether the vaccine causes fetal abnormalities. The vaccine did not adversely affect either the animals or their fetuses. Clinical trials of the vaccine’s effectiveness (phase II trials) are scheduled for 1992. At least 2 injections several weeks apart, are needed to produce an anti-hCG immune response which is only effective for 3-6 months, however. So the same components of the original vaccine were placed in a polymer to deliver the vaccine slowly over a prolonged and predetermined time frame.WHO hoped that this advanced vaccine would raise effective immunity levels long enough to last for at least 1 year after 1 injection. WHO is conducting dose-response and toxicity studies of this prototype vaccine in rabbits and baboons to identify the optimal dose which would elicit an effective immunity level over a desired period of time and would be safe for testing in humans. WHO hopes to begin a phase I clinical trial with this advanced anti-hCG vaccine in late 1992. WHO anticipates that the preclinical and clinical trials will reveal a need for further modifications and improvements. WHO is supported multicenter research on antitrophoblast vaccines which target membrane cells of the preimplantation embryo since 1985. It uses monoclonal antibodies (MABs) and recombinant DNA technology to identify and isolate surface molecules. So far this research has tested 15,000 MABs but is centering on 9 MAbs. A study in baboons showed that 1 MAB reduced fertility, even though researchers could only use minute amounts of the protein in the injection.
Population control = PR for genocide. Go after the guidestones people and their love of carving stone.
PR is rebranded propaganda to the post-war period, rebranded deliberately by the likes of one Bernays. That is historical fact.
“Vaccines based on hCG have been proposed as a means either to prevent metastatic cancr6 or to control fertility’. Approaches to development of such vaccines have been pursued usij either the complete beta sub unit of hCG (hCG-fl) or the 37 amino acid CTP alone”
Most people wouldn’t want an anti-cancer anything if it made them sterile.
“The WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation. Its formation, objectives and research activities”
“As a result of this inter national, collaborative effort, a prototype anti-HCG vaccine is now undergoing clinical testing, raising the prospect that a totally new family planning method may be available before the end of the current decade.”
Guess the year. Guess. I’ll tell you in a few lines.*
Contesting claims on the safety and acceptability of anti-fertifity vaccines
spellings are often deliberate to thwart SEO
Contesting claims on the safety and acceptability of anti-fertility vaccines
This paper describes the controversy surrounding anti-fertility vaccines, focusing on the antihCG vaccine. It deals first with the rationale that researchers give for the development of antifertility vaccines, and the specific requirements that they set for the new contraceptive method.
Two distinct prototypes of anti-hCG vaccines are clearly emerging, one of which might be
characterised as maximising safety and the other as maximising efficacy. A vocal group of women’s health advocates have opposed the development of both prototype vaccines, pointing to theoretical health risks and the potential for abuse, and call for a stop to further research. This
paper shows how the scientists’ discourse on safety and acceptability of the technology to future
users has changed in response to the critique of women’s health advocates. Finally, it reflects on
the role of women’s health advocates in contraceptive technology development, and the
responses of researchers to their actions.
They took over womens’ groups to avoid discussion of important issues.
TLDR trust the “scientists” what human ‘error’? let alone ‘evil’ trust the ‘experts’
“The possibility of a contraceptive vaccine targeting human chorionic gonadotropin has long been recognized, but never fully realized.
weird, previously they’ve claimed success in ‘trials’?
they think you’re stupid
you can’t ban something they claim doesn’t exist (yet)
Here we describe an epitope-specific approach based on immunogenic display of hCG-derived peptides on virus-like particles of RNA bacteriophage. A number of recombinant VLPs were constructed, each displaying a different hCG-derived peptide. Some were taken from the disordered C-terminal tail of the hormone, another came from an internal loop, and yet another was an epitope mimic produced by affinity-selection on an hCG-neutralizing antibody target. Immunization of mice with some VLPs yielded antisera that bound the hormone and neutralized hCG biological activity.”
neutralised, like a threat neutered you – like a dog
share share share the studies, you don’t have to link to me just SHARE
I haven’t posted this previously to avoid it getting censored prematurely. Is anyone else keeping a tally of how many times I can piss off the WHO or NWO people without being murdered? Just me?
But they refuse to get educated about Barbary slavery of white women, Ottomans, Romans etc.
The feminism is dead there. They only want to talk about white people dominating brown ones.
I’ve heard barefaced lies about the Indian mutiny, where they raped various white women and little girls. It was a huge scandal at the time. In all the papers. They’re whitewashing with the dregs of Tumblr history.
What the MSM never talks about in the West. Bet you never heard about it.
Don’t worry, most people haven’t.
Every time I tell people Russia and China are officially in bed (making the Russia accusation really Chink ones), people don’t believe me until I show them. Russia outsourced its Marxism to China, like everything else.
The Soviet Union never died, it simply changes premises.
China + India = 2819328161 (inc. most planetary fighting-age men)
Minus the feeble and elderly from the Western figures in your mind so….
3,254,462,713 = 3.25 billion members before considering entering members.
Check my stats.
World population when I checked: 7791849800 or 7.79 billion for short later.
41.767% before counting other nation members.
Over half of the world’s population, practically speaking, are in one full union and …. you didn’t even know about this?
So no you can’t 2.2 kids fuck your way out of this from the comfy little suburbs, even including the genetic suicides like MGTOW and dregs of spiteful mutants like SJWs. You could force every single fertile white woman to marry every equivalent man (forcing men to marry) and it still won’t outcompete them in quantity because they’re r-types.
Whites are the global minority, in extremis. I have long since covered this. Go forth and multiply Boomers, you had ONE job. Proof if one generation drops the ball (abortion, inc the Pill) we all suffer. Especially if they enable the super-boosting of the birth rate of the out-group too. The NWO types were breeding us all like cattle for a war, yet to happen. Nothing short of a full Malthusian trap and mass deportations would work now.
Asia is the most r-select continent and race, Africa is also the least of our problems.
4.6 billion and counting, the global MAJORITY. Weebs BTFO. Most of the planet is Asian, they’re such blatant r-strategists. You’ve been cucked genetically already by the bleeding heart of your forebears’ “charity” (really pathological altruism).
4.6/7.79 = 59% Asian. The planet is 59% Asian. Stop ignoring this.
You can’t discuss a future for the West until you address this. It’s redpill reality.
I included my maths, you have NO excuse. What’s the SCO called, again?
They know. They also told white men getting married was ‘too risky’. Boo hoo princess, grow up. Do you get in a car? Don’t do it, it might crash! You sicken me.
For once, the cover models are all-white.
Celebrate the barren life!
If you don’t believe me, you’ve seen that one, have you seen this?
Yay! We’re dead-ends genetically!
MGTOW are pure Establishment propaganda at this point. Whatever the origins, it’s now a weapon.
Why do you think they’re still around financially? They haven’t been “cancelled” on all socialist media?
The so-called ‘incel’ violence (really bachelor is the historic term until age 35) is just a white person version of a terror cell, an anti-white terror cell. Their forums are a cult where nobody is allowed to leave or be happy with a family. Happiness in a family unit doesn’t exist, don’t believe the studies!
So noble, so intelligent.
Because dehumanising white women and only whites as ‘females’ makes you cultured. Nothing like those evil SJWs, who don’t believe in the word ‘woman’! Can you imagine being that easily triggered by the word ‘woman’?
Like fine don’t marry, celibacy has always existed, fairy. It isn’t special. Bragging about something you haven’t done is worse than bragging about something you were born. It isn’t even a thing. At least Africans were born black, they did something.
I have run the numbers.
Try to look young forever, rather than be a breeder, ew!
I covered the circumcision/viagra connection.
Member states plus three observers:
+ Iran, Belarus, Afghanistan = 3,386,833,331
Bumps it up to 43% of the whole world population, so far. As white Westerners are dying apace.
Tell me: why isn’t this in our news?
Why is the white minority stuff never ever ever mentioned to be already here?
Well, I foresee this ending well. Signed, Malthus.